Bench and ambulatory field evaluation of the A & D TM-2420 automated sphygmomanometer

Adequate evaluation of automated sphygmomanometers, in terms of safety, accuracy, mechanical reliability, patient acceptability and ability to record ambulatory blood pressure is essential before these devices are used in clinical practice and in clinical trials. We have evaluated the accuracy and performance of the A & D TM-2420 automated sphygmomanometer, an auscultatory device designed for ambulatory blood pressure recording. Four devices were tested for accuracy by simultaneous comparison against two experienced observers using standard mercury column sphygmomanometers. Two of these devices developed faults that precluded complete evaluation. One of the remaining devices met and one failed to meet the somewhat liberal criteria for accuracy recommended by the American Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, the current standard for evaluation (mean difference of less than or equal to 5 mmHg and standard deviation of differences less than or equal to 8 mmHg). The mean differences (standard deviation of differences) between observers for simultaneous triplicate observations of systolic/diastolic pressure in 50 subjects, including 35 hypertensives, were 0.8 (3.0)/-0.6 (2.4) mmHg. In comparison, the differences between each device and each observer were: device 11, observer 1, -6.4 (5.4)/-6.3 (9.9); device 11, observer 2, -5.6 (4.7)/-7.0 (10.4); device 12, observer 1, -4.9 (5.2)/-4.0 (7.5); device 12, observer 2, -4.1 (4.9)/- -4.5 (7.7) mmHg. Ambulatory trials were carried out with a further 10 devices. Of these, seven developed faults requiring their return to the supplier. Numerous additional problems were encountered with microphones, cuffs, leads and connections, the processing unit, error algorithms and data-handling software. The device was not capable of making truly ambulatory recordings. We do not confirm the previously favourable, but limited, evaluation of this device. We stress the vital importance of subjecting a number of devices to benchtesting for accuracy, and the need to undertake extensive 'field' testing before any devices can be considered suitable for ambulatory recording. Exercise testing under laboratory conditions is not an adequate substitue for true ambulatory evaluation.

An evaluation of the A&D UA-751 semi-automated cuff-oscillometric sphygmomanometer

We compared blood pressure recordings made with the A&D UA-751 semi-automated cuff-oscillometric sphygmomanometer (A&D Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) and with a conventional Hawksley random-zero mercury sphygmomanometer (Hawksley and Sons Ltd, Lancing, UK). Simultaneous single-arm recordings were obtained in duplicate with both devices in 200 subjects having blood pressure in the ranges 92-221/51-121 mmHg. The measurements obtained by three observers using the Hawksley sphygmomanometer were compared with recordings from two A&D UA-751 devices. In most cases, there was an acceptable level of agreement between the results, according to the criteria suggested by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (range of differences systolic: mean - 0.9 to 1.4 mmHg, s.d. 4.6-9.8 mmHg; diastolic: mean - 0.6 to 1.3 mmHg, s.d. 2.9-5.1 mmHg), although there were sizeable discrepancies in individual subjects. Thus the A&D UA-751 device appears to be an acceptable alternative to a conventional sphygmomanometer; it should be suitable for routine clinical and limited research use, including intermittent home blood pressure recording.

Evaluation of a long acting formulation of nicardipine in hypertension by clinic and home recorded blood pressures and Doppler aortovelography

1. A novel formulation of nicardipine (50% standard (short acting), 50% sustained release) was evaluated in mild hypertension in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study, using clinic measurements (Hawksley) augmented by home recorded blood pressures (Copal UA 251). 2. Nicardipine 60 mg twice daily for 28 days produced a highly significant reduction in sitting blood pressure compared with placebo both pre dose (mean difference 17/8 mm Hg) and 2 h post dose (mean difference 34/26 mm Hg). 3. Home recordings confirmed the hypotensive effect and also revealed a consistent 'peak' effect between 2-4 h after dosing (mean difference 32/22) mm Hg). 4. Doppler aortovelography at 2 h post-dose showed a significant increase in in stroke and minute distance (linear analogues of stroke volume and cardiac output respectively) compared with placebo. The increase in stroke distance was linearly related to change in plasma concentration of nicardipine. 5. Of the 14 patients enrolled in the study, nine experienced troublesome adverse effects on nicardipine (headaches, facial flushing, palpitations, ankle oedema) and two of these were unable to complete the study as a result. 6. This formulation of nicardipine, in the fixed dosage used in this study, is characterized by an effective antihypertensive action but also by an unacceptable adverse effect profile, presumably due to an excess of its 'short acting' component.

Circadian rhythm of the in vitro stimulation of adenylate cyclase in rat heart tissue

Adenylate cyclase activity in rat heart ventricles displayed a circadian rhythm with a maximum around 8:00 h and a minimum around 20:00 h. In vitro stimulation with 0.1 mM of isoprenaline, Gpp(NH)p or forskolin increased the 24-h-mean basal adenylate cyclase activity by 1.7-, 2.7- and 10.7-fold, respectively. The magnitude of the drug-induced stimulation varied significantly with the time of day. However, the drugs did not affect the timing of the circadian maximum or the amplitude (as % of 24-h-mean) of the basal rhythm. The data are the first to show that the response to the in vitro stimulation of the cardiac adenylate cyclase also displays a pronounced circadian rhythm.

Atenolol or propranolol in hypertensive patients poorly controlled on captopril and frusemide

Eighteen patients whose clinic blood pressure (BP) remained over 95 mmHg despite treatment with captopril 50 mg twice daily plus frusemide 40 mg twice daily were randomised in a crossover study to four weeks' treatment with once daily atenolol 100 mg, slow release propranolol 160 mg or placebo. The reduction in BP on atenolol was superior to that on both propranolol and placebo. The mean supine BP 24 hours post dosing were 177/110 mmHg (placebo), 173/109 mmHg (propranolol) and 164/100 mmHg (atenolol). The corresponding mean heart rates were 77 bpm (placebo), 63 bpm (propranolol) and 62 bpm (propranolol) and 62 bpm (atenolol). The difference in hypotensive efficacy between atenolol and propranolol is not readily explained but our study shows that atenolol has a clinically useful supplementary effect on BP. Refractory hypertension remains an important clinical problem and further studies are required to establish the optimum combination of drugs that should be used with captopril in order to achieve 'target' BP in patients with moderate to severe hypertension.

Single doses of enalapril and atenolol in hypertensive patients treated with bendrofluazide

Enalapril in single doses of 5 and 10 mg and atenolol in a single dose of 50 mg were given to 16 hypertensive patients on long-term treatment with bendrofluazide, 5 mg daily, in a double-blind randomized crossover placebo controlled study. Both doses of enalapril and atenolol produced similar effects on blood pressure. The mean maximal reduction in blood pressure from baseline with all three active treatments was approximately 32/18 mmHg both supine and standing and occurred on average at 6 h after tablet ingestion. Both supine and standing heart rate fell significantly after atenolol, but no significant change occurred after enalapril. This study establishes that 5 mg enalapril is the maximal starting dose that need be used in hypertensive patients already on diuretic treatment. Even this dose may be hazardous in some patients. The study also serves to emphasize that such combination-therapy studies should be carried out at an early stage in drug development, prior to widespread prescription to patients, in order to avoid unnecessary overdosage with new agents.

Audit of an oral anticoagulant teaching program

Quality assurance criteria for a pharmacist-conducted oral anticoagulant teaching program were studied. The teaching program involved the presentation of descriptive diagrams accompanied by a reinforcing explanation given by a pharmacist. Topics discussed included clotting, warfarin therapy, diet and drug interactions. An audit, consisting of a pretest and posttest, was developed to measure patient knowledge as a measurement of the program's effectiveness. Forty ambulatory patients participated in the study over a three-month period. Before instruction, only five patients were adequately knowledgeable about all of the information components. After instruction, this number increased to 20 patients, and all 40 patients had a better knowledge of each topic. The audit revealed that the program's standards were not completely appropriate and that other methods of program delivery must be evaluated and implemented.