Primary afferent depolarization. Distribution of the gamma-aminobutyric acid system in frog spinal cord

In the frog spinal cord primary afferent depolarization (PAD) constitutes a powerful inhibitory control mechanism. It has been suggested that gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is the transmitter substance involved in the genesis of PAD. In these studies we show that maximal glutamic acid decarboxylase activity is localized roughly 400-600 micrometers from the dorsal surface, and that correlates well with the intraspinal distribution of field potentials associated with PAD. Measurements of GABA in serial spinal cord sections cut in a dorsal--ventral direction shows that high levels of GABA are seen at 400--600 micrometers, with a peak at 800 micrometers from the dorsal surface. Stimulation at frequencies shown to produce PAD augments the release of endogenous GABA from a superfused frog hemicord preparation.

The filum terminale of the frog spinal cord, a non transformed preparation: I. Morphology and uptake of gamma-aminobutyric acid

The filum terminale of the frog spinal cord is a rather pure glial cell preparation, largely devoid of neuronal elements. gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) is taken up by the frog filum terminale (FT) via a Na+-dependent, ouabain-inhibited, saturable high affinity transport system with a Km of 2.7 x 10(5) M. The rate of the FT GABA uptake is significantly greater than the velocities observed in the spinal cord. In fact, the Vmax increases caudally beyond the level of the last root, and is maximal in the FT per se. beta-Alanine is a competitive inhibitor of the FT high affinity transport system for GABA (Ki 11.1 x 10(-5) M). In addition to GABA, the FT also takes up beta-alanine, glycine, glutamate and aspartate at rates significantly higher than those shown by the spinal cord of the frog. Light and electron microscope level radioautography clearly shows that GABA uptake occurs primarily in the glial cells and also in ependymal cells present in the FT. In that the FT contains few ependymal cells and a large number of glia, it is fair to state that most of the GABA accumulated by the FT reflects the glial transport of this amino acid. Unlike the adult frog, the spinal cord of the tadpole does not show any regional differences in the rate of GABA transport during early development. However, during later developmental stages, the rates of GABA transport increase in the caudal portion of the tadpole cord as compared to the more rostral areas. Close to metamorphosis, the terminal portion of the tadpole cord, which is destined to become the filum terminals of the frog, accumulates GABA at rates not greatly different from those observed in the FT of the adult frog. Therefore, the tadpole spinal cord is a useful preparation in which to study the dynamic properties of normal non-transformed glia as influenced by a changing neuronal population, whereas the frog FT is a unique preparation for the study of some properties of normal glia largely in the absence of neurons.