Improving physician-delivered counseling in a primary care setting: lessons from a failed attempt

BACKGROUND

The high prevalence of behavioral risk factors for cardiovascular diseases demands innovative approaches to achieving behavior change. Primary care physicians are in an ideal position for offering such interventions.

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether training of primary care physicians in counseling skills based on the Transtheoretical Model (TTM) leads to motivational and behavioral changes in their patients.

METHOD

Seventy-four primary care physicians in Germany were randomly assigned to either an intervention condition (one day of training in TTM-based counseling plus brochures matched to their patients' "stages of change") or a control condition (usual care). Baseline and 12-month follow-up data were collected from 305 of their patients who signed up for a health check-up.

OUTCOME MEASURE

Patients' movements across the stages of change for smoking, diet, exercise and stress management.

RESULTS

After 12 months, patients of physicians in the intervention group did not show more movement through the stages of change for any of the behaviors than did patients of control physicians. Additionally, there were no differences between groups in counseling frequency, counseling intensity, or patient satisfaction with counseling.

CONCLUSIONS

A high dropout rate at follow-up and resulting "power" problems limit the possible conclusions. The high numbers of patients in early stages of change and the minimal improvement over time underline the need for improving motivational counseling skills of primary care physicians in Germany. In our study the dissemination of these strategies failed. We offer lessons we feel can be learned from this outcome. Further studies should focus on ways to enhance the process of educating physicians for implementing counseling strategies in primary care settings.

[Community emergency medical service. Epidemiology and quality of treatment in a rural district]

OBJECTIVES

Rapid aid provided by lay witnesses and emergency services can improve the outcome in medical emergencies arising in the community. We attempted to study the quality of first aid rendered by lay persons, paramedical personnel, and community medical practitioners attending out-of-hospital emergencies. We also evaluated the frequency of first aid provided before the arrival of specialised emergency physicians.

METHODS

Over a period of six months all emergencies in a rural district of Germany leading to the pre-hospital medical service being dispatched were studied. Specialised community emergency physicians arriving at the site of the event recorded demographic, clinical, and process data using a standardised instrument. They also assessed the performance of lay persons, paramedical personnel, and community physicians providing immediate care. Implicit and explicit criteria were used.

RESULTS

In 97% of cases analysed (n = 1150) members of the above mentioned groups were present before the arrival of the dedicated medical service. Lay persons were judged to provide inadequate care especially with regard to airway management and immobilisation of suspected fractures. For paramedical personnel, the administration of medication, venous lines and immobilisation turned out to be problematic areas. Medical practitioners fell below the defined standards especially in airway management, immobilisation and venous lines.

CONCLUSION

Our project has shown how important the evaluated groups are for community emergency care. Despite methodological problems in this area of study, the shortcomings demonstrated may be targeted by future training at different levels.

'Home hypertension': exploring the inverse white coat response

BACKGROUND

The classical 'white coat response' to blood pressure measurement has been studied thoroughly. However, little is known about patients showing a reverse pattern, i.e. who have lower blood pressure readings at the clinic than outside healthcare facilities.

AIM

To estimate the proportion of patients whose blood pressure levels as determined by self-measurements at home are higher than those taken at the clinic and to explore possible associations with demographic, clinical, and psychological variables.

METHOD

Patients consecutively attending (n = 214) an academic family medicine department in Toronto, Canada, were eligible. Subjects aged below 16 years and those on psychotropic or blood pressure-lowering agents were excluded. The clinic-home blood pressure difference (CHBPD) was calculated for each participating subject by subtracting home blood pressure from clinic blood pressure. Those who had negative values were compared with the rest of the sample.

RESULTS

A considerable proportion of patients had lower blood pressure at the clinic than at home (systolic, 34.6%; diastolic, 23.8%). These subjects did not differ from the rest of the sample with regard to age, sex, levels of education attained, immigration status, body mass index, experience of current symptoms, blood pressure levels, or psychological distress. However, in patients with a 'negative CHBPD', i.e. lower blood pressure at the clinic than at home, readings taken by an automatic, self-inflating device when still at the clinic were higher than in the rest of the sample.

CONCLUSION

The results point to measurement bias being at least partly responsible for higher blood pressure readings outside the clinic. Automatic measurement devices used for self/home blood pressure measurement seem to cause an alerting reaction analogous to the well-described 'white coat response'.

Family practitioners' remuneration and patterns of care--does social class matter?

The objective of the study is to examine whether medical care patterns and/or outcomes for patients under a prepaid system differ from those under fee-for-service according to social class. An effect of this kind was suggested by the investigators reporting on the RAND Health Insurance Experiment (RAND HIE). We performed a cross-sectional study in family practice in Germany (fee-for-service) and the UK (predominantly capitation i.e. prospective payment). 778 attending patients aged 18 and above were included. Indicators of care, relating mainly to cardiovascular prevention, were collected by patient interview and questionnaire, doctor's questionnaire, analysis of records, and blood pressure (BP) measurement. Multiple linear and logistic regression models with these indicators as dependent variables were calculated to examine possible interactions between social class and system of payment. Social class as a main effect was related to diastolic BP, BP measurement frequency, and the number of non-pharmacological interventions to lower BP. The data on the process and the outcome of primary care from British and German family practice do not show any significant interaction between system of family practitioners' remuneration and patients' social class. We were unable to reproduce the effect postulated by the RAND HIE investigators.

Low blood pressure associated with low mood: a red herring?

OBJECTIVE

Several reports have discussed a relationship between blood pressure (BP) and psychological well-being scales. Lower BP readings were associated with higher levels of psychological distress and fatigue. This study sought to replicate the association found by previous secondary analyses of epidemiological surveys.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Academic Family Medicine Department in Toronto, Canada.

SUBJECTS

214 practice attenders. STUDY MEASURES: Extent of psychological abnormalities with the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), self-reported fatigue, in-clinic and home BP measurements.

RESULTS

No significant relationship between blood pressure levels and GHQ-score or fatigue could be demonstrated. This applies to clinic and home measurements for systolic and diastolic pressure. Neither adjustment for age or sex nor for several confounders through multiple linear regression produced significant associations in the postulated direction. No nonlinear relationship could be shown either. The study had a power of 95% to detect a correlation of r = 0.22 (alpha = 0.05, one-sided).

CONCLUSION

The study specifically addressing the possible link between blood pressure and psychological dysfunction/fatigue, could not confirm the previously reported association. Problems related to type-I error in epidemiological research are discussed.

Is the 'clinic-home blood pressure difference' associated with psychological distress? A primary care-based study

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether there is an association between the 'clinic-home blood pressure difference' (CHBPD) and psychological distress in a sample not selected without regard to blood pressure and hypertension status.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study.

SETTING

An academic family medicine department in Toronto, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

Consecutive attenders (n = 214) of the primary care facility. Subjects aged less than 16 years and those being administered psychotropic or blood pressure-lowering agents were excluded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The CHBPD was calculated from clinic blood pressure readings and self-measurements by subjects at home; psychological distress was measured by the 30-item version of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ).

RESULTS

No significant association between the CHBPD and psychological distress could be shown for systolic and diastolic blood pressures. The same applied to GHQ subdomains and the CHBPD modelled on several independent variables by multiple linear regression analyses.

CONCLUSION

The results from this study, using a large sample drawn from a community, support the view that the CHBPD is not related to anxiety, depression and other forms of psychological distress, but rather is a reaction specific to the clinic setting itself.

Family practitioners' intervention against smoking in Germany and the UK: does remuneration affect preventive activity?

The effect of different systems of remuneration on preventive activity of family practitioners (FPs) were studied. Interventions against smoking were compared in FPs' practices in Germany and the UK. Almost 800 consecutively attending patients were included in a cross-sectional survey. Smoking prevalence was remarkably similar among German and British practice attenders. Slightly more than 50% of smokers in both countries remembered an intervention against their smoking by their FP or related staff. Multiple logistic regression analysis also showed that there was no significant difference for remembered interventions between the two countries (adjusted OR 1.15 [95%-Cl 0.6, 2.2]). The structure of interventions employed was similar in both countries. Most British and German ex-smokers denied that their FP had made an important contribution to their giving up smoking. There is evidence that, under capitation, FPs concentrate their activities on patients who are more at risk. Overall, however, the economic structure does not seem to influence the core of preventive behaviour of FPs to any great extent. Smoking cessation efforts in Family Practice need to be improved in both countries.

Hypotension--does it make sense in family practice?

In general practice many diagnostic labels are used that are related to cultural background rather than a scientific basis. To estimate the use of diagnoses like 'hypotension' and depression, a cross-sectional survey in German and British GPs' surgeries was performed. Prevalence of related symptoms, sociodemographic and medical data were recorded as well as actual and previous blood pressure levels. In German general practice, where 'hypotension' is an established entity, 17% of all patients attending were reported as hypotensive either by their doctor or by themselves. The proportion was twice as high among women than among men. It was more common among the young. One-quarter of these patients were on medication to raise their blood pressure. Actual and previous blood pressure levels failed to explain the occurrence of symptoms like tiredness, dizziness, headache etc. Demographic characteristics of patients diagnosed as depressed were similar in both countries. Presumably for economic reasons there is a tendency for German GPs to use more diagnostic labels of any kind. It was concluded that diagnostic labels attached to vague but frequently presented symptoms vary considerably between countries. They often lack a physiologic rationale. Nevertheless they often support the tendency to somatize common problems.