A case of inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy induced by T-wave oversensing due to hyperkalemia

There have been reports of hyperkalemia-induced T-wave oversensing in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). However, a comparison of T-wave amplitudes and morphologies between the surface 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and ICD electrogram has not been reported. We present the case of a 70-year-old man who received inappropriate ICD shocks due to hyperkalemia-induced T-wave oversensing. The T-wave amplitudes on both the ICD electrogram and 12-lead ECG corresponded and normalized after normalization of the potassium level.

Radiotherapy in patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a literature review

An increasing number of patients with implantable cardiac rhythm devices undergo radiotherapy (RT) for cancer and are thereby exposed to the risk of device failure. Current safety recommendations seem to have limitations by not accounting for the risk of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators malfunctioning at low radiation doses. Besides scant knowledge about optimal safety measures, only little is known about the exact prevalence of patients with devices undergoing RT. In this review, we provide a short overview of the principles of RT and present the current evidence on the predictors and mechanisms of device malfunctions during RT. We also summarize practical recommendations from recent publications and from the industry. Strongly associated with beam energy of photon RT, device malfunctions occur at ∼3% of RT courses, posing a substantial issue in clinical practice. Malfunctions described in the literature typically consist of transient software disturbances and only seldom manifest as a permanent damage of the device. Through close cooperation between cardiologists and oncologists, a tailored individualized approach might be necessary in this patient group in waiting time for updated international guidelines in the field.

Reduction of inappropriate ICD therapies in patients with primary prevention of sudden cardiac death: DECREASE study

BACKGROUND

A significant number of patients with an implantable cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention receive inappropriate shocks. Previous studies have reported a reduction of inappropriate therapies with simple modifications of ICD detection settings, however, inclusion criteria and settings varied markedly between studies. Our aim was to investigate the effect of raising the ICD detection zone in the entire primary prevention ICD population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

543 patients receiving an ICD for primary prevention were randomized to either conventional or progressive ICD programming. The detection rate was programmed at 171 bpm for ventricular tachycardia (VT) and 214 bpm for ventricular fibrillation (VF) in the Conventional group and 187 bpm for VT and 240 bpm for VF in the Progressive group. 43 % of patients received single-chamber and 57 % dual-chamber detection devices (DDD-ICD 19 %; CRT-D 38 %). The primary endpoint consisted of inappropriate therapies and untreated VT/VF. The primary endpoint was reached in 35 patients (13 %) in the Conventional group and 17 patients (6 %) in the Progressive group (p = 0.004). Progressive ICD programming led to significantly fewer amount of patients with ICD therapies (26 vs. 14 %; p < 0.001) and shocks (11 vs. 5 %; p = 0.023) compared to conventional ICD programming. Sub-analyses showed the greatest reduction of inappropriate therapies and shocks in dual-chamber detection devices with progressive compared to single-chamber detection devices with conventional ICD programming (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Progressive ICD programming reduces the number of inappropriate therapies and shocks in a broad primary prevention ICD population particularly in combination with dual-chamber detection algorithms.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

http://clinicaltrials.gov ; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01217528.

Construction of intracardiac vectorcardiogram from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator intracardiac electrograms

We constructed an intracardiac vectorcardiogram from 3 configurations of intracardiac cardiovertor defibrilator (ICD) electrograms (EGMs). Six distinctive 3 lead combinations were selected out of five leads: can to right ventricular coil (RVC); RVC to superior vena cava coil (SVC); atrial lead tip (A-tip) to right ventricular (RV)-ring; can to RV-ring; RV-tip to RVC, in a patient with dual chamber ICD. Surface spatial QRS-T angle (119.8°) was similar to intracardiac spatial QRS-T angle derived from ICD EGMs combination A (101.3°), B (96.1°), C (92.8°), D (95.2), E (99.0), F (96.2) and median (101.5). Future validation of the novel method is needed.

Usefulness of the wearable cardioverter defibrillator in patients in the early post-myocardial infarction phase with high risk of sudden cardiac death: A single-center European experience

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of the wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) therapy in early post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients remains uncertain.

METHODS

We analyzed the characteristics and outcomes of patients who received a WCD in the early post-MI phase.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were followed-up for 8 months (range, 4-16 months). Two patients (8.3%) received appropriate shocks. Left ventricular ejection fraction improved after the WCD therapy (P<0.01). Fourteen patients (58%) received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator at the end of the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Early post-MI patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death may benefit from WCD therapy.

Lessons learned from the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT)

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has evolved as a Class I treatment indication with Level of Evidence A, in patients with mild heart failure, depressed left ventricular ejection fraction, and wide QRS. In this review article, we will discuss the major findings of sub-studies published from the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT).

Magnetic resonance imaging safety in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: how far have we come?

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has long been regarded a general contraindication in patients with cardiovascular implanted electronic devices such as cardiac pacemakers or cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) due to the risk of severe complications and even deaths caused by interactions of the magnetic resonance (MR) surrounding and the electric devices. Over the last decade, a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms responsible for such potentially life-threatening complications as well as technical advances have allowed an increasing number of pacemaker and ICD patients to safely undergo MRI. This review lists the key findings from basic research and clinical trials over the last 20 years, and discusses the impact on current day clinical practice. With ‘MR-conditional’ devices being the new standard of care, MRI in pacemaker and ICD patients has been adopted to clinical routine today. However, specific precautions and specifications of these devices should be carefully followed if possible, to avoid patient risks which might appear with new MR technology and further increasing indications and patient numbers.

[Sudden cardiac death in the youth. Is the new subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator S-ICD an alternative solution?]

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is well-recognized therapy to prevent sudden cardiac death. Classic ICD need the use of permanent endocavitary leads, which may cause serious troubles (lead dislodgement, ventricular perforation, lead infections, etc.). The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) is a new device provided by only a subcutaneous lead. It has been developed for the last five years and it is becoming at present a real alternative to classic ICD. We report a clinical case of a 34 y.o. woman who presented a sudden cardiac death and who benefited the implantation of this new technology. This paper deals with the potential indications, usefulness benefits, and problems of the S-ICD.

Defibrillator patients should not be denied a peaceful death

BACKGROUND

Implantable defibrillators (ICDs) prevent sudden cardiac death. With declining health, ICD therapy may prolong death and expose the patient to unnecessary pain and anxiety. Few studies have addressed end of life care in ICD patients. The objective of this study was to investigate end of life in ICD patients, with respect to location of death; duration between do-not-resuscitate (DNR)-orders and deactivation of ICD therapy or DNR and time of death.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A descriptive analysis of 65 deceased ICD patients, all whom had a written DNR-order before death, is presented. The majority (86%) was treated in hospitals, mainly (63%) university hospitals, and many (33%) in cardiology wards. Despite DNR-order, ICD shock therapy was active in 51% of all patients. In those with therapy deactivated at death, therapy deactivation was carried out two days or more after DNR-order in more than a third (38%). The time from DNR decision to death in patients with therapy active had a median of four days (IQR 1-38). During the last 24h of life, 24% of the patients experienced shock treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of ICD patients with a DNR-order were treated in university hospitals. More than half still had shock treatment active at time of death with a median of four days or more between DNR decision and death. Patients with therapy deactivated, two days or more elapsed in more than a third from DNR decision to deactivation of therapy, exposing patients to a high risk of painful shocks before death.

Cardiac troponin levels following implantable cardioverter defibrillation implantation and testing

AIMS

Previous studies have reported the defibrillation testing during implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation is associated with elevated cardiac biomarkers and ST-segment electrocardiogram (ECG) changes suggesting that shocks during testing may cause harm. However, the effects of testing have not been isolated from the implant procedure itself, where lead deployment may cause myocardial damage. This prospective study examined high sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT) levels and ECG changes during ICD implanting alone, ICD implantation with testing and device testing as a stand-alone procedure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We examined hs-TnT at baseline, and 6-8 h post procedure and 12 lead ECG at baseline, and 30 s, 5 min, and 10 min post right ventricle lead deployment and post defibrillation. There was no significant change in hs-TnT levels in a group of patients (n = 11) undergoing defibrillation testing alone, while hs-TnT was significantly elevated in patients undergoing implantation alone (n = 13, median increase 96%, P = 0.005) and in patients undergoing implantation and testing (n = 13, median increase 161%, P = 0.005). There was a significant correlation between the number of lead deployments and the percentage change in hs-TnT (r = -0.51, P = 0.01), but no correlation between either the number of shocks (r = 0.26, P = 0.25) or the total delivered energy (r = 0.24, P = 0.30) and percentage change in hs-TnT.

CONCLUSION

Implantation of ICD leads was associated with release of troponin, but we did not observe any evidence that ICD shocks alone cause myocardial injury.

Effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy with implantable cardioverter defibrillator versus cardiac resynchronization therapy with pacemaker on mortality in heart failure patients: results of a high-volume, single-centre experience

Aims

There are limited and contradictory data on the effects of CRT with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (CRT-D) on mortality as compared with CRT with pacemaker (CRT-P).

Methods and results

We evaluated the long-term outcome of patients implanted with a CRT-D or CRT-P device in our high-volume single-centre experience. Data on all-cause mortality were derived from clinic visits and the Hungarian National Healthcare Fund Death Registry. Kaplan–Meier survival analyses and multivariate Cox regression models were used to evaluate all-cause mortality in patients with CRT-D vs. CRT-P, stratified by the aetiology of cardiomyopathy. From 2000 to 2011, 1122 CRT devices, 693 CRT-P (LVEF 28.2 ± 7.4%) and 429 CRT-D (LVEF 27.6 ± 6.4%), were implanted at our centre. During the median follow-up of 28 months, 379 patients died from any cause, 250 patients (36%) with an implanted CRT-P and 129 patients (30%) with an implanted CRT-D. There was no evidence of mortality benefit in patients implanted with a CRT-D compared with a CRT-P in the total cohort [hazard ratio (HR) 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73–1.32, P = 0.884]. In patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy, CRT-D treatment was associated with a significant 30% risk reduction in all-cause mortality compared with an implanted CRT-P (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.51–0.97, P = 0.03). In non-ischaemic patients, there was no mortality benefit of CRT-D over CRT-P (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.73–1.32, P = 0.894, interaction P-value = 0.15).

Conclusions

In heart failure patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy, CRT-D was associated with a mortality benefit compared with CRT-P, but no benefit of CRT-D over CRT-P in mortality was observed in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy.

Current use of implantable electrical devices in Sweden: data from the Swedish pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator registry

AIMS

The National Swedish Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) Registry collects prospective data on all pacemaker and ICD implants in Sweden. We aimed to report the 2012 findings of the Registry concerning electrical devices implantation rates and changes over time, 1 year complications, long-term device longevity and patient survival.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Forty-four Swedish implanting centres continuously contribute implantation of pacemakers and ICDs to the Registry by direct data entry on a specific website. Clinical and technical information on 2012 first implants and postoperative complications were analysed and compared with previous years. Patient survival data were obtained from the Swedish population register database. In 2012, the mean pacemaker and ICD first implantation rates were 697 and 136 per million inhabitants, respectively. The number of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) first implantations/million capita was 41 (CRT pacemakers) and 55 (CRT defibrillators), with only a slight increase in CRT-ICD rate compared with 2011. Most device implantations were performed in men. Complication rates for pacemaker and ICD procedures were 5.3 and 10.1% at 1 year, respectively. Device and lead longevity differed among manufacturers. Pacemaker patients were older at the time of first implant and had generally worse survival rate than ICD patients (63 vs. 82% after 5 years).

CONCLUSION

Pacemaker and ICD implantation rates seem to have reached a level phase in Sweden. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and CRT implantation rates are very low and do not reflect guideline indications. Gender differences in CRT and ICD implantations are pronounced. Device and patient survival rates are variable, and should be considered when deciding device type.

Role of patient education in the perception and acceptance of home monitoring after recent implantation of cardioverter defibrillators: the EDUCAT study

BACKGROUND

Much attention is being paid to the education of and provision of medical information to patients, to optimize their understanding and acceptance of their disease.

AIMS

To ascertain the impact of educating recent recipients of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) on their perception and acceptance of a home monitoring (HM) system.

METHODS

Questionnaire 1, completed one month after ICD implantation, was designed to assess: the quality of patient preparation for HM; patient comprehension of HM; and patient anxiety experienced during its installation. The comprehension questions were assigned a score of -2 for an incorrect answer, +1 for a correct answer and 0 for neither (total score ranging from -40 to +20). Questionnaire 2, completed six months after ICD implantation, assessed patient acceptance of and anxiety about HM.

RESULTS

The registry included 571 patients (mean age 63.9±12.8 years; 83% men; 76% of ICDs implanted for primary prevention) followed by HM for 6.2±1.2 months. Questionnaire 1 was completed by 430 (75.3%) patients and questionnaire 2 by 398 (69.7%) patients. Younger patients had a better comprehension of HM than older patients. High-quality training conditions improved the comprehension score, and a positive association was observed between anxiety and acceptance levels and the comprehension score. The 80±20% mean data transmission rate (days of transmission/days of follow-up ratio) was unrelated to the comprehension scores.

CONCLUSION

A clear understanding was associated with a higher acceptance of HM, although it was unrelated to the data transmission rate.

EuroEco (European Health Economic Trial on Home Monitoring in ICD Patients): a provider perspective in five European countries on costs and net financial impact of follow-up with or without remote monitoring

Aim

Remote follow-up (FU) of implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) allows for fewer in-office visits in combination with earlier detection of relevant findings. Its implementation requires investment and reorganization of care. Providers (physicians or hospitals) are unsure about the financial impact. The primary end-point of this randomized prospective multicentre health economic trial was the total FU-related cost for providers, comparing Home Monitoring facilitated FU (HM ON) to regular in-office FU (HM OFF) during the first 2 years after ICD implantation. Also the net financial impact on providers (taking national reimbursement into account) and costs from a healthcare payer perspective were evaluated.

Methods and results

A total of 312 patients with VVI- or DDD-ICD implants from 17 centres in six EU countries were randomised to HM ON or OFF, of which 303 were eligible for data analysis. For all contacts (in-office, calendar- or alert-triggered web-based review, discussions, calls) time-expenditure was tracked. Country-specific cost parameters were used to convert resource use into monetary values. Remote FU equipment itself was not included in the cost calculations. Given only two patients from Finland (one in each group) a monetary valuation analysis was not performed for Finland. Average age was 62.4 ± 13.1 years, 81% were male, 39% received a DDD system, and 51% had a prophylactic ICD. Resource use with HM ON was clearly different: less FU visits (3.79 ± 1.67 vs. 5.53 ± 2.32; P < 0.001) despite a small increase of unscheduled visits (0.95 ± 1.50 vs. 0.62 ± 1.25; P < 0.005), more non-office-based contacts (1.95 ± 3.29 vs. 1.01 ± 2.64; P < 0.001), more Internet sessions (11.02 ± 15.28 vs. 0.06 ± 0.31; P < 0.001) and more in-clinic discussions (1.84 ± 4.20 vs. 1.28 ± 2.92; P < 0.03), but with numerically fewer hospitalizations (0.67 ± 1.18 vs. 0.85 ± 1.43, P = 0.23) and shorter length-of-stay (6.31 ± 15.5 vs. 8.26 ± 18.6; P = 0.27), although not significant. For the whole study population, the total FU cost for providers was not different for HM ON vs. OFF [mean (95% CI): €204 (169–238) vs. €213 (182–243); range for difference (€−36 to 54), NS]. From a payer perspective, FU-related costs were similar while the total cost per patient (including other physician visits, examinations, and hospitalizations) was numerically (but not significantly) lower. There was no difference in the net financial impact on providers [profit of €408 (327–489) vs. €400 (345–455); range for difference (€−104 to 88), NS], but there was heterogeneity among countries, with less profit for providers in the absence of specific remote FU reimbursement (Belgium, Spain, and the Netherlands) and maintained or increased profit in cases where such reimbursement exists (Germany and UK). Quality of life (SF-36) was not different.

Conclusion

For all the patients as a whole, FU-related costs for providers are not different for remote FU vs. purely in-office FU, despite reorganized care. However, disparity in the impact on provider budget among different countries illustrates the need for proper reimbursement to ensure effective remote FU implementation.

Myocardial scar characteristics based on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is associated with ventricular tachyarrhythmia in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesized that myocardial scar characterization using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) may be associated with the occurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT), appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy and mortality.

BACKGROUND

Since a minority of patients with prophylactic ICD implantation receive appropriate ICD therapy, there is a need for more effective risk stratification for primary prevention in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 99 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, CMR was performed prior to ICD implantation. We assessed if CMR indices (cardiac mass, LVEF) and CMR scar characteristics (infarct core mass, peri-infarction mass and the ratio's between left ventricular mass, infarct core mass and peri-infarction mass) were associated with outcome. The primary endpoint was sustained VT and/or appropriate ICD therapy. The secondary endpoint was all-cause mortality. During a median follow-up of 5.4 years (IQR 4.5-6.6 years), 34 patients reached the primary end-point (17 appropriate ICD shocks) and 26 patients died. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, peri-infarction to core-infarction ratio (HR 2.01, 95%CI: 1.17-3.44, p=0.01) was independently and significantly associated with the primary endpoint, whereas NYHA-class and lower LVEF were not. Conversely, age (HR 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01-1.12, p=0.02) and lower LVEF (HR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.91-1.00, p=0.04) were independently associated with all-cause mortality, mainly due to heart failure.

CONCLUSION

A relatively large peri-infarction mass is associated with sustained VT and/or appropriate ICD therapy, whereas age and lower LVEF are associated with mortality. CMR based tissue characterization could aid in the prediction of specific outcome measures and in clinical decision making.

Characteristics associated with anxiety, depressive symptoms, and quality-of-life in a large cohort of implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients

OBJECTIVE

Although most patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) adjust well, some have considerable psychological distress. Factors associated with psychological adjustment in ICD-recipients are still not well understood. Our purpose was to describe quality-of-life (QoL) and prevalence of self-reported symptoms of anxiety and depression in a large national cohort of ICD-recipients, and to determine socio-demographic, clinical, and ICD-related factors associated with these variables.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, correlational design was used. All eligible adult ICD-recipients in the Swedish ICD- and Pacemaker Registry were invited to participate. Symptoms of anxiety and depression were measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and QoL with the EuroQol-5D.

RESULTS

A total of 3067 ICD-recipients (66±11years, 80% male) were included. The mean HADS score was 3.84±3.70 for anxiety symptoms and 2.99±3.01 for symptoms of depression. The mean EQ-5D index score was 0.82±0.21. The probability of symptoms of anxiety and depression was associated with younger age, living alone, and a previous history of myocardial infarction or heart failure. Additionally, female ICD-recipients had a higher probability of symptoms of anxiety. A higher level of ICD-related concerns was most prominently related to symptoms of anxiety, depressive symptoms and poorer QoL, while number of shocks, ICD-indication and time since implantation were not independently related.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large cohort of ICD-recipients, the association of ICD-related concerns with symptoms of anxiety, depressive symptoms, and poor QoL suggests that ICD specific factors should be addressed in order to improve outcomes.

Electrocardiographic predictors of sudden and non-sudden cardiac death in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the prognostic value of electrocardiogram (ECG)-based predictors in the primary prevention of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) among ischemic cardiomyopathy patients with depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≤35%).

BACKGROUND

The prediction of cause-specific mortality in high-risk patients offers the potential for targeting specific therapies (i.e., implantable cardioverter-defibrillator [ICD]).

METHODS

Subjects were recruited from the Prediction of Arrhythmic Events with Positron Emission Tomography (PAREPET) study. Continuous Holter 12-lead ECG recordings were obtained at the start of study and used to compute 15 clinically-important ECG abnormalities (e.g., atrial fibrillation).

RESULTS

Among 197 patients (age 67 ± 11 years, 93% male, mean follow-up 4.1 years) enrolled, 30 (15%) were SCA cases and 35 (18%) cardiac non-sudden deaths (C/NS). In multivariate analysis, only heart-rate-corrected QT interval (QTc) predicted SCA (hazard ratio 2.9 [1.2-7.3]) and only depressed heart rate variability (HRV) predicted C/NS (hazard ratio 5.0 [1.5-17.1]) independent of demographic and clinical parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with depressed LVEF, prolonged QTc suggests greater potential benefit from ICD therapy to prevent SCA; depressed HRV suggests potential benefit from bi-ventricular pacing to prevent C/NS.

Arrhythmogenic ventricular cardiomyopathy: A paradigm shift from right to biventricular disease

Arrhythmogenic ventricular cardiomyopathy (AVC) is generally referred to as arrhythmogenic right ventricular (RV) cardiomyopathy/dysplasia and constitutes an inherited cardiomyopathy. Affected patients may succumb to sudden cardiac death (SCD), ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTA) and heart failure. Genetic studies have identified causative mutations in genes encoding proteins of the intercalated disk that lead to reduced myocardial electro-mechanical stability. The term arrhythmogenic RV cardiomyopathy is somewhat misleading as biventricular involvement or isolated left ventricular (LV) involvement may be present and thus a broader term such as AVC should be preferred. The diagnosis is established on a point score basis according to the revised 2010 task force criteria utilizing imaging modalities, demonstrating fibrous replacement through biopsy, electrocardiographic abnormalities, ventricular arrhythmias and a positive family history including identification of genetic mutations. Although several risk factors for SCD such as previous cardiac arrest, syncope, documented VTA, severe RV/LV dysfunction and young age at manifestation have been identified, risk stratification still needs improvement, especially in asymptomatic family members. Particularly, the role of genetic testing and environmental factors has to be further elucidated. Therapeutic interventions include restriction from physical exercise, beta-blockers, sotalol, amiodarone, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and catheter ablation. Life-long follow-up is warranted in symptomatic patients, but also asymptomatic carriers of pathogenic mutations.

Chronic right ventricular apical pacing: adverse effects and current therapeutic strategies to minimize them

The permanent cardiac pacemaker is the only effective therapy for patients with symptomatic bradycardia and hundreds of millions are implanted worldwide every year. Despite its undisputed clinical benefits, the last two decades have drawn much attention to the negative effects associated with long-term pacing of the right ventricle (RV). Experimental and clinical studies have shown that RV pacing produces ventricular dyssynchrony, similar to that of left bundle branch block, with consequent detrimental effects on cardiac structure and function, with adverse clinical outcomes such as atrial fibrillation, heart failure and death. Although clinical evidence largely comes from subanalyses of pacemaker and implantable cardiac defibrillator studies, there is strong evidence that patients with reduced left ventricular function are at high risk of suffering from the detrimental effects of long-term RV pacing. Biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy devices can prevent ventricular dyssynchrony and has emerged as an attractive option in this patient group with promising results and more clinical studies underway. Moreover, there is evidence that specific pacemaker algorithms that minimize RV pacing can reduce the negative effects of RV stimulation on cardiac function and may also prevent clinical deterioration. The extent of the long-term clinical effects of RV pacing in patients with normal ventricular function and how to prevent this are less clear and subject to future investigation.

Costs of remote monitoring vs. ambulatory follow-ups of implanted cardioverter defibrillators in the randomized ECOST study

AIMS

The Effectiveness and Cost of ICD follow-up Schedule with Telecardiology (ECOST) trial evaluated prospectively the economic impact of long-term remote monitoring (RM) of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The analysis included 310 patients randomly assigned to RM (active group) vs. ambulatory follow-ups (control group). Patients in the active group were seen once a year unless the system reported an event mandating an ambulatory visit, while patients in the control group were seen in the ambulatory department every 6 months. The costs of each follow-up strategy were compared, using the actual billing documents issued by the French health insurance system, including costs of (i) (a) ICD-related ambulatory visits and transportation, (b) other ambulatory visits, (c) cardiovascular treatments and procedures, and (ii) hospitalizations for the management of cardiovascular events. The ICD and RM system costs were calculated on the basis of the device remaining longevity at the end of the study. The characteristics of the study groups were similar. Over a follow-up of 27 months, the mean non-hospital costs per patient-year were €1695 ± 1131 in the active, vs. €1952 ± 1023 in the control group (P = 0.04), a €257 difference mainly due to device management. The hospitalization costs per patient-year were €2829 ± 6382 and €3549 ± 9714 in the active and control groups, respectively (P = 0.46). Adding the ICD to the non-hospital costs, the savings were €494 (P = 0.005) or, when the monitoring system was included, €315 (P = 0.05) per patient-year.

CONCLUSION

From the French health insurance perspective, the remote management of ICD patients is cost saving.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT00989417, www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Advances in sudden death prevention: the emerging role of a fully subcutaneous defibrillator

Randomized clinical trials support the use of implantable defibrillators for mortality reduction in specific populations at high risk for sudden cardiac death. Conventional transvenous defibrillator systems are limited by implantation-associated complications, infection, and lead failure, which may lead to delivery of inappropriate shocks and diminish survival. The development of a fully subcutaneous defibrillator may represent a valuable addition to therapies targeted at sudden death prevention. The PubMed database was searched to identify all clinical reports of the subcutaneous defibrillator from 2000 to the present. We reviewed all case series, cohort analyses, and randomized trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous defibrillators. The subcutaneous defibrillator is a feasible development in sudden cardiac death therapy and may be useful particularly to extend defibrillator therapy to patients with complicated anatomy, limited vascular access, and congenital disease. The subcutaneous defibrillator should not be considered in patients with an indication for cardiac pacing or who have ventricular tachycardia responsive to antitachycardia pacing. Further investigation is needed to compare long-term, head-to-head performance of subcutaneous defibrillators and conventional transvenous defibrillator systems.

Relevance of guideline-based ICD indications to clinical practice

The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has established itself as life-saving therapy in patients at risk for sudden cardiac death. Remarkable technological advances have made ICDs easier and safer to implant, with improved therapeutic and diagnostic functions and reduced morbidity. Guidelines on ICD indications have been proposed by American and European scientific societies since a number of years, based upon trials and expert opinion. In the context of variable economic and political constraints, it is questionable whether these guidelines may be applied to all settings. This review discusses the guideline-based indications, critically examines their applicability to clinical practice, and discusses alternatives to ICD therapy.

Complications after cardiac implantable electronic device implantations: an analysis of a complete, nationwide cohort in Denmark

Aims

Complications after cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) treatment, including permanent pacemakers (PMs), cardiac resynchronization therapy devices with defibrillators (CRT-Ds) or without (CRT-Ps), and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), are associated with increased patient morbidity, healthcare costs, and possibly increased mortality.

Methods and results

Population-based cohort study in all Danish patients who underwent a CIED procedure from May 2010 to April 2011. Data on complications were gathered on review of all patient charts while baseline data were obtained from the Danish Pacemaker and ICD Register. Adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) with 95% confidence intervals were estimated using binary regression. The study population consisted of 5918 consecutive patients. A total of 562 patients (9.5%) experienced at least one complication. The risk of any complication was higher if the patient was a female (aRR 1.3; 1.1–1.6), underweight (aRR 1.5; 1.1–2.3), implanted in a centre with an annual volume <750 procedures (0–249 procedures: aRR 1.6; 1.1–2.2, 250–499: aRR 2.0; 1.6–2.7, 500–749: aRR 1.5; 1.2–1.8), received a dual-chamber ICD (aRR 2.0; 1.4–2.7) or CRT-D (aRR 2.6; 1.9–3.4), underwent system upgrade or lead revision (aRR 1.3; 1.0–1.7), had an operator with an annual volume <50 procedures (aRR 1.9; 1.4–2.6), or underwent an emergency, out-of-hours procedure (aRR 1.5; 1.0–2.3).

Conclusion

CIED complications are more frequent than generally acknowledged. Both patient- and procedure-related predictors may identify patients with a particularly high risk of complications. This information should be taken into account both in individual patient treatment and in the planning of future organization of CIED treatment.

[Guidelines on the management of implantable cardioverter defibrillators at the end of life]

This article is a joint document of the Spanish Society of Geriatrics and Gerontology, the Spanish Society of Palliative Care and the Section of Geriatric Cardiology of the Spanish Society of Cardiology. Its aim is to address the huge gap that exists in Spain with regard to the management of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in the final stages of life. It is increasingly common to find patients carrying these devices that are in the terminal stage of an advanced disease. This occurs in patients with advanced heart disease and subsequent heart failure refractory to treatment but also in a patient with an ICD who develops cancer disease, organ failure or other neurodegenerative diseases with poor short-term prognosis. The vast majority of these patients are over 65, so the paper focuses particularly on the elderly who are in this situation, but the decision-making process is similar in younger patients with ICDs who are in the final phase of their life.

Are ICD recipients able to foresee if they want to withdraw therapy or deactivate defibrillator shocks?

BACKGROUND

Expert consensus statements on management of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) emphasize the importance of having discussions about deactivation before and after implantation. These statements were developed with limited patient input. The purpose of this study was to identify the factors associated with patients' experiences of end-of-life discussions, attitudes towards such discussions, and attitudes towards withdrawal of therapy (i.e., generator replacement and deactivation) at end-of-life, in a large national cohort of ICD-recipients.

METHODS

We enrolled 3067 ICD-patients, administrating the End-of-Life-ICD-Questionnaire.

RESULTS

Most (86%) had not discussed ICD-deactivation with their physician. Most (69%) thought discussions were best at end-of-life, but 40% stated that they never wanted the physician to initiate a discussion. Those unwilling to discuss deactivation were younger, had experienced battery replacement, had a longer time since implantation, and had better quality-of-life. Those with psychological morbidity were more likely to desire a discussion about deactivation. Many patients (39%) were unable to foresee what to decide about deactivation in an anticipated terminal condition. Women, those without depression, and those with worse ICD-related experiences were more indecisive about withdrawal of therapy. Irrespective of shock experiences, those who could take a stand regarding deactivation chose to keep shock therapies active in many cases (39%).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite consensus statements recommending discussions about ICD-deactivation at the end-of-life, such discussion usually do not occur. There is substantial ambivalence and indecisiveness on the part of most ICD-patients in this nationwide survey about having these discussions and about expressing desires about deactivation in an anticipated end-of-life situation.

Clinical benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator in patients with an ejection fraction > 35% estimated by cardiac magnetic resonance

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator prolongs survival and improves quality of life in advanced heart failure. Traditionally, patients with ejection fraction > 35 estimated by echocardiography have been excluded. We assessed the prognostic impact of this therapy in a group of patients with severely depressed systolic function as assessed by echocardiography but with an ejection fraction > 35% as assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance.

METHODS

We analyzed consecutive patients admitted for decompensated heart failure between 2004 and 2011. The patients were in functional class II-IV, with a QRS ≥ to 120 ms, ejection fraction ≤ 35% estimated by echocardiography, and a cardiac magnetic resonance study. We included all patients (n=103) who underwent device implantation for primary prevention. Ventricular arrhythmia, all-cause mortality and readmission for heart failure were considered major cardiac events. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to systolic function assessed by magnetic resonance.

RESULTS

The 2 groups showed similar improvements in functional class and ejection fraction at 6 months. We found a nonsignificant trend toward a higher risk of all-cause mortality in patients with systolic function ≤ 35% at long-term follow-up. The presence of a pattern of necrosis identified patients with a worse prognosis for ventricular arrhythmias and mortality in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator leads to a similar clinical benefit in patients with an ejection fraction ≤ 35% or > 35% estimated by cardiac magnetic resonance. Analysis of the pattern of late gadolinium enhancement provides additional information on arrhythmic risk and long-term prognosis.

A novel clinical risk prediction model for sudden cardiac death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM risk-SCD)

AIMS

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a leading cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in young adults. Current risk algorithms provide only a crude estimate of risk and fail to account for the different effect size of individual risk factors. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a new SCD risk prediction model that provides individualized risk estimates.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The prognostic model was derived from a retrospective, multi-centre longitudinal cohort study. The model was developed from the entire data set using the Cox proportional hazards model and internally validated using bootstrapping. The cohort consisted of 3675 consecutive patients from six centres. During a follow-up period of 24 313 patient-years (median 5.7 years), 198 patients (5%) died suddenly or had an appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shock. Of eight pre-specified predictors, age, maximal left ventricular wall thickness, left atrial diameter, left ventricular outflow tract gradient, family history of SCD, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, and unexplained syncope were associated with SCD/appropriate ICD shock at the 15% significance level. These predictors were included in the final model to estimate individual probabilities of SCD at 5 years. The calibration slope was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.74, 1.08), C-index was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.68, 0.72), and D-statistic was 1.07 (95% CI: 0.81, 1.32). For every 16 ICDs implanted in patients with ≥4% 5-year SCD risk, potentially 1 patient will be saved from SCD at 5 years. A second model with the data set split into independent development and validation cohorts had very similar estimates of coefficients and performance when externally validated.

CONCLUSION

This is the first validated SCD risk prediction model for patients with HCM and provides accurate individualized estimates for the probability of SCD using readily collected clinical parameters.

Do implantable cardioverter defibrillators improve survival in patients with chronic kidney disease at high risk of sudden cardiac death? A meta-analysis of observational studies

AIMS

Prospective randomized clinical trials show that implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) can reduce the risk of total mortality in select populations. However, data regarding patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are inconclusive. The aim of this study was to evaluate if ICDs affect total mortality in CKD patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Two separate meta-analyses were performed to (i) assess the effect of ICD on all-cause mortality in CKD patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death and (ii) assess the effect of CKD on all-cause mortality in patients who already had an ICD for primary or secondary prevention purposes. Medline and EMBASE were searched from 1966 to 2013. A manual search by cross-referencing was performed. Five observational studies with 17 460 CKD patients considered at high risk of sudden cardiac death were included to evaluate the effect of ICDs on patients with severe CKD. Patients with ICD implants had a reduction in all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.47-0.91, P < 0.05) compared with a matched control group. Based on 15 observational studies with 5233 patients as part of our second comparison that evaluated the effect of CKD on patients who received an ICD, CKD was associated with higher mortality risk (HR = 2.86, 95% CI = 1.91-4.27, P < 0.05) despite an ICD.

CONCLUSION

The meta-analysis indicates that for patients undergoing ICD implant, CKD is associated with greater risk of dying. However, ICD placement reduces mortality in CKD patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death.

Correlation between vectorcardiographic measures and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of the left ventricle in an implantable cardioverter defibrillator population

BACKGROUND

Measures of vectorcardiographic changes and LV remodelling have been associated with arrhythmic risk. However the correlation between the two modalities is not well characterised.

METHODS

We correlated spatial QRS-T angle and ventricular gradient with cardiac MRI derived LV global measures and scar pattern in 66 ICD recipients.

RESULTS

Spatial QRS-T angle was significantly larger in patients with ischaemic scar than those without scar (150°±22° vs. 119°±46°, p=0.01). Larger spatial QRS-T angle was also correlated with more depressed LV function, more dilated LV and larger LV mass. Ventricular gradient azimuth was significantly different between patients with no scar, non-ischaemic scar and ischaemic scar (20°±49° vs. 38°±62° vs. 65°±48°, p=0.009), but independent of spatial QRS-T angle and LV structure.

CONCLUSIONS

Spatial QRS-T angle and ventricular gradient are partially related to LV structural properties. Further investigation is warranted to examine their comparative and combined prognostic value in risk stratification of ventricular arrhythmias.

Do ultrasonic dental scalers interfere with implantable cardioverter defibrillators? An in vivo investigation

OBJECTIVES

To test the in vivo effects of an ultrasonic dental scaler on various implanted cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) models.

METHODS

12 consecutive patients with ICDs had continuous both electrocardiogram monitoring and device interrogation to detect interferences during the use of an ultrasonic dental scaler.

RESULTS

No interferences were detected by any ICD. Evaluation of the electrocardiograms for each patient failed to show any abnormalities in pacing during testing.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that the routinary clinic use of piezoelectric dental scalers do not interfere with the functioning of any of the tested ICDs.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Ultrasonic dental scalers have been suspected of electromagnetic interference (EMI) with the normal functioning of ICDs and the use of this type of equipment for patients with these devices has been controversial. This is the first in vivo study to investigate EMI of ICD activity during the operation with ultrasonic dental scaler.

Electrochemotherapy and heart function: Treatment in a patient with implantable cardioverter defibrillator/pace-maker

Electrochemotherapy (ECT) is a recently described therapy that relies on the permeation of cancer cell membranes by electrical pulses to enhance cytotoxic drug penetration. It has been successfully used in the treatment of primary and metastatic skin cancer. Systemic chemotherapy is the most commonly used therapeutic strategy, and the prevailing orientation calls for the administration of the maximum tolerated dose; however, considerable limitations exist including toxicities to healthy tissues and low achievable drug concentrations at tumor sites. We reported a case of an 83-years-old patient with a laterocervical metastasis of a squamous epidermoidal lip cancer. The patient had a complex medical history and an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)/pace-maker. The lesion was localized in the supraclavicular right side with a distance from the pace-maker/ICD about 5 cm, but the nodule was not deeply located. The ECT was performed under general anesthesia and particular attention we put on the interference with the functioning of the heart. The synchronization algorithm currently implemented in Clinoporator Vitae device coupled with the external triggering device AccuSync proved to be effective in preventing external stimulation of the heart during the so-called vulnerable period of the ventricles. As a result all electroporation pulses in our study were delivered outside the vulnerable period and no heart arrhythmias or any other pathological morphological changes were observed. The safety of treatment was demonstrated also by absence of side effects during and after ECT.

Psychological wellbeing and posttraumatic stress associated with implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in young adults with genetic heart disease

BACKGROUND

Sudden cardiac death is a tragic complication of a number of genetic heart diseases. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy plays an important role in prevention of sudden death. The psychological consequences of ICD therapy in young people with genetic heart disease are poorly understood. This study sought to better understand psychological wellbeing and identify symptoms of posttraumatic stress in young people who had experienced an ICD shock.

METHODS

Eligible patients (ICD implanted over 12 months prior) with an inherited cardiomyopathy or primary arrhythmogenic disorder, enrolled in the Australian Genetic Heart Disease Registry were included. Ninety patients completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Those patients who had an ICD shock (n=31) also completed the Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R).

RESULTS

While the mean HADS-Anxiety and IES-R scores were within the normal range in the total group (n=90), a significant subgroup reported symptoms of anxiety (38%), depression (17%) and posttraumatic stress (31%) indicative of the potential need for referral to clinical care. Overall, greater psychological distress in ICD patients was associated with female gender, a history of syncope, other comorbid medical conditions, and reporting of other distressing events (i.e., ICD complications). In those with an ICD shock, higher posttraumatic stress scores were associated with female gender and longer time to first shock.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with genetic heart diseases can experience psychological difficulties, including anxiety, depression and posttraumatic stress, related to ICD implantation and subsequent shocks. This signals the importance of offering patients access to targeted interventions, including psychological care and support.

Interference between pacemakers/implantable cardioverter defibrillators and video capsule endoscopy

Our Letter to the Editor, related to the article “Small bowel capsule endoscopy in patients with cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators: Outcome analysis using telemetry” by Cuschieri et al, comments on some small errors, that slipped into the authors discussions. The given informations concerning the pacemaker- and implantable cardioverter defibrillators modes were inaccurate and differ between the text and the table. Moreover, as 8 of 20 patient’s pacemakers were programmed to VOO or DOO (“interference mode”) and one patient was not monitored by telemetry during capsule endoscopy, 9 of 20 patients (45%) lack the informations of possible interference between capsule endoscopy their implanted device. Another objection refers to the interpretation of an electrocardiogram (figure 1, trace B) presented: in contrast to the author’s opinion the marked spike should be interpreted as an artefact and not as ”undersensing of a fibrillatory wave”. Finally, three comments to cited reviews were not complete respectively not quoted correctly.

Late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the prediction of ventricular tachyarrhythmic events: a meta-analysis

AIMS

Approaches to the risk stratification for sudden cardiac death (SCD) remain unsatisfactory. Although late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-CMR) for SCD risk stratification has been evaluated in several studies, small sample size has limited their clinical validity. We performed this meta-analysis to better gauge the predictive accuracy of LGE-CMR for SCD risk stratification.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Electronic databases and published bibliographies were systematically searched to identify studies evaluating the association between the extent of LV scar on LGE-CMR and ventricular arrhythmic events [SCD, resuscitated cardiac arrest, the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias, or appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy]. Only studies enrolling patients with CAD or non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy were included. Summary estimates of the relative risk (RR) and likelihood ratios (LRs) were calculated using random effects models. Eleven studies comprising 1105 patients were identified. During a mean/median follow-up of 8.5-41 months 207 patients had ventricular arrhythmic events. Ventricular arrhythmic events were more common in patients with a greater extent of LV scar: RR 4.33 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.98-6.29], positive LR 1.98 (95% CI 1.66-2.37), and negative LR 0.33 (95% CI 0.24-0.46).

CONCLUSION

The extent of LGE on CMR is strongly associated with the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with reduced LVEF and may be a valuable risk stratification tool for identifying patients who will benefit from ICD therapy. However, uncertainties regarding clinical application persist and need to be addressed prior to introduction into broad clinical practice.

Physiotherapy as a Rare Cause of Twiddler's Syndrome in a Patient With an Implanted Cardioverter Defibrillator

A 65-year-old male patient with a history of ischemic cardiomyopathy developed ventricular tachycardia resulting in presyncope. An ICD was indicated for secondary prophylaxis of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. A dual chamber ICD was implanted from the right side because insertion of the device from the left side was unfeasible after surgery of a left subscapularis tendon lesion. ICD implantation and testing of defibrillation threshold were uneventful. During early follow-up a progressive increase of the stimulation threshold was detected. On chest X-ray coiling of both atrial and ventricular leads was noted and caused inadvertently by active shoulder-arm physiotherapy. Complete revision of the ICD system was necessary for restoration of the pacemaker function of the ICD. This unique case highlights important steps for early recognition and prevention of Twiddler’s syndrome that may occur due to physiotherapy treatment even without abnormal manipulations by the patient.

The long QT syndrome: a transatlantic clinical approach to diagnosis and therapy

The mind-boggling progress in the understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the long QT syndrome (LQTS) has been the subject of many articles and reviews. Still, when it comes to the management of the patients affected by this life-threatening disorder, too many errors still take place, both in the diagnostic process and in the therapeutic choices. The price of these errors is paid by the patients and their families. This review is not directed to the relatively small number of LQTS experts who know what to do. It does not deal with genetics, with epidemiology, or with the well-known clinical manifestations. We have focused solely on the approach to diagnosis and therapy and we have directed this review to the average clinical cardiologist who, in his/her practice, sees occasionally patients affected or suspected to be affected by LQTS; the cardiologist who may know enough to manage them but not enough to be completely confident on his/her most critical choices. We have provided our personal views without making any attempt to blend differences whenever present. On most issues we agree fully but where we do not, we make it clear to the reader by indicating who is thinking what. The result may be unconventional, but it mirrors the challenges, often severe, that we all face in managing and protecting these patients from sudden death while also helping them live and thrive despite their diagnosis. We trust that this unabashed presentation of our clinical approach will be useful for both cardiologists and patients.

Cycle length characteristics differentiating non-sustained from self-terminating ventricular fibrillation in Brugada syndrome

AIMS

Limited information is available on self-terminating (ST) ventricular fibrillation (VF). Understanding spontaneous fluctuations in VF cycle length (CL) is required to identify arrhythmia that will stop before shock. Using Brugada syndrome (BS) as a model, the purpose of the study was to compare ST-VF and VF terminated by electrical shock and to look for spontaneous fluctuations in ventricular CL.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Occurrence of ST-VF and VF was studied in 53 patients with 46 VF episodes: (i) spontaneously, (ii) during defibrillation threshold testing, (iii) during programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS). Fifteen presented ST-VF (average duration 25 s): 11 during PVS, 1 during defibrillation threshold testing, and 3 spontaneously (at device interrogation). Self-terminating ventricular fibrillation was compared with 31 VFs terminated by electrical shock. Mean ventricular CL was longer (192.5 ± 22 vs. 149 ± 19 ms) (P < 0.0001) and CL became longer or did not change in ST-VF (187 ± 28 vs. 200 ± 25 ms) (first vs. last CL)(NS) in contrast with progressively shorter CL in electrical shock-terminated VF (177 ± 14.5 vs. 139 ± 12 ms) (first vs. last CL before electrical shock) (P < 0.0001). Ventricular fibrillation had more CL variability (average 16.4 ± 6.5 ms) for the first 50 beats than ST-VF (average 4.08 ± 2) (P < 0.0001). Cycle length range for the first 50 beats was 9.6 ± 1 ms for ST-VF and 44 ± 15 for VF (P < 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Self-terminating ventricular fibrillation in BS was not rare (28%). Ventricular CL was longer and progressively increased or did not change in ST-VF compared with electrical shock-terminating VF. Cycle length variability and CL range could differentiate VF and ST-VF within the first 50 beats. These parameters should be considered in the algorithms for VF detection and termination.

Standard 12-lead electrocardiography measures predictive of increased appropriate therapy in implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients

AIMS

Identification of patients most likely to benefit from implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implant remains a complex challenge. This study aimed to investigate the utility of measures derived from standard 10 s 12-lead electrocardiogrphy (ECG) without complex signal processing in predicting appropriate therapy in an ICD population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We examined 108 ICD patients for primary (n = 32) and secondary prevention (n = 76). Baseline clinical data and characteristics of QRS complex, T-wave, and heart rate from standard 12-lead ECG were examined and related to the occurrence of subsequent appropriate therapy. Over a mean follow-up of 29 ± 11 months, 44% of patients received appropriate therapy. Patients with depressed heart rate variability (HRV) (≤6.5%) were 2.68 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21-5.90, P = 0.015] times more likely to receive appropriate therapy than patients with HRV >6.5%. In patients with bundle branch block (BBB), large QRS dispersion of >39 ms was associated with 2.88 times risk (95% CI 1.24-6.71, P = 0.014) of experiencing appropriate therapy than those with QRS dispersion <39 ms. In patients without BBB, reduced maximum T-wave amplitude (<0.4 mV) were 3.82 times (95% CI 1.63-8.93, P = 0.002) more likely to receive appropriate therapy compared with those with maximum T-wave amplitude >0.4 mV. History of atrial arrhythmia [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.30, 95% CI 1.29-4.12, P = 0.005] and secondary prevention (HR = 2.55, 95% CI 1.14-5.71, P = 0.022) were also predictive of device therapy.

CONCLUSION

Measurements from standard 12-lead ECG were predictive of appropriate therapy in a heterogeneous ICD population. Incorporation of 12-lead ECG parameters such as these into risk stratification models may improve our ability to select patients for ICD implantation.

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator pocket infection caused by Klebsiella pneumonia

Like any other foreign bodies, implanted cardiac devices can become infected. Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphilococci are the most common causes of infections of pacemaker and defibrillator systems. In this case an implantable cardioverter defibrillator pocket infection caused by an extremely rare microorganism, Klebsiella pneumonia, is presented.

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy activation for high risk patients with relatively well preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Does it really work?

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death have used a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% as a critical point to justify implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation in post myocardial infarction patients and in those with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. We compared mortality and ICD activation rates among different ICD group recipients using a cut-off value for LVEF ≤ 35%.

METHODS

We followed up for a mean period of 41.1 months 495 ICD recipients (442 males, 65.6 years old, 68.9% post myocardial infarction patients, 422 with LVEF ≤ 35%). Prevention was considered primary in patients who fulfilled guidelines criteria or had inducible ventricular arrhythmia during programmed ventricular stimulation for patients with LVEF >35%.

RESULTS

Over the course of the trial, 84 of 495 patients died; 69 experienced cardiac death (6 sudden) and 15 non cardiac death. ICD recipients with LVEF ≤ 35% compared to those with preserved LVEF (mean LVEF=43%) had a greater incidence of total mortality (18% vs. 11%, log rank p=0.028) and cardiac death (15.4% vs. 5.5%, log rank p=0.005). There was no difference in the incidence for appropriate device therapy between patients with LVEF ≤ 35% and those with LVEF >35% (56.9% vs. 65.8%, log rank p=0.93). In the multivariate analysis the presence of advanced New York Heart Association stage predicted both total mortality (HR=2.69, 95% CI 1.771-4.086) and cardiac death (HR=3.437, 95% CI 2.163-5.463).

CONCLUSIONS

ICD therapy may protect heart failure patients at early stages from arrhythmic morbidity and mortality, based on an electrophysiology-guided risk stratification approach.

Azygos vein lead implantation for high defibrillation thresholds in implantable cardioverter defibrillator placement

Evaluation of defibrillation threshold is a standard of care during implantation of implantable cardioverter defibrillator. High defibrillation thresholds are often encountered and pose a challenge to electrophysiologists to improve the defibrillation threshold. We describe a case series where defibrillation thresholds were improved after implanting a defibrillation lead in the azygos vein.

AV nodal reentrant tachycardia causing inappropriate ICD shocks in a patient with arrhythmogenic RV dysplasia

We report a patient with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) for arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD) who received inappropriate shocks for atrioventricular node reentry tachycardia (AVRNT). Patient had multiple shocks for tachycardia with EGM characteristics of very short VA interval and CL of 300 msec. An electrophysiologic (EP) study reproducibly induced typical AVNRT with similar features. The slow AV nodal pathway ablation resolved the ICD shocks. Despite increasingly sophisticated discrimination algorithms available in modern ICDs, the ability to differentiate SVT from VT can be challenging. Our patient received inappropriate shocks for AVNRT. When device interrogation alone is not conclusive, an EP study may be necessary to determine the appropriate therapeutic course.

Arrhythmic death and ICD implantation after myocardial infarction

Arrhythmic death remains one of the most important causes of mortality after an acute myocardial infarction also in the revascularization era. As a consequence, identification of patients at risk should be performed before discharge. Unfortunately, in the clinical practice, this evaluation is mainly based on detection of a depressed left ventricular ejection. This approach, however, cannot adequately distinguish arrhythmic versus non-arrhythmic risk.

This issue is of critical relevance when considering that arrhythmic death can be significantly reduced by appropriate interventions of implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Available evidence, however, indicates that in the first month after myocardial infarction, device implantation does not significantly reduce cardiac mortality: it seems that the reduction of arrhythmic death is counterbalanced by an increase in rate of death from non arrhythmic cause. It is therefore to be hoped that, in the future, arrhythmic risk evaluation will be based not only on the extent of left ventricular dysfunction but also on the analysis of other risk markers such as those reflecting autonomic dysfunction, cardiac electrical instability and presence of subclinical inflammation.