The effect of repeated prepulse-blink reflex trials on blink reflex modulation at short lead intervals

The amplitude of a blink reflex is inhibited if the reflex eliciting stimulus is preceded by a short prestimulus (e.g. < 250 ms). If the prestimulus duration is longer than 1 s, blink reflex amplitude is facilitated. The present study investigated the effect of repeated presentations of prestimulus-blink eliciting stimulus pairings on blink reflex modulation. Subjects in Experiment 1 (N = 59) were presented with a sequence of 12 blocks of 7 trials. Within each block, one trial was a blink stimulus alone, whereas the blink stimulus was preceded by a prestimulus on the other trials. Prestimulus intervals were 30, 60, 120, 240, 500 and 2000 ms. Prestimuli were presented continuously throughout the prepulse interval. The amount of reflex magnitude inhibition at the 60, 120, 240 and 500 ms lead intervals and reflex latency shortening at 30 and 60 ms decreased over blocks. The amount of reflex facilitation at a lead interval of 2000 ms was not reduced. In Experiment 2 (N = 22), two groups of subjects were presented with a sequence of blink stimulus alone presentations and prestimulus-blink stimulus pairings. The prestimulus lasted for 120 ms in one group and for 200 ms in the second. Blink reflex magnitude inhibition declined in both groups over blocks of trials. However, the groups also differed in responding on the blink stimulus alone control trials. Experiment 3 (N = 24) employed the same design as did Experiment 2. No difference in control responding was found. Similar to Experiment 2, blink inhibition decreased over repeated trials in both groups. The present results indicate that prepulse inhibition reflects a process which is affected by repeated presentation of prestimulus-reflex stimulus pairings. However, the conclusion that the reduction of prestimulus effects reflects habituation seems to be premature.

Reaction time task as unconditional stimulus. Comparing aversive and nonaversive unconditional stimuli

Nonaversive unconditional stimuli (USs) are seldom used in human classic conditioning of autonomic responses. One major objection to their use is that they produce deficits in electrodermal (ED) second- and third-interval response conditioning. However, a nonaversive reaction time (RT) task that includes feedback of success has been shown to be an effective US while avoiding this disadvantage (Lipp and Vaitl 1988). The present study compared this new RT task (RT-new) with a traditional RT task (RT-old) and with a standard aversive US (shock) in differential classic conditioning of ED, heart rate (HR), and digital pulse volume (DPV) responses. Eight-second-delay differential conditioning was applied in three groups of 12 subjects each. Simple geometric features (square, cross) displayed on a television screen served as conditional stimuli (CS+ and CS-). In acquisition, there were no statistically significant differences among the groups; differential conditioning did occur in HR, first- and second-interval ED responses, and first-interval DPV responses. Separate analyses within each group, however, revealed that there was no second-interval ED conditioning in the RT-old group. During extinction, neither DPV nor second-interval ED conditioning could be obtained, whereas HR and first-interval ED conditioning occurred in each group. In third-interval omission ED responses, RT-old and shock groups exhibited extinction, while response differentiation was maintained in the RT-new group throughout extinction. The RT task including feedback proved to be as reliable a US as a standard aversive US, whereas application of a traditional RT task again yielded some weaknesses in second-interval ED conditioning.

Reaction time task as unconditional stimulus. On conditioning skin conductance responses and heart rate, using a nonaversive unconditional stimulus

The present study was conducted to demonstrate classic conditioning in electrodermal (ED) and heart rate (HR) responses by using a nonaversive reaction time (RT) task as unconditional stimulus (US). Three groups of 12 subjects each were studied to test the efficacy of this US procedure by varying the essential components of the RT task-US between groups. Eight seconds differential delay conditioning was applied in each group. Simple geometric features (square, cross) displayed on a TV screen were used as CS+ and CS-. RT task consisted of a nonaversive tone (72 dBA, 1000 or 1200 Hz) and a motor response (pressing a button with the left index finger). Subjects were asked to respond as soon as the tone stimulus was presented. The three groups received different stimulus sequences during the 16-trial acquisition phase only. In one group (Group C1), CS+ was followed by a tone to which subjects were to respond, whereas CS- was not followed by a tone. Similarly, in a second group (Group H), CS+ was followed by a tone, whereas CS- was not; however, subjects of Group H (habituation group) were not required to respond to the tone. In a third group, (Group C2) CS+ was followed by a tone to which subjects were to respond, while CS- was followed by a different tone requiring no response. According to analysis of Group C1 data, differential conditioning was obtained in each response measure. Group H displayed habituation in each response measure obtained. In Group C2, differential conditioning was obtained in the second latency window of ED responses only.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)