Spitz's nevi with halo reaction: a histopathologic study of 17 cases

Halo reactions to melanocytic nevi are a well-recognized phenomenon. In contrast, halo reactions to Spitz's nevi have been reported only infrequently. Halo reactions may cause misdiagnosis of an otherwise benign nevus as melanoma because inflammatory cells sometimes obscure the architectural features of the underlying nevus, and may induce cytologic atypia. For Spitz's nevus where the distinction between malignancy and benignancy is already challenging, halo reactions compound the problem. We describe 17 examples of Spitz's nevus with halo reaction, and compare their immunohistochemical features with those of "ordinary" halo nevi. Only 2 of 17 lesions demonstrated clinically apparent halos. Clinical follow-up was available for 12 of 17 cases. None of the 12 has persisted at the biopsy site or metastasized after an average 3.6-year follow-up period. Junctional, compound, intradermal, and combined types of Spitz's nevi were represented. All were characterized by symmetrical lymphocytic infiltrates which permeated the full thickness of the nevus, including junctional nests. Combined Spitz's nevi constituted more than one-half of examples in this series (9/17 cases). The combined Spitz's nevus included a combination of Spitz's nevus with either an ordinary (common, banal) nevus or a superficial congenital type nevus. In these combined Spitz's nevi, the lymphocytic response was often directed exclusively to the Spitz's nevic component. Important distinguishing features from malignant melanoma arising in a pre-existing nevus included symmetry and lateral circumscription of the spitzoid component, no large expansile-appearing aggregates of melanocytes, a decrease in size of nests with increasing dermal depth, a lack of mitotic figures among melanocytes at the base, and a symmetrical and diffusely permeative lymphocytic response. Although the combined Spitz's nevus with halo reaction sometimes appeared asymmetrical at scanning magnification, each component of the combination was symmetrical, when examined independently. Probably because of reactive atypia, nuclear maturation with progressive descent into the dermis was sometimes absent. There were no obvious differences in immunohistochemical staining patterns among 4 Spitz's nevi with halo reaction, 5 regressing melanomas, and 5 benign halo nevi when stained with antibodies to S100, HMB-45, OPD4, CD8, TIA-1, CD1a, CD68, and Ki-67.

An immunohistochemical analysis of radiation fibroblasts

A commonly recognized feature of chronic radiation dermatitis is the presence of mesenchymal cells with large atypical nuclei known as radiation fibroblasts. Little is known about their lineage or potential for neoplastic transformation. To investigate these properties, we examined 16 biopsy specimens in which radiation fibroblasts were present with antisera to mesenchymal determinants (FXIIIa, CD34, HHF-35), a proliferation marker (Ki-67), and a tumor-suppressor protein that is overexpressed in many cancers (p53). Radiation fibroblasts were largely negative for the markers of lineage that we employed - only 2 of 16 specimens showed strong expression of FXIIIa, with weak expression in another case. Scattered radiation fibroblasts expressed CD34 in one case. HHF-35 (muscle specific actin) stained small, dendritic cells in the superficial dermis, but not radiation fibroblasts. P53 was not detected within radiation fibroblasts in any of our cases, but was overexpressed by endothelial cells in 2 cases. Ki-67 stained rare endothelial and interstitial cells but not radiation fibroblasts. Radiation fibroblasts are immunophenotypically distinct from dermal dendrocytes and myofibroblasts. They appear to be non-cycling cells, and do not express high levels of p53 despite their marked nuclear atypia. Their phenotype argues against their possible role as progenitors of atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX) and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) which are associated with ionizing radiation-induced skin damage.