Array of micro-epidermal actuators for noninvasive pediatric flexible conductive hearing aids

Corrective surgeries and implantable aids are highly invasive for pediatric patients with conductive hearing loss. Flexible hearing aids are a noninvasive solution to address pediatric hearing loss. These aids generate vibrations on epidermal layer of skin behind the ear using micro-epidermal actuators to bypass the auditory canal. However, the major challenge is to generate a strong level of vibrations that can reach cochlea. Here, we designed, fabricated, and characterized arrays of micro-epidermal actuators to increase the vibration level from the flexible aids, improve frequency response and control the directionality of vibrations. Our human subject study showed that the flexible hearing aid with an array of actuators improved the hearing threshold by an average of 13.8 dB at 500 Hz, compared to a device with a single actuator. Also, the flexible aid with two actuators enhanced the hearing threshold by 30.5 dB at 1 kHz and 20.5 dB across 0.25-8 kHz versus unaided hearing.

Parosmia: Pathophysiology and Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Parosmia is a qualitative olfactory disorder in which there is a mismatch between the memory of an odor and the actual experience triggered by an odor. There has been a surge in parosmia-related publications since the COVID-19 pandemic. This review summarizes the latest clinical findings, theories on pathophysiology and potential treatment options.

RECENT ADVANCES

Potential models of parosmia include peripheral or central hypotheses, which refer to aberrancies in olfactory neuron regeneration or information processing in central olfactory centers respectively. This leads to an incomplete or disorganized pattern of olfactory information relay. Studies using gas chromatography and functional magnetic resonance imaging have identified molecular triggers and intracranial functional connectivity patterns in parosmia respectively. Parosmia tends to occur in a delayed fashion after virus-induced anosmia. It may run a protracted course, but typically improves over time. Currently there are no generally approved, objective ways to ascertain the presence and measure the extent of parosmia. Evidence-based treatment for parosmia remains elusive. In some people, this can lead to health and quality of life issues.

The role of maternal blood elabela levels in the prediction of placenta previa and accreta

INTRODUCTION

Placenta previa and Placenta Accreta Spectrum are life-threatening obstetric conditions that are challenging to diagnose accurately. Currently, there is no biochemical parameter available for their diagnosis. The aim of our study is to investigate the potential of Elabela as a laboratory marker that could predict placenta previa and placenta accreta, both of which can lead to severe, life-threatening complications for the mother.

METHODS

In this study, which was conducted prospectively in two tertiary centers between 2020 and 2022, Elabela levels were examined in patient groups with placental insertion and invasion anomalies. SPSS program was used for comparative statistical analysis between groups.

RESULTS

Of the 67 analyzed patients, 32 were in the control group, 12 were in the previa group, and 23 were in the accreta group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding age, BMI, number of curettages, presence of previous cesarean section, and smoking status. The Elabela level was measured at 135.6 ± 72.1 in the control group, 988.3 ± 925.5 in the previa group, and 376 ± 364.6 in the accreta group, with a statistically significant difference between the groups. The cut-off value of Elabela levels in the previa group was determined to be 304, with a sensitivity of 83.30 % and a specificity of 83.60 % (AUC = 0.909). In the accreta group, the cut-off value was 195.5, with a sensitivity of 60.90 % and a specificity of 61.40 % (AUC = 0.658).

DISCUSSION

By showing that the prediction of placenta previa and placenta acreata can be made with a biochemical parameter in our study, young researchers will focus more on this subject and thus make many contributions to science.

Proposed computed tomography severity index for the evaluation of invasive fungal sinusitis: Preliminary results

BACKGROUND

Invasive fungal sinusitis (IFS) can present as a mild disease to life-threatening infection. A recent surge in cases was seen due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Many patients require surgical debridement and hence imaging [contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) of the paranasal sinuses (PNS)] to document the extent of the disease. However, there was no scoring system using CECT to describe the severity of IFS. This study proposes a computed tomography (CT) severity index (CTSI) to describe the severity of rhino-orbital-cerebral involvement in symptomatic COVID-19 patients and hypothesizes that higher CTSI correlates with disease severity and thus slow response/non-response to treatment.

AIM

To propose a scoring system using CECT to describe the severity of IFS and correlate it with clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A prospective study on 66 COVID-19 positive patients with CECT PNS done for IFS was performed. Split-bolus single-phase CT technique was used. Based on the extent of involvement, a CTSI was designed. Disease in four major subsite areas was assessed. Each subsite involvement was given points according to this model and then summated. Based on the final summated CTSI, the disease was classified as mild, moderate, or severe. Two subsets were subsequently analyzed including survival and death; and responders and non-responders.

RESULTS

The study cohort was 66 COVID-19-positive patients with suspected IFS with a median age of 48.5 years. Mild disease was noted in 34 (51.52%), moderate in 28 (42.42%), and severe disease in 4 (6.06%) patients. There was a significant association of mortality and poor clinical response (P = 0.02) with disease bilaterality. Laterality and CTSI were significant predictors of response to treatment. The mean CTSI of responders was 6.3, of non-responders was 12.9 and the response to treatment was significantly associated with CTSI (t-test, P < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (Liu method) to distinguish between responders and non-responders showed that the cut-off value for CTSI of 11 had a sensitivity of 78.26% and a specificity of 95.35% to predict response assessment.

CONCLUSION

CTSI can help in quantification of the disease burden, mapping out disease extent, triaging patients, and response assessment; especially patients with underlying comorbidities. A higher score would alert the clinician to initiate aggressive treatment, as severe disease correlates with slow response/non-response to the treatment.

Exploring the Hearing Improvement and Parental Stress in Children with Hearing Loss Using Hearing Aids or Cochlear Implants

Objectives: This study aims to describe the stress levels experienced by parents of children with hearing loss who use conventional hearing aids or cochlear implants, and to assess the correlation between parental stress and the auditory skills acquired by the children. Methods: The study was conducted at the Policlinic "Gaetano Martino" in Messina, evaluating data from 42 pairs of parents of children using hearing aids or cochlear implants. Parents completed the LittlEARS Auditory Questionnaire (LEAQ) and the Parental Stress Scale (PSS) 18 months after the initial device (hearing aid or cochlear implant) had been activated. Additionally, information was collected regarding the presence of peripartum issues (including preterm birth) or associated conditions, congenital hearing loss, the total number of children in the family, and the number of children with hearing loss in the family. Results: Significant differences were found in the months to effective stimulation (p = 0.026), the age of the children at the time of the survey (p = 0.024) and the PSS score (p = 0.029). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression revealed significant correlations between LEAQ scores and both the months to effective stimulation and the age of the children at the time of the survey; univariate and multivariate linear regression revealed significant correlations between PSS scores and the type of device, months to effective stimulation, age of the children at the time of the survey, peripartum issues, and the number of children. A Spearman correlation showed a positive relationship between LEAQ and age of the children at the time of the survey, and a negative correlation between the PSS scores and the age of the children at the time of the survey. Conclusions: Parents of children with cochlear implants reported higher stress levels than those with children using hearing aids, although auditory performance was comparable between groups. Improved auditory performance was associated with reduced parental stress. The PSS and LEAQ are effective tools used in clinical practice for assessing parental stress and tracking auditory recovery, respectively.

Call for Decision Support for Electrocardiographic Alarm Administration Among Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Staff: Multicenter, Cross-Sectional Survey

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that electrocardiographic (ECG) alarms have high sensitivity and low specificity, have underreported adverse events, and may cause neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) staff fatigue or alarm ignoring. Moreover, prolonged noise stimuli in hospitalized neonates can disrupt neonatal development.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to conduct a nationwide, multicenter, large-sample cross-sectional survey to identify current practices and investigate the decision-making requirements of health care providers regarding ECG alarms.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide, cross-sectional survey of NICU staff working in grade III level A hospitals in 27 Chinese provinces to investigate current clinical practices, perceptions, decision-making processes, and decision-support requirements for clinical ECG alarms. A comparative analysis was conducted on the results using the chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis, or Mann-Whitney U tests.

RESULTS

In total, 1019 respondents participated in this study. NICU staff reported experiencing a significant number of nuisance alarms and negative perceptions as well as practices regarding ECG alarms. Compared to nurses, physicians had more negative perceptions. Individuals with higher education levels and job titles had more negative perceptions of alarm systems than those with lower education levels and job titles. The mean difficulty score for decision-making about ECG alarms was 2.96 (SD 0.27) of 5. A total of 62.32% (n=635) respondents reported difficulty in resetting or modifying alarm parameters. Intelligent module-assisted decision support systems were perceived as the most popular form of decision support.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the negative perceptions and strong decision-making requirements of NICU staff related to ECG alarm handling. Health care policy makers must draw attention to the decision-making requirements and provide adequate decision support in different forms.

Emerging complications in the era of COVID-19 vaccination: role of radiologists and imaging

COVID-19 was declared as a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) in March 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic became a major public health burden with a high morbidity and mortality rate. In response to the pandemic, several COVID-19 vaccines were introduced to prevent infection and control the transmission of the virus. These vaccines have proven to be effective and relatively safe causing mild side effects in most individuals. However, these vaccines have also been associated with rare but life-threatening complications involving multiple body systems including the pulmonary, cardiovascular, lymphatic, vascular, gastrointestinal, and the central and peripheral nervous systems. This article describes the various severe complications and highlights the role of radiologists and imaging in aiding the prompt recognition of vaccine associated complications allowing for improved patient management.

Post-COVID-19 Related Rhinocerebral Mucormycosis in Bulgaria: A Report of Three Cases

Rhinocerebral mucormycosis is a rare and rapidly progressive fungal infection caused by opportunist fungi from the Mucoraceae family, which are omnipresent in nature. Fungal sporangiospores discharged into the atmosphere could be inhaled or directly penetrate damaged skin and mucosa, and they strongly prefer angioinvasive spread. These relatively rare and opportunistic infections have spiked in recent years, particularly during the coronavirus disease identified in 2019 (COVID-19). Herein, we describe a series of three cases of rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis (ROCM) during the second and third waves of COVID-19 in Bulgaria. The average age of the patients was 60.3 years (range 40-73, standard deviation ± 17.8). All of them contracted COVID-19 prior to developing ROCM and have a common comorbidity: type II diabetes mellitus. One of the cases was further complicated with a cerebral abscess as a result of ROCM. All patients underwent surgical treatments, and full recovery was achieved in two of the cases. In the third case, despite the extent of surgical and pharmaceutical treatment, ROCM progressed to a stable chronic disease.

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss during the Covid-19 pandemic; experience of a tertiary referral center

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to highlight the differences in the clinical management and treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) due to the impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

METHODS

This study compared patients diagnosed with SSNHL between March 2020 and March 2022, following the first reported case of COVID-19 in our country, with patients diagnosed between March 2018 and March 2020. The evaluation encompassed demographic characteristics, comorbidities, other ear-related complaints, hearing loss thresholds at each frequency, medical treatment administered, treatment duration, and post-treatment follow-up audiograms.

RESULTS

The demographic characteristics and comorbidities of patients before and during the pandemic showed similar distribution. There was no significant difference in the duration from the onset of symptoms to hospital admission during the pandemic compared to the previous period. When evaluating the treatment responses of hospitalized and treated patients according to Siegel's criteria during the pandemic, a similar trend to the pre-pandemic period was observed. It was noted that the use of systemic steroids and hyperbaric oxygen therapy decreased during the pandemic period, while the use of antivirals increased.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study conducted as a reference center, we want to emphasize that no clear data indicating a relationship between COVID-19 infection and NHL. Also, we believe that COVID-19 infection does not affect the course and prognosis of SSNHL.

Association of COVID-19 Vaccination With Changes in Smell and Taste

Since the introduction of vaccines for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in the United States, there has been significant vaccine hesitancy, in part due to fear of adverse effects. We sought to investigate the rates of smell and taste changes after COVID-19 vaccination compared to other common vaccines. Our study cohort included individuals identified by Current Procedural Terminology code in the TriNetX database receiving the COVID-19 first series, COVID-19 booster, influenza, tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis (TDAP), or pneumococcal vaccines between December 15, 2020, and August 15, 2023. After 1:1 propensity score matching, postvaccination incidence of disturbance of smell and taste was significantly less likely after COVID-19 first series vaccine compared to influenza (odds ratios, OR: 0.27 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.20-0.36]), TDAP (OR: 0.35 [95% CI: 0.26-0.47]), and pneumococcal vaccines (OR: 0.17 [95% CI: 0.09-0.32]). Similarly, incidence of disturbance of smell and taste was significantly less likely after COVID-19 booster vaccine compared to the influenza (OR: 0.60 [95% CI: 0.48-0.76]), TDAP (OR: 0.63 [95% CI: 0.47-0.85]), and pneumococcal vaccines (OR: 0.44 [95% CI: 0.28-0.68]). This study builds upon the literature demonstrating the safety of COVID-19 vaccination.

Validating the splicing effect of rare variants in the SLC26A4 gene using minigene assay

BACKGROUND

The SLC26A4 gene is the second most common cause of hereditary hearing loss in human. The aim of this study was to utilize the minigene assay in order to identify pathogenic variants of SLC26A4 associated with enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) and hearing loss (HL) in two patients.

METHODS

The patients were subjected to multiplex PCR amplification and next-generation sequencing of common deafness genes (including GJB2, SLC26A4, and MT-RNR1), then bioinformatics analysis was performed on the sequencing data to identify candidate pathogenic variants. Minigene experiments were conducted to determine the potential impact of the variants on splicing.

RESULTS

Genetic testing revealed that the first patient carried compound heterozygous variants c.[1149 + 1G > A]; [919-2 A > G] in the SLC26A4 gene, while the second patient carried compound heterozygous variants c.[2089 + 3 A > T]; [919-2 A > G] in the same gene. Minigene experiments demonstrated that both c.1149 + 1G > A and c.2089 + 3 A > T affected mRNA splicing. According to the ACMG guidelines and the recommendations of the ClinGen Hearing Loss Expert Panel for ACMG variant interpretation, these variants were classified as "likely pathogenic".

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified the molecular etiology of hearing loss in two patients with EVA and elucidated the impact of rare variants on splicing, thus contributing to the mutational spectrum of pathogenic variants in the SLC26A4 gene.

A treatment-focused approach to medical investigations for hearing loss in infants

This integrative review synthesises two related but distinct fields: Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) and Medical Investigation of Childhood Hearing Loss. Both fields involve medical evaluations for permanent hearing loss, yet they differ in their perspectives, timing, and target populations. By integrating these bodies of literature, this review introduces a novel, treatment-focused approach to the medical investigation of permanent prelingual hearing loss. Given that the first two years of life represent a critical period for neural plasticity and brain development, this approach holds significant potential for improving patient outcomes. Additionally, it offers opportunities to enhance clinical efficiency and advance equity in the management of childhood hearing loss.

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss: audiological profile during the COVID-19 pandemic

Introduction

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is an otological emergency that requires prompt recognition and intervention to prevent devastating impacts on people's lives. During the COVID-19 pandemic, sensory deprivations have been reported in patients positive for SARS-CoV-2 virus, including deleterious effects on the auditory pathway. This study aims to describe the audiological profile of individuals with SSNHL during the COVID-19 pandemic and to correlate hearing recovery in subgroups of individuals with or without COVID-19.

Methods

Prospective cohort including patients diagnosed with SSNHL evaluated in a tertiary care center between March 2020 and September 2022. Hearing loss was confirmed with pure-tone and speech audiometry, with Speech Recognition Threshold (SRT) and word recognition score (WRS). Audiometric testing was performed at the moment of diagnosis, then 7, 30 and 120 days after diagnosis. The average degree of hearing loss was assessed by calculating the 4-frequency pure tone average (4fPTA). The investigation of COVID-19 included RT-PCR technique for the SARS-CoV-2 virus and collection of information regarding disease severity. A statistical analysis was performed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model to compare the 4fPTA between the four groups (with and without a history of COVID-19, unilateral and bilateral cases) at the end of the follow-up period.

Results

Fifty-two patients with SSNHL were assessed, 40 (76.9%) with unilateral and 12 (23.1%) with bilateral hearing loss, totaling 64 ears included. Of those, 15 (28.8%) patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and were symptomatic for COVID-19. Of all unilateral cases, 22.5% were seropositive and showed symptoms of COVID-19, a number that increased to 50% for bilateral cases. Comparing the COVID-19 positive groups, individuals with unilateral SSNHL went from 40 dB as their average 4fPTA at onset to 20 dB as their average 4fPTA after 120 days, whereas those with bilateral SSNHL went from an initial average of 60 dB to a final average of 66 dB. Although the 4fPTA value of individuals with unilateral SSNHL improved in 7 days, the mean values showed no significant difference between positive and negative groups. There was a higher incidence of bilateral simultaneous SSNHL in patients who had not been vaccinated against COVID-19 and who presented with symptoms of severe COVID-19.

Conclusion

Infection with SARS-CoV-2 resulted in more severe SSNHL, in bilateral SSNHL, and in poorer recovery from SSNHL in bilateral cases. Bilateral SSNHL was seen more frequently in patients who had not received vaccination against COVID-19.

Ocular manifestations of COVID-19

There is an increasing body of knowledge regarding how COVID-19 may be associated with ocular disease of varying severity and duration. This article discusses the literature on the ocular manifestations associated with COVID-19, including appraisal of the current evidence, suggested mechanisms of action, associated comorbidities and risk factors, timing from initial infection to diagnosis and clinical red flags. The current literature primarily comprises case reports and case series which inevitably lack control groups and evidence to support causality. However, these early data have prompted the development of larger population-based and laboratory studies that are emerging. As new data become available, a better appraisal of the true effects of COVID-19 on the eye will be possible. While the COVID-19 pandemic was officially declared no longer a "global health emergency" by the World Health Organization (WHO) in May 2023, case numbers continue to rise. Reinfection with different variants is predicted to lead to a growing cumulative burden of disease, particularly as more chronic, multi-organ sequelae become apparent with potentially significant ocular implications. COVID-19 ocular manifestations are postulated to be due to three main mechanisms: firstly, there is a dysregulated immune response to the initial infection linked to inflammatory eye disease; secondly, patients with COVID-19 have a greater tendency towards a hypercoagulable state, leading to prothrombotic events; thirdly, patients with severe COVID-19 requiring hospitalisation and are immunosuppressed due to administered corticosteroids or comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus are at an increased risk of secondary infections, including endophthalmitis and rhino-orbital-mucormycosis. Reported ophthalmic associations with COVID-19, therefore, include a range of conditions such as conjunctivitis, scleritis, uveitis, endogenous endophthalmitis, corneal graft rejection, retinal artery and vein occlusion, non-arteritic ischaemic optic neuropathy, glaucoma, neurological and orbital sequelae. With the need to consider telemedicine consultation in view of COVID-19's infectivity, understanding the range of ocular conditions that may present during or following infection is essential to ensure patients are appropriately triaged, with prompt in-person ocular examination for management of potentially sight-threatening and life-threatening diseases.

Comparison of Patient Characteristics and Olfactory Sensitivity for Trigger Odorants in Parosmia and Phantosmia

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the characteristics of patients with qualitative olfactory dysfunction (qualOD) and whether individuals with parosmia exhibit increased olfactory sensitivity to previously reported odorous triggers of parosmia.

METHODS

This study included individuals aged ≥18 years, divided into quantitative OD only, parosmia, and phantosmia groups. Data collected included: clinical-demographic data, "Sniffin' Sticks" scores, questionnaires (depression scale, importance of olfaction), and information about parosmia and phantosmia. A proportion of patients underwent trigger odor threshold testing for 2-Furfurylthiol [FFT] found in coffee and 2,6-nonadienal [Nonadienal] found in cucumber.

RESULTS

Those with parosmia were typically younger women, with shorter OD duration due to post-viral OD (PVOD), hyposmic/normosmic, and experienced parosmia more severely. Parosmia was 3.5 times more likely in PVOD. Those with phantosmia were older, with longer OD duration due to idiopathic OD, hyposmic/anosmic, and experienced phantosmia less severely. There were no significant differences between FFT and Nonadienal threshold scores in patients with parosmia, phantosmia, or only quantitative OD, but all groups had significantly increased olfactory sensitivity for trigger odors compared to phenyl ethyl alcohol (PEA).

CONCLUSION

Parosmia and phantosmia patients have distinct characteristics. This may provide clinicians with a better understanding of possible olfactory outcomes in these patients. The higher olfactory sensitivity of all groups to trigger odors compared to PEA raises interesting points about parosmia triggers and odors in the context of warning for danger, in relation to the pathophysiology of parosmia that may be worth exploring in future studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 134:3277-3285, 2024.

Bilateral, Sequential Sudden Hearing Loss in a Patient With Multiple COVID-19 Infections and Potential Implications on Subsequent Cochlear Implant Performance

Viruses are often implicated as a cause of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), particularly sudden cases, including COVID-19. Determining the viral mechanism that leads to hearing loss is necessary for its future prevention and treatment. The 47-year-old woman who is the subject of this case study presented with sudden SNHL following multiple infections of COVID-19. Following a trial of a contralateral routing of sound device, she received a right cochlear implant (CI). Following a period of high performance, additional cases of COVID-19 infection and device failure issues resulted in the explant/reimplant of 1 ear and implantation of the contralateral ear. Despite extensive rehabilitation after these events, the patient continues to experience difficulties in speech understanding, not reaching her initial high levels of right ear performance. Further research is needed to determine the implications of COVID-19 as it relates to SNHL. This case study aimed to highlight the course of treatment and provide insight into the impact of COVID-19 on sudden hearing loss and its relationship to CI performance.

Aesthetic Reconstruction Based on Facial Subunit Principle for Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Face: A Retrospective Analysis

Background and objective Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common malignancy of the skin. Reconstruction of post-excisional defects in BCC should follow the subunit principle for better outcomes. The location of BCC of the face is determined based on facial units; however, very few studies have described the involvement of multiple units and multiple subunits in BCC. In this study, we aimed to provide valuable insights into the management of BCC involving various facial units and subunits, thereby contributing to improved patient care and outcomes. Materials and methods We conducted a retrospective study at the Plastic Surgery Department of the SCB Medical College in Cuttack, Odisha, from January 2020 to January 2022, after obtaining ethical approval from the SCB Medical College IRB (no: 1155). We examined 35 patients with BCC of the face. The inclusion criteria were as follows: patients with early-stage and primary tumors that were mobile, not attached to underlying bone or cartilage, and amenable to surgical resection. Conversely, patients with late-stage, neglected, and recurrent tumors, fixed tumors, or those infiltrating the underlying bone or cartilage were excluded from the study. Data collection involved retrieving pertinent information from medical records, including parameters such as age, sex, tumor site, type of flap utilized, follow-up, and any complications observed. The tumor sites were further divided into six separate groups based on facial aesthetic units: the forehead, the nose, the area around the eyes, the cheek, the mouth, and the area around the ear, each with its own subunits. Results A total of 35 patients were included in this study, comprising 15 males (42.85%) and 20 females (57.15%), with a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.33. The ages of the patients ranged from 42 to 68 years. Among the facial units, the nose was the most commonly involved (in seven cases), while the lip was the least commonly affected (in one case). In 24 cases, a single unit was involved, while 11 cases involved multiple units. Furthermore, single subunits were affected in 18 cases, double subunits in 10 cases, three subunits in five cases, four subunits in one case, and five subunits in another case. Notably, no cases exhibited flap necrosis, wound dehiscence, wound hematoma, or seroma, indicating excellent surgical outcomes. All flaps remained viable, and all patients were followed up for a minimum of one year, with no reported recurrence during the follow-up period ranging from 6 to 18 months, reaffirming the effectiveness of the treatment approach. Conclusions For small, superficial lesions, full-thickness skin grafts (FTSG) are a suitable treatment option. However, when dealing with larger lesions that encompass multiple subunits, the preferred approach involves reconstructing with locoregional flaps. It is essential to plan the procedure carefully, taking into account the goal of positioning the final scar along the junction of facial subunits. This strategic plan aims to achieve superior aesthetic outcomes.

Subjective Smell Disturbances in Children with Sars-Cov-2 or Other Viral Infections do not Correspond with Olfactory Test Results

BACKGROUND

Olfactory dysfunction associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in children has not been verified by a validated olfactory test. We aimed to determine whether these complaints are objectifiable (test-based hyposmia), how often they occur during acute SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to other upper respiratory tract infections (URTI), as well as in children recovered from COVID-19 compared to children with long COVID.

METHODS

Olfactory testing (U-sniff test; hyposmia<8 points) and survey-based symptom assessments were performed in 434 children (5-17 years; 04/2021-06/2022). 186 symptom-free children served as controls. Of the children with symptoms of acute respiratory tract infection, SARS-CoV-2 PCR test results were positive in 45 and negative in 107 children (URTI group). Additionally, 96 children were recruited at least 4 weeks (17.6±15.2 weeks) after COVID-19, of whom 66 had recovered and 30 had developed long COVID.

RESULTS

Compared to controls (2.7%), hyposmia frequency was increased in all other groups (11-17%, p<0.05), but no between-group differences were observed. Only 3/41 children with hyposmia reported complaints, whereas 13/16 children with complaints were normosmic, with the largest proportion being in the long-COVID group (23%, p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Questionnaires are unsuitable for assessing hyposmia frequency in children. Olfactory complaints and hyposmia are not specific for SARS-CoV-2 infection. The number of complaints in the long-COVID group could result from aversive olfactory perception, which is undetectable with the U-sniff test.

Prevalence and Factors Associated with Olfactory Dysfunction in Individuals with COVID-19 in Brazil: A Study of 20,669 Cases from 2020 to 2021

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to determine the prevalence and factors associated with olfactory dysfunction in individuals with COVID-19 in the first 2 years of the pandemic in Brazil.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a prevalent study involving the confirmed cases of COVID-19 recorded in the municipality between the years 2020 and 2021. Individuals symptomatic for COVID-19, with a positive laboratory result and aged 12 or older were included in this study. Measures of central tendency and dispersion were used in the description of continuous variables and frequency was used for categorical variables. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to evaluate data distribution.

RESULTS

Data from 20,669 individuals were analyzed. The prevalence of olfactory disorders was 17.9% and increased from 11.5% to 21.9% between 2020 and 2021. A female gender predominance was observed among individuals who reported anosmia, with 61.1% (n = 564) in 2020 and 61.7% (n = 1,713) in 2021. On the other hand, the median age of individuals with olfactory disorders was lower than that of the group without disorders (35 [IQR 27-46] vs. 39 [IQR 29-50]; p < 0.001). Smell disturbances were present in 18.2% (n = 3,634) of patients who recovered and in 7.1% (n = 38) of those who died. Furthermore, in 2021, a prevalence rate of 30.6% for olfactory disorders was linked to obesity as a comorbidity.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of olfactory disorders was lower compared to other studies, with cough and fever being negatively related to olfactory dysfunction and headache, coryza, and taste disorders being positively related. Obesity was the only associated comorbidity.

[Cochleovestibular manifestations in coronavirus infection]

One of the main causes of the of the inner ear pathology is a viral infection including SARS-CoV-2 virus. On the other hand the psycho-emotional state of patients also affects patients with hearing loss, tinnitus and dizziness, and an increase in depression and anxiety was revealed during the period of self-isolation. Goal of our study was to analyze cochleovestibular pathology in patients with COVID-19. The study involved 84 patients and the leading complaint was hearing loss - in 70 patients, tinnitus - in 54 patients, dizziness - in 50 patients. In addition, an increased anxiety background was found in patients, as well as signs of depression. Thus, the 2020 pandemic period was a high risk period for patients with inner ear pathology, which may be associated not only with the actual pathological effect of the virus on the auditory and vestibular system, but also with changes in the psycho-emotional status of patients.

Intranasal insulin for COVID-19-related smell loss

BACKGROUND

Quantitative (hyposmia and anosmia) and qualitative (phantosmia and parosmia) olfactory disorders are common consequences of COVID-19 infection found in more than 38% of patients even months after resolution of acute disease. SARS-CoV-2 has tropism for angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in the respiratory system, suggesting that it is the mechanism of damage to the olfactory neuroepithelium and of involvement at the central nervous system. The olfactory bulb is the organ with the highest insulin uptake in the central nervous system. Insulin increases the production of Growth Factors (GF); therefore, in this study, the administration of intranasal insulin is proposed as a viable treatment for olfactory disturbances. The aim of this study was to obtain improvement in olfaction after 4 weeks of intranasal insulin administration in a group of patients presenting chronic olfactory disturbances secondary to COVID-19 infection, quantified using the Threshold, Discrimination, and Identification (TDI) score based on the Sniffin Sticks®.

METHODS

Experimental, longitudinal, prolective and prospective study of patients with a previous diagnosis of COVID-19 in the last 3-18 months and who persisted with anosmia or hyposmia. The sample size was calculated with "satulator". The intervention was performed from January to May 2022. Throughout four appointments, a baseline olfactory measurement was obtained using the TDI score based on the Sniffin Sticks® test. In the first three appointments, Gelfoam® cottonoids soaked in 40 IU of NPH insulin were placed on the nasal roof of each nostril for 15 min. Descriptive statistics, student's paired t test and a multiple linear regression were utilized to ascertain statistical significance of the outcome on the TDI score obtained on the fourth and final appointment.

RESULTS

27 patients were included in the study. Table 1 summarizes the sample characteristics. The results exhibit that 93% of the sample had an improvement. The initial mean TDI score was 67% (63-71) compared to the final mean of 83% (80-86, p < 0.01). TDI subsection analysis is shown in Table 2. There was no significant difference in pre-intervention and post-intervention glucose measurements after the intranasal insulin administration.

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of intranasal insulin has promising results, pointing towards an alternative of treatment for chronic olfactory disturbances secondary to neuroepithelial damage caused by upper respiratory tract infections. Furthermore, this is the first study to use a three-point assessment of olfaction in post-COVID-19 patients, while using the Sniffin Sticks® TDI score adapted to Latin Spanish.

Olfactory Epithelium Infection by SARS-CoV-2: Possible Neuroinflammatory Consequences of COVID-19

Background

The loss of smell is a typical diagnostic symptom of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This sensorial deprivation may be expressed as quantitative (anosmia or hyposmia) or qualitative (dysosmia) alterations as a consequence of anatomical disturbances of the nasal epithelium structure. The olfactory system sends direct neuronal connections to brain structures that are involved in emotional processing, including deep temporal nuclei. This anatomical and functional feature may be related to the occurrence of emotional disorders among COVID-19 patients.

Summary

We identify a possible sequence of events, from typical olfactory dysfunction that is associated with COVID-19 and caused by olfactory epithelium damage to disturbances in the quality of life and emotional state of infected patients that is attributable to possible neuroinflammatory processes. Sensorial deprivation causes deleterious actions on mood, negatively affecting quality of life. Olfactory dysfunction that is associated with COVID-19 occurs concurrently with psychological distress, symptoms of anxiety, and depressive disorders and impinges on self-perceived quality of life.

Key Messages

Changes in mood are certainly associated with multiple factors, including the environment and isolation, but the observation that the virus may penetrate the central nervous system through the olfactory bulb and the connection between the olfactory system and prefrontal and orbitofrontal cortices and the amygdala-hippocampus do not allow one to discard neural factors that are involved in the pathophysiology of emotional symptoms in post-COVID-19 patients. Behavioral symptoms of COVID-19 involve local olfactory actions and the participation of central neuronal systems.

Sudden Hearing Loss Waves: The Effect of COVID-19 Infection and Vaccination on the Inner Ear

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) has emerged as a potential complication of COVID-19 infection and vaccination. Various mechanisms by which the SARS-CoV-2 virus can cause hearing loss have been reported, including direct viral invasion, neuroinflammation, blood flow disturbances, and immune-mediated response. However, the temporal relationship between COVID-19 infection and SSNHL remains unclear, with mixed findings and conflicting results reported in different studies. Similarly, while anecdotal reports have linked COVID-19 vaccination to SSNHL, evidence remains scarce. Establishing a correlation between COVID-19 vaccines and SSNHL implies a complex and multifactorial pathogenesis involving interactions between the immune system and the body's stress response. Nevertheless, it is important to consider the overwhelming evidence of the vaccines' safety and efficacy in limiting the spread of the disease and remains the primordial tool in reducing death.

A review on the impacts of COVID-19 on the auditory system: Implications for public health promotion research

Background

Currently, there are few studies on the relationship between COVID-19 and the auditory system. In the current study, a review of the studies conducted in the fields of etiopathology, clinical manifestations, research, and treatment of hearing loss caused byCOVID-19 was conducted, which can be used as a baseline for future studies.

Methods

We utilized the research approach suggested by Arksey and O'Malley to carry out this scoping review. Search was conducted in Farsi and English with a focus on the onset of hearing loss in patients with COVID-19 through Medline and PubMed, and Google Scholar search engine. Studies included were those involving adult patients diagnosed with COVID-19 who experienced hearing loss, ear pain, ear discharge, and otitis media. Studies were eligible for inclusion if there was a description of the otologic dysfunction, specifically onset, duration, or clinical outcomes.

Results

Among 90 studies identified, 35 studies were included in the review process. Our findings suggest several possible mechanisms for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) in COVID-19 patients, and COVID-19 infection could have deleterious effects on the inner ear, specifically on the hair cells of the cochlea despite patients being asymptomatic and early identification of SSNHL in COVID-19patients can save the hearing and also patient.

Conclusion

Hearing loss in COVID-19 infection has not received much attention by health care professionals. Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), tinnitus, and/or vertigo have been shown to occur during and following COVID-19 infection. Due to lack of research studies, and the inconsistency and even contradictory of the findings, it remains questionable whether COVID-19 contributes to the high incidence of hearing loss. The proper understanding of the mechanisms behind hearing loss in COVID-19 infections needs further research. However, it seems likely that SNHL could be included among the manifestations of those-called "long COVID" syndrome.

Coronavirus disease 2019 related parosmia: an exploratory survey of demographics and treatment strategies

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical features, therapeutic efficacy and symptom time course of post-coronavirus disease 2019 parosmia.

METHODS

A 22-item online questionnaire was distributed to AbScent research group and Facebook coronavirus disease 2019 anosmia group adult members to assess clinical features, interventions and their subjective efficacy for parosmia.

RESULTS

A total of 209 participants (86 per cent females) reported: smell loss on average 3 days after coronavirus symptoms, recovery 4 weeks later, and first parosmia symptoms 12 weeks post infection. Respondents reported 10 per cent body weight loss, and listed onion and garlic as significant parosmia triggers. Regarding quality of life, depression was the most cited item (54 per cent). Smell training was trialled by 74 per cent of participants, followed by nasal corticosteroid spray (49 per cent). Stellate ganglion block, trialled by 16 per cent of respondents, had the highest reported improvement (45 per cent), with 21 per cent reporting a sustained benefit - the highest rate amongst registered treatment options.

CONCLUSION

Post-coronavirus parosmia has a significant impact and remains challenging to treat. Stellate ganglion block appears to be successful relative to other reported treatments. Further research into the pathophysiology, efficacy and mechanism of stellate ganglion block effect is warranted.

Orthonasal and retronasal odor identification in patients with parosmia

OBJECTIVE

To compare retronasal and orthonasal perception in parosmic COVID-19 patients, in order to determine whether COVID-19 has a differential effect on these functions.

METHODS

Using the Sniffin Sticks test battery orthonasal function was examined for odor threshold, discrimination and identification. Retronasal function was assessed using 20 tasteless aromatized powders. Gustatory function was measured using the Taste Strips test.

RESULTS

This study included 177 patients (127 women, 50 men; mean age 45 years), of whom 127 (72%) were hyposmic and 50 (28%) normosmic. Compared to patients without parosmia, parosmic patients performed worse in odor identification for both orthonasal (F = 4.94, p = 0.03) and retronasal tests (F = 11.95, p < 0.01). However, an interaction effect between route of odor identification (orthonasal or retronasal) and parosmia status was found (F = 4.67, p = 0.03): patients with parosmia had relatively lower retronasal scores than patients without parosmia.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that COVID-19 may affect the olfactory mucosa differently along the anterior-posterior axis, thereby possibly contributing to the pathophysiology of parosmia. Patients with parosmia also exhibit a higher degree of impairment when odors are presented through the retronasal route during eating and drinking.

Clinical Profile and Outcome Analysis of Ear-Nose-Throat Symptoms in SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Subvariant Infections

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of ear-nose-throat (ENT) symptoms in SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infected patients resulting from local transmission. Methods: A convenience sampling network survey was conducted among individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 to examine the characteristics and progression of ENT symptoms associated with local transmission. The survey comprised 52 questions, and univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were employed to assess the rate, severity, and outcome of ENT symptoms across different genders and age groups. Results: Among the 1,366 individuals included in the investigation, a peak in new infections occurred on 20th December, and the majority (78.4%) were female. The most common symptoms reported were coughing (90.6%), nasal congestion (77.2%), and runny nose (74.3%). Otologic symptoms were predominantly represented by tinnitus (29.7%). Conclusion: The rate of specific symptoms showed a significant correlation with age and gender. It is crucial to provide timely medical intervention, especially for female patients. This study offers a comprehensive understanding of the symptom spectrum in individuals infected with the virus, providing valuable insights for the development of targeted symptom management strategies.

Arthroscopic Xenograft With Cerclage Fixation: A Method for Glenoid Bone Loss Reconstruction With Cerclage Fixation Using a Specific Posterior Guide

Large glenoid bone defects are closely associated with high failure rates after arthroscopic Bankart repair in chronic anterior shoulder instability; therefore nowadays the glenoid bone grafting reconstruction procedure is strictly recommended. On the contrary, the optimal grafting procedure is still controversial because there is considerable concern about the resorption rate of allografts, donor site morbidity of the autografts, and sequelae caused by the use of metal fixation devices in proximity of the shoulder joint. We describe an all-arthroscopic technique for anatomic reconstruction of the glenoid that uses a previously shaped xenograft assembled with a metal-free fixation device using 2 ultra-high-strength sutures (FiberTape Cerclage System; Arthrex, Naples, FL), using a specific posterior guide (Arthrex, Naples, FL) in combination with upper third subscapularis augmentation.

Gene mutations as a non-invasive measure of adult cochlear implant performance: Variable outcomes in patients with select TMPRSS3 mutations

BACKGROUND

The cochlear implant (CI) has proven to be a successful treatment for patients with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss, however outcome variance exists. We sought to evaluate particular mutations discovered in previously established sensory and neural partition genes and compare post-operative CI outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Utilizing a prospective cohort study design, blood samples collected from adult patients with non-syndromic hearing loss undergoing CI were tested for 54 genes of interest with high-throughput sequencing. Patients were categorized as having a pathogenic variant in the sensory partition, pathogenic variant in the neural partition, pathogenic variant in both sensory and neural partition, or with no variant identified. Speech perception performance was assessed pre- and 12 months post-operatively. Performance measures were compared to genetic mutation and variant status utilizing a Wilcoxon rank sum test, with P<0.05 considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Thirty-six cochlear implant patients underwent genetic testing and speech understanding measurements. Of the 54 genes that were interrogated, three patients (8.3%) demonstrated a pathogenic mutation in the neural partition (within TMPRSS3 genes), one patient (2.8%) demonstrated a pathogenic mutation in the sensory partition (within the POU4F3 genes). In addition, 3 patients (8.3%) had an isolated neural partition variance of unknown significance (VUS), 5 patients (13.9%) had an isolated sensory partition VUS, 1 patient (2.8%) had a variant in both neural and sensory partition, and 23 patients (63.9%) had no mutation or variant identified. There was no statistically significant difference in speech perception scores between patients with sensory or neural partition pathogenic mutations or VUS. Variable performance was found within patients with TMPRSS3 gene mutations.

CONCLUSION

The impact of genetic mutations on post-operative outcomes in CI patients was heterogenous. Future research and dissemination of mutations and subsequent CI performance is warranted to elucidate exact mutations within target genes providing the best non-invasive prognostic capability.

Characteristics of smell and taste disorders depending on etiology: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

This study investigates the impact of etiology on the epidemiologic profile, disease severity, type of treatment and therapy outcome in smell and taste disorders.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of 270 patients that presented with a smell or taste disorder in a specialized, tertiary care center. An established questionnaire was used to collect data from patients and physicians. Olfactometry was performed with the Sniffin' Sticks test kit, while gustometry was performed by taste strips.

RESULTS

Post-traumatic etiology was associated with young age (median 46 years) and male sex, and showed the most severe degrees of smell loss compared to other etiologies (64.3% anosmia). Postinfectious causes occurred more frequently in females (77.3%) and correlated with a history of pharyngeal surgery, suggesting a vulnerability for virally mediated sensory dysfunction following adenoid/tonsil removal. Parosmia also correlated with both postinfectious etiology (62.5%) and female sex. In sinunasal etiology, the presence of nasal polyps worsened the overall olfactory test score by approximately 50%. In particular, smell threshold and discrimination were reduced, while smell identification was not significantly impacted by nasal polyp obstruction. Sinunasal dysfunction was the only etiology to show significant improvement after therapy (73.9% improved). Finally, we could establish good correlations between the subjective impairment and objective dysfunction for each sensory modality.

CONCLUSION

Each etiology of chemosensory dysfunction shows particular distributions of variables like sex, age, comorbidities and operations, disease severity, sensory threshold, discrimination and identification. This paper offers a detailed account of the correlations between the cause and the characteristics of smell and taste loss.

Long COVID, the Brain, Nerves, and Cognitive Function

SARS-CoV-2, a single-stranded RNA coronavirus, causes an illness known as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Long-term complications are an increasing issue in patients who have been infected with COVID-19 and may be a result of viral-associated systemic and central nervous system inflammation or may arise from a virus-induced hypercoagulable state. COVID-19 may incite changes in brain function with a wide range of lingering symptoms. Patients often experience fatigue and may note brain fog, sensorimotor symptoms, and sleep disturbances. Prolonged neurological and neuropsychiatric symptoms are prevalent and can interfere substantially in everyday life, leading to a massive public health concern. The mechanistic pathways by which SARS-CoV-2 infection causes neurological sequelae are an important subject of ongoing research. Inflammation- induced blood-brain barrier permeability or viral neuro-invasion and direct nerve damage may be involved. Though the mechanisms are uncertain, the resulting symptoms have been documented from numerous patient reports and studies. This review examines the constellation and spectrum of nervous system symptoms seen in long COVID and incorporates information on the prevalence of these symptoms, contributing factors, and typical course. Although treatment options are generally lacking, potential therapeutic approaches for alleviating symptoms and improving quality of life are explored.

Neurofilament Expression as a Biomarker of Post-COVID-19 Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL) affects a patient's quality of life and requires rapid treatment. The etiology is viral, vascular, and autoimmune, even though, in most cases, it remains idiopathic SSHL. Since 2019, several different complications have been identified following COVID-19 infection. The post-COVID-19 ENT manifestations reported in the literature are sore throat, headache, pharyngeal erythema, nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, upper respiratory tract infection, and tonsil enlargement. Cases of SSHL, vestibular neuronitis, and audio-vestibular disorders (such as tinnitus, dizziness, and vertigo) have also been reported, albeit in a smaller percentage of patients. We reported our experience of a case of post-COVID-19 SSHL in the absence of any other type of post-COVID symptoms or brain and internal auditory canal magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance angiography modifications. We aimed to identify a serological biomarker of sudden sensorineural hearing loss, and we also dosed and monitored the value of the serum neurofilament light (NfL). the best of our knowledge, this is the first report that associates SSHL and the serological increase in NfL as a potential biomarker of neuronal-disease-related damage.

Elabela is a reliable biomarker for predicting early onset preeclampsia: A comparative study

BACKGROUND

Preeclampsia (PE) is a multisystemic metabolic disease with an undetermined etiology. PE is a worldwide cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity, subdivided into early (EoPE) and late-onset (LoPE) according to 34 wk of gestation as a divider. Many researchers investigated biomarkers for predicting PE to halt its consequences on the feto-maternal outcome. Elabela (Ela) is a newly discovered peptide hormone that was implicated in PE pathogenesis. Earlier rodent studies discussed Ela’s role in controlling blood pressure. Moreover, Ela deficiency was associated with PE development.

AIM

To test whether plasma Ela could serve as a reliable marker for predicting PE based on the time of onset (EoPE vs LoPE) compared to age and body mass matched healthy controls since no definitive treatment exists for PE but to terminate a pregnancy.

METHODS

This case-control study recruited (n = 90) pregnant who fulfilled inclusion criteria; they were allocated into three groups: EoPE (30/90) (< 34 wk of gestation); LoPE (30/90) (≥ 34 wk of gestation); and healthy pregnant (30/90). Demographic criteria; biochemical, hematological, and maternal plasma Ela levels were recorded for comparison.

RESULTS

Serum Ela was significantly reduced in EoPE compared to LoPE and healthy controls (P = 0.0023). The correlation confirmed a strong inverse relationship with mean atrial blood pressure (r = -0.7, P < 0.001), while gestational age and platelets count showed a moderate correlation with (r = 0.4 with P < 0.0001). No correlation was confirmed between the body mass index (BMI) and urine albumin. The predictive ability of 25 centile serum Ela had an Odds ratio of 5.21, 95% confidence interval (1.28, 21.24), P = 0.02 for predicting EoPE. The receiver operator characteristic curve defined the Ela cutoff value at > 9.156 with 96.7% and 93.3% sensitivity and specificity, P < 0.0001 in predicting EoPE.

CONCLUSION

A strong correlation of serum Ela with PE parameters with excellent sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing EoPE independent of the BMI, age, and blood pressure which makes Ela a recommendable marker in screening. Further research is warranted to explore prognostic and therapeutic applications for Ela in PE.

Transient Anosmia and Dysgeusia in COVID-19 Disease: A Cross Sectional Study

Objective

This study aims to explore the prevalence of anosmia and dysgeusia and their impact on COVID-19 patients.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study. Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between 1st October 2020 and 30th June 2021 were randomly selected from a national COVID-19 registry. COVID-19 cases were diagnosed using molecular testing method which measured the viral E gene. The Anosmia Reporting Tool, and a brief version of the questionnaire on olfactory disorders were used to measure the outcomes via telephone interviews. Data were analysed using SPSS 27 statistics software.

Results

A total of 405 COVID-19 adults were included in this study, 220 (54.3%) were males and 185 (45.8%) were females. The mean±SD age of participants was 38.2 ± 11.3 years. Alterations in the sense of smell and taste were reported by 206 (50.9%), and 195 (48.1%) of the patients, respectively. Sex and nationality of participants were significantly associated with anosmia and dysgeusia (p < 0.001) and (p-value=0.001) respectively. Among patients who experienced anosmia and dysgeusia, alterations in eating habits (64.2%), impact on mental wellbeing (38.9%), concerns that the alterations were permanent (35.4%), and physical implications and difficulty performing activities of daily living (34%) were reported.

Conclusion

Anosmia and dysgeusia are prevalent symptoms of COVID-19 disease, especially among females. Although transient, anosmia and dysgeusia had considerable impact on patient's life. Neuropsychological implications of COVID-19 in acute infection phase and prognosis of anosmia and dysgeusia in COVID-19 are areas for further exploration.

An online survey on clinical characteristics of otologic symptoms linked to COVID-19 infection

Objective

To report the otologic symptoms that present in patients with COVID-19 infection and investigate the pathogenic characteristics during the period of the pandemic.

Materials and methods

This cross-sectional descriptive study included participants with COVID-19 infection. COVID-19 infection was verified in these patients by nucleic acid test or antigen test. An online questionnaire was developed to analyze the association between the COVID-19 pandemic and the characteristics of otologic symptoms.

Results

This study included 2,247 participants, of which nearly half had one or more otologic symptoms. The presents of otologic symptoms were associated with gender (OR = 1.575, p < 0.0001), age (OR = 0.972, p < 0.0001), and occupation (healthcare worker: p < 0.0001; personnel of enterprises or institutions: OR = 1.792, p < 0.0001; student: OR = 0.712, p < 0.044). The otologic symptoms following COVID-19 infection in order were vertigo (25.95%), tinnitus (19.05%), otalgia (19.00%), aural fullness (17.18%), hearing loss (11.62%), otorrhea (1.25%), and facial paralysis (0.27%).

Conclusion

The present study shows that otologic symptoms are common among the COVID-19 infected participants and that these symptoms mostly recover spontaneously. During the corona-virus pandemic, the involvement of the cochleovestibular system and facial nerve should not be overlooked while treating the COVID-19 infected individuals.

Parosmia and altered taste in patients recovering from Covid 19

Parosmia is a well-documented consequence of smell loss associated with Covid 19. Those who experience this qualitative olfactory disorder during recovery find that the odour of common foods and household items is distorted, and the experience can range from merely altered to profoundly disgusting. This can lead to a greatly altered relationship with food, including the physical symptoms of loss of appetite, nausea, vomiting, as well as wider reaching issues such as withdrawal from social situations, emotional distancing from others in their close social circles, and anhedonia. There is at present no known cure or intervention to mitigate the condition. The AbScent Parosmia and Phantosmia support group on Facebook became an important resource for patients with this condition during the early part of the pandemic, and the crowd-sourcing of experiences, tips and peer-to-peer advice became a valuable source of information for the community as well as researchers trying to understand the condition. Using protocols described in earlier literature on the use of social media for qualitative research, this paper provides information on the management of parosmia based on the experiences of over 30k patients in the AbScent Parosmia and Phantosmia group on Facebook and 6k member of the AbScent Network.

Late onset and persistent parosmia and dysgeusia as neurosensorial complication by the SARS virus COV 2

About the neurological manifestations of COVID-19, smell impairment with some distortion or parosmia is currently one of the longest-lasting post-covid sequelae affecting many young adults around the world, we present a case of a 25yo patient that after the COVID-19 infection initiates with anosmia and dysgeusia of difficult control and some weeks later begins with parosmia associated to general discomfort and vomiting preceded by nausea, accompanied by poor oral intake, generating weight loss in 3 weeks, and depression probably related to the clinical profile and the confinement due to the pandemic. She was treated with prednisone, gabapentin, nasal irrigations and olfactory rehabilitation, with mild improvement, which was greater after the second dose of covid-19 vaccine.

Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Patients with Long-COVID-19: Objective and Behavioral Audiometric Findings

Introduction

The symptoms of COVID-19 are primarily respiratory system disorders. Sensorineural hearing loss can be caused by COVID-19, as other symptoms in the nervous system. Hearing loss may also be the only symptom or complication of this disease or the symptoms of long COVID-19. The study aimed to assess hearing in patients after COVID-19 infection.

Material and Methods

The study conducted ENT and full hearing assessment in COVID-19 infection. All patients underwent complete audiological diagnostics, including threshold tonal audiometry, tympanometry, otoacoustic emissions, and auditory brainstem evoked potentials (ABR) tests. The study group included 58 patients aged 23 to 75 years who were diagnosed with COVID-19 infection six months before inclusion in the present study and reported post-COVID-19 hearing impairment.

Results

There were statistically significant differences between the control and study groups. Sensorineural hearing loss was found in 65.5% of the tonal audiometry test. The stapes reflex was absent in almost 20% of post-COVID-19 patients. The analysis of ABRs demonstrated longer latencies of wave III, V, and time intervals I-III, I-V in post-COVID-19 patients.

Conclusion

COVID-19 can damage the inner ear as well as the auditory pathway. Hearing loss may be the only symptom of COVID-19 or be a late complication of the disease due to postinfectious inflammation of the nerve tissue as a symptom of long COVID-19. Prolonged conduction of the auditory pathway shows the affinity of the virus to the nervous system as a symptom of long COVID. It is advisable to perform hearing diagnostics in patients after COVID-19 and provide them with specialist care.

Cochlear Implant After Sudden Onset Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Case Report

We present an uncommon case of a pediatric patient with sudden-onset sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL), a medical condition in which a person experiences a rapid loss of 30 or more decibels within a matter of hours or days. The patient is a nine-year-old female who, two years prior, suddenly lost hearing in her left ear after a 24-hour episode of nausea, vomiting, and left ear pain. She presented to our clinic two years after the episode, long after the window for evidence-based treatment for acute SSNHL, such as corticosteroid therapy or antivirals, had passed. However, she remembered the moment of her hearing loss vividly, an uncommon occurrence in pediatric patients. CT, MRI, family history, and physical exam were unremarkable. The patient had a brief hearing aid trial where she described being able to hear the sound but did not have any clarity in understanding the sound. The patient was ultimately treated with a unilateral cochlear implant and showed excellent subjective and audiogram responses. Continued research on the management of SSNHL in pediatric patients who present outside of the acute therapeutic window is needed.

Qualitative Olfactory Dysfunction and COVID-19: An Evidence-Based Review with Recommendations for the Clinician

BACKGROUND

Nearly 40% of patients who experience smell loss during SARS-CoV-2 infection may develop qualitative olfactory dysfunction, most commonly parosmia. Our evidence-based review summarizes the evolving literature and offers recommendations for the clinician on the management of patients experiencing parosmia associated with COVID-19.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search using independent queries in PubMed, Embase, Ovid, and Cochrane databases, then categorized articles according to themes that emerged regarding epidemiology, effect on quality of life, disease progression, prognosis, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of parosmia.

RESULTS

We identified 123 unique references meeting eligibility and performed title and abstract review with 2 independent reviewers, with 74 articles undergoing full-text review. An inductive approach to thematic development provided 7 central themes regarding qualitative olfactory dysfunction following COVID-19.

CONCLUSIONS

While other respiratory viruses are known to cause qualitative olfactory disturbances, the incidence of parosmia following COVID-19 is notable, and correlates negatively with age. The presence of parosmia predicts persistent quantitative olfactory dysfunction. Onset can occur months after infection, and symptoms may persist for well over 7 months. Affected patients report increased anxiety and decreased quality of life. Structured olfactory training with essential oils is the preferred treatment, where parosmia predicts recovery of aspects of quantitative smell loss when undergoing training. There is limited evidence that nasal corticosteroids may accelerate recovery of olfactory function. Patients should be prepared for the possibility that symptoms may persist for years, and providers should guide them to resources for coping with their psychosocial burden.

Parosmia and Phantosmia: Managing Quality Disorders

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this review was to summarize the current knowledge on parosmia and phantosmia and introduce support and treatment algorithms for the two qualitative olfactory disorders.

Recent Findings

Recent literature regarding parosmia has revealed that patients with the disorder are mainly triggered by certain substances, including thiols and pyrazines. In 2015, the existing "olfactory training" regimen was improved to more effectively treat post-infectious olfactory loss and was named "modified olfactory training" (MOT). It was also found in 2022 that MOT is also effective against COVID-19-induced parosmia.

Summary

Parosmia, the distortion of smells, is a symptom in qualitative olfactory disorders that severely affects patients' mental well-being and enjoyment of their everyday lives. The condition was first documented in 1895 and can affect up to 5% of the general population. Etiologies of parosmia include sinonasal diseases, viruses, surgeries, traumatic brain injury, neurological and psychiatric conditions, toxic chemicals, and medications. Parosmia has seen a surge in cases since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and is linked to changes in brain structure following an infection. The evaluation of the symptom is done using surveys, smell identification tests, fMRI, MRI, PET/CT, and gas chromatography. Treatment for parosmia can vary in duration, which makes it essential to focus not only on helping the patients regain normosmia, but also on supporting the patient through the recovery journey. Parosmia should not be confused with phantosmia, in which the distortion of smells occurs in the absence of olfactory stimuli. The etiology of phantosmia can vary from infections and traumatic brain injury to psychiatric disorders like schizophrenia. Unlike parosmia, the treatment of phantosmia is less straightforward, with an emphasis on determining the etiology and providing symptomatic relief.

Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Accumulating data indicate that patients with COVID-19 could be affected by sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). The aim of the study was to analyze the epidemiological and clinical trend of SSNHL occurrence during the COVID-19 pandemic by applying a systematic review and meta-analysis approach.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane databases were searched.

RESULTS

The seven included studies had adequate relevance to the topic and the quality was fair. The mean age at SSNHL onset ranged from 39.23 to 62.18 years during the pandemic year period (PYP); a meta-analysis of four studies comparing these data with those of previous periods in the same institutions found a younger age during the PYP (pooled mean -0.2848). The heterogeneity was high (76.1935%) and no frank asymmetry was observed in the funnel plot. The SARS-CoV-2 positivity rate of SSNHL patients ranged from 0% to 57.53%. Standard steroid treatments were applied without significant adverse effects. Comprehensively, hearing improvement was achieved for more than half of the cases. No studies reported long-term follow-up data.

CONCLUSIONS

Further prospective analyses on large series and a long-term follow up on COVID-related SSNHL cases are necessary to address the open questions regarding the causative link between COVID-19 infection and SSNHL.

Omicron targets upper airways in pediatrics, elderly and unvaccinated population

Omicron, a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 variant, has spread around the globe, causing dramatic increases in infection rates. Viral mutant antigens were responsible for the strong infectivity, fast replication, and high reinfection rates reported from all ages. Omicron causes clinical symptoms mostly related to the upper respiratory tract with minimal symptoms from the lower respiratory tract besides an urgent presentation of cases that resembled a fatal illness, epiglottitis. Not to mention the long coronavirus disease 2019, which rises exponentially in the Omicrons era. Apparently, the disease has a less aggressive course than earlier variants with lower death rates; however, the infection is not trivial. Severe infection was raised among pediatrics, unvaccinated, and the elderly. Complete vaccine protection is urgently needed to protect the most vulnerable community members. Additionally, self-protective strategies such as wearing a mask and safe social distancing cannot be omitted.

C-Reactive protein role in assessing COVID-19 deceased geriatrics and survivors of severe and critical illness

Numerous risk variables, including age, medical co-morbidities, and deranged inflammatory response, lead to higher mortality in a senior population with coronavirus disease 2019. C-reactive protein (CRP), an acute phase inflammatory protein secreted by the liver, was tested in the elderly, showing a diagnostic and prognostic role. However, recent research has shed light on new applications for CRP in geriatrics. It was used as a follow-up marker and as a therapeutic target. Early and accurate identification of patients' risks may mitigate the devastation of the invading virus in older cases and permit the implementation of a quick treatment plan for those most likely to deteriorate.

COVID-19-related Rhino-orbital-cerebral Mucormycosis

Background: There is an increasing number of COVID-19-related Rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis (ROCM), especially from India.

Objectives: To evaluate the demographic, clinical, radiological, and outcome of the COVID-19-related ROCM cases in a single center.

Materials and Methods: The medical records of the patients with COVID-19-related ROCM were retrospectively reviewed. The study covered 22 months duration from March 2020 to December 2021 in Imam Hussain Medical City, Karbala city, Iraq.

Results: Of the 14 patients with COVID-19-related ROCM, there were 71.4% males with a male-to-female ratio of 2.5:1. The median age was 61 years (age range: 27-80 years). There were 42.9% of patients with a history of being a current smoker. All patients had a history of DM, and 57.1% of patients had a history of hypertension. All patients were without a history of the previous episode of COVID-19 or taking the vaccine. The median duration from the COVID-19 diagnosis to the diagnosis of ROCM was 19 days (duration range of 10-40 days). Most of the cases were of severe type (57.1%). All of the patients were taking corticosteroid and oxygen therapy. Nasal obstruction, nasal discharge, cheek swelling, and necrotic tissue were clinical features in all patients. The majority of the cases were on the left side (71.4%). Stage 3 was found in 42.9%. Amphotericin B was used for all patients and surgical debridement in 13 cases. Five patients have died (35.7%).

Conclusion: COVID-19-related ROCM is an aggressive disease associated with a high mortality rate of 35.7%. Early diagnosis and on-time initiation of treatment are recommended to get the best outcome.

Clinical factors associated with lower health scores in COVID-19-related persistent olfactory dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Patients with persistent COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction (OD) commonly report parosmia. Understanding the impact of COVID-19 OD and parosmia is critical to prioritizing research and interventions. In this study we investigate the impact of parosmia and other clinical and disease characteristics on health state utility values (HUVs) for those with persistent COVID-19 OD.

METHODS

Patients with a history of COVID-19 diagnosis and persistent OD were recruited from a tertiary medical center and a social media support forum for chemosensory dysfunction. Clinical characteristics and disease-specific symptoms were obtained along with self-reported history of smell function and presence of parosmia. HUVs were calculated using indirect (EuroQol 5-Dimension [EQ-5D]) and direct (VAS) measures.

RESULTS

Our study included 286 subjects (75.52% women) with persistent COVID-19-related OD. Results (mean ± standard deviation) of HUVs based on EQ-5D and VAS were 0.81 ± 0.14 and 0.73 ± 0.21, respectively. Mean self-reported smell function (on a 0-10 scale) was 9.67 ± 1.25 pre-COVID-19, 0.93 ± 2.34 at diagnosis, and 3.39 ± 2.32 at most current assessment. A total of 89.16% of the subjects reported parosmia and 24.13% sought medical care for anosmia. Seeing an MD for OD (p < 0.001), female gender (EQ-5D only, p = 0.002), a history of chronic pain (p < 0.05) and depression/anxiety (EQ-5D only, p < 0.001) predicted worse health. Parosmia and persistent symptoms, such as shortness of breath, were associated with lower EQ-5D and VAS scores, but did not independently predict poorer health scores on multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSION

Persistent COVID-19 OD results in health states comparable to other chronic diseases.

Ear, nose, and throat manifestations of COVID-19 and its vaccines

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a highly infectious disease and was designated a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) on March 11, 2020. There are no classical manifestations of the disease. The most prevalent symptoms include fever, cough, dyspnea, myalgia and headache. The main route of transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 is through the upper respiratory tract. Therefore, it is not strange to find different ear, nose and throat (ENT) symptoms in individuals infected with this virus. Olfactory dysfunction is a common feature of COVID-19; either it is the only presenting symptom or it accompanies other manifestations of the disease. Other otolaryngological features such as sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL), dysphonia, nasal obstruction, sore throat, etc. are less frequent manifestations of COVID-19. These features, in addition, to being presented early in the disease process, certain long-standing symptoms like parosmia, dysphonia, and persistent deafness, are other characteristics of the disease. Geographical variation in otorhinolaryngological prevalence is another problem with this debilitating disease. Local and systemic adverse effects (local site injection pain, fever, myalgia, headache, and others) of the COVID-19 vaccines are more frequent than otolaryngological side effects (anosmia, hyposmia, Bell’s palsy, SSNHL, etc.). We aimed in this review to summarize the early and persistent ENT symptoms of COVID-19 or after the various COVID-19 vaccines.

Analysis of Prevalence and Predictive Factors of Long-Lasting Olfactory and Gustatory Dysfunction in COVID-19 Patients

Background: Although smell and taste disorders are highly prevalent symptoms of COVID-19 infection, the predictive factors leading to long-lasting chemosensory dysfunction are still poorly understood. Methods: 102 out of 421 (24.2%) mildly symptomatic COVID-19 patients completed a second questionnaire about the evolution of their symptoms one year after the infection using visual analog scales (VAS). A subgroup of 69 patients also underwent psychophysical evaluation of olfactory function through UPSIT. Results: The prevalence of chemosensory dysfunction decreased from 82.4% to 45.1% after 12 months, with 46.1% of patients reporting a complete recovery. Patients older than 40 years (OR = 0.20; 95% CI: [0.07, 0.56]) and with a duration of loss of smell longer than four weeks saw a lower odds ratio for recovery (OR = 0.27; 95% CI: [0.10, 0.76]). In addition, 28 patients (35.9%) reported suffering from parosmia, which was associated with moderate to severe taste dysfunction at the baseline (OR = 7.80; 95% CI: [1.70, 35.8]). Among the 69 subjects who underwent the UPSIT, 57 (82.6%) presented some degree of smell dysfunction, showing a moderate correlation with self-reported VAS (r = −0.36, p = 0.0027). Conclusion: A clinically relevant number of subjects reported persistent chemosensory dysfunction and parosmia one year after COVID-19 infection, with a moderate correlation with psychophysical olfactory tests.

Drug-Associated Parosmia: New Perspectives from the WHO Safety Database

Parosmia is a qualitative distortion of smell perception. Resulting from central causes, sinonasal diseases, and infections, parosmia has also been associated with medications. Therefore, we aimed to investigate potential signals for drugs associated with parosmia. VigiBase® (the WHO pharmacovigilance database) was queried for all reports of “Parosmia” (MedDRA Preferred Term), registered up to 23 January 2022. Disproportionality analysis relied on the reporting odds ratio and the information component. A signal is detected when the lower end of the 95% confidence interval of the information component is positive. We found 14,032 reports of parosmia, with a median patient age of 53 years. Most reported drugs were antiinfectives, among which COVID-19 vaccines accounted for 27.1% of reports. Antibiotics and corticosteroids were involved in 6.8% and 4.6% of reports. Significant disproportionate reporting was detected for corticosteroids, antibiotics, drugs used in nicotine dependence, COVID-19 and HPV vaccines, serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI), and incretin mimetics. We suggest potential safety signals involving nicotine replacement therapies and vaccines. We also highlight the potential role of less suspected classes, such as SNRIs and incretin mimetics. An iatrogenic etiology should be evoked when parosmia occurs, especially in the elderly.