1
|
Basaran AE, Arlt F, Güresir E, Vychopen M, Wach J. Sexual dysfunction after surgery for primary sporadic cranial meningiomas: prevalence and risk factors. J Neurooncol 2024:10.1007/s11060-024-04817-w. [PMID: 39254812 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04817-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2024] [Accepted: 08/28/2024] [Indexed: 09/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although postoperative quality of life (QoL) has been studied in relation to a variety of aspects following meningioma resection, the impact of meningiomas on sexual life has not been investigated. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of cranial meningioma surgery on patients' postoperative sexual life. METHODS A standardized questionnaire, anonymous and based on the Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (ASEX), was sent to 87 patients who had been selected for participation in the study based on the following criteria: a postoperative Karnofsky performance of ≥ 80 and below 60 years of age at diagnosis. RESULTS 53 patients (53/87; 61%) responded to the survey. The study identified eleven patients (20.8%) who reported sexual dysfunction (SD) according to ASEX criteria. Six of these patients were women (55%) and five were men (45%). Univariable analysis revealed that SD was observed with greater frequency in patients with non-skull base tumors (p = 0.006) and in those with a left-hemispheric meningioma (p = 0.046). Multivariable analysis revealed that non-skull base tumor location is the only independent factor being associated with SD (OR = 5.71, 95% CI = 1.02-31.81, p = 0.047). CONCLUSION This first investigation of sexual functioning post-surgery for cranial meningiomas indicates that SD is a prevalent issue among non-skull base meningioma patients. Consequently, we recommend that pre- and postoperative sexual health should be further addressed in future QoL investigations of cranial meningioma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alim Emre Basaran
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Felix Arlt
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Erdem Güresir
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Martin Vychopen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Johannes Wach
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Acquaye‐Mallory A, Vera E, Choi A, Wall K, Gilbert MR, Armstrong TS. Identifying associations between sample characteristics, symptoms, and self-efficacy differences in adult patients with rare tumors of the central nervous system who participated in a novel web-based natural history study. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e70017. [PMID: 39101481 PMCID: PMC11299073 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2024] [Revised: 06/28/2024] [Accepted: 07/05/2024] [Indexed: 08/06/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE High self-efficacy is associated with improved self-care and reduced symptoms in cancer patients but has not been fully interrogated in adults with central nervous system (CNS) cancers. We aimed to identify the relationship between self-efficacy levels in managing emotions (SEMEM) and social interactions (SEMSI) by examining sample characteristics and symptom burden. METHODS Sample characteristics and patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures addressing self-efficacy (PROMIS SEMEM & SEMSI) and symptom burden (MDASI BT or SP) were collected in a novel web-based study of 158 adult patients diagnosed with rare CNS tumors. RESULTS The sample was predominantly female (73%), diagnosed with an ependymoma (66%), and had a median age of 45 (19-75). Low SEMEM was associated with a longer duration of symptoms before surgery (r = -0.26) and female gender (92%) among brain tumor (BT) participants and in spinal cord tumors (SCT), those with lower education (r = 0.29). Reporting low SEMSI was associated with being married (42%), lower education (r = 0.22), and a prolonged time with symptoms before surgery (r = 0.29) in those with BTs, with no associations identified in SCT. More severe mood-related interference (including mood, enjoyment of life, and relationship with others) was associated with lower SEMEM among both locations (r = -0.61 brain, r = -0.28 spine) and SEMSI in BT participants (r = -0.54). CONCLUSIONS Low self-efficacy was linked to a prolonged time between symptom onset and initial surgery, education, gender, and marital status and was associated with higher mood-related interference. Understanding characteristics associated with low self-efficacy underscores a need for future studies to tailor interventions that enhance self-efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alvina Acquaye‐Mallory
- Neuro‐Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer ResearchNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of HealthBethesdaMarylandUSA
| | - Elizabeth Vera
- Neuro‐Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer ResearchNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of HealthBethesdaMarylandUSA
| | - Anna Choi
- Neuro‐Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer ResearchNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of HealthBethesdaMarylandUSA
| | - Kathleen Wall
- Neuro‐Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer ResearchNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of HealthBethesdaMarylandUSA
| | - Mark R. Gilbert
- Neuro‐Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer ResearchNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of HealthBethesdaMarylandUSA
| | - Terri S. Armstrong
- Neuro‐Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer ResearchNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of HealthBethesdaMarylandUSA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Whisenant M, Weathers SP, Li Y, Aldrich E, Ownby K, Thomas J, Ngo-Huang A, Bruera E, Milbury K. Simulation-based caregiving skills training for family members of high-grade glioma patients. Neurooncol Pract 2024; 11:432-440. [PMID: 39006525 PMCID: PMC11241359 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npae025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Because family caregivers of patients with a high-grade glioma experience high levels of distress and feel unprepared to perform the complex caregiving tasks associated with the disease and its treatment, we pilot-tested a caregiving skills intervention that integrates hands-on caregiving with coping skill training. Methods In this single-arm trial, caregivers participated in a 4-session research nurse-led intervention involving simulation-based caregiving skills training at the hospital and psychoeducation delivered via videoconference. We collected measures of patients' and caregivers' psychological symptoms; caregivers' caregiving self-efficacy and role adjustment; and patients' cancer-related symptoms (MDASI) at baseline and again postintervention. We tracked feasibility data. Results We approached 29 dyads of which 10 dyads (34%) consented. All patients (mean age: 60 years, 89% male) and caregivers (mean age: 58 years, 80% female, 80% spouses) completed the baseline and 7 dyads completed the follow-up assessments (attrition was related to patient's hospice transfer). Seven caregivers completed all 4 sessions and rated the program as beneficial. Paired t-tests revealed a significant improvement in caregiving self-efficacy at 6 weeks postintervention (t = -3.06, P = .02). Although improvements in caregiver role adjustment and patient and caregiver symptoms were not observed, no decreases in symptom burden or role adjustment were found during the follow-up period. Conclusions This novel supportive care program appears to be safe, feasible, acceptable, and perceived as useful for caregivers of patients with high-grade glioma. Based on feasibility indicators and a signal of intervention efficacy, a randomized controlled trial is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meagan Whisenant
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Shiao-Pei Weathers
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yisheng Li
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ellen Aldrich
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kristin Ownby
- Cizik School of Nursing, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jessica Thomas
- Cizik School of Nursing, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - An Ngo-Huang
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, & Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Eduardo Bruera
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, & Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kathrin Milbury
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Whisenant M, Snyder S, Weathers SP, Bruera E, Milbury K. Self and proxy symptom reporting in glioma patient-caregiver dyads: the role of psychosocial function in rating accuracy. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2024; 8:74. [PMID: 39017959 PMCID: PMC11255136 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-024-00726-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Illness-related communication and depressive symptoms within families may play an important role in caregivers' ability to accurately understand patients' symptom burden. We examined the associations between these psychosocial factors and symptom accuracy in patients with glioma and their family caregivers. METHODS Patients and caregivers (n = 67 dyads) completed measures of depressive symptoms (CES-D), illness communication (CICS), and QOL (SF-36). Patients reported on their own cancer-related symptoms (MDASI-BT) while caregivers reported on their perception of the patients' symptoms (i.e., proxy reporting). Paired t-tests and difference scores were used to test for agreement (absolute value of difference scores between patients and caregiver proxy symptom and interference severity reports) and accuracy (caregiver underestimation, overestimation, or accurate estimation of patient symptom and interference severity). RESULTS Clinically significant disagreement was found for all means scores of the MDASI-BT subscales except for gastrointestinal symptoms and general symptoms. Among caregivers, 22% overestimated overall symptom severity and 32% overestimated overall symptom interference. In addition, 13% of caregivers underestimated overall symptom severity and 21% of caregivers underestimated overall symptom interference. Patient illness communication was associated with agreement of overall symptom severity (r=-0.27, p = 0.03) and affective symptom subscale (r=-0.34, p < 0.01). Caregivers' reporting of illness communication (r=-0.33, p < 0.01) and depressive symptoms (r = 0.46, p < 0.0001) were associated with agreement of symptom interference. Caregiver underestimating symptom severity was associated with lower patient physical QOL (p < 0.01); caregiver underestimating symptom interference was associated with lower patient physical QOL (p < 0.0001) and overestimating symptom interference was associated with lower patient physical QOL (p < 0.05). Patient and caregiver mental QOL was associated with caregiver underestimating (p < 0.05) and overestimating (p < 0.05) symptom severity. CONCLUSION The psychosocial context of the family plays an important role in the accuracy of symptom understanding. Inaccurately understanding patients experience is related to poor QOL for both patients and caregivers, pointing to important targets for symptom management interventions that involve family caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meagan Whisenant
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Stella Snyder
- Department of Psychology, School of Science, Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Shiao-Pei Weathers
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eduardo Bruera
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kathrin Milbury
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cherng HRR, Qu M, Zafari Z, Bentzen SM, Armstrong TS, Gondi V, Brown PD, Mehta M, Mishra MV. Evaluating the sensitivity of EQ-5D-5L in patients with brain metastases: a secondary analysis of NRG CC001. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024; 116:983-989. [PMID: 38281073 PMCID: PMC11160499 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djae020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 01/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L is a commonly used measure of health-related quality of life in clinical trials given the use of its index score as a measure of health utilities. It is unclear whether EQ-5D-5L is sensitive to changes in neurocognitive function and progression that occur following brain radiation. This study sought to evaluate the sensitivity of EQ-5D-5L in reflecting these changes. METHODS A secondary analysis of NRG Oncology CC001 was performed. Mean EQ-5D-5L index and visual analog scale (VAS) score changes from baseline between groups of patients stratified by neurocognitive function and intracranial progression status were assessed. MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for brain tumor (MDASI-BT) symptom and interference items were also analyzed between groups. RESULTS EQ-5D-5L mean index and VAS score changes between patients who had cognitive failure and those who had preserved cognition showed no statistically significant differences at any timepoint. In contrast, VAS changes at 4 months (1.61 vs -5.13, P = .05) and 6 months (8.17 vs -0.14, P = .04) were significantly improved in the patients who survived without intracranial progression. MDASI-BT cognitive factor scores were improved in the cohort of patients with preserved neurocognitive function at 2 months (1.68 vs 2.08, P = .05) and 4 months (1.35 vs 1.83, P = .04). MDASI-BT symptom interference was significantly associated with intracranial progression at 4 months, but not with neurocognitive status. CONCLUSION EQ-5D-5L index and VAS scores were not sensitive to neurocognitive changes that patients experienced, but VAS scores were sensitive to progression. This study challenges the routine use of EQ-5D as a quality of life metric in brain metastases clinical trials that are focused on preventing neurocognitive dysfunction. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT# 02360215.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hua-Ren R Cherng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Melody Qu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | - Zafar Zafari
- Department of Practice, Sciences, and Health Outcomes Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Søren M Bentzen
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center, and Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Terri S Armstrong
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute Center for Cancer Research, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Vinai Gondi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center and Proton Center, Warrenville, IL, USA
| | - Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Minesh Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Mark V Mishra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Stockdill ML, King A, Johnson M, Karim Z, Cooper D, Armstrong TS. The relationship between social determinants of health and neurocognitive and mood-related symptoms in the primary brain tumor population: A systematic review. Neurooncol Pract 2024; 11:226-239. [PMID: 38737608 PMCID: PMC11085846 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npae016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Social determinants of health (SDOH) impact cancer-related health outcomes, including survival, but their impact on symptoms is less understood among the primary brain tumor (PBT) population. We conducted a systematic review to examine the relationships between SDOH and neurocognitive and mood-related symptoms among the PBT population. PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL were searched using PROGRESS criteria (place of residence, race/ethnicity, occupation, gender/sex, religion, education, socioeconomic status, and social capital) on March 8th, 2022. Two individuals screened and assessed study quality using the NHLBI Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-sectional Studies. Of 3006 abstracts identified, 150 full-text articles were assessed, and 48 were included for a total sample of 28 454 study participants. Twenty-two studies examined 1 SDOH; none examined all 8. Four studies measured place of residence, 2 race/ethnicity, 13 occupation, 42 gender, 1 religion, 18 education, 4 socioeconomic status, and 15 social capital. Fifteen studies assessed neurocognitive and 37 mood-related symptoms. While higher education was associated with less neurocognitive symptoms, and among individuals with meningioma sustained unemployment after surgery was associated with depressive symptoms, results were otherwise disparate among SDOH and symptoms. Most studies were descriptive or exploratory, lacking comprehensive inclusion of SDOH. Standardizing SDOH collection, reducing bias, and recruiting diverse samples are recommended in future interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Macy L Stockdill
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - Amanda King
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - Morgan Johnson
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - Zuena Karim
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - Diane Cooper
- National Institutes of Health Library, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - Terri S Armstrong
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cherng HRR, Sun K, Bentzen S, Armstrong TS, Gondi V, Brown PD, Mehta M, Mishra MV. Evaluating the heterogeneity of hippocampal avoidant whole brain radiotherapy treatment effect: A secondary analysis of NRG CC001. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:911-921. [PMID: 38069666 PMCID: PMC11066939 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hippocampal avoidant whole brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) is the standard of care for patients needing WBRT for brain metastases. This study, using existing data from NRG Oncology CC001 including baseline tumor characteristics and patient-reported MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) scores, sought to identify subgroups of patients that demonstrate differential neuroprotective treatment response to HA-WBRT. METHODS An exploratory analysis of NRG CC001, a phase 3 trial in which 518 patients were randomly assigned to WBRT plus memantine or HA-WBRT plus memantine, was performed. Rates of neurocognitive function failure (NCFF) were estimated between subgroups and stratified by arm. Covariate and subgroup interaction with differential treatment response were calculated. RESULTS The benefit of HA-WBRT on decreasing NCFF was seen in patients living ≥ 4 months (HR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.58-0.97, P = .03), whereas patients living < 4 months derived no significant neurocognitive benefit. A significant association between baseline MDASI-BT cognitive factor and treatment response (interaction P = .03) was identified. Patients with lower MDASI-BT scores (less patient-reported cognitive impairment) derived significantly greater benefit (HR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.48-0.85, P = .002) compared to those with highest MDASI-BT scores (HR = 1.24, 95% CI: 0.76-2.04, P = .39). Tumor histology also had a significant interaction (P = .01) with treatment response. Primary lung histology patients derived cognitive failure risk reduction (HR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.43-0.77, P = .0007) from HA-WBRT, in contrast to nonlung primary histology patients (HR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.78-1.50, P = .48). CONCLUSIONS Differential neuroprotective response to HA-WBRT was identified in this analysis. Patients surviving ≥ 4 months derived benefit from HA-WBRT. There is evidence of heterogeneity of treatment effect for patients with less severe patient-reported cognitive impairment at baseline and those with primary lung histology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hua-Ren R Cherng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kai Sun
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Søren Bentzen
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Terri S Armstrong
- National Cancer Institute Center for Cancer Research, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Vinai Gondi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center and Proton Center, Warrenville, Illinois, USA
| | - Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Minesh Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Mark V Mishra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Piil K, Locatelli G, Skovhus SL, Tolver A, Jarden M. A Shifting Paradigm Toward Family-Centered Care in Neuro-Oncology: A Longitudinal Quasi-Experimental Mixed-Methods Feasibility Study. JOURNAL OF FAMILY NURSING 2024; 30:127-144. [PMID: 38531858 DOI: 10.1177/10748407241236678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
Family-centered intervention can help families facing illness-related issues. We investigated the feasibility of Family and Network Conversations (FNCs) in high-grade glioma patients and their families. Quasi-experimental feasibility study with longitudinal mixed-methods design. Patients and families were invited to three FNCs over 1 year. They completed questionnaires at four time points and expressed their perspectives on the intervention through telephone interviews. Nurses' perspectives were collected in a focus group. Twenty-one patients and 47 family members were included. On average, patients were 66 years old, mainly male, married, living with caregivers, with unifocal cancer. On average, caregivers were 47 years old, mainly female, being spouses or children of the patient. Quantitative and qualitative data did not always match and expanded each other. Nurse-delivered FNCs holistically addressed families' needs while strengthening family's dialogue and union. Nurses felt empowered, underling that advanced competencies were required. Nurse-delivered FNCs are feasible to provide family-centered care, but they should be tailored to each family's needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Piil
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
- Roskilde University, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Mary Jarden
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
- University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dağdelen D, Zincir H. Effects of dependent care theory-based post-surgical home care intervention on self-care, symptoms, and caregiver burden in patients with primary brain tumor and their caregivers: a randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:296. [PMID: 38635060 PMCID: PMC11026272 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08488-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to examine the effect of dependent care theory-based post-surgical home care intervention on self-care, symptoms, and caregiver burden in primary brain tumor patients and their caregivers. METHODS A parallel-group randomized controlled trial was conducted with patients who underwent surgery for a primary brain tumor between March 2019 and January 2020 in a tertiary hospital and with caregivers who cared for them at home. Eligible patients and caregivers were determined by block randomization. Outcome measures included validated measures of self-care agency (Self-Care Agency Scale), symptoms and interference by symptoms (MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor-Turkish Form), and caregiver burden (Caregiver Burden Scale). Two-way analysis of variance was used in repeated measurements from general linear models compared to scale scores. RESULTS Self-care agency was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group in the first and sixth months after surgery (p < 0.05). The severity of the patients' emotional, focal neurologic, and cognitive symptoms and interference by symptoms were significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group (p < 0.05). Caregiver burden was significantly lower in the intervention group in the first, third, and sixth months after surgery (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Dependent care theory-based post-surgical home care intervention increased patients' self-care and reduced symptoms and their effects. It also reduced the caregiver burden. Dependent care theory can guide the nursing practices of nurses who provide institutional and/or home care services to patients with chronic diseases and their caregivers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT05328739 on April 14, 2022 (retrospectively registered).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derya Dağdelen
- Department of Public Health Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Erciyes University, 38280, Kayseri, Turkey.
| | - Handan Zincir
- Department of Public Health Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Erciyes University, 38280, Kayseri, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Law K, Harris E, McCabe MG, Yorke J, van der Veer SN. Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Adolescent and Young Adult Survivors of a Central Nervous System Tumor: A Systematic Review. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2024; 13:40-54. [PMID: 37307017 PMCID: PMC10877386 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2023.0048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To identify and evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for assessing survivorship-related concepts for adolescent and young adult (AYA) survivors of central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Methods: We searched five electronic databases. Two researchers independently screened all titles for inclusion and used consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) guidance to grade the quality of evidence for each measurement property. Results: Four studies met eligibility criteria: single-item pain thermometer; single-item fatigue thermometer; 37-item pediatric functional assessment of cancer therapy-brain tumor survivors, measuring quality of life; and 12-item Perceived Barriers Scale to assess barriers to employment. The Perceived Barrier Scale showed high-quality evidence for internal consistency and moderate quality evidence for construct and structural validity. Evidence for the measurement properties of the other PROMs was low-to-moderate quality. Conclusion: We found one PROM with sufficient evidence for good measurement properties to support its use. This warrants development and evaluation of further PROMs to inform ongoing supportive care for this population. Implications for Cancer Survivors: The Perceived Barriers Scale is sufficiently validated and could be considered to guide support for AYA survivors of CNS tumors to achieve their employment goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Law
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Emily Harris
- The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Martin G. McCabe
- The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Janelle Yorke
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Sabine N. van der Veer
- Centre for Health Informatics, Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Maneekrong S, Tankumpuan T, Danaidutsadeekul S, Siwanuwatn R. Resilience of Patients With Brain Tumor While Awaiting Surgery. J Neurosci Nurs 2024; 56:20-24. [PMID: 38064335 DOI: 10.1097/jnn.0000000000000739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Resilience is the ability of patients to adapt effectively when given a diagnosis of an illness. While awaiting brain tumor surgery, patients often experience uncertainty from brain tumor-related symptoms resulting in inducing depressive symptoms, having physical disability, and reducing quality of life. Resilience studies have been widely conducted in the postoperative phase with a limited knowledge on the preoperative phase. This study aimed to identify predictors of resilience while awaiting brain tumor surgery. METHODS: This cross-sectional predictive study includes 100 participants 18 years and older, with diagnosis of brain tumors, and waiting for brain tumor surgery at the outpatient department of 1 tertiary hospital in Bangkok between August 2022 and February 2023. Multiple linear regression was used to examine the predictors of resilience. RESULTS: Most of the sample (77%) were female with a mean age of 52.71 (13.17) years. The most common type of brain tumor was meningioma (38%). The median waiting time since brain tumor diagnosis until the date of preadmission for operation was 18 (3-1464) days. Symptom severity, social support, and treatment plan were able to explain 37.3% of the variance of resilience in patients awaiting brain tumor surgery ( F = 19.077, P < .01, R2 = 0.373, adjusted R2 = 0.354). CONCLUSION: Resilience is an important skill for patients with brain tumor to manage uncertainty events that occur in their lives. The preoperation phase needs to assess both physical and mental tumor-related symptoms, and include caregivers as part of the care, to promote resilience skill for patients awaiting brain tumor surgery.
Collapse
|
12
|
Harrison RA, Tang M, Shih KK, Khan M, Pham L, De Moraes AR, O'Brien BJ, Bassett R, Bruera E. Characterization of patients with brain metastases referred to palliative care. BMC Palliat Care 2024; 23:13. [PMID: 38212765 PMCID: PMC10782691 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-023-01320-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In this study, we aimed to assess the clinical characteristics, reasons for referral, and outcomes of patients with brain metastases (BM) referred to the supportive care center. METHODS Equal numbers of patients with melanoma, breast cancer, and lung cancer with (N = 90) and without (N = 90) BM were retrospectively identified from the supportive care database for study. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze demographic, disease, and clinical data. Kaplan Meier method was used to evaluate survival outcomes. RESULTS While physical symptom management was the most common reason for referral to supportive care for both patients with and without BM, patients with BM had significantly lower pain scores on ESAS at time of referral (p = 0.002). They had greater interaction with acute care in the last weeks of life, with higher rates of ICU admission, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations after initial supportive care (SC) visit. The median survival time from referral to Supportive Care Center (SCC) was 0.90 years (95% CI 0.73, 1.40) for the brain metastasis group and 1.29 years (95% CI 0.91, 2.29) for the group without BM. CONCLUSIONS Patients with BM have shorter survival and greater interaction with acute care in the last weeks of life. This population also has distinct symptom burdens from patients without BM. Strategies to optimize integration of SC for patients with BM warrant ongoing study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca A Harrison
- Division of Neurology, BC Cancer, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - Michael Tang
- Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kaoswi Karina Shih
- Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maria Khan
- Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lily Pham
- Department of Neurology, University of Maryland School or Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Aline Rozman De Moraes
- Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Barbara J O'Brien
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Roland Bassett
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eduardo Bruera
- Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Whisenant MS, Alexander A, Woodward WA, Teshome M, Ueno NT, Williams LA. Inflammatory Breast Cancer: Understanding the Patient Experience. Cancer Nurs 2024; 47:E65-E72. [PMID: 36729801 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000001165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is an aggressive, locally advanced cancer with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 40%. Although patients with IBC likely experience significant and variable symptom burden from diagnosis through survivorship, the description of the symptom burden in this population is limited. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to describe the experience of patients with IBC and define the content domain for a patient-reported outcome measure of IBC symptom burden. METHODS Twenty patients with IBC described their experience in single qualitative interviews. Content analysis was used to define the symptom burden content domain. Relevance ratings by a panel of experts reduced the number of items for a preliminary patient-reported outcome symptom burden measure. RESULTS The mean (SD) participant age was 52.8 (12.0) years; 50.0% had distant metastatic disease, and 85.0% were currently receiving treatment. Content analysis revealed 45 symptoms, with 20 symptoms reported by greater than or equal to 20% of participants. All participants described localized disease-related symptoms. Treatment-related symptoms varied among participants based on the modalities received. CONCLUSION Patients with IBC experience symptom burden that is distinct from the symptom burden experienced by patients with non-IBC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Differentiating the disease-related symptoms of IBC may assist clinicians in making timely and accurate diagnoses for IBC. A disease- and treatment-specific measure of the symptom burden of IBC should be incorporated in clinical practice to allow for regular assessment and evaluation of symptom burden and implementation of evidence-based interventions for symptom management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meagan S Whisenant
- Author Affiliations: Department of Research, Cizik School of Nursing, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (Dr Whisenant); and Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, Department of Breast Medical Oncology (Drs Alexander and Ueno), Department of Radiation Oncology (Dr Woodward), Department of Breast Surgical Oncology (Dr Teshome), and Department of Symptom Research (Dr Williams), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Briceno N, Vera E, Komlodi-Pasztor E, Abdullaev Z, Choi A, Grajkowska E, Kunst T, Levine J, Lindsley M, Fernandez K, Reyes J, Boris L, Burton E, Panzer M, Polskin L, Penas-Prado M, Pillai T, Theeler BJ, Wu J, Wall K, Papanicolau-Sengos A, Quezado M, Smirniotopoulos J, Aldape K, Armstrong TS, Gilbert MR. Long-term survivors of glioblastoma: Tumor molecular, clinical, and imaging findings. Neurooncol Adv 2024; 6:vdae019. [PMID: 38420614 PMCID: PMC10901543 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdae019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain malignancy with <45% living a year beyond diagnosis. Previously published investigations of long-term survivors (LTS) provided clinical data but rarely incorporated a comprehensive clinical and molecular analysis. Herein, we identify clinical, imaging, molecular, and outcome features for 23 GBM-LTS patients and compare them with a matched cohort of short-term survivors (STS). Methods Molecularly confirmed Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH) wildtype GBM patients living ≥3 years post-diagnosis (NLTS = 23) or <3 years (NSTS = 75) were identified from our Natural History study. Clinical and demographic characteristics were compared. Tumor tissue was analyzed with targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) (NLTS = 23; NSTS = 74) and methylation analysis (NLTS = 18; NSTS = 28). Pre-surgical MRI scans for a subset of LTS (N = 14) and STS control (N = 28) matched on sex, age, and extent of resection were analyzed. Results LTS tended to be younger. Diagnostic MRIs showed more LTS with T1 tumor hypointensity. LTS tumors were enriched for MGMTp methylation and tumor protein 53 (TP53) mutation. Three patients with classic GBM histology were reclassified based on NGS and methylation testing. Additionally, there were LTS with typical poor prognostic molecular markers. Conclusions Our findings emphasize that generalized predictions of prognosis are inaccurate for individual patients and underscore the need for complete clinical evaluation including molecular work-up to confirm the diagnosis. Continued accrual of patients to LTS registries that containcomprehensive clinical, imaging, tumor molecular data, and outcomes measures may pro\vide important insights about individual patient prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Briceno
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Elizabeth Vera
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Edina Komlodi-Pasztor
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Zied Abdullaev
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Anna Choi
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Ewa Grajkowska
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Tricia Kunst
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Jason Levine
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Matthew Lindsley
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Kelly Fernandez
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Jennifer Reyes
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Lisa Boris
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick, Maryland, USA
| | - Eric Burton
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Marissa Panzer
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Lily Polskin
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Marta Penas-Prado
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Tina Pillai
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Brett J Theeler
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Jing Wu
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Kathleen Wall
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Martha Quezado
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - James Smirniotopoulos
- George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
- MedPix, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Kenneth Aldape
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Terri S Armstrong
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Mark R Gilbert
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
McKean WB, Yang J, Boucher K, Shrieve DC, Suneja G, Salzman K, Jensen R, Colman H, Cohen AL. D-TERMINED, a phase 1 trial in newly diagnosed high-grade glioma with temozolomide, radiation, and minocycline followed by adjuvant minocycline/temozolomide. Neurooncol Adv 2024; 6:vdae063. [PMID: 38800698 PMCID: PMC11125402 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdae063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Standard treatment for newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas remains suboptimal. Preclinical data indicate that mesenchymal transition and radiation resistance in glioblastoma are driven by NF-κB and microglia activation, which can be inhibited by minocycline. We assessed the safety and efficacy of minocycline combined with standard radiation and temozolomide in newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas. Methods Adults with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma were eligible. Minocycline was given with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. Minocycline doses were escalated using a 3 + 3 design and expanded to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and adverse event profile. Individual progression-free survival (PFS) was compared to predicted PFS based on RTOG RPA class using a binomial test. The relationships between mesenchymal and microglial biomarkers were analyzed with immunohistochemistry. Results The MTD of minocycline was 150 mg twice per day (N = 20); 1 patient (5%) experienced CTCAE grade 3 + nausea and dizziness, and 2 patients (10%) demonstrated thrombocytopenia requiring temozolomide interruptions. Twelve patients exceeded their predicted PFS (60%), which did not meet the predefined efficacy endpoint of 70%. Symptoms increased during post-radiation treatment but remained mild. No significant correlation was seen between biomarkers and PFS. Expression levels of P-p65, a marker of NF-κB activation, were correlated with the microglia marker IBA-1. Conclusions Minocycline at 150 mg twice per day is well tolerated with standard chemoradiation in patients with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas. PFS was not significantly increased with the addition of minocycline when compared to historical controls. NF-κB activation correlates with microglia levels in high-grade glioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William B McKean
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Jingye Yang
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Kenneth Boucher
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Dennis C Shrieve
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Gita Suneja
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Karen Salzman
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Randy Jensen
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Howard Colman
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Adam L Cohen
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Division of Oncology, Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hong CS, Smith TR. Aerobic exercise interventions to address impaired quality of life in patients with pituitary tumors. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0295907. [PMID: 38100429 PMCID: PMC10723697 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with pituitary tumors may experience persistent fatigue and reduced physical activity, based on subjective measures after treatment. These symptoms may persist despite gross total resection of their tumors and biochemical normalization of pituitary function. While reduced quality of life has been commonly acknowledged in pituitary tumor patients, there is a lack of studies on what interventions may be best implemented to ameliorate these issues, particularly when hormonal levels have otherwise normalized. Aerobic exercise programs have been previously described to ameliorate symptoms of chronic fatigue and reduced physical capacity across a variety of pathologies in the literature. As such, a prescribed aerobic exercise program may be an underrecognized but potentially impactful intervention to address quality of life in pituitary tumor patients. This review seeks to summarize the existing literature on aerobic exercise interventions in patients with pituitary tumors. In addition, future areas of study are discussed, including tailoring exercise programs to the hormonal status of the patient and incorporating more objective measures in monitoring response to interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher S. Hong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center (CNOC), Boston, Masachusettts, United States of America
| | - Timothy R. Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center (CNOC), Boston, Masachusettts, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dummer R, Queirolo P, Gerard Duhard P, Hu Y, Wang D, de Azevedo SJ, Robert C, Ascierto PA, Chiarion-Sileni V, Pronzato P, Spagnolo F, Mujika Eizmendi K, Liszkay G, de la Cruz Merino L, Tawbi H. Atezolizumab, vemurafenib, and cobimetinib in patients with melanoma with CNS metastases (TRICOTEL): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:e461-e471. [PMID: 37459873 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00334-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Targeted therapy and immunotherapy have shown intracranial activity in melanoma with CNS metastases, but there remains an unmet need, particularly for patients with symptomatic CNS metastases. We aimed to evaluate atezolizumab in combination with cobimetinib or vemurafenib plus cobimetinib in patients with melanoma with CNS metastases. METHODS TRICOTEL was a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study done in two cohorts: a BRAFV600 wild-type cohort and a BRAFV600 mutation-positive cohort, recruited at 21 hospitals and oncology centres in Brazil, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Spain, and Switzerland. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with previously untreated metastatic melanoma, brain metastases of 5 mm or larger in at least one dimension, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less. Patients in the BRAFV600 wild-type cohort received intravenous atezolizumab (840 mg, days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle) plus oral cobimetinib (60 mg once daily, days 1-21). Patients in the BRAFV600 mutation-positive cohort received intravenous atezolizumab (840 mg, days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle) plus oral vemurafenib (720 mg twice daily) plus oral cobimetinib (60 mg once daily, days 1-21); atezolizumab was withheld in cycle 1. Treatment was continued until progression, toxicity, or death. The primary outcome was intracranial objective response rate confirmed by assessments at least 4 weeks apart, as assessed by independent review committee (IRC) using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1. Because of early closure of the BRAFV600 wild-type cohort, the primary endpoint of intracranial objective response rate by IRC assessment was not done in this cohort; intracranial objective response rate by investigator assessment was reported instead. Efficacy and safety were analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study medication. This trial is closed to enrolment and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03625141. FINDINGS Between Dec 13, 2018, and Dec 7, 2020, 65 patients were enrolled in the BRAFV600 mutation-positive cohort; the BRAFV600 wild-type cohort was closed early after enrolment of 15 patients. Median follow-up was 9·7 months (IQR 6·3-15·0) for the BRAFV600 mutation-positive cohort and 6·2 months (3·5-23·0) for the BRAFV600 wild-type cohort. Intracranial objective response rate was 42% (95% CI 29-54) by IRC assessment in the BRAFV600 mutation-positive cohort and 27% (95% CI 8-55) by investigator assessment in the BRAFV600 wild-type cohort. Treatment-related grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 41 (68%) of 60 patients who received atezolizumab plus vemurafenib plus cobimetinib in the BRAFV600 mutation-positive cohort, the most common of which were lipase increased (15 [25%] of 60 patients) and blood creatine phosphokinase increased (11 [18%]). Eight (53%) of 15 patients treated with atezolizumab plus cobimetinib in the BRAFV600 wild-type cohort had treatment-related grade 3 or worse adverse events, most commonly anaemia (two [13%]) and dermatitis acneiform (two [13%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 14 (23%) of 60 patients who received triplet therapy in the BRAFV600 mutation-positive cohort and two (13%) of 15 in the BRAFV600 wild-type cohort. No treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION Atezolizumab plus vemurafenib and cobimetinib provided intracranial activity in patients with BRAFV600-mutated melanoma with CNS metastases. FUNDING F Hoffmann-La Roche.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reinhard Dummer
- Department of Dermatology, Skin Cancer Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | | | | | - Youyou Hu
- F Hoffman-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Dao Wang
- F Hoffman-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sergio Jobim de Azevedo
- Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Unidade de Pesquisa Clinica em Oncologia, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Caroline Robert
- Gustave Roussy and Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif-Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Luis de la Cruz Merino
- Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Clinical Oncology Department and Medicine Department, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | - Hussein Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lin NU, Kumthekar P, Sahebjam S, Ibrahim N, Fung A, Cheng A, Nicholas A, Sussell J, Pegram M. Pertuzumab plus high-dose trastuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer with brain metastases: PATRICIA final efficacy data. NPJ Breast Cancer 2023; 9:94. [PMID: 37978197 PMCID: PMC10656527 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-023-00587-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The PATRICIA study (NCT02536339) examined the efficacy and safety of pertuzumab plus high-dose trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with progressive central nervous system (CNS) metastases following radiotherapy. Primary analysis confirmed CNS objective response rate (ORR) was 11% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3-25); clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 68% (4 months) and 51% (6 months). We report final efficacy data after a further 21-months of follow-up, updated safety, survival, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Patients received standard-dose pertuzumab plus high-dose trastuzumab (6 mg/kg weekly) until CNS or systemic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint: confirmed ORR (CNS) per Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases criteria. Secondary endpoints were response duration, CBR, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and PROs. By clinical cut-off, 39 patients had completed or discontinued treatment. Confirmed ORR (CNS) was 11% (95% CI: 3.0-25.4). Median CNS-PFS was 4.6 months (95% CI: 4.0-8.9), as was median CNS-PFS or systemic PFS (95% CI: 4.0-8.9); median OS was 27.2 months (95% CI: 16.1-not reached). CBR in the CNS was 51% (19 patients, 95% CI: 34.4-68.1) at 6 months. Two patients remained on treatment until study closure, achieving stable disease for 4.1 and 4.8 years. Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 7.7% of patients. Patients with confirmed partial response or stable disease (≥4 months) in the CNS had stable PROs over time. Pertuzumab plus high-dose trastuzumab represents a reasonable non-chemotherapeutic treatment option for selected patients with HER2-positive MBC with CNS metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy U Lin
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Priya Kumthekar
- Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Solmaz Sahebjam
- Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Anita Fung
- Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Anna Cheng
- Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Mark Pegram
- Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gondi V, Deshmukh S, Brown PD, Wefel JS, Armstrong TS, Tome WA, Gilbert MR, Konski A, Robinson CG, Bovi JA, Benzinger TLS, Roberge D, Kundapur V, Kaufman I, Shah S, Usuki KY, Baschnagel AM, Mehta MP, Kachnic LA. Sustained Preservation of Cognition and Prevention of Patient-Reported Symptoms With Hippocampal Avoidance During Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: Final Results of NRG Oncology CC001. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:571-580. [PMID: 37150264 PMCID: PMC11070071 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.04.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Initial report of NRG Oncology CC001, a phase 3 trial of whole-brain radiation therapy plus memantine (WBRT + memantine) with or without hippocampal avoidance (HA), demonstrated neuroprotective effects of HA with a median follow-up of fewer than 8 months. Herein, we report the final results with complete cognition, patient-reported outcomes, and longer-term follow-up exceeding 1 year. METHODS AND MATERIALS Adult patients with brain metastases were randomized to HA-WBRT + memantine or WBRT + memantine. The primary endpoint was time to cognitive function failure, defined as decline using the reliable change index on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R), Controlled Oral Word Association, or the Trail Making Tests (TMT) A and B. Patient-reported symptom burden was assessed using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory with Brain Tumor Module and EQ-5D-5L. RESULTS Between July 2015 and March 2018, 518 patients were randomized. The median follow-up for living patients was 12.1 months. The addition of HA to WBRT + memantine prevented cognitive failure (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.74, P = .016) and was associated with less deterioration in TMT-B at 4 months (P = .012) and HVLT-R recognition at 4 (P = .055) and 6 months (P = .011). Longitudinal modeling of imputed data showed better preservation of all HVLT-R domains (P < .005). Patients who received HA-WBRT + Memantine reported less symptom burden at 6 (P < .001 using imputed data) and 12 months (P = .026 using complete-case data; P < .001 using imputed data), less symptom interference at 6 (P = .003 using complete-case data; P = .0016 using imputed data) and 12 months (P = .0027 using complete-case data; P = .0014 using imputed data), and fewer cognitive symptoms over time (P = .043 using imputed data). Treatment arms did not differ significantly in overall survival, intracranial progression-free survival, or toxicity. CONCLUSIONS With median follow-up exceeding 1 year, HA during WBRT + memantine for brain metastases leads to sustained preservation of cognitive function and continued prevention of patient-reported neurologic symptoms, symptom interference, and cognitive symptoms with no difference in survival or toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinai Gondi
- Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center Warrenville and Northwestern Medicine Proton Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Warrenville, Illinois.
| | - Snehal Deshmukh
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Paul D Brown
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiation Oncology, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jeffrey S Wefel
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Neuro-Oncology, Houston, Texas
| | - Terri S Armstrong
- National Cancer Institute Center for Cancer Research, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Wolfgang A Tome
- Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Mark R Gilbert
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Neuro-Oncology, Houston, Texas
| | - Andre Konski
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Joseph A Bovi
- Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | | | | | | | - Isaac Kaufman
- Wayne State University/Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Sunjay Shah
- Delaware/Christiana Care National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program, Wilmington, Delaware
| | | | | | | | - Lisa A Kachnic
- Columbia University, Vagelos Colleg of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hong S, Lee J, Lee J, Chang JH, Park CG, Kim TH. The Mediating Effect of Uncertainty in Illness on Cancer Coping in Patients With Primary Malignant Brain Tumors. Cancer Nurs 2023; 46:467-476. [PMID: 36480344 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000001177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with primary malignant brain tumors (PMBTs) experience uncertainty in illness (UI) because of the high recurrence rate and symptoms that occur during treatment. OBJECTIVE To develop and test a model based on the Uncertainty in Illness Theory to predict the UI and cancer coping experienced by PMBT patients. METHODS This was a cross-sectional study using path analysis. The participants were adults diagnosed with PMBT who completed a questionnaire about demographic and disease-related characteristics, UI, cancer coping, brain tumor symptoms, and social support. Clinical data (eg, the diagnosis, tumor location, and grade) were obtained from electronic health records. Data were analyzed using SPSS 26.0 and the MVN , psych , and lavaan packages in R 4.1.0. RESULTS This study included 203 PMBT patients. The hypothesized model satisfied all statistical criteria (comparative fit index = 0.998, root mean square error of approximation = 0.044, standardized root mean square residual = 0.016). The indirect and direct associations of UI in the path from social support to cancer coping were all significant with a 95% bootstrapping confidence interval. Although the indirect and direct associations of UI in the path of brain tumor symptoms and cancer coping did not have direct or total effects, the indirect effect was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS Uncertainty in illness mediated brain tumor symptoms and social support to predict cancer coping. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE A nurse-led intervention for cancer coping among PMBT patients can be developed by considering symptoms and social support and UI as a mediator.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soomin Hong
- Author Affiliations: College of Nursing and Brain Korea 21 FOUR Project (Dr Hong), Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, College of Nursing (Drs J. H. Lee and J. Lee), and Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine (Dr Chang), Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea; College of Nursing, University of Illinois, Chicago (Dr Park); and Division of Nursing, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Gyeonggi, South Korea (Dr Kim)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Brady K, Cohen AL. Differences in Symptom Burden in Primary Brain Tumor Patients Based on Sex, Race, and Ethnicity: a Single-Center Retrospective Study. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2023:10.1007/s40615-023-01761-9. [PMID: 37783921 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-023-01761-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Symptom burden affects quality of life and prognosis in primary brain tumor (PBT) patients. Knowing whether symptom burden varies based on sex, race, or ethnicity may affect the interpretation of the relationship between symptoms and survival may reveal issues with applying the tools to measure symptom burden to different groups and may identify inequities in symptom management that need to be addressed at a system level. To determine whether symptoms in PBT patients vary across demographic groups, we conducted a retrospective chart review of symptom burden collected as part of routine care in a diverse population. METHODS Patient demographics and scores on the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) module were extracted from the electronic medical record for patients seen in the Inova Neuro-oncology Clinic between March 2021 and June 2022. MDASI-BT scores were compared based on side of tumor, sex, race, and ethnicity for the entire population and for the subset with gliomas. RESULTS We included 125 people, of whom 85 had gliomas. For both the entire group and the subgroup with gliomas, about 40% were female and about 40% were non-White race. No differences in symptom burden were seen between males and females. Pain and numbness/tingling symptom burden were higher in both the entire population and the glioma subgroup for people of Hispanic/Latino/Spanish ethnicity and for people of races other than White or Middle Eastern self-identification. CONCLUSIONS Pain, weakness, and numbness/tingling varied significantly across racial and ethnic groups. Further research is needed to validate this finding in other populations and determine its cause.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kendall Brady
- National Cathedral School, Woodley Road NW, 20016, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Adam L Cohen
- Inova Schar Cancer Institute, 8081 Innovation Park Dr., VA, 22031, Fairfax, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Stockdill ML, Mendoza T, Armstrong TS, Miaskowski C, Cooper B, Vera E. Identification of health-related quality of life profiles among long-term survivors of primary central nervous system tumors. J Neurooncol 2023; 165:181-190. [PMID: 37902916 PMCID: PMC10638191 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04474-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to identify health-related quality of life (HRQOL) latent classes among primary central nervous system tumor (PCNST) long-term survivors (LTS) and to evaluate differences between classes in survivor sociodemographic characteristics, clinical characteristics, and symptoms to guide the development of survivorship care programs tailored to unique class needs. METHODS Data from 298 PCNST LTS reporting HRQOL on the EQ-5D-3L were analyzed using latent profile analysis. Correlations and independent group t-tests were performed to identify differences between identified HRQOL classes by sociodemographic, clinical characteristics, and symptoms. RESULTS Sample mean age was 48 years, 54% were male, 82% Caucasian, 56% employed, 60% had a high-grade glioma, and 52% had a KPS ≥ 90. Two HRQOL classes, good (61%) and poor (39%), were identified. The good HRQOL class reported no problems with self-care and few problems with mobility or usual activities. Thirty-eight percent reported anxiety and depression and 21% pain. Over 94% of the poor HRQOL class had at least moderate problems with mobility and usual activities, and over 50% had pain, self-care issues, anxiety, and depression. Older age (φ = 0.21), unemployment (φ = 0.30), spine tumors (φ = 0.18), active treatment (φ = 0.20), tumor recurrence (φ = 0.28), and poorer KPS scores (φ = 0.61) were associated with membership in the poor HRQOL class. CONCLUSIONS In the poor PCNST LTS HRQOL class, an overwhelming majority faced significant physical challenges, and the good HRQOL class experienced mood-related disturbance but limited physical challenges. These HRQOL profiles can be used to guide survivorship programs and tailored interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Macy L Stockdill
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA.
| | - Tito Mendoza
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - Terri S Armstrong
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | | | - Bruce Cooper
- School of Nursing, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Elizabeth Vera
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Phillips KA, Kamson DO, Schiff D. Disease Assessments in Patients with Glioblastoma. Curr Oncol Rep 2023; 25:1057-1069. [PMID: 37470973 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01440-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The neuro-oncology team faces a unique challenge when assessing treatment response in patients diagnosed with glioblastoma. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the standard imaging modality for measuring therapeutic response in both clinical practice and clinical trials. However, even for the neuroradiologist, MRI interpretations are not straightforward because of tumor heterogeneity, as evidenced by varying degrees of enhancement, infiltrating tumor patterns, cellular densities, and vasogenic edema. The situation is even more perplexing following therapy since treatment-related changes can mimic viable tumor. Additionally, antiangiogenic therapies can dramatically decrease contrast enhancement giving the false impression of decreasing tumor burden. Over the past few decades, several approaches have emerged to augment and improve visual interpretation of glioblastoma response to therapeutics. Herein, we summarize the state of the art for evaluating the response of glioblastoma to standard therapies and investigational agents as well as challenges and future directions for assessing treatment response in neuro-oncology. RECENT FINDINGS Monitoring glioblastoma responses to standard therapy and novel agents has been fraught with many challenges and limitations over the past decade. Excitingly, new promising methods are emerging to help address these challenges. Recently, the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group proposed an updated response criteria (RANO 2.0) for the evaluation of all grades of glial tumors regardless of IDH status or therapies being evaluated. In addition, advanced neuroimaging techniques, such as histogram analysis, parametric response maps, morphometric segmentation, radio pharmacodynamics approaches, and the integrating of amino acid radiotracers in the tumor evaluation algorithm may help resolve equivocal lesion interpretations without operative intervention. Moreover, the introduction of other techniques, such as liquid biopsy and artificial intelligence could complement conventional visual assessment of glioblastoma response to therapies. Neuro-oncology has evolved over the past decade and has achieved significant milestones, including the establishment of new standards of care, emerging therapeutic options, and novel clinical, translational, and basic research. More recently, the integration of histopathology with molecular features for tumor classification has marked an important paradigm shift in brain tumor diagnosis. In a similar manner, treatment response monitoring in neuro-oncology has made considerable progress. While most techniques are still in their inception, there is an emerging body of evidence for clinical application. Further research will be critically important for the development of impactful breakthroughs in this area of the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kester A Phillips
- The Ben and Catherine Ivy Center for Advanced Brain Tumor Treatment at Swedish Neuroscience Institute, 550 17Th Ave Suite 540, Seattle, WA, 98122, USA
| | - David O Kamson
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, 201 North Broadway, Skip Viragh Outpatient Cancer Building, 9Th Floor, Room 9177, Mailbox #3, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA
| | - David Schiff
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of Virginia Health System, 1300 Jefferson Park Avenue, West Complex, Room 6225, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Frequency and burden of potentially treatable symptoms in glioma patients with stable disease. Heliyon 2023; 9:e13278. [PMID: 36798771 PMCID: PMC9925977 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background & aims Glioma patients experience a multitude of symptoms that negatively affect their health-related quality of life. Symptoms vary greatly across disease phases, and the patients' stable phase might be particularly suitable for assessing and treating symptoms. Identifying symptoms and patients' needs is a first step toward improving patient care. In glioma patients with stable disease, we assessed the frequency and burden of patient-reported symptoms, examined how these symptoms co-occur, and also determined whether patients would consider treatment to ameliorate specific symptoms. Methods In this retrospective study, patients rated the frequency and burden of seventeen symptoms on a seven-point Likert scale and stated whether they would consider treatment for these symptoms. Correlations between frequency, burden, and considering treatment were evaluated with Kendall's Tau correlation coefficients. Based on partial correlations between symptom frequencies we visualized the symptoms as a network. Results Fifty-two glioma patients with stable disease were included (31 WHO grade II/III, 21 WHO grade IV). The top five symptoms were fatigue, memory problems, reduced physical fitness, concentration problems, and drowsiness. Fatigue had the highest median frequency (4.5, interquartile range 2.5). Over half of the patients experienced three or more symptoms simultaneously and associations between all symptoms were depicted as a network. Overall, 35% of patients would consider treatment for at least one symptom. The wish to undergo symptom treatment correlated only moderately with symptom frequency and burden (range of correlations 0.24-0.57 and 0.28-0.61, respectively). Conclusion Glioma patients with stable disease experience multiple symptoms with a consequently high symptom burden. Despite the high prevalence of symptoms, the inclination for symptom management interventions was relatively low. The most frequent and burdensome symptoms and the way they are interrelated could serve as a roadmap for future research on symptom management in these patients.
Collapse
|
25
|
Frederico SC, Vera E, Abdullaev Z, Acquaye A, Aldape K, Boris L, Briceno N, Choi A, Christ A, Cooper D, Grajkowska E, Kunst T, Leeper HE, Levine J, Lollo N, Pratt D, Quezado M, Shah R, Wall K, Gilbert MR, Armstrong TS, Penas-Prado M. Heterogeneous clinicopathological findings and patient-reported outcomes in adults with MN1-altered CNS tumors: A case report and systematic literature review. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1099618. [PMID: 36741001 PMCID: PMC9892899 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1099618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
The uncommon MN1-altered primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors were recently added to the World Health Organization 2021 classification under the name Astroblastoma, MN1-altered. Another term used to describe them, "High-grade neuroepithelial tumor with MN1 alteration" (HGNET-MN1), makes reference to their distinct epigenetic profile but is currently not a recommended name. Thought to occur most commonly in children and predominantly in females, MN1-altered CNS tumors are associated with typical but not pathognomonic histological patterns and are characterized by a distinct DNA methylation profile and recurrent fusions implicating the MN1 (meningioma 1) gene. Diagnosis based on histological features alone is challenging: most cases with morphological features of astroblastoma (but not all) show these molecular features, whereas not all tumors with MN1 fusions show astroblastoma morphology. There is large variability in reported outcomes and detailed clinical and therapeutic information is frequently missing. Some patients experience multiple recurrences despite multimodality treatment, whereas others experience no recurrence after surgical resection alone, suggesting large clinical and biological heterogeneity despite unifying epigenetic features and recurrent fusions. In this report, we present the demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment, and outcome (including patient-reported outcomes) of three adults with MN1-altered primary CNS tumors diagnosed via genome-wide DNA methylation and RNA sequencing. All three patients were females and two of them were diagnosed as young adults. By reporting our neuropathological and clinical findings and comparing them with previously published cases we provide insight into the clinical heterogeneity of this tumor. Additionally, we propose a model for prospective, comprehensive, and systematic collection of clinical data in addition to neuropathological data, including standardized patient-reported outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen C. Frederico
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States,University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Elizabeth Vera
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Zied Abdullaev
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Alvina Acquaye
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Kenneth Aldape
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Lisa Boris
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Nicole Briceno
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Anna Choi
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Alexa Christ
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Diane Cooper
- Office of Research Services, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Ewa Grajkowska
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Tricia Kunst
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Heather E. Leeper
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Jason Levine
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States,IT and Clinical Informatics, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Nicole Lollo
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Drew Pratt
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Martha Quezado
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Ritu Shah
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Kathleen Wall
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Mark R. Gilbert
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Terri S. Armstrong
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Marta Penas-Prado
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States,*Correspondence: Marta Penas-Prado,
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Fleege NMG, Pierce-Gjeldum D, Swartz LK, Verbal K, Merajver S, Friese CR, Kiyota A, Heth J, Leung D, Smith SR, Gabel N, Kim MM, Morikawa A. IMPACT the Brain: A Team-Based Approach to Management of Metastatic Breast Cancer With CNS Metastases. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:e67-e77. [PMID: 36223556 PMCID: PMC9870235 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE CNS metastases are associated with decreased survival and quality of life for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Team-based care can optimize outcomes. IMPACT the Brain is a care coordination program that aims to improve access to team-based care for patients with MBC and CNS metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with MBC and CNS metastases were eligible for enrollment in this care coordination program. A team of specialists supported a dedicated program coordinator who provided navigation, education, specialty referral, and clinical trial screening. A unique intake form developed for the program created personalized, coordinated, and expedited specialty referrals. Patient-reported outcomes and caregiver burden assessments were collected on a voluntary basis throughout enrollment. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Sixty patients were referred, and 53 were enrolled (88%). The median time to program enrollment was 1 day (range, 0-11) and to first visit was 5 days (range, 0-25). On the basis of the program intake form, 47 referrals were made across six specialties, most commonly physical medicine and rehabilitation (n = 10), radiation oncology (n = 10), and neuropsychology (n = 10). Nineteen patients (36%) consented to enroll in clinical trials. CONCLUSION A tailored team-based care coordination program for patients with MBC and CNS metastases is feasible. Use of a unique intake screening form by a dedicated program coordinator resulted in faster time to first patient visit, enabled access to subspecialist care, and supported enrollment in clinical trials. Future research should focus on intervention development using PRO data collected in this care coordination program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole M. Grogan Fleege
- University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI,Nicole M. Grogan Fleege, MD, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Twitter: @NicoleFleege; e-mail:
| | | | | | - Kait Verbal
- University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | | | - Ayano Kiyota
- University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jason Heth
- University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Denise Leung
- University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | | | | | - Aki Morikawa
- University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wang Y, Zhang J, Luo C, Yao Y, Qin G, Wu J. Predictive models and survival analysis of postoperative mental health disturbances in adult glioma patients. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1153455. [PMID: 37152011 PMCID: PMC10160603 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1153455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives Patients with primary malignant brain tumors may experience mental health disturbances that can significantly affect their daily life. This study aims to identify risk factors and generate predictive models for postoperative mental health disturbances (PMHDs) in adult glioma patients in accordance with different clinical periods; additionally, survival analyses will be performed. Methods This longitudinal cohort study included 2,243 adult patients (age at diagnosis ≥ 18 years) with nonrecurrent glioma who were pathologically diagnosed and had undergone initial surgical resection. Six indicators of distress, sadness, fear, irritability, mood and enjoyment of life, ranging from 0-10, were selected to assess PMHDs in glioma patients in the third month after surgery, mainly referring to the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor Module (MDASI-BT). Factor analysis (FA) was applied on these indicators to divide participants into PMHD and control groups based on composite factor scores. Survival analyses were performed, and separate logistic regression models were formulated for preoperative and postoperative factors predicting PMHDs. Results A total of 2,243 adult glioma patients were included in this study. Based on factor analysis results, 300 glioma patients had PMHDs in the third postoperative month, and the remaining 1,943 were controls. Candidate predictors for PMHDs in the preoperative model were associated with age, clinical symptoms (intracranial space-occupying lesion, muscle weakness and memory deterioration), and tumor location (corpus callosum, basal ganglia and brainstem), whereas age, clinical symptoms (nausea and memory deterioration), tumor location (basal ganglia and brainstem), hospitalization days, WHO grade 4, postoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy and postoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) served as important factors in the postoperative model. In addition, the median overall survival (OS) time for glioma patients with PMHDs was 19 months, compared to 13 months for glioblastoma, IDH-wild type (GBM) patients with PMHDs. Conclusion The risk factors for PMHDs were identified. These findings may provide new insights into predicting the probability of PMHD occurrence in glioma patients in addition to aiding effective early intervention and improving prognosis based on different clinical stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jie Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Neurosurgical Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Clinical Medical Center of Neurosurgery, Shanghai Municipal Health Commission, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Restoration and Neural Regeneration, Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality, Shanghai, China
| | - Chen Luo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Neurosurgical Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Clinical Medical Center of Neurosurgery, Shanghai Municipal Health Commission, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Restoration and Neural Regeneration, Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality, Shanghai, China
| | - Ye Yao
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- National Clinical Research Centre for Aging and Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety of Ministry of Education, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Ye Yao, ; Jinsong Wu,
| | - Guoyou Qin
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety of Ministry of Education, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jinsong Wu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Neurosurgical Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Clinical Medical Center of Neurosurgery, Shanghai Municipal Health Commission, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Restoration and Neural Regeneration, Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Ye Yao, ; Jinsong Wu,
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Vera E, Christ A, Grajkowska E, Briceno N, Choi A, Crandon SK, Wall K, Lindsley M, Leeper HE, Levine J, Reyes J, Acquaye AA, King AL, Jammula V, Roche K, Rogers JL, Timmer M, Boris L, Lollo N, Panzer M, Polskin L, Pillai T, Burton E, Penas-Prado M, Theeler B, Gilbert MR, Armstrong TS, Mendoza TR. Relationship between RANO-PRO Working Group standardised priority constructs and disease progression among malignant glioma patients: A retrospective cohort study. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 55:101718. [PMID: 36386035 PMCID: PMC9661442 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recognising the importance of clinical outcomes assessments (COAs), the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology-Patient Reported Outcome (RANO-PRO) Working Group recommended inclusion of core symptoms and functions in clinical care or research for malignant glioma patients. This study evaluated the association of the recommended symptoms (pain, perceived cognition, seizures, aphasia, symptomatic adverse events) and functions (weakness, walking, work, usual activities) with disease progression in these patients. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, patients with malignant glioma were included from the US National Cancer Institute Neuro-Oncology Branch Natural History Study (NOB-NHS) which follows primary central nervous system tumour patients aged 18 years and older throughout their disease trajectory. The M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT), EQ-5D-3L, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), and Neurologic Function scores (NFS) were evaluated in relation to disease progression by chi-square tests, independent- and paired-samples t-tests, adjusted for multiple comparisons at first assessment and over time to a second assessment. Radiographic disease progression was determined on the interpretation of the imaging study by a radiologist and neuro-oncologist using standard criteria as part of clinical trial participation or routine standard of care. The priority constructs were evaluated to provide initial evidence of their relevance, relationship to disease status over time, and sensitivity to change in a diverse group of patients with malignant glioma. FINDINGS Seven hundred and sixty-five patients had enrolled into the NOB-NHS between September 1, 2016 and January 31, 2020. Three hundred and thirty-six patients had a diagnosis of a malignant glioma (anaplastic astrocytoma, anaplastic oligodendroglioma, glioblastoma, and gliosarcoma) and were included in the current study. The sample was 64% male (n = 215), 36% female (n = 121), median age of 52 years (IQR = 18.75), 82% White (n = 276), and 65% had tumour recurrence (n = 219). One hundred and fifty-four (46%) had radiographic disease progression. Difficulty remembering, fatigue, and weakness were worse in the group whose imaging was interpreted as radiographic disease progression versus stable disease, as well as the functions of walking, work, activity, and self-care (1.1 < difference < 1.8). Patients with disease progression were four times more likely to have a poor KPS (≤80) and worse NFS. Among patients with disease progression at a second assessment (n = 112), all symptoms, except seizures, worsened between first assessment and disease progression and up to 22% of patients (n = 25) reported worsening mobility, self-care, and usual activity; 46% (n = 51) and 35% (n = 30) had worsened KPS and NFS, respectively. On average, 4 symptoms or functions (SD = 3) were reported as moderate-to-severe and 30% (n = 33) and 23% (n = 26) had a change to moderate-to-severe fatigue and walking, respectively, at time of disease progression. Over 7% of patients with worsening (n = 7 of 100) reported every symptom and function as having changed the most severely including seizures with fatigue and activity reported as the top symptom and function, respectively. INTERPRETATION The identified core symptoms and functions worsened at the time of progression, supporting the relevance and sensitivity of the priority constructs identified by the RANO-PRO Working Group for clinical care and clinical trials for malignant glioma patients. FUNDING The Natural History Study is supported by Intramural Project 1ZIABC011786-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Vera
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, US National Cancer Institute, 9030 Old Georgetown Road, Bldg 82, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States of America
- Corresponding author.
| | - Alexa Christ
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, US National Cancer Institute, 9030 Old Georgetown Road, Bldg 82, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States of America
| | - Ewa Grajkowska
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, US National Cancer Institute, 9030 Old Georgetown Road, Bldg 82, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States of America
| | - Nicole Briceno
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, US National Cancer Institute, 9030 Old Georgetown Road, Bldg 82, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States of America
| | - Anna Choi
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, US National Cancer Institute, 9030 Old Georgetown Road, Bldg 82, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States of America
| | - Sonja K. Crandon
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, US National Cancer Institute, 9030 Old Georgetown Road, Bldg 82, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States of America
| | - Kathleen Wall
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, US National Cancer Institute, 9030 Old Georgetown Road, Bldg 82, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States of America
| | - Matthew Lindsley
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, US National Cancer Institute, 9030 Old Georgetown Road, Bldg 82, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States of America
| | - Heather E. Leeper
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, US National Cancer Institute, 9030 Old Georgetown Road, Bldg 82, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States of America
| | - Jason Levine
- Center for Cancer Research, US National Cancer Institute, Room 2W322, Rockville, MD 20850, United States of America
| | - Jennifer Reyes
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, US National Cancer Institute, 9030 Old Georgetown Road, Bldg 82, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States of America
| | - Alvina A. Acquaye
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, US National Cancer Institute, 9030 Old Georgetown Road, Bldg 82, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States of America
| | - Amanda L. King
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, US National Cancer Institute, 9030 Old Georgetown Road, Bldg 82, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States of America
| | - Varna Jammula
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, US National Cancer Institute, 9030 Old Georgetown Road, Bldg 82, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States of America
| | - Kayla Roche
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, US National Cancer Institute, 9030 Old Georgetown Road, Bldg 82, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States of America
| | - James L. Rogers
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, US National Cancer Institute, 9030 Old Georgetown Road, Bldg 82, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States of America
| | - Michael Timmer
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, US National Cancer Institute, 9030 Old Georgetown Road, Bldg 82, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States of America
| | - Lisa Boris
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, US National Cancer Institute, 9030 Old Georgetown Road, Bldg 82, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States of America
| | - Nicole Lollo
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, US National Cancer Institute, 9030 Old Georgetown Road, Bldg 82, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States of America
| | - Marissa Panzer
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, US National Cancer Institute, 9030 Old Georgetown Road, Bldg 82, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States of America
| | - Lily Polskin
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, US National Cancer Institute, 9030 Old Georgetown Road, Bldg 82, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States of America
| | - Tina Pillai
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, US National Cancer Institute, 9030 Old Georgetown Road, Bldg 82, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States of America
| | - Eric Burton
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, US National Cancer Institute, 9030 Old Georgetown Road, Bldg 82, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States of America
| | - Marta Penas-Prado
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, US National Cancer Institute, 9030 Old Georgetown Road, Bldg 82, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States of America
| | - Brett Theeler
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Rd, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States of America
| | - Mark R. Gilbert
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, US National Cancer Institute, 9030 Old Georgetown Road, Bldg 82, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States of America
| | - Terri S. Armstrong
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, US National Cancer Institute, 9030 Old Georgetown Road, Bldg 82, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States of America
| | - Tito R. Mendoza
- Office of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, US National Cancer Institute, 9030 Old Georgetown Road, Bldg 82, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Retzer A, Baddeley E, Sivell S, Scott H, Nelson A, Bulbeck H, Seddon K, Grant R, Adams R, Watts C, Aiyegbusi OL, Kearns P, Rivera SC, Dirven L, Calvert M, Byrne A. Development of a core outcome set for use in adult primary glioma phase III interventional trials: A mixed methods study. Neurooncol Adv 2023; 5:vdad096. [PMID: 37719788 PMCID: PMC10503650 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdad096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Glioma interventional studies should collect data aligned with patient priorities, enabling treatment benefit assessment and informed decision-making. This requires effective data synthesis and meta-analyses, underpinned by consistent trial outcome measurement, analysis, and reporting. Development of a core outcome set (COS) may contribute to a solution. Methods A 5-stage process was used to develop a COS for glioma trials from the UK perspective. Outcome lists were generated in stages 1: a trial registry review and systematic review of qualitative studies and 2: interviews with glioma patients and caregivers. In stage 3, the outcome lists were de-duplicated with accessible terminology, in stage 4 outcomes were rated via a 2-round Delphi process, and stage 5 comprised a consensus meeting to finalize the COS. Patient-reportable COS outcomes were identified. Results In Delphi round 1, 96 participants rated 35 outcomes identified in stages 1 and 2, to which a further 10 were added. Participants (77/96) rated the resulting 45 outcomes in round 2. Of these, 22 outcomes met a priori threshold for inclusion in the COS. After further review, a COS consisting of 19 outcomes grouped into 7 outcome domains (survival, adverse events, activities of daily living, health-related quality of life, seizure activity, cognitive function, and physical function) was finalized by 13 participants at the consensus meeting. Conclusions A COS for glioma trials was developed, comprising 7 outcome domains. Additional research will identify appropriate measurement tools and further validate this COS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ameeta Retzer
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research (CPROR), Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands (ARC WM), Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Elin Baddeley
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
| | - Stephanie Sivell
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
| | - Hannah Scott
- Division of Research and Evaluation, Office for Standards in Education, Childrens' Services and Skills (OFSTED), Bristol, UK
| | - Annmarie Nelson
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
| | | | | | - Robin Grant
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Richard Adams
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Colin Watts
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK
| | - Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research (CPROR), Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands (ARC WM), Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Birmingham-Oxford Blood and Transplant Research Unit (BTRU) in Precision Transplant and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Pamela Kearns
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham , UK
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham , UK
| | - Samantha Cruz Rivera
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research (CPROR), Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Linda Dirven
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Melanie Calvert
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research (CPROR), Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands (ARC WM), Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Midlands Health Data Research UK, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Birmingham-Oxford Blood and Transplant Research Unit (BTRU) in Precision Transplant and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Anthony Byrne
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
King AL, Shuboni-Mulligan DD, Vera E, Crandon S, Acquaye AA, Boris L, Burton E, Choi A, Christ A, Grajkowska E, Jammula V, Leeper HE, Lollo N, Penas-Prado M, Reyes J, Theeler B, Wall K, Wu J, Gilbert MR, Armstrong TS. Exploring the prevalence and burden of sleep disturbance in primary brain tumor patients. Neurooncol Pract 2022; 9:526-535. [PMID: 36388423 PMCID: PMC9665069 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npac049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sleep disturbance (SD) is common in patients with cancer and has been associated with worse clinical outcomes. This cross-sectional study explored the prevalence of SD in a primary brain tumor (PBT) population, identified associated demographic and clinical characteristics, and investigated co-occurrence of SD with other symptoms and mood disturbance. METHODS Demographic, clinical characteristics, MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor, and Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Depression and Anxiety Short-Forms were collected from PBT patients at study entry. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests, and independent t-tests were used to report results. RESULTS The sample included 424 patients (58% male, 81% Caucasian) with a mean age of 49 years (range 18-81) and 58% with high-grade gliomas. Moderate-severe SD was reported in 19% of patients and was associated with younger age, poor Karnofsky Performance Status, tumor progression on MRI, and active corticosteroid use. Those with moderate-severe SD had higher overall symptom burden and reported more moderate-severe symptoms. These individuals also reported higher severity in affective and mood disturbance domains, with 3 to 4 times higher prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms, respectively. The most frequently co-occurring symptoms with SD were, drowsiness, and distress, though other symptoms typically associated with tumor progression also frequently co-occurred. CONCLUSIONS PBT patients with moderate-severe SD are more symptomatic, have worse mood disturbance, and have several co-occurring symptoms. Targeting interventions for sleep could potentially alleviate other co-occurring symptoms, which may improve life quality for PBT patients. Future longitudinal work examining objective and detailed subjective sleep reports, as well as underlying genetic risk factors, will be important.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda L King
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Dorela D Shuboni-Mulligan
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Elizabeth Vera
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Sonja Crandon
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Alvina A Acquaye
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Lisa Boris
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick, Maryland, USA
| | - Eric Burton
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Anna Choi
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Alexa Christ
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Ewa Grajkowska
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Varna Jammula
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Heather E Leeper
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Nicole Lollo
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Marta Penas-Prado
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Jennifer Reyes
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Brett Theeler
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Kathleen Wall
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick, Maryland, USA
| | - Jing Wu
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Mark R Gilbert
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Terri S Armstrong
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Figuracion KCF, Halasz LM, Lam NY, Goldberg M, Stuckey J, Failor RA, Knowles LM, Artherholt S, Chou B, Francis CE, Knight K, Kaur M, Sadak T, McGranahan T. Surveillance of long-term complications after treatment of adult brain tumor survivors-review and evidence-based recommendations. Neurooncol Pract 2022; 9:475-486. [PMID: 36388419 PMCID: PMC9665061 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npac053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/08/2024] Open
Abstract
As a result of treatment and diagnosis, adults with primary or metastatic brain tumors experience comorbidities that impacts their health and well-being. The Children's Oncology Group has guideline recommendations for childhood survivors of brain tumors; however, guidelines for monitoring long-term sequela among adult brain tumor survivors are lacking. The purpose of this review is to present the screening recommendations for the long-term complications after brain tumor treatment from a multidisciplinary panel of healthcare professionals. Chronic complications identified include cognitive dysfunction, vasculopathy, endocrinopathy, ophthalmic, ototoxicity, physical disability, sleep disturbance, mood disorder, unemployment, financial toxicity, and secondary malignancy. We invited specialists across disciplines to perform a literature search and provide expert recommendations for surveillance for long-term complications for adult brain tumor survivors. The Brain Tumor Center Survivorship Committee recommends routine screening using laboratory testing, subjective assessment of symptoms, and objective evaluations to appropriately monitor the complications of brain tumor treatments. Effective monitoring and treatment should involve collaboration with primary care providers and may require referral to other specialties and support services to provide patient-centered care during neuro-oncology survivorship. Further research is necessary to document the incidence and prevalence of medical complications as well as evaluate the efficacy of screening and neuro-oncology survivorship programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karl Cristie F Figuracion
- ITHS TL1 Training Program University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA
- Alvord Brain Tumor Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA
| | - Lia M Halasz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA
| | - Ny-Ying Lam
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA
| | - Myron Goldberg
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA
| | - Joe Stuckey
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, 98105 University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA
| | - Richard A Failor
- Department of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Nutrition, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98105, USA
| | - Lindsey M Knowles
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA
| | - Samantha Artherholt
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA
| | - Brian Chou
- Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA
| | - Courtney E Francis
- Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA
| | - Kristin Knight
- Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA
| | - Maninder Kaur
- Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California, USA
| | - Tatiana Sadak
- Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA
| | - Tresa McGranahan
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Saraf A, Trippa L, Rahman R. Novel Clinical Trial Designs in Neuro-Oncology. Neurotherapeutics 2022; 19:1844-1854. [PMID: 35969361 PMCID: PMC9723049 DOI: 10.1007/s13311-022-01284-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Scientific and technologic advances have led to a boon of candidate therapeutics for patients with malignancies of the central nervous system. The path from drug development to clinical use has generally followed a regimented order of sequential clinical trial phases. The recent increase in novel therapies, however, has strained the regulatory process and unearthed limitations of the current system, including significant cost, prolonged development time, and difficulties in testing therapies for rarer tumors. Novel clinical trial designs have emerged to increase efficiencies in clinical trial conduct to better evaluate and bring impactful drugs to patients in a timely manner. In order to better capture meaningful benefits for brain tumor patients, new endpoints to complement or replace traditional endpoints are also an increasingly important consideration. This review will explore the current challenges in the current clinical trial landscape and discuss novel clinical trial concepts, including consideration of limitations and risks of novel trial designs, within the context of neuro-oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anurag Saraf
- Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lorenzo Trippa
- Department of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rifaquat Rahman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Day J, Yust-Katz S, Cachia D, Wefel J, Tremont Lukats IW, Bulbeck H, Rooney AG. Interventions for the management of fatigue in adults with a primary brain tumour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 9:CD011376. [PMID: 36094728 PMCID: PMC9466986 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011376.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fatigue is a common and disabling symptom in people with a primary brain tumour (PBT). The effectiveness of interventions for treating clinically significant levels of fatigue in this population is unclear. This is an updated version of the original Cochrane Review published in Issue 4, 2016. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for adults with PBT and clinically significant (or high levels) of fatigue. SEARCH METHODS For this updated review, we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase, and checked the reference lists of included studies in April 2022. We also searched relevant conference proceedings, and ClinicalTrials.gov for ongoing trials. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention in adults with PBT and fatigue, where fatigue was the primary outcome measure. We restricted inclusion specifically to studies that enrolled only participants with clinically significant levels of fatigue to improve the clinical utility of the findings. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors (JD, DC) independently evaluated search results for the updated search. Two review authors (JD, SYK) extracted data from selected studies, and carried out a risk of bias assessment. We extracted data on fatigue, mood, cognition, quality of life and adverse events outcomes. MAIN RESULTS The original review identified one study and this update identified a further two for inclusion. One study investigated the use of modafinil, one study the use of armodafinil and one study the use of dexamfetamine. We identified three ongoing studies. In the original review, the single eligible trial compared modafinil to placebo for 37 participants with a high- or low-grade PBT. One new study compared two doses of armodafinil (150 mg and 250 mg) to placebo for 297 people with a high-grade glioma. The second new study compared dexamfetamine sulfate to placebo for 46 participants with a low- or high-grade PBT. The evidence was uncertain for both modafinil and dexamfetamine regarding fatigue outcome measures, compared to controls, at study endpoint. Two trials did not reach the planned recruitment target and therefore may not, in practice, have been adequately powered to detect a difference. These trials were at a low risk of bias across most areas. There was an unclear risk of bias related to the use of mean imputation for one study because the investigators did not analyse the impact of imputation on the results and information regarding baseline characteristics and randomisation were not clear. The certainty of the evidence measured using GRADE was very low across all three studies. There was one identified study awaiting classification once data are available, which investigated the feasibility of 'health coaching' for people with a PBT experiencing fatigue. There were three ongoing studies that may be eligible for an update of this review, all investigating a non-pharmacological intervention for fatigue in people with PBT. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is currently insufficient evidence to draw reliable and generalisable conclusions regarding potential effectiveness or harm of any pharmacological or non-pharmacological treatments for fatigue in people with PBT. More research is needed on how best to treat people with brain tumours with high fatigue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Day
- Edinburgh Centre for Neuro-Oncology (ECNO), Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Shlomit Yust-Katz
- Sheba Medical Center, and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - David Cachia
- University of Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jeffrey Wefel
- University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ivo W Tremont Lukats
- Kenneth R. Peak Center for Brain and Pituitary Tumors, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Surgical frailty is a condition in which patients are weak with varied recovery of various organ functions after surgery resulting in unpleasant outcomes. Frailty studies have been conducted in several populations with a limited knowledge on postoperative brain tumor patients. This study aimed to examine factors predicting frailty in brain tumor patients after craniotomy. METHODS: This study was a cross-sectional predictive study. The sample included 85 patients who were 18 years or older and underwent craniotomy with tumor removal from 1 university hospital in Bangkok, Thailand, between February and October 2021. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistic, Pearson correlation, and multiple linear regression, which determined significance level at .05. RESULTS: The prevalence of frailty among participants was 50.6%. Postoperative symptom and mood state were positively associated with frailty (r = 0.410 and r = 0.448, respectively; P < .01). Postoperative symptom, mood state, age, tumor type, and income could explain the variance of frailty in brain tumor patients after craniotomy by 40.3% (R2 = 0.403, P < .01). CONCLUSION: Healthcare providers should plan for discharge planning including assessment and develop the intervention for managing postoperative symptoms and psychological symptoms to promote recovery from frailty that generally occurs after brain tumor surgery.
Collapse
|
35
|
Sass D, Vera E, Choi A, Acquaye A, Briceno N, Christ A, Grajkowska E, Jammula V, Levine J, Lindsley M, Reyes J, Roche K, Rogers JL, Timmer M, Boris L, Burton E, Lollo N, Panzer M, Penas-Prado M, Pillai V, Polskin L, Theeler BJ, Wu J, Gilbert MR, Armstrong TS, Leeper H. Evaluation of the key geriatric assessment constructs in primary brain tumor population - a descriptive study. J Geriatr Oncol 2022; 13:1194-1202. [PMID: 36041994 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite an increasing aging population, older adults (≥ 65 years) with primary brain tumors (PBTs) are not routinely assessed for geriatric vulnerabilities. Recent reports of geriatric assessment (GA) in patients with glioblastomas demonstrated that GA may serve as a sensitive prognosticator of overall survival. Yet, current practice does not include routine evaluation of geriatric vulnerabilities and the relevance of GA has not been previously evaluated in broader cohorts of PBT patients. The objective of this descriptive study was to assess key GA constructs in adults with PBT dichotomized into older versus younger groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS A cross-sectional analysis of data collected from 579 participants with PBT recruited between 2016 and 2020, dichotomized into older (≥ 65 years, n = 92) and younger (≤ 64 years, n = 487) from an ongoing observational trial. GA constructs were evaluated using socio-demographic characteristics, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), polypharmacy (>5 daily medications), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), Neurologic Function Score (NFS), and patient-reported outcome assessments including general health, functional status, symptom burden and interference, and mood. Descriptive statistics, t-tests, chi-square tests, and Pearson correlations were used to evaluate differences between age groups. RESULTS Older participants were more likely to have problems with mobility (58% vs. 44%), usual activities (64% vs 50%) and self-care (38% vs 26%) compared to the younger participants (odds ratios [ORs] = 1.3-1.4, ps < 0.05), while older participants were less likely to report feeling distressed (OR = 0.4, p < 0.05). Older participants also had higher CCI and were more likely to have polypharmacy (OR = 1.7, ps < 0.05). Increasing age strongly correlated with worse KPS score (r = -0.232, OR = 1.4, p < 0.001) and worse NFS (r = 0.210, OR = 1.5, p < 0.001). No differences were observed in overall symptom burden, symptom interference, and anxiety/depression scores. DISCUSSION While commonly used GA tools were not available, the study employed patient- and clinician-reported outcomes to identify potential future research directions for the use of GA in the broader neuro-oncology population. Findings illustrate missed opportunities in neuro-oncology practice and underscore the need for incorporation of GA into routine care of this population. Future studies are warranted to further evaluate the prognostic utility of GA and to better understand functional aging outcomes in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dilorom Sass
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Elizabeth Vera
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Anna Choi
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Alvina Acquaye
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Nicole Briceno
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Alexa Christ
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ewa Grajkowska
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Varna Jammula
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jason Levine
- Office of Information Technology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Matthew Lindsley
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jennifer Reyes
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Kayla Roche
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - James L Rogers
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Michael Timmer
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lisa Boris
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc, Frederick, MD, USA
| | - Eric Burton
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Nicole Lollo
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Marissa Panzer
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Marta Penas-Prado
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Valentina Pillai
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lily Polskin
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc, Frederick, MD, USA
| | - Brett J Theeler
- Department of Neurology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jing Wu
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Mark R Gilbert
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Terri S Armstrong
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Heather Leeper
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Lassman AB, Pugh SL, Wang TJC, Aldape K, Gan HK, Preusser M, Vogelbaum MA, Sulman EP, Won M, Zhang P, Moazami G, Macsai MS, Gilbert MR, Bain EE, Blot V, Ansell PJ, Samanta S, Kundu MG, Armstrong TS, Wefel JS, Seidel C, de Vos FY, Hsu S, Cardona AF, Lombardi G, Bentsion D, Peterson RA, Gedye C, Bourg V, Wick A, Curran WJ, Mehta MP. Depatuxizumab mafodotin in EGFR-amplified newly diagnosed glioblastoma: A phase III randomized clinical trial. Neuro Oncol 2022; 25:339-350. [PMID: 35849035 PMCID: PMC9925712 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 50% of newly diagnosed glioblastomas (GBMs) harbor epidermal growth factor receptor gene amplification (EGFR-amp). Preclinical and early-phase clinical data suggested efficacy of depatuxizumab mafodotin (depatux-m), an antibody-drug conjugate comprised of a monoclonal antibody that binds activated EGFR (overexpressed wild-type and EGFRvIII-mutant) linked to a microtubule-inhibitor toxin in EGFR-amp GBMs. METHODS In this phase III trial, adults with centrally confirmed, EGFR-amp newly diagnosed GBM were randomized 1:1 to radiotherapy, temozolomide, and depatux-m/placebo. Corneal epitheliopathy was treated with a combination of protocol-specified prophylactic and supportive measures. There was 85% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) ≤0.75 for overall survival (OS) at a 2.5% 1-sided significance level (ie traditional two-sided p ≤ 0.05) by log-rank testing. RESULTS There were 639 randomized patients (median age 60, range 22-84; 62% men). Prespecified interim analysis found no improvement in OS for depatux-m over placebo (median 18.9 vs. 18.7 months, HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.82-1.26, 1-sided p = 0.63). Progression-free survival was longer for depatux-m than placebo (median 8.0 vs. 6.3 months; HR 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-1.01, p = 0.029), particularly among those with EGFRvIII-mutant (median 8.3 vs. 5.9 months, HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56-0.93, 1-sided p = 0.002) or MGMT unmethylated (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.97; 1-sided p = 0.012) tumors but without an OS improvement. Corneal epitheliopathy occurred in 94% of depatux-m-treated patients (61% grade 3-4), causing 12% to discontinue. CONCLUSIONS Interim analysis demonstrated no OS benefit for depatux-m in treating EGFR-amp newly diagnosed GBM. No new important safety risks were identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew B Lassman
- Corresponding Author: Andrew B. Lassman, MD, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, 710 West 168th Street, New York, NY, USA. ()
| | - Stephanie L Pugh
- RTOG Foundation Statistics and Data Management Center, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Tony J C Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology (in Neurological Surgery), Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA,Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kenneth Aldape
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Hui K Gan
- Cancer Therapies and Biology Group, Centre of Research Excellence in Brain Tumours, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia,La Trobe University School of Cancer Medicine, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia,Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Erik P Sulman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University, Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA,Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Minhee Won
- RTOG Foundation Statistics and Data Management Center, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Golnaz Moazami
- Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Marian S Macsai
- NorthShore University HealthSystem, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Mark R Gilbert
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jeffrey S Wefel
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Filip Y de Vos
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sigmund Hsu
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, McGovern School of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Andrés F Cardona
- Foundation for Clinical and Applied Cancer Research-FICMAC/Clinical and Translational Oncology Group, Brain Tumor Section, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Giuseppe Lombardi
- Department of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | | | | | - Craig Gedye
- Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Véronique Bourg
- Department of Neurology, Côte d’Azur University, Nice, France
| | - Antje Wick
- Heidelberg University Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Minesh P Mehta
- Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Hospital, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Initial results of a phase II trial of 18F-DOPA PET-guided re-irradiation for recurrent high-grade glioma. J Neurooncol 2022; 158:323-330. [PMID: 35583721 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04011-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In-field high-grade glioma (HGG) recurrence is a common challenge with limited treatment options, including re-irradiation. The radiotracer 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[18F]-fluoro-L-phenylalanine (18F-DOPA) crosses the blood brain barrier and demonstrates high uptake in tumor, but low uptake in normal tissue. This study investigated whether 18F-DOPA positron emission tomography (PET) and MRI guided re-irradiation for recurrent HGG may improve progression free survival (PFS). METHODS Adults with recurrent or progressive HGG previously treated with radiation were eligible. The primary endpoint was a 20% improvement from the historical control PFS at 3 months (PFS3) of 20% with systemic therapy alone. Re-RT dose was 35 Gy in 10 fractions. The target volume was MRI T1 contrast-enhancement defined tumor plus 18F-DOPA PET defined tumor. RESULTS Twenty patients completed treatment per protocol. Diagnosis was most commonly glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype (60%). MRI-defined volumes were expanded by a median 43% (0-436%) by utilizing 18F-DOPA PET. PFS3 was 85% (95% CI 63.2-95.8%), meeting the primary endpoint of PFS3 ≥ 40%. With 9.7 months median follow-up, 17 (85%) had progressed and 15 (75%) had died. Median OS from re-RT was 8.8 months. Failure following re-RT was within both the MRI and PET tumor volumes in 75%, MRI only in 13%, PET only in 0%, and neither in 13%. Four (20%) patients experienced grade 3 toxicity, including CNS necrosis (n = 2, both asymptomatic with bevacizumab initiation for radiographic findings), seizures (n = 1), fatigue (n = 1), and nausea (n = 1). No grade 4-5 toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION 18F-DOPA PET-guided re-irradiation for progressive high-grade glioma appears safe and promising for further investigation.
Collapse
|
38
|
Jammula V, Rogers JL, Vera E, Christ A, Leeper HE, Acquaye A, Briceno N, Choi A, Grajkowska E, Levine J, Lindsley M, Reyes J, Roche K, Timmer M, Boris L, Burton E, Lollo N, Panzer M, Smith-Cohn MA, Penas-Prado M, Pillai V, Theeler BJ, Wu J, Gilbert MR, Armstrong TS. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in Neuro-Oncology: A Pilot Study of Feasibility and Utility in Telehealth and In-Person Clinical Assessments. Neurooncol Pract 2022; 9:429-440. [PMID: 36124322 PMCID: PMC9384084 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npac038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Cognitive impairments are a common burden for patients with primary CNS tumors. Neuropsychological assessment batteries can be too lengthy, which limits their use as an objective measure of cognition during routine care. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and utility of the brief Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in routine in-person and telehealth visits (as a result of the global COVID-19 pandemic) with neuro-oncology patients.
Methods
71 adults with primary CNS tumors completed MoCA testing in-person (n=47) and via telehealth (n=24). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including symptom burden and interference, perceived cognition, general health status, and anxiety and depression, were and correlation analysis were included in this study. Feasibility was assessed through a provider satisfaction questionnaire.
Results
Patients were primarily White (83%), college-educated (71%) males (54%) with high grade tumors (66%). The average total score on the MoCA administered in-person was 25 (range: 6-30), with 34% classified as abnormal, and the average total score via telehealth was 26 (range: 12-30), with 29% classified as abnormal. Providers reported satisfaction in using the MoCA during routine clinical care, both in-person and via telehealth. Lower MoCA scores correlated with worse symptom severity, KPS, age, education, and previous treatment.
Conclusions
The MoCA was feasible in clinical and telehealth settings, and its relationship to clinical characteristics and PROs highlight the need for both objective and patient-reported measures of cognition to understand the overall cognitive profile of a patient with a CNS tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Varna Jammula
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - James L Rogers
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Elizabeth Vera
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Alexa Christ
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Heather E Leeper
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Alvina Acquaye
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Nicole Briceno
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Anna Choi
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ewa Grajkowska
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jason Levine
- Office of Information Technology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Matthew Lindsley
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jennifer Reyes
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Kayla Roche
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Michael Timmer
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lisa Boris
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Eric Burton
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Nicole Lollo
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Marissa Panzer
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Matthew A Smith-Cohn
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Marta Penas-Prado
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Valentina Pillai
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Brett J Theeler
- Department of Neurology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jing Wu
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Mark R Gilbert
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Terri S Armstrong
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Yan L, Nichol A, Olson R. Validation of the BC-Brain Patient-Reported Outcome Questionnaire for Patients with Central Nervous System Tumours Treated with Radiotherapy. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:2798-2807. [PMID: 35448202 PMCID: PMC9032610 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29040228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The BC-brain questionnaire was developed by BC Cancer to detect health problems in patients with central nervous system (CNS) tumours in routine clinical care, treated with radiotherapy (RT), as part of the Prospective Outcomes and Support Initiative (POSI). This study aimed to present and validate the BC-brain questionnaire in patients with brain metastases (BrM) treated with RT. The BC-brain questionnaire was constructed with three subscales: mobility, thinking and CNS symptoms. Patients with BrM from five BC Cancer centres completed this questionnaire at first visit and subsequent follow-up appointments. A total of 365 patients finished the first and 105 finished the follow-up questionnaire. Summary scores of each subscale were calculated. Mobility, thinking and subtotal score showed good reliability with Cronbach’s α > 0.7. Multitrait scaling analysis showed good convergent and divergent validity. The correlations between subscales ranged from 0.262 to 0.456 for baseline and from 0.378 to 0.597 for follow-up. Patients on dexamethasone had worse performance. Patients with a KPS of </=70 had worse performance than patients with a KPS of >70. In general, this BC-brain questionnaire has good reliability and validity, and is proper to use as an option for a patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument to measure the quality of life in BrM patients treated with RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling Yan
- BC Cancer-Prince George, Prince George, BC V2M 7E9, Canada;
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Alan Nichol
- BC Cancer-Vancouver, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada;
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Robert Olson
- BC Cancer-Prince George, Prince George, BC V2M 7E9, Canada;
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Rogers JL, De La Cruz Minyety J, Vera E, Acquaye AA, Payén SS, Weinberg JS, Armstrong TS, Weathers SPS. Assessing mobility in primary brain tumor patients: A descriptive feasibility study using two established mobility tests. Neurooncol Pract 2022; 9:219-228. [PMID: 35601968 PMCID: PMC9113321 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npac013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with primary brain tumors (PBT) face significant mobility issues related to their disease and/or treatment. Here, the authors describe the preliminary utility and feasibility of two established mobility measures, the Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) and Five-Times Sit-to-Stand (TSS) tests, in quickly and objectively assessing the mobility status of PBT patients at a single institution's neuro-oncology clinic. Methods Adult patients undergoing routine PBT care completed the TUG/TSS tests and MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor module (MDASI-BT), which assessed symptom burden and interference with daily life, during clinic visits over a 6-month period. Research staff assessed feasibility metrics, including test completion times/rates, and collected demographic, clinical, and treatment data. Mann-Whitney tests, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and Spearman's rho correlations were used to interrogate relationships between TUG/TSS test completion times and patient characteristics. Results The study cohort included 66 PBT patients, 59% male, with a median age of 47 years (range: 20-77). TUG/TSS tests were completed by 62 (94%) patients. Older patients (P < .001) and those who were newly diagnosed (P = .024), on corticosteroids (P = .025), or had poor (≤80) KPS (P < .01) took longer to complete the TUG/TSS tests. Worse activity-related (work, activity, and walking) interference was associated with longer TUG/TSS test completion times (P < .001). Conclusions The TUG/TSS tests are feasible for use among PBT patients and may aid in clinical care. Older age, being newly diagnosed, using corticosteroids, poor (≤80) KPS, and high activity-related interference were associated with significant mobility impairment, highlighting the tests' potential clinical utility. Future investigations are warranted to longitudinally explore feasibility and utility in other practice and disease settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James L Rogers
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA,Corresponding Author: James L. Rogers, BS, Cancer Research Training Award Fellow, Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9030 Old Georgetown Rd., Bethesda, MD 20892, USA ()
| | - Julianie De La Cruz Minyety
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Elizabeth Vera
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Alvina A Acquaye
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Samuel S Payén
- Center for Nursing Research, Cizik School of Nursing, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Weinberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Terri S Armstrong
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Shiao-Pei S Weathers
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Piil K, Laegaard Skovhus S, Tolver A, Jarden M. Neuro-Oncological Symptoms: A Longitudinal Quantitative Study of Family Function, Perceived Support, and Caregiver Burden. JOURNAL OF FAMILY NURSING 2022; 28:43-56. [PMID: 34286624 DOI: 10.1177/10748407211029986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to establish preliminary quantitative evidence for the longitudinal change in family function, perceived support, and caregiver burden, acknowledging that physical and emotional symptoms are important variables for quality of life in families affected by a brain cancer diagnosis. This longitudinal quantitative study measured patient-reported and family member-reported outcomes at four different time points in 1 year. The patients reported that the symptom burden hindered their relationships with other people. Furthermore, the generally high level of strain due to the caregiver burden had an especially negative impact on close social relationships. Data indicate that family functioning was continually negatively affected as perceived by both patients and family caregivers. No significant changes over time were identified. The results underline the importance of providing systematic and ongoing support to the whole family that acknowledges their contribution as a valuable social support system for the individual experiencing high-grade glioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Piil
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
- Aarhus University, Denmark
| | | | | | - Mary Jarden
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
- University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Armstrong TS, Gilbert MR. Clinical trial challenges, design considerations, and outcome measures in rare CNS tumors. Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:S30-S38. [PMID: 34725696 PMCID: PMC8561126 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Clinical research for patients with rare cancers has been very challenging. First and foremost, patient accrual to clinical trials typically requires a network, cooperative group, or even international collaboration in order to achieve the necessary numbers of patients to adequately evaluate a new treatment or intervention. Similar limitations in preclinical models and in the understanding the natural history of the disease or pertinent prognostic factors further impede the development of hypothesis-based, appropriately powered clinical trials. However, despite these challenges, several studies in rare cancers, including ependymoma and subependymal giant cell astrocytoma, have helped to establish new treatment regimens. Importantly, in these seminal trials, patient outcomes measures were critical in describing the clinical benefit derived from the therapy, underscoring the need to incorporate these measures in future trials. While obstacles still remain, novel and creative approaches to clinical trial designs have been developed that can be used to study new treatments for patients with rare cancers, thereby addressing a significant unmet need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terri S Armstrong
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Mark R Gilbert
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Walker JG, Armstrong TS, O'Brien BJ, Gilbert MR, Casarez RL, Fagundes C, Heijnen CJ, Andersen CR, Yuan Y, Wu J, LoBiondo-Wood G. Associations of meaning of illness with psychosocial, clinical, and immunological characteristics in patients with Leptomeningeal metastasis. COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY 2021; 8:100099. [PMID: 35757676 PMCID: PMC9216264 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpnec.2021.100099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) creates symptoms related to both the disease within the nervous system and treatment toxicities. Biologic processes, such as inflammation and behavioral processes, such as the meaning ascribed to illness (Meaning of Illness: MoI), can impact physical and psychosocial symptoms. The aim of this study was to understand the relationships among MoI, physical and psychosocial symptoms, and inflammation in patients with LM. Methods Thirty enrolled participants completed the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor with spine experimental symptoms added. Meaning of illness, quality of life (QoL), and depression were captured by validated instruments. Interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were measured by ELISA. Correlations were performed to assess relationships among the variables. Results Participants were primarily white (73%), female (63%). Median age was 54 years (34–83). Breast (50%) and lung (20%) were most common diagnosis. Higher MoI scores were associated with better QoL (p < .01) and fewer depressive symptoms (p < .01). All CSF samples contained IL-6 and all but one sample had elevated IL-6. Higher levels of IL-6 in the CSF were associated with greater symptom burden (p < .01) and interference of symptoms in daily life (p = .02) but not MoI. Conclusions MoI was associated with QoL and depression. High levels of IL-6 in the CSF were associated with more severe symptoms. This study provides the groundwork for future research, including interventional studies to improve QoL in patients with LM. Ascribing positive meaning to illness is associated with higher reported QoL in patients with LM. High IL-6 in the CSF was associated with increased symptom burden but not depressive symptoms. Fostering meaning in patients with LM may help mood, reduce inflammation, and improve symptoms.
Collapse
|
44
|
Whisenant MS, Srour SA, Williams LA, Subbiah I, Griffin D, Ponce D, Kebriaei P, Neelapu SS, Shpall E, Ahmed S, Wang XS. The Unique Symptom Burden of Patients Receiving CAR T-Cell Therapy. Semin Oncol Nurs 2021; 37:151216. [PMID: 34629213 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2021.151216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Revised: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES There is little research on the patient experience of symptom burden from CAR T-cell therapy, and no validated measure specific to the symptoms of CAR T-cell therapy currently exists. The purpose of this study was to identify symptoms experienced and to determine the content domain for a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measuring symptom burden for patients who had received standard of care CAR T-cell therapy for advanced B-cell lymphoid malignancies. DATA SOURCES Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with a sample of 21 patients who had received CAR T-cell therapy. Content analysis was used to define the symptom burden content domain. CONCLUSION Sixty-two percent of patients were interviewed within 3 months of therapy; 81.0% experienced cytokine release syndrome and 28.6% experienced neurotoxicity. Content analysis found 31 symptoms related to disease and treatment. The most common disease-related symptom identified by patients was pain (43%). The most common symptoms identified by patients as related to CAR T-cell therapy included fatigue (tiredness) (62%), lack of appetite (29%), headache (29%), chills or feeling cold (24%), and feeling confused (24%). The qualitative analysis also confirmed that symptoms interfere with daily activities, work, walking, relationships with others, mood, and enjoyment of life. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE Patients who receive standard CAR T-cell therapy experience numerous symptoms related to disease and CAR T-cell therapy, including symptoms related to the T-cell infusion. Symptoms may result in interference with daily activities, relationships, treatment adherence, and mood. Oncology nurses should be aware of and assess symptom related to CAR T-cell therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meagan S Whisenant
- Department of Symptom Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Department of Research, Cizik School of Nursing, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston.
| | - Samer A Srour
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Loretta A Williams
- Department of Symptom Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Ishwariah Subbiah
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Donna Griffin
- Department of Symptom Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Darcy Ponce
- Department of Symptom Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Department of Research, Cizik School of Nursing, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston
| | - Partow Kebriaei
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Sattva S Neelapu
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Elizabeth Shpall
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Sairah Ahmed
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Xin Shelley Wang
- Department of Symptom Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Wefel JS, Armstrong TS, Pugh SL, Gilbert MR, Wendland MM, Brachman DG, Roof KS, Brown PD, Crocker IR, Robins HI, Hunter G, Won M, Mehta MP. Neurocognitive, symptom, and health-related quality of life outcomes of a randomized trial of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (NRG/RTOG 0825). Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:1125-1138. [PMID: 33515019 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Results of NRG Oncology RTOG 0825 reported adding bevacizumab to standard chemoradiation did not significantly improve survival endpoints and resulted in greater decline in neurocognitive function (NCF) and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) over time in bevacizumab-treated patients. The present report provides additional results of patient-centered outcomes over time and their prognostic association with survival endpoints. METHODS NCF tests, MD Anderson Symptom Inventory - Brain Tumor Module (MDASI-BT), and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life (QOL) questionnaire with brain cancer module (QLQ-C30/BN20) were completed in a subset of progression-free patients at baseline and longitudinally. The prognostic value of baseline and early changes in NCF and PROs and differences between treatments from baseline to follow-up assessments were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 508 randomized patients participated. Baseline/early changes in NCF and PROs were prognostic for OS and PFS. No between-arm differences in time to deterioration were found. At week 6, patients treated with bevacizumab evidenced greater improvement on NCF tests of executive function and the MDASI-BT Cognitive Function scale, but simultaneously reported greater decline on the EORTC Cognitive Function Scale. At later time points (weeks 22, 34, and 46), patients treated with bevacizumab had greater worsening on NCF tests as well as PRO measures of cognitive, communication, social function, motor symptoms, general symptoms, and interference. CONCLUSION The collection of patient-centered clinical outcome assessments in this phase III trial revealed greater deterioration in NCF, symptoms, and QOL in patients treated with bevacizumab. Baseline and early change in NCF and PROs were prognostic for survival endpoints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey S Wefel
- Department of Neuro-Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Terri S Armstrong
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Stephanie L Pugh
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mark R Gilbert
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Merideth M Wendland
- Radiation Oncology, USON-Willamette Valley Cancer Institute, Eugene, Oregon, USA
| | - David G Brachman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Arizona Oncology Services Foundation, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Kevin S Roof
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southeast Cancer Control Consortium, CCOP, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ian R Crocker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - H Ian Robins
- Departments of Medicine and Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Grant Hunter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, Utah, USA
| | - Minhee Won
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Minesh P Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Dirven L, Musoro JZ, Coens C, Reijneveld JC, Taphoorn MJB, Boele FW, Groenvold M, van den Bent MJ, Stupp R, Velikova G, Cocks K, Sprangers MAG, King MT, Flechtner HH, Bottomley A. Establishing anchor-based minimally important differences for the EORTC QLQ-C30 in glioma patients. Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:1327-1336. [PMID: 33598685 PMCID: PMC8328025 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally important differences (MIDs) allow interpretation of the clinical relevance of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) results. This study aimed to estimate MIDs for all European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) scales for interpreting group-level results in brain tumor patients. METHODS Clinical and HRQOL data from three glioma trials were used. Clinical anchors were selected for each EORTC QLQ-C30 scale, based on correlation (>0.30) and clinical plausibility of association. Changes in both HRQOL and the anchors were calculated, and for each scale and time period, patients were categorized into one of the three clinical change groups: deteriorated by one anchor category, no change, or improved by one anchor category. Mean change method and linear regression were applied to estimate MIDs for interpreting within-group change and between-group differences in change over time, respectively. Distribution-based methods were applied to generate supportive evidence. RESULTS A total of 1687 patients were enrolled in the three trials. The retained anchors were performance status and eight Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) scales. MIDs for interpreting within-group change ranged from 4 to 12 points for improvement and -4 to -14 points for deterioration. MIDs for between-group difference in change ranged from 4 to 9 for improvement and -4 to -16 for deterioration. Most anchor-based MIDs were closest to the 0.3 SD distribution-based estimates (range: 3-10). CONCLUSIONS MIDs for the EORTC QLQ-C30 scales generally ranged between 4 and 11 points for both within-group mean change and between-group mean difference in change. These results can be used to interpret QLQ-C30 results from glioma trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Dirven
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Jammbe Z Musoro
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Corneel Coens
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jaap C Reijneveld
- Department of Neurology & Brain Tumor Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martin J B Taphoorn
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Florien W Boele
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Mogens Groenvold
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK
- Departments of Public Health and Palliative Medicine, University of Copenhagen and Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Roger Stupp
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Galina Velikova
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Kim Cocks
- Adelphi Values, Bollington, Cheshire, UK
| | - Mirjam A G Sprangers
- Department of Medical Psychology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Madeleine T King
- Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Hans-Henning Flechtner
- Clinic for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Andrew Bottomley
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Chowdhry AK, Gondi V, Pugh SL. Missing Data in Clinical Studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:1267-1271. [PMID: 33640421 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.02.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Amit K Chowdhry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
| | - Vinai Gondi
- Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center Warrenville and Northwestern Medicine Proton Center, Warrenville, Illinois
| | - Stephanie L Pugh
- NRG Oncology Statistical and Data Management Center, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Kim MM, Sun Y, Aryal MP, Parmar HA, Piert M, Rosen B, Mayo CS, Balter JM, Schipper M, Gabel N, Briceño EM, You D, Heth J, Al-Holou W, Umemura Y, Leung D, Junck L, Wahl DR, Lawrence TS, Cao Y. A Phase 2 Study of Dose-intensified Chemoradiation Using Biologically Based Target Volume Definition in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:792-803. [PMID: 33524546 PMCID: PMC8920120 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.01.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Revised: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We hypothesized that dose-intensified chemoradiation therapy targeting adversely prognostic hypercellular (TVHCV) and hyperperfused (TVCBV) tumor volumes would improve outcomes in patients with glioblastoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS This single-arm, phase 2 trial enrolled adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Patients with a TVHCV/TVCBV >1 cm3, identified using high b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI, were treated over 30 fractions to 75 Gy to the TVHCV/TVCBV with temozolomide. The primary objective was to estimate improvement in 12-month overall survival (OS) versus historical control. Secondary objectives included evaluating the effect of 3-month TVHCV/TVCBV reduction on OS using Cox proportional-hazard regression and characterizing coverage (95% isodose line) of metabolic tumor volumes identified using correlative 11C-methionine positron emission tomography. Clinically meaningful change was assessed for quality of life by the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30, for symptom burden by the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for brain tumor, and for neurocognitive function (NCF) by the Controlled Oral Word Association Test, the Trail Making Test, parts A and B, and the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised. RESULTS Between 2016 and 2018, 26 patients were enrolled. Initial patients were boosted to TVHCV alone, and 13 patients were boosted to both TVHCV/TVCBV. Gross or subtotal resection was performed in 87% of patients; 22% were O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylated. With 26-month follow-up (95% CI, 19-not reached), the 12-month OS rate among patients boosted to the combined TVHCV/TVCBV was 92% (95% CI, 78%-100%; P = .03) and the median OS was 20 months (95% CI, 18-not reached); the median OS for the whole study cohort was 20 months (95% CI, 14-29 months). Patients whose 3-month TVHCV/TVCBV decreased to less than the median volume (3 cm3) had superior OS (29 vs 12 months; P = .02). Only 5 patients had central or in-field failures, and 93% (interquartile range, 59%-100%) of the 11C-methionine metabolic tumor volumes received high-dose coverage. Late grade 3 neurologic toxicity occurred in 2 patients. Among non-progressing patients, 1-month and 7-month deterioration in quality of life, symptoms, and NCF were similar in incidence to standard therapy. CONCLUSIONS Dose intensification against hypercellular/hyperperfused tumor regions in glioblastoma yields promising OS with favorable outcomes for NCF, symptom burden, and quality of life, particularly among patients with greater tumor reduction 3 months after radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle M Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
| | - Yilun Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Madhava P Aryal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Hemant A Parmar
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Morand Piert
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Benjamin Rosen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Charles S Mayo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - James M Balter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Matthew Schipper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Nicolette Gabel
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Emily M Briceño
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Daekeun You
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Jason Heth
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Wajd Al-Holou
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Yoshie Umemura
- Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Denise Leung
- Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Larry Junck
- Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Daniel R Wahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Theodore S Lawrence
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Yue Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
Background. Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumor in adults. Although frequently histologically benign, the clinical severity of a lesion may range from being asymptomatic to causing severe impairment of global function and well-being. The diversity of intracranial locations and clinical phenotypes poses a challenge when studying functional impairments, however, more recent attention to patient-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) have helped to improve our understanding of how meningioma may impact a patient’s life.Methods. Treatment strategies such as observation, surgery, radiation, or a combination thereof have been examined to ascertain their contributions to symptoms, physical and cognitive functioning, disability, and general aspects of daily functioning.Results. This review explores the multidimensional nature of HRQOL and how patients may be influenced by meningiomas and their treatment.Conclusion. Overall, treatment of symptomatic meningiomas is associated with improved HRQOL, cognitive functioning, and seizure control while tumor size, location, histologic grade, and epileptic burden are associated with worse HRQOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sameah Haider
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hermelin Brain Tumor Center, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Martin J B Taphoorn
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Katharine J Drummond
- Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tobias Walbert
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hermelin Brain Tumor Center, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Wu J, Yuan Y, Long Priel DA, Fink D, Peer CJ, Sissung TM, Su YT, Pang Y, Yu G, Butler MK, Mendoza TR, Vera E, Ahmad S, Bryla C, Lindsley M, Grajkowska E, Mentges K, Boris L, Antony R, Garren N, Siegel C, Lollo N, Cordova C, Aboud O, Theeler BJ, Burton EM, Penas-Prado M, Leeper H, Gonzales J, Armstrong TS, Calvo KR, Figg WD, Kuhns DB, Gallin JI, Gilbert MR. Phase I Study of Zotiraciclib in Combination with Temozolomide for Patients with Recurrent High-grade Astrocytomas. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:3298-3306. [PMID: 33785481 PMCID: PMC8197750 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-4730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Revised: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the toxicity profile and establish an optimal dosing schedule of zotiraciclib with temozolomide in patients with recurrent high-grade astrocytoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS This two-stage phase I trial determined the MTD of zotiraciclib combined with either dose-dense (Arm1) or metronomic (Arm2) temozolomide using a Bayesian Optimal Interval design; then a randomized cohort expansion compared the progression-free survival rate at 4 months (PFS4) of the two arms for an efficient determination of a temozolomide schedule to combine with zotiraciclib at MTD. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenomic profiling were included. Patient-reported outcome was evaluated by longitudinal symptom burden. RESULTS Fifty-three patients were enrolled. Dose-limiting toxicities were neutropenia, diarrhea, elevated liver enzymes, and fatigue. MTD of zotiraciclib was 250 mg in both arms and thus selected for the cohort expansion. Dose-dense temozolomide plus zotiraciclib (PSF4 40%) compared favorably with metronomic temozolomide (PFS4 25%). Symptom burden worsened at cycle 2 but stabilized by cycle 4 in both arms. A significant decrease in absolute neutrophil count and neutrophil reactive oxygen species production occurred 12-24 hours after an oral dose of zotiraciclib but both recovered by 72 hours. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacogenomic analyses revealed that the CYP1A2_5347T>C (rs2470890) polymorphism was associated with higher AUCinf value. CONCLUSIONS Zotiraciclib combined with temozolomide is safe in patients with recurrent high-grade astrocytomas. Zotiraciclib-induced neutropenia can be profound but mostly transient, warranting close monitoring rather than treatment discontinuation. Once validated, polymorphisms predicting drug metabolism may allow personalized dosing of zotiraciclib.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Wu
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
| | - Ying Yuan
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Debra A Long Priel
- Neutrophil Monitoring Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland
| | - Danielle Fink
- Neutrophil Monitoring Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland
| | - Cody J Peer
- Clinical Pharmacology Program, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Tristan M Sissung
- Clinical Pharmacology Program, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Yu-Ting Su
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Ying Pang
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Guangyang Yu
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Madison K Butler
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Tito R Mendoza
- Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Elizabeth Vera
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - Christine Bryla
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Matthew Lindsley
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Ewa Grajkowska
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Kelly Mentges
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Lisa Boris
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Ramya Antony
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Nancy Garren
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Christine Siegel
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Nicole Lollo
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Christine Cordova
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Orwa Aboud
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Brett J Theeler
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Eric M Burton
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Marta Penas-Prado
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Heather Leeper
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Javier Gonzales
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Terri S Armstrong
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - William D Figg
- Clinical Pharmacology Program, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Douglas B Kuhns
- Neutrophil Monitoring Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland
| | | | - Mark R Gilbert
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|