1
|
Abdelrahman EM, Zidan AM, Sapri AS, Shoulah AA, Seif O, Halawa SM, Sobhy MG, Tantawy RF, Abdelraouf OR, Elgazzar SA. The utility and outcomes of the temporalis muscle flap for palate reconstruction after maxillectomy for malignancy. Asian J Surg 2024:S1015-9584(24)02043-8. [PMID: 39271317 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.08.245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2024] [Revised: 08/02/2024] [Accepted: 08/22/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACK GROUND A common pedicled facial technique in head and neck reconstruction is the TMF It can be utilised to replace missing tissues in a variety of conditions, including oral deformities of the hard and soft palate. AIM Aim of the study was to document the utility and outcomes with the reconstruction of the palate using TM flaps following Maxillectomy For maxillary sinus malignancies. METHODOLOGY The study included 24 patients who were operated on for cancer maxilla and eligible for maxillectomy and reconstruction of the Palate using temporalis flap. Follow-up was planned for at least 12 months postoperative. Postoperative physical and speech therapy are initiated to help improve speech and swallow outcomes and to prevent trismus. RESULTS The current study included 24 cases with Maxillary sinus cancer with a mean age of 42.34 ± 4.67. The mean operative time was 5.4 ± 1.22 h with no reported intraoperative bleeding or injury of important structures. No cases of facial palsy or trismus were reported while partial flap loss was reported in one case where oronasal fistula was evident. The donor site complications were minimal where seroma occurred in two patients and alopecia, wound infection and dehiscence were reported in one case each. The donor site depression was evident in 25 % of cases. CONCLUSION TMF is an excellent option for the reconstruction of many craniofacial defects, it is easy to be harvested with good blood supply with minimal postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emad M Abdelrahman
- General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Egypt.
| | - Ahmed M Zidan
- General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Egypt
| | | | - Ahmed A Shoulah
- Plastic Surgery Unit, Benha Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Egypt
| | - Ola Seif
- Plastic Surgery Unit, Benha Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Egypt
| | - Samir M Halawa
- Fellowship of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Benha University Hospital, Egypt
| | | | - Rami F Tantawy
- Otolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Egypt
| | - Osama R Abdelraouf
- Physical Therapy Program, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, 21442, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sherif A Elgazzar
- General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yoshida T, Sasaki K, Hayakawa T, Kawadai T, Shibasaki T, Kawasaki Y. Recommendation for reducing the crystalline lens exposure dose by reducing imaging field width in cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy: an anthropomorphic phantom study. Radiol Phys Technol 2024; 17:629-636. [PMID: 38691308 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-024-00810-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Revised: 03/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
In cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) of the head, we evaluated the exposure dose reduction effect to the crystalline lens and position-matching accuracy by narrowing one side (X2) of the X-ray aperture (blade) in the X-direction. We defined the ocular surface dose of the head phantom as the crystalline lens exposure dose and measured using a radiophotoluminescence dosimeter (RPLD, GD-352 M) in the preset field (13.6 cm) and in each of the fields when blade X2 aperture was reduced in 0.5 cm increments from 10.0 to 5.0 cm. Auto-bone matching was performed on CBCT images acquired five times with blade X2 aperture set to 13.6 cm and 5.0 cm at each position when the head phantom was moved from - 5.0 to + 5.0 mm in 1.0 mm increment. The maximum reduction rate in the crystalline lens exposure dose was - 38.7% for the right lens and - 13.2% for the left lens when blade X2 aperture was 5.0 cm. The maximum difference in the amount of position correction between blade X2 aperture of 13.6 cm and 5.0 cm was 1 mm, and the accuracy of auto-bone matching was similar. In CBCT of the head, reduced blade X2 aperture is a useful technique for reducing the crystalline lens exposure dose while ensuring the accuracy of position matching.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsuya Yoshida
- Department of Radiology, Koritsu Tatebayashi Kosei General Hospital, Gunma, Japan.
- Graduate School of Radiological Technology, Gunma Prefectural College of Health Sciences, Gunma, Japan.
| | - Koji Sasaki
- Graduate School of Radiological Technology, Gunma Prefectural College of Health Sciences, Gunma, Japan
| | - Tomoki Hayakawa
- Department of Radiology, Koritsu Tatebayashi Kosei General Hospital, Gunma, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Kawadai
- Department of Radiology, Koritsu Tatebayashi Kosei General Hospital, Gunma, Japan
| | - Takako Shibasaki
- Department of Radiology, Koritsu Tatebayashi Kosei General Hospital, Gunma, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Keizer ME, Hovinga KE, Lacko M, Eekers DB, Baijens LW, Kremer B, Temel Y. Clinical Outcome in Patients with Large Sinonasal Tumors with Intracranial Extension. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2024; 85:347-357. [PMID: 38966298 PMCID: PMC11221902 DOI: 10.1055/a-2082-4951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives Malignant tumors of the sinonasal cavities with extension to the frontal skull base are rare and challenging pathologies. Combined-approach surgery using a frontobasal craniotomy and endoscopic sinus surgery with reconstruction of the anterior skull base followed by adjuvant radiotherapy is a preferred treatment strategy in selected cases. Morbidity and mortality rates are high in this population. We aim to add our experience to the current literature. Design We performed a retrospective cross-sectional single center study of the long-term clinical outcome in a tertiary university referral hospital in the Netherlands between 2010 and 2021. Descriptive statistics and frequency distributions were performed Participants Patient, tumor, treatment, complications and survival characteristics of eighteen consecutive patients were extracted from the electronic health records. Main Outcome Measures The primary outcome measures are progression free survival, overall survival and complication rate. Results Eighteen consecutive patients were included with a mean age of 61 (SD ± 10) years (range 38-80); ten males and eight females. Gross total resection was achieved in 14 (77%) patients. Eleven (61%) patients underwent local radiotherapy, one (5%) chemotherapy and three (17%) a combination of both. Mean follow-up duration was 49 months (range 3 - 138). Three (17%) patients died in hospital due to post-operative complications. Six (33%) patients died during follow-up due to disease progression. Mean progression-free survival was 47 months (range 0 - 113). Conclusion In conclusion, the overall survival was 50% for this group of patients with large sinonasal tumors. Progressive disease affects survival rate severely. Surgical complications were seen in five (28%) patients. Radiotherapy is associated with high complication rates. Radiation necrosis was a serious complication in two patients and could be treated with high dose steroids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max E. Keizer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre + , Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Dutch Academic Alliance Skull Base Pathology, Maastricht/Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Koos E. Hovinga
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre + , Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Dutch Academic Alliance Skull Base Pathology, Maastricht/Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Martin Lacko
- Dutch Academic Alliance Skull Base Pathology, Maastricht/Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre + , Maastricht, The Netherlands
- School for Oncology and Reproduction (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Centre + , Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Danielle B.P. Eekers
- Dutch Academic Alliance Skull Base Pathology, Maastricht/Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- School for Oncology and Reproduction (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Centre + , Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Laura W.J. Baijens
- Dutch Academic Alliance Skull Base Pathology, Maastricht/Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre + , Maastricht, The Netherlands
- School for Oncology and Reproduction (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Centre + , Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bernd Kremer
- Dutch Academic Alliance Skull Base Pathology, Maastricht/Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre + , Maastricht, The Netherlands
- School for Oncology and Reproduction (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Centre + , Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Yasin Temel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre + , Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Dutch Academic Alliance Skull Base Pathology, Maastricht/Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Levy BB, Biasio MJD, Toledo NA, Das S, Bartling M, Aldahari F, de Almeida JR, Weinreb I, Chan Y. Sinonasal Malignancy Following Cranial Irradiation: A Scoping Review and Case Report of Sinonasal Teratocarcinosarcoma. J Neurol Surg Rep 2024; 85:e101-e111. [PMID: 38974921 PMCID: PMC11226344 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1788310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Radiation therapy is a mainstay of treatment for brain tumors, but delayed complications include secondary malignancy which may occur months to years after treatment completion. Methods We reviewed the medical records of a 41-year-old female treated with 60 Gy of radiation for a recurrent astrocytoma, who 6 years later developed a locally advanced sinonasal teratocarcinosarcoma. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science to conduct a scoping review of biopsy-proven sinonasal malignancy in patients who previously received cranial irradiation for a brain tumor. Results To our knowledge, this is the first report of a patient to present with a sinonasal teratocarcinosarcoma after receiving irradiation for a brain tumor. Our scoping review of 1,907 studies produced 14 similar cases of secondary sinonasal malignancy. Median age of primary cancer diagnosis was 39.5 years old (standard deviation [SD]: 21.9), and median radiation dose was 54 Gy (SD: 20.3). Median latency time between the primary cancer and secondary sinonasal cancer was 9.5 years (SD: 5.8). Olfactory neuroblastoma was the most common sinonasal cancer ( n = 4). Fifty percent of patients died from their sinonasal cancer within 1.5 years. Conclusion Patients who receive radiation exposure to the sinonasal region for treatment of a primary brain tumor, including low doses or scatter radiation, may be at risk of a secondary sinonasal malignancy later in life. Physicians who monitor at-risk patients must be vigilant of symptoms which may suggest sinonasal malignancy, and surveillance should include radiographic review with careful monitoring for a secondary malignancy throughout the entire irradiated field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben B. Levy
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Nilo Alvarez Toledo
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sunit Das
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mandolin Bartling
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fahad Aldahari
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John R. de Almeida
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ilan Weinreb
- Department of Pathology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pathobiology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yvonne Chan
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Duru Birgi S, Özkaya Akagündüz Ö, Dagdelen M, Yazici G, Canyilmaz E, Ceylaner Biçakçi B, Çetinayak HO, Baltalarli PB, Demiröz Abakay C, Kaydihan N, Delikgöz Soykut E, Erdiş E, Akyürek S, Esassolak M, Uzel ÖE, Bakirarar B, Cengiz M. Radiotherapy Results in Locally Advanced Sinonasal Cancer: Turkish Society for Radiation Oncology, Head and Neck Study Group 01-005. Am J Clin Oncol 2024; 47:279-288. [PMID: 38390915 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000001089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aims to examine the treatment outcomes and related factors in locally advanced sinonasal cancer across Turkiye. METHODS Twelve centers participants of the Turkish Society for Radiation Oncology Head and Neck Study Group attended the study. One hundred and ninety-four patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy between 2001 and 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Acute and late toxicity were recorded per Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events V4.0. RESULTS The median age was 58 years and 70% were male. The majority of tumors were located in maxillary sinus (59%). Most of the patients (%83) had T3 and T4A disease. Fifty-three percent of patients were in stage 4A. Radiotherapy was administered to 80% of the patients in the adjuvant settings. Median 66 Gy dose was administered in median 31 fractions. Chemotherapy was administered concomitantly with radiotherapy in 45% of the patients mostly with weekly cisplatin. No grade ≥4 acute and late toxicity was observed. The median follow-up was 43 months. The 5-year and 10-year overall survival (OS); locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS); distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 61% and 47%; 69% and 61%; 72%, and 69%, and 56% and 49%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, several factors demonstrated significant influence on OS, such as performance status, surgery, and lymph node involvement. Moreover, surgery was the key prognostic factor for LRFS. For DMFS, lymph node involvement and surgical margin were found to be influential factors. In addition, performance status and lymph node involvement were identified as significantly affecting PFS. CONCLUSIONS In our study, the authors obtained promising results with IMRT. Performance status, lymph node involvement, and surgery emerged as the primary factors significantly influencing OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Meltem Dagdelen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cerrahpaşa University Faculty of Medicine
| | - Gözde Yazici
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara
| | - Emine Canyilmaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Karadeniz Technical University Faculty of Medicine, Trabzon
| | | | - Hasan O Çetinayak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir
| | - Papatya B Baltalarli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Pamukkale University Faculty of Medicine, Denizli
| | | | - Nuri Kaydihan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Bahçelievler Hospital, İstanbul
| | - Ela Delikgöz Soykut
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsun Training and Research Hospital, Samsun
| | - Eda Erdiş
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sivas Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Medicine, Sivas, Turkey
| | | | | | - Ömer E Uzel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cerrahpaşa University Faculty of Medicine
| | | | - Mustafa Cengiz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Park CJ, Choi SH, Kim D, Kim SB, Han K, Ahn SS, Lee WH, Choi EC, Keum KC, Kim J. MRI radiomics may predict early tumor recurrence in patients with sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:3151-3159. [PMID: 37926740 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10389-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) follows a poor prognosis with high tendency for local recurrence. We aimed to evaluate whether MRI radiomics can predict early local failure in sinonasal SCC. METHODS Sixty-eight consecutive patients with node-negative sinonasal SCC (January 2005-December 2020) were enrolled, allocated to the training (n = 47) and test sets (n = 21). Early local failure, which occurred within 12 months of completion of initial treatment, was the primary endpoint. For clinical features (age, location, treatment modality, and clinical T stage), binary logistic regression analysis was performed. For 186 extracted radiomic features, different feature selections and classifiers were combined to create two prediction models: (1) a pure radiomics model; and (2) a combined model with clinical features and radiomics. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were calculated and compared using DeLong's method. RESULTS Early local failure occurred in 38.3% (18/47) and 23.8% (5/21) in the training and test sets, respectively. We identified several radiomic features which were strongly associated with early local failure. In the test set, both the best-performing radiomics model and the combined model (clinical + radiomic features) yielded higher AUCs compared to the clinical model (AUC, 0.838 vs. 0.438, p = 0.020; 0.850 vs. 0.438, p = 0.016, respectively). The performances of the best-performing radiomics model and the combined model did not differ significantly (AUC, 0.838 vs. 0.850, p = 0.904). CONCLUSION MRI radiomics integrated with a machine learning classifier may predict early local failure in patients with sinonasal SCC. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT MRI radiomics intergrated with machine learning classifiers may predict early local failure in sinonasal squamous cell carcinomas more accurately than the clinical model. KEY POINTS • A subset of radiomic features which showed significant association with early local failure in patients with sinonasal squamous cell carcinomas was identified. • MRI radiomics integrated with machine learning classifiers can predict early local failure with high accuracy, which was validated in the test set (area under the curve = 0.838). • The combined clinical and radiomics model yielded superior performance for early local failure prediction compared to that of the radiomics (area under the curve 0.850 vs. 0.838 in the test set), without a statistically significant difference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chae Jung Park
- Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seo Hee Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dain Kim
- Graduate School of Artificial Intelligence, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, Republic of Korea
| | - Si Been Kim
- Undergraduate School of Biomedical Engineering, Korea University College of Health Science, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyunghwa Han
- Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea
| | - Sung Soo Ahn
- Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea
| | - Won Hee Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun Chang Choi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ki Chang Keum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jinna Kim
- Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Weusthof K, Held T, Lang K, Rachel ZE, Harrabi SB, Plath K, Freudlsperger C, Herfarth K, Debus J, Haberer T, Münter M, Jensen AD, Adeberg S. Combined Photon and Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy for Sinonasal Malignancies: Results of the HIT-SNT Prospective Phase 2 Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:1563-1574. [PMID: 37866761 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.09.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiation treatment of sinonasal malignancies is a challenging task due to proximity to critical structures of the head and neck and skull base. Local tumor control is highly dose-dependent, but dose application is limited due to accompanying toxicity and dose constraints. To evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of combined radiation treatment with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and carbon ion boost, we conducted a prospective phase 2 IMRT-Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Sinonasal Tumors (HIT-SNT) trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 2011 and 2019, we treated 35 patients with histologically proven, incompletely resected or inoperable adeno- (51%) or squamous cell carcinoma (49%) of the paranasal sinuses with combined IMRT (50 Gy) and carbon ion boost (24 Gy relative biologic effectiveness) to a total dose of 74 Gy. RESULTS Acute mucositis Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 3 occurred in 12% of patients (n = 4) and was accompanied by odynophagia CTCAE grade 3. Except for 1 case of grade 3 weight loss, no other acute high-grade toxicity (grade 3-4) was observed. In a small patient cohort of 15 patients eligible for long-term follow-up we have seen no high-grade (grade ≥3) long-term side effects 2 years after radiation therapy. None of these patients suffered from therapy-associated vision or hearing loss. Secondary endpoints were 2-year overall survival, 2-year local progression-free survival, 2-year progression-free survival, and 2-year metastases-free survival with 79.4%, 61.8%, 61.8%, and 64.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this is the first prospective data on toxicity and outcome of bimodal radiation therapy for the rare entity of sinonasal malignancies. Our study shows a low rate of CTCAE-reported acute toxicity with reasonable tumor control and survival rates after bimodal radiation therapy, which therefore remains a therapy approach to be further evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Weusthof
- National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Thomas Held
- National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Zoe E Rachel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi B Harrabi
- National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Klaus Herfarth
- National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Haberer
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marc Münter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | | | - Sebastian Adeberg
- National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology and; Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (MIT), Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Marburg University Hospital, Marburg, Germany; UCT - Universitäres Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen Frankfurt-Marburg
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liu Q, Huang X, Chen X, Zhang J, Wang J, Qu Y, Wang K, Wu R, Zhang Y, Xiao J, Yi J, Luo J. Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Resection versus Open Surgery for Locally Advanced Sinonasal Malignancies in Combination with Radiotherapy. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2024; 85:28-37. [PMID: 38274487 PMCID: PMC10807958 DOI: 10.1055/a-1980-8567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Our objective was to compare the long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection versus open surgery in combination with radiotherapy for locally advanced sinonasal malignancies (SNMs). Methods Data for continuous patients with sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma who received surgery (endoscopic or open surgery) combined with radiotherapy in our center between January 1999 and December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. A 1:1 matching with propensity scores was performed. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local recurrence rate (LRR) were evaluated. Results We identified 267 eligible patients, 90 of whom were included after matching: 45 patients in the endoscopy group and 45 in the open group. The median follow-up time was 87 months. In the endoscopic group, 84.4% of patients received intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), with a mean gross tumor volume (GTV) dose of 68.28 Gy; in the open surgery group, 64.4% of patients received IMRT, with a mean GTV dose of 64 Gy. The 5-year OS, PFS, and LRR were 69.9, 58.6, and 24.5% in the endoscopic group and 64.6, 54.4, and 31.8% in the open surgery group, respectively. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that the surgical approach was not associated with lower OS, PFS, or LRR. The overall postoperative complications were 13% in the endoscopic group, while 21.7% in the open group. Conclusion For patients with locally advanced SNMs, minimally invasive endoscopic resection, in combination with a higher radiation dose and new radiation techniques such as IMRT, yields survival outcomes similar to those of open surgery in combination with radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaodong Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xuesong Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianghu Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Jingbo Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuan Qu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Kai Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Runye Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Ye Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianping Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Junlin Yi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Jingwei Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kuan EC, Wang EW, Adappa ND, Beswick DM, London NR, Su SY, Wang MB, Abuzeid WM, Alexiev B, Alt JA, Antognoni P, Alonso-Basanta M, Batra PS, Bhayani M, Bell D, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Betz CS, Blay JY, Bleier BS, Bonilla-Velez J, Callejas C, Carrau RL, Casiano RR, Castelnuovo P, Chandra RK, Chatzinakis V, Chen SB, Chiu AG, Choby G, Chowdhury NI, Citardi MJ, Cohen MA, Dagan R, Dalfino G, Dallan I, Dassi CS, de Almeida J, Dei Tos AP, DelGaudio JM, Ebert CS, El-Sayed IH, Eloy JA, Evans JJ, Fang CH, Farrell NF, Ferrari M, Fischbein N, Folbe A, Fokkens WJ, Fox MG, Lund VJ, Gallia GL, Gardner PA, Geltzeiler M, Georgalas C, Getz AE, Govindaraj S, Gray ST, Grayson JW, Gross BA, Grube JG, Guo R, Ha PK, Halderman AA, Hanna EY, Harvey RJ, Hernandez SC, Holtzman AL, Hopkins C, Huang Z, Huang Z, Humphreys IM, Hwang PH, Iloreta AM, Ishii M, Ivan ME, Jafari A, Kennedy DW, Khan M, Kimple AJ, Kingdom TT, Knisely A, Kuo YJ, Lal D, Lamarre ED, Lan MY, Le H, Lechner M, Lee NY, Lee JK, Lee VH, Levine CG, Lin JC, Lin DT, Lobo BC, Locke T, Luong AU, Magliocca KR, Markovic SN, Matnjani G, McKean EL, Meço C, Mendenhall WM, Michel L, Na'ara S, Nicolai P, Nuss DW, Nyquist GG, Oakley GM, Omura K, Orlandi RR, Otori N, Papagiannopoulos P, Patel ZM, Pfister DG, Phan J, Psaltis AJ, Rabinowitz MR, Ramanathan M, Rimmer R, Rosen MR, Sanusi O, Sargi ZB, Schafhausen P, Schlosser RJ, Sedaghat AR, Senior BA, Shrivastava R, Sindwani R, Smith TL, Smith KA, Snyderman CH, Solares CA, Sreenath SB, Stamm A, Stölzel K, Sumer B, Surda P, Tajudeen BA, Thompson LDR, Thorp BD, Tong CCL, Tsang RK, Turner JH, Turri-Zanoni M, Udager AM, van Zele T, VanKoevering K, Welch KC, Wise SK, Witterick IJ, Won TB, Wong SN, Woodworth BA, Wormald PJ, Yao WC, Yeh CF, Zhou B, Palmer JN. International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2024; 14:149-608. [PMID: 37658764 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sinonasal neoplasms, whether benign and malignant, pose a significant challenge to clinicians and represent a model area for multidisciplinary collaboration in order to optimize patient care. The International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors (ICSNT) aims to summarize the best available evidence and presents 48 thematic and histopathology-based topics spanning the field. METHODS In accordance with prior International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology documents, ICSNT assigned each topic as an Evidence-Based Review with Recommendations, Evidence-Based Review, and Literature Review based on the level of evidence. An international group of multidisciplinary author teams were assembled for the topic reviews using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses format, and completed sections underwent a thorough and iterative consensus-building process. The final document underwent rigorous synthesis and review prior to publication. RESULTS The ICSNT document consists of four major sections: general principles, benign neoplasms and lesions, malignant neoplasms, and quality of life and surveillance. It covers 48 conceptual and/or histopathology-based topics relevant to sinonasal neoplasms and masses. Topics with a high level of evidence provided specific recommendations, while other areas summarized the current state of evidence. A final section highlights research opportunities and future directions, contributing to advancing knowledge and community intervention. CONCLUSION As an embodiment of the multidisciplinary and collaborative model of care in sinonasal neoplasms and masses, ICSNT was designed as a comprehensive, international, and multidisciplinary collaborative endeavor. Its primary objective is to summarize the existing evidence in the field of sinonasal neoplasms and masses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward C Kuan
- Departments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Eric W Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nithin D Adappa
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Daniel M Beswick
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Nyall R London
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Sinonasal and Skull Base Tumor Program, Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Shirley Y Su
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Marilene B Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Waleed M Abuzeid
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Borislav Alexiev
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jeremiah A Alt
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Paolo Antognoni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Michelle Alonso-Basanta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Pete S Batra
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mihir Bhayani
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Diana Bell
- Department of Pathology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Manuel Bernal-Sprekelsen
- Otorhinolaryngology Department, Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Christian S Betz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, UNICANCER, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - Benjamin S Bleier
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Juliana Bonilla-Velez
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Claudio Callejas
- Department of Otolaryngology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Ricardo L Carrau
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Roy R Casiano
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Paolo Castelnuovo
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Rakesh K Chandra
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Simon B Chen
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Alexander G Chiu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Garret Choby
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Naweed I Chowdhury
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Martin J Citardi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Marc A Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Roi Dagan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Gianluca Dalfino
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Iacopo Dallan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - John de Almeida
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angelo P Dei Tos
- Section of Pathology, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - John M DelGaudio
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Charles S Ebert
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ivan H El-Sayed
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jean Anderson Eloy
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - James J Evans
- Department of Neurological Surgery and Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christina H Fang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, The University Hospital for Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Nyssa F Farrell
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Marco Ferrari
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Nancy Fischbein
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Adam Folbe
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
| | - Wytske J Fokkens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Meha G Fox
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Gary L Gallia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Paul A Gardner
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mathew Geltzeiler
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Christos Georgalas
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Anne E Getz
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Satish Govindaraj
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Stacey T Gray
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jessica W Grayson
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Bradley A Gross
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jordon G Grube
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Ruifeng Guo
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Patrick K Ha
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Ashleigh A Halderman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Ehab Y Hanna
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Richard J Harvey
- Rhinology and Skull Base Research Group, Applied Medical Research Centre, University of South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephen C Hernandez
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Adam L Holtzman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Claire Hopkins
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Guys and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Zhigang Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenxiao Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Ian M Humphreys
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Peter H Hwang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Alfred M Iloreta
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Masaru Ishii
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Michael E Ivan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Aria Jafari
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - David W Kennedy
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mohemmed Khan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Adam J Kimple
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Todd T Kingdom
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Anna Knisely
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Ying-Ju Kuo
- Department of Pathology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Devyani Lal
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Eric D Lamarre
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Ming-Ying Lan
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hien Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Matt Lechner
- UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jivianne K Lee
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Victor H Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Corinna G Levine
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Jin-Ching Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Derrick T Lin
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Brian C Lobo
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Tran Locke
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Amber U Luong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kelly R Magliocca
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Svetomir N Markovic
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Gesa Matnjani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Erin L McKean
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Cem Meço
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Salzburg Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - William M Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Loren Michel
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Shorook Na'ara
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Piero Nicolai
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Daniel W Nuss
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Gurston G Nyquist
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gretchen M Oakley
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Kazuhiro Omura
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Richard R Orlandi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Nobuyoshi Otori
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Peter Papagiannopoulos
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Zara M Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - David G Pfister
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alkis J Psaltis
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Mindy R Rabinowitz
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Murugappan Ramanathan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ryan Rimmer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Marc R Rosen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Olabisi Sanusi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Zoukaa B Sargi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Philippe Schafhausen
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Ahmad R Sedaghat
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Brent A Senior
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Raj Shrivastava
- Department of Neurosurgery and Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Raj Sindwani
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Timothy L Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Kristine A Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Carl H Snyderman
- Departments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - C Arturo Solares
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Satyan B Sreenath
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Aldo Stamm
- São Paulo ENT Center (COF), Edmundo Vasconcelos Complex, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Katharina Stölzel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Baran Sumer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Pavol Surda
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Guys and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Bobby A Tajudeen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Brian D Thorp
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Charles C L Tong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Raymond K Tsang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Justin H Turner
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Mario Turri-Zanoni
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Aaron M Udager
- Department of Pathology, Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Thibaut van Zele
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Kyle VanKoevering
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Kevin C Welch
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Sarah K Wise
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ian J Witterick
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tae-Bin Won
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Stephanie N Wong
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Bradford A Woodworth
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Peter-John Wormald
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - William C Yao
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Chien-Fu Yeh
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Bing Zhou
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - James N Palmer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Levyn H, Yang F, Lee NY. Radiation oncology for the rhinologist. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2024; 32:5-13. [PMID: 38116957 DOI: 10.1097/moo.0000000000000942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This comprehensive review explores evolving treatment strategies for sinonasal and nasopharyngeal malignancies. It analyzes the role of adjuvant radiotherapy, the potential of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), and the relevance of de-escalation strategies nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Additionally, it discusses hyperfractionation in re-irradiation in NPC. RECENT FINDINGS Adjuvant radiotherapy remains pivotal for sinonasal tumors, improving locoregional control and survival, notably in squamous cell carcinomas, adenocarcinomas, and adenoid cystic carcinomas. IMPT promises enhanced outcomes by sparing healthy tissues, potentially improving patients' quality of life. For select stage II/T3N0 NPC, radiotherapy alone offers comparable outcomes to concurrent chemoradiotherapy, with fewer adverse events and improved quality of life. Selective neck irradiation in NPC patients with uninvolved necks maintains oncologic outcomes while reducing late toxicity. Hyperfractionation in re-irradiation shows promise in lowering late toxicities and improving overall survival, particularly in undifferentiated sinonasal carcinomas. SUMMARY This review underscores the significance of adjuvant radiotherapy and the potential of advanced radiation techniques in optimizing sinonasal and nasopharyngeal malignancy outcomes. It emphasizes evolving de-escalation methods and individualized, evidence-based approaches. Future research will further refine strategies for these challenging malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fan Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Quashie EE, Li XA, Prior P, Awan M, Schultz C, Tai A. Obtaining organ-specific radiobiological parameters from clinical data for radiation therapy planning of head and neck cancers. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:245015. [PMID: 37903437 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad07f5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/01/2023]
Abstract
Objective.Different radiation therapy (RT) strategies, e.g. conventional fractionation RT (CFRT), hypofractionation RT (HFRT), stereotactic body RT (SBRT), adaptive RT, and re-irradiation are often used to treat head and neck (HN) cancers. Combining and/or comparing these strategies requires calculating biological effective dose (BED). The purpose of this study is to develop a practical process to estimate organ-specific radiobiologic model parameters that may be used for BED calculations in individualized RT planning for HN cancers.Approach.Clinical dose constraint data for CFRT, HFRT and SBRT for 5 organs at risk (OARs) namely spinal cord, brainstem, brachial plexus, optic pathway, and esophagus obtained from literature were analyzed. These clinical data correspond to a particular endpoint. The linear-quadratic (LQ) and linear-quadratic-linear (LQ-L) models were used to fit these clinical data and extract relevant model parameters (alpha/beta ratio, gamma/alpha,dTand BED) from the iso-effective curve. The dose constraints in terms of equivalent physical dose in 2 Gy-fraction (EQD2) were calculated using the obtained parameters.Main results.The LQ-L and LQ models fitted clinical data well from the CFRT to SBRT with the LQ-L representing a better fit for most of the OARs. The alpha/beta values for LQ-L (LQ) were found to be 2.72 (2.11) Gy, 0.55 (0.30) Gy, 2.82 (2.90) Gy, 6.57 (3.86) Gy, 5.38 (4.71) Gy, and the dose constraint EQD2 were 55.91 (54.90) Gy, 57.35 (56.79) Gy, 57.54 (56.35) Gy, 60.13 (59.72) Gy and 65.66 (64.50) Gy for spinal cord, optic pathway, brainstem, brachial plexus, and esophagus, respectively. Additional two LQ-L parametersdTwere 5.24 Gy, 5.09 Gy, 7.00 Gy, 5.23 Gy, and 6.16 Gy, and gamma/alpha were 7.91, 34.02, 8.67, 5.62 and 4.95.Significance.A practical process was developed to extract organ-specific radiobiological model parameters from clinical data. The obtained parameters can be used for biologically based radiation planning such as calculating dose constraints of different fractionation regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edwin E Quashie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, WI 53226, United States of America
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, RI 02903, United States of America
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI 02903, United States of America
| | - X Allen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, WI 53226, United States of America
| | - Phillip Prior
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, WI 53226, United States of America
| | - Musaddiq Awan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, WI 53226, United States of America
| | - Christopher Schultz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, WI 53226, United States of America
| | - An Tai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, WI 53226, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Niyazi M, Andratschke N, Bendszus M, Chalmers AJ, Erridge SC, Galldiks N, Lagerwaard FJ, Navarria P, Munck Af Rosenschöld P, Ricardi U, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Belka C, Minniti G. ESTRO-EANO guideline on target delineation and radiotherapy details for glioblastoma. Radiother Oncol 2023; 184:109663. [PMID: 37059335 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Target delineation in glioblastoma is still a matter of extensive research and debate. This guideline aims to update the existing joint European consensus on delineation of the clinical target volume (CTV) in adult glioblastoma patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS The ESTRO Guidelines Committee identified 14 European experts in close interaction with the ESTRO clinical committee and EANO who discussed and analysed the body of evidence concerning contemporary glioblastoma target delineation, then took part in a two-step modified Delphi process to address open questions. RESULTS Several key issues were identified and are discussed including i) pre-treatment steps and immobilisation, ii) target delineation and the use of standard and novel imaging techniques, and iii) technical aspects of treatment including planning techniques and fractionation. Based on the EORTC recommendation focusing on the resection cavity and residual enhancing regions on T1-sequences with the addition of a reduced 15 mm margin, special situations are presented with corresponding potential adaptations depending on the specific clinical situation. CONCLUSIONS The EORTC consensus recommends a single clinical target volume definition based on postoperative contrast-enhanced T1 abnormalities, using isotropic margins without the need to cone down. A PTV margin based on the individual mask system and IGRT procedures available is advised; this should usually be no greater than 3 mm when using IGRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Munich, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany.
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Martin Bendszus
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Sara C Erridge
- Edinburgh Centre for Neuro-Oncology, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 1EU, UK
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany; Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Frank J Lagerwaard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pierina Navarria
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Per Munck Af Rosenschöld
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, and Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | | | | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Munich, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Dept. of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pala M, Vrana A, Novakova P, Drbohlavova T, Podlesak T. Long-term results of postoperative and definitive (chemo)radiotherapy in sinonasal carcinoma. Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 score as a predictor of survival. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2023; 28:147-158. [PMID: 37456702 PMCID: PMC10348334 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2023.0017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The objective was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of curative radiotherapy in patients with sinonasal carcinoma and to identify prognostic factors influencing treatment outcomes. Materials and methods The authors conducted a retrospective study of 61 consecutive patients treated with postoperative or definitive radiotherapy from 2002 to 2018 (median age 59 years, current/former smokers 71%, maxillary sinus 67%, nasal cavity 26%). The majority of patients were diagnosed with locally advanced disease (85% clinical stage ≥ III). Regional cervical metastases were initially diagnosed in 23% of patients. The most common histology was squamous cell carcinoma (61%). Radiation therapy was preceded by radical surgery in 64% of patients. 29 patients received chemotherapy (48%). Results The median follow-up was 53 months. The median total dose of radiotherapy achieved was 70 Gy. The 5- and 10-year locoregional control, distant control, overall survival, and disease-free survival were 74% and 64%, 90% and 90%, 51% and 35%, and 38% and 25%, respectively. Severe acute toxicity occurred in 36%, severe late toxicity in 23% of patients. Severe unilateral visual impairment occurred in 6 patients, temporal lobe necrosis in 1 patient, and osteoradionecrosis requiring surgery in 2 patients. Conclusion The results of the study demonstrated the high effectiveness of curative treatment in patients with sinonasal carcinoma with long-term locoregional and distant control. The multivariate analysis indicated that N-staging, age, comorbidity score [as assessed by Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 (ACE-27)] and initial response to treatment were the strongest prognostic factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miloslav Pala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bulovka University Hospital, Institute of Radiation Oncology, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Antonin Vrana
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bulovka University Hospital, Institute of Radiation Oncology, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Pavla Novakova
- Radiophysics Department, Bulovka University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Tereza Drbohlavova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bulovka University Hospital, Institute of Radiation Oncology, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Tomas Podlesak
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Bulovka University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ranz-Colio Á, Almeida-Parra F, De Leyva-Moreno P, Cárdenas-Serres C, García-Cosío M, Acero-Sanz J. Navigation-guided resection of locally advanced midface malignancies. Does it improve the safety of oncologic resection? Oral Oncol 2023; 143:106455. [PMID: 37295064 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2023.106455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2023] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Treatment of malignant midface tumors is a surgical challenge with an increased difficulty to obtain free surgical margins. The computer assisted surgery (CAS) and intraoperative navigation (ION) can be very helpful in complex midface resections. The main objective of this paper is to evaluate if the ION could improve the rate of free surgical margins in locally advanced midface malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective cohort study was performed including 40 patients with a locally advanced malignant midface tumor (T4a/b) surgically treated from September 2016 to September 2022. Patients were divided in two groups, a control group included 20 patients operated on without ION and the study group included 20 patients treated with Navigation assisted surgery. A systematic analysis was performed comparing surgical margins in both groups. RESULTS Squamous cell carcinoma was the most common histological type. Oral cavity was the most common primary location. Overall, considering each specimen as an hexahedrium, 240 surgical margins were analyzed. 15 out of 120 margins analyzed in the navigation group (12.5 %) were positive while 30 out of 120 margins analyzed in control group (25 %) were affected (p 0.013). Concerning margin location, the ION group showed less involvement of the upper surface of specimen than in control group (p 0.048). CONCLUSION Navigation Assisted Surgery seems to improve the rate of free surgical margins in patients with locally advanced midface malignancies, specially concerning involvement of the superior margin. Further studies are recommended to corroborate these results and its potential influence in survival rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Álvaro Ranz-Colio
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon in Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Puerta de Hierro University Hospital, Majadahonda, Spain; University of Alcala de Henares, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Fernando Almeida-Parra
- Puerta de Hierro University Hospital, Majadahonda, Spain; University of Alcala de Henares, Madrid, Spain; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon in the Head and Neck Oncology Section in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Patricia De Leyva-Moreno
- Puerta de Hierro University Hospital, Majadahonda, Spain; University of Alcala de Henares, Madrid, Spain; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon in the Head and Neck Oncology Section in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Cárdenas-Serres
- Puerta de Hierro University Hospital, Majadahonda, Spain; University of Alcala de Henares, Madrid, Spain; Resident of the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mónica García-Cosío
- University of Alcala de Henares, Madrid, Spain; Pathology Department, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Julio Acero-Sanz
- Puerta de Hierro University Hospital, Majadahonda, Spain; University of Alcala de Henares, Madrid, Spain; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Results of Primary Treatment and Salvage Treatment in the Management of Patients with Non-Squamous Cell Malignant Tumors of the Sinonasal Region: Single Institution Experience. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12051953. [PMID: 36902738 PMCID: PMC10004315 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12051953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Revised: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Non-squamous cell carcinoma-related malignant sinonasal tract tumors (non-SCC MSTT) are rare and diverse malignancies. In this study, we report our experience in the management of this group of patients. The treatment outcome has been presented, involving both primary treatment and salvage approaches. Data from 61 patients treated radically due to non-SCC MSTT between 2000 and 2016 at the National Cancer Research Institute, Gliwice branch, were analyzed. The group consisted of the following pathological subtypes of MSTT: adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC), undifferentiated sinonasal carcinoma (USC), sarcoma, olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB), adenocarcinoma, small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SNC), mucoepidermic carcinoma (MEC), and acinic cell carcinoma, which were found in nineteen (31%), seventeen (28%), seven (11.5%), seven (11.5%), five (8%), three (5%), two (3%) and one (2%) of patients, respectively. There were 28 (46%) males and 33 (54%) females at the median age of 51 years. Maxilla was the primary tumor localization followed by the nasal cavity and ethmoid sinus in thirty-one (51%), twenty (32.5%), and seven (11.5%) patients, respectively. In 46 (74%) patients, an advanced tumor stage (T3 or T4) was diagnosed. Primary nodal involvement (N) was found in three (5%) cases, and all patients underwent radical treatment. The combined treatment consisted of surgery and radiotherapy (RT) and was given to 52 (85%) patients. The probabilities of overall survival (OS), locoregional control (LRC), metastases-free survival (MFS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed in pathological subtypes and grouped together, along with the ratio and effectiveness of salvage. Locoregional treatment failure was seen in 21 (34%) patients. Salvage treatment was performed in fifteen (71%) patients and was effective in nine (60%) cases. There was a significant difference in OS between patients who underwent salvage and those who did not (median: 40 months vs. 7 months, p = 0.01). In the group of patients who underwent salvage, OS was significantly longer when the procedure was effective (median: 80.5 months) than if it failed (median: 20.5 months), p < 0.0001. OS in patients after effective salvage was the same as in patients who were primary cured (median: 80.5 months vs. 88 months, p = 0.8). Distant metastases developed in ten (16%) patients. Five and ten year LRC, MFS, DFS, and OS were 69%, 83%, 60%, 70%, and 58%, 83%, 47%, 49%, respectively. The best treatment results were observed for patients with adenocarcinoma and sarcoma, while USC gave the poorest results in our set of patients. In this study, we indicate that salvage is possible in most patients with non-SCC MSTT with locoregional failure and that it may significantly prolong their overall survival.
Collapse
|
16
|
Issa K, Teitelbaum J, Smith BD, Wang F, Ackall F, Sargi Z, Rangarajan SV, Jung SH, Jang DW, Abi Hachem R. Nasal Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Factors Associated With Treatment Outcomes and Potential Organ Preservation. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2022; 37:35-42. [DOI: 10.1177/19458924221130133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background Squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal cavity (NCSCC) is a rare, challenging malignancy. Surgical resection of this tumor can cause significant facial deformity, and indications for adjuvant or organ preservation therapies are not well-described. Objective To examine the impact of treatment regimen on survival outcomes in NCSCC and to compare surgical to non-surgical based therapies. Methods The National Cancer Database was queried for NCSCC from 2004 to 2014. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment regimen were compared for the entire cohort. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was performed for statistical analysis of treatment regimen and surgical margins on overall survival (OS) for early and late-stage disease. Results A total of 1883 NCSCC patients were identified. The OS for the cohort was 83 months, and median age at diagnosis was 65 years. NCSCC patients who underwent surgery followed by adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) had a better OS compared to definitive RT (HR: 0.58, P < .001). In early stage NCSCC (T1/T2, N0), there was no significant difference in OS between patients treated with surgery only or surgery with adjuvant RT compared to definitive RT. In advanced stage NCSCC, surgery with adjuvant RT had a better OS compared to definitive chemoradiation. Having positive margins was shown to predict a worse OS when compared to negative margins in surgical patients despite adjuvant RT or chemoradiation. Conclusions NCSCC appears to be best treated with surgery followed by adjuvant RT in advanced-stage disease whereas in early-stage disease, surgery does not improve OS compared to definitive RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khalil Issa
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jordan Teitelbaum
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Blaine D. Smith
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Frances Wang
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Feras Ackall
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Zoukaa Sargi
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - Sanjeet V. Rangarajan
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Sin-Ho Jung
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - David W Jang
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Ralph Abi Hachem
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Keerio AA, Qayyum MU, Kashif A, Dhanani R, Rashid A, Faisal M, Hussain R, Jamshed A. Treatment Outcomes of Maxillary Sinus Squamous Cell Carcinoma at a Dedicated Cancer Institute: A Retrospective Study. Cureus 2022; 14:e25644. [PMID: 35795498 PMCID: PMC9251351 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.25644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Squamous cell carcinoma arising at the maxillary sinus is a rare neoplasm, characterized by an aggressive growth pattern and glooming prognosis. The proximity of the maxillary sinus with complex anatomical structures such as the eye, skull base, infratemporal fossa, pterygomaxillary fossa, nasal cavities, and ethmoid sinuses makes the surgical treatment of tumors infiltrating into these structures very challenging. The study's objective was to investigate the prognostic factors of survival and maxillary sinus SCC treatment outcomes. Methods We did a retrospective analysis of patients treated for maxillary sinus SCC at our institution between 2004 -2018. The study included all the patients with histologically proven maxillary sinus SCC treated with curative intent. The medical record of 43 patients was reviewed and utilized for the analysis. The Kaplan-Meier curve calculated five-year overall survival. Results A total of 43 patients were analyzed. At the presentation time, the mean age was 54.56 years (SD ± 11.65). Smoking (n=13, 30.2%) was the common risk factor. 36 (83.7%) patients presented with stage IV disease. Surgery was performed in 16 (37.2%) patients, whereas 27 (62.8%) patients received radiation and chemotherapy. Treatment failure was seen in 35 (81.4%) patients with locoregional recurrence in 30 (85.7%) patients and distant metastases in 5 (14.3%) patients. The five years overall survival in our study was 22%. Loco-regional recurrence and distant metastasis were the significant factors impacting survival (p=0.01). Conclusion Maxillary sinus SCC is rare cancer that is more common in males and usually presents at an advanced stage with a poor outcome. These tumors have a higher rate of treatment failure with a poor prognosis. Locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis adversely impact the overall survival.
Collapse
|
18
|
Kacorzyk U, Rutkowski TW. The Role of Salvage in the Management of Patients with Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10061266. [PMID: 35740287 PMCID: PMC9220057 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10061266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives: This paper presents and discusses the rate and outcome of salvage according to various factors for patients with sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC). Methods: Data of 79 patients treated radically due to SNSCC between 2000 and 2016 in the National Cancer Research Institute, Gliwice branch, were analyzed. Surgery was the primary treatment in 63 (79%) of patients. The ratio, type, and effectiveness of salvage was assessed and correlated with prognostic factors. Probabilities of overall survival (OS), local control (LC), nodal control (NC), and locoregional control (LRC) were assessed and compared between the groups. Results: The 5-year LC, NC, and LRC survival rates were 62%, 75%, and 53%, respectively. The 5-year OS rate was 51%. In 34 (43%) patients, treatment failure was reported, and salvage was performed in 17 (50%) of them. It was shown that patients after any salvage had significantly longer 2- and 3-year OS rates when compared to patients with no salvage: 52% vs. 7% and 38% vs. 0%, respectively (p = 0.004). Two- and three-year OS rates for patients after effective and ineffective salvage were 83% vs. 33% and 83% vs. 11%, respectively (p = 0.02). For patients with effective salvage, OS did not differ significantly when compared to the OS of primarily cured patients (p = 0.6). Conclusions: For SNSCC patients after treatment failure, salvage is possible in half of the cases and can improve their overall survival even if not finally successful. Moreover, effective salvage can compensate for the failure and give the same ultimate OS as in primarily cured patients.
Collapse
|
19
|
Adilbay D, Valero C, Fitzgerald C, Yuan A, Mimica X, Gupta P, Wong RJ, Shah JP, Patel SG, Ganly I, Cohen MA. Outcomes in surgical management of sinonasal malignancy-A single comprehensive cancer center experience. Head Neck 2022; 44:933-942. [PMID: 35080076 PMCID: PMC8904299 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sinonasal malignancies are a complex and diverse group of tumors. Over the past five decades, treatment advances have changed the management paradigms for these tumors. Our aim was to analyze the outcomes of patients from a comprehensive cancer center. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively assessed 400 patients with sinonasal malignancies treated with surgery at our center between 1973 and 2015. Multiple variables were reviewed to assess the influence on 5-year outcomes. RESULTS The median age was 56 years (IQR 46.8-68). Two hundred and fifty-nine (65%) were males and 141 (35%) were females. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) improved in the last analyzed decade. Orbital invasion, advanced pT-classification and pN-classification, and melanoma histology were associated with poorer outcomes. CONCLUSION Treatment outcomes for patients with sinonasal malignancy have improved over time. This is likely multifactorial with advances in surgical technique, adjuvant treatment, and patient selection. pT-classification, pN-classification, orbital invasion, and histology are predictive of survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dauren Adilbay
- Department of Surgery, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Cristina Valero
- Department of Surgery, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Conall Fitzgerald
- Department of Surgery, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Avery Yuan
- Department of Surgery, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ximena Mimica
- Department of Surgery, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Piyush Gupta
- Department of Surgery, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Richard J Wong
- Department of Surgery, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jatin P Shah
- Department of Surgery, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Snehal G Patel
- Department of Surgery, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ian Ganly
- Department of Surgery, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Marc A Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Karp JM, Hu KS, Persky M, Persky M, Jacobson A, Tran T, Li Z, Givi B, Tam MM. Including Surgical Resection in the Multimodal Management of Very Locally Advanced Sinonasal Cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 167:494-500. [PMID: 34962843 DOI: 10.1177/01945998211067503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Sinonasal cancer often presents as locoregionally advanced disease. National guidelines recommend management of stage T4b tumors with systemic therapy and radiotherapy, but recent studies suggest that including surgical resection in the multimodal treatment of these tumors may improve local control and survival. We queried the National Cancer Database to examine patterns of care and outcomes in T4b sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). STUDY DESIGN Prospectively gathered data. SETTING National Cancer Database. METHODS Patients with T4b N0-3 M0 sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma diagnosed in 2004 to 2016 were stratified between those who received chemoradiotherapy and those who underwent surgical resection with neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment. The overall survival of each cohort was assessed via Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models, with repeat analysis after reweighting of data via inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS Among 805 patients included in analysis, 2-year overall survival for patients undergoing surgical resection was 60.8% (95% CI, 56.1%-65.9%), while for patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy it was 46.7% (95% CI, 41.9%-52.0%). On Cox regression analysis, the inclusion of surgery in management was associated with improved survival in univariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.723 [95% CI, 0.606-0.862]; P < .001) and multivariate analysis (HR, 0.739 [95% CI, 0.618-0.885]; P = .001). Results with reweighted data were consistent in univariate analysis (HR, 0.765 [95% CI, 0.636-0.920]; P = .004]). CONCLUSION Surgical treatment with neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment for stage T4b sinonasal SCC was associated with promising survival outcomes, suggesting a role for incorporating surgery in treatment of select T4b SCC, particularly when removal of all macroscopic disease is feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerome M Karp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kenneth S Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michael Persky
- Department of Otolaryngology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mark Persky
- Department of Otolaryngology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Adam Jacobson
- Department of Otolaryngology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Theresa Tran
- Department of Otolaryngology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Zujun Li
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Babak Givi
- Department of Otolaryngology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Moses M Tam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lewis L, Kreinbrink P, Richardson M, Westerfield M, Doberstein M, Zhang Y, Redmond K, Takiar V. Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Better Spares Non-Adjacent Organs and Reduces the Risk of Secondary Malignant Neoplasms in the Treatment of Sinonasal Cancers. Med Dosim 2021; 47:117-122. [PMID: 34952761 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2021.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Revised: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
This study compare dosimetric parameters and secondary malignancy risk (SMN) using intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for the treatment of sinonasal cancer (SC). After IRB-approval, 10 patients previously treated with IMPT for cancers of the ethmoid, sphenoid, maxillary, or frontal sinuses were identified. Dosimetrists blinded to the IMPT plans generated VMAT plans for comparison. Volume coverage and dose to organs at risk (OAR) were recorded and compared. Organ equivalent dose (OED) of tissues outside of the treatment volume was used to define the excess absolute and relative risk of SMNs. In all cases, both VMAT and IMPT provided acceptable target volume coverage and were able to meet OAR constraints. IMPT was superior for brain V10, V30, and mean, brainstem D0.01 ipsilateral cochlea V30, contralateral cochlea mean, contralateral lacrimal gland mean, contralateral parotid mean, spinal cord D0.01 and body outside of the CTV V10, V20, and V30. VMAT was superior for ipsilateral eye mean, ipsilateral lens mean, CTV V100 and maximum hotspot. The relative risk of SMNs with VMAT compared to IMPT is 3.35 (95% CI, 1.92-5.89). For the treatment of SC, IMPT spares OARs that are not immediately adjacent to the treatment volume and reduces the risk of SMNs when compared to VMAT. VMAT spares OARs abutting the target volume better than IMPT and has more homogenous target coverage. Tumors of the ethmoid sinus, benefit more from IMPT, while tumors located elsewhere require application of our findings on a case by case basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke Lewis
- University of Cincinnati, Department of Radiation Oncology, Barrett Cancer Center, ML 0757, 234 Goodman Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45219, USA
| | - Paul Kreinbrink
- University of Cincinnati, Department of Radiation Oncology, Barrett Cancer Center, ML 0757, 234 Goodman Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45219, USA
| | - Max Richardson
- University of Cincinnati, Department of Radiation Oncology, Barrett Cancer Center, ML 0757, 234 Goodman Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45219, USA
| | - Morgan Westerfield
- University of Cincinnati, Department of Radiation Oncology, Barrett Cancer Center, ML 0757, 234 Goodman Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45219, USA
| | - Madeline Doberstein
- University of Cincinnati, Department of Radiation Oncology, Barrett Cancer Center, ML 0757, 234 Goodman Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45219, USA
| | - Yongbin Zhang
- University of Cincinnati, Department of Radiation Oncology, Barrett Cancer Center, ML 0757, 234 Goodman Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45219, USA
| | - Kevin Redmond
- University of Cincinnati, Department of Radiation Oncology, Barrett Cancer Center, ML 0757, 234 Goodman Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45219, USA
| | - Vinita Takiar
- University of Cincinnati, Department of Radiation Oncology, Barrett Cancer Center, ML 0757, 234 Goodman Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45219, USA; Cincinnati VA Medical Center, 3200 Vine Street, Cincinnati, OH 45220, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Iyizoba-Ebozue Z, Fleming JC, Prestwich RJD, Thomson DJ. Management of sinonasal cancers: Survey of UK practice and literature overview. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 48:32-43. [PMID: 34840009 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.11.124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2021] [Revised: 10/31/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sinonasal malignancy is a rare and heterogenous disease, with limited evidence to guide management. This report summarises the findings of a UK survey and expert workshop discussion which took place to inform design of a proposed UK trial to assess proton beam therapy versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy. METHOD A multidisciplinary working group constructed an online survey to assess current approaches within the UK to surgical and non-surgical practice. Head and neck clinical oncologists, ear nose and throat (ENT) and oral-maxillofacial (OMF) surgeons were invited to participate in the 42-question survey in September 2020. The Royal College of Radiologists Consensus model was adopted in establishing categories to indicate strength of response. An expert panel conducted a virtual workshop in November 2020 to discuss areas of disagreement. RESULTS A survey was sent to 140 UK-based clinicians with 63 responses (45% response rate) from 30 centres, representing a broad geographical spread. Participants comprised 35 clinical oncologists (56%) and 29 surgeons (44%; 20 ENT and 9 OMF surgeons). There were variations in preferred sequence and combination of treatment modalities for locally advanced maxillary squamous cell carcinoma and sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma. There was discordant surgical management of the orbit, dura, and neck. There was lack of consensus for radiotherapy in post-operative dose fractionation, target volume delineation, use of multiple dose levels and treatment planning approach to organs-at-risk. CONCLUSION There was wide variation across UK centres in the management of sinonasal carcinomas. There is need to standardise UK practice and develop an evidence base for treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jason C Fleming
- Liverpool Head & Neck Centre, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, The University of Liverpool Cancer Research Centre, Liverpool
| | | | - David J Thomson
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester and Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Combined Exoscopic and Endoscopic Technique for Craniofacial Resection. Curr Oncol 2021; 28:3945-3958. [PMID: 34677254 PMCID: PMC8535086 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28050336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
We determined the feasibility of the combined exoscopic-endoscopic technique (CEE) as an alternative to the microscope in craniofacial resection (CFR). This retrospective study was conducted at a single institution and included eight consecutive patients with head and neck tumors who underwent CFR between September 2019 and July 2021. During the transcranial approach, microsurgery was performed using an exoscope in the same manner as in traditional microscopic surgery, and an endoscope was used at the blind spot of the exoscope. The exoscope provided images of sufficient quality to perform microsurgery, while the sphenoid sinus lumen was the blind spot of the exoscope during anterior (n = 3) and anterolateral CFR (n = 2), and the medial aspect of the temporal bone was the blind spot of the exoscope during temporal bone resection (n = 2). These blind spots were visualized by the endoscope to facilitate accurate transection of the skull base. The advantages of the exoscope and endoscope include compact size, ergonomics, surgical field accessibility, and equal visual experience for neurosurgeons and head and neck surgeons, which enabled simultaneous transcranial and transfacial surgical procedures. All the surgeries were successful without any relevant complications. CEE is effective in transcranial skull base surgery, especially CFR involving simultaneous surgical procedures.
Collapse
|
24
|
Dhanani R, Faisal M, Shahid H, Malik KI, Jamshed A, Hussain R. Outcomes of Management of Sinonasal Malignancies at a Dedicated Cancer Institution: A Retrospective Study. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2021; 11:115-120. [PMID: 34522665 PMCID: PMC8407647 DOI: 10.4103/ams.ams_16_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2021] [Revised: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Sinonasal malignancies (SNMs) are a rare and heterogeneous group of cancers with an incidence of 3%-5% of all head-and-neck tumours. The aim of the present study was to identify the characteristic features of SNMs and to analyze the treatment outcomes and the prognostic factors affecting it. Materials and Methods A retrospective review of patients with SNM treated at a dedicated cancer center of Pakistan between 2004 and 2018 was carried out. All patients with histologically proven diagnosis of malignancy arising from nasal cavity or paranasal sinuses and being treated with curative intent were included. The medical records of 184 cases were utilized for final analysis. Chi-square test was applied to identify significant differences. Five-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was calculated using Kaplan-Meier curve via log-rank test and comparison was made between squamous and nonsquamous histologies. P ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Squamous cell carcinoma was the most common histopathology (n = 62, 33.7%). 130 (70.7%) patients presented with stage IV disease. Nodal metastasis was seen in 24 (13%) patients. Treatment failure was seen in 96 (52.2%) patients and was significantly associated with tumour size and the overall stage. DSS of patients with squamous cell carcinoma was 29% as compared to 52% for patients with nonsquamous histologies (P = 0.001). Discussion SNM is a diverse group of cancers presenting in late stages. A higher rate of treatment failure associated significantly with stage of the disease was identified in our study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahim Dhanani
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Faisal
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Hamza Shahid
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Kashif Iqbal Malik
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Arif Jamshed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Raza Hussain
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Lahore, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Dagan R, Uezono H, Bryant C, Holtzman AL, Morris CG, Mendenhall WM. Long-term Outcomes from Proton Therapy for Sinonasal Cancers. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:200-212. [PMID: 34285947 PMCID: PMC8270098 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00068.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To report long-term disease control, survival, and toxicity after proton therapy for sinonasal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS We reviewed 143 cases of adults with nonmetastatic sinonasal cancers treated with primary (18%; n = 26) or adjuvant (82%; n = 117) proton therapy. The most common histologies were squamous cell carcinoma (29%; n = 42), olfactory neuroblastoma (23%; n = 33), and adenoid cystic carcinoma (16%; n = 23). Patients had predominantly advanced-stage disease (T3, 24%, n = 35; T4, 66%, n = 94) and high-grade histology (52%; n = 74). Surgery included endoscopic resection alone (50%) with craniotomy (10%) or open resection (40%), and 31% had gross disease present at radiotherapy. Most (91%) received high-dose (median, 73.6 Gy radiobiological equivalent [GyRBE]; 84% >70 GyRBE) passive-scatter proton therapy using accelerated hyperfractionation (1.2 GyRBE twice daily) and concurrent chemotherapy (70%). Univariate and multivariate models assessed prognostic factors. Grade 3+ toxicities were recorded per Common Terminology Criteria, version 4. Median follow-up was 3.4 years (range, 0.1-12.5 years) overall and 4.9 years (range, 0.9-12.5 years) for living patients. RESULTS The 5-year outcomes were as follows: local control (LC), 80%; neck control, 96%; local-regional control, 78%; freedom from distant metastases, 71%; and disease-free survival, 62%; cause-specific survival, 64%; and overall survival, 59%. Surgery improved LC, but only with gross total resection (5-year LC 87% versus subtotal resection 62.9%, and biopsy alone 55% (P < 0.001). Gross residual disease was the only significant prognostic factor for local-regional control on multivariate analysis. High-grade, T4, and local recurrence were associated with decreased overall survival. Late (G3+) toxicity occurred in 22% (32 of 143), including central nervous system necrosis and vision loss in 6% (9 of 143) and 3.5% (5 of 143), respectively. CONCLUSION Proton therapy after gross-total resection provides excellent long-term LC in patients with locally advanced, high-grade sinonasal cancer. Moreover, LC remains strongly associated with long-term survival. With gross disease, about 60% of patients had long-term LC with proton therapy and induction or concurrent chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roi Dagan
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Haruka Uezono
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Curtis Bryant
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Adam L. Holtzman
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Christopher G. Morris
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - William M. Mendenhall
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Klymenko O, Buchberger AMS, Wollenberg B, Wolff KD, Kehl V, Combs SE, Pickhard A, Pigorsch SU. Radiooncological View on Therapy Outcome after Multidisciplinary Treatment of Sinonasal Tumors. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13102364. [PMID: 34068905 PMCID: PMC8157068 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13102364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Revised: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Tumors of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinus are rare. Most are discovered at a locally advanced stage and require multimodal treatment consisting of surgery and radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy. Tumor localization between the eyes and near the brain makes treatment planning difficult due to the necessary consideration of both critical normal tissue with high protection priority and the curative aim of the best radiotherapy dose deposit. Thus, it is noteworthy how tumor volumes impact the five-year survival outcome. Therefore, we investigated initial tumor volumes before any therapy. Patients with larger mean initial tumor volumes of more than 75 cm3 had worse outcomes. There was no additional benefit of upfront surgery. Especially for patients with large tumor burdens of the nasal cavity or paranasal sinus, an interdisciplinary case discussion with the patient is essential in the process of shared decision-making. Abstract Purpose: We report the outcome of a mono-institutional retrospective study of sinonasal carcinoma with the primary focus on GTV (gross tumor volume) and the effect of radiotherapy. Methods: 53 patients with sinonasal carcinoma and that of the nasal cavity, paranasal sinus or both except lymphoma were included. All patients were treated between 1999 and 2017. For tumor volume delineation, all pre-therapeutic images were fused to the planning CT (computed tomography). Results: The median follow-up was 17 months [0.3–60], the median age 60 years, 35 males and 18 females were included. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (60.4%) was the predominant histology, followed by adenocarcinoma (15.1%). The mean composite OS (overall survival) time was 33.3 ± 3.5 months. There was no significant difference in the 5 y composite OS between tumor localization or radiotherapy setting. The simultaneous integrated boost concept showed a trend towards improving five-year composite OS compared to the sequential boost concept. The only factor with a significant impact on the 5 y composite OS rate was the pre-therapeutic GTV (cutoff 75 cm3; p = 0.033). The GTV ≥ 100 cm3 has no effect on the 5 y composite OS rate for SCC. Conclusions: The pre-therapeutic GTV is a prognostic factor for five-year composite OS for the entire group of patients with sinonasal tumors, influencing the outcome after completion of all treatment strategies. The GTV seems to not influence five-year composite OS in SCC. For this rare tumor entity, an intensive, multidisciplinary discussion is essential to finding the best treatment option for the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olena Klymenko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany; (O.K.); (S.E.C.)
| | - Anna Maria Stefanie Buchberger
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, Head and Neck Surgery, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany; (A.M.S.B.); (B.W.)
| | - Barbara Wollenberg
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, Head and Neck Surgery, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany; (A.M.S.B.); (B.W.)
| | - Klaus-Dietrich Wolff
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany;
| | - Victoria Kehl
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Str. 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany; (V.K.); (A.P.)
| | - Stephanie E. Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany; (O.K.); (S.E.C.)
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Anja Pickhard
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Str. 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany; (V.K.); (A.P.)
| | - Steffi U. Pigorsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany; (O.K.); (S.E.C.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-089-4140-4501
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Laskar SG, Pai P, Sinha S, Budrukkar A, Nair D, Swain M, Mummudi N, Gupta T, Murthy V, Agarwal JP, Tiwari N, Thiagrajan S, Chaukar D, Chaturvedi P, Pantvaidya G, Deshmukh A, Nair S, Prabhash K, Joshi A, Noronha V, Patil V, Menon N, Patil A, Bal M, Mittal N, Rane S. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for nasal cavity and paranasal sinus tumors: Experience from a single institute. Head Neck 2021; 43:2045-2057. [PMID: 33687114 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 02/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess the efficacy of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for tumors of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinus (PNS) region. MATERIALS AND METHODS Two hundred fourteen patients with tumors of the nasal cavity and PNS region treated with curative intent IMRT between 2007 and 2019 were included in this retrospective analysis. RESULTS Fifty-one (24.1%) received definitive RT/CTRT and 163 (75.9%) received adjuvant RT. Most common histology was squamous cell carcinoma (26.1%) followed by adenoid cystic carcinoma (21.5%). The median follow-up was 43.5 months. The 5-year local control (LC), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 66.9%, 59%, and 73.9%, respectively. On univariate analysis treatment with nonsurgical modality, T classification and undifferentiated/poorly differentiated histology were associated with inferior 5-year LC, EFS, and OS. Four patients had late Grade 3/Grade 4 ocular toxicity. CONCLUSIONS IMRT should be the standard of care for tumors of PNS region across all histologies and treatment setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarbani Ghosh Laskar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Prathamesh Pai
- Department of Head & Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Shwetabh Sinha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Ashwini Budrukkar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Deepa Nair
- Department of Head & Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Monali Swain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Naveen Mummudi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Tejpal Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Vedang Murthy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Jai Prakash Agarwal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Neelesh Tiwari
- Department of Head & Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Shiva Thiagrajan
- Department of Head & Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Devendra Chaukar
- Department of Head & Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Pankaj Chaturvedi
- Department of Head & Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Gouri Pantvaidya
- Department of Head & Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Anuja Deshmukh
- Department of Head & Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sudhir Nair
- Department of Head & Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Kumar Prabhash
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Amit Joshi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Vanita Noronha
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Vijay Patil
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Nandini Menon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Asawari Patil
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Munita Bal
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Neha Mittal
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Swapnil Rane
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Zeng Q, Tian Y, He Y, Xie Q, Ou L, Wang M, Chen W, Wei R. Long-Term Survival Outcomes and Treatment Experience of 64 Patients With Esthesioneuroblastoma. Front Oncol 2021; 11:624960. [PMID: 33747939 PMCID: PMC7969639 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.624960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Esthesioneuroblastoma (ENB) is a rare sinonasal malignancy, lacking a unified staging system and treatment. Management at a single center was retrospectively evaluated to inform future treatment options and prognostic factors. Methods: Clinical data of 64 consecutive ENB patients, including prognostic factors and treatment methods, were reviewed retrospectively. Data were collected to calculate overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Results: The majority of tumors 84.4% were within Kadish C stage, 79.7% were within T3 or T4, and 64.0% were within Hyams grade III or IV. A total of 50 (78.1%) patients received surgery and combined radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy, 10 (15.6%) received surgery with or without chemotherapy alone, and 4 (6.3%) received radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy alone. The majority of patients (79.7%) underwent endoscopic resection (endoscopic and endoscopically assisted). Surgery combined with radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy resulted in significantly better OS (84.4 vs. 50.6%, 84.4 vs. 37.5%) compared to surgery alone and radiotherapy alone (P = 0.0064). Endoscopic surgery group (endoscopic and endoscopically assisted) resulted in significantly better 5-year PFS (61.7 vs. 22.2%) compared to the open surgery group (P < 0.001). Although endoscopic surgery group was not a statistically significant predictor of 5-year OS (P = 0.54), the 5-year OS was 79.3% for the endoscopic surgery group and 76.2% for the open surgery group. A Cox regression analysis identified intracranial extension and surgery combined with radiotherapy as independent factors affecting 5-year OS while cervical lymph node metastasis and Hyams grade IV as independent factors affecting 5-year PFS. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that surgery combined with radiotherapy is the best treatment approach for ENB. For advanced tumors, endoscopic surgery is an effective treatment, and its survival rate is equal to or better than open surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Zeng
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yifu Tian
- Department of Pathology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yihong He
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Qiongxuan Xie
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Ludi Ou
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Min Wang
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Wen Chen
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Rui Wei
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Franzese C, Fogliata A, Loi M, Badalamenti M, Franceschini D, Comito T, Cozzi L, Reggiori G, Tomatis S, Scorsetti M. Dosimetric impact of volumetric modulated arc therapy for nasopharyngeal cancer treatment. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 26:101-110. [PMID: 34046220 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2021.0017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Background The purpose of the study was to evaluate the toxicity and outcome of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated using 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique. Materials and methods 68 patients treated between 2006 and 2018 were retrospectively analysed. Since 2009 patients received 3DCRT with 50/70 Gy to the elective/boost volumes in 35 fractions; from then, VMAT with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) with 54.45/69.96 Gy in 33, or 54/66 Gy in 30 fractions. Induction chemotherapy was administered in 74% of the patients, concomitant cisplatinum in 87%. Acute and late toxicity data, progression-free survival PSF and overall survival OS, and toxicity correlations with dose metrics were reported. Results With a median follow-up of 64 months, complete remission at the last evaluation was in 68% of the patients, while 28% and 9% had locoregional relapse and distant disease, respectively. The 5- and 10-year progression free survival (PFS) rates were 62.7 ± 6.5% and 53.2 ± 8.7%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year OS rates were 78.9 ± 5.5% and 61.4 ± 9.2%, respectively. At the multivariate Cox analysis TNM stage (p = 0.02) and concomitant chemotherapy (p = 0.01) resulted significant for PFS, concomitant chemotherapy (p = 0.04) for OS.Improvements in acute toxicity were presented for VMAT patients due to its ability to spare OARs. Odds ratio (OR) for acute salivary toxicity, between VMAT and 3DCRT, was 4.67 (p = 0.02). Dosimetrically, salivary toxicity correlated with mean parotid dose (p = 0.05), dysphagia with laryngeal (p = 0.04) and mean oral cavity (p = 0.06) doses, when dose-volume histograms (DVHs) are corrected for fractionation. Conclusion This study is a proof of a significant benefit of the VMAT technique compared with 3DCRT in terms of side effects in nasopharynx patients, and adds dosimetric correlations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ciro Franzese
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital IRCCS, Radiotherapy Dept, Milan-Rozzano, Italy.,Humanitas University, Biomedical Science Dept, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Antonella Fogliata
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital IRCCS, Radiotherapy Dept, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Mauro Loi
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital IRCCS, Radiotherapy Dept, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Marco Badalamenti
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital IRCCS, Radiotherapy Dept, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Davide Franceschini
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital IRCCS, Radiotherapy Dept, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Tiziana Comito
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital IRCCS, Radiotherapy Dept, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Luca Cozzi
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital IRCCS, Radiotherapy Dept, Milan-Rozzano, Italy.,Humanitas University, Biomedical Science Dept, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Giacomo Reggiori
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital IRCCS, Radiotherapy Dept, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Stefano Tomatis
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital IRCCS, Radiotherapy Dept, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital IRCCS, Radiotherapy Dept, Milan-Rozzano, Italy.,Humanitas University, Biomedical Science Dept, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Vision loss following high-dose proton-based radiotherapy for skull-base chordoma and chondrosarcoma. Radiother Oncol 2021; 158:125-130. [PMID: 33610625 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Revised: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & PURPOSE Dose escalation for skull-based chordoma and chondrosarcoma can put critical adjacent structures at risk, specifically the anterior optic pathway. We report the incidence of vision loss following high-dose conformal proton-based radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We reviewed patients with skull-base chordoma or chondrosarcoma treated with proton-based therapy between 2007 and 2018. We analyzed 148 patients and 283 individual eyes with functional vision at baseline who received a minimum 30GyRBE to 0.1 cm3 of the anterior optic pathway. Eyes were classified as "functionally blind" if visual acuity was 20/200 or worse. Kaplan-Meier and normal tissue complication probability modeling were used to establish the relationship between radiation dose and risk of functional vision loss. RESULTS At last follow-up, 110 of 148 patients were alive with no evidence of disease progression. With a median follow-up of 4.1 years (range, 0.5-12.8), 5 eyes in 3 patients developed functional blindness, with 2 patients developing bilateral blindness. Median time to blindness was 15.2 months. The 5-year incidence of vision loss was 2.1% (95% CI: 0.9-4.9%). On univariate analysis, development of blindness was associated with presence of multiple medical comorbidities (p = 0.0040). While there were no events with a maximum dose < 60GyRBE delivered to the anterior optic pathway, the crude rate was 3.6% over 60GyRBE, with all events occurring between 60-65GyRBE. CONCLUSIONS Despite the high radiotherapy dose delivered to patients with skull-base chordoma and chondrosarcoma, the rate of vision loss is low and no events occurred in those who received a maximum dose under 60GyRBE.
Collapse
|
31
|
Zhang T, Xu M, Mi J, Yang H, Liu Z, Huang L, Hu K, Wang R. Loosening Neuro-Optic Structures Dosimetric Constraints Provides High 5-Year Local Recurrence-Free Survival With Acceptable Toxicity in T4 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients Treated With Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2021; 11:598320. [PMID: 33692949 PMCID: PMC7937960 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.598320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Whether the original dosimetric constraints of neuro-optic structures (NOS) are appropriate for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) remains controversial. The present study compared the survival rates and radiation-induced optic neuropathy (RION) occurrence between T4 NPC patients whose NOS were irradiated with a near maximum dose received by 2% of the volume (D2%) >55 Gy and ≤55 Gy. Moreover, the NOS dosimetric parameters and their correlation with RION occurrence were also evaluated. Methods In this retrospective study, 256 T4 NPC patients treated with IMRT between May 2009 and December 2013 were included. Patient characteristics, survival rates, dosimetric parameters, and RION incidence were compared between the D2% ≤55 Gy and D2% >55 Gy groups. Results The median follow-up durations were 87 and 83 months for patients in the D2% >55 Gy and D2% ≤55 Gy groups, respectively. The 5-year local recurrence-free survival rates were 92.0 and 84.0% in the D2% >55 Gy and D2% ≤55 Gy groups (P = 0.043), respectively. There was no significant difference in the 5-year overall survival (OS) between both groups (D2% >55 Gy, 81.6%; D2% ≤55 Gy, 79.4%; P = 0.586). No patients developed severe RION (Grades 3–5), and there was no significant difference (P = 0.958) in the incidence of RION between the two groups. The maximum dose of NOS significantly affected the RION incidence, with a cutoff point of 70.77 Gy. Conclusion Appropriately loosening NOS dosimetric constraints in order to ensure a more sufficient dose to the target volume can provide a better 5-year local recurrence-free survival and acceptable neuro-optic toxicity in T4 NPC patients undergoing IMRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tingting Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Meng Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Jinglin Mi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Hui Yang
- Department of Oncology, Liuzhou Worker Hospital, Liuzhou, China
| | - Zhengchun Liu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, China
| | - Lulu Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Kai Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Rensheng Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Human Papillomavirus in Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 13:cancers13010045. [PMID: 33561073 PMCID: PMC7796014 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13010045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2020] [Revised: 12/19/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The causative role of human papillomavirus (HPV) in sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC) remains unclear and is hindered by small studies using variable HPV detection techniques. This meta-analysis aims to provide an updated overview of HPV prevalence in SNSCC stratified by detection method, anatomic subsite, and geographic region. From 60 eligible studies, an overall HPV prevalence was estimated at 26%. When stratified by detection method, HPV prevalence was lower when using multiple substrate testing compared to single substrate testing. Anatomic subsite HPV prevalence was higher in subsites with high exposure to secretion flow compared to low exposure subsites. HPV prevalence in SNSCC followed the global distribution of HPV+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Taken together, this meta-analysis further supports a role for HPV in a subset of SNSCCs. Abstract Human papillomavirus (HPV) drives tumorigenesis in a subset of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC) and is increasing in prevalence across the world. Mounting evidence suggests HPV is also involved in a subset of sinonasal squamous cell carcinomas (SNSCC), yet small sample sizes and variability of HPV detection techniques in existing literature hinder definitive conclusions. A systematic review was performed by searching literature through March 29th 2020 using PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection databases. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed by two authors independently. A meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model. Sixty studies (n = 1449) were eligible for statistical analysis estimating an overall HPV prevalence of 25.5% (95% CI 20.7–31.0). When stratified by HPV detection method, prevalence with multiple substrate testing (20.5%, 95% CI 14.5–28.2) was lower than with single substrate testing (31.7%, 95% CI 23.6–41.1), highest in high-exposure anatomic subsites (nasal cavity and ethmoids) (37.6%, 95% CI 26.5–50.2) vs. low-exposure (15.1%, 95% CI 7.3–28.6) and highest in high HPV+ OPSCC prevalence geographic regions (North America) (30.9%, 95% CI 21.9–41.5) vs. low (Africa) (13.1, 95% CI 6.5–24.5)). While small sample sizes and variability in data cloud firm conclusions, here, we provide a new reference point prevalence for HPV in SNSCC along with orthogonal data supporting a causative role for virally driven tumorigenesis, including that HPV is more commonly found in sinonasal subsites with increased exposure to refluxed oropharyngeal secretions and in geographic regions where HPV+ OPSCC is more prevalent.
Collapse
|
33
|
Lin YL. Proton beam therapy of periorbital sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma: Two case reports and review of literature. World J Clin Oncol 2020; 11:655-672. [PMID: 32879851 PMCID: PMC7443830 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i8.655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Revised: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sinonasal malignancies are rare but demanding due to complex anatomy, usually late diagnosis, and inconsistent therapy strategy based on multimodality approaches. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the most common histology, with poorer prognosis. In the setting of orbital invasion, an orbital exenteration may be required. However, in case of primary rejection of disfiguring surgery or unresectable disease, proton beam therapy (PBT) should be largely considered, allowing for better sparing of neighboring critical structures and improved outcomes by dose escalation. CASE SUMMARY A 62-year-old male presented with a recurrent SCC in the nasal septum abutting frontal skull base and bilateral orbits at 7 mo after primary partial nasal amputation. Because of refusal of face-deforming surgery and considerable adverse effects of conventional radiotherapy, the patient underwent a PBT by hyperfractionated accelerated scheme, resulting in complete response and moderate toxicities. After 2 years, a nasal reconstruction was implemented with satisfactory appearance and recurrence-freedom to date. Another patient with an initially extended sinonasal SCC, invading right orbit and facial soft tissue, declined an orbital exenteration and was treated with a normofractionated PBT to the gross tumor and elective cervical lymphatics. The follow-up showed a continuous tumor remission with reasonable late toxicities, such as cataract and telangiectasia on the right. Despite T4a stage and disapproval of concurrent chemotherapy owing to individual choice, both patients still achieved outstanding treatment outcomes with PBT alone. CONCLUSION PBT enabled orbit preservation and excellent tumor control without severe adverse effects on both presented patients with locally advanced sinonasal SCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Lan Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rinecker Proton Therapy Center, Munich 81371, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Teitelbaum JI, Issa K, Barak IR, Ackall FY, Jung SH, Jang DW, Abi Hachem R. Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Outcomes: Does Treatment at a High-Volume Center Confer Survival Benefit? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020; 163:986-991. [DOI: 10.1177/0194599820935395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Objective To determine whether treatment of sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) at a high-volume facility affects survival. Study Design Retrospective database analysis. Setting National Cancer Database (2004-2014). Subjects and Methods The National Cancer Database was queried for sinonasal SCC from 2004 to 2014. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics and classification, resection margins, treatment regimen, and facility case-specific volume—averaged per year and grouped in tertiles as low (0%-33%), medium (34%-66%), and high (67%-100%)—were compared. Overall survival was compared with Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results A total of 3835 patients treated for sinonasal SCC between 2004 and 2014 were identified. Therapeutic options included surgery alone (18.6%), radiotherapy (RT) alone (29.1%), definitive chemoradiation (15.4%), surgery with adjuvant RT (22.8%), and combinations (14.1%) of the aforementioned treatments. Patients who underwent surgery with adjuvant RT had better overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; P < .001; 95% CI, 0.63-0.86). As for treatment volume per facility, 7.4% of patients were treated at a low-volume center, 17.5% at a medium-volume center, and 75.1% at a high-volume center. Univariate analysis showed that treatment at a high-volume facility conferred a significantly better overall survival (HR, 0.77; P = .002). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, adjusting for age, sex, tumor classification, and treatment regimen, demonstrated that patients who underwent treatment at a high-volume facility (HR, 0.81; P < .001) had significantly improved survival. Conclusion This study shows a better overall survival for sinonasal SCC treated at high-volume centers. Further study may be needed to understand the effect of case volume on the paradigms of sinonasal SCC management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan I. Teitelbaum
- Division of Rhinology and Skull Base Surgery, Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Khalil Issa
- Division of Rhinology and Skull Base Surgery, Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ian R. Barak
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Feras Y. Ackall
- Division of Rhinology and Skull Base Surgery, Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sin-Ho Jung
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - David W. Jang
- Division of Rhinology and Skull Base Surgery, Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ralph Abi Hachem
- Division of Rhinology and Skull Base Surgery, Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Li G, Qiu B, Huang YX, Doyen J, Bondiau PY, Benezery K, Xia YF, Qian CN. Cost-effectiveness analysis of proton beam therapy for treatment decision making in paranasal sinus and nasal cavity cancers in China. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:599. [PMID: 32590957 PMCID: PMC7320568 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07083-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Cost-effectiveness is a pivotal consideration for clinical decision making of high-tech cancer treatment in developing countries. Intensity-modulated proton radiation therapy (IMPT, the advanced form of proton beam therapy) has been found to improve the prognosis of the patients with paranasal sinus and nasal cavity cancers compared with intensity-modulated photon-radiation therapy (IMRT). However, the cost-effectiveness of IMPT has not yet been fully evaluated. This study aimed at evaluating the cost-effectiveness of IMPT versus IMRT for treatment decision making of paranasal sinus and nasal cavity cancers in Chinese settings. Methods A 3-state Markov model was designed for cost-effectiveness analysis. A base case evaluation was performed on a patient of 47-year-old (median age of patients with paranasal sinus and nasal cavity cancers in China). Model robustness was examined by probabilistic sensitivity analysis, Markov cohort analysis and Tornado diagram. Cost-effective scenarios of IMPT were further identified by one-way sensitivity analyses and stratified analyses were performed for different age levels. The outcome measure of the model was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). A strategy was defined as cost-effective if the ICER was below the societal willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of China (30,828 US dollars ($) / quality-adjusted life year (QALY)). Results IMPT was identified as being cost-effective for the base case at the WTP of China, providing an extra 1.65 QALYs at an additional cost of $38,928.7 compared with IMRT, and had an ICER of $23,611.2 / QALY. Of note, cost-effective scenarios of IMPT only existed in the following independent conditions: probability of IMPT eradicating cancer ≥0.867; probability of IMRT eradicating cancer ≤0.764; or cost of IMPT ≤ $52,163.9. Stratified analyses for different age levels demonstrated that IMPT was more cost-effective in younger patients than older patients, and was cost-effective only in patients ≤56-year-old. Conclusions Despite initially regarded as bearing high treatment cost, IMPT could still be cost-effective for patients with paranasal sinus and nasal cavity cancers in China. The tumor control superiority of IMPT over IMRT and the patient’s age should be the principal considerations for clinical decision of prescribing this new irradiation technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guo Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510095, P. R. China
| | - Bo Qiu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, 651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, P. R. China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, P. R. China
| | - Yi-Xiang Huang
- Department of Health Management, Public Health Institute of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510000, P. R. China
| | - Jerome Doyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, 06189, Nice, France.,Mediterranean Institute of Proton Therapy, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, 06200, Nice, France
| | - Pierre-Yves Bondiau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, 06189, Nice, France.,Mediterranean Institute of Proton Therapy, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, 06200, Nice, France
| | - Karen Benezery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, 06189, Nice, France.,Mediterranean Institute of Proton Therapy, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, 06200, Nice, France
| | - Yun-Fei Xia
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, 651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, P. R. China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, P. R. China
| | - Chao-Nan Qian
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, 651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, P. R. China. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangzhou Concord Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510045, P. R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Elgart K, Faden DL. Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Etiology, Pathogenesis, and the Role of Human Papilloma Virus. CURRENT OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY REPORTS 2020; 8:111-119. [PMID: 32582473 PMCID: PMC7314379 DOI: 10.1007/s40136-020-00279-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC) is a rare disease with considerable histologic diversity. Currently, there is a poor understanding of the etiology and pathogenesis of SNSCC. Here, we review recent literature to summarize what is known regarding (1) the etiology of SNSCC, (2) the role of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) in SNSCC, and (2) the molecular underpinnings of SNSCC. RECENT FINDINGS 1. High risk HPVappears to play a role in the pathogenesis of a subset of SNSCCs. SNSCCs with high risk HPV have improved survival compared with those without HPV and occur in patients who are younger, similar to HPV mediated oropharyngeal cancer. 2. A subset of inverted papillomas have transcriptionally active low-risk HPV and have a higher risk of transformation, while low risk HPV negative inverted papillomas frequently have EGFR mutations. SUMMARY SNSCC is a diverse disease with likely multiple etiologies including carcinogen, irritant exposure, and HPV. While not definitively proven, evidence supports a role for high-risk HPV in a subset of SNSCC, and low-risk HPV in a subset of inverted papillomas which transform to SNSCC. In-depth molecular and genomic studies are needed in SNSCC to better understand the genomic underpinnings and oncogenic drivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katya Elgart
- Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Daniel L. Faden
- Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Harvard Medical School, 243 Charles St, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Wang Y, Yang R, Zhao M, Guo W, Zhang L, Zhang W, Wang X. Retrospective analysis of 98 cases of maxillary sinus squamous cell carcinoma and therapeutic exploration. World J Surg Oncol 2020; 18:90. [PMID: 32375789 PMCID: PMC7204045 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-01862-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2019] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maxillary sinus squamous cell carcinoma (MSSCC) is a relatively rare head and neck cancer with poorly defined prognosis, and the present study aimed to investigate the outcomes for MSSCC according to different treatments. METHODS Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital pathology database was reviewed from 2007 to 2017, and 98 patients with pathologically confirmed MSSCC were enrolled. Retrospective analysis and follow-up were performed for each patient. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors was performed using Cox's regression model. RESULTS For all the 98 cases of MSSCC, the 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 31.0% and 29.3%, respectively. Among 98 patient, 33 patients were treated with systemic treatment (NON-SUR), 19 patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy followed by surgery (CT/RT+SUR), 38 patients received surgery followed by chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (SUR+RT/CT), and 8 patients were performed surgery alone (SUR).The OS rate for each group was 27.3%, 57.9%, 30.6% and 37.5%, respectively, while the DFS was 21.2%, 36.8%, 31.6% and 25.0%, respectively. The OS rate of CT/RT+SUR was significantly higher than that of NON-SUR and SUR+CT/RT groups (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that smoking, low differentiation, and advanced T stage were independent risk factors for OS, while low differentiation and advanced N stage for DFS. CONCLUSIONS Surgery-based treatment is still the first-line therapeutic strategy for MSSCC. And neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery is highly recommended for MSSCC patients, especially those with advanced tumors or requesting high quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Wang
- Department of Maxillofacial and Otorhinolaryngology Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Cancer Institute, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Tianjin, 300060 China
| | - Rong Yang
- Department of Maxillofacial and Otorhinolaryngology Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Cancer Institute, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Tianjin, 300060 China
| | - Minghui Zhao
- Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory of Cancer Center, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 201620 China
| | - Wenyu Guo
- Department of Maxillofacial and Otorhinolaryngology Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Cancer Institute, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Tianjin, 300060 China
| | - Lun Zhang
- Department of Maxillofacial and Otorhinolaryngology Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Cancer Institute, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Tianjin, 300060 China
| | - Wenchao Zhang
- Department of Maxillofacial and Otorhinolaryngology Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Cancer Institute, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Tianjin, 300060 China
| | - Xudong Wang
- Department of Maxillofacial and Otorhinolaryngology Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Cancer Institute, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Tianjin, 300060 China
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Research progress on mechanism and dosimetry of brainstem injury induced by intensity-modulated radiotherapy, proton therapy, and heavy ion radiotherapy. Eur Radiol 2020; 30:5011-5020. [PMID: 32318844 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06843-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Revised: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) is an effective method for treating head and neck cancer (HNC). However, RT may cause side effects during and after treatment. Radiation-induced brainstem injury (BSI) is often neglected due to its low incidence and short survival time and because it is indistinguishable from intracranial tumor progression. It is currently believed that the possible mechanism of radiation-induced BSI includes increased expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and damage of vascular endothelial cells, neurons, and glial cells as well as an inflammatory response and oxidative stress. At present, it is still difficult to avoid BSI even with several advanced RT techniques. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is the most commonly used therapeutic technique in the field of RT. Compared with early conformal therapy, it has greatly reduced the injury to normal tissues. Proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) and heavy ion radiotherapy (HIT) have good dose distribution due to the presence of a Bragg peak, which not only results in better control of the tumor but also minimizes the dose to the surrounding normal tissues. There are many clinical studies on BSI caused by IMRT, PBT, and HIT. In this paper, we review the mechanism, dosimetry, and other aspects of BSI caused by IMRT, PBT, and HIT.Key Points• Enhanced MRI imaging can better detect radiation-induced BSI early.• This article summarized the dose constraints of brainstem toxicity in clinical studies using different techniques including IMRT, PBT, and HIT and recommended better dose constraints pattern to clinicians.• The latest pathological mechanism of radiation-induced BSI and the corresponding advanced treatment methods will be discussed.
Collapse
|
39
|
Fan M, Kang JJ, Lee A, Fan D, Wang H, Kitpanit S, Fox P, Sine K, Mah D, McBride SM, Tsai CJ, Riaz N, Dunn LA, Sherman EJ, Michel L, Singh B, Ganly I, Wong RJ, Boyle JO, Cohen MA, Lee NY. Outcomes and toxicities of definitive radiotherapy and reirradiation using 3-dimensional conformal or intensity-modulated (pencil beam) proton therapy for patients with nasal cavity and paranasal sinus malignancies. Cancer 2020; 126:1905-1916. [PMID: 32097507 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Revised: 01/12/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton therapy (PT) improves outcomes in patients with nasal cavity (NC) and paranasal sinus (PNS) cancers. Herein, the authors have reported to their knowledge the largest series to date using intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) in the treatment of these patients. METHODS Between 2013 and 2018, a total of 86 consecutive patients (68 of whom were radiation-naive and 18 of whom were reirradiated) received PT to median doses of 70 grays and 67 grays relative biological effectiveness, respectively. Approximately 53% received IMPT. RESULTS The median follow-up was 23.4 months (range, 1.7-69.3 months) for all patients and 28.1 months (range, 2.3-69.3 months) for surviving patients. The 2-year local control (LC), distant control, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates were 83%, 84%, 74%, and 81%, respectively, for radiation-naive patients and 77%, 80%, 54%, and 66%, respectively for reirradiated patients. Among radiation-naive patients, when compared with 3-dimensional conformal proton technique, IMPT significantly improved LC (91% vs 72%; P < .01) and independently predicted LC (hazard ratio, 0.14; P = .01). Sixteen radiation-naive patients (24%) experienced acute grade 3 toxicities; 4 (6%) experienced late grade 3 toxicities (osteoradionecrosis, vision loss, soft-tissue necrosis, and soft tissue fibrosis) (grading was performed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 5.0]). Slightly inferior LC was noted for patients undergoing reirradiation with higher complications: 11% experienced late grade 3 toxicities (facial pain and brain necrosis). Patients treated with reirradiation had more grade 1 to 2 radionecrosis than radiation-naive patients (brain: 33% vs 7% and osteoradionecrosis: 17% vs 3%). CONCLUSIONS PT achieved remarkable LC for patients with nasal cavity and paranasal sinus cancers with lower grade 3 toxicities relative to historical reports. IMPT has the potential to improve the therapeutic ratio in these malignancies and is worthy of further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Fan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Jung Julie Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Anna Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Dan Fan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Huili Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sarin Kitpanit
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Pamela Fox
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, New Jersey
| | - Kevin Sine
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, New Jersey
| | - Dennis Mah
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, New Jersey
| | - Sean M McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Chiaojung Jillian Tsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nadeem Riaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lara A Dunn
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Eric J Sherman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Loren Michel
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Bhuvanesh Singh
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ian Ganly
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Richard J Wong
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jay O Boyle
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Marc A Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Iwami K, Fujii M, Nishio N, Maruo T, Fujimoto Y, Takanari K, Kamei Y, Yamada M, Ogawa T, Osuka K, Saito K. Skull Base Invasion Patterns of Malignant Head and Neck Tumors: A Neurosurgical Perspective. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2020; 82:e120-e130. [PMID: 34306927 DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3402034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2019] [Accepted: 11/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Craniofacial resection (CFR) and temporal bone resection (TBR) on malignant head and neck tumors (MHNTs) invading skull base require accurate and precise determination of the tumor invasion. We investigated tumor skull base invasion patterns and surgical results in CFR and TBR cases. Methods We performed either CFR or TBR for 75 selected patients with the possibility of en bloc resection over the period between 2011 and 2018. The medical charts of the selected patients were reviewed. Results Primary tumor onset site (TOS) groups were: (1) nasal cavity/ethmoid sinus, 20 cases; (2) orbit, 10 cases; (3) maxillary sinus, 28 cases; and (4) external ear/temporomandibular joint, 17 cases. Grades for tumor invasion depth (TID) included: (I) extracranial invasion and skull base bone invasion; (II) extradural invasion; or (III) intradural invasion. Patients in groups 1 and 2 had a significantly higher frequency of grade II and III invasions than patients in groups 3 and 4. The main invasion site was nasal cavity superior wall and ethmoid sinus superior wall for group 1 tumors, orbit superior wall, and lateral skull base sphenoid bone for group 2 and 3 tumors, and lateral skull base temporal bone for group 4 tumors. Positive resection margins represented a significant negative prognostic factor. TID and TOS did not affect skull base margin status. Conclusion Skull base invasion of MHNTs exhibits certain fixed patterns in sites susceptible to invasion based on the TOS. The frequencies of extradural and intradural invasions differed, indicating the importance for accurate preoperative tumor evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenichiro Iwami
- Department of Neurosurgery, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Masazumi Fujii
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Naoki Nishio
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Takashi Maruo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yasushi Fujimoto
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Keisuke Takanari
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yuzuru Kamei
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Masayuki Yamada
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Ogawa
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Koji Osuka
- Department of Neurosurgery, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Saito
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Hagiwara Y, Koto M, Bhattacharyya T, Hayashi K, Ikawa H, Nemoto K, Tsuji H. Long-term outcomes and toxicities of carbon-ion radiotherapy in malignant tumors of the sphenoid sinus. Head Neck 2020; 42:50-58. [PMID: 31584731 PMCID: PMC6973156 DOI: 10.1002/hed.25965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2019] [Revised: 07/31/2019] [Accepted: 09/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most of the primary sphenoid sinus tumors present with locally advanced stages with involvement of adjacent critical structures and are not amenable to radical resection. We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of carbon-ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) for sphenoid sinus malignancies. METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of 22 patients of primary sphenoid carcinomas treated with definitive C-ion RT. RESULTS Adenoid cystic carcinoma was the most common histology (15 patients, 68.2%). The median follow-up of this cohort was 48.5 months. The actuarial local control and overall survival at 5 years were 51.0% and 62.7%, respectively. Grade 4 visual impairment and grade 4 brain necrosis were seen in six and one patient, respectively. CONCLUSION C-ion RT can provide a reasonably good clinical outcome in locally advanced sphenoid sinus malignancies with a marginally higher late toxicity profile because of extremely close proximity of the target volume to critical structures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuhito Hagiwara
- Hospital of the National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and Technology, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Masashi Koto
- Hospital of the National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tapesh Bhattacharyya
- Hospital of the National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Hayashi
- Hospital of the National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Ikawa
- Hospital of the National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kenji Nemoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Tsuji
- Hospital of the National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
The value of preoperative radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced nasal cavity and paranasal sinus squamous cell carcinoma: A single institutional experience. Oral Oncol 2019; 101:104512. [PMID: 31869689 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.104512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2019] [Revised: 11/28/2019] [Accepted: 12/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to explore the value of preoperative radiotherapy in the comprehensive treatment of locally advanced nasal cavity and paranasal sinus squamous cell carcinomas (LA-NPSCCs). MATERIALS This retrospective study included 140 patients with stage III-IVB NPSCCs treated with pre-/postoperative radiotherapy plus surgery. The complete resection rate, pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, and orbital content retention rate were calculated. The overall survival (OS), local control (LC), distance metastasis free survival (DMFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between treatment groups were evaluated. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 92.3 months, the 5-year OS, LC, DMFS, and DFS of entire cohort were 62.0%, 65.5%, 85.4%, and 57.8%, respectively. The preoperative radiotherapy group achieved similar LC, DFS, DMFS, and OS rates compared to postoperative radiotherapy group, despite higher rates of stage IV and orbital content/apex invasion. The preoperative radiotherapy resulted in significantly improved complete resection rate (93.3% vs 38.0%, p < 0.001). In the preoperative radiotherapy group, one third of patients achieved pathologic complete response. The pCR subgroup achieved statistically higher 5-year OS, LC, DFS (p < 0.05), but similar 5-year DMFS (p > 0.05) compared to non-pCR subgroup. The actual orbital content retention rate in preoperative radiotherapy group was 85.7%, superior to 58.3% in postoperative radiotherapy group (p = 0.049). CONCLUSION On the basis of multimodality therapy becoming standard paradigm for LA-NPSCCs, preoperative radiotherapy significantly improved complete resection rate and orbital content retention rate. Therefore, preoperative radiotherapy followed by surgery might be desirable for LA-NPSCCs, especially for those with organ preservation intention.
Collapse
|
43
|
Li R, Tian S, Zhu Y, Zhu W, Wang S. Management of orbital invasion in sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma: 15 years' experience. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2019; 10:243-255. [PMID: 31756058 DOI: 10.1002/alr.22465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2019] [Revised: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 10/01/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study was intended to review our management strategy for sinonasal squamous cell carcinomas (SNSCCs) with orbital invasion and to explore the role of radiotherapy in orbital preservation. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 93 SNSCC patients with orbital invasion who underwent radiotherapy with or without surgery over the past 15 years. The degree of orbital invasion was classified into 3 grades. RESULTS Eighty-eight patients presented with T4 tumors and 36 had grade III orbital invasion. Seventy-two patients received surgery plus radiation and 67 received platinum-based chemotherapy. The median follow-up for surviving patients was 60 months. Five-year overall survival (OS) for the whole group was 57.4%. The patients treated with surgery plus radiation had a 5-year survival rate of 62.2% and orbital preservation was feasible in 90.3% of cases. Twenty-one patients with SNSCCs that extended into the extraocular muscles or eye globe also underwent orbital preservation. Five-year locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS) was 69.5% for patients treated with orbital preservation and 57.1% for those treated with orbital exenteration, indicating no statistical difference. Five-year survival, 5-year progression-free survival (PFS), and 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were similar between groups. Grade III orbital invasion was independently associated with shorter OS, LRFS, PFS, and DMFS. CONCLUSION Orbital invasion in grade III was associated with the worst survival outcomes. Invasion of either the extraocular muscles or eye globe is not a contraindication for eye-sparing surgery. Preoperative chemoradiation continues to offer hope to patients with a strong desire to preserve their eyes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruichen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shu Tian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yi Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenjia Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shengzi Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Sugiyama S, Katsui K, Tominaga Y, Waki T, Katayama N, Matsuzaki H, Kariya S, Kuroda M, Nishizaki K, Kanazawa S. Dose distribution of intensity-modulated proton therapy with and without a multi-leaf collimator for the treatment of maxillary sinus cancer: a comparative effectiveness study. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:209. [PMID: 31752928 PMCID: PMC6873663 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1405-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2019] [Accepted: 10/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Severe complications, such as eye damage and dysfunciton of salivary glands, have been reported after radiotherapy among patients with head and neck cancer. Complications such as visual impairment have also been reported after proton therapy with pencil beam scanning (PBS). In the case of PBS, collimation can sharpen the penumbra towards surrounding normal tissue in the low energy region of the proton beam. In the current study, we examined how much the dose to the normal tissue was reduced by when intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) was performed using a multi-leaf collimator (MLC) for patients with maxillary sinus cancer. METHODS Computed tomography findings of 26 consecutive patients who received photon therapy at Okayama University Hospital were used in this study. We compared D2% of the region of interest (ROI; ROI-D2%) and the mean dose of ROI (ROI-mean) with and without the use of an MLC. The organs at risk (OARs) were the posterior retina, lacrimal gland, eyeball, and parotid gland. IMPT was performed for all patients. The spot size was approximately 5-6 mm at the isocenter. The collimator margin was calculated by enlarging the maximum outline of the target from the beam's eye view and setting the margin to 6 mm. All plans were optimized with the same parameters. RESULTS The mean of ROI-D2% for the ipsilateral optic nerve was significantly reduced by 0.48 Gy, and the mean of ROI-mean for the ipsilateral optic nerve was significantly reduced by 1.04 Gy. The mean of ROI-mean to the optic chiasm was significantly reduced by 0.70 Gy. The dose to most OARs and the planning at risk volumes were also reduced. CONCLUSIONS Compared with the plan involving IMPT without an MLC, in the dose plan involving IMPT using an MLC for maxillary sinus cancer, the dose to the optic nerve and optic chiasm were significantly reduced, as measured by the ROI-D2% and the ROI-mean. These findings demonstrate that the use of an MLC during IMPT for maxillary sinus cancer may be useful for preserving vision and preventing complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soichi Sugiyama
- Departments of Radiology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
- Department of Radiology, Tsuyama Chuo Hospital, Tusyama, Okayama, 708-0841, Japan
| | - Kuniaki Katsui
- Departments of Proton Beam Therapy, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
| | - Yuki Tominaga
- Department of Radiation Technology, Tsuyama Chuo Hospital, Tusyama, Okayama, 708-0841, Japan
| | - Takahiro Waki
- Department of Radiology, Tsuyama Chuo Hospital, Tusyama, Okayama, 708-0841, Japan
| | - Norihisa Katayama
- Departments of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Hidenobu Matsuzaki
- Departments of Oral Diagnosis and Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Shin Kariya
- Departments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Masahiro Kuroda
- Department of Radiological Technology, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Kazunori Nishizaki
- Departments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Susumu Kanazawa
- Departments of Radiology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Mohamed Ali A, Mathis T, Bensadoun RJ, Thariat J. Radiation induced optic neuropathy: Does treatment modality influence the risk? Bull Cancer 2019; 106:1160-1176. [PMID: 31757405 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2019.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2019] [Revised: 06/29/2019] [Accepted: 09/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Radiation induced optic neuropathy (RION) is a rare but disastrous complication of radiation therapy in treatment of periorbital tumors. The objective of this study is to investigate the incidence of RION in series of patients treated from peri orbital tumors by recent photon and proton irradiation modalities. We searched the Pub Med database for studies in periorbital tumors including base of skull, sinonasal, pituitary, nasopharyngeal tumors and craniopharyngioma treated with Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and with proton beam therapy (PBT) between 1992 and 2017 excluding metastatic tumors, lymphomas, pediatric series, those treated mainly with chemotherapy, target therapy and those written in languages other than English and French. The result retrieved 421 articles that were revised by the panel. Fourteen articles with IMRT and 27 with PBT reported usable data for the review from which 31studies that had pointed to the doses to the optic nerve (ON) and/or optic chiasm (OC) and incidence of RION have been analyzed. We have found that the incidence of RION had been reported fairly in both modalities and many other factors related to the patient, tumor, and irradiation process interplay in its development. We have concluded that proper treatment planning, good selection of treatment modality, adherence to dose constraints applied to critical structures all along with regular oncological and ophthalmological follow up, control of co-morbidities and early intervention, could help reducing its magnitude.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Mohamed Ali
- Sohag University, Sohag University Hospital, Department of Clinical Oncology, Sohag East, 82524 Sohag, Egypt
| | - Thibaud Mathis
- Croix-Rousse University Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, 103, grande rue de la Croix-Rousse, Lyon, France; UMR-CNRS 5510, Mateis, Villeurbanne, Lyon, France
| | | | - Juliette Thariat
- Centre François-Baclesse/ARCHADE, Department of Radiation Oncology, 3, avenue General Harris, 14000 Caen, France; Unicaen - Normandie Université, laboratoire de physique corpusculaire IN2P3/ENSICAEN - UMR6534, boulevard du Marechal Juin, 14050 Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Iwami K, Fujii M, Kishida Y, Jinguji S, Yamada M, Bakhit M, Nishio N, Fujimoto Y, Ogawa T, Takanari K, Kamei Y, Saito K. Role of transcranial sphenoidotomy in skull base surgery: classification of surgical techniques based on the surgical anatomy of the sphenoid sinus. J Neurosurg 2019; 131:1658-1667. [PMID: 30497162 DOI: 10.3171/2018.6.jns181013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2018] [Accepted: 06/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Although sphenoidotomy is more commonly performed via the transnasal approach than via the transcranial approach, transcranial sphenoidotomy (TCS) remains indispensable for en bloc resection of locally advanced sinonasal malignant tumors (SNMTs) extending to the skull base. TCS also enables transsphenoidal transposition of the temporoparietal galeal flap (TPGF) to compensate for the lack of vascularized reconstructive tissue after endoscopic transnasal skull base surgery. The objective of this study was to review the authors' surgical experience using TCS with an emphasis on the surgical anatomy of the sphenoid sinus and on the purpose of TCS. Relevant anatomy is further illustrated through cadaveric dissection and photo documentation. METHODS The authors reviewed the records of 50 patients who underwent TCS at the Nagoya University Hospital, Fukushima Medical University Hospital, or Aichi Medical University Hospital over the course of 7 years (between January 2011 and November 2017). The authors also performed cadaveric dissection in 2 adult cadaveric skull base specimens. RESULTS Of the 50 patients included in this study, 44 underwent craniofacial resection (CFR) for en bloc resection of SNMTs involving the anterior and/or lateral skull base, and 6 underwent transsphenoidal transposition of the TPGF flap. The authors categorized the TCS procedures according to the portion of the sphenoid sinus wall involved (i.e., superior, lateral, and superolateral). Superior sphenoidotomy was used in patients requiring anterior CFR. Lateral sphenoidotomy was further divided into 2 subtypes, with type 1 procedures performed for the transsphenoidal transpositioning of the TPGF, and type 2 procedures used in patients requiring lateral CFR. Superolateral sphenoidotomy was used in anterolateral CFR. CONCLUSIONS TCS still represents a useful tool in the armamentarium of neurosurgeons treating central skull base lesions. The newly proposed surgical classification facilitates a profound understanding of TCS and how to incorporate this technique into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenichiro Iwami
- Departments of1Neurosurgery and
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima; and
| | - Masazumi Fujii
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima; and
| | - Yugo Kishida
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital, Aichi
| | - Shinya Jinguji
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima; and
| | - Masayuki Yamada
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima; and
| | - Mudathir Bakhit
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima; and
| | | | | | | | - Keisuke Takanari
- 6Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yuzuru Kamei
- 6Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Saito
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima; and
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Tel A, Bagatto D, Tuniz F, Sembronio S, Costa F, D'Agostini S, Robiony M. The evolution of craniofacial resection: A new workflow for virtual planning in complex craniofacial procedures. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2019; 47:1475-1483. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2019] [Revised: 06/18/2019] [Accepted: 06/27/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
|
48
|
Ferella L, Cavallo A, Miceli R, Iacovelli NA, Giandini T, Pignoli E, Calareso G, Bossi P, Resteghini C, Gravina GL, Nicolai P, Castelnuovo P, Piazza C, Licitra L, Fallai C, Orlandi E. Prognostic role of primary tumor, nodal neck, and retropharyngeal GTVs for unresectable sinonasal cancers treated with IMRT and chemotherapy. TUMORI JOURNAL 2019; 106:39-46. [DOI: 10.1177/0300891619868006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background: We evaluated the prognostic role of gross tumor volumes (GTVs) of primary tumor and positive lymph nodes on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in locally advanced unresectable sinonasal cancer (SNC) treated with definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with or without chemotherapy. Methods: Primary tumor GTV (GTV-T), pathologic neck nodes GTV (GTV-N), and positive retropharyngeal nodes GTV (GTV-RPN) of 34 patients with epithelial nonglandular SNC receiving IMRT with or without chemotherapy were retrospectively measured. The GTV variables were analyzed in relation with OS and PFS. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. We also estimated the crude cumulative incidence of locoregional relapses only. The optimal volume cutoff value was determined using an outcome-oriented method among the observed values. Results: GTV-T was significantly associated with decreased OS ( P=0.003) and PFS ( P=0.003). Moreover, patients with disease total volumes (GTV) smaller than 149.44 cm³ had better OS and PFS than patients with higher volumes ( P<0.0001 for both). Neck nodal metastasis impacted on OS and PFS ( P=0.030 and P=0.033, respectively), but GTV-N did not ( P=0.961; P=0.958). Retropharyngeal nodes metastasis was not associated with prognosis (OS: P=0.400; PFS: P=0.104). When GTV-RPN was added to GTV-N (GTV-TN), a relation with PFS ( P=0.041) and a trend toward significance for OS ( P=0.075) were found. Conclusions: Our results show that tumor volume is a powerful predictor of outcome in SNC. This could be useful to identify patients with worse prognosis deserving different treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Letizia Ferella
- Unit of Radiotherapy 2, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Cavallo
- Unit of Medical Physics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Rosalba Miceli
- Clinical Epidemiology and Trials Organization Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Tommaso Giandini
- Unit of Medical Physics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuele Pignoli
- Unit of Medical Physics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppina Calareso
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Bossi
- Unit of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Resteghini
- Unit of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Luca Gravina
- Division of Radiotherapy, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Piero Nicolai
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Paolo Castelnuovo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Insubria and ASST Sette Laghi, Ospedale di Circolo, Varese, Italy
| | - Cesare Piazza
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Lisa Licitra
- Unit of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Fallai
- Unit of Radiotherapy 2, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Ester Orlandi
- Unit of Radiotherapy 2, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Unit of Radiotherapy 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Kountouri M, Pica A, Walser M, Albertini F, Bolsi A, Kliebsch U, Bachtiary B, Combescure C, Lomax AJ, Schneider R, Weber DC. Radiation-induced optic neuropathy after pencil beam scanning proton therapy for skull-base and head and neck tumours. Br J Radiol 2019; 93:20190028. [PMID: 31322969 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the radiation-induced optic neuropathy (RION) prevalence, following high dose pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PBSPT) to skull base and head and neck (H&N) tumours. METHODS Between 1999 and 2014, 216 adult patients, median age 47 years (range, 18-77), were treated with PBS PT for skull base or H&N malignancies, delivering ≥45 GyRBE to the optic nerve(s) (ON) and/or optic chiasma (OC). The median administered dose to the planning target volume was 74.0 GyRBE (range, 54.0-77.4). The median follow-up was 5.3 years (range, 0.8-15.9). RESULTS RION was observed in 14 (6.5%) patients at a median time of 13.2 months (range, 4.8-42.6) following PBSPT. Most (92.9%) of RION were symptomatic. Most affected patients (11/14; 79%) developed unilateral toxicity. Grade 4, 3, 2 and 1 toxicity was observed in 10, 2, 1 and 1 patients, respectively. On univariate analyses, age (<70 vs ≥70 years; p < 0.0001), hypertension (p = 0.0007) and tumour abutting the optic apparatus (p = 0.012) were associated with RION. OC's V60 GyRBE was of border line significance (p = 0.06). None of the other evaluated OC-ON dose/volume metrics (Dmax, Dmean, V40-60) were significantly associated with this complication. CONCLUSION These data suggest that high-dose PBS PT for skull base and H&N tumours is associated with a low prevalence of RION. Caution should be however exercised when treating elderly/hypertensive patients with tumours abutting the optic apparatus. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This is the first study reporting the risk of developing RION following proton therapy with PBS technique, demonstrating the safety of this treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melpomeni Kountouri
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, CH-5232, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Alessia Pica
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, CH-5232, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Marc Walser
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, CH-5232, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Francesca Albertini
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, CH-5232, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Alessandra Bolsi
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, CH-5232, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Ulrike Kliebsch
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, CH-5232, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Barbara Bachtiary
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, CH-5232, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Christophe Combescure
- Service d'Epidemiologie Clinique, Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève, CH 12011 Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Antony J Lomax
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, CH-5232, Villigen, Switzerland.,Department of Physics, ETH, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Ralf Schneider
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, CH-5232, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Damien Charles Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, CH-5232, Villigen, Switzerland.,University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Orlandi E, Cavalieri S, Granata R, Nicolai P, Castelnuovo P, Piazza C, Schreiber A, Turri-Zanoni M, Quattrone P, Miceli R, Infante G, Sessa F, Facco C, Calareso G, Iacovelli NA, Mattavelli D, Paderno A, Resteghini C, Locati LD, Licitra L, Bossi P. Locally advanced epithelial sinonasal tumors: The impact of multimodal approach. Laryngoscope 2019; 130:857-865. [PMID: 31369156 DOI: 10.1002/lary.28202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2019] [Revised: 06/04/2019] [Accepted: 07/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Outcomes of locally advanced epithelial sinonasal cancers remain unsatisfactory; moreover, only limited and heterogeneous data exist on prognostic factors. METHODS We reviewed all consecutive patients with American Joint Committee Cancer stage III to IV epithelial sinonasal cancers treated with platinum-based induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by locoregional treatment between 1996 and 2015. RESULTS We identified 69 patients treated with a multimodal approach (IC, surgery, radiotherapy). Overall, 44 patients recurred (64%). Of those, 19 patients received salvage surgery, but only four remained disease-free. Median overall survival (OS) was 62.5 months. Sinonasal neuroendocrine and small cell histotypes (P = 0.0085), neuroendocrine differentiation (P = 0.006), and lack of response to IC (P = 0.03) were associated with worse OS. In patients who recurred, median OS was 13 months since recurrence. Survival was longer in patients submitted to salvage surgery (44%) than in those receiving chemotherapy alone at recurrence (29.5 vs. 4.6 months). Patients with a clinical benefit after palliative chemotherapy had a longer median OS than those with disease progression (29.2 vs. 4.4 months; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Globally, the prognosis of locally advanced epithelial sinonasal cancers is dismal, with worse outcomes for neuroendocrine lesions. In the recurrent setting, feasibility of salvage surgery and clinical benefit from palliative chemotherapy are associated with longer OS. A multimodal treatment strategy with IC seems to offer improved OS when compared with other retrospective series not employing such a therapeutic tool. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4 Laryngoscope, 130:857-865, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ester Orlandi
- Radiation Oncology Department, The University of Milan, Milan
| | - Stefano Cavalieri
- the Head and Neck Medical Oncology Department, The University of Milan, Milan
| | - Roberta Granata
- the Head and Neck Medical Oncology Department, The University of Milan, Milan
| | - Piero Nicolai
- the Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Brescia, Brescia
| | - Paolo Castelnuovo
- the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Insubria and ASST Sette Laghi, Ospedale di Circolo, Varese, Italy
| | - Cesare Piazza
- the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Maxillofacial and Thyroid Surgery, The University of Milan, Milan
| | - Alberto Schreiber
- the Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Brescia, Brescia
| | - Mario Turri-Zanoni
- the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Insubria and ASST Sette Laghi, Ospedale di Circolo, Varese, Italy
| | - Pasquale Quattrone
- the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Milan, Milan
| | - Rosalba Miceli
- the Unit of Clinical Epidemiology and Trial Organization, The University of Milan, Milan
| | - Gabriele Infante
- the Unit of Clinical Epidemiology and Trial Organization, The University of Milan, Milan
| | - Fausto Sessa
- the Department of Pathology, University of Insubria and ASST Sette Laghi, Ospedale di Circolo, Varese, Italy
| | - Carla Facco
- the Department of Pathology, University of Insubria and ASST Sette Laghi, Ospedale di Circolo, Varese, Italy
| | | | | | - Davide Mattavelli
- the Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Brescia, Brescia
| | - Alberto Paderno
- the Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Brescia, Brescia
| | - Carlo Resteghini
- the Head and Neck Medical Oncology Department, The University of Milan, Milan
| | | | - Lisa Licitra
- the Head and Neck Medical Oncology Department, The University of Milan, Milan.,Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, the University of Milan, Milan
| | - Paolo Bossi
- the Head and Neck Medical Oncology Department, The University of Milan, Milan.,the University of Brescia, Brescia
| |
Collapse
|