Regional myocardial blood flow in patients with sick sinus syndrome randomized to long-term single chamber atrial or dual chamber pacing--effect of pacing mode and rate

A case of cardiogenic shock due to ventricular dyssynchrony resolved by atrial pacing

We present a case of a man with ischemic cardiomyopathy and single chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator who developed sinus arrest creating sudden dependence on right ventricular (RV) pacing. He presented with cardiogenic shock secondary to abrupt onset ventricular dyssynchrony from RV pacing, which required emergent stabilization and completely resolved with atrial pacing.

Learning objective

To establish a basic understanding of cardiogenic shock management. To reinforce the adverse effects associated with right ventricular pacing.

A Refractory Electrical Storm after Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Role of Temporary Ventricular Overdrive Pacing as a Bridge to ICD Implantation

An electrical storm (ES) is defined as the presence of at least three episodes of sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation within 24 h. This patient had a previously known arterial hypertension, type II diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease and has presented to the Emergency Department (ED) with symptoms of retrosternal chest pain lasting for several hours prior. The initial 12-lead electrocardiogram revealed ST segment elevation in the anterior leads (V1-V6). Emergent coronary angiography revealed an acute occlusion of the proximal left anterior descending artery (pLAD) and percutaneous coronary intervention was performed with successful implantation of one drug-eluting stent in the pLAD. On day 8 of hospitalization, the patient developed a refractory ES for which he received 50 DC shocks and did not respond to multiple lines of antiarrhythmic medications. Due to a failure of medical therapy, we decided to implant a temporary pacemaker and initiate ventricular overdrive pacing (VOP) that was successful in terminating ES. Following electrical stabilization, the patient underwent a successful ICD implantation. This case demonstrates that VOP can contribute to hemodynamic and electrical stabilization of a patient that suffers from refractory ES and this treatment modality might serve as a temporary bridge to ICD implantation.

The estimated glomerular filtration rate predicts pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy

Clinical predictors for pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) (e.g., a wide QRS duration and left bundle branch block at baseline) have been reported. However, factors involved in the development of PICM in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remain unknown. This study aimed to determine the risk factors for PICM in patients with preserved LVEF. The data of 113 patients (average age: 71.3 years; men: 54.9%) who had echocardiography before and after pacemaker implantation (PMI) among 465 patients undergoing dual-chamber PMI were retrospectively analyzed. Thirty-three patients were diagnosed with PICM (18.0/100 person-years; 95% CI 12.8-25.2). A univariate Cox regression analysis showed that an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≤ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (HR 3.47; 95% CI 1.48-8.16) and a past medical history of coronary artery disease (CAD) (HR 2.76; 95% CI 1.36-5.60) were significantly associated with the onset of PICM. After adjusting for clinical variables, an eGFR ≤ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (HR 2.62; 95% CI 1.09-6.29) and a medical history of CAD (HR 2.32; 95% CI 1.13-4.80) were independent risk factors for developing PICM. A medical history of CAD and low eGFR are independent risk factors for PICM in patients with preserved LVEF at baseline. These results could be helpful in predicting a decreased LVEF by ventricular pacing before PMI. Close follow-up by echocardiography is recommended to avoid a delay in upgrading to physiological pacing, such as cardiac resynchronization therapy or conduction system pacing.

Apical or Septal Right Ventricular Location in Patients Receiving Defibrillation Leads: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This study reviews the published data comparing the efficacy and safety of apical and septal right ventricle defibrillator lead positioning at 1-year follow-up. Systemic research on Medline (PubMed), ClinicalTrials.gov, and Embase was performed using the keywords "septal defibrillation," "apical defibrillation," "site defibrillation," and "defibrillation lead placement," including implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices. Comparisons between apical and septal position were performed regarding R-wave amplitude, pacing threshold at a pulse width of 0.5 ms, pacing and shock lead impedance, suboptimal lead performance, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, readmissions due to heart failure and mortality rates. A total of 5 studies comprising 1438 patients were included in the analysis. Mean age was 64.5 years, 76.9% were male, with a median LVEF of 27.8%, ischemic etiology in 51.1%, and a mean follow-up period of 26.5 months. The apical lead placement was performed in 743 patients and septal lead placement in 690 patients. Comparing the 2 placement sites, no significant differences were found regarding R-wave amplitude, lead impedance, suboptimal lead performance, LVEF, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, and mortality rate at 1-year follow-up. Pacing threshold values favored septal defibrillator lead placement (P = 0.003), as well as shock impedance (P = 0.009) and readmissions due to heart failure (P = 0.02). Among patients receiving a defibrillator lead, only pacing threshold, shock lead impedance, and readmission due to heart failure showed results favoring septal lead placement. Therefore, generally, the right ventricle lead placement does not appear to be of major importance.

Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of definition, prevalence, risk factors, and management

Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy is a potential complication of right ventricular pacing. Definition varies between studies and the optimal management approach is uncertain. We aimed to characterize definition, prevalence, risk factors, and treatment strategies of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PiCM). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that evaluated PiCM after pacemaker implantation identified through a literature search of PubMed and EMBASE up to March 2022. We collected data on the study definition of PiCM and calculated pooled prevalence across studies. Meta-analysis with random effects modeling was used to assess the association between potential risk factors and PiCM, reported as odds ratio with 95% confidence interval. Twenty-six studies (6 prospective studies) with a total of 57,993 patients (mean/median age range was 51-78 years; female 45%) were included in the final analysis. Fifteen unique definitions of PiCM were reported. The pooled prevalence of PiCM was 12% (95% confidence interval 11%-14%). In meta-analysis, risk factors included male sex, history of myocardial infarction, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, baseline left ventricular ejection fraction, native QRS duration, right ventricular pacing percentage, and paced QRS duration. Treatment strategies identified included biventricular cardiac resynchronization therapy (6 studies) and His-bundle pacing (3 studies). Definition of PiCM varied significantly between studies. More than 1 in 10 patients with chronic right ventricular pacing developed PiCM. Key risk factors included baseline left ventricular ejection fraction, native QRS duration, RV pacing percentage, and paced QRS duration. The optimal management strategy has yet to be defined. Further research is needed to define and treat this understated complication.

PrismatoidPatNet54: An Accurate ECG Signal Classification Model Using Prismatoid Pattern-Based Learning Architecture

Background and objective: Arrhythmia is a widely seen cardiologic ailment worldwide, and is diagnosed using electrocardiogram (ECG) signals. The ECG signals can be translated manually by human experts, but can also be scheduled to be carried out automatically by some agents. To easily diagnose arrhythmia, an intelligent assistant can be used. Machine learning-based automatic arrhythmia detection models have been proposed to create an intelligent assistant. Materials and Methods: In this work, we have used an ECG dataset. This dataset contains 1000 ECG signals with 17 categories. A new hand-modeled learning network is developed on this dataset, and this model uses a 3D shape (prismatoid) to create textural features. Moreover, a tunable Q wavelet transform with low oscillatory parameters and a statistical feature extractor has been applied to extract features at both low and high levels. The suggested prismatoid pattern and statistical feature extractor create features from 53 sub-bands. A neighborhood component analysis has been used to choose the most discriminative features. Two classifiers, k nearest neighbor (kNN) and support vector machine (SVM), were used to classify the selected top features with 10-fold cross-validation. Results: The calculated best accuracy rate of the proposed model is equal to 97.30% using the SVM classifier. Conclusion: The computed results clearly indicate the success of the proposed prismatoid pattern-based model.

Effects of cardiac pacemakers on left ventricular volumes and function assessed by 3D echocardiography, Doppler method, and global longitudinal strain

Background

Many previous studies reported the negative effects of right ventricular (RV) pacing on the left ventricular (LV) structure and ejection fraction. Studying pacing hemodynamics is essential to understand these detrimental effects. In this study, we tried to understand RV pacing effects on LV volumes and function using advanced tools like 3D echo and global longitudinal strain (GLS). This was a prospective study of 175 consecutive patients (LVEF>50%) presented permanent pacing. Of 175 patients, only 50 patients met study criteria, divided into two groups (single or dual pacing). LV volumes and function were assessed by full-volume 3D echocardiography and GLS before pacing, at 1-week and 6-month post-pacing. Cardiac output (COP) was calculated by pulsed wave Doppler method and 3D echo.

Results

Doppler method results were similar to 3D echo in calculating SV and COP. At 1-week post pacing, both groups showed a significant decrease in SV due to a drop in EDV while ESV did not change significantly. Despite the drop in SV, there was a significant increase in cardiac output (COP) due to achieving higher heart rates post-pacing. There was a significant drop in EF and GLS in both groups.

At 6 months, SV continued to decrease with a corresponding decrease in COP and LVEF. This drop in SV was due to a significant increase in ESV while EDV did not show a significant change at a 6-month follow-up. Also, the drop EF and GLS became more significant.

There were no significant differences between both groups regarding the changes in LV volumes (EDV, ESV, SV), LVEF or GLS throughout the study (pre-pacing, at 1-week and 6-months post pacing). However, dual-chamber pacing group provided higher heart rates and as a result higher COP than the single-chamber group.

Conclusions

RV pacing led to a significant drop in LV COP, ejection fraction (EF), and GLS over short- and long-term duration. Dual chamber pacing provided higher COP than a single chamber pacing. This was due to tracking the S. A node with pacing at higher heart rates not due to an increase in SV and preserving atrioventricular synchrony. Both Doppler method and 3D echo can be used to calculate SV and COP.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43044-021-00138-9.

A new algorithm for optimization of rate-adaptive pacing improves exercise tolerance in patients with HFpEF

AIM

To develop an algorithm for optimization of rate-adaptive pacing settings in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and permanent cardiac pacing.

METHODS

This is a prospective randomized controlled study. A total of 54 patients with HFpEF, permanent atrial fibrillation (AF), and VVIR pacing were randomized to an intervention group with optimization of rate-adaptation parameters by using cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and pacemaker stress echocardiography (PASE), and to a control group with conventional programming. CPET, 6-min walk test (6-mwt), echocardiography (echo), Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), and Minnesota questionnaire (MLHFQ) were performed at baseline and after 3 months. PASE was used to exclude exercise-induced ischemia and to determine safe upper sensor rate. Pacing parameters were corrected to achieve optimal heart rate increments of 3-6 bpm for 1 mL/min/kg of VO₂ (oxygen uptake).

RESULTS

After 3 months, the intervention group demonstrated significant improvement of VO₂ peak by 1.64 ± 1.6 mL/min/kg, anaerobic threshold by 1.33 ± 1.3 mL/min/kg, exercise time by 170 ± 98 s, 6-mwt distance by 75 ± 63 m (P < .0001 for all), DASI by 5.23 points (P = .009), MLHFQ-score (reduction by 9 points, P < .0001), and echo parameters (decrease in LA volume from 108 (84; 132) to 95 (85; 130) mL, P = .026; E/e' from 11.7 ± 3.2 to 10.4 ± 2.9, P = .025; systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP) from 44 ± 14 to 39 ± 12 mm Hg, P = .001) compared to the control group.

CONCLUSION

An algorithm incorporating CPET and PASE for optimal programming of rate-adaptation parameters is a valuable tool to improve exercise capacity in HFpEF patients with permanent AF and VVIR pacing who remain exercise intolerant after conventional programming.

Heart failure and right ventricular pacing - how to avoid the need for cardiac resynchronization therapy

INTRODUCTION

Heart failure (HF) is a common finding in patients with pacemakers implanted for bradycardia, with cross-sectional and longitudinal studies contributing to the growing consensus that right ventricular pacing can cause adverse cardiac remodeling and left ventricular systolic dysfunction increasing the risk of hospitalization and death. An unselected approach using cardiac resynchronization therapy from the time of first implant in patients with heart block has produced equivocal results. Contemporary research has therefore begun to focus on the stratification of patients' risk of pacemaker-associated impairment to permit focused, personalized management.

AREAS COVERED

The present review will describe the incidence and relevance of HF in the pacemaker population and discuss current management options for such patients.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

At present there are few contemporary data to guide the identification of patients with and at risk of pacemaker-associated cardiac remodeling and dysfunction. Emphasis must be placed on precise and personalized treatment approaches which currently remain under-investigated due to a number of challenges, for example, small sample sizes, limited clarity on programmed settings, and short follow-up periods.

Predictors of an adverse clinical outcome in patients with long-term right ventricular apical pacing

BACKGROUND

Right ventricular (RV) apical pacing can result in progressive left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and contribute to the development of heart failure (HF). This study aimed to predict the outcome after long-term RV apical pacing in patients with acquired atrioventricular (AV) block who required permanent pacing.

METHODS

We included 247 patients who underwent long-term (>90% ventricular pacing with atrioventricular synchrony for more than 1 year) RV apical pacing for acquired AV block. We excluded patients with a reduced LV systolic function [ejection fraction (EF) <50%]. The paced QRS duration, degree of the axis, clinical characteristics, laboratory findings, and echocardiographic parameters were recorded. We evaluated the mortality and hospitalization due to HF.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up duration was 6.9 years. Mortality and hospitalization due to HF occurred in 8.1% and 17%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, a wider paced QRS duration and less superior paced QRS axis at the time of the implantation were independent risk factors for adverse events. The patients with a paced QRS duration of ≥163ms and axis of ≥-65° had a 5.8 times higher risk for adverse events compared to those with a paced QRS duration of <163ms and axis of <-65°.

CONCLUSIONS

The paced QRS duration and axis could help us predict adverse clinical outcomes after permanent RV apical pacing in patients with high-degree AV block.

Evaluation of Long Term Effect of RV Apical Pacing on Global LV Function by Echocardiography

INTRODUCTION

We very often face pacemaker implanted patients during follow-up with shortness of breath and effort intolerance inspite of normal clinical parameters.

AIM

The aim of our study is to evaluate the cause of effort intolerance and probable cause of sub-clinical Congestive Cardiac Failure (CCF) in a case of long term Right Ventricular (RV) apical pacing on global Left Ventricular (LV) function non- invasively by echocardiography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied 54 patients (Male 42, Female 12) of complete heart block (CHB) with RV apical pacing (40 VVI and 14 DCP). Mean duration of pacing was 58+4 months. All patients underwent 24 hours Holter monitoring to determine the percentage of ventricular pacing beats. 2-D Echocardiography was done to assess the regional wall motion of abnormality and global LV ejection fraction by modified Simpson's rule. These methods were coupled with the Doppler derived Myocardial Performance Index (MPI), tissue Doppler imaging, and mechanical regional dyssynchrony with 3-D Echocardiography. Data were analysed from 54 RV- apical paced patients and compared with age and body surface area of 60 controlled subjects (Male 46, Female 14).

RESULTS

Evaluation of LV function in 54 patients demonstrated regional wall motion abnormality and Doppler study revealed both LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction compare with control subjects (regional wall motion abnormality 80±6% vs 30±3% with p-value<0.0001) which is proportional to the percentage of ventricular pacing beats (mean paced beat 78%). Global LVEF 50±4% vs 60±2% (p-valve <0.0001) and MPI 0.46 ±0.12 v/s 0.36±0.09 (p-value <0.0001).

CONCLUSION

RV-apical pacing induces iatrogenic electrical dyssynchrony which leads to remodeling of LV and produces mechanical dyssynchrony which is responsible for LV dysfunction. Alternate site of RV pacing and/or biventricular pacing should be done to maintain biventricular electrical synchrony which will preserve the LV function.

Honing in on optimal ventricular pacing sites: an argument for his bundle pacing

OPINION STATEMENT

Frequent ventricular pacing is often or completely unavoidable in patients with high-grade or complete heart block. Over time, patients with high-burden RV pacing are at risk for developing symptomatic cardiomyopathy due to pacing-induced ventricular dyssynchrony. Growing awareness of this concern has generated interest in alternative pacing sites like the septum and outflow tract, the thinking being that these sites will more closely mimic His-Purkinje-mediated ventricular activation. Numerous studies have met with mixed results likely due to the fact that-to quote Marvin Gaye-there ain't nothing like the real thing. Herein lies the advantage of His bundle pacing (HBP), as it is the only pacing modality capable of physiological ventricular activation. HBP has been demonstrated to be safe and reliable in various forms of AV block with minimal drawbacks, namely modestly higher pacing thresholds when compared with other RV sites. Additionally, HBP is a truly physiologic alternative to biventricular pacing to effect cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), a concept supported by small observational and prospective studies. In our view, His bundle pacing should be considered in nearly all patients requiring ventricular pacing.

Reduction in coronary microvascular resistance through cardiac resynchronization and its impact on chronic reverse remodelling of left ventricle in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy

AIMS

Left bundle branch block (LBBB) induces mechanical dyssynchrony, thereby compromising the coronary circulation in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy. We sought to examine the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on coronary flow dynamics and left ventricular (LV) function.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-two patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (New York Heart Association class, III or IV; LV ejection fraction, ≤35%; QRS duration, ≥130 ms) were enrolled. One week after implantation of the CRT device, coronary flow velocity and pressure in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) and left circumflex coronary artery (LCx) were measured invasively, before and after inducing hyperemia by adenosine triphosphate administration, with two programming modes: sequential atrial and biventricular pacing (BiV) and atrial pacing in patients with LBBB or sequential atrial and right ventricular pacing in patients with complete atrioventricular block (Control). We assessed hyperemic microvascular resistance (HMR, mean distal pressure divided by hyperemic average peak velocity) and the relationship between the change in HMR and mid-term LV reverse remodelling. Hyperemic microvascular resistance was lower during BiV than during Control (LAD: 1.76 ± 0.47 vs. 1.54 ± 0.45, P < 0.001; LCx: 1.92 ± 0.42 vs. 1.73 ± 0.31, P = 0.003). The CRT-induced change in HMR of the LCx correlated with the percentage change in LV ejection fraction (R = -0.598, P = 0.011) and LV end-systolic volume (R = 0.609, P = 0.010) before and 6 months after CRT.

CONCLUSION

Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves coronary flow circulation by reducing microvascular resistance, which might be associated with LV reverse remodelling.

The role of biventricular pacing in the prevention and therapy of pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy

Right ventricular (RV) pacing produces well-known long-term deleterious effects not only on already compromised, but also on the normal left ventricle (LV). The activation pattern mimicks that of left bundle branch block, with delayed activation of the LV free wall, and results in electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony. Long-term mandatory (100%) RV pacing, increases LV dimensions and decreases the ejection fraction. Many of these negative effects of pacing can be overcome by biventricular pacing. In this review, we describe the characteristics of pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy, its incidence, and the use of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) for its therapy and prevention. The gaps in the current organizational guidelines for using CRT in the treatment of bradycardia are identified, and goals for future research are discussed.

Evaluation of left ventricular longitudinal function and synchrony after dual chamber pacemaker implantation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To evaluate left ventricular (LV) longitudinal function and dyssynchrony mechanisms after dual chamber pacemaker implantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The speckle tracking imaging technique was used for quantification of global longitudinal function of the left ventricle and for dyssynchrony evaluation before pacemaker implantation and after 3-month follow-up. The study group consisted of 98 patients with conventional indications for dual chamber pacemaker implantation.

RESULTS

Speckle tracking echocardiographic methods and image postprocessing revealed impairment of global longitudinal strain and significant LV dyssynchrony derived from 12 basal and mid-septum segments usually untraceable with conventional echocardiographic methods. Despite good physical performance and ejection fraction, global longitudinal strain significantly decreased in all patients from -15.08±0.46 to -13.56±0.5 (P<0.05) as well as mitral annulus movement decreased from 11.57±2.41 to 8.46±1.74cm/s (P<0.001) and from 12.55±2.75 to 10.78±2.82mm (P<0.001). It was expected that patients with dual chamber pacemaker will develop inter- and intraventricular dyssynchrony, but our study showed that pacing lead position did not prevent from LV dysynchronisation and only changed the mechanism.

CONCLUSIONS

Global longitudinal strain and LV dyssynchrony assessment enables us to detect early signs of LV dysfunction. Mechanisms of dyssynchrony development will be useful for pacemaker programing choices in order to prevent further dyssynchronisation.

Effect of pacing mode and pacing site on torsional and strain parameters and on coronary flow

BACKGROUND

Right ventricular apical pacing may induce detrimental effects on left ventricular function and coronary flow. In this study, the effects of pacing site and mode on cardiac mechanics and coronary blood flow were evaluated.

METHODS

This prospective study included 25 patients who received dual-chamber pacemakers with the ventricular lead placed in the right ventricular apex and presented in sinus rhythm (SR) at their regularly scheduled visits at the pacemaker clinic. Patients underwent complete transthoracic echocardiographic examinations while in SR, followed by noninvasive Doppler assessment of coronary flow in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) and speckle-tracking echocardiography of short-axis planes in SR, atrial pacing (AAI-P), atrioventricular (dual-chamber) pacing (DDD-P), and ventricular pacing (VVI-P).

RESULTS

Rotation of the base was significantly decreased with VVI-P compared with AAI-P. Left ventricular twist decreased significantly with DDD-P compared with AAI-P. Circumferential strain of the base significantly decreased with DDD-P and VVI-P compared with SR. The velocity-time integral of diastolic flow in the LAD decreased significantly with DDD-P compared with SR (10.7 ± 2.2 vs 10.2 ± 2.2 vs 8.9 ± 1.6 vs 8.7 ± 2.6 cm in SR and with AAI-P, DDD-P, and VVI-P, respectively, P = .003). Basal rotation and time from onset of the QRS complex to peak basal rotation as a percentage of systole were independently associated with the velocity-time integral of diastolic flow in the LAD during SR and the three pacing modes.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute right ventricular apical pacing showed a detrimental effect on left ventricular twist and basal mechanics, with the latter being independently associated with decreased LAD diastolic flow velocity parameters.

Ventricular pacing on the prognosis of patients with pacemaker implantation

Excessive right ventricular apex pacing has significant adverse effects on the cardiac function and hence, it is necessary to clinically optimize pacing parameters and advocate suitable physiological pacing to safeguard the cardiac function after pacemaker implant. Minimizing ventricular pacing is an atrioventricular node priority function, to encourage ventricular self conduction and to reduce unnecessary right ventricular pacing. Minimized ventricular pacing reduces ventricular pacing by encouraging self atrioventricular conduction function and extending the AV interval. This study is a prospective cohort study to evaluate the changes of cardiac function in patients and serum amino-terminal natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) before and after pacing, and the risk of atrial fibrillation with different CUM% VP. The study has shown that the cardiac function will deteriorate with an increase in pacing rate.

The downside of right ventricular apical pacing

The right ventricular (RV) apex has been the standard pacing site since the development of implantable pacemaker technology. Although RV pacing was initially only utilized for the treatment of severe bradyarrhythmias usually due to complete heart block, today the indications for and implantation of RV pacing devices is dramatically larger. Recently, the adverse effects of chronic RV apical pacing have been described including an increased risk of heart failure and death. This review details the detrimental effects of RV apical pacing and their shared hemodynamic pathophysiology. In particular, the role of RV apical pacing induced ventricular dyssynchrony is highlighted with a specific focus on differential outcome based upon QRS morphology at implant.

Differential effect of biventricular and right ventricular DDD pacing on coronary flow reserve in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy

CRT and Coronary Flow Reserve.

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has become a mainstay in heart failure management. There are also indications that upgrading of existing pacemakers to CRT systems may be of benefit. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of biventricular (BiV), compared with right ventricular (RV), pacing, on coronary flow reserve (CFR), in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From our database of heart failure patients implanted with BiV pacemakers, 20 patients (10 responders and 10 non-responders to CRT) were randomly selected. Left anterior descending artery coronary flow reserve was measured invasively, under BiV and RV pacing, using intracoronary adenosine to induce hyperemia. In all the 20 patients, there was a significant difference in the pairwise comparison between CFR recorded during BiV and RV pacing (mean difference 0.15, 95% confidence interval 0.07-0.23, P = 0.001). When comparing responders to non-responders, there was a significant difference as to the effect of BiV, compared with RV, pacing on CFR: mean difference (BiV minus RV CFR) was 0.26 ± 0.06 (95% confidence interval 0.13-0.39; P = 0.002), while in non-responders the difference was 0.04 ± 0.03 (95% confidence interval -0.02 to 0.10; P = 0.168).

CONCLUSION

BiV pacing is overall associated to higher CFR, compared with RV DDD pacing. This difference is almost exclusively attributable to the beneficial effect of CRT on coronary flow reserve in CRT-responders. This effect may contribute to the beneficial action of resynchronization in the failing heart and can be viewed in the context of reports of the usefulness of upgrading RV pacemakers to CRT systems.

Right ventricular septal pacing: a comparative study of outflow tract and mid ventricular sites

BACKGROUND

Prolonged right ventricle (RV) apical pacing is associated with left ventricle (LV) dysfunction due to dysynchronous ventricular activation and contraction. Alternative RV pacing sites with a narrower QRS compared to RV pacing might reflect a more physiological and synchronous LV activation. The purpose of this study was to compare the QRS morphology, duration, and suitability of RV outflow tract (RVOT) septal and mid-RV septal pacing.

METHODS

Seventeen consecutive patients with indication for dual-chamber pacing were enrolled in the study. Two standard 58-cm active fixation leads were passed to the RV and positioned in the RVOT septum and mid-RV septum using a commercially available septal stylet (model 4140, St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA). QRS duration, morphology, and pacing parameters were compared at the two sites. The RV lead with less-satisfactory electrical parameters was withdrawn and deployed in the right atrium.

RESULTS

Successful positioning of the pacing leads at the RVOT septum and mid-RV septum was achieved in 15 patients (88.2%). There were no significant differences in the mean stimulation threshold, R-wave sensing, and lead impedance between the two sites. The QRS duration in the RVOT septum was 151 ± 14 ms and in the mid-RV septum 145 ± 13 ms (P = 0.150).

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective observational study shows that septal pacing can be reliably achieved both in the RVOT and mid-RV with active fixation leads using a specifically shaped stylet. There are no preferences in regard to acute lead performance or paced QRS duration with either position.

Long-term outcome of single-chamber atrial pacing compared with dual-chamber pacing in patients with sinus-node dysfunction and intact atrioventricular node conduction

PURPOSE

The optimal pacing mode with either single chamber atrial pacemaker (AAI or AAIR) or dual chamber pacemaker (DDD or DDDR) is still not clear in sinus-node dysfunction (SND) and intact atrioventricular (AV) conduction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who were implanted with permanent pacemaker using AAI(R) (n = 73) or DDD(R) (n = 113) were compared.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups, with a mean follow-up duration of 69 months. The incidence of death did not show statistical difference. However, the incidence of hospitalization for congestive heart failure (CHF) was significantly lower in the AAI(R) group (0%) than the DDD(R) group (8.8%, p = 0.03). Also, atrial fibrillation (AF) was found in 2.8% in the AAI(R) group, which was statistically different from 15.2% of patients in the DDD(R) group (p = 0.01). Four patients (5.5%) with AAI(R) developed AV block, and subsequently switched to DDD(R) pacing. The risk of AF was lower in the patients implanted with AAI(R) than those with DDD(R) [hazard ratio (HR), 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.72 to 0.97, p = 0.02].

CONCLUSION

In patients with SND and intact AV conduction, AAI(R) pacing can achieve a better clinical outcome in terms of occurrence of CHF and AF than DDD(R) pacing. These findings support AAI(R) pacing as the preferred pacing mode in patients with SND and intact AV conduction.

Long-term implications of cumulative right ventricular pacing among patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

BACKGROUND

Limited data regarding the effect of right ventricular pacing (RVP) on long-term survival following implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation are available.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of RVP on the long-term survival benefit of primary ICD therapy.

METHODS

Mortality data were obtained for all patients enrolled in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Trial-II (MADIT-II) during an extended follow-up period of 8 years. The cumulative percent RVP during the trial was categorized as low (≤ 50% [n = 369]) and high (>50% [n = 198]). The benefit of ICD versus non-ICD therapy (n = 490) was evaluated in the two pacing categories during the early (0-3 years) and late (4-8 years) phases of the extended follow-up period.

RESULTS

During the early phase of the extended follow-up period, ICD therapy was associated with similar benefits in the low-RVP and high-RVP subgroups (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.35 and 0.38, respectively, P <.001 for both). In contrast, during the late phase, the long-term survival benefit of the ICD was maintained among patients with low RVP (HR = 0.60, P <.001) and attenuated among those with the high RVP (HR = 0.89, P = .45). An increased risk for late mortality associated with high versus low RVP was evident only among patients without left bundle branch [LBBB] at enrollment (HR = 1.63, P = .002).

CONCLUSION

Among ICD recipients, high RVP is associated with a significant increase in the risk of long-term mortality and with attenuated device efficacy. The deleterious effects of RVP are pronounced mainly in non-LBBB patients, suggesting a possible role for combined cardiac resynchronization-defibrillator therapy in this population.

Spatial heterogeneity of protein expression induced by dyssynchronous right ventricular pacing in the left ventricle of dogs with preserved systolic function

BACKGROUND

Right ventricular (RV) apical pacing may result in ventricular dyssynchrony, which is associated with functional and morphological changes in the left ventricle (LV). Our aim is to assess contraction and hypertrophy-related protein expression changes in the LV after RV apical pacing.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Six dogs underwent dual chamber pacemaker (DDD) implantation and atrioventricular nodal catheter ablation. The pacing group received atria-sensed RV apical pacing for 12 weeks. LV dyssynchrony was assessed with speckle tracking technique. Subsequently, hearts were processed for Western blotting. Four sham-operated dogs were included for comparison. After 12 weeks of RV pacing, cardiac chamber size and LV ejection fraction remained unchanged. Both electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony were evident in RV-paced dogs compared with sham-operated dogs. The late-activated LV lateral wall of paced dogs displayed a 23% reduction in the amount of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) ATPase, a 32% reduction in phospholamban levels, but a 3.6-fold increase in phospho-JNK expression, a 2.2-fold increase in phospho-p38, and 1.9-fold increase in phospho-ERK expression. There were no significant differences in the early-activated LV septum between paced and sham dogs.

CONCLUSIONS

Temporal dispersion of mechanical activation by RV apical pacing induced spatial dispersion of protein expression in the LV.

Biventricular pacing in paced patients with normal hearts

Right ventricular apical (RVA) stimulation, although beneficial in the treatment of symptomatic bradycardia, has proven detrimental in a substantial percentage of pacemaker recipients, leading to iatrogenic deterioration of left ventricular structure and function. Alternative right ventricular pacing sites appeared advantageous but their superiority has not been proven. Biventricular stimulation is effective in reducing ventricular dyssynchrony in subgroups of heart failure patients, improving their functional capacity, morbidity, and mortality. Therefore, it seems logical that this pacing strategy, by eliminating ventricular dyssynchrony, could play an important role in preventing the deleterious effects of chronic RVA stimulation in patients with normal hearts who undergo cardiac pacing for bradycardia indications. Preliminary investigations have yielded encouraging results, but further studies with harder endpoints such as quality of life, morbidity, and mortality are necessary to clarify the potentially advantageous effect of biventricular stimulation in paced patients with normal hearts.

Global electrophysiological and hemodynamic assessment of ventricular pacing employing non-contact mapping

OBJECTIVE

Right ventricular (RV) pacing has been associated with abnormal cardiac electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony, resulting in impaired global and regional ventricular pump function. This study aimed to characterize the relative effects of pacing site on left ventricular (LV) activation patterns and associated hemodynamic performances.

METHODS

Acute pacing was performed in anesthetized swine (n=10) instrumented for RV and LV pressure, noncontact mapping (NCM) of endocardial unipolar electrograms, surface ECG, aortic flow, and sonomicrometry. Bipolar endocardial pacing leads were positioned in the right atrial appendage (RAA), RV apex (RVA), and RV outflow tract (RVOT), while bipolar epicardial leads were positioned on the LV-free wall (LVFW) and LV apex (LVA).

RESULTS

LVFW and RVA pacing induced the largest increase in intraventricular electrical dyssynchrony (IVED; 32.2+/-10 ms, 21.7+/-4.1 ms, respectively; both p<0.01), whereas pacing from all sites increased QRS and total endocardial LV activation durations (p<0.01). The largest impairment of LV and RV contractility (dP/dtmax) and relaxation (dP/dtmin) was observed during RVA pacing (p= ns). Synchronous electrical activation patterns were observed on NCM during RVOT and LVA pacing. LVFW pacing was the only site that significantly increased tau values as compared to RAA pacing (approximately 25%), whereas LVA pacing elicited only slight increases (approximately 1%).

CONCLUSIONS

In swine with preserved ventricular conduction, in vivo pacing of the RVOT and LVA was associated with preserved, physiologically similar electrical activation sequences and LV function relative to RAA pacing. In contrast, RVA pacing caused widespread electrical dyssynchrony of the LV and prolonged activation durations, thereby impairing associated cardiac performance. Such insights into alternate site cardiac pacing, which employed the combination of high-resolution electrical mapping with real-time hemodynamic assessments, may further increase acute and long-term benefits in patients requiring permanent pacemaker support.

Evaluation of the effects of transvenous pacing site on left ventricular function and synchrony in healthy anesthetized dogs

OBJECTIVE-To compare the acute effects of cardiac pacing from various transvenous pacing sites on left ventricular (LV) function and synchrony in clinically normal dogs. ANIMALS-10 healthy adult mixed-breed dogs. PROCEDURES-Dogs were anesthetized, and dual-chamber transvenous biventricular pacing systems were implanted. Dogs were paced in single-chamber mode from the right atrial appendage (RAA) alone and in dual-chamber mode from the right ventricular apex (RVA), from the left ventricular free wall (LVFW), and simultaneously from the RVA and LVFW (BiV). Standard ECG and echocardiographic measurements, cardiac output measured with the lithium dilution method (LiDCO), and tissue Doppler-derived measurements of LV synchrony were obtained during each of the pacing configurations. RESULTS-Placement of the biventricular pacing systems was possible in 8 of the 10 dogs. The QRS duration was significantly different among all pacing sites, and the order of increasing duration was RAA, BiV, LVFW, and RVA. Pacing sites did not differ with respect to fractional shortening; however, pacing from the RVA resulted in a significantly lower ejection fraction than pacing from all other sites. During RVA and LVFW pacing, LiDCO was significantly lower than that at other sites; there was no significant difference between RAA and BiV pacing with respect to LiDCO. Although the degree of dyssynchrony was significantly lower during pacing from the RAA versus other ventricular pacing sites, it was not significantly different among sites. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE-Ventricular activation by RAA pacing provided the best LV function and synchrony. Pacing from the RVA worsened LV function, and although pacing from the LVFW improved it, BiV pacing may provide additional improvement.