Nerve puncture and apparent intraneural injection during ultrasound-guided axillary block does not invariably result in neurologic injury

Simulation in Regional Anaesthesia: A Narrative Review of Its History, Evolution and Future Prospects

Regional anaesthesia has seen a resurgence of sorts since the widespread advent of ultrasound into clinical practice. The ability to access hitherto inaccessible nerves and fascial planes in the human body whilst ensuring visualisation of the needle tip during block performance has opened the proverbial floodgates leading to its widespread adoption, further supported by a growing body of evidence for its many benefits in a patient's perioperative journey and pain management. The concomitant advancement of technology and the development of powerful simulation and artificial intelligence tools has given a much-needed impetus towards improving training and safe practice in regional anaesthesia. Methods: We performed a detailed search of databases, including PubMed Medline, Web of Science, EBSCO, Embase and the Cochrane Library, up to October 2024. Our search was conducted using phrases including (but not limited to) "history of anaesthesia", "history of simulation", "regional anaesthesia and simulation", AI and "artificial intelligence and anaesthesia".

Nerve block, nerve damage, and fluid injection pressure: overturning the myth

Histological and micro-ultrasound evidence rebuffs deep-rooted views on the nature of nerve block, nerve damage, and injection pressure monitoring. We propose that the ideal position of the needle tip for nerve block is between the innermost circumneural fascial layer and outer epineurium, with local anaesthetic passing circumferentially through adipose tissue. Thin, circumferential, subepineural expansion that is invisible to the naked eye was identified using micro-ultrasound, and could account for variability of outcomes in clinical practice. Pressure monitoring cannot differentiate between intrafascicular and extrafascicular injection. High injection pressure only indicates intraneural extrafascicular spread, not intrafascicular spread, because it is not possible to inject into the stiff endoneurium in most human nerves.

Neurological injury following peripheral nerve blocks: a narrative review of estimates of risks and the influence of ultrasound guidance

BACKGROUND

Peripheral nerve injury or post-block neurological dysfunction (PBND) are uncommon but a recognized complications of peripheral nerve blocks (PNB). A broad range of its incidence is noted in the literature and hence a critical appraisal of its occurrence is needed.

OBJECTIVE

In this review, we wanted to know the pooled estimates of PBND and further, determine its pooled estimates following various PNB over time. Additionally, we also sought to estimate the incidence of PBND with or without US guidance.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

A literature search was conducted in six databases. For the purposes of the review, we defined PBND as any new-onset sensorimotor disturbances in the distribution of the performed PNB either attributable to the PNB (when reported) or reported in the context of the PNB (when association with a PNB was not mentioned). Both prospective and retrospective studies which provided incidence of PBND at timepoints of interest (>48 hours to <2 weeks; >2 weeks to 6 weeks, 7 weeks to 5 months, 6 months to 1 year and >1 year durations) were included for review. Incidence data were used to provide pooled estimates (with 95% CI) of PBND at these time periods. Similar estimates were obtained to know the incidence of PBND with or without the use of US guidance. Additionally, PBND associated with individual PNB were obtained in a similar fashion with upper and lower limb PNB classified based on the anatomical location of needle insertion.

FINDINGS

The overall incidence of PBND decreased with time, with the incidence being approximately 1% at <2 weeks' time (Incidence per thousand (95% CI)= 9 (8; to 11)) to approximately 3/10 000 at 1 year (Incidence per thousand (95% CI)= 0. 3 (0.1; to 0.5)). Incidence of PBND differed for individual PNB with the highest incidence noted for interscalene block.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review adds information to existing literature that the neurological complications are rarer but seem to display a higher incidence for some blocks more than others. Use of US guidance may be associated with a lower incidence of PBND especially in those PNBs reporting a higher pooled estimates. Future studies need to standardize the reporting of PBND at various timepoints and its association to PNB.

Interlaminar versus transforaminal epidural steroid injections: a review of efficacy and safety

Spine intervention is an important treatment option for the management of spinal pain, and the numbers of the most representative epidural steroid injection (ESI) procedures performed are expected to increase significantly in the future along with increased life expectancy and the increasing prevalence of spinal disorders. Therefore, it is important to understand the efficacy of ESIs according to each spinal disorder they are administered to treat, and one must be familiar with the possible complications. In fact, although numerous ESI-related articles have been published, there is still considerable controversy regarding the efficacy of ESI procedures. Furthermore, due to the rarity of serious complications, most instances have been recorded in the form of case reports. In this article, we aimed to review the indications of cervical and lumbar ESIs and to compare interlaminar ESI (ILESI) and transforaminal ESI (TFESI) techniques in terms of analgesic efficacy, possible complications, and safety profiles. This article includes opinions based on the authors' experience with ESI indications and efficacy, and presents practical tips for coping with specific situations related to each complication. By combining the dedicated anatomical understanding of radiologists with image-guided interventions, ESI is expected to stand out in the rapidly expanding field of spine intervention.

Ultrasound-Guided Block of the Sciatic and the Femoral Nerves in Rabbits-A Descriptive Anatomical Study

The rabbit is a popular animal model for human biomechanical research involving surgery on the hind limb. Mortality is higher in rabbits when undergoing general anesthesia compared to dogs and cats. Moreover, due to their nature as prey animals, rabbits have a tendency to hide signs of pain, making it challenging to detect discomfort at an early stage. Incorporating regional anesthesia into an anesthetic protocol can greatly reduce the requirements for systemic anesthetic and analgesic drugs, thereby minimizing associated side effects. In other species, a block of the sciatic (ScN) and the femoral nerves (FN) is usually applied in patients undergoing hind limb surgery. In phase 1 of this study, the ScN and the FN have been localized and an appropriate approach has been evaluated under sonographic guidance. In phase 2, a mixture of new methylene blue and lidocaine have been administered to the ScN and the FN in 10 cadavers (20 hind limbs). Staining of the nerves was evaluated by dissection. Ultrasonographically, the ScN appeared as a binocular structure surrounded by a hyperechoic rim. The FN appeared as a hypoechoic structure in the dorsal part of the iliopsoas muscle (IPM), becoming hyperechoic/honey-comb-like in the ventral part. Both nerves could be successfully stained in all animals over a median length of 2.3 cm which was considered effective. This technique allows feasible and accurate access to block the ScN and the FN and may lead to successful analgesia in rabbits undergoing hind limb surgery.

"Knowing It Before Blocking It," the ABCD of the Peripheral Nerves: Part C (Prevention of Nerve Injuries)

"A clever person solves the problem. A wise person avoids it" (Albert Einstein). There is no convincing evidence that any modality 100% effectively prevents nerve injury. The risk of nerve injury remains the same even with the ultrasound due to limitations in the resolution of images and inter-operator and inter-patient differences. In a nutshell, caution is required when dealing with precious nerves in the perioperative period, either during peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs), patient positioning, or surgery. Identifying pre-existing nerve injury, either due to trauma or an existing neuropathy, and preventing further nerve injury should be an important goal in providing safe regional anesthesia (RA). Multimodal monitoring is key to avoiding multifactorial nerve injuries. The use of triple guidance (ultrasound + peripheral nerve stimulator + injection pressure monitor) during PNBs further improves the safety of RA. The ultrasound helps in real-time visualization of the nerve, needle, and drug spread; the peripheral nerve stimulator helps confirm the target nerves; and the injection pressure monitor helps avoid nerve injury. Such multimodalities can also give the confidence to administer PNB without risk of nerve injury. This article is part of the comprehensive overview of the essential understanding of peripheral nerves before blocking them. It describes various preventive measures to avoid peripheral nerve injuries while administering PNBs. It will help readers understand the importance of prevention in each step to avoid perioperative PNIs.

US for Traumatic Nerve Injury, Entrapment Neuropathy, and Imaging-guided Perineural Injection

US is commonly performed to help diagnose traumatic peripheral nerve injury and entrapment neuropathy, particularly with superficial nerves, where higher spatial resolution provides an advantage over MRI. Other advantages of US include dynamic evaluation, easy contralateral comparison, fewer implant contraindications, less artifact from ferromagnetic debris, and facile needle guidance for perineural injections. The authors review peripheral nerve US for traumatic peripheral nerve injury with an emphasis on injury grading and entrapment neuropathy and describe best-practice techniques for US-guided perineural injections while highlighting specific techniques and indications. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2022.

Phrenic Nerve Block and Respiratory Effort in Pigs and Critically Ill Patients with Acute Lung Injury

BACKGROUND

Strong spontaneous inspiratory efforts can be difficult to control and prohibit protective mechanical ventilation. Instead of using deep sedation and neuromuscular blockade, the authors hypothesized that perineural administration of lidocaine around the phrenic nerve would reduce tidal volume (VT) and peak transpulmonary pressure in spontaneously breathing patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

METHODS

An established animal model of acute respiratory distress syndrome with six female pigs was used in a proof-of-concept study. The authors then evaluated this technique in nine mechanically ventilated patients under pressure support exhibiting driving pressure greater than 15 cm H2O or VT greater than 10 ml/kg of predicted body weight. Esophageal and transpulmonary pressures, electrical activity of the diaphragm, and electrical impedance tomography were measured in pigs and patients. Ultrasound imaging and a nerve stimulator were used to identify the phrenic nerve, and perineural lidocaine was administered sequentially around the left and right phrenic nerves.

RESULTS

Results are presented as median [interquartile range, 25th to 75th percentiles]. In pigs, VT decreased from 7.4 ml/kg [7.2 to 8.4] to 5.9 ml/kg [5.5 to 6.6] (P < 0.001), as did peak transpulmonary pressure (25.8 cm H2O [20.2 to 27.2] to 17.7 cm H2O [13.8 to 18.8]; P < 0.001) and driving pressure (28.7 cm H2O [20.4 to 30.8] to 19.4 cm H2O [15.2 to 22.9]; P < 0.001). Ventilation in the most dependent part decreased from 29.3% [26.4 to 29.5] to 20.1% [15.3 to 20.8] (P < 0.001). In patients, VT decreased (8.2 ml/ kg [7.9 to 11.1] to 6.0 ml/ kg [5.7 to 6.7]; P < 0.001), as did driving pressure (24.7 cm H2O [20.4 to 34.5] to 18.4 cm H2O [16.8 to 20.7]; P < 0.001). Esophageal pressure, peak transpulmonary pressure, and electrical activity of the diaphragm also decreased. Dependent ventilation only slightly decreased from 11.5% [8.5 to 12.6] to 7.9% [5.3 to 8.6] (P = 0.005). Respiratory rate did not vary. Variables recovered 1 to 12.7 h [6.7 to 13.7] after phrenic nerve block.

CONCLUSIONS

Phrenic nerve block is feasible, lasts around 12 h, and reduces VT and driving pressure without changing respiratory rate in patients under assisted ventilation.

EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE

Accuracy of ultrasonography predicting spread location following intraneural and subparaneural injections: a scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Ultrasonography is useful for detecting intraneural injections. However, the reliability of the sonographic findings of intraneural and subparaneural injections in terms of true spread location and their association with intrafascicular deposits has not been systematically evaluated.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Our objectives were: 1) to explore the reliability of sonographic findings of intraneural and subparaneural injections when validated with tests of true spread such as histology, dissection, or imaging; and 2) to evaluate their association with intrafascicular deposits. A scoping review was conducted according to Joanna Briggs guidelines. Cinahl, PubMed, ProQuest, ScienceDirect, Scopus and Cochrane databases were searched for studies on adults, cadavers, and animal models. Pediatric studies were excluded.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The search strategy found 598 citations. Following screening, 19 studies were selected. Intraneural injections occurred in the brachial plexus, sciatic, femoral, and median nerves. Subparaneural injections in popliteal, supraclavicular and interscalene blocks. Sixteen different ultrasound findings were used to label injection location. Subepineural deposits within individual nerves occurred occasionally following subparaneural injections, regardless of nerve expansion. Overall, five studies reported intrafascicular deposits, two of which frequently, following intraneural and subparaneural injections. None of the currently used ultrasound findings was predictive of intrafascicular deposits.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that sonographic parameters of intraneural and subparaneural injections are reliable in terms of detecting spread location. Intrafascicular injectate deposition may occur, albeit infrequently, particularly in the proximal brachial plexus. Our findings support the judicious interrogation of sonographic parameters suggestive of incipient intraneural injection.

What Is the Minimum Effective Volume of Local Anaesthetic Applied in Brachial Plexus Blockage With an Axillary Approach Under Ultrasonography Guidance?

Peripheral nerve blocks with the use of ultrasonography (USG) allow visualisation of both the structures and nerves and make the block administrations safe, quick, and comfortable. However, few publications concerning the minimum local anesthetic (LA) volume are capable of providing blocks. This study aimed to find the minimum effective LA volume in brachial plexus blockage administrations with an axillary approach accompanied by ultrasonography in hand, elbow, and forehand operations. Materials and Method The study included a total of 55 patients (classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II) who underwent hand surgery by administering USG-guided axillary brachial plexus blockage. The ulnar, median, and radial nerves were located, and the minimum effective LA volume was investigated starting with a total of 21 ml of bupivacaine 0.5%. After accomplishing the blockage, the volume was decreased by 0.5 ml for each nerve. Block administration time, block onset times, anesthesia times, and time to first analgesic requirement were recorded. Results The minimum effective LA volume for each nerve was 2.5 ml for a total of 7.5 ml. In comparing block administration times, there were no differences between high or low volume groups. It was found that sensory block onset time was 17 minutes for 7.5 ml and 11 minutes for 21 ml; sensory block regression time was six hours for 7.5 ml and 10.4 hours for 21 ml, respectively. This regression was statistically significant. The first analgesic requirement was 5.8 - 16.6 hours, respectively, for each group. Conclusion In the administration of an USG-guided axillary block, sufficient anesthesia can be achieved by administering 2.5 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% for each nerve. However, it might be kept in mind that motor and sensory block onset time will be extended and regression time and time to the first analgesic requirement will be shorter with this volume. In addition, more advanced studies must be done for the determination of the optimum volume which can be used.

Real-time visualisation of peripheral nerve trauma during subepineural injection in pig brachial plexus using micro-ultrasound

BACKGROUND

Nerve damage is consistently demonstrated after subepineural injection in animal studies, but not after purposeful injection in patients participating in clinical studies. There is a need to better visualise nerves in order to understand the structural changes that occur during subepineural injection.

METHODS

We scanned the brachial plexuses of three anaesthetised pigs using micro-ultrasound imaging (55-22 MHz probe), inserted 21 gauge block needles into the radial, median, and axillary nerves, and injected two 0.5 ml boluses of saline into nerves at a rate of 12 ml min^-1. Our objectives were to measure the area and diameter of nerves and fascicles, and to describe changes in nerve anatomy, comparing our findings with histology.

RESULTS

Images were acquired at 42 sites across 18 nerves in three pigs and compared dimensions (geometric ratio; 95% confidence interval; P value). As expected, the nerve cross-sectional area was greater in the proximal brachial plexus compared with the mid-plexus (2.10; 1.07-4.11; P<0.001) and the distal plexus (2.64; 1.42-4.87; P<0.001). Nerve area expanded after 0.5 ml injection (2.13; 1.48-3.08; P<0.001). Using microultrasound, subepineural injection was characterised by nerve and fascicle rotation, uniform, or localised swelling and epineural rupture. Micro-ultrasound revealed a unique pattern suggestive of subperineural injection after a median nerve injection, and good face validity with histology. Histology showed epineural trauma and inflammation to the perineurium.

CONCLUSION

We accurately identified fascicles and real-time structural changes to peripheral nerves using micro-ultrasound. This is the first study to visualise in vivo and in real-time the motion of nerves and fascicles in response to anaesthetic needle insertion and fluid injection.

Identification and economic burden of main adverse events of nerve injuries caused by regional anesthesia: a systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Anesthesiologists and hospitals are increasingly confronted with costs associated with the complications of Peripheral Nerve Blocks (PNB) procedures. The objective of our study was to identify the incidence of the main adverse events associated with regional anesthesia, particularly during anesthetic PNB, and to evaluate the associated healthcare and social costs.

METHODS

According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a systematic search on EMBASE and PubMed with the following search strategy: ("regional anesthesia" OR "nerve block") AND ("complications" OR "nerve lesion" OR "nerve damage" OR "nerve injury"). Studies on patients undergoing a regional anesthesia procedure other than spinal or epidural were included. Targeted data of the selected studies were extracted and further analyzed.

RESULTS

Literature search revealed 487 articles, 21 of which met the criteria to be included in our analysis. Ten of them were included in the qualitative and 11 articles in the quantitative synthesis. The analysis of costs included data from four studies and 2,034 claims over 51,242 cases. The median claim consisted in 39,524 dollars in the United States and 22,750 pounds in the United Kingdom. The analysis of incidence included data from seven studies involving 424,169 patients with an overall estimated incidence of 137/10,000.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite limitations, we proposed a simple model of cost calculation. We found that, despite the relatively low incidence of adverse events following PNB, their associated costs were relevant and should be carefully considered by healthcare managers and decision makers.

Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Nerve Blocks Performed by Orthopedic Surgeons: A Retrospective, Multicenter Study in Akita Prefecture, Japan

The shortage of doctors is a societal problem, especially in rural areas such as Akita Prefecture, Japan. Therefore, it is not unusual in Akita for orthopedic surgeons to perform upper and lower limb surgeries under ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks managed by the operators themselves. Multicenter studies of ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks performed by orthopedic surgeons have not been reported. The purpose of this study was to clarify the safety and reliability of ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks performed by orthopedic surgeons in Akita. A total of 1,674 upper extremity surgery cases operated under ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks at 8 hospitals in Akita prefecture from April 2016 to April 2018 were investigated retrospectively. These blocks were performed by a total of 37 orthopedic surgeons, including senior surgeons and residents. In 321 of the 1,674 cases (19%), local anesthetics were added to the surgical field. Two cases with special factors were converted to general anesthesia. There were 2 cases of complications associated with the nerve block, but they were all transient and recovered promptly. The block site and the hospital where the block was performed showed a significant relationship with the addition of local anesthetics to the surgical site (P < 0.001). Surgery time, age at surgery, and surgical site showed no significant relationships with the addition of local anesthetics. The volume of the anesthetic used for the nerve block showed a significant inverse relationship with the addition of local anesthetics (P=0.040). Many orthopedic surgeons in Akita prefecture began to perform ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks, which had a reliable anesthesia effect with no noticeable complications, whether performed by residents or senior orthopedic surgeons, and this is a useful anesthetic technique for orthopedic surgeons.

Real-Time Injection Pressure Sensing and Minimal Intensity Stimulation Combination During Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Nerve Blocks: An Exploratory Observational Trial

BACKGROUND

Nerve damage can occur after peripheral nerve block (PNB). Ultrasound guidance does not eliminate the risk of intraneural injection or nerve injury. Combining nerve stimulation and injection pressure (IP) monitoring with ultrasound guidance has been suggested to optimize needle tip location in PNB. In this prospective observational study, we hypothesized that measured pairs of IP and minimum intensity of stimulation (MIS) might differentiate successive needle tip locations established by high-resolution ultrasound during PNB.

METHODS

For this exploratory study, 240 observations for 40 ultrasound-guided PNBs were studied in 28 patients scheduled for orthopedic surgery. During the progression of the needle to the nerve observed by ultrasonography, the IP was measured continuously using a computerized pressure-sensing device with a low flow rate of solution. Stimulation thresholds and electrical impedance were obtained by an impedance analyzer coupled to the nerve stimulator at 6 successive needle positions. The median (quartile) or mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) was reported. A mixed model analysis was used, and the sample was also explored using a classification and regression tree (CART) algorithm.

RESULTS

Specific combinations of IP and MIS were measured for subcutaneous, epimysium contact, intramuscular, nerve contact (231 mm Hg [203-259 mm Hg] and 1.70 mA [1.38-2.02 mA]), intraneural location (188 mm Hg [152-224 mm Hg] and 0.58 mA [0.46-0.70 mA]), and subparaneural location (47 mm Hg [41-53 mm Hg] and 1.35 mA [1.09-1.61 mA]). The CART algorithm shows that the optimal subparaneural needle tip position might be defined by the lowest pressure (<81.3 mm Hg) and MIS (<1.5 mA) cutoffs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our exploratory study evaluated concepts to generate hypotheses. The combinations of IP and MIS might help the physician during a PNB procedure. A low IP and low MIS might confirm a subparaneural location, and a high IP and a low MIS might be an alert for the intraneural location of the needle tip.

Combination Lower Extremity Nerve Blocks and Their Effect on Postoperative Pain and Opioid Consumption: A Systematic Review

The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature examining postoperative outcomes following single site and combined peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs), including (1) sciatic and femoral nerve, (2) popliteal and saphenous nerve, and (3) popliteal and ankle nerve, during elective foot and ankle surgery. We hypothesized that combination blocks would decrease postoperative narcotic consumption and afford more effective postoperative pain control as compared to general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia, or single site PNBs. A review of the literature was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 2009 to October 2019. We identified studies by using synonyms for "foot," "ankle" "pain management," "opioid," and "nerve block." Included articles explicitly focused on elective foot and ankle procedures performed under general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia, PNB, or with some combination of these techniques. PNB techniques included femoral, adductor canal, sciatic, popliteal, saphenous, and ankle blocks, as well as blocks that combined multiple anatomic sites. Outcomes measured included postoperative narcotic consumption as well as patient-reported efficacy of pain control. Twenty-eight studies encompassing 6703 patients were included. Of the included studies, 57% were randomized controlled trials, 18% were prospective comparison studies, and 25% were retrospective comparison studies. Postoperative opioid consumption and postoperative pain levels were reduced over the first 24 to 48 hours with the use of combined PNBs when compared with single site PNBs, both when used as primary anesthesia or when used in concert with general anesthesia either alone or combined with systemic/local anesthesia in the first 24 to 48 hours following surgery. Studies demonstrated higher reported patient satisfaction of postoperative pain control in patients who received combined PNB. Nine of 14 (64%) studies reported no neurologic related complications with an overall reported rate among all studies ranging from 0% to 41%. Our study identified substantial improvement in postoperative pain levels, postoperative opioid consumption, and patient satisfaction in patients receiving PNB when compared with patients who did not receive PNB. Published data also demonstrated that combination PNB are more effective than single-site PNB for all data points. Notably, the addition of a femoral nerve block to a popliteal nerve block during use of a thigh tourniquet, as well as addition of either saphenous or ankle blockade to popliteal nerve block during use of calf tourniquet, may increase overall block effectiveness. Serious complications including neurologic damage following PNB administration are rare but do exist.

Does subepineural injection damage the nerve integrity? A technical report from four amputated limbs

Local anesthetic (LA) injection outside the sheath in epineural or paraneural connective tissue is considered safe practice among regional anesthesiologists. There is limited evidence as to whether neurological complications occur if LA is injected inside the sheath (subepineural - intraneural). We performed ultrasound guided injections at the level of undivided sciatic nerve in four amputated lower limbs. In two specimens, LA was injected in epineural connective tissue (paraneural tissue) and in another two specimens by penetrating the outer nerve sheath (hyperechoic epineurium). Ultrasonography demonstrated an increase in the size of nerve and macroscopic findings revealed fascicular tracings with sub-epineural injections. Limbs were sent for histological analysis in formalin containers. Pathologist performed the analysis which demonstrated an intact perineurium and a breach in the epineurium. We conclude that sub-epineural injections are unsafe and injection should be done in paraneural tissue to ensure safety and avoid unwanted neurological sequelae after the block.

Ultrasound-Guided Transgluteal Sciatic Nerve Block for Gluteal Procedural Analgesia

BACKGROUND

Adequate analgesia is difficult to achieve in patients with an abscess requiring incision and drainage (I&D). There has been a recent increase in regional anesthesia use in the emergency department (ED) to aid in acute musculoskeletal pain relief. Specifically, transgluteal sciatic nerve (TGSN) block has been used as an adjunct treatment for certain chronic lumbar and lower extremity pain syndromes in the ED.

CASE REPORT

A 21-year-old woman presented to the ED with a painful gluteal abscess. The pain was so severe that the patient barely tolerated light palpation to the abscess area. Using dynamic ultrasound guidance, a TGSN block was performed with significant pain reduction. Ultrasonographic confirmation of abscess was obtained followed by definitive I&D. She was discharged from the ED and her incision site was healing well at the time of follow-up. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Abscess I&D is a common procedure in the ED. Procedural analgesia for I&D can be difficult to obtain. We describe the TGSN block as an additional analgesic option to be used for procedural analgesia. The use of regional anesthesia has the potential to decrease unwanted and at times dangerous side effects of opiate use and resource utilization of procedural sedation while optimizing patient comfort.

Short-Term Effects of Deliberate Subparaneural or Subepineural Injections With Saline Solution or Bupivacaine 0.75% in the Sciatic Nerve of Rabbits

Background: Ultrasound (US)-guided techniques for peripheral nerve blockade have revealed that intraneural injections are relatively frequent and not necessarily associated with neurological deficits. Objectives: To evaluate the short-term effects of deliberate injections performed under direct vision in two different sites of the sciatic nerve (ScN). Material and Methods: Seventy-two New Zealand white rabbits randomly assigned to one of four experimental groups (n = 18) were employed. All procedures were conducted at a proximal femoral level where the ScN incorporates the common peroneal nerve and the tibial nerve (TN). Fixed volumes of 0.5 ml of saline solution (ES group) or bupivacaine 0.75% (EB group) were administered extrafascicularly inside the paraneurium of the ScN or intrafascicularly (IS and IB groups) under the epineurium of the TN. Cross-sectional area (CSA) and relative echogenicity (RE) of the entire ScN were determined by US before injections, after injections, and at 3 and 7 days. ScN samples were obtained for structural and ultrastructural histopathological studies. Proprioceptive, sensorial, and motor function were clinically evaluated on a daily basis. Results: The CSA of the ScN increased significantly immediately after injections when compared with pre-injection values in all groups (p < 0.05). The RE of the ScN decreased in relation to pre-injection values in all groups (p < 0.05). The CSA and RE of the ScN returned to normal values 7 days after injections in almost all groups. Injected nerves showed histological signs of mild perineural inflammation. Histopathological scores were not significantly different between groups (p > 0.05). The architecture of the ScN was preserved in all rabbits at 3 days and in 31/32 rabbits at 7 days. A focal area of damaged nerve fibers with degeneration of the axons and myelin sheath affecting the TN was observed in one rabbit of the IB group. Nerve function was not clinically impaired in any case. Conclusion: Despite the lack of severe nerve disruption observed in most rabbits, the evidence of a focal area of damaged nerve fibers in one rabbit injected intrafascicularly with bupivacaine confirms that intrafascicular injections should be avoided as they may increase the risk of nerve damage.

Round Acupuncture for the Treatment of Recurrent Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Objectives

Round Acupuncture having blunt end has developed from acupotomy. This case report is to find out that Round Acupuncture is effective in treating patients with recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), which has not improved by steroid injection or acupotomy.

Methods

Round Acupuncture was inserted into the distal fibers of transverse carpal ligament and released toward the proximal fibers. Treatment was performed three times in total. T ingling, numbn ess, night pain and swelling sensation were assessed, and provocative maneuvers were also used.

Results

After treat ment, all symptoms completely disappeared and the patient had no recurrence until 3 months after treatment.

Conclusion

Round Acupuncture co uld be an effective treatment for recurrent CTS.

Comparison of the effectiveness of circumferential versus non-circumferential spread in median and ulnar nerve blocks. A double-blind randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Circumferential (C) spread of local anesthetic around the nerve is recommended for a successful nerve block. We tested the hypothesis that C spread produces a more complete block than non-circumferential (NC) spread.

METHODS

We randomized 124 patients undergoing open carpal tunnel syndrome surgery to receive C or NC spread ultrasound-guided median and ulnar nerve blocks. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who developed complete sensory block measured at 5, 15 and 30 min. The loss of cold sensation was graded as: 0 (complete block), 1 (incomplete block), or 2 (no block). Secondary outcomes included motor block, nerve swelling and adverse events.

RESULTS

In group C, complete sensory block at 5 min was 2.4 (95% CI 1.0 to 5.7; p=0.04) times more frequent in the median nerve and 3.0 (95% CI 1.2 to 7.2; p=0.01) times more frequent in the ulnar nerve compared with group C. However, at 15 and 30 min, it was similar between groups. Complete motor block was more frequent in group C than in group NC for both the median nerve: 1.5 (95% CI 1.1 to 2.2; p<0.01) at 15 min, 1.1 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.2; p=0.02) at 30 min, and the ulnar nerve: 1.7 (95% CI 1.2 to 2.6; p<0.01) at 15 min, 1.2 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.4; p<0.01) at 30 min. The incidence of nerve swelling and adverse effects was similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

C spread around the median and ulnar nerves at the level of the antecubital fossa generates more complete sensory and motor blocks compared with NC spread.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

EudraCT 2011-002608-34 and NCT01603680.

Functional anatomy of the nerve and optimal placement of the needle for successful (and) safe nerve blocks

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Summarize the current thinking concerning the clinically relevant aspects of nerve anatomy and best injection sites for nerve blocks.

RECENT FINDINGS

The widespread use of ultrasound in regional anesthesia has changed the practice of regional anesthesia and created new possibilities. Among them is the ability to identify fascial planes, and this has become the basis for a new group of blocks, the fascial plane blocks. In this kind of blocks, the target for injection is the plane itself and not a nerve in particular. transversus abdominis plane, pectoralis muscles, erector spinae plane blocks are some examples of fascial blocks. Because injecting into a fascial plane is not controversial, these blocks are not included in our discussion of optimal placement of the needle.To determine optimal needle placement, it is important to have a clear definition of what constitutes intraneural. Although, there is almost universal agreement that the violation of the epineurium defines the intraneural concept, the literature include several studies where this assessment is erroneous.Although intentional intraneural injection is still considered objectionable, some literature suggests that injecting intraneurally, especially if extrafascicular, may be benign. This evidence is limited and anecdotal.

SUMMARY

It is necessary to have a better understanding of what intraneural injection is when dealing with any type of nerve blocks, be that single nerve, plexuses, or the sciatic nerve. Perineural injections provide successful anesthesia without putting the nerve integrity at risk. That practice is supported by years of experience and common sense. Currently, there is no evidence to support any kind of intraneural injections, intrafascicular or extrafascicular.

Analysis of Epineurial Lidocaine Injection for Nerve Transfers in a Rat Sciatic Nerve Model

PURPOSE

Nerve transfers for peripheral nerve injuries can result in variable outcomes. We investigated the neuroprotective effect of epineurial lidocaine injection in the donor nerve prior to transection, with the hypothesis that proximal axon loss would be decreased with consequent increased neuroregeneration and functional recovery.

METHODS

A rat sciatic nerve model was used with 4 intervention groups: (1) lidocaine; (2) lidocaine/calcium gluconate (CG); (3) CG; or (4) saline (control). Behavioral testing and qualitative and quantitative histological evaluation was performed at 8 and 12 weeks. Histological assays included transmission electron microscopy, retrograde fluorogold labeling, and whole mount immunostaining.

RESULTS

Functional assessments through the sciatic functional index and Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan scale showed a statistically significant increase in recovery at 8 and 12 weeks with lidocaine treatment. Significantly higher axonal counts were obtained in the lidocaine-treated groups. Fragmentation and increased myelin damage was present in the CG and saline groups. Retrograde fluorogold labeling showed a statistically significant increase in the number of L4-6 dorsal root ganglion neurons in the lidocaine-treated groups. Whole mount immunostaining identified extension of the axonal growth cone past the nerve coaptation site in lidocaine-treated groups, but not in CG and saline groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that epineurial lidocaine injection prior to donor nerve transection for nerve transfer has a neuroprotective effect, resulting in increased proximal axon counts and improved functional recovery.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

These findings may have direct clinical application because epineurial lidocaine can be used in surgery as a simple and inexpensive intervention for promoting improved clinical outcomes after nerve transfer.

The Ultrasound Anatomy of Nerves in the Interscalene Groove: Can We Reliably Distinguish the Nerve Structures for Needle Placement During Nerve Blocks?

In the interscalene groove, nerve structures are in close proximity and may not be visible as separate structures, increasing the risk of insertion of the needle tip within the epineurium. We evaluated whether experienced regional anesthesiologists can distinguish between nerve elements lying in close proximity on ultrasound images.Brachial plexus elements from 4 nonpreserved cadavers were arranged in a water bath. Ultrasound images of the nerve roots and trunks were taken. Regional anesthesiologists and residents were asked whether they could distinguish the nerves as 2 separate structures and if they could identify a pair of nerve roots versus a single trunk.Attending anesthesiologists reported the ability to discriminate 2 nerve structures when a 2-mm space was arranged between them in 54% of images; however, when in direct contact, this recognition was significantly lower. The residents reported a higher ability to discriminate the 2 nerves in all scenarios. In addition, the attending anesthesiologists successfully identified paired nerve roots versus nerve trunks in 70% of the images, significantly higher than chance (P = 0.01), whereas the fraction of correct resident responses was not significantly different from guessing.When nerves were placed in close proximity, experienced regional anesthesiologists had difficulty identifying them as separate structures and were incorrect nearly one-third of the time in discriminating 2 closely positioned roots versus a nerve trunk. This underscores the importance of cautious needle insertion into the interscalene groove, where nerve elements are often juxtaposed one to another.

Effects of Intraneural Injection of Dexmedetomidine in Combination With Ropivacaine in Rat Sciatic Nerve Block

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Dexmedetomidine is known to have neural protection effect via attenuation of inflammatory responses induced by local anesthetics. We investigated whether intraneural dexmedetomidine is effective for attenuating or preventing neural injury resulting from inadvertent intraneural injection of local anesthetic.

METHODS

Rats were randomly divided, and left sciatic nerve was surgically exposed. The rats received no injection (control group) or intraneural injections of 0.2 mL of normal saline (saline group), 0.2 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine (ropivacaine group), or 0.2 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.5 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine (ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine group). Interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-1β messenger RNA (mRNA) levels were detected at 60 minutes after intraneural injection in experiment 1 (5 per group). Sensory and motor functions were assessed until the return of normal sensory and motor functions, and histopathological and ultrastructure analysis were performed at 4 weeks after intraneural injection in experiment 2 (8 per group).

RESULTS

Dexmedetomidine with ropivacaine better enhanced sensory and motor blockade than ropivacaine alone. IL-6 (3.2 ± 1.0 vs 5.9 ± 2.1), IL-1β (1.1 ± 0.1 vs 2.2 ± 0.7) levels, scores of axon and myelinated fiber degeneration (1 [0-2] vs 2 [1-3]), and demyelinated fiber percentages (20.1 ± 10.4 vs 48.3 ± 12.7) were lower in the ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine group than in the ropivacaine group. No animals showed any signs of permanent neurological deficit.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraneural dexmedetomidine has sensory and motor blockade-enhancing effects, anti-inflammatory properties, and protective effects against neural injury. These findings suggest that dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant has beneficial effects in rat when intraneural injection of local anesthetic occurs.

Regional anesthetic techniques for the pelvic limb and abdominal wall in small animals: A review of the literature and technique description

Increasing interest in using peripheral nerve blocks in small animals is evident, given the numerous studies published recently on this topic in important veterinary journals. Initially, research was focused on intraoperative analgesia to the pelvic limb, and several descriptions of lumbosacral plexus, femoral and sciatic nerve blocks have been described in studies. There is recent interest in developing techniques for somatosensory blockade of the abdominal wall. This article is the second part of a two-part review of regional anesthesia (RA) in small animals, and its aim is to discuss the most relevant studies in the veterinary literature, where objective methods of nerve location have been used, and to illustrate in pictures the currently used techniques for providing RA to the abdominal wall and the pelvic limb in small animals.

Optical signature of nerve tissue-Exploratory ex vivo study comparing optical, histological, and molecular characteristics of different adipose and nerve tissues

Background

During several anesthesiological procedures, needles are inserted through the skin of a patient to target nerves. In most cases, the needle traverses several tissues—skin, subcutaneous adipose tissue, muscles, nerves, and blood vessels—to reach the target nerve. A clear identification of the target nerve can improve the success of the nerve block and reduce the rate of complications. This may be accomplished with diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) which can provide a quantitative measure of the tissue composition. The goal of the current study was to further explore the morphological, biological, chemical, and optical characteristics of the tissues encountered during needle insertion to improve future DRS classification algorithms.

Methods

To compare characteristics of nerve tissue (sciatic nerve) and adipose tissues, the following techniques were used: histology, DRS, absorption spectrophotometry, high‐resolution magic‐angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance (HR‐MAS NMR) spectroscopy, and solution 2D ¹³C‐¹H heteronuclear single‐quantum coherence spectroscopy. Tissues from five human freshly frozen cadavers were examined.

Results

Histology clearly highlights a higher density of cellular nuclei, collagen, and cytoplasm in fascicular nerve tissue (IFAS). IFAS showed lower absorption of light around 1200 nm and 1750 nm, higher absorption around 1500 nm and 2000 nm, and a shift in the peak observed around 1000 nm. DRS measurements showed a higher water percentage and collagen concentration in IFAS and a lower fat percentage compared to all other tissues. The scattering parameter (b) was highest in IFAS. The HR‐MAS NMR data showed three extra chemical peak shifts in IFAS tissue.

Conclusion

Collagen, water, and cellular nuclei concentration are clearly different between nerve fascicular tissue and other adipose tissue and explain some of the differences observed in the optical absorption, DRS, and HR‐NMR spectra of these tissues. Some differences observed between fascicular nerve tissue and adipose tissues cannot yet be explained but may be helpful in improving the discriminatory capabilities of DRS in anesthesiology procedures. Lasers Surg. Med. 50:948–960, 2018. © 2018 The Authors. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Low-concentration distal nerve blocks with 0.125% levobupivacaine versus systemic analgesia for ambulatory trapeziectomy performed under axillary block: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Trapeziectomy is one of the most painful procedures in ambulatory surgery. This prospective randomized trial aimed to compare postoperative pain control using distal peripheral nerve blocks (dPNB) with a low concentration of a long-acting local anesthetic versus conventional systemic analgesia.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients undergoing trapeziectomy were randomized to receive levobupivacaine 0.125% 5 mL on radial and median nerves at the elbow (dNB group), or not to receive these blocks (control group). In both groups, surgery was performed under axillary block (mepivacaine 1% 20 mL) and the same analgesic regimen was prescribed at discharge. The primary outcome was postoperative pain at 24 and 48 hours after surgery and maximum pain score on the first and second postoperative day. Secondary outcomes were duration of dPNB, rescue analgesia requirements, opioid-related side effects, consumption and effectiveness of antiemetic therapy, and upper limb motor block.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were analyzed. Maximum pain intensity was moderate to severe (dPNB vs. control) in 33.3% vs. 92.3% (P=0.002) on the first day after surgery and 20.8% vs. 80.8% (P<0.001) on the second day. The average duration of analgesia after dPNB was 10 hours and no patient reported motor block. dPNB reduced rescue analgesia requirements and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).

CONCLUSIONS

dPNB on target nerves provided better analgesia than systemic analgesia after trapeziectomy performed under axillary block. Opioid consumption and the incidence of PONV were lower in the dPNB group.

Intraneural injection of a test dose of local anesthetic in peripheral nerves - does it induce histological changes in nerve tissue?

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES

Most anesthesiologists use the injection of a test dose of local anesthetic in order to evaluate the final needle tip position. Thus, the intraneural injection of a full dose can be avoided. The aim of this study was to analyze whether an intraneural injection of a test dose of bupivacaine could trigger histological changes.

METHODS

Intraneural injections under direct vision were performed in 40 brachial plexus nerves in seven anesthetized pigs. Tibial nerves served as positive and negative controls. Two milliliter of bupivacaine 0.5% was injected in three nerves on the left brachial plexus. For control of local anesthetic's toxicity Ringer's solution was applied intraneurally on the right side. After maintaining 48 h of general anesthesia, the nerves were resected. The specimens were processed for histological examination and assessed for inflammation (hematoxylin and eosin stain, CD68-immunohistochemistry) and myelin damage (Kluver-Barrera stain). The degree of nerve injury was rated on a scale from 0 (no injury) to 4 (severe injury).

RESULTS

Statistical analysis showed no significant differences between the bupivacaine group [median (interquartile range) 1 (1-1.5)] and the Ringer's solution group [1 (0.5-2) P = 0.772]. Mild myelin alteration was found in 12.5% of all specimens following intraneural injection, irrespective of the applied substance.

CONCLUSIONS

"In our experimental study, intraneural injection of 2 ml of bupivacaine or Ringer's solution showed comparable mild inflammation. Nevertheless, inflammation can only be prevented by strictly avoiding nerve perforation followed by intraneural injection, as mechanical nerve perforation is a key factor for evolving inflammation.

Fluoroscopically Guided Epidural Injections of the Cervical and Lumbar Spine

Advances in imaging and the development of injection techniques have enabled spinal intervention to become an important tool in managing chronic spinal pain. Epidural steroid injection (ESI) is one of the most widely used spinal interventions; it directly delivers drugs into the epidural space to relieve pain originating from degenerative spine disorders-central canal stenoses and neural foraminal stenoses-or disk herniations. Knowledge of the normal anatomy of the epidural space is essential to perform an effective and safe ESI and to recognize possible complications. Although computed tomographic (CT) or combined CT-fluoroscopic guidance has been increasingly used in ESI, conventional fluoroscopic guidance is generally performed. In ESI, drugs are delivered into the epidural space by interlaminar or transforaminal routes in the cervical spine or by interlaminar, transforaminal, or caudal routes in the lumbar spine. Epidurography is usually performed before drug delivery to verify the proper position of the needle in the epidural space. A small amount of contrast agent is injected with fluoroscopic guidance. Familiarity with the findings on a typical "true" epidurogram (demonstrating correct needle placement in the epidural space) permits proper performance of ESI. Findings on "false" epidurograms (demonstrating incorrect needle placement) include muscular staining and evidence of intravascular injection, inadvertent facet joint injection, dural puncture, subdural injection, and intraneural or intradiscal injection. ^©RSNA, 2016 An earlier incorrect version of this article appeared online. This article was corrected on December 22, 2016.

In-plane three-step needle insertion technique for ultrasound-guided continuous femoral nerve block after total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective review of 488 cases

BACKGROUND

Continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB) improves postoperative analgesia after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy and complications of our in-plane three-step needle insertion technique that was devised to reduce the risk of direct femoral nerve injury during CFNB in anesthetized patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 488 patients who had undergone TKA. Ultrasound (US)-guided CFNB was performed under general or spinal anesthesia using an in-plane, three-step needle insertion technique. The success rate and difficulties of catheter placement, clinical efficacy of analgesia, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Femoral catheters were placed with a 100% success rate. In 488 patients, real-time US imaging revealed easy separation of the fascia iliaca and the femoral nerve following injection of local anesthetic through a Tuohy needle. Verbal numerical rating scale pain scores (0-10) were 2.0 ± 1.2, 3.5 ± 1.9, 3.2 ± 1.7, 2.9 ± 1.3, and 2.5 ± 1.1 at 1, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h postoperatively. No femoral hematoma, femoral abscess, or neurologic complications, including paresthesia or neurologic deficits, were observed during the 8-week follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study suggests that an in-plane three-step needle insertion technique for CFNB may reduce the risk of femoral nerve injury in anesthetized patients.