Treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: the emerging role for radioembolization using yttrium-90

Co-relation of Portal Vein Tumour Thrombus Response With Survival Function Following Robotic Radiosurgery in Vascular Invasive Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background/aims

The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with robotic radiosurgery in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with macrovascular invasion (HCC-PVT).

Materials and methods

Patients with inoperable HCC-PVT, good performance score (PS0-1) and preserved liver function [up to Child-Pugh (CP) B7] were accrued after ethical and scientific committee approval [Clinical trial registry-India (CTRI): 2022/01/050234] for treatment on robotic radiosurgery (M6) and planned with Multiplan (iDMS V2.0). Triple-phase contrast computed tomography (CT) scan was performed for contouring, and gross tumour volume (GTV) included contrast-enhancing mass within main portal vein and adjacent parenchymal disease. Dose prescription was as per risk stratification protocol (22-50 Gy in 5 fractions) while achieving the constraints of mean liver dose <15 Gy, 800 cc liver <8 Gy and the duodenum max of <24 Gy). Response assessment was done at 2 months' follow-up for recanalization. Patient- and treatment-related factors were evaluated for influence in survival function.

Results

Between Jan 2017 and May 2022, 318 consecutive HCC with PVT patients were screened and 219 patients were accrued [male 92%, CP score: 5-7 90%, mean age: 63 years (38-85 yrs), Cancer of the Liver Italian Program <3: 84 (40%), 3-6117 (56%), infective aetiology 9.5%, performance status (PS): 0-37%; 1-56%]. Among 209 consecutive patients accrued for SBRT treatment (10 patients were excluded after accrual due to ascites and decompensation), 139 were evaluable for response assessment (>2 mo follow-up). At mean follow-up of 12.21 months (standard deviation: 10.66), 88 (63%) patients expired and 51 (36%) were alive. Eighty-two (59%) patients had recanalization of PVT (response), 57 (41%) patients did not recanalize and 28 (17%) had progressive/metastatic disease prior to response evaluation (<2 months). Mean overall survival (OS) in responders and non-responders were 18.4 [standard error (SE): 2.52] and 9.34 month (SE 0.81), respectively (P < 0.001). Mean survival in patients with PS0, PS1 and PS2 were 17, 11.7 and 9.7 months (P = 0.019), respectively. OS in partial recanalization, bland thrombus and complete recanalization was 12.4, 14.1 and 30.3 months, respectively (P-0.002). Adjuvant sorafenib, Barcelona Clinic Liver Classification stage, gender, age and RT dose did not influence response to treatment. Recanalization rate was higher in good PS patients (P-0.019). OS in patients with response to treatment, in those with no response to treatment, in those who are fit but not accrued and in those who are not suitable were 18.4, 9.34, 5.9 and 2.6 months, respectively (P-<0.001). Thirty-six of 139 patients (24%) had radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) [10 (7.2%) had classic RILD & 26 (19%) had non-classic RILD]. Derangement in CP score (CP score change) by more than 2 was seen in 30 (24%) within 2-month period after robotic radiosurgery. Eighteen (13%) had unplanned admissions, two patients required embolization due to fiducial-related bleeding and 20 (14%) had ascites, of which 9 (6%) patients required abdominocentesis.

Conclusion

PVT response or recanalization after SBRT is a statistically significant prognostic factor for survival function in HCC-PVT.

Prognostic factors influencing outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing selective internal radiation therapy

Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) has emerged as a viable endovascular treatment strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). According to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification, SIRT is currently recommended for early- and intermediate-stage HCC that is unsuitable for alternative locoregional therapies. Additionally, SIRT remains a recommended treatment for patients with advanced-stage HCC and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) without extrahepatic metastasis. Several studies have shown that SIRT is a versatile and promising treatment with a wide range of applications. Consequently, given its favourable characteristics in various scenarios, SIRT could be an encouraging treatment option for patients with HCC across different BCLC stages. Over the past decade, an increasing number of studies have focused on better understanding the prognostic factors associated with SIRT to identify patients who derive the most benefit from this treatment or to refine the optimal technical procedures of SIRT. Several variables can influence treatment decisions, with a growing emphasis on a personalised approach. This review, based on the literature, will focus on the prognostic factors associated with the effectiveness of radioembolization and related complications. By comprehensively analysing these factors, we aimed to provide a clearer understanding of how to optimise the use of SIRT in managing HCC patients, thereby enhancing outcomes across various clinical scenarios.

Vascular Interventions in Oncology

Vascular interventions are an important and established tool in the management of the oncology patient. The goal of these procedures may be curative, palliative or adjunctive in nature. Some of the common vascular interventions used in oncology include transarterial embolisation or chemoembolisation, selective internal radiation therapy, chemosaturation, venous access lines, superior vena cava stenting and portal vein embolisation. We provide an overview of the principles, technology and approach of vascular techniques for tumour therapy in both the arterial and venous systems. Arterial interventions are currently mainly used in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Transarterial embolisation, chemoembolisation and selective internal radiation therapy deliver targeted catheter-delivered treatments with the aim of reducing tumour burden, controlling tumour growth or increasing survival in patients not eligible for transplantation. Chemosaturation is a regional chemotherapy technique that delivers high doses of chemotherapy directly to the liver via the hepatic artery, while reducing the risks of systemic effects. Venous interventions are more adjunctive in nature. Venous access lines are used to provide a means of delivering chemotherapy and other medications directly into the bloodstream. Superior vena cava stenting is a palliative procedure that is used to relieve symptoms of superior vena cava obstruction. Portal vein embolisation is a procedure that allows hypertrophy of a healthy portion of the liver in preparation for liver resection. Interventional radiology-led vascular interventions play an essential part of cancer management. These procedures are minimally invasive and provide a safe and effective adjunct to traditional cancer treatment methods. Appropriate work-up and discussion of each patient-specific problem in a multidisciplinary setting with interventional radiology is essential to provide optimum patient-centred care.

Transcatheter Arterial Radioembolization-Induced Gastric Ulcer in an Excluded Stomach After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Transcatheter arterial radioembolization (TARE) is a common locoregional treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. It is associated with peptic ulcer disease in up to 5% of patients. A 70-year-old man with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and liver cirrhosis with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with TARE 6 months earlier was evaluated for continued melena and was found to have an ulcer in the excluded stomach. This was successfully treated with liquid proton pump inhibitor through gastrostomy tube to the excluded stomach. This represents a unique case of successful management of TARE-induced peptic ulcer disease in the excluded stomach of a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patient.

A Post-International Gastrointestinal Cancers' Conference (IGICC) Position Statements

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most prevalent liver tumor, is usually linked with chronic liver diseases, particularly cirrhosis. As per the 2020 statistics, this cancer ranks 6th in the list of most common cancers worldwide and is the third primary source of cancer-related deaths. Asia holds the record for the highest occurrence of HCC. HCC is found three times more frequently in men than in women. The primary risk factors for HCC include chronic viral infections, excessive alcohol intake, steatotic liver disease conditions, as well as genetic and family predispositions. Roughly 40-50% of patients are identified in the late stages of the disease. Recently, there have been significant advancements in the treatment methods for advanced HCC. The selection of treatment for HCC hinges on the stage of the disease and the patient's medical status. Factors such as pre-existing liver conditions, etiology, portal hypertension, and portal vein thrombosis need critical evaluation, monitoring, and appropriate treatment. Depending on the patient and the characteristics of the disease, liver resection, ablation, or transplantation may be deemed potentially curative. For inoperable lesions, arterially directed therapy might be an option, or systemic treatment might be deemed more suitable. In specific cases, the recommendation might extend to external beam radiation therapy. For all individuals, a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach should be adopted when considering HCC treatment options. The main treatment strategies for advanced HCC patients are typically combination treatments such as immunotherapy and anti-VEGFR inhibitor, or a combination of immunotherapy and immunotherapy where appropriate, as a first-line treatment. Furthermore, some TKIs and immune checkpoint inhibitors may be used as single agents in cases where patients are not fit for the combination therapies. As second-line treatments, some treatment agents have been reported and can be considered.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Surgical Management and Evolving Therapies

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer in men and the eighth most common cancer in women worldwide. It is also the second leading cause of cancer death worldwide, with 780,000 deaths in 2018. Seventy-two percent of HCC cases occur in Asia, 10% in Europe, 8% in Africa, 5% in North America, and 5% in Latin America (Singal et al. in J Hepatol 72(2):250-261, 2020 [1]).

Understanding the role of radiologists in complex treatment decisions for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary malignant tumor of the liver and represents a significant global health burden. Management of HCC can be challenging due to multiple factors, including variable expectations for treatment outcomes. Several treatment options are available, each with specific eligibility and ineligibility criteria, and are provided by a multidisciplinary team of specialists. Radiologists should be aware of the types of treatment options available, as well as the criteria guiding the development of individualized treatment plans. This awareness enables radiologists to contribute effectively to patient-centered multidisciplinary tumor boards for HCC and play a central role in reassessing care plans when the treatment response is deemed inadequate. This comprehensive review aims to equip radiologists with an overview of HCC staging systems, treatment options, and eligibility criteria. The review also discusses the significance of imaging in HCC diagnosis, treatment planning, and monitoring treatment response. Furthermore, we highlight the crucial branch points in the treatment decision-making process that depend on radiological interpretation.

Post-therapeutic microRNA-146a in liquid biopsies may determine prognosis in metastatic gastrointestinal cancer patients receiving 90Y-radioembolization

PURPOSE

The role of microRNA-146a (miR-146a) in defining the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) is well established. The aim of this study was to evaluate circulating miR-146a as an early prognostic marker of 90Y-radioembolization (90Y-RE) in metastatic liver cancer and to assess the correlation between circulating miR-146a and TIME cellular composition in distant, yet untreated metastases.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients with bilobar liver lesions from gastro-intestinal cancer underwent lobar 90Y-RE. Biopsy of contralateral lobe abscopal tumors was acquired at the onset of a second treatment session at a median of 21 days after initial RE, immediately prior to ablation therapy of the contralateral lobe tumor. miR-146a was measured by RT-qPCR in plasma collected 24 h before (T1) and 48 h after (T2) initial unilobar 90Y-RE. The level of miR-146a was correlated with the infiltration of CD4 + , CD8 + , FoxP3 T cells, CD163 + M2 macrophages and immune-exhausted T cells in the abscopal tumor tissue acquired before the second treatment session.

RESULTS

Plasma samples collected at T2 showed a higher concentration of miR-146a with respect to T1 in 43% of the patients (p = 0.002). In these patients, tumors revealed a pro-tumorigenic immune composition with enrichment of Tim3 + immune exhausted cells (p = 0.021), in combination with a higher infiltration of CD163 + M2 macrophages and a lower infiltration of CD8 + T cells. Patients with a higher level of miR-146a after 90Y-RE showed a trend to shorter OS (p = 0.055).

CONCLUSION

miR-146a may represent a novel prognostic biomarker for 90Y-radioembolization in metastatic liver cancer.

Postoperative adjuvant aspirin for patients with hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumor thrombus: An open-label, randomized controlled trial

Purpose

To compare the survival outcomes of postoperative adjuvant aspirin with surgery alone in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT).

Methods

From June 2013 to July 2015, an open-label, randomized controlled study was conducted in patients with resectable HBV-related HCC and PVTT. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo surgical resection and postoperative adjuvant aspirin (n = 40) or hepatectomy alone (n = 40). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). The secondary end points were time to recurrence of primary tumor (t-TTR) and time to recurrence of PVTT (p-TTR). The expression levels of COX1 and COX2 in surgical specimens of the aspirin group were correlated with patients' survival.

Results

The median OS were 16.2 and 13.4 months for the adjuvant aspirin and surgery alone groups, respectively. The median t-TTR were 5.3 and 3.2 months for the adjuvant aspirin and surgery alone groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in the OS and t-TTR between the two groups of patients (P = 0.078 and 0.336, respectively). The median p-TTR were 12.0 months and 5.4 months for the adjuvant aspirin group and the surgery alone group, respectively. Patients in the adjuvant aspirin group had markedly longer p-TTR (P = 0.001). Increased expressions of COX1 or COX2 in tumor tissues denoted better prognosis for patients receiving adjuvant aspirin.

Conclusion

For patients with resectable HBV-related HCC and PVTT, postoperative adjuvant aspirin significantly prolonged time to recurrence of PVTT than surgery alone. Expression of COX1 or COX2 may predict survival in these patients.

Multidisciplinary Taiwan consensus for the use of conventional TACE in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment

Developed in early 1980s, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with Lipiodol was adopted globally after large-scale randomized control trials and meta-analyses proving its effectiveness were completed. Also known as "conventional TACE" (cTACE), TACE is currently the first-line treatment for patients with unresectable intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and delivers both ischemic and cytotoxic effects to targeted tumors. Although new technology and clinical studies have contributed to a more comprehensive understanding of when and how to apply this widely-adopted therapeutic modality, some of these new findings and techniques have yet to be incorporated into a guideline appropriate for Taiwan. In addition, differences in the underlying liver pathologies and treatment practices for transcatheter embolization between Taiwan and other Asian or Western populations have not been adequately addressed, with significant variations in the cTACE protocols adopted in different parts of the world. These mainly revolve around the amount and type of chemotherapeutic agents used, the type of embolic materials, reliance on Lipiodol, and the degree of selectiveness in catheter positioning. Subsequently, interpreting and comparing results obtained from different centers in a systematic fashion remain difficult, even for experienced practitioners. To address these concerns, we convened a panel of experts specializing in different aspects of HCC treatment to devise modernized recommendations that reflect recent clinical experiences, as well as cTACE protocols which are tailored for use in Taiwan. The conclusions of this expert panel are described herein.

Favorable Prognostic Factors for Survival Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis After Hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate prognostic factors of recurrence and survival associated with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 161 patients with HCC with PVTT who underwent hepatectomy between January 2003 and January 2014 at the Asan Medical Center. Regression analyses were conducted to identify favorable predictive factors for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 15.9 months, while 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS was 65.0%, 38.4%, and 36.0%, respectively, and 1-year RFS was 25.5%. There were no significant differences in OS and RFS between the patients with portal vein invasion (Vp) 1-2 and Vp3-4 PVTT. Patients with intrahepatic recurrence had significantly better overall survival than patients with extrahepatic recurrence. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation were the most effective treatments for intrahepatic metastasis, and surgery was the most effective treatment for extrahepatic metastasis. On multivariate analysis, absence of esophageal varices, maximal tumor size < 5 cm, tumor location in single lobe, and anatomical resection were favorable prognostic factors for OS and R0 resection, and absence of microvascular invasion was a favorable prognostic factor for RFS.

CONCLUSION

The long-term outcome of patients with HCC with PVTT can be improved under consideration of favorable prognostic factors including absence of esophageal varices, maximal tumor size < 5 cm, tumor location in single lobe, and anatomical resection, R0 resection, and absence of microvascular invasion. In addition, recurrent HCC required aggressive management to prolong overall survival.

Portal vein tumor thrombosis in hepatocellular carcinoma: molecular mechanism and therapy

Portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT), a common complication of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), remains the bottleneck of the treatments. Liver cancer cells potentially experienced multi-steps during PVTT process, including cancer cells leave from cancer nest, migrate in extracellular matrix, invade the vascular barrier, and colonize in the portal vein. Accumulated evidences have revealed numerous of molecular mechanisms including genetic and epigenetic regulation, cancer stem cells, immunosuppressive microenvironment, hypoxia, et al. contributed to the PVTT formation. In this review, we discuss state-of-the-art PVTT research on the potential molecular mechanisms and experimental models. In addition, we summarize PVTT-associated clinical trials and current treatments for PVTT and suppose perspectives exploring the molecular mechanisms and improving PVTT-related treatment for the future.

A study of the clinical profile, predictors, prognostic features, and survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma having macroscopic portal vein tumor thrombosis

BACKGROUND

Macroscopic portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) is considered a negative prognostic factor in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. There is divergent opinion regarding management of these patients worldwide. We aimed to evaluate the clinical profile, predictors, prognostic features, and survival of patients of HCC with PVTT.

METHODS

Treatment-naïve HCC patients with and without PVTT were analyzed retrospectively using a prospectively accrued dataset. Patients with PVTT were further divided as per treatment groups for survival analysis.

RESULTS

Of 508 patients, 46.1% had radiological evidence of PVTT at presentation. On logistic regression, serum albumin (odds ratio [OR]=0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]= 0.44-0.96; p= 0.031); international normalized ratio (OR = 3.78,95% CI = 1.42-10.00; p=0.008); alpha-feto protein >400 ng/mL (OR=3.58, 95%CI = 2.00-6.40; p <0.001); size of largest tumor nodule >5 cm (OR =6.37, 95%CI =2.03-19.99; p =0.002); and male gender (OR =1.84, 95%CI = 1.01-3.33; p = 0.045) were independent predictors for PVTT. Patients with PVTT amenable to aggressive therapies had significantly better median overall survival (in months) as compared to those receiving sorafenib or best supportive care only (13.1, 3.9, and 1.8 respectively, p<0.0001). Treatment modality received (p<0.001) and extrahepatic metastasis (p=0.006) were independent predictors of mortality in these patients.

CONCLUSION

Size of largest tumor nodule >5 cm and alpha-fetoprotein >400 ng/mL are strongly associated with the presence of PVTT in patients with HCC. A multidisciplinary approach may identify a subgroup of patients who can be offered aggressive therapies like surgery and/or locoregional therapy with significant survival benefit.

Neoadjuvant Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is characterized by low resection and high postoperative recurrence rates, and conventional treatment strategies have failed to meet clinical needs. Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is widely employed in the routine management of several solid tumors because it increases resectability and reduces the rate of postoperative recurrence. However, a consensus has not been reached regarding the effects of NAT on HCC. As systemic therapy, particularly targeted therapy and immunotherapy, is given for HCC treatment, accumulating evidence shows that the "spring" of NAT for HCC is imminent. In the future, HCC researchers should focus on identifying biomarkers for treatment response, explore the mechanisms of resistance, and standardize the endpoints of NAT.

Paradigm shift in the treatment options of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is prevalent worldwide with suboptimal therapeutic outcomes. The advancement of therapeutic options and the development of new systemic therapies expand the armamentarium to tackle HCC. Treatment options should be provided based on the hierarchy of efficacy in a multidisciplinary perspective, instead of the traditional stage-guided scheme. In advanced HCC, lenvatinib has a comparable efficacy as sorafenib for the first-line therapy of HCC; while regorafenib, cabozantinib, and ramucirumab have been approved as second-line therapy after the failure of sorafenib. Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy prolongs response rate and survival and enables long-term cure. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is superior to sorafenib as the first-line therapy for advanced HCC. Several emerging regimens by the combination of various systemic therapies are currently under clinical trials. Systemic therapy may be used in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant or even as initial therapy for intermediate-stage HCC. The paradigm shift of HCC treatment will improve patient outcomes.

Role of Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET in Interventional Radiology

Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET has expanding applications in the field of interventional radiology. FDG-PET provides both qualitative and quantitative assessments of malignancy, infection, and inflammation. These assessments can assist interventional radiologists in selecting the most appropriate treatment options for their oncology patients. FDG-PET is also useful for evaluating the response to interventional treatments and in predicting the prognosis of oncology patients. Finally, FDG-PET can assist the interventional radiologist in diagnosing and monitoring response to treatment of infection and inflammation. Nevertheless, there is a need for additional prospective studies to further establish the role of FDG-PET in these applications.

Bridging treatment prior to liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: radioembolization or transarterial chemoembolization?

BACKGROUND

In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, intraarterial therapies are regularly employed as a bridge to liver transplantation to prevent tumor progression during waiting time. Objective of this study was to compare HCC recurrence after liver transplantation following TACE or radioembolization bridging treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data on 131 consecutive HCC patients who underwent liver transplantation between January 2007 and December 2017 at our liver transplant center (radioembolization n = 44, TACE n = 87). Multivariable logistic regression and cox proportional hazard regression models were used to evaluate factors associated with tumor recurrence and post-transplant survival.

RESULTS

Between groups, patients were comparable with regards to age and gender. In the radioembolization group, Milan criteria for HCC were met significantly less frequently (20.5% vs. 65.5%, p < 0.0001). Patients in the radioembolization group required significantly fewer intraarterial treatments (1 [1-2] vs. 1 [1-7], p = 0.0007). On explant specimen, tumor differentiation, microvascular invasion and tumor necrosis were comparable between the groups. HCC recurrence and overall survival were similar between the groups. Multivariable analysis detected increasing recipient age, male gender, complete tumor necrosis and absence of microvascular invasion being independently associated with decreased odds for HCC recurrence. Increasing model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score and tumor recurrence were independently associated with increased odds of post-transplant death.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraarterial bridging treatment leading to tumor necrosis may not only prevent waitlist drop-out but also facilitate long-term successful liver transplantation in HCC patients. Both radioembolization and TACE represent potent treatment strategies.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy plus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma patients with portal vein tumour thrombus: A meta-analysis

Background

The efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) plus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) versus SBRT or TACE alone(monotherapy) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumour thrombus (PVTT) remains controversial. This meta-analysis was performed to provide more powerful evidence for clinical strategies in inoperable HCC with PVTT.

Methods

We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China Biology Medicine (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP Journal Integration Platform (VIP), and WanFang databases for eligible studies. We pooled the results of 1- and 2-year overall survival rates (OSRs), objective response rates (ORRs), and adverse events (AEs) between the two groups and performed a subgroup meta-analysis for study type, control group, treatment order, and the interval between SBRT and TACE.

Results

Nine studies with 10 cohorts involving 938 patients were included in our meta-analysis. SBRT plus TACE yielded significantly higher 1-year OSR (RR, 1.52[95% CI, 1.33–1.74]), 2-year OSR (RR, 2.00 [95% CI: 1.48–2.70]), ORR (RR = 1.22 [95% CI, 1.08–1.37]), and a lower progression disease (PD) rate (RR = 0.45 [95% CI:0.26–0.79]) than monotherapy. No significant differences were detected in CR, PR, SD, or AEs between the two groups. Subgroup analysis regarding study type, control group, and treatment order indicated that compared with monotherapy, the combination of SBRT with TACE was associated with an increase in 1- and 2-year OSRs but not in ORR. In regard to the interval between SBRT and TACE, subgroup analysis found that the combination therapy for patients with an SBRT-TACE interval <28 days was preferable to monotherapy in the 1- and 2-year OSRs, and ORR. However, for patients with an SBRT-TACE interval ≥28 days, no obvious distinctions were observed in the 1-year OSR, 2-year OSR, or ORR between the two groups.

Conclusion

The combination of SBRT with TACE appears to be better than monotherapy in treating HCC with PVTT and should be recommended for inoperable HCC patients with PVTT.

Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Hypofractionated Ablative Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Tumor Thrombus Extending to the Right Atrium

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) presenting with tumor thrombus (TT) and inferior vena cava (IVC)/right atrium (RA) infringement point to an advanced-stage disease that is deemed inoperable. Stereotactic body radiotherapy is an emerging treatment option for this group of patients with promising outcomes in recent studies that are comparable to conventional treatment methods, namely, transarterial chemoembolization and transarterial radioembolization. Here, we report a case of HCC with RA extension through the IVC. The patient was referred to our clinic for treatment options, and he was found suitable for magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT). We treated the patient with MRgRT in five fractions to a total dose of 40 Gray. The tumor was tracked during the treatment sessions, and adaptive treatment planning was performed before each fraction. The patient tolerated the treatment well with no acute grade 3-4 toxicities. The last follow-up showed that the patient had a complete biochemical response and is now a candidate for an orthotopic liver transplant. To our knowledge, this report is the first to document the MRgRT treatment of an HCC with TT and RA extension. MRgRT is safe and feasible for this patient group and can be an effective bridging therapy for liver transplants.

Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation After Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Portal Vein Tumoral Thrombosis: A Pilot Study

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumoral thrombosis (PVTT) represents a major concern especially in the field of deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). However, when receiving transarterial radioembolization (TARE), a considerable percentage of such patients are able to achieve a radiologic complete response with adequate survival rates. In this pilot prospective study, we evaluated the effect of TARE in downstaging HCC patients with PVTT to meet criteria for DDLT. Between May 2013 and November 2016, patients were evaluated to be enrolled into our "Superdownstaging" protocol. Patients received yttrium-90 TARE and were enlisted for DDLT in case of complete and sustained (6 months) radiological response. Patients with tumor thrombus in the main trunk and/or in the contralateral portal vein branch were excluded. TARE was effective in downstaging and receiving DDLT in 5/17 patients (29.4%). The 5-year overall survival was significantly higher in patients who underwent DDLT compared with those who were not transplanted (60.0% versus 0.0%, P = 0.03). Three out of 5 patients developed recurrence within 1 year after LT. The current series showed a clear survival gain in those patients who were able to receive DDLT after TARE but careful selection for DDLT is however advised.

The characteristics of patients with macrovascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma: when East meets West

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prevalence and extension of macrovascular invasion (MaVI) in a large cohort of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients and analyze the association between MaVI and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

From 2011 to 2018, 2540 patients with newly diagnosed HCC who were managed in our institution were enrolled in this retrospective study. Tumor invasion of the intrahepatic branches of the portal or hepatic veins was defined as peripheral MaVI. Tumor invasion of the main portal vein or inferior vena cava was defined as central MaVI.

RESULTS

MaVI prevalence was 16.2% (n = 411). Among patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C and Child-Pugh class A, 165 patients presented with peripheral MaVI and 89 patients with central MaVI. The median OS was 13.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.4-15.4) in the peripheral MaVI group and 6.6 months (95% CI: 3.6-9.5) in the central MaVI group (p < 0.001). In patients with BCLC stage C and Child-Pugh class B or BCLC stage D, 68 patients presented with peripheral MaVI and 89 patients with central MaVI. The median OS was 3.6 months (95% CI: 3.1-4.2) in the peripheral MaVI group and 2.8 months (95% CI: 2.1-3.4) in the central MaVI group (p = 0.674).

CONCLUSION

The extension of MaVI significantly affected patient survival only in those with BCLC stage C and Child-Pugh class A. In patients with BCLC stage C and Child-Pugh class B or BCLC stage D, survival was poor irrespective of MaVI status.

The Progress in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of most prevalent cancer and is a serious healthcare issue worldwide. Portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is a frequent complication and remains as the blockage in the treatment of HCC with high recurrence rate and poor prognosis. There is still no global consensus or standard guideline on the management of HCC with PVTT. In western countries, Sorafenib and Lenvatinib are recommended as the first-line treatment options for HCC patients with PVTT where this condition is now regarded as BCLC Stage C regardless of PVTT types. However, there is growing evidence that supports the close relationship of the extent of PVTT to the prognosis of HCC. Besides the targeted therapy, more aggressive treatment modalities have been proposed and practiced in the clinic which may improve the prognosis of HCC patients with PVTT and prolong the patients’ survival time, such as transarterial chemoembolization, radiotherapy, hepatic resection, liver transplantation, and various combination therapies. Herein, we aim to review and summarize the advances in the treatment of HCC with PVTT.

Evolution of Radioembolization in Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Pictorial Review

Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium 90 has increasingly been performed to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). TARE was historically used as a palliative lobar therapy for patients with advanced HCC beyond surgical options, ablation, or transarterial chemoembolization, but recent advancements have led to its application across the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging paradigm. Newer techniques, termed radiation lobectomy and radiation segmentectomy, are being performed before liver resection to facilitate hypertrophy of the future liver remnant, before liver transplant to bridge or downstage to transplant, or as a definite curative treatment. Imaging assessment of therapeutic response to TARE is challenging as the intent of TARE is to deliver local high-dose radiation to tumors through microembolic microspheres, preserving blood flow to promote radiation injury to the tumor. Because of the microembolic nature, early imaging assessment after TARE cannot rely solely on changes in size. Knowledge of the evolving methods of TARE along with the tools to assess posttreatment imaging and response is essential to optimize TARE as a therapeutic option for patients with HCC. ^©RSNA, 2021.

Evaluation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment Response After Locoregional Therapy

Locoregional therapy (LRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma can be used alone or with other treatment modalities to reduce rates of progression, improve survival, or act as a bridge to cure. As the use of LRT expands, so too has the need for systems to evaluate treatment response, such as the World Health Organization and modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors systems and more recently, the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) treatment response algorithm (TRA). Early validation results for LI-RADS TRA have been promising, and as research accrues, the TRA is expected to evolve in the near future.

Consensus of Minimally Invasive and Multidisciplinary Comprehensive Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma - 2020 Guangzhou Recommendations

In China, the majority of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) result from long-term infection of hepatitis B. Pathologically, HCC is characterized by rich blood supply, multicentric origins, early vascular invasion and intrahepatic metastasis. Therefore, HCC is not a local disease but a systemic disease at the beginning of its occurrence. For this reason, a comprehensive treatment strategy should be adopted in the management of HCC, including local treatments (such as surgical resection, radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, chemical ablation and cryoablation, etc.), organ-level treatments [such as transcatheter arterial infusion of chemotherapy and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE)], and systemic treatments (such as immunotherapy, antiviral therapy and molecular targeted therapy, etc.). This consensus sets forth the minimally-invasive and multidisciplinary comprehensive guideline of HCC, focusing on the following eight aspects (1) using hepaticarteriography, CT hepatic arteriography (CTHA), CT arterial portography (CTAP), lipiodol CT (Lp-CT), TACE-CT to find the intrahepatic lesion and make precise staging (2) TACE combined with ablation or ablation as the first choice of treatment for early stage or small HCC, while other therapies are considered only when ablation is not applicable (3) infiltrating HCC should be regarded as an independent subtype of HCC (4) minimally-invasive comprehensive treatment could be adopted in treating metastatic lymph nodes (5) multi-level subdivision of M-staging should be used for individualized treatment and predicting prognosis (6) HCC with severe hepatic decompensation is the only candidate criterion for liver transplantation (7) bio-immunotherapy, traditional Chinese medicine therapy, antiviral therapy, and psychosocial and psychopharmacological interventions should be advocated through the whole course of HCC treatment (8) implementation of multicenter randomized controlled trials of minimally-invasive therapy versus surgery for early and intermediate stage HCC is recommended.

Cogent role of flavonoids as key orchestrators of chemoprevention of hepatocellular carcinoma: A review

Chemopreventive approaches with food-derived phytochemicals are progressively rising as a significant aspect of tumor management and control. Herein, we have showcased the major phytoconstituents belonging to the group of flavanoid, as anti-cancer agents used for the treatment and prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Sorafenib is the sole drug used for the treatment of advanced HCC, but its clinical application is limited because of its severe adverse effects and drug resistance. Diet-based chemoprevention seems to be the way forward for this disease of malignant nature. As HCC is derived from a chronic inflammatory milieu, the regular incorporation of bioactive phytochemicals in the diet will confer protection and prevent progression to hepatocarcinogenesis. Many preclinical studies proved that the health benefits of flavonoids confer cytotoxic potential against various types of cancers including hepatocellular carcinoma. As flavonoids with excellent safety profile are abundantly present in common vegetables and fruits, they can be better utilized for chemoprevention and chemosensitization in such chronic condition. This review highlights the plausible role of the eight most promising flavonoids (Curcumin, Kaempferol, Resveratrol, Quercetin, Silibinin, Baicalein, Galangin and Luteolin) as key orchestrators of chemoprevention in hepatocellular carcinoma with preclinical and clinical evidence. An attempt to address the challenges in its clinical translation is also included. This review also provides an insight into the close association of HCC and metabolic disorders which may further decipher the chemopreventive effect of dietary bioactive from a proof of concept to extensive clinical translation. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: According to GLOBOCAN 2020 database, it is estimated that 905,677 new cases of liver cancer and approximately 830,180 deaths related to that. The cancer incidence and mortality are almost similar as it is diagnosed at an advanced stage in patients where systemic drug therapy is the sole approach. Due to the emergence of multidrug resistance and drug-related toxicities, most of the patient can not adhere to the therapy regimen. Flavonoids are known to be a potential anticancer agent with an excellent safety profile. These are found to be effective preclinically against hepatocellular carcinoma through modulation of numerous pathways in hepatocarcinogenesis. But, the bioavailability issue, lack of well designed-validated clinical evidence, the possibility of food-drug interaction etc limit its clinical utility. The research inputs mainly to overcome pharmacokinetic issues along with suitable validation of efficacy and toxicity will be a critical point for establishing flavonoids as an effective, safe, affordable therapeutics.

Impact of Pharmaceutical Prophylaxis on Radiation-Induced Liver Disease Following Radioembolization

Simple Summary

Radioembolization has failed to prove survival benefit in randomized trials, and, depending on various factors including tumor biology, response rates may vary considerably. Studies showed positive correlations between survival and absorbed tumor dose. Therefore, increasing currently prescribed tumor doses may be favorable for improving patient outcomes. The dominant limiting factor for increasing RE dose prescriptions is the relatively low tolerance of liver parenchyma to radiation with the possible consequence of a radiation-induced liver disease. Advances in RILD prevention may help increasing tolerable radiation doses to improve patient outcomes. Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of post-therapeutic RILD-prophylaxis in a cohort of intensely pretreated liver metastatic breast cancer patients. The results of this study as well as pathophysiological considerations warrant further investigations of RILD prophylaxis to increase dose prescriptions in radioembolization.

Abstract

Background: Radioembolization (RE) with yttrium-90 (⁹⁰Y) resin microspheres yields heterogeneous response rates in with primary or secondary liver cancer. Radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) is a potentially life-threatening complication with higher prevalence in cirrhotics or patients exposed to previous chemotherapies. Advances in RILD prevention may help increasing tolerable radiation doses to improve patient outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of post-therapeutic RILD-prophylaxis in a cohort of intensely pretreated liver metastatic breast cancer patients; Methods: Ninety-three patients with liver metastases of breast cancer received RE between 2007 and 2016. All Patients received RILD prophylaxis for 8 weeks post-RE. From January 2014, RILD prophylaxis was changed from ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and prednisolone (standard prophylaxis [SP]; n = 59) to pentoxifylline (PTX), UDCA and low-dose low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (modified prophylaxis (MP); n = 34). The primary endpoint was toxicity including symptoms of RILD; Results: Dose exposure of normal liver parenchyma was higher in the modified vs. standard prophylaxis group (47.2 Gy (17.8–86.8) vs. 40.2 Gy (12.5–83.5), p = 0.017). All grade RILD events (mild: bilirubin ≥ 21 µmol/L (but <30 μmol/L); severe: (bilirubin ≥ 30 µmol/L and ascites)) were observed more frequently in the SP group than in the MP group, albeit without significance (7/59 vs. 1/34; p = 0.140). Severe RILD occurred in the SP group only (n = 2; p > 0.1). ALBI grade increased in 16.7% patients in the MP and in 27.1% patients in the SP group, respectively (group difference not significant); Conclusions: At established dose levels, mild or severe RILD events proved rare in our cohort. RILD prophylaxis with PTX, UDCA and LMWH appears to have an independent positive impact on OS in patients with metastatic breast cancer and may reduce the frequency and severity of RILD. Results of this study as well as pathophysiological considerations warrant further investigations of RILD prophylaxis presumably targeting combinations of anticoagulation (MP) and antiinflammation (SP) to increase dose prescriptions in radioembolization.

Strategy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma based on liver function and portal vein tumor thrombosis

AIM

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy resulted in better prognosis for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, some cases with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C disease still had poor prognosis. This study aimed to investigate prognosis and characteristics of patients with HCC treated with TKI based on liver function and the extent of portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT).

METHODS

Patients receiving TKI therapy (n = 345) were recruited retrospectively. Child-Pugh score and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score were used for assessment of liver function. The extent of PVTT was classified from Vp0 to Vp4. Radiotherapy or hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy were carried out as additional therapy to TKI. The end-point for this analysis was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 291 and 54 patients received sorafenib and lenvatinib as first-line TKI therapy, respectively. The median OS of patients treated with TKI were significantly stratified by ALBI grade (grade 1, 20.1 months; grade 2a, 16.3 months; grades 2b and 3, 9.8 months; P = 0.0003). The classification of PVTT significantly stratified the prognosis of patients treated with TKI (median OS: Vp0, 18.5 months; Vp1/2, 14.4 months; Vp3/4, 5.5 months; P < 0.0001). In the ALBI 2b/3 and Vp3/4 groups, the median OS of patients treated with TKI and additional therapies was significantly longer than those treated with TKI only (9.2 months vs.. 3.6 months; P = 0.0129).

CONCLUSION

Liver function and PVTT are useful for stratifying prognosis of HCC patients treated with TKI. The applicative classification could lead to appropriate therapy and better prognosis.

An overview in management of hepatocellular carcinoma in Hong Kong using the Hong Kong Liver Cancer (HKLC) staging system

In Hong Kong, liver cancer is the fifth most common cancer and the third most common cause of cancer deaths. The prevalence of hepatitis B is high in Hong Kong because of the high rate of hepatitis B virus infection, and chronic hepatitis B has remained the leading cause of hepatocellular carcinoma in the city, accounting for 80% of all cases in the period from 1992 to 2016. In view of the different etiologies of hepatocellular carcinoma around the world, a group of liver experts in Hong Kong developed the Hong Kong Liver Cancer staging system in order to provide more aggressive treatment guidance (predominantly a wider use of surgical resection) for Asian patients of hepatocellular carcinoma. In this article focussing on the Hong Kong Liver Cancer staging system, we briefly reviewed the screening criteria adopted in Hong Kong for liver resection, local ablation, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, transcatheter arterial radioembolization, stereotactic body radiation therapy, and systemic therapy.

Hepatocellular carcinoma Liver Imaging Reporting and Data Systems treatment response assessment: Lessons learned and future directions

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with rising clinical and economic burden as incidence increases. There are a multitude of evolving treatment options, including locoregional therapies which can be used alone, in combination with each other, or in combination with systemic therapy. These treatment options have shown to be effective in achieving remission, controlling tumor progression, improving disease free and overall survival in patients who cannot undergo resection and providing a bridge to transplant by debulking tumor burden to downstage patients. Following locoregional therapy (LRT), it is crucial to provide treatment response assessment to guide management and liver transplant candidacy. Therefore, Liver Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (LI-RADS) Treatment Response Algorithm (TRA) was created to provide a standardized assessment of HCC following LRT. LI-RADS TRA provides a step by step approach to evaluate each lesion independently for accurate tumor assessment. In this review, we provide an overview of different locoregional therapies for HCC, describe the expected post treatment imaging appearance following treatment, and review the LI-RADS TRA with guidance for its application in clinical practice. Unique to other publications, we will also review emerging literature supporting the use of LI-RADS for assessment of HCC treatment response after LRT.

Prediction of overall survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with Y-90 radioembolization by imaging response criteria

PURPOSE

To evaluate the potential of imaging criteria in predicting overall survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after a first transcatheter arterial yttrium-90 radioembolization (TARE) MATERIALS AND METHODS: From October 2013 to July 2017, 37 patients with HCC were retrospectively included. There were 34 men and 3 women with a mean age of 60.5±10.2 (SD) years (range: 32.7-78.9 years). Twenty-five patients (68%) were Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) C and 12 (32%) were BCLC B. Twenty-four primary index tumors (65%) were>5cm. Three radiologists evaluated tumor response on pre- and 4-7 months post-TARE magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography examinations, using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, modified RECIST (mRECIST), European Association for Study of the Liver (EASL), volumetric RECIST (vRECIST), quantitative EASL (qEASL) and the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System treatment response algorithm. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to compare responders and non-responders for each criterion. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) analysis were used to identify covariates associated with overall survival. Fleiss kappa test was used to assess interobserver agreement.

RESULTS

At multivariate analysis, RECIST 1.1 (HR: 0.26; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.09-0.75; P=0.01), mRECIST (HR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.08-0.59; P=0.003), EASL (HR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.07-0.63; P=0.005), and qEASL (HR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.12-0.80; P=0.02) showed a significant difference in overall survival between responders and nonresponders. RECIST 1.1 had the highest interobserver reproducibility.

CONCLUSION

RECIST and mRECIST seem to be the best compromise between reproducibility and ability to predict overall survival in patients with HCC treated with TARE.

The therapeutic benefits of combined sorafenib and transarterial chemoembolization for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Systemic therapy, such as sorafenib, has been used clinically to treat patients with advanced stage or Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system (BCLC) stage C hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of the study was to evaluate the therapeutic benefit of combined sorafenib and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in this group of patients.

METHODS

Data on patients with HCC at BCLC stage C from August 2012 to September 2017 were collected. Patients who were given sorafenib alone were classified as the monotherapy group and those taking sorafenib and TACE were classed as the combined therapy group.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients were enrolled. There were 65 and 53 patients in the monotherapy and the combined therapy group, respectively. The groups' general characteristics were similar. Compared with the monotherapy group the combined therapy group experienced prolonged time-to-progression (TTP) (mean 6.42 mo vs 3.63 mo, P = 0.003) and overall survival (OS) (mean 11.21 mo vs 5.98 mo, P = 0.001). A subgroup analysis found that patients with macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI) also had prolonged TTP and OS in the combined therapy group than the monotherapy group (mean TTP, 7.93 mo vs 3.43 mo, P = 0.007; mean OS, 13.41 mo vs 5.50 mo, P = 0.001), however, these significant differences did not exist for those with extrahepatic spread (EHS).

CONCLUSION

Combined sorafenib and TACE therapy has significant better outcomes than sorafenib alone in patients with stage C HCC, particularly those with MVI.

Imaging and implications of tumor thrombus in abdominal malignancies: reviewing the basics

Extension of tumor tissue within a vein is a recognized prognostic factor in abdominal malignancy because of its influence on tumor staging and selection of therapeutic management. With the advent of newer surgical techniques, and variable treatment strategies, imaging plays a crucial role in categorizing patients according to the tumor resectability and vascular reconstruction techniques during surgery. Understanding the clinical impact of tumor thrombus increases the awareness of the radiologist about the key findings in tumor staging and decision-making of surgical approach. Ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used individually and in combination to accurately assess the tumor thrombus. In our pictorial review, we will discuss the imaging findings and clinical consequences of tumor thrombosis in abdominal malignancies, including hepatocellular carcinoma, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, renal cancer, and adrenal cortical carcinoma.

Comparison of stereotactic body radiation therapy with and without sorafenib as treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a treatment option for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. However, the treatment outcomes for patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) remain poor. In this study, we evaluate the efficacy of SBRT with and or without sorafenib for advanced HCC with PVTT.Fifty four HCC patients with PVTT treated with SBRT using the Cyberknife system was retrospectively analyzed between January 2009 and June 2016. Of these, sorafenib combined with SBRT was administered to 18 patients and SBRT alone was administered to 36 patients. SBRT was designed to target the liver tumor and tumor thrombosis, with a radiation dose of 36 to 45 Gy (median 40 Gy) given in 3 to 5 fractions.The mean follow-up period for SBRT with sorafenib and SBRT alone was 13.22 ± 10.07 months and 15.33 ± 22.01 months, respectively. The response rate was comparable in both groups. Complete response and partial response rates were 77.77% for SBRT with sorafenib and 75.00% without sorafenib (P = .43). The median progression-free survival rate was 6 months (2-11 months) versus 3 months (2-5.6 months) (P = .24) and the 1- and 2-year progression-free survival rates were 25.7% and 15.2% versus 11.1% and 8.3% (P = .1225). The median, 1- and 2-year overall survival rates (OSR) were 12.5 months, 55.6% and 17.7% versus 7 months (5-13.5 months), 33.3% and 11.1% (P = .28), for SBRT with sorafenib versus SBRT alone groups, respectively.The result of our study shows that SBRT with sorafenib administered group resulted in a higher median, progression-free, and OSR for HCC patients with PVTT. However, the trends did not attain statistical significance. A large-scale randomized study is needed to assess the benefits of SBRT with sorafenib administration for patient with PVTT.

Downstaging unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma by radioembolization using 90-yttrium resin microspheres: a single center experience

Background

Only one third of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma can benefit from curative treatments at the time of first diagnosis. Tumor downstaging by radioembolization may enable initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to be treated with surgery lengthening survival.

Methods

From June 2011 through June 2014, all patients with a first diagnosis of unresectable HCC with intrahepatic portal vein thrombosis were treated in our center with radioembolization using 90-yttrium resin microspheres. A 3-year enrollment period and a 5-year follow-up were planned to adequately investigate survivals.

Results

Twenty-four patients were enrolled, five were downstaged to surgery, eight did not reach downstaging but achieved partial response or stable disease, and eleven showed HCC progression despite radioembolization. High tumor absorbed radiation doses (454 vs. 248 and 138 Gy, P=0.005) and low serum AFP levels (53 vs. 1,447 and 4,603 ng/mL, P=0.05) were the variables significantly associated with successful downstaging. Mean and median survivals were 54, 30 and 11 months and 70, 24 and 11 months in the three groups respectively. No severe side effects were registered.

Conclusions

In our center, about 20% of patients with locally advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma were successfully downstaged to surgery after radioembolization. This strategy increases survival and is associated with an excellent safety profile.

MRI Assessment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Local-Regional Therapy: A Comprehensive Review

Nearly 80% of cirrhotic patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are not eligible for surgical resection and instead undergo local-regional treatment. After therapy for HCC, patients undergo imaging surveillance to assess treatment efficacy and identify potential sites of progressive tumor elsewhere within the liver. Accurate interpretation of posttreatment imaging is essential for guiding further management decisions, and radiologists must understand expected treatment-specific imaging findings for each of the local-regional therapies. Of interest, expected imaging findings seen after radiation-based therapies (transarterial radioembolization and stereotactic body radiation therapy) are different than those seen after thermal ablation and transarterial chemoembolization. Given differences in expected posttreatment imaging findings, the current radiologic treatment response assessment algorithms used for HCC (modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors classification, European Association for the Study of Liver Diseases criteria, and Liver Imaging and Reporting Data System Treatment Response Algorithm) must be applied cautiously for radiation-based therapies in which persistent arterial phase hyperenhancement in the early posttreatment period is common and expected. This article will review the concept of tumor response assessment for HCC, the forms of local-regional therapy for HCC, and the expected posttreatment findings for each form of therapy. Keywords: Abdomen/GI, Liver, MR-Imaging, Treatment Effects, Tumor Response © RSNA, 2020.

Chinese Expert Consensus on Multidisciplinary Diagnosis and Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus (2018 Edition)

Portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is very common, and it plays a major role in the prognosis and clinical staging of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We have published the first version of the Consensus in 2016. Over the past several years, many new evidences for the treatment of PVTT become available especially for the advent of new targeted drugs which have further improved the prognosis of PVTT. So, the Chinese Association of Liver Cancer revised the 2016 version of consensus to adapt to the development of PVTT treatment. Future treatment strategies for HCC with PVTT in China would depend on new evidences from more future clinical trials.

Management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumour thrombosis: comparing east and west

Portal vein tumour thrombosis is common among patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Tremendous differences exist in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumour thrombosis between the east and the west, which derive from heterogeneities in its epidemiology, causes, pathology, comorbidities, prognosis, and other demographics. These divergences between the east and the west are not only caused by hepatocellular carcinoma itself, but are also affected by many variables including social factors, physician preferences, accessibility to costly or novel treatments, and reimbursement schemes. In this Review, we compare and contrast the management of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumour thrombosis in the east and in the west in terms of systemic and surgical treatments, radiotherapy, transcatheter arterial therapies, and portal vein revascularisation. We conclude that a personalised, data-driven approach to care with active management from a multidisciplinary team, as well as increased communication and collaboration between clinicians and researchers based in east and the west, could help to reduce the differences in management and optimise treatment strategies.

Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis: Beyond the known frontiers

Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the most frequent malignant tumors worldwide: Portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) occurs in about 35%-50% of patients and represents a strong negative prognostic factor, due to the increased risk of tumor spread into the bloodstream, leading to a high recurrence risk. For this reason, it is a contraindication to liver transplantation and in several prognostic scores sorafenib represents its standard of care, due to its antiangiogenetic action, although it can grant only a poor prolongation of life expectancy. Recent scientific evidences lead to consider PVTT as a complex anatomical and clinical condition, including a wide range of patients with different prognosis and new treatment possibilities according to the degree of portal system involvement, tumor biological aggressiveness, complications caused by portal hypertension, patient's clinical features and tolerance to antineoplastic treatments. The median survival has been reported to range between 2.7 and 4 mo in absence of therapy, but it can vary from 5 mo to 5 years, thus depicting an extremely variable scenario. For this reason, it is extremely important to focus on the most adequate strategy to be applied to each group of PVTT patients.

Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of portal vein tumor thrombus in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of a portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

One hundred fifty-four patients with histologically proven HCC underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was calculated, and the change in SUVmax (retention index, RI) was defined as the ratio of the increase in SUVmax between early and delayed scans to the SUVmax in the early scan. The circular region of interest was placed on the transaxial images according to the corresponding CT images. The final diagnoses of a PVTT were confirmed by histopathology.

RESULTS

Of the patients examined, 101 (65.6%) had no confirmed instances of a PVTT, whereas 53 (34.4%) had a confirmed PVTT. The sensitivity of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging was 62.3%, the specificity was 97.0%, the accuracy was 85.1%, the positive predictive value was 91.7%, and the negative predictive value was 83.1%. The SUVmax of the PVTT was 4.32 ± 1.96 and the SUVmax of the HCC lesions for these patients was 5.38 ± 2.79, but these differences were insignificant (t = 1.78, p = 0.08). For dual-time-point imaging, the SUV1 of the PVTT lesions was 3.75 ± 1.48, and SUV2 was 3.63 ± 1.41, but these differences were insignificant (t = 0.82, p = 0.42). The SUV1 of the HCC lesions was 4.47 ± 2.03, and the SUV2 was 4.90 ± 2.07, which were both also insignificant (t = - 1.81, p = 0.09). The RI of the PVTT lesions was - 2.05 ± 19.96%, and the RI of the HCC lesions was 11.87 ± 26.20%, with no significant differences between them (t = 1.58, p = 0.13).

CONCLUSIONS

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT may potentially improve the accurate diagnoses of a PVTT in patients with HCC.

Postoperative adjuvant IMRT for patients with HCC and portal vein tumor thrombus: An open-label randomized controlled trial

AIMS

To investigate the impact of postoperative intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) after partial hepatectomy +/- thrombectomy.

METHODS

From July 2013 to June 2016, consecutive patients with HCC and PVTT who underwent partial hepatectomy were randomly assigned to 2 groups: a control group and an adjuvant IMRT group. Survival outcomes in the 2 groups were studied.

RESULTS

The 52 patients in this study were equally randomized into 2 groups with comparable clinicopathological data. The median disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 9.1 ± 1.6 months, 18.9 ± 1.8 months for the adjuvant RT group and 4.1 ± 0.5 months, 10.8 ± 1.3 months for the control group, respectively. The 1-, 2- and 3-years overall survival rates were significantly better in the adjuvant IMRT group (76.9%, 19.2%, and 11.5%; respectively) than the control group (26.9%, 11.5% and 0%, respectively; p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative IMRT significantly improved the overall survival outcomes in patients with HCC and PVTT after partial hepatectomy +/- thrombectomy.

Yttrium-90 trans-arterial radioembolization in advanced-stage HCC: The impact of portal vein thrombosis on survival

PURPOSE

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is generally recognized as a prognostic factor in HCC. Our purpose is to assess and compare the survival of patients with PVT and without PVT, after Y-90 Trans-Arterial Radio-Embolization (TARE) of unresectable HCC, unresponsive to other loco-regional treatments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between November 2005 and November 2012, Y-90 resin-based TARE was performed in an IRB-approved prospective protocol, on 89 patients with unresectable HCC. 33/89 patients had PVT, the remaining 56 were resistant-to-cTACE or underwent TARE as a downstaging therapy. All patients were studied with Multi-Detector Computed Tomography (MDCT), angiography, 99mTc-MAA-scintigraphy and liver biopsy. Gastro-duodenal artery was embolized in most cases. Proton-Pump Inhibitors were administered to prevent gastritis and ulcers. χ2 test with Yates correction and log rank test were used to compare the two proportions and Kaplan-Meier survival curves, respectively.

RESULTS

The average activity administered was 1.7 ± 0.4 GBq. After the treatment, CTCAE grade 2 adverse events occurred in 46% (41/89) patients: in particular, fever and abdominal pain were found in 25 and 16 patients, respectively. No major side-effect was observed. According to mRECIST criteria, partial response or complete response was found in 70% of patient three months after the treatment, and in 90.5% nine months after the treatment. No significant difference was found in survival of patients with PVT compared to those without PVT (p-value = 0.672). A complete regression of PVT was observed in almost half patients (13/27, 48.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Portal vein invasion does not affect survival in advanced stage HCC-patients undergoing TARE using Y-90 resin-based microspheres. Y90 procedure is associated with regression of portal vein tumor thrombus.

Lipiodol deposition in portal vein tumour thrombus predicts treatment outcome in HCC patients after transarterial chemoembolisation

OBJECTIVE

To study lipiodol deposition in portal vein tumour thrombus (PVTT) in predicting the treatment outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients after transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data from 379 HCC patients with PVTT who underwent TACE as the initial treatment at Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center from January 2008 to December 2015. Patients were grouped by positive and negative lipiodol deposition based on the extent of lipiodol deposition in PVTT. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between negative and positive lipiodol deposition groups; furthermore, the value of the combinatorial evaluation of tumour responses and lipiodol deposition in PVTT in predicting prognosis was analysed in subgroup patients with stable disease (SD) after TACE.

RESULTS

Of the 379 patients, 264 (69.7%) had negative and 115 (30.3%) had positive lipiodol deposition in PVTT after TACE. Multivariate analysis identified positive lipiodol deposition in PVTT as an independent prognostic factor for favourable OS (p = 0.001). The median OS and PFS of negative and positive lipiodol deposition groups were 4.70 vs. 8.97 months (p = 0.001) and 3.1 months vs. 5.8 months (p < 0.001). In subgroup patients, the median OS and PFS of negative and positive lipiodol deposition groups were 4.7 months vs. 10.5 months (p < 0.001) and 3.5 months vs. 7.0 months (p < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The patients with positive lipiodol deposition in PVTT had a longer OS than those with negative lipiodol deposition. Furthermore, the positive lipiodol deposition in PVTT can further differentiate HCC patients with favourable prognosis from SD patients.

KEY POINTS

• Lipiodol deposition in PVTT is a prognostic indicator for HCC patients after TACE treatment. • Positive lipiodol deposition in PVTT is associated with a better prognosis.

Distinguishing Tumor From Bland Portal Vein Thrombus in Liver Transplant Candidates With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: the A-VENA Criteria

Differentiating tumor versus bland portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is essential in determining liver transplantation (LT) candidacy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to evaluate radiographic and clinical features that could noninvasively distinguish tumor PVT from bland PVT in HCC patients. Of 467 patients with HCC listed for LT from 2004 to 2011, 59 (12.6%) had PVT and 12 of 59 (20.3%) were deemed malignant. When comparing tumor versus bland PVT, thrombus enhancement was seen in 100% versus 8.5%; venous expansion was seen in 91.7% versus 10.6%; neovascularity was seen in 58.3% versus 2.1%; and being adjacent to HCC or prior treatment site was seen in 100% versus 21.3% (all P < 0.001). Combining these 4 imaging characteristics with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) >1000 ng/dL, the presence of ≥3 criteria best characterized tumor PVT with 100% sensitivity, 93.6% specificity, 80% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value. No LT recipients with presumed bland PVT had macrovascular invasion on explant. There were no differences in post-LT survival or HCC recurrence with bland PVT versus no PVT. In conclusion, we proposed noninvasive criteria that could accurately differentiate tumor PVT from bland PVT called A-VENA, which is based on the presence of ≥3 of the following: AFP >1000 ng/dL; venous expansion; thrombus enhancement; neovascularity; and adjacent to HCC. Use of the A-VENA criteria can assist in standardizing the evaluation of PVT in patients with HCC being considered for LT.

Clinical Case Panel: Treatment Alternatives for Inoperable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Surgical resection or liver transplantation offers the best chance of cure for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Unfortunately, most patients are not good candidates for liver resection due to locally advanced disease or compromised liver function. Moreover, liver transplantation waiting lists are long. For those cases not amenable for resection, a variety of local treatment modalities are available, such as image-guided ablative procedures, transarterial chemoembolization, and radioembolization, as well as external beam radiation. HCC presentation can vary considerably in size, number, and location of lesions. The management of inoperable HCC is, therefore, quite complex, and there is a lack of consensus on the best local treatment modality for each type tumor presentation. Here, we present 4 clinical case scenarios representative of commonly seen cases in the clinical setting, with different therapeutic perspectives from institutions with high expertise in the management of HCC.