Autoimmune pancreatitis: CT and MR characteristics

Diagnostic performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT in differentiating autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate the utility of F-18 FDG PET/CT in the non-invasive diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and differentiating it from pancreatic cancer (CaP) based on the amount and pattern of FDG uptake, as well as involvement of extra-pancreatic sites.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar. Only those studies that compared the findings of F-18 FDG PET/CT in terms of SUVmax, pattern of FDG uptake and presence of FDG-avid extra-pancreatic sites in both AIP and CaP were included. Studies were qualitatively assessed for risk of bias and publication bias. The diagnostic performance of parameters on PET/CT was examined through pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odd's ratio (DOR) and summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

Six studies were included with a total of 580 patients. 178 patients had AIP (Age 18-90 years, male, M: female, F ratio-8.4:1) and 402 patients had CaP (Age 22-88 years, M:F ratio-1.5:1). Type of AIP was reported in only 3 studies, with the included cases predominantly being type 1 AIP. All studies were retrospective with heterogeneity and a risk on patient selection and index test. The FDG uptake, expressed as SUVmax, was lower in AIP with a weighted mean difference of -3.11 (95% confidence interval, CI: -5.28 to -0.94). To diagnose AIP, the pooled sensitivity, specificity and DOR of diffuse pattern of FDG uptake were 0.59 (95% CI: 0.51-0.66), 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86-0.92) and 21.07 (95% CI: 5.07-88.32), respectively, with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.717 on SROC analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and DOR of FDG-avid extra pancreatic sites were 0.55 (95% CI: 0.45-0.65), 0.58 (95% CI: 0.52-0.64) and 2.33 (95% CI: 1.40-3.89), respectively, with an AUC of 0.632.

CONCLUSION

On F-18 FDG PET/CT, a pancreatic lesion of AIP has a lower SUVmax value than CaP. A diffuse pattern of FDG uptake and presence of an extra-pancreatic FDG-avid site are nearly 21 times and twice more likely in AIP than CaP, respectively.

Recent advances in IgG4-related autoimmune pancreatitis

The incidence of IgG4-related autoimmune pancreatitis (IgG4-AIP) is high in Asia and other countries, and unnecessary treatment is often undertaken due to both missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis in clinical practice. Although IgG4-AIP has attracted increasing attention, the details of IgG4-AIP pathogenesis and systemic immune response, including its relationship to tumor pathogenesis, are still unclear. In recent years, research on serum immunological detection, pathological features, clinical manifestations, diagnosis and treatment measures for IgG4-AIP has gradually increased. It is of great importance to summarize and discuss the latest progress regarding IgG4-AIP disease.

The effect of CT texture-based analysis using machine learning approaches on radiologists' performance in differentiating focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic duct carcinoma

PURPOSE

To develop a support vector machine (SVM) classifier using CT texture-based analysis in differentiating focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and pancreatic duct carcinoma (PD), and to assess the radiologists' diagnostic performance with or without SVM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 50 patients (20 patients with focal-type AIP and 30 patients with PD) who underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced CT. Sixty-two CT texture-based features were extracted from 2D images of the arterial and portal phase CTs. We conducted data compression and feature selections using principal component analysis (PCA) and produced the SVM classifier. Four readers participated in this observer performance study and the statistical significance of differences with and without the SVM was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

The SVM performance indicated a high performance in differentiating focal-type AIP and PD (AUC = 0.920). The AUC for all 4 readers increased significantly from 0.827 to 0.911 when using the SVM outputs (p = 0.010). The AUC for inexperienced readers increased significantly from 0.781 to 0.905 when using the SVM outputs (p = 0.310). The AUC for experienced readers increased from 0.875 to 0.912 when using the SVM outputs, however, there was no significant difference (p = 0.018).

CONCLUSION

The use of SVM classifier using CT texture-based features improved the diagnostic performance for differentiating focal-type AIP and PD on CT.

Primary hepatopancreatobiliary lymphoma: Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management

Primary hepatopancreatobiliary lymphoma (PHPBL) is extremely rare, which is defined as a lympho-proliferative disease confined to the hepatobiliary system and pancreas without any involvement of lymph nodes, bone marrow, or other organs. The clinical and imaging manifestations of PHPBL are variable and non-special, which are akin to those of tumors of the hepatobiliary and pancreatic systems. The overall prognosis and management of PHPBL differ from those of other tumors in the hepatobiliary system and pancreas. Proper diagnosis and prompt treatment are essential for improving clinical outcomes. Due to its rarity, the optimal treatment has not been issued. However, combination chemotherapy is considered as a standard treatment for them. This review provides an overview of the pathogenesis, diagnosis, pathology, and management of PHPBL and offers clinicians the diagnosis and management schedule for PHPBL.

Analysis of Clinical, Serological, and Imaging Features of Autoimmune Pancreatitis and a Case-Control Study on Prognostic Factors in Response to Hormone Therapy

Objective

The paper aimed to analyze the clinical, serological, and imaging features of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and the prognostic factors affecting hormone therapy.

Methods

A total of 106 patients with AIP enrolled in our hospital from March 2016 to August 2018 were treated with the hormone. The curative effect and recurrence were followed up. The patients were divided into relapse group (n = 42) and nonrelapse group (n = 64) according to the recurrence within 3 years after initial hormone therapy. The symptoms and signs, laboratory examination, and treatment were compared, and binary logistic regression was employed to explore the risk factors of AIP recurrence.

Results

Among the 106 patients included in this study, there were 78 males and 28 females, with a male-to-female ratio of 3:1. The average age of onset was 56.25 ± 8.87 years; the minimum age was 39 years; and the maximum age was 7 years. The main clinical symptoms were jaundice (67.92%), abdominal pain (48.11%), and abdominal distension (33.96%). In addition, there were symptoms of weight loss, nausea, vomiting, itching, and gray stool. Previous complications included 27.35% diabetes (29/106), 22.64% hypertension (24/106), 35.84% smoking (38/106), and 28.30% alcohol consumption (30/106). The serological characteristics were mainly the increase in serum IgG4 level; 92.45% (98/106) level was higher compared to the upper limit of normal value; the median level was 11.65 g/L; and the highest level was 35.79 g/L. A total of 88.67% (94/106) had an abnormal liver function. The results of imaging examination indicated that 58.49% (62/106) of extrapancreatic organs were involved, of which 46.22% (49/106) were the most common bile duct involvement. All the patients in the group reached a state of remission after hormone treatment. After the disease was relieved, the patients were followed up for 3 years. The recurrence rate was 39.62% (42/106), and the median time of recurrence (month) was 9 (range 2–36). The recurrence rates within 1, 2, and 3 years were 20.75%, 31.13%, and 39.62%, respectively. Among the recurrent patients, 52.38% (22/42) relapsed within 1 year, 78.57% (33/42) within 2 years, and 100.00% (42/42) within 3 years. Multivariate analysis showed that the short duration of glucocorticoid therapy and involvement of extrapancreatic organs were risk factors for relapse after glucocorticoid therapy in patients with type I AIP.

Conclusion

Type 1 AIP is more common in middle-aged and elderly men. The clinical symptoms of jaundice, abdominal pain, and abdominal distension are common, often accompanied by involvement of extrapancreatic organs, of which bile duct involvement is the most common. Type 1 AIP glucocorticoid treatment acceptance and disease remission are better, but the recurrence rate is higher after glucocorticoid treatment. Patients with a short time of glucocorticoid treatment and involvement of extrapancreatic organs may have a higher risk of recurrence.

MRI features for differentiation of autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The accurate differential diagnosis between autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is clinically important. We aimed to determine significant MRI features for differentiating AIP from PDAC, including assessment of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).

METHODS

We performed a systematic search using three databases. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was calculated using a bivariate random effects model to determine significant MRI features for differentiating AIP from PDAC. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated. The qualitative systematic review for DWI assessment was performed.

RESULTS

Of nine studies (775 patients), multiple main pancreatic duct (MPD) strictures, absence of upstream marked MPD dilatation, peripancreatic rim, and duct penetration sign were significant MRI features for differentiating AIP from PDAC. Absence of MPD dilatation had the highest pooled sensitivity (87%, 95% CI=68-96%), whereas peripancreatic rim had the highest pooled specificity (100%, 95% CI=88-100%). Of 12 studies evaluating DWI, seven reported statistically significant differences in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values between AIP and PDAC; however, four reported lower ADC values in AIP than in PDAC, but three reported the opposite result.

CONCLUSION

The four significant MRI features can be useful to differentiate AIP from PDAC, but DWI assessment might be limited.

Nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours misdiagnosed as autoimmune pancreatitis: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours are difficult to diagnose in the early stage of disease due to a lack of clinical symptoms, but they can rarely manifest as autoimmune pancreatitis. Autoimmune pancreatitis is an uncommon disease that may cause recurrent acute pancreatitis and is therefore often regarded as a special type of chronic pancreatitis.

CASE SUMMARY

We report a case of a 42-year-old female who had nonspecific upper abdominal pain for 4 years and radiological abnormalities of the pancreas that mimicked autoimmune pancreatitis. The symptoms and pancreatic imaging did not improve following 1 year of steroid therapy. Finally, pancreatic biopsy was performed through endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy, and nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours were ultimately diagnosed. Pancreatectomy has resolved her symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Therefore, the differentiation of nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours from autoimmune pancreatitis is very important, although it is rare. We propose that endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy should be performed if imaging characteristics are equivocal or the diagnosis is in question.

Biopsy diagnosis of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis: Does it bring a conclusion or confusion?

A biopsy-based diagnosis of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is now feasible via an endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy, but there are potential issues to address. The benefits of acquiring large tissue samples include more successful immunostaining for Immunoglobulin G4 and more identifications of storiform fibrosis, obliterative phlebitis, and the ductal lesions of type 1 AIP. However, storiform fibrosis may not be present in all the type 1 AIP lesions. An interobserver agreement study revealed only slight-to-moderate agreement among pathologists diagnosing the histological findings of type 1 AIP. Potential reasons for disagreement are the different time phases of the inflammation (which result in heterogeneous histological pictures), a focal appearance of the typical histological findings, and the different definitions used by pathologists. We have thus devised guidance for diagnosing type 1 AIP based on biopsy tissues. In this guidance, we define each histological finding of type 1 AIP, for example, storiform fibrosis as a swirling arrangement of inflammatory cells, spindle-shaped cells, and delicate collagens as a unit. The necessity of elastic stains for identifying obliterative phlebitis is explained, with examples of mimickers. Another important purpose of a biopsy in type 1 AIP cases is differentiation from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In this situation, acinar-ductal metaplasia observed in type 1 AIP is a mimicker of PDAC and should not be confused. For the resolution of potential disagreements among pathologists, a multi-disciplinary approach with the collaboration of clinicians, radiologists, and pathologists is necessary to avoid confusion.

Amendment of the Japanese consensus guidelines for autoimmune pancreatitis, 2020

In response to the latest knowledge and the amendment of the Japanese diagnostic criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) in 2018, the Japanese consensus guidelines for managing AIP in 2013 were required to be revised. Three committees [the professional committee for developing clinical questions (CQs) and statements by Japanese specialists; the expert panelist committee for rating statements by the modified Delphi method; and the evaluating committee of moderators] were organized. Twenty specialists in AIP extracted the specific clinical statements from a total of 5218 articles (1963-2019) from a search in PubMed and the Cochrane Library. The professional committee made 14, 9, 5, and 11 CQs and statements for the current concept and diagnosis, extra-pancreatic lesions, differential diagnosis, and treatment, respectively. The expert panelists regarded the statements as valid after a two-round modified Delphi approach with individually rating these clinical statements, in which a clinical statement receiving a median score greater than 7 on a 9-point scale from the panel was regarded as valid. After evaluation by the moderators, the amendment of the Japanese consensus guidelines for AIP has been proposed in 2020.

Use of MRI signal intensity ratio to differentiate between autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

AIM

To evaluate the accuracy of the lesion-to-erector spinae signal intensity ratio (SIR) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for distinguishing autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MRI data of 21 patients with AIP and 27 patients with PDA were analysed retrospectively, and the signal intensity in pancreatic lesions and erector spinae muscles at the same level on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), arterial phase (AP) imaging, and delayed phase (DP) imaging was measured for calculation of SIRs.

RESULTS

The mean SIRs of the pancreatic lesions and erector spinae from T2WI, AP, and DP images of AIP patients were 0.96, 1.27, and 1.42, respectively, while those of PDA patients were 1.35, 0.80, and 0.91, respectively. The differences in the SIRs between the AIP and PDA groups were statistically significant (p<0.001), with corresponding area under curve (AUC) values of 0.925, 0.906, and 0.961, respectively. The optimal cut-off values for the SIRs on T2WI, AP and DP images were 1.21, 1.01, and 1.08, respectively. SIR values < 1.21 on T2WI, >1.01 on AP imaging, and >1.08 on DP imaging identified AIP with sensitivities of 85.7%, 90.5%, and 90.5%, respectively, and specificities of 81.5%, 74.6%, and 81.5%, respectively. The AUC values for SIRs did not differ significantly between T2WI and DP imaging or AP and DP imaging (Z = 0.778, p=0.436; Z = 1.279, p=0.201).

CONCLUSION

The SIRs of pancreatic lesions and erector spinae on T2WI, AP, and DP images can be used to differentiate AIP from PDA.

Histological features of autoimmune pancreatitis and IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis with a correlation with imaging findings

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is characterized by a tumefactive inflammatory lesion resembling pancreatic carcinoma. Type 1 AIP is a pancreatic manifestation of IgG4-related disease characterized by unique histological features that can be identified on imaging. The capsule-like rim, which is a collar of hypertrophic lesion surrounding the pancreas, consists of lymphoplasmacytic infiltration and fibrosis, and storiform fibrosis is often identified. Hypertrophic lesions of various microscopic architectures such as the ducts, veins (obliterative phlebitis), arteries (periarteritis), and nerves are observed without parenchymal damage. The pancreatic lobules keep their contours, but the acinar cells are diminished and replaced by numerous inflammatory cells. These features provide clues to arrive at a diagnosis of type 1 AIP and to distinguish it from pancreatic carcinoma on imaging. In contrast, type 2 AIP is an epithelium-centered inflammation involving the ducts and lobules. Neutrophilic infiltration in the epithelium and/or lumens (granulocytic epithelial lesion) is a characteristic finding. Lobular swelling due to inflammation is the cause of pancreatic enlargement. IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis is histologically similar to the hypertrophic ductal lesion in type 1 AIP and characterized by wall thickening due to inflammation and luminal stenosis. The epithelium is intact, which is different from bile duct carcinomas and primary sclerosing cholangitis, the latter of which is characterized by inflammation targeting the epithelium. Although the histological features of type 1 AIP and IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis are unique, the biopsy diagnosis of these diseases has limitations, which should be recognized by clinicians.

Role of transabdominal ultrasound in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis

The most important thing in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is to suspect the possibility of AIP. In the acute phase, diffuse pancreatic enlargement is a highly specific finding of AIP compared to focal enlargement. Though the sensitivity is low, high-frequency transducers can detect the capsule-like rim sign and penetrating duct sign. Those findings are characteristic of AIP and useful for differential diagnosis with pancreatic carcinoma. In focal AIP, both contrast-enhanced US showing iso/hypervascularity and elastography showing increased stiffness not only in the focal enlargement but also in the surrounding parenchyma are also useful for differential diagnosis. Furthermore, changes over time after the two-week steroid trial, such as resolution or measurable reduction in parenchymal enlargement and a decrease in the mean shear-wave velocity on elastography, are also cardinal features of AIP. Since AIP is a pancreatic manifestation in immunoglobulin G4-related disease, evaluation of other organs, including the biliary tract and salivary glands, is particularly useful in focal AIP. A characteristic US finding of bile ducts is three-layered (high-low-high pattern) wall thickening with a markedly thickened middle layer. US can also detect wall thickening of bile ducts, which show no abnormalities on cholangiography. These findings are useful for differential diagnosis with cholangiocarcinoma. Multiple hypoechoic areas in submandibular glands are characteristic US findings of sialadenitis in type 1 AIP, and the sensitivity is higher than that of physical examination. US can further contribute to the diagnosis of AIP by employing elastography and contrast-enhanced US in addition to high-frequency transducers.

Imaging of inflammatory disease of the pancreas

Increasingly acute and chronic pancreatitis (AP and CP) are considered a continuum of a single entity. Nonetheless, if, after flare-up, the pancreas shows no residual inflammation, it is classified as AP. CP is characterised by a long cycle of worsening and waning glandular inflammation without the pancreas ever returning to its baseline structure or function. According to the International Consensus Guidelines on Early Chronic Pancreatitis, pancreatic inflammation must last at least 6 months before it can be labelled CP. The distinction is important because, unlike AP, CP can destroy endocrine and exocrine pancreatic function, emphasising the importance of early diagnosis. As typical AP can be diagnosed by clinical symptoms plus laboratory tests, imaging is usually reserved for those with recurrent, complicated or CP. Imaging typically starts with ultrasound and more frequently with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT). MRI and/or MR cholangiopancreatography can be used as a problem-solving tool to confirm indirect signs of pancreatic mass, differentiate between solid and cystic lesions, and to exclude pancreatic duct anomalies, as may occur with recurrent AP, or to visualise early signs of CP. MR cholangiopancreatography has replaced diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, ERCP, and/or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) remain necessary for transpapillary biliary or pancreatic duct stenting and transgastric cystic fluid drainage or pancreatic tissue sampling, respectively. Finally, positron emission tomography-MRI or positron emission tomography-CT are usually reserved for complicated cases and/or to search for extra pancreatic systemic manifestations. In this article, we discuss a broad spectrum of inflammatory pancreatic disorders and the utility of various modalities in diagnosing acute and chronic pancreatitis.

The role of apparent diffusion coefficient value in the diagnosis of localized type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis: differentiation from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and evaluation of response to steroids

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to clarify the usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in the differential diagnosis of localized autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and the evaluation of response to steroids.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed 40 patients with localized AIP and 71 patients with PDAC who underwent abdominal MRI with DWI (b = 0 and 1000 s/mm²). Their ADC values at the lesion sites and five MRI findings useful for diagnosing AIP were evaluated. In addition, ADC values before and after steroid therapy were compared in 28 patients with localized AIP.

RESULTS

The median ADC value was significantly lower for localized AIP than for PDAC (1.057 × 10^-3 vs 1.376 × 10^-3 mm²/s, P < 0.001). In the ROC curve analysis, the area under the curve was 0.957 and optimal cut-off value of ADC for differentiating localized AIP from PDAC was 1.188 × 10^-3 mm²/s. ADC value ≤ 1.188 × 10^-3 mm²/s showed the highest sensitivity and accuracy among the MRI findings (92.6% and 90.7%, respectively), and when combined with one or more other MRI findings, showed 96.3% specificity. The median ADC values before and after steroid therapy (mean 7.9 days) were 1.061 × 10^-3 and 1.340 × 10^-3 mm²/s, respectively, and ADC values were significantly elevated after steroid induction (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The measurement of ADC values was useful for the differential diagnosis of localized AIP and PDAC and for the early determination of the effect of steroid therapy.

Comparison of five-phase computed tomography images of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer: Emphasis on cases with atypical images

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

International consensus diagnostic criteria (ICDC) include characteristic images of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP); however, reports on atypical cases are increasing. The aims of this study were to compare CT findings between AIP and pancreatic cancer (PC), and to analyze type 1 AIPs showing atypical images.

METHODS

Five-phase CT images were compared between 80 type 1-AIP lesions and 80 size- and location-matched PCs in the case-control study. Atypical AIPs were diagnosed based on the four ICDC items.

RESULTS

ICDC items were recognized in most AIP lesions; pancreatic enlargement (87.7%), narrowing of the main pancreatic duct (98.8%), delayed enhancement (100%), and no marked upstream-duct dilation (97.5%). CT values of AIPs increased rapidly until the pancreatic phase and decreased afterward, while those of PCs gradually increased until the delayed phase (P < 0.0001). Atypical images were recognized in 14.8% of AIPs, commonly without pancreatic enlargement (18.5 mm) and sometimes mimicking intraductal neoplasms. The CT values and their ratios were different between atypical AIPs and size-matched PCs most significantly in the pancreatic phase, but similar in the delayed phase.

CONCLUSIONS

Ordinary type 1 AIPs can be diagnosed with the ICDC, but atypical AIPs represented a small fraction. "Delayed enhancement" is characteristic to ordinary AIPs, however, "pancreatic-phase enhancement" is more diagnostic for atypical AIPs.

Role of Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic cancer has the poorest prognosis among all cancers, and early diagnosis is essential for improving the prognosis. Along with radiologic modalities, such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), endoscopic modalities play an important role in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. This review evaluates the roles of two of those modalities, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. EUS can detect pancreatic cancer with higher sensitivity and has excellent sensitivity for the diagnosis of small pancreatic cancer that cannot be detected by other imaging modalities. EUS may be useful for the surveillance of pancreatic cancer in high-risk individuals. Contrast-enhanced EUS and EUS elastography are also useful for differentiating solid pancreatic tumors. In addition, EUS-guided fine needle aspiration shows excellent sensitivity and specificity, even for small pancreatic cancer, and is an essential examination method for the definitive pathological diagnosis and treatment decision strategy. On the other hand, ERCP is invasive and performed less frequently for the purpose of diagnosing pancreatic cancer. However, ERCP is essential in cases that require evaluation of pancreatic duct stricture that may be early pancreatic cancer or those that require differentiation from focal autoimmune pancreatitis.

Autoimmune pancreatitis: Current perspectives

Over the last two decades, our knowledge and understanding regarding the pathogenesis and biology of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) have improved tremendously. Type 1 AIP or IgG4-related pancreatitis (IgG4-RP) is now believed to be the prototype of the multisystemic IgG4-related disease. In view of clinical features like obstructive jaundice and mass-forming lesions in the pancreas in elderly men, type 1 AIP often mimics pancreatic cancer. IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis concomitantly involving the extrahepatic and intrahepatic biliary tree is the most common extrapancreatic involvement seen in up to 80% of these patients, which needs to distinguish from cholangiocarcinoma. Histology is characterised by lymphoplasmacytic inflammation, abundant IgG4 positive plasma cell infiltration, storiform fibrosis and obliterative phlebitis. Apart from histology, high serum IgG4 levels, pancreatic parenchymal and duct imaging findings and other organ involvement aid in diagnosis especially in cases where definitive histology is not evident. Also, these parameters lay the foundation of various diagnostic criteria proposed over last few years. On the contrary, histology alone is the mainstay for establishing diagnosis of idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis (IDCP) as it lacks any specific serological marker or imaging. Since both types of AIP respond dramatically to corticosteroid treatment, a biopsy is crucial to establish the preoperative diagnosis and to exclude malignancy so as to avoid unnecessary surgery. This review discusses the morphologic spectrum, treatment and prognosis of IgG4-RP and IDCP with an emphasis on approach to diagnosis with relevant histologic features, differential diagnoses and the challenges faced during biopsy interpretation.

Systemic Manifestations of Immunoglobulin G4-Related Disease: A Pictorial Essay

Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related disease is a systemic fibro-inflammatory disease characterized by pathologic findings in various organs. Imaging is critical for the diagnosis and treatment assessment of patients with IgG4-related disease. In this pictorial essay, we review the key features of multiple imaging modalities, typical pathologic findings, and differential diagnosis of IgG4-related disease. This systematic pictorial review can further our understanding of the broad-spectrum manifestations of this disease.

IgG4-related disease in the abdomen and pelvis: atypical findings, pitfalls, and mimics

IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a systemic, autoimmune, fibroinflammatory disease that can cause multi-organ damage. Although there have been many trials and studies since its recognition in 2003, there is still much that is unknown. Furthermore, IgG4-RD can affect any organ in the body and often has many mimics and alternative diagnoses, which can make for a challenging workup. Imaging plays a substantial role in the diagnosis of IgG4-RD and is often the first occasion where IgG4-RD comes into consideration. Thus, knowledge about the imaging findings of various manifestations of IgG4-RD can aid in the diagnosis and have a significant impact on patient management. In this article, we review the wide array of imaging findings, both typical and atypical, as well as possible mimics of IgG4-RD in the abdomen and pelvis.

Diagnostic imaging guide for autoimmune pancreatitis

The International Consensus Diagnosis Criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) has been published internationally for the diagnosis of AIP. However, since the revisions in 2006 and 2011, the Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for Autoimmune Pancreatitis 2018 have been published. The criteria were revised based the Clinical Diagnostic Criteria 2011, and included descriptions of characteristic imaging findings such as (1) pancreatic enlargement and (2) distinctive narrowing of the main pancreatic duct. In addition, pancreatic duct images obtained by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography as well as conventional endoscopic retrograde pancreatography were newly adopted. The guideline explains some characteristic imaging findings, but does not contain descriptions of the imaging methods, such as detailed imaging parameters and optimal timings of dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging. It is a matter of concern that imaging methods can vary from hospital to hospital. Although other characteristic findings have been reported, these findings were not described in the guideline. The present paper describes the imaging methods for obtaining optimal images and the characteristic imaging findings with the aim of standardizing image quality and improving diagnostic accuracy when radiologists diagnose AIP in actual clinical settings.

Pitfalls in the MDCT of pancreatic cancer: strategies for minimizing errors

Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is a widely used cross-sectional imaging modality for initial evaluation of patients with suspected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, diagnosis of PDAC can be challenging due to numerous pitfalls associated with image acquisition and interpretation, including technical factors, imaging features, and cognitive errors. Accurate diagnosis requires familiarity with these pitfalls, as these can be minimized using systematic strategies. Suboptimal acquisition protocols and other technical errors such as motion artifacts and incomplete anatomical coverage increase the risk of misdiagnosis. Interpretation of images can be challenging due to intrinsic tumor features (including small and isoenhancing masses, exophytic masses, subtle pancreatic duct irregularities, and diffuse tumor infiltration), presence of coexisting pathology (including chronic pancreatitis and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm), mimickers of PDAC (including focal fatty infiltration and focal pancreatitis), distracting findings, and satisfaction of search. Awareness of pitfalls associated with the diagnosis of PDAC along with the strategies to avoid them will help radiologists to minimize technical and interpretation errors. Cognizance and mitigation of these errors can lead to earlier PDAC diagnosis and ultimately improve patient prognosis.

A feasible CT feature to differentiate focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

To investigate whether the relative computed tomography (CT) value (rCT) of adjacent pancreatic parenchyma can distinguish focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis (fAIP) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

A total of 13 patients with fAIP and 20 patients with PDAC were included in this study. The rCT was calculated as the ratio of the CT value of adjacent pancreatic parenchyma to that of muscle. The diagnostic performance of rCT for discriminating fAIP from PDAC was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

Both fAIP and PDAC presented hyper-fibrosis histologically and delayed enhancement on CT examination. Moreover, the pancreatic parenchyma of fAIP presented serious inflammation. The mean rCT of the parenchyma was significantly lower in fAIP than in PDAC in all phases. The best diagnostic performance of the rCT value was found in the pancreatic phase, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.912, while the areas under the ROC curve of the portal and delayed phases were 0.812 and 0.754, respectively. The optimal cut-off value for distinguishing fAIP from PDAC was 1.62 in the pancreatic phase.

CONCLUSIONS

The rCT of the pancreatic parenchyma during the pancreatic phase may be a feasible CT feature for differentiating fAIP from PDAC.

Differentiation of Autoimmune Pancreatitis from Pancreatic Cancer Remains Challenging

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is an uncommon form of chronic pancreatitis. Whilst being corticosteroid responsive, AIP often masquerades radiologically as pancreatic neoplasia. Our aim is to appraise demographic, radiological and histological features in our cohort in order to differentiate AIP from pancreatic malignancy.

METHODS

Clinical, biochemical, histological and radiological details of all AIP patients 1997-2016 were analysed. The initial imaging was re-reviewed according to international guidelines by three blinded independent radiologists to evaluate features associated with autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.

RESULTS

There were a total of 45 patients: 25 in type 1 (55.5%), 14 type 2 (31.1%) and 6 AIP otherwise not specified (13.3%). The median (IQR) age was 57 (51-70) years. Thirty patients (66.6%) were male. Twenty-six patients (57.8%) had resection for suspected malignancy and one for symptomatic chronic pancreatitis. Three had histologically proven malignancy with concurrent AIP. Two patients died from recurrent pancreatic cancer following resection. Multidisciplinary team review based on radiology and clinical history dictated management. Resected patients (vs. non-resected group) were older (64 vs. 53, p = 0.003) and more frequently had co-existing autoimmune pathologies (22.2 vs. 55.6%, p = 0.022). Resected patients also presented with less classical radiological features of AIP, which are halo sign (0/25 vs. 3/17, p = 0.029) and loss of pancreatic clefts (18/25 vs. 17/17, p = 0.017). There were no differences in demographic features other than age.

CONCLUSION

Despite international guidelines for diagnosing AIP, differentiation from pancreatic cancer remains challenging. Resection remains an important treatment option in suspected cancer or where conservative treatment fails.

The Challenge of Autoimmune Pancreatitis: A Portrayal From the Pediatric Perspective

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a rare disorder characterized by prompt clinical response to corticosteroids. Lost tolerance to a variety of pancreatic antigens and subsequent development of autoantibodies are presumably involved in the initiation of AIP. Even pediatric patients have been reported with features of AIP, and awareness of this disorder is increasing among different clinicians. The terms lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis and idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis refer to the different histologic patterns of AIP, named type 1 and type 2, respectively. A combination of serologic, radiologic, and histologic investigations is needed to assess diagnosis of AIP and rule out neoplastic disorders. In addition, type 1 AIP can be distinguished by raised levels of serum immunoglobulin G4 and should be considered as part of systemic immunoglobulin G4-related disease. Conversely, type 2 AIP is frequently reported in younger patients and has less clear immune-mediated pathogenetic mechanisms. The natural history of pediatric AIP is obscure, and the diagnostic usefulness of different autoimmune abnormalities found in adults with AIP is limited for children. Tips to manage pediatric patients with AIP have been recently drafted through a set of recommendation statements. This review describes the current data about AIP and the pathogenic contribution of specific autoantibodies expressly in the pediatric population.

Imaging in chronic pancreatitis: State of the art review

Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is an important gastrointestinal cause of morbidity worldwide. It can severely impair the quality of life besides life-threatening acute and long-term complications. Pain and pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (leading to malnutrition) impact the quality of life. Acute complications include pseudocysts, pancreatic ascites, and vascular complications. Long-term complications are diabetes mellitus and pancreatic cancer. Early diagnosis of CP is crucial to alter the natural course of the disease. However, majority of the cases are diagnosed in the advanced stage. The role of various imaging techniques in the diagnosis of CP is discussed in this review.

Qualitative and quantitative evaluation for morphological changes of the splenic artery in autoimmune pancreatitis: novel imaging findings for differentiation from pancreatic adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To determine whether morphological changes can occur in the splenic artery (SPA) of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) cases, and if present, to compare them with those in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) to clarify any arterial morphological differences between AIP and PAC.

METHODS

A total of 101 AIP cases were included in this study. The presence or absence of morphological change in the SPA was assessed, using arterial phase axial computed tomography images. Subsequently, imaging parameters (imaging pattern, capsule-like rim, other organ involvement, splenic vein [SPV] stenosis, and SPA calcification) were compared between cases with and without morphological changes. Additionally, comparison analyses (visual SPA assessment and % minimal lumen diameter [MLD] stenosis) among normal pancreas, PAC, and AIP groups were performed using early arterial phase (EAP) reconstructed images.

RESULTS

In 25 (24.8%) AIP cases, marginal irregularities of the SPA were present. The presence of the capsule-like rim and SPV stenosis were significantly associated with the arterial morphological changes. All cases with morphological changes had a capsule-like rim. Visual assessment using EAP reconstructed images revealed irregularities of the SPA in 9 of 38 AIP cases (23.7%); however, arterial narrowing was not detected in any cases. % MLD stenosis in AIP group was significantly lower than that in PAC group (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although approximately one-quarter of AIP cases potentially demonstrate marginal irregularity in the SPA when it is surrounded by an apparent capsule-like rim, arterial luminal narrowing rarely occurs in contrast to PAC. These arterial findings can help to distinguish AIP from PAC.

The pancreatic and extrapancreatic manifestations of IgG4-related disease

The association between immunoglobulin IgG4 and autoimmune pancreatitis was first shown in 2001. Since then many previously established fibrosclerotic diseases demonstrating synchronous or metachronous multiorgan involvement have been included within the ambit of IgG4-related disease. Diagnostic criteria have been proposed involving 1) serum IgG4 level elevated beyond 135 mg/dL, 2) IgG4+ to IgG+ plasma cell ratio > 40% and >10 IgG4+ cells per high power field of biopsy sample and 3) a constellation of imaging features which involve a variety of organ systems. We present a pictorial essay demonstrating the spectrum of imaging findings for IgG4-related disease, including dacryosialadenitis, variety of renal lesions, tumefactive thickening of the extraocular muscles and orbital nerve, sclerosing cholangitis, and type I pancreatitis. Imaging plays an important role in diagnosis, screening for multiorgan involvement, and follow-up of the disease.

Management of Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is an IgG-4-related systemic disease that can manifest as a pancreatic disorder or another disorder of presumed autoimmune origin. Type 2 disease is typically characterized by absent IgG-4-positive cells. As patients often present with acute pancreatitis, obstructive jaundice, or pancreatic mass, it is imperative to exclude malignancy, a more common diagnosis. AIP may respond to corticosteroids, and has a strong association with other immune-mediated diseases. Recent literature suggests the benefit of immune-modulating therapy, including rituximab, although no consensus exists. This review covers the essentials of diagnosis, but focuses primarily on management of AIP.

Type 1 and Type 2 Autoimmune Pancreatitis: Distinctive Clinical and Pathological Features, But Are There Any Differences at Magnetic Resonance? Experience From a Referral Center

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate magnetic resonance imaging findings of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and to find radiological patterns that could differentiate type 1 and type 2 AIP.

METHODS

Eighty-four patients with diagnosis of AIP were enrolled. Image analysis included pancreatic signal intensity abnormalities, enhancement pattern, extrapancreatic involvement, and main pancreatic duct alterations.

RESULTS

Pancreatic parenchyma resulted in hypointensity on T1-weighted images in 65 (98.5%) of 66 cases in type 1 and in 17 (94.5%) of 18 in type 2 (P > 0.05) and in hyperintensity on T2-weighted images in 41 (62%) of 66 and in 15 (83.4%) of 18, respectively (P > 0.05). Lesions were hypovascular in 64 (97%) of 66 cases in type 1 and in 16 (88.9%) of 18 in type 2 with delayed contrast retention in 56 (84.8%) of 66 and in 17 (94.5%) of 18, respectively (P > 0.05). Autoimmune cholangitis was found in 29 (43.9%) of 66 patients with type 1 and in 3 (16.7%) of 18 with type 2 (P = 0.02); renal involvement was observed in 20 (30.3%) of 66 and 1 (5.5%) of 18, respectively (P = 0.02). Both subtypes presented with multiple stenoses (P > 0.05). Dilation of upstream duct was more frequent in type 1 (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Magnetic resonance imaging is useful in detecting extrapancreatic involvement, typically seen in type 1. Dilation of the upstream duct suggests type 1 AIP.

Diagnosis and Detection of Pancreatic Cancer

Computed tomography is the first-line imaging modality for suspected pancreatic cancer. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography is a second-line modality for suspected pancreatic cancer and is usually reserved for equivocal cases. Both computed tomography and MR are highly sensitive in the detection of pancreatic cancer, with up to 96% and 93.5% sensitivity, respectively. Computed tomography is superior to MR in the assessment of tumor resectability, with accuracy rates of up to 86.8% and 78.9%, respectively. Close attention to secondary signs of pancreatic cancer, such as pancreatic duct dilatation, abrupt pancreatic duct caliber change, and parenchymal atrophy, are critical in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Emerging techniques such as radiomics and molecular imaging have the potential of identifying malignant precursors and lead to earlier disease diagnosis. The results of these promising techniques need to be validated in larger clinical studies.

Autoimmune pancreatitis: Imaging features

Background and Objectives

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) remains a difficult disease to diagnose before treatment, particularly if presenting as a focal mass lesion. The purpose of this multicenter retrospective study is to analyze imaging features of histologically confirmed AIP to determine the additional diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CE-EUS), and elastography to B-mode features.

Patients and Methods

We report on a retrospective data collection of 60 histologically confirmed cases of AIP in comparison to 16 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinomas (PDAC). All CE (-E) US examinations were assessed by two independent readers in consensus. The role of CEUS and CE-EUS for pancreatic evaluation was defined according to the 2011 European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology guidelines.

Results

After injection of ultrasound (US) contrast agents, most AIP lesions displayed focal or diffuse isoenhancement (86.6%) in the arterial phase, while most of the PDAC lesions (93.7%) were hypoenhancing (P < 0.01). During the late phase, most AIP lesions were hyper-(65%) or iso-enhancing (35%), while most PDAC lesions were hypoenhancing (93.7%). CE-EUS was performed in a subset of ten patients and showed hyperenhancement in all AIP cases. Most focal AIP lesions (n = 27, 79.4%) were stiffer than the surrounding pancreatic parenchyma.

Conclusions

In this study, percutaneous and endoscopic contrast enhanced harmonic US techniques consistently revealed diffuse and focal types of AIP to have features consistent with vascularized lesions. Differentiation from the typically hypovascularized pancreatic adenocarcinoma was possible with CE (-E) US evaluation.

Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Can Be Used to Rule Out Malignancy in Autoimmune Pancreatitis Patients

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to review the suitability of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for ruling out malignancy in autoimmune pancreatitis patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 40 autoimmune pancreatitis patients (type 1:37 patients; type 2: two patients; possible autoimmune pancreatitis: one patient) who received EUS-FNA. Among the 40 autoimmune pancreatitis patients, 34 were not histopathologically diagnosed with autoimmune pancreatitis by EUS-FNA, and they were followed up for more than 6 months in our hospital. Moreover, 14 pancreatic cancer patients who were not diagnosed by EUS-FNA were selected as a control group. These 14 patients constituted 3.9% of the 360 pancreatic cancer patients who received EUS-FNA. We evaluated the prognoses of the 34 autoimmune pancreatitis patients and the clinical differences between these 34 autoimmune pancreatitis patients and the 14 pancreatic cancer patients.

RESULTS

All 34 autoimmune pancreatitis patients showed reduced pancreatic swelling. The main pancreatic duct dilation ( > 3 mm), the diameter of the main pancreatic duct, the capsule-like rim sign, and serum CA19-9 levels were significantly different between the autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer patients (2.9% versus 69.2%, P < .01; 1.7 ± 1.6 mm versus 6.8 ± 5.0 mm, P < .01; 79.4% versus 0%, P < .01; 41.4 ± 79.0 U/mL versus 2079.1 ± 275.3 U/mL, P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Almost all pancreatic cancers can be diagnosed by EUS-FNA. Furthermore, other clinical characteristics of pancreatic cancer undiagnosed by EUS-FNA were different from autoimmune pancreatitis undiagnosed by EUS-FNA. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided FNA can be used to rule out malignancy in autoimmune pancreatitis patients.

[Hepatopancreaticobiliary diseases in IgG4-associated autoimmune diseases]

BACKGROUND

IgG4-related diseases are rare systemic multiorgan diseases and can thus affect any organ system. The incidence of diagnosis has significantly increased due to increasing awareness.

OBJECTIVE

In the abdomen the hepatopancreaticobiliary system provides an essential organ system for the expression of IgG4-associated autoimmune diseases. The focus here is autoimmune pancreatitis type 1 but IgG4-associated sclerosing cholangitis and IgG4-associated hepatopathy, which can also occur in combination are less well-known.

METHODS

Various mostly Asiatic, histologically-based diagnostic systems, such as HISORt or international consensus diagnostic criteria (ICDC) are available for the diagnostics of hepatopancreaticobiliary IgG4-related autoimmune diseases, in which imaging techniques playing an increasingly important role.

RESULTS

In addition to generalized organ swelling further morphological and also functional imaging criteria have become increasingly well-known for autoimmune pancreatitis, such as late enhancement or the imaging response to steroid therapy. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERP) can provide valuable information for the diagnostics of IgG4-related diseases in the hepatopancreaticobiliary system.

CONCLUSION

IgG4-related autoimmune diseases of the hepatopancreaticobiliary system are a rare group of diseases in which increasing knowledge of the radiological appearance also leads to an increasingly frequency of diagnosis. IgG4-related diseases must be distinguished from non-necrotizing pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer, which is often difficult but has significant therapeutic consequences for the patients.

Prediction of pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy by preoperative dynamic CT and fecal elastase-1 levels

Objective

To validate preoperative dynamic CT and fecal elastase-1 level in predicting the development of pancreatic fistulae after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Materials and methods

For 146 consecutive patients, CT attenuation values of the nontumorous pancreatic parenchyma were retrospectively measured on precontrast, arterial and equilibrium phase images for calculation of enhancement ratios. CT enhancement ratios and preoperative fecal elastase-1 levels were correlated with the development of pancreatic fistulae using independent t-test, logistic regression models, ROC analysis, Youden method and tree analysis.

Results

The mean value of enhancement ratio on equilibrium phase was significantly higher (p = 0.001) in the patients without pancreatic fistula (n = 107; 2.26±3.63) than in the patients with pancreatic fistula (n = 39; 1.04±0.51); in the logistic regression analyses, it was significant predictor for the development of pancreatic fistulae (odds ratio = 0.243, p = 0.002). The mean preoperative fecal elastase-1 levels were higher (odds ratio = 1.003, p = 0.034) in the pancreatic fistula patients than other patients, but there were no significant differences in the areas under the curve between the prediction values of CT enhancement ratios and fecal elastase-1 combined and those of CT enhancement ratios alone (P = 0.897, p = 0.917) on ROC curve analysis. Tree analysis revealed that the CT enhancement ratio was more powerful predictor of pancreatic fistula than fecal elastase-1 levels.

Conclusion

The preoperative CT enhancement ratio of pancreas acquired at equilibrium phase regardless of combination with fecal elastase-1 levels might be a useful predictor of the risk of developing a pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy.

From Pathogenesis, Clinical Manifestation, and Diagnosis to Treatment: An Overview on Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a special type of chronic pancreatitis which is autoimmune mediated. The international consensus diagnostic criteria (ICDC) 2011 proposed two types of AIP: type I is associated with histological pattern of lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (LPSP), characterized by serum IgG4 elevation, whereas type 2 is named idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis (IDCP), with granulocytic epithelial lesion (GEL) and immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) negative. The pathogenic mechanism is unclear now; based on genetic factors, disease specific or related antigens, innate and adaptive immunity may be involved. The most common clinical manifestations of AIP are obstructive jaundice and upper abdominal pain. The diagnosis can be made by a combination of parenchymal and ductal imaging, serum IgG4 concentrations, pancreatic histology, extrapancreatic disease, and glucocorticoid responsiveness according to ICDC 2011. Because of the clinical and imaging similarities with pancreatic cancer, general work-up should be done carefully to exclude pancreatic malignant tumor before empirical trial of glucocorticoid treatment. Glucocorticoid is the most common drug for AIP to induce remission, while there still exists controversy on steroid maintenance and treatment for relapse. Further studies should be done to identify more specific serum biomarkers for AIP, the pathogenic mechanisms, and the treatment for relapse.

Imaging features of immunoglobulin G4-related disease

Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a fibroinflammatory condition that was first recognised as a systemic disease in 2003, when patients with autoimmune pancreatitis were found to have extrapancreatic manifestations. Since 2003, IgG4-RD has been described in a diverse range of other organs including the biliary tree, orbits, lacrimal glands, salivary glands, lungs, kidneys, aorta, retroperitoneum, lymph nodes, pachymeninges, prostate and pituitary gland. The disease frequently occurs in the absence of pancreatic involvement. The imaging manifestations of IgG4-RD are broad and variable depending on the organ involved. The majority of individual organ appearances are non-specific and differentiation between IgG4-RD and potentially more serious conditions is not usually possible based on radiological findings in one organ alone. However, if there are simultaneous findings typical of IgG4-RD in multiple organs then this is a key diagnostic clue and IgG4-RD should be considered as one of the main differentials. This review article examines the spectrum of imaging appearances of IgG4-RD. Increased awareness of the spectrum of radiological appearances of IgG4-RD throughout the body and subsequent consideration of the condition may potentially avoid invasive treatment and lead to more prompt corticosteroid therapy.

Immune-related pancreatitis secondary to nivolumab in a patient with recurrent lung adenocarcinoma: A case report

Immune checkpoint inhibitor is a verified standard of care as a second-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Management of immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) is crucial for ensuring patient safety. However, less frequent irAEs may result in complications. Here, we report a patient with recurrent lung adenocarcinoma who was treated with nivolumab and developed immune-related pancreatitis. A 66-year-old Japanese female with recurrent lung adenocarcinoma and metastatic lymph nodes presented with anorexia, vomiting, and back pain on day 18 of two cycles of nivolumab. Laboratory data demonstrated a grade 3 elevation of serum amylase and lipase levels. Initially, no abnormality could be detected on computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), or the Gallium scan. The patient was treated with high-dose prednisone, resulting in gradual improvement of symptoms and laboratory data. A follow-up MRCP revealed a swollen pancreas and pancreatic inflammation. Immune-related pancreatitis is a rare type of nivolumab-induced irAE that shows no significant changes on radiologic imaging, except for a swollen pancreas on CT, and can be suppressed using high-dose prednisone.

Autoimmune pancreatitis

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a rare, distinct and increasingly recognized form of pancreatitis which has autoimmune features. The international consensus diagnostic criteria (ICDC) for AIP recently described two subtypes; type 1[lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (LPSP)] and type 2 [idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis (IDCP) or AIP with granulocytic epithelial lesion (GEL)]. Type 1 is the more common form of the disease worldwide and current understanding suggests that it is a pancreatic manifestation of immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD). In contrast, type 2 AIP is a pancreas-specific disease not associated with IgG4 and mostly without the overt extra-pancreatic organ involvement seen in type 1. The pathogenesis of AIP is not completely understood and its clinical presentation is non-specific. It shares overlapping features with more sinister pathologies such as cancer of the pancreas, which continues to pose a diagnostic challenge for clinicians. The diagnostic criteria requires a variable combination of histopathological, imaging and serological features in the presence of typical extrapancreatic lesions and a predictable response to steroids.

Differentiating Mass-Forming Autoimmune Pancreatitis From Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma on the Basis of Contrast-Enhanced MRI and DWI Findings

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess value of contrast-enhanced MRI, MRCP, and DWI for differentiating mass-forming autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 15 patients with mass-forming AIP and 79 with PDAC who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with DWI and MRCP. Two radiologists evaluated the MRI findings in consensus. Statistically significant imaging findings were identified through univariate and multivariate analyses, and their diagnostic performance for predicting mass-forming AIP was analyzed.

RESULTS

In the univariate analysis, multiplicity, similar or high signal intensity on portal phase and 3- and 20-minute delayed phase images, homogeneous enhancement, no peripancreatic fat infiltration, no internal cystic or necrotic portion, capsulelike rim, no upstream pancreatitis, no vascular invasion, and duct penetrating sign were more frequently observed (p < 0.05) in mass-forming AIP. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value was also significantly lower for mass-forming AIP than for PDAC (0.96 ± 0.14 versus 1.13 ± 0.23 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s; p < 0.001). The optimal cutoff value of ADC for differentiating mass-forming AIP from PDAC was 0.9407 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s. In multivariate analysis, homogeneous enhancement (p = 0.001), duct penetrating sign (p < 0.001), and ADC value less than 0.9407 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s (p < 0.001) were significant for differentiating mass-forming AIP from PDAC. When two of these three criteria were combined, 80% (12/15) of mass-forming AIPs were identified with specificity of 98.7%. When all three criteria were satisfied, specificity was 100%.

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced MRI with MRCP and DWI may be helpful for differentiating mass-forming AIP from PDAC.

Pancreatic and Extrapancreatic Features in Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) accounts for approximately 5% of chronic pancreatitis cases and is an important consideration in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic pathologies. The underlying pathophysiology of AIP is thought to involve lymphocyte infiltration and associated sclerosis. Although AIP is a benign condition that is treatable with corticosteroids, it can have imaging and clinical findings indistinguishable from pancreatic cancer. As such, the radiologist plays an important management role in distinguishing AIP from more sinister conditions. In addition, there are several extrapancreatic imaging findings in the context of AIP that have been recently described. This pictorial review outlines both the pancreatic and extrapancreatic imaging features in AIP and the response to steroid therapy. Important imaging features that allow AIP to be differentiated from other pancreatic pathology, including adenocarcinoma, lymphoma, and acute pancreatitis will be discussed.

Nononcologic applications of diffusion-weighted imaging in the gastrointestinal system

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to review infectious, inflammatory, and auto-immune-mediated processes in the gastrointestinal system where diffusion-weighted imaging can be helpful as well as pitfalls associated with its use.

CONCLUSION

Diffusion-weighted imaging has become an important and widely used tool in abdominal and pelvic MRI, but it has been used primarily for oncologic applications. As more body MRI protocols are routinely including diffusion-weighted imaging, this sequence can be useful in evaluating an increasing number of nononcologic processes.

Differentiation of focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic carcinoma: assessment by multiphase contrast-enhanced CT

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the utility of multiphase contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) findings alone and in combination for differentiating focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis (f-AIP) from pancreatic carcinoma (PC).

METHODS

The study group comprised 22 f-AIP lesions and 61 PC lesions. Two radiologists independently evaluated CT findings. Frequencies of findings were compared between f-AIP and PC. Statistical, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Homogeneous enhancement during the portal phase (AIP, 59 % vs. PC, 3 %; P < 0.001), dotted enhancement during the pancreatic phase (50 % vs. 7 %; P < 0.001), duct-penetrating sign (46 % vs. 2 %; P < 0.001), enhanced duct sign (36 % vs. 2 %; P < 0.001) and capsule-like rim (46 % vs. 3 %; P < 0.001) were more frequently observed in AIP. Ring-like enhancement during the delayed phase (5 % vs. 46 %; P < 0.001) and peripancreatic strands with a length of at least 10 mm (5 % vs. 39 %; P = 0.001) were more frequently observed in PC. AIP was identified with 82 % sensitivity and 98 % specificity using four of these seven findings. Multivariate analysis revealed significant differences in dotted enhancement (P = 0.004), duct-penetrating sign (P < 0.001) and capsule-like rim (P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of CT findings may allow improvements in differentiating f-AIP from PC.

KEY POINTS

• f-AIP can mimic PC on imaging findings. • The differentiation of f-AIP from PC is important in patient management. • Some CT findings can be used to identify AIP. • The combination of CT findings will improve differentiation from PC.

[Autoimmune pancreatitis. Evidence based management guidelines of the Hungarian Pancreatic Study Group]

Autoimmune pancreatitis is a rare disease which can even mimic pancreatic tumor, however, unlike the latter, it requires not surgical but conservative management. Correct diagnosis and differential diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis and treatment of these patients requires up-to-date and evidence based management guidelines. The Hungarian Pancreatic Study Group proposed to prepare an evidence based guideline based on the available international guidelines and evidences. The preparatory and consultation task force appointed by the Hungarian Pancreatic Study Group translated and complemented and/or modified the international guidelines if it was necessary. 29 relevant clinical questions in 4 topics were defined (Basics; Diagnosis; Differential diagnostics; Therapy). Evidence was classified according to the UpToDate(®) grading system. The draft of the guidelines was presented and discussed at the consensus meeting on September 12, 2014. All clinial questions were accepted with almost total (more than 95%) agreement. The present guideline is the first evidence based autoimmune pancreatitis guideline in Hungary. The guideline may provide very important and helpful data for tuition of autoimmune pancreatitis, for everyday practice and for establishing proper finance. Therefore, the authors believe that these guidelines will widely become a basic reference in Hungary.