A comparison of low-dose cytarabine and hydroxyurea with or without all-trans retinoic acid for acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome in patients not considered fit for intensive treatment

Multicenter, phase II study of decitabine for the first-line treatment of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia

PURPOSE

Older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have limited treatment options because of the lack of effectiveness and the toxicity of available therapies. We investigated the efficacy and toxicity of the hypomethylating agent decitabine as initial therapy in older patients with AML.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this multicenter, phase II study, patients older than 60 years who had AML (ie, > 20% bone marrow blasts) and no prior therapy for AML were treated with decitabine 20 mg/m(2) intravenously for 5 consecutive days of a 4-week cycle. Response was assessed by weekly CBC and bone marrow biopsy after cycle 2 and after each subsequent cycle. Patients continued to receive decitabine until disease progression or an unacceptable adverse event occurred.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients (mean age, 74 years) were enrolled and were treated with a median of three cycles (range, one to 25 cycles) of decitabine. The expert-reviewed overall response rate was 25% (complete response rate, 24%). The response rate was consistent across subgroups, including in patients with poor-risk cytogenetics and in those with a history of myelodysplastic syndrome. The overall median survival was 7.7 months, and the 30-day mortality rate was 7%. The most common toxicities were myelosuppression, febrile neutropenia, and fatigue.

CONCLUSION

Decitabine given in a low-dose, 5-day regimen has activity as upfront therapy in older patients with AML, and it has acceptable toxicity and 30-day mortality.

Optimal sequencing of treatments for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are characterized by chronic cytopenias and a high risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia. To date, only allogeneic stem cell transplantation has shown curative potential in MDS. The heterogeneous nature of MDS, and the paucity of randomized studies make individual therapeutic decisions, still largely based on the international prognostic scoring system, difficult.

RECENT FINDINGS

In lower-risk MDS, recent advances include demonstration of a possible survival advantage with erythropoiesis stimulating agents, the role of lenalidomide in cases with del 5q (which lead to its approval in the treatment of lower-risk MDS with del 5q by the Food and Drug Administration), and recognition of the importance of iron overload on prognosis. In higher-risk patients, progress has come from the use of reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic SCT in elderly patients, and from results obtained with the hypomethylating agents azacytidine and decitabine, leading to their approval for the treatment of symptomatic MDS by the Food and Drug Administration. In particular, results of a phase III trial show a significant survival benefit for azacytidine over conventional treatments in higher-risk MDS. This is the first time a drug demonstrates a survival impact in higher-risk MDS.

SUMMARY

We review these recent advances in this paper.

Clofarabine: a new treatment option for patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Clofarabine is a rationally designed, second-generation deoxyadenosine analog that incorporates characteristics of two other purine analogs, fludarabine and cladribine. It has shown efficacy in hematologic malignancies such as acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. It has already been approved for use in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia after two lines of previous therapy. Clinical trials have also shown clofarabine to have activity both as a single agent and in combination with other cytotoxic drugs in adult myeloid leukemia. This compound seems to have efficacy in older patients, as well as those with adverse cytogenetics.

Treating octogenarian and nonagenarian acute myeloid leukemia patients--predictive prognostic models

BACKGROUND

Treating the octogenarian and nonagenarian patients who have acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with intensive chemotherapy is controversial. Several models to predict outcome were proposed, including the use of a comorbidity index. However, it is unclear whether the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) or the hematopoietic cell transplant comorbidity index (HCTCI) is more sensitive.

METHODS

The authors analyzed their experience with 92 patients aged >or=80 years who had AML. Patients' pretreatment characteristics and their treatment outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

All patients were offered intensive treatment; 59 patients (64%) were treated intensively with a variety of regimens, whereas 33 patients (36%) elected to receive supportive care. The CCI and the HCTCI had similar predictive ability for outcome in both groups. A multivariate analyses of prognostic factors identified near-normal albumin (48% of patients; 1-year survival rate, >27%) as a favorable factor for the whole cohort, age <83 years (47% of patients; 1-year survival rate, >25%) and nonmonocytic morphology (75% of patients; 1-year survival rate, >26%) as favorable factors for the intensively treated cohort, and bone marrow blasts <46% (50% of patients; 1-year survival rate, >19%) as a favorable factor for patients who received supportive care.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective analysis was developed to assist in treatment decisions for octogenarian and nonagenarian patients with AML. The findings will need validation in a prospective study.

A randomized phase 3 study of tipifarnib compared with best supportive care, including hydroxyurea, in the treatment of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in patients 70 years or older

This phase 3, multicenter, open-label study evaluated the efficacy and safety of tipifarnib compared with best supportive care (BSC), including hydroxyurea, as first-line therapy in elderly patients (>or=70 years) with newly diagnosed, de novo, or secondary acute myeloid leukemia. A total of 457 patients were enrolled with 24% 80 years of age or older. Tipifarnib 600 mg orally twice a day was administered for the first 21 consecutive days, in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival. The median survival was 107 days for the tipifarnib arm and 109 days for the BSC arm. The hazard ratio (tipifarnib vs BSC) for overall survival was 1.02 (P value by stratified log-rank test, .843). The complete response rate for tipifarnib in this study (8%) was lower than that observed previously, but with a similar median duration of 8 months. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events were cytopenias in both arms, slightly more infections (39% vs 33%), and febrile neutropenia (16% vs 10%) seen in the tipifarnib arm. The results of this randomized study showed that tipifarnib treatment did not result in an increased survival compared with BSC, including hydroxyurea. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00093990.

Targeted treatment of acute myeloid leukemia in older adults: role of gemtuzumab ozogamicin

As the overall prognosis and treatment response rate to standard chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains poor in the older adult population, there is a need for more effective therapeutic agents with lower toxicity profiles that can be offered to these patients. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) is an anti-CD33 monoclonal antibody that was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use as monotherapy in patients 60 years of age and older with relapsed AML. GO consists of a humanized anti-CD33 antibody (hP67.6) which is linked to N-acetyl-gamma calicheamicin 1,2-dimethyl hydrazine dichloride. Once the antibody attaches to the surface antigen, it is rapidly internalized. Calicheamicin, a potent enediyne, is subsequently released and acts as a cytotoxic anti-tumor agent. In this population, GO has an acceptable toxicity and yields response rates approaching 30%. The efficacy of GO as monotherapy and in combination therapy for treatment of both de novo and relapsed AML continues to be investigated.

Prognostic factor analysis of the survival of elderly patients with AML in the MRC AML11 and LRF AML14 trials

This analysis, of 2483 patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) aged 60+ years entered into two UK trials, was performed to determine the baseline parameters related to survival and to develop a risk index. The Medical Research Council (MRC) AML11 trial (n = 1071) was used to develop the index; this was validated using data from the Leukaemia Research fund (LRF) AML14 trial on 1137 intensively (AML14I) and 275 non-intensively (AML14NI) treated patients. In AML11, cytogenetic group, age, white blood count, performance status and type of AML (de novo, secondary) were all highly significantly related to prognosis in multivariate analysis. The regression coefficients were used to define good, standard and poor risk groups, with 1-year survival of 53%, 43% and 16% respectively (P < 0.0001). The risk index showed very good discrimination in both AML14I and AML14NI (both P < 0.0001), thereby providing validation, although survival in all groups was very poor in AML14NI. The risk factors for survival in older AML patients were similar to those in younger ones and discrimination of patient groups with relatively good to very poor prognosis was possible. These risk groups apply to both intensively and non-intensively treated patients. Randomized trials of intensive versus non-intensive therapy are needed to determine which types of patient should be given which type of treatment.

Efficacy of azacitidine compared with that of conventional care regimens in the treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a randomised, open-label, phase III study

BACKGROUND

Drug treatments for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes provide no survival advantage. In this trial, we aimed to assess the effect of azacitidine on overall survival compared with the three commonest conventional care regimens.

METHODS

In a phase III, international, multicentre, controlled, parallel-group, open-label trial, patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes were randomly assigned one-to-one to receive azacitidine (75 mg/m(2) per day for 7 days every 28 days) or conventional care (best supportive care, low-dose cytarabine, or intensive chemotherapy as selected by investigators before randomisation). Patients were stratified by French-American-British and international prognostic scoring system classifications; randomisation was done with a block size of four. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Efficacy analyses were by intention to treat for all patients assigned to receive treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00071799.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 13, 2004, and Aug 7, 2006, 358 patients were randomly assigned to receive azacitidine (n=179) or conventional care regimens (n=179). Four patients in the azacitidine and 14 in the conventional care groups received no study drugs but were included in the intention-to-treat efficacy analysis. After a median follow-up of 21.1 months (IQR 15.1-26.9), median overall survival was 24.5 months (9.9-not reached) for the azacitidine group versus 15.0 months (5.6-24.1) for the conventional care group (hazard ratio 0.58; 95% CI 0.43-0.77; stratified log-rank p=0.0001). At last follow-up, 82 patients in the azacitidine group had died compared with 113 in the conventional care group. At 2 years, on the basis of Kaplan-Meier estimates, 50.8% (95% CI 42.1-58.8) of patients in the azacitidine group were alive compared with 26.2% (18.7-34.3) in the conventional care group (p<0.0001). Peripheral cytopenias were the most common grade 3-4 adverse events for all treatments.

INTERPRETATION

Treatment with azacitidine increases overall survival in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes relative to conventional care.

The DNA methyltransferase inhibitors azacitidine, decitabine and zebularine exert differential effects on cancer gene expression in acute myeloid leukemia cells

The three DNA methyltransferase (DNMT)-inhibiting cytosine nucleoside analogues, azacitidine, decitabine and zebularine, which are currently studied as nonintensive therapy for myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia (AML), differ in structure and metabolism, suggesting that they may have differential molecular activity. We investigated cellular and molecular effects of the three substances relative to cytarabine in Kasumi-1 AML blasts. Under in vitro conditions mimicking those used in clinical trials, the DNMT inhibitors inhibited proliferation and triggered apoptosis but did not induce myeloid differentiation. The DNMT inhibitors showed no interference with cell-cycle progression whereas cytarabine treatment resulted in an S-phase arrest. Quantitative methylation analysis of hypermethylated gene promoters and of genome-wide LINE1 fragments using bisulfite sequencing and MassARRAY suggested that the hypomethylating potency of decitabine was stronger than that of azacitidine; zebularine showed no hypomethylating activity. In a comparative gene expression analysis, we found that the effects of each DNMT inhibitor on gene transcription were surprisingly different, involving several genes relevant to leukemogenesis. In addition, the gene methylation and expression analyses suggested that the effects of DNMT-inhibiting cytosine nucleoside analogues on the cellular transcriptome may, in part, be unrelated to direct promoter DNA hypomethylation, as previously shown by others.

Active oral regimen for elderly adults with newly diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemia: a preclinical and phase 1 trial of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib (R115777, Zarnestra) combined with etoposide

The farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib exhibits modest activity against acute myelogenous leukemia. To build on these results, we examined the effect of combining tipifarnib with other agents. Tipifarnib inhibited signaling downstream of the farnesylated small G protein Rheb and synergistically enhanced etoposide-induced antiproliferative effects in lymphohematopoietic cell lines and acute myelogenous leukemia isolates. We subsequently conducted a phase 1 trial of tipifarnib plus etoposide in adults over 70 years of age who were not candidates for conventional therapy. A total of 84 patients (median age, 77 years) received 224 cycles of oral tipifarnib (300-600 mg twice daily for 14 or 21 days) plus oral etoposide (100-200 mg daily on days 1-3 and 8-10). Dose-limiting toxicities occurred with 21-day tipifarnib. Complete remissions were achieved in 16 of 54 (30%) receiving 14-day tipifarnib versus 5 of 30 (17%) receiving 21-day tipifarnib. Complete remissions occurred in 50% of two 14-day tipifarnib cohorts: 3A (tipifarnib 600, etoposide 100) and 8A (tipifarnib 400, etoposide 200). In vivo, tipifarnib plus etoposide decreased ribosomal S6 protein phosphorylation and increased histone H2AX phosphorylation and apoptosis. Tipifarnib plus etoposide is a promising orally bioavailable regimen that warrants further evaluation in elderly adults who are not candidates for conventional induction chemotherapy. These clinical studies are registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00112853.

Gene mutations and response to treatment with all-trans retinoic acid in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Results from the AMLSG Trial AML HD98B

BACKGROUND

In a previous randomized trial, AML HD98B, we showed that administration of all-trans retinoic acid in addition to intensive chemotherapy improved the outcome of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the prognostic impact of gene mutations and to identify predictive genetic factors for the all-trans retinoic acid treatment effect.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Data from mutation analyses of the NPM1, CEBPA, FLT3, and MLL genes were correlated with outcome in patients 61 years and older treated within the AML HD98B trial.

RESULTS

The frequencies of mutations were: NPM1, 23%; CEBPA, 8.5% (analysis restricted to patients with a normal karyotype); FLT3 internal tandem duplications (ITD), 17%; FLT3 tyrosine kinase domain mutations, 5%; and MLL partial tandem duplications, 4.5%. The genotype mutant NPM1 was positively and adverse cytogenetics as well as higher white blood cell count negatively correlated with achievement of complete remission. In Cox regression analysis, a significant interaction between the genotype mutant NPM1 without FLT3-ITD and treatment with all-trans retinoic acid was identified, in that the beneficial effect of all-trans retinoic acid on relapse-free and overall survival was restricted to this subgroup of patients. Other significant factors for survival were age, adverse cytogenetics, and logarithm of white cell count.

CONCLUSIONS

In elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia, NPM1 mutations are associated with achievement of complete remission, and the genotype 'mutant NPM1 without FLT3-ITD' appears to be a predictive marker for response to all-trans retinoic acid given as an adjunct to intensive chemotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00151242).

Are new agents really making a difference in MDS?

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of bone marrow stem cell disorders characterized by dysplastic hypercellular marrows with peripheral cytopenias. The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society estimates the annual US incidence of MDS is at least 12,000. MDS occurs primarily in people over 60 years old. The pathophysiology of most subtypes of MDS is poorly understood. Treating MDS remains a challenge despite the availability of new agents, such as lenalidomide, azacitidine, and decitabine. Whether these drugs have made a real difference in treating this group of diseases remains controversial.

Arsenic trioxide and low-dose cytarabine in older patients with untreated acute myeloid leukemia, excluding acute promyelocytic leukemia

BACKGROUND

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) carries a dismal prognosis in older patients. In this study, the authors evaluated the safety and efficacy of arsenic trioxide combined with low-dose cytarabine in untreated patients aged >or=60 years with AML.

METHODS

In a phase 1/2 design, arsenic trioxide was administered intravenously at a dose of 0.25 mg/kg on Days 1 through 5 and on Days 8 through 12, and low-dose cytarabine was given subcutaneously twice daily on Days 1 through 14 in escalating doses to a target of 10 mg/m(2) per dose. Of 64 patients who had pathologically confirmed AML, excluding patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia and using World Health Organization criteria, the median age was 71 years, 10 patients (16%) had treatment-related AML, 40 patients (63%) had an antecedent myelodysplastic syndrome or myeloproliferative disorder, and 35 patients (55%) had unfavorable cytogenetics. Thirty-four patients (53%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or 3.

RESULTS

Complete remission was achieved in 21 of 61 patients (34%), including 15 of 50 patients (30%) who had secondary or treatment-related AML, 10 of 33 patients (30%) who had unfavorable cytogenetics, and 6 of 34 patients (18%) who had a poor baseline performance status. The mortality rate within the first 4 weeks was 8%. Neutropenic fever was observed in >80% of patients, and 41% of patients had bacteremia. Nonhematologic toxicity generally was mild and reversible and included fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, rash, peripheral edema, and elevated transaminases. There were no clinically significant cardiac arrhythmias.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of arsenic trioxide to low-dose cytarabine appeared to improve responses in elderly patients who had AML compared with either agent alone, and a randomized trial of the combination versus single-agent low-dose cytarabine is ongoing.

Arsenic and old lace: novel approaches in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Arsenic has been used for more than 2,000 years in the treatment of a variety of medical conditions, including plague, hysteria, syphilis, and cancer. Numerous potential mechanisms of action have been identified. Arsenic trioxide has remarkable efficacy in acute promyelocytic leukemia and is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for this indication. It has also been studied in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and multiple myeloma and has limited single-agent efficacy in these diseases. We have completed a phase I/II trial of arsenic trioxide combined with low-dose ara-C (LDAC) in 49 patients with Int-2/high-risk MDS and 64 patients age 60 years and older with untreated AML. The regimen was generally well tolerated and complete remissions were observed in both MDS and AML patients, including in patients with poor baseline performance status and unfavorable cytogenetics. Manuscript has been accepted for publication.

Age and acute myeloid leukemia: real world data on decision to treat and outcomes from the Swedish Acute Leukemia Registry

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is most common in the elderly, and most elderly are thought to be unfit for intensive treatment because of the risk of fatal toxicity. The Swedish Acute Leukemia Registry covers 98% of all patients with AML (nonacute promyelocytic leukemia) diagnosed in 1997 to 2005 (n = 2767), with a median follow-up of 5 years, and reports eligibility for intensive therapy, performance status (PS), complete remission rates, and survival. Outcomes were strongly age and PS dependent. Early death rates were always lower with intensive therapy than with palliation only. Long-term survivors were found among elderly given intensive treatment despite poor initial PS. Total survival of elderly AML patients was better in the geographic regions where most of them were given standard intensive therapy. This analysis provides unique real world data from a large, complete, and unselected AML population, both treated and untreated, and gives background to treatment decisions for the elderly. Standard intensive treatment improves early death rates and long-term survival compared with palliation. Most AML patients up to 80 years of age should be considered fit for intensive therapy, and new therapies must be compared with standard induction.

Emerging treatment strategies for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the elderly

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is more prevalent in older adults, with an incidence in the United States of 17.6 per 100,000 for those 65 years of age, compared with an incidence of 1.8 per 100,000 for those <65 years of age. While there have been improvements in survival during the last decade for younger patients, prognosis in elderly patients is still poor; approximately 50% achieve complete responses, but many of them relapse. With increasing age, more patients are suboptimal candidates for standard induction chemotherapy due to poor performance status, pre-existing myelodysplasia, unfavorable cytogenetics, treatment-related AML, multidrug resistance protein expression, and CD34 positivity, which are often characteristic of this patient population. In addition, the presence of comorbid conditions make many treatment options less tolerable for elderly patients. Several investigators have described subgroups showing no benefit after intensive treatment approaches in recent years. However, several novel agents have been developed to treat elderly AML patients. These include new chemotherapeutic agents, such as nucleoside analogs, as well as targeted therapies like farnesyltransferase inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, epigenetic drugs, and antibodies. On the other hand new insights into the biology of the disease lead to a better understanding of its heterogeneity. Thus, with a variety of novel substances at hand it is increasingly important to introduce a risk-adapted approach for the optimal management of patients. This review will identify subgroups not likely to benefit from intensive chemotherapy and highlight the efficacy and tolerability of new agents in the treatment of AML.

A phase I study of bexarotene, a retinoic X receptor agonist, in non-M3 acute myeloid leukemia

PURPOSE

Bexarotene is a retinoic X receptor agonist that has been shown in vitro to inhibit growth and induce differentiation of myeloid leukemic cell lines. We therefore conducted a phase I dose escalation study to assess the maximum tolerated dose, toxicities, and activity of bexarotene in patients with non-M3 acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We enrolled patients with active non-M3 AML who had either relapsed or refractory disease or were not eligible for standard cytotoxic chemotherapy. Cohorts of three to six patients received escalating doses of daily oral bexarotene ranging from 100 to 400 mg/m(2) until evidence of disease progression or unacceptable adverse events occurred.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients, with median age of 69 years (range, 51-82 years), were treated. Twenty-four (89%) patients had undergone prior chemotherapy. At the highest dose level tested (400 mg/m(2)), three of six patients had to reduce their dose of bexarotene due to grade 3 adverse events. The maximum tolerable dose of bexarotene was determined to be 300 mg/m(2). Clinical activity was manifested by 4 (15%) patients with reduction in bone marrow blasts to <or=5%, 11 (41%) patients with improved platelet counts, and 7 (26%) patients with improved neutrophil counts. Three patients with relapsed AML survived >1 year while taking bexarotene. Leukemic blast differentiation was suggested by the presence of the leukemic cytogenetic abnormality in mature circulating granulocytes and the occurrence of differentiation syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended dose of bexarotene for future studies is 300 mg/m(2)/d. Bexarotene is well tolerated in patients with non-M3 AML and has evidence of antileukemic activity.

Therapeutic advances in leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome over the past 40 years

Major therapeutic progress has been accomplished in leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) over the past 40 years, which may not be fully appreciated by the larger medical community. The objective of this review was to briefly highlight the treatment breakthroughs in leukemia and MDS. Therapeutic progress happened through better understanding of disease pathophysiologies and rational development of targeted agents, like imatinib mesylate in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and through astute, empirical discoveries in the clinic, like all-trans retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) and chlorodeoxyadenosine in hairy cell leukemia (HCL). Today, the 5- to 10-year survival rates in patients with APL and HCL exceed 80%. In patients with CML, imatinib therapy has been associated with estimated 5- to 7-year survival rates from 85% to 90%. In patients with adult acute lymphocytic leukemia, modern intensive regimens have improved the 5-year survival rates from 20% up to 40%. In patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, chemoimmunotherapy recently produced high rates of quality responses and improved long-term outcome. In younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the 5-year survival rates range from 40% to 50%, although elderly AML remains a therapeutic challenge. In patients with MDS, it was recently demonstrated that epigenetic therapy with hypomethylating agents improved survival. Much therapeutic progress has been witnessed in leukemia and MDS, and much more is expected to occur soon.

Acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly

The incidence of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is increasing with age. As the results associated with standard intensive chemotherapy remain particularly disappointing in older patients, they represent an ideal target population for clinical and therapeutic investigations. Current attempts are to better define those who may draw a significant benefit from intensive chemotherapy, in order to test new less intensive approaches in the remaining patients. Hopefully, a lot of promising alternative therapies are emerging, including hypomethylating agents, histone deacetylase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, or chemotherapeutic agents such as cloretazine or clofarabine. Reduced-intensity conditioning stem cell transplantation or other various immunological approaches represent another way of investigation.

A randomized study of clofarabine versus clofarabine plus low-dose cytarabine as front-line therapy for patients aged 60 years and older with acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome

We previously reported the feasibility of clofarabine and cytarabine combinations in AML. Questions remain as to (1) the therapeutic advantage of this combination and (2) the role of lower doses of clofarabine and cytarabine in older patients. We have conducted an adaptively randomized study of lower-dose clofarabine with or without low-dose cytarabine in previously untreated patients with AML aged 60 years and older. Patients received 30 mg/m(2) clofarabine intravenously daily for 5 days with or without 20 mg/m(2) cytarabine subcutaneously daily for 14 days as induction. Consolidation consisted of 3 days of clofarabine with or without 7 days of cytarabine. Seventy patients were enrolled. The median age was 71 years (range, 60-83 years). Sixteen patients received clofarabine and 54 the combination. Overall, 56% achieved complete remission (CR). CR rate was significantly higher with the combination (63% vs 31%; P = .025). Induction mortality was 19% with the combination versus 31% with clofarabine alone (P = .276). The combination showed better event-free survival (7.1 months vs 1.7 months; P = .04), but not overall survival (11.4 months vs 5.8 months; P = .1). Clofarabine plus low-dose cytarabine has a higher response rate than clofarabine alone with comparable toxicity. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as no. NCT00088218.

Induction therapy for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a disease of older adults. Efforts to intensify therapy along traditional avenues have failed to yield improved results. There remains significant clinical equipoise as to how to "induce" patients and whether or not 7+3-style regimens improve outcomes over low-dose cytarabine. What is certain is that even in those not receiving active therapy, AML is an exceptionally morbid disease. Diverse interventions are being explored in the management of older patients with AML and the currently available data will be reviewed.

Acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly: conventional and novel treatment approaches

Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is a disorder affecting primarily elderly individuals and poses significant treatment challenges. Much has been learned about the underlying immunologic, cytogenetic and molecular features of AML in recent years, and many features have been identified that portend a poor prognosis for elderly patients with newly diagnosed AML. Despite this, treatment outcomes for elderly patients remain poor for both newly diagnosed and relapsed disease. While conventional treatment approaches may be appropriate for some elderly patients, the vast majority do not tolerate intensive chemotherapy well, thus alternative strategies have been investigated. Here we review both conventional and novel treatment approaches for elderly patients with AML, including agents in early clinical trials. Treatment options have been divided into several discussions, including conventional treatments, agents complementary to conventional treatments, alternatives to conventional induction therapies, post-induction treatment, and relapsed disease. Current and developing research focuses upon identifying subgroups of patients that benefit more from specific chemotherapeutic agents. Treating elderly patients with AML requires an organized, multidisciplinary approach, taking into account individual patient characteristics, preferences, and comorbidities when formulating treatment plans.

Amsacrine containing induction therapy in elderly AML patients: Comparison to standard induction regimens in a matched-pair analysis

Many elderly patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) present with cardiac comorbidity precluding the use of anthracycline containing chemotherapy regimens. Amsacrine, a topoisomerase II inhibitor, has been proposed as possible alternative to anthracyclines. Here, we report about the combination of amsacrine (210 mg/m(2)), in replacement for daunorubicin (DNR), with standard dose cytarabine and thioguanine (TAA) to elderly patients (>or=60 years of age) with impaired cardiac function. The outcome of 16 patients with a median age of 66 years treated between 1997 and 2003 was compared with standard treatment regimens of the AMLCG study group in a matched-pair analysis. There were no statistically significant differences in response rate, relapse free survival or overall survival between TAA treated patients or standard therapy. In conclusion, replacing anthracyclines with amsacrine for induction therapy of AML patients with significant cardiac comorbidities represents a treatment option without compromising the potential curability of the disease.

Epigenetic treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemias

Epigenetic mechanisms affecting chromatin structure contribute to regulate gene expression and assure the inheritance of information, which are essential for the proper expression of key regulatory genes in healthy cells, tissues and organs. In the medical field, an increasing body of evidence indicates that altered gene expression or de-regulated gene function lead to disease. Cancer cells also suffer a profound change in the genomic methylation patterns and chromatin status. Aberrant DNA methylation patterns, changes in chromatin structure and in gene expression are common in all kind of tumor types. However, studies on leukemias have provided paradigmatic examples for the functional implications of the epigenetic alterations in cancer development and progression as well as their relevance for therapeutical targeting.

Impact of remission induction chemotherapy on survival in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia

BACKGROUND

Significant controversy surrounds the use of remission induction chemotherapy (IC) in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Earlier clinical trials have yielded conflicting results and possibly a minor survival benefit, often offset by a longer hospitalization time.

METHODS

To evaluate the role of IC in patients with AML, a case control study of patients 60 years or older treated at the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center between 1997 and 2005 was conducted. Forty-four patients who did not receive IC were matched by a propensity analysis to 138 patients who received an anthracycline-based regimen.

RESULTS

The unadjusted median survival of patients who did not receive IC was 53 days, compared with 197 days (P < .001) for those who did. After further adjusting for age, gender, race, leukocyte count at presentation, AML cytogenetics, history of prior hematologic disorder, and assessing for comorbidities, not receiving IC was still associated with worse survival (hazards ratio of 1.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-3.05 [P = .01]). Additional predictors of poor outcomes in older adults with AML included higher leukocyte count at presentation, poor-risk cytogenetics, and African-American race (compared with Caucasians).

CONCLUSIONS

The study suggests improved outcomes in older adults with AML who undergo remission induction therapy.

Prognostic Factors in Elderly Patients with AML and the Implications for Treatment

The outcome of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has not improved in the last three decades. These patients are more likely to have comorbid illness, poor performance status, and impaired organ function. These clinical features limit their ability to tolerate intensive cytotoxic chemotherapy and result in greater early mortality. The AML seen in elderly patients is also more likely to have evolved from a prior hematologic disorder, and the leukemic blasts are more likely to have poor-risk structural and numeric cytogenetic abnormalities and expression of multidrug resistance protein (MDR1). These blast features have been associated with greater resistance to therapy. Attempts to improve outcome have generally been unsuccessful. Priming of leukemic blasts with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors during cytarabine therapy, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support to speed neutrophil recovery following induction therapy, inhibition of the MDR1 p-glycoprotein efflux pump, the use of alternative anthracyclines, and the addition of high-dose cytarabine have all been investigated in the last three decades. Further manipulation of standard cytotoxic chemotherapy alone is unlikely to improve the outcome for the majority of patients with AML. Incorporation of molecularly targeted therapies may prove to be less toxic and/or more efficacious. However, patient selection for clinical trials will continue to confound the interpretation of treatment outcomes on clinical trials of older patients with AML.