Long-term outcomes after radiosurgery for acoustic neuromas

Stereotastic radiosurgery for glomus jugulare tumors

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Surgery is considered to be the mainstay of treatment for glomus jugulare tumors. A subset of patients are poor surgical candidates based on age, medical problems, tumor size, or prior treatment failure. The purpose of this study was to review our results with stereotactic radiosurgery (gamma knife treatment) in this group of patients, with particular attention to adverse reactions and symptom relief.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review and phone survey.

METHODS

Charts were reviewed for size and location of tumor, history of previous treatment, symptoms before and after treatment, amount of radiation received, acute and late complications, and functional level before and after treatment. Pre-treatment and posttreatment magnetic resonance imaging scans were also reviewed. Identified patients were then contacted for a phone interview.

RESULTS

Eight patients were identified. Phone interviews were conducted with four patients. Four patients had failed previous treatment. Follow-up ranged from 7 to 104 months. One patient experienced an acute complication: intractable vertigo requiring hospitalization. No patient experienced delayed cranial neuropathies. No patient reported worsening of any of the following symptoms: pulsatile tinnitus, hearing loss, facial weakness, hoarseness, or difficulty swallowing. Three patients reported improvement in their pulsatile tinnitus. Two patients reported improvement in hearing loss, and one patient each reported improvement in vertigo and difficulty swallowing.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary results suggest that stereotactic radiosurgery is useful to control symptoms and may be delivered safely in patients with primary or recurrent glomus jugulare tumors who are poor surgical candidates.

Physical and biological targeting of radiotherapy

Targeting of radiotherapy can be based on improving physical dose distribution of radiation delivered or on utilization of specific biological processes for targeting. Tools for physical targeting include brachytherapy, hadron therapy, conformal radiotherapy, stereotactic radiotherapy, stereotactically guided conformal fractionated radiotherapy, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Biological targeting can be based on specific metabolic pathways such as uptake of iodine-131 by thyroid cancer cells, difference in substrate uptake between cancer cells and normal cells (e.g. boronophenylalanine in boron neutron capture therapy), targeting of radioactive isotopes by specific carrier molecules (radioimmunotherapy, labeled hormone derivatives or bone-seeking phosphonates), or on the distribution of elements in the body (therapy of bone metastases with a calcium analog strontium-89 or phosphorus-32).

Stereotactically delivered cranial radiation therapy: a ten-year experience of linac-based radiosurgery in the UK

In 1989, linear accelerator (linac)-based cranial stereotactic radiation therapy ('radiosurgery') was introduced in the UK at St Bartholomew's Hospital; a new, relocatable stereotactic frame was first used at the same time, allowing fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. In the first decade of clinical practice using this technology, some 200 patients with blood vessel tumours/malformations have been treated, together with another 200 suffering from other conditions. The usefulness of this technique for cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVM) has been demonstrated, and also a significant cure rate for AVM of >3 cm diameter (which is larger than for those previously reported after treatment on the gamma unit), albeit attended by a higher complication rate. The epilepsy associated with AVM is much improved by successful radiotherapy. The usefulness of radiosurgery for glomus tumours has been confirmed and new data published on the efficacy of the technique for haemangioblastoma, with new radiation therapy strategies designed for patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease. The acoustic neuroma treatment results have included improvements in hearing (a result not reported in the gamma unit literature), which are ascribed to the lower internal dose gradient within the target volume. Fractionation will, it is argued, also lead to sparing of the special sensory cochlear nerve. The risks of radiosurgery to the brainstem for chordoma of the mid-clivus are reduced by using a 'spacer' technique for the prepontine space. For meningiomas involving the cavernous sinus, conventionally fractionated radiotherapy is recommended when the meningeal base diameter exceeds 3.0 cm and radiosurgery (utilizing fractionation where appropriate) is advised for smaller lesions. Thus far, radiosurgery indications for pituitary adenomas have been restricted to recurrences after conventional radiotherapy, usually those in the cavernous sinus. In therapy for recurrent craniopharyngioma, it is argued that fractionation delivered via the relocatable frame will be important, particularly when the disease envelops the optic chiasma. For semicystic/semisolid craniopharyngiomas, the stereotactic delivery of colloidal yttrium-90 into a cystic element is useful, while stereotactic radiosurgery is delivered to the solid component. Staff at this centre consider that radiosurgery for low-grade gliomas, perhaps as boost therapy after conventional fractionation, is worthy of more research. We have been extremely selective in the use of radiosurgery for brain metastases (2% of patients, compared with about 30% in some Gamma Knife units), but future indications may become broader, probably using it as a booster technique after whole-brain conventionally-fractionated radiotherapy. Positron emission tomography scanning, co-registered with magnetic resonance imaging, allows the 'boost' concept in radiosurgery to become a sophisticated and accurate reality. Post-radiosurgical sequelae have been placed within a standard framework classification. New observations are being made with regard to subacute reactions: late-responding intrinsic and extra-axial tumours may swell in the subacute period, prior to shrinkage, and be attended by symptomatic surrounding brain oedema.

Stereotactic radiosurgery, X: clinical isodosimetry of gamma knife versus linear accelerator X-knife for pituitary and acoustic tumours

Several review articles have compared gamma unit versus linear accelerator (linac)-based radiosurgery systems, concluding that the dose gradient 'fall-off' at the margin of the target (expressed as the distance between isodoses) is very similar for both techniques as far as single isocentre treatment volumes up to 1.5 cm diameter are concerned, and that the two radiosurgical systems are, in general, comparable. 'Fine tuning' of the gamma unit can be carried out by using multiple isocentre plans, the differential use of small collimator sizes (down to 4 mm) and field weightings, and adroit use of the gamma angle, and selective beam blocking. Multiple isocentre plans, beam modification, restriction of gantry angles and arc lengths, and microcollimation can similarly improve the isodose gradients from linac units. In both instances, the dosimetric advantages occur along selected aspects of the target perimeter border. However, the more frequent use of multiple isocentred 'shots' on the gamma unit achieves greater conformity indices for more complex target volumes, but at the expense of steeper internal dose gradients. We studied two patients with tumours close to or arising from radiosensitive special sensory nerves (optic and cochlear) to compare and contrast fine tuning of the two technologies. In a previously irradiated patient with a pituitary adenoma, the dose gradient achieved at the rostral margin, adjacent to the optic chiasma, was steeper on the gamma unit (due to the concentration of small collimator shots rostrally and beam blocking), which was therefore the dosimetrically preferred technique. In contrast, the vastly smaller internal dose gradient (11% for linac/X-knife versus 100% for Gamma Knife) and the ability to fractionate on the X-knife system, gave a large dosimetric advantage to the X-knife plan in the treatment of an acoustic neuroma, where the intracanalicular component of the cochlear nerve traversed the target volume. This advantage also pertains to the cochlear ramus of the internal auditory (labyrinthine) artery and the facial nerve. Our published work on X-knife radiosurgery of acoustic neuroma has documented improvement of hearing after therapy and may be relevant in this regard. That there are advantages in physical dose distribution and fractionation, producing a reduction in the biological dose in normal tissue, argues for the use of linac technology in acoustic neuromas. Craniopharyngiomas enveloping the optic nerve/chiasma will similarly be better treated by the linac X-knife system. It is apparent that different radiosurgery systems may be indicated in particular neuro-oncological situations.

Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery and preservation of hearing in patients with vestibular schwannoma: a preliminary report

OBJECTIVE

Microsurgery and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for vestibular schwannomas are associated with a relatively high incidence of sensorineural hearing loss. A prospective trial of fractionated SRS was undertaken in an attempt to preserve hearing and minimize incidental cranial nerve injury.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients with vestibular schwannomas were treated with 2100 cGy in three fractions during a 24-hour period using conventional frame-based linear accelerator radiosurgery. The median tumor diameter was 20 mm (range, 7-42 mm). Baseline and follow-up evaluations included audiometry and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. End points were tumor progression, preservation of serviceable hearing, and treatment-related complications.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients (32 tumors) were assessable for tumor progression and treatment-related complications and 21 patients for preservation of serviceable hearing, with a median follow-up interval of 2 years (range, 0.5-4.0 yr). Tumor regression or stabilization was documented in 30 patients (97%) and tumor progression in 1 (3%). The patient with tumor progression remains asymptomatic and has not required surgical intervention. Five patients (16%) developed trigeminal nerve injury at a median of 6 months (range, 4-12 mo) after SRS; two of these patients had preexisting trigeminal neuropathy. One patient (3%) developed facial nerve injury (House-Brackmann Class 3) 7 months after SRS. Preservation of useful hearing (Gardner-Robertson Class 1-2) was 77% at 2 years. All patients with pretreatment Gardner-Robertson Class 1 to 2 hearing maintained serviceable (Class 1-3) hearing as of their last follow-up examination.

CONCLUSION

Three-fraction SRS with a conventional stereotactic frame is feasible and well tolerated in the treatment of acoustic neuroma. This study demonstrates a high rate of hearing preservation and few treatment-related complications among a relatively high-risk patient cohort (tumors >15 mm or neurofibromatosis Type 2). Longer follow-up will be required to assess the durability of tumor control.

Improved trigeminal and facial nerve tolerance following fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for large acoustic neuromas

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate improved cranial nerve tolerance following fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for large acoustic neuromas, defined as tumours with pons-petrous distance (A) > 1 cm and midporous transverse diameter (A + Y) > 2 cm. Of 28 patients with acoustic neuromas treated with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy, 19 had large tumours at high risk for radiosurgery-induced cranial neuropathy. Six patients received 36 Gy in six, weekly, fractions and 13 patients received 30 Gy in six, weekly, fractions. 15 patients had evaluable trigeminal nerve function and 16 had evaluable facial nerve function. At a median follow-up of 4.5 years, tumour shrinkage was seen in 10 patients and tumour size was stable in nine. None of the patients developed any evidence of transient, or permanent, trigeminal or facial neuropathy at any time during their follow-up period. Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy may offer a superior therapeutic ratio to single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of large acoustic neuromas, as evidenced by the absence of post-treatment trigeminal and facial neuropathy.

Dose reduction improves hearing preservation rates after intracanalicular acoustic tumor radiosurgery

OBJECTIVE

To assess the potential for long-term serviceable hearing preservation in intracanalicular acoustic tumor patients who underwent stereotactic radiosurgery.

METHODS

Between August 1987 and December 1997, 29 patients with intracanalicular acoustic tumors underwent stereotactic radiosurgery at our center using the Leksell gamma knife (Elekta Instruments, Inc., Atlanta, GA). Fifteen assessable patients had serviceable preradiosurgery hearing (pure tone average, < or = 50 dB; speech discrimination score, > or = 50%). We retrospectively analyzed our hearing results and compared hearing preservation in patients who received a minimal tumor dose of 14 Gy or less versus those who received more than 14 Gy to the tumor margin.

RESULTS

No perioperative patient morbidity or mortality was observed. Serviceable hearing was preserved in 11 (73%) of 15 assessable patients (actuarial rate, 65%). Long-term follow-up demonstrated serviceable hearing preservation in 10 (100%) of 10 patients who received marginal tumor doses of 14 Gy or less but in only one of five patients who received more than 14 Gy. Preradiosurgery Gardner-Robertson class was preserved in 49%, and testable hearing was present in 68% of patients who had any testable hearing at presentation. Five patients demonstrated improvement in hearing (three had serviceable and two had nonserviceable hearing before radiosurgery). No patient developed a facial or trigeminal neuropathy. Seven of 13 patients with preoperative tinnitus continued to experience tinnitus in follow-up. Episodic vertigo continued in 3 of the 11 patients who presented with vertigo.

CONCLUSION

Gamma knife radiosurgery (using conformal dose planning, small-beam geometry, and < or = 14 Gy to the margin) prevents tumor growth and achieves excellent hearing preservation rates.

Long-term outcomes after meningioma radiosurgery: physician and patient perspectives

OBJECT

Stereotactic radiosurgery is a primary or adjuvant management approach used to treat patients with intracranial meningiomas. The goal of radiosurgery is long-term prevention of tumor growth, maintenance of the patient's neurological function, and prevention of new neurological deficits. The object of this study is to report longer-term patient outcomes.

METHODS

The authors evaluated 99 consecutive patients who underwent radiosurgery for meningioma between 1987 and 1992. Evaluation was performed using serial imaging tests, clinical evaluations, and a patient survey that was administered between 5 and 10 years after radiosurgery. Four patients underwent two radiosurgery procedures for separate meningiomas. The average tumor margin dose was 16 Gy and the median tumor volume was 4.7 ml (range 0.24-24 ml). Fifty-seven patients (57%) had undergone prior resection, of which 12 procedures were considered "total." Five patients received fractionated radiation therapy before radiosurgery. Eighty-nine patients (89%) had skull base tumors. The clinical tumor control rate (no resection required) was 93%. Sixty-one (63%) of 97 tumors became smaller, 31 (32%) remained unchanged in size, and five (5%) were enlarged. Resection was performed in seven patients (7%), six of whom had undergone prior resection. New neurological deficits developed in five patients (5%) 3 to 31 months after radiosurgery. Twenty-seven (42%) of 65 responding patients were employed at the time of radiosurgery and 20 (74%) of these remained so. Radiosurgery was believed to have been "successful" by 67 of 70 patients who completed an outcomes questionnaire 5 to 10 years later. At least one complication was described by nine patients (14%) and in four patients the complications resolved.

CONCLUSIONS

Five to 10 years after radiosurgery, 96% of surveyed patients believed that radiosurgery provided a satisfactory outcome for their meningioma. Overall, 93% of patients required no other tumor surgery. Incidences of morbidity in this early experience were usually transitory and relatively mild. Radiosurgery provided long-term tumor control associated with high rates of neurological function preservation and patient satisfaction.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal schwannomas

OBJECTIVE

Schwannomas that arise from the trigeminal nerve are rare and are usually managed by surgical resection. The role of radiosurgery in the care of patients with these basal tumors remains to be defined.

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical presentation, management, and outcomes for 16 trigeminal schwannoma patients who underwent gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery. Fifteen of the 16 patients presented with trigeminal sensory dysfunction. Nine patients had tumors in the region of the ganglion, six in the region of the trigeminal nerve root, and one in the region of the mandibular branch. Six patients had undergone one or more previous resections before radiosurgery. Ten underwent radiosurgery as the first procedure. The mean tumor volume was 5.3 cc (range, 1-17.8 cc). The mean tumor margin dose was 15.3 Gy (range, 12-20 Gy).

RESULTS

During the average imaging follow-up of 44 months (range, 8-116 mo), the tumor control rate was 100% (regression in nine patients and no further tumor growth in seven patients). Five patients had improvement of clinical symptoms, and 11 remained unchanged. No new cranial nerve deficit developed in any patient.

CONCLUSION

As a minimally invasive alternative to microsurgery, gamma knife radiosurgery proved to be an alternative primary or adjuvant strategy that controlled tumor growth, did not cause new deficits, and often improved presenting symptoms.