Most pancreatic cancer resections are R1 resections

Ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head: A focus on current diagnostic and surgical concepts

Complete surgical resection still remains the only possibility of curing pancreatic cancer, however, only 10% of patients undergo curative surgery. Pancreatic resection currently remains the only method of curing patients, and has a 5-year overall survival rate between 7%-34% compared to a median survival of 3-11 mo for unresected cancer. Pancreatic surgery is a technically demanding procedure requiring highly standardized surgical techniques. Nevertheless, even in experienced hands, perioperative morbidity rates (delayed gastric emptying, pancreatic fistula etc.) are as high as 50%. Different strategies to reduce postoperative morbidity, such as different techniques of gastroenteric reconstruction (pancreatico-jejunostomy vs pancreatico-gastrostomy), intraoperative placement of a pancreatic main duct stent or temporary sealing of the main pancreatic duct with fibrin glue have not led to a significant improvement in clinical outcome. The perioperative application of somatostatin or its analogues may decrease the incidence of pancreatic fistulas in cases with soft pancreatic tissue and a small main pancreatic duct (< 3 mm). The positive effects of external pancreatic main duct drainage and antecolic gastrointestinal reconstruction have been observed to decrease the rate of pancreatic fistulas and delayed gastric emptying, respectively. Currently, the concept of extended radical lymphadenectomy has been found to be associated with higher perioperative morbidity, but without any positive impact on overall survival. However, there is growing evidence that portal vein resections can be performed with acceptable low perioperative morbidity and mortality but does not achieve a cure.

Locally advanced pancreatic head cancer: margin-positive resection or bypass?

Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive disease with poor survival. The only effective therapy offering long-term survival is complete surgical resection. In the setting of nonmetastatic disease, locally advanced tumors constitute a technical challenge to the surgeon and may result in margin-positive resection margins. Few studies have evaluated the implications of the latter in depth. The aim of this study was to compare the margin-positive situation to palliative bypass procedures and margin-negative resections in terms of perioperative and long-term outcome. By retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained data from 360 patients operated for pancreatic cancer at our institution, we provide evidence that margin-positive resection still yields a significant survival benefit over palliative bypass procedures. At the same time, perioperative severe morbidity and mortality are not significantly increased. Our observations suggest that pancreatic cancer should be resected whenever technically feasible, including, cases of locally advanced disease.

Can the new RCP R0/R1 classification predict the clinical outcome in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head?

PURPOSE

According to the International Union Against Cancer (UICC), R1 is defined as the microscopic presence of tumor cells at the surface of the resection margin (RM). In contrast, the Royal College of Pathologists (RCP) suggested to declare R1 already when tumor cells are found within 1 mm of the RM. The aim of this study was to determine the significance of the RM concerning the prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

From 2007 to 2009, 62 patients underwent a curative operation for PDAC of the pancreatic head. The relevance of R status on cumulative overall survival (OS) was assessed on univariate and multivariate analysis for both the classic R classification (UICC) and the suggestion of the RCP.

RESULTS

Following the UICC criteria, a positive RM was detected in 8 %. Along with grading and lymph node ratio, R status revealed a significant impact on OS on univariate and multivariate analysis. Applying the suggestion of the RCP, R1 rate rose to 26 % resulting in no significant impact on OS in univariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study has shown that the RCP suggestion for R status has no impact on the prognosis of PDAC. In contrast, our data confirmed the UICC R classification of RM as well as N category, grading, and lymph node ratio as significant prognostic factors.

Appraisal of a total meso-pancreatoduodenum excision with pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The most significant prognostic factors for pancreatic head carcinoma (PHC) with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) are the resection margin and lymph node status. The curative surgical margin (R0) and complete clearance of regional lymph nodes contribute to the improvement of survival. To reduce microscopic residual tumor resection (R1) and achieve a complete lymphadenectomy around the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) when performing a PD for PHC, we propose a new concept of a total excision of the "meso-pancreatoduodenum." which consists of a cluster of the soft connective tissue along the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery and the first jejunal artery.

METHODS

A total of 39 consecutive patients underwent a PD for PHC between May 2006 and August 2011 at Shimane University Hospital. Twenty-five patients received a standard PD (sPD), while 14 cases underwent a total meso-pancreatoduodenum excision (tMPDe) with PD.

RESULTS

The tMPDe procedure was performed safely without any intraoperative complications. The total number of lymph nodes dissected was 18 (median, range: 5-40) in the sPD and 26 (median, range: 13-50) in the tMPDe (p = 0.027). R0 resection was accomplished in 60% and 93% of patients with the sPD and tMPDe, respectively, resulting in a significant decrease in the R1 rate in the tMPDe (7%) compared to that in the sPD (40%) (p = 0.019). No loco-regional recurrence was found around the SMA in the tMPDe patients.

CONCLUSION

Our surgical technique, tMPDe, is safe and more radical when performing a PD and should be adopted when performing pancreatic surgery as a pathological cure for pancreatic head carcinoma.

Pilot study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and oral S-1 for resectable pancreatic cancer

Results of surgery alone for pancreatic cancer are disappointing. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with gemcitabine and oral S-1 in patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer. A total of 34 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, radiologically diagnosed preoperatively as having potentially resectable tumors, underwent pancreatic resection with lymphadenectomy at Kanazawa University Hospital. NAC was administered to 13 patients (NAC group). The remaining 21 patients were surgically treated without preoperative chemotherapy (control group). Surgical results were compared between these two groups, with follow-up for at least 24 months. No statistically significant differences were found in the clinicopathological background data (tumor location, age, gender, lymph node metastases, tumor stage and tumor size) between the NAC and control groups. Following preoperative chemotherapy, no patients were judged to be unable to undergo laparotomy, i.e., neither distant metastasis nor tumor progression was observed. Radiologically, all 13 NAC group patients had stable disease, whereas, histopathologically, all tumor specimens showed evidence of tumor cells. The treatment effect was judged by Evans grading to be grade IIa in 11 patients and grade IIb in 2 patients. Toxicity was evaluated in 11 patients. Grade III side effects were regarded as hematological toxicity, i.e., leucopenia (7.7%) and thrombocytopenia (15.4%). Moreover, the incidence of perioperative complications did not differ significantly between the NAC and control groups. The one- and three-year overall survival rates of the NAC group with pancreatic head cancer were 88.9 and 55.6%, respectively, superior to 88.9 and 29.6% in the control group (p=0.055). Therefore, NAC with gemcitabine and S-1 is well tolerated and potentially effective against pancreatic head cancer. A phase I study of NAC with gemcitabine and S-1 is under way in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.

Resection margin involvement and tumour origin in pancreatic head cancer

BACKGROUND

Assessment of the origin of adenocarcinoma in pancreatoduodenectomy specimens (pancreatic, ampullary or biliary) and resection margin status is not performed in a consistent manner in different centres. The aim of this review was to identify the impact of such variations on patient outcome.

METHODS

A systematic literature search for articles on pancreatic, ampullary, distal bile duct and periampullary cancer was performed, with special attention to data on resection margin status, pathological examination and outcome.

RESULTS

The frequent reclassification of tumour origin following slide review, and the wide variation in published incidence of pancreatic (33-89 per cent), ampullary (5-42 per cent) and distal bile duct (5-38 per cent) cancers indicate that the histopathological distinction between the three cancer groups is less accurate than generally believed. Recent studies have shown that the wide range of rates of microscopic margin involvement (R1) in pancreatoduodenectomy specimens (18-85, 0-27 and 0-72 per cent respectively for pancreatic, ampullary and distal bile duct cancers) is mainly caused by differences in pathological assessment rather than surgical practice and patient selection. As a consequence of the existing inconsistency in reporting of these data items, the clinical significance of microscopic margin involvement in each of the three cancer groups remains unclear.

CONCLUSION

Inaccurate and inconsistent distinction between pancreatic, ampullary and distal bile duct cancer, combined with inaccuracies in resection margin assessment, results in obfuscation of key clinicopathological data. Specimen dissection technique plays a key role in the quality of the assessment of both tumour origin and margin status. Unless the pathological examination is meticulous and standardized, comparison of results between centres and observations in multicentre trials will remain of limited value.

Tumour growth is more dispersed in pancreatic head cancers than in rectal cancer: implications for resection margin assessment

AIMS

The UK definition of microscopic resection margin involvement (R1) in pancreatic head cancer, based on tumour lying <1 mm from the margin, has been adopted from rectal cancer, but has never been validated. The aim of this study was to assess the adequacy of the R1 definition for pancreatic head cancers by comparing the growth patterns of rectal (RC), pancreatic (PC), ampullary (AC) and distal bile duct (DBC) adenocarcinomas.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Distances between tumour cells and tumour cell density in the tumour centre and periphery were quantified by Minimum Spanning Tree (MST) analysis in 10 cases of the four cancer groups. In RC, the MST distance was similar throughout the entire width of the tumour, whereas in PC, DBC and AC it was significantly larger at the periphery than at the tumour centre (P ≤ 0.003). While results were similar for PC and DBC, however, distances at the centre and periphery of both cancers were larger compared to AC (P ≤ 0.046). Tumour cell density dropped at the periphery of PC to 31% of that at the centre, compared to 83% in RC (P < 0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

Tumour growth in pancreatic head cancers is more dispersed than in RC, particularly in the tumour periphery. Revision of the R1 definition for pancreatic head cancer may therefore need to be considered.

Syndecan-2 promotes perineural invasion and cooperates with K-ras to induce an invasive pancreatic cancer cell phenotype

Background

We have identified syndecan-2 as a protein potentially involved in perineural invasion of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cells.

Methods

Syndecan-2 (SDC-2) expression was analyzed in human normal pancreas, chronic pancreatitis and PDAC tissues. Functional in vitro assays were carried out to determine its role in invasion, migration and signaling.

Results

SDC-2 was expressed in the majority of the tested pancreatic cancer cell lines while it was upregulated in nerve-invasive PDAC cell clones. There were 2 distinct expression patterns of SDC-2 in PDAC tissue samples: SDC-2 positivity in the cancer cell cytoplasm and a peritumoral expression. Though SDC-2 silencing (using specific siRNA oligonucleotides) did not affect anchorage-dependent growth, it significantly reduced cell motility and invasiveness in the pancreatic cancer cell lines T3M4 and Su8686. On the transcriptional level, migration-and invasion-associated genes were down-regulated following SDC-2 RNAi. Furthermore, SDC-2 silencing reduced K-ras activity, phosphorylation of Src and - further downstream - phosphorylation of ERK2 while levels of the putative SDC-2 signal transducer p120GAP remained unaltered.

Conclusion

SDC-2 is a novel (perineural) invasion-associated gene in PDAC which cooperates with K-ras to induce a more invasive phenotype.

Metastatic lymph node ratio as an important prognostic factor in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Overall five year survival following pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma is poor with typical reported rates in the literature of 8-27%. The aim of this study was to identify the histological variables best able to predict long-term survival in these patients.

METHODS

A prospective database of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy between April 2002 and June 2009 was analysed to identify patients with histologically proven pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Patients with ampullary tumours, cholangiocarcinoma, duodenal adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumours were excluded. The histology reports for these patients were reviewed. Uni-variate and multi-variate survival analysis was performed to identify variables useful in predicting long-term outcome.

RESULTS

134 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma during this period. 5 year survival in this series was 18.6%. Uni-variate analysis identified nodal status and the metastatic to resected lymph node ratio as predictors of survival. Using multi-variate Cox Regression analysis a metastatic to lymph node ratio of >15% (p < 0.01) and the presence of perineural invasion (p < 0.05) were identified as independent predictors of patient survival. Metastatic to resected lymph node ratio is better able to stratify prognosis than nodal status alone with 5 year survival of those with N0 disease being 55.6% and 12.9% for N1 disease. However for those with <15% of resected nodes positive, 5 year survival was 21.7% and in those with >15% nodes positive it was 5.2% (p = 0.0017).

CONCLUSION

The metastatic to resected lymph node ratio can provide significant prognostic information in those patients with node positive disease after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

The surgical management of pancreatic cancer

There have been significant advances made over the years in the areas of critical care, anesthesia, and surgical technique, which have led to improved mortality rates and survival after resection for pancreatic cancer. The standard of care is currently PD or PPPD for pancreatic cancers of the head, uncinate process, or neck and DP for pancreatic cancers of the body or tail. Resections are performed with the goals of negative margins and minimal blood loss, and referral to high-volume centers and surgeons is encouraged. However, 5-year survival rate after curative resection still remains at less than 20%. In an effort to improve survival and extend the limits of resectability, many centers have attempted extended lymphadenectomy and portal venous and even arterial resection and reconstruction. Extended lymphadenectomy has not led to improved survival for these patients. Portal vein resection has increased the number of patients amenable to resection, with equivalent survival rates compared with those of standard resections. Portal vein invasion is thus no longer considered a contraindication to resection at many large centers. Resection and reconstruction of involved arteries have been rarely performed and are currently not considerations for most patients. It is likely that future improvements in survival lie in the realm of adjuvant therapy. As chemotherapeutic and other tumor-directed agents continue to evolve and advance, this will hopefully lead to improved survival for patients undergoing surgical resection for pancreatic cancer.

How to counter the problem of R1 resection in duodenopancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer?

OBJECTIVE

Although duodenopancreatectomy has been standardized for many years, the pathological examination of the specimen was re-described in the last years. In methodical pathological studies up to 85% had an R1 margin.1,2 These mainly involved the posterior und medial resection margin.3 As a consequence we need to optimize and standardize the pathological workup of the specimen and to extend the surgical resection, where possible without risk for the patient.

METHOD AND RESULT

In an instructive video we show the technique of duodenopancreatectomy with emphasis on the dorsal and medial resection margin. Furthermore we show the standardized pathological workup of the specimen, involving the reporting of all the resection margins.

CONCLUSION

To accurately determine R1 status at the posterior and medial resection margin, a close collaboration between pathologist and surgeon is crucial. Pathologists do a standardized workup of the resected specimen with staining of the surfaces and systematic analysis of all the resection margins. Surgeons need to extend the resection of the pancreatic head to the superior mesenteric artery by dorsal dissection.

Improving survival following surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma--a ten-year experience

OBJECTIVE

Report results following pancreatic surgery at a tertiary referral hospital in Norway, and our experience with the effects of preoperative use of common bile duct stents, the prophylactic efficacy of octreotide, and explore significant survival factors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Prospective observational study of 275 patients during the years 1999-2009.

RESULTS

Ninety-two ductal adenocarcinomas were operated, and 183 cases were inoperable. Pylorus preserving pancreatico-duodenectomy (PPPD) was performed in 42 cases, a classic Whipple procedure (WP) in 38, distal resection in 6 and total pancreatectomy in 6 patients. Median size of the tumours was 3 cm R(0) resection was obtained in 54 patients. Lymph node metastases were found in 64 patients. 20% experienced postoperative intra-abdominal complications, and 30 days postoperative mortality was 4%. A routine use of somatostatine analogues postoperatively did not reduce the frequency of leakage. Two years survival was 34.6% and 5 years 11.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ductal adenocarcinomas can be offered potential curative resections with acceptable rates of complication and mortality. Preoperative biliary stenting is still controversial and prophylactic octreotide should be used whenever the anastomosis is considered challenged and in cases of a soft pancreatic remnant. Five years all over survival has improved over the last decade from <5% to >11%.

Losses at chromosome 4q are associated with poor survival in operable ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Here we tested the prognostic impact of genomic alterations in operable localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Fifty-two formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded primary PDAC were laser micro-dissected and were investigated by comparative genomic hybridization after whole genome amplification using an adapter-linker PCR. Chromosomal gains and losses were correlated to clinico-pathological parameters and clinical follow-up data. The most frequent aberration was loss on chromosome 17p (65%) while the most frequent gains were detected at 2q (41%) and 8q (41%), respectively. The concomitant occurrence of losses at 9p and 17p was found to be statistically significant. Higher rates of chromosomal losses were associated with a more advanced primary tumor stage and losses at 9p and 18q were significantly associated with presence of lymphatic metastasis (chi-square: p = 0.03, p = 0.05, respectively). Deletions on chromosome 4 were of prognostic significance for overall survival and tumor recurrence (Cox-multivariate analysis: p = 0.026 and p = 0.021, respectively). In conclusion our data suggest the common alterations at chromosome 8q, 9p, 17p and 18q as well as the prognostic relevant deletions on chromosome 4q as relevant for PDAC progression. Our comprehensive data from 52 PDAC should provide a basis for future studies with a higher resolution to discover the relevant genes located within the chromosomal aberrations identified.

Neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis of phase II trials

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant treatment has proven beneficial for many gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies, but no phase III trials have been completed examining this approach in pancreatic cancer. This meta-analysis examines the best available phase II trials using neoadjuvant treatment for resectable and borderline/unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Phase II trials were identified using a MEDLINE search, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1960 to July 2010. Patients were divided into 2 groups: Patients with initially resectable tumors (group A), and patients with borderline/unresectable tumors (group B). Primary outcome measures were rate of resection and survival. Pooled proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects or fixed-effects models based on the heterogeneity of included studies.

RESULTS

A total of 14 phase II clinical trials including 536 patients were analyzed. After treatment, resectability was 65.8% (95% CI, 55.4-75.6%) compared with 31.6% in group B (95% CI, 14.0-52.5%). A partial response was observed in patients with borderline/unresectable tumors; 31.8 (95% CI, 24.2-39.8%) in group B and 9.5% (95% CI, 2.9-19.4%) in group A (P = .003). Progressive disease was seen in 17.0% (95% CI, 11.9-22.7) of patients in group A versus 21.8% (95% CI, 10.1-36.5%) in group B (P = .006). Median survival in resected patients was 23 months for group A and 22 months for group B.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant treatment seems to have some activity in patients with borderline/unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Nearly one third of tumors initially deemed marginal for operative intervention were able to be ultimately resected after treatment. Until more effective targeted chemotherapeutics are developed, the only group of patients with pancreatic cancer that may benefit from neoadjuvant treatment are those with locally advanced disease.

Dosimetric and motion analysis of margin-intensive therapy by stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for resectable pancreatic cancer

Background

The retroperitoneal margin is a common site of positive surgical margins in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. Preoperative margin-intensive therapy (MIT) involves delivery of a single high dose of ablative radiotherapy (30 Gy) focused on this surgically inaccessible margin, utilizing stereotactic techniques in an effort to reduce local failure following surgery. In this study, we investigated the motion of regional organs at risk (OAR) utilizing 4DCT, evaluated the dosimetric effects of abdominal compression (AC) to reduce regional motion, and compared various planning techniques to optimize MIT.

Methods

10 patients were evaluated with 4DCT scans. All 10 patients had scans using AC and seven of the 10 patients had scans both with and without AC. The peak respiratory abdominal organ and major vessel centroid excursion was measured. A "sub-GTV" region was defined by a radiation oncologist and surgical oncologist encompassing the retroperitoneal margin typically lateral and posterior to the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), and a 3-5 mm margin was added to constitute the PTV. Identical 3D non-coplanar SABR (3DSABR) plans were designed for the average compression and non-compression scans. Compression scans were planned with 3DSABR, coplanar IMRT (IMRT), and Cyberknife (CK) planning techniques. Dose volume analysis was undertaken for various endpoints, comparing OAR doses with and without AC and for different planning methods.

Results

The mean PTV size was 20.2 cm³. Regional vessel motion of the SMA, celiac trunk, and renal vessels was small (< 5 mm) and not significantly impacted by AC. Mean pancreatic motion was > 5 mm, so AC has been used in all patients enrolled thus far. AC did not significantly increase OAR dose including the stomach and traverse colon. There were several statistically significant differences in the doses to OARs as a function of the type of planning modality used.

Conclusions

AC does not significantly reduce the limited motion of structures in close proximity to the MIT target and does not significantly increase the dose to OARs that can be displaced by the compression plate. The treatment planning techniques evaluated in this study have different advantages with no clearly superior method in our analysis. Dose to adjacent vessels may be reduced with 3DSABR or IMRT techniques, while conformality is increased with IMRT or CK.

Radiologic and intraoperative detection of need for mesenteric vein resection in patients with adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas

OBJECTIVE

The need for mesenteric venous resection (MVR) is determined by a combination of preoperative radiologic and intraoperative surgical assessments. A single-centre review was performed to determine how efficient these processes are in evaluating the need for MVR.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed of 343 patients who received resection for adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas, 100 of whom underwent MVR. Three radiologic signs (abutment, fat plane obliteration, focal narrowing) were evaluated for their ability to predict the need for MVR. Pathologic assessment was performed to determine if MVR had been necessary to achieve negative-margin (R0) resection. Microscopic tumour in the vein wall, or within 1 mm of the vein wall, was considered to indicate that MVR had been necessary to achieve an R0 resection.

RESULTS

Radiologic evaluation (showing any of the three signs) had sensitivity of only 60%. Overall, 40% of the patients who required MVR showed none of the signs. Specificity was 77%. A total of 80% of patients who underwent MVR had either microscopic invasion or abutment. R0 resection at the vein margin was achieved in 98% of patients in both the MVR and non-MVR groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative radiologic evaluation is not highly reliable in predicting the need for MVR. Therefore, surgical teams performing resections of cancers of the head of the pancreas must be skilled in MVR as the need for this procedure may arise unexpectedly. Surgical assessment of the need for MVR has an accuracy of about 80% and is nearly 100% accurate in determining when MVR is not required.

High expression of delta-like ligand 4 predicts poor prognosis after curative resection for pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Delta-like ligand 4 (DLL4)-Notch signaling plays a key role in tumor angiogenesis, but its prognostic value in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains unclear. Our aim was to determine whether high DLL4 expression is correlated with poor prognosis after curative resection for PDAC.

METHODS

Surgical specimens obtained from 89 patients with PDAC were immunohistochemically assessed for DLL4 and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) expression. Prognostic significance of DLL4 expression was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression. The correlations of DLL4 expression with VEGFR-2 expression, tumor stage, and lymph node metastasis were examined by chi-square test and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

There were 38 (42.7%) and 51 patients who showed high and low DLL4 expression, respectively. Survival curves showed that patients with low DLL4 expression had a significantly better survival than those with high DLL4 expression (P < .001). Multivariate survival analysis demonstrated that high DLL4 expression was independently associated with both reduced overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 2.24; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.14-4.38) and reduced progression-free survival (HR 2.37; 95% CI 1.22-4.60). Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that high DLL4 expression was independently associated with both advanced tumor stage (odds ratio [OR] 6.84; 95% CI 2.42-9.36) and lymph node metastasis (OR 3.27; 95% CI 1.04-10.34). We also found a positive correlation between DLL4 and VEGFR-2 expression (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

High DLL4 expression is significantly associated with poor prognosis for surgically resected PDAC, advanced tumor stage, and lymph node metastasis. Application of adjuvant therapy targeting DLL4-Notch signaling may improve prognosis.

[Not Available]

The authors emphasize that late results following surgery for pancreatic cancer can be improved by increasing the rate of R0 resections. Therefore, they propose a new method for pancreatic head resection, which starts with the dissection of the uncinate process and continues in a caudo-cranial direction (retrograde). Thus the superior mesenteric artery comes into view at the beginning, and the peripancreatic tissues can be removed completely along the vessel consequently. This method can potentially decrease the risk of the bleeding and major vessel injury. The authors carried out six pancreatic head resections with the technique mentioned above, and histology revealed R0 resection in all six cases. Non-traditional, retrograde dissection of the pancreatic head is a recommended method which is supported by literature data as well as the authors' own experience.

One hundred and seventy-eight consecutive pancreatoduodenectomies without mortality: role of the multidisciplinary approach

BACKGROUND

Pancreatoduodenectomy offers the only chance of cure for patients with periampullary cancers. This, however, is a major undertaking in most patients and is associated with a significant morbidity and mortality. A multidisciplinary approach to the workup and follow-up of patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy was initiated at our institution to improve the diagnosis, resection rate, mortality and morbidity. We undertook the study to assess the effect of this approach on diagnosis, resection rates and short-term outcomes such as morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

A prospective database of patients presenting with periampullary cancers to a single surgeon between April 2004 and April 2010 was reviewed. All cases were discussed at a multidisciplinary meeting comprising surgeons, gastroenterologists, radiologists, oncologists, radiation oncologists, pathologists and nursing staff. A standardized investigation and management algorithm was followed. Complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.

RESULTS

A total of 295 patients with a periampullary lesion were discussed and 178 underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (resection rate 60%). Sixty-one patients (34%) required either a vascular or an additional organ resection. Eighty-nine patients experienced complications, of which the commonest was blood transfusion (12%). Thirty-four patients (19%) had major complications, i.e. grade 3 or above. There was no in-hospital, 30-day or 60-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatoduodenectomy can safely be performed in high-volume centers with very low mortality. The surgeon's role should be careful patient selection, intensive preoperative investigations, use of a team approach, and an unbiased discussion at a multidisciplinary meeting to optimize the outcome in these patients.

Expression and prognostic value of circulating angiogenic cytokines in pancreatic cancer

Background

The utility of circulating angiogenic cytokines (CAC) as biomarkers in pancreatic cancer has not been clarified yet. We investigated the expression and prognostic associations of seven CAC in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Methods

Serum samples were collected preoperatively in patients undergoing surgery for localized pancreatic cancer (n = 74), metastatic pancreatic cancer (n = 24) or chronic pancreatitis (n = 20) and in healthy controls (n = 48). Quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and multiplex protein arrays were used to determine circulating levels of VEGF, VEGFR-1, PlGF, PDGF-AA, PDGF-BB, Ang-1 and EGF. Multivariate analyses on cancer-specific survival were performed with a Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

VEGF (p < 0.0001), PDGF-AA (p < 0.0001), Ang-1 (p = 0.002) and EGF (p < 0.0001) were differentially expressed in patients with pancreatic cancer compared to healthy controls. The presence of lymph node metastases was associated with increased levels of all CAC except for PlGF, whereas there were only minor associations of CAC with other clinicopathologic variables. The multivariate model including the entire angiogenic panel revealed high levels of circulating PDGF-AA (hazard ratio 4.58; 95% confidence interval 1.43 - 14.69) as predictor of poor cancer-specific survival, whereas high levels of PDGF-BB (0.15; 0.15 - 0.88), Ang-1 (0.30; 0.10 - 0.93) and VEGF (0.24; 0.09 - 0.57) were associated with a favorable prognosis.

Conclusion

Circulating levels of certain angiogenic cytokines correlate with patients' prognosis after resection for pancreatic cancer, if a panel of several CAC is considered simultaneously. These data should be considered in future studies evaluating angiogenic factors as prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Presence of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia in the pancreatic transection margin does not influence outcome in patients with R0 resected pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Margin status is one of the strongest prognosticators after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The clinical significance of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) at a surgical margin has not been established.

METHODS

A total of 208 patients who underwent R0 resection for PDAC between 2004 and 2008 were selected. Intraoperative frozen section slides containing the final pancreatic parenchymal transection margin were evaluated for presence or absence, number, and grade of PanINs. Data were compared to clinicopathologic factors, including patient survival.

RESULTS

PanIN lesions were present in margins in 107 of 208 patients (51.4%). Median number of PanINs per pancreatic resection margin was 1 (range, 1-11). A total of 72 patients had PanIN-1 (34.6%), 44 had PanIN-2 (21.1%), and 16 had PanIN-3 (7.2%) at their margin. Overall median survival was 17.9 (95% confidence interval, 14-21.9) months. Neither the presence nor absence of PanIN nor histological grade had any significant correlation with important clinicopathologic characteristics. There were no significant survival differences between patients with or without PanIN lesions at the resection margin or among patients with PanIN-3 (carcinoma in situ) versus lower PanIN grades. However, patients with R1 resection had a significantly worse outcome compared with patients without invasive cancer at a margin irrespective of the presence of PanIN (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of PanINs at a resection margin does not affect survival in patients who undergo R0 resection for PDAC. These results have significant clinical implications for surgeons, because no additional resection seems to be indicated when intraoperative frozen sections reveal even high-grade PanIN lesions.

Improving outcome for patients with pancreatic cancer through centralization

BACKGROUND

High-volume institutions are associated with improved clinical outcomes for pancreatic cancer. This study investigated the impact of centralizing pancreatic cancer surgery in the south of the Netherlands.

METHODS

All patients diagnosed in the Eindhoven Cancer Registry area in 1995-2000 (precentralization) and 2005-2008 (implementation of centralization agreements) with primary cancer of the pancreatic head, extrahepatic bile ducts, ampulla of Vater or duodenum were included. Resection rates, in-hospital mortality, 2-year survival and changes in treatment patterns were analysed. Multivariable regression analyses were used to identify independent risk factors for death.

RESULTS

Some 2129 patients were identified. Resection rates increased from 19·0 to 30·0 per cent (P < 0·001). The number of hospitals performing resections decreased from eight to three, and the annual number of resections per hospital increased from two to 16. The in-hospital mortality rate dropped from 24·4 to 3·6 per cent (P < 0·001) and was zero in 2008. The 2-year survival rate after surgery increased from 38·1 to 49·4 per cent (P = 0·001), and the rate irrespective of treatment increased from 10·3 to 16·0 per cent (P < 0·001). There was no improvement in 2-year survival in non-operated patients. After adjustment for relevant patient and tumour factors, those undergoing surgery more recently had a lower risk of death (hazard ratio 0·70, 95 per cent confidence interval 0·51 to 0·97). Changes in surgical patterns seemed largely to explain the improvements.

CONCLUSION

High-quality care can be achieved in regional hospitals through collaboration. Centralization should no longer be regarded as a threat by general hospitals but as a chance to improve outcomes in pancreatic cancer.

Presence of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia in the pancreatic transection margin does not influence outcome in patients with R0 resected pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Margin status is one of the strongest prognosticators after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The clinical significance of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) at a surgical margin has not been established.

METHODS

A total of 208 patients who underwent R0 resection for PDAC between 2004 and 2008 were selected. Intraoperative frozen section slides containing the final pancreatic parenchymal transection margin were evaluated for presence or absence, number, and grade of PanINs. Data were compared to clinicopathologic factors, including patient survival.

RESULTS

PanIN lesions were present in margins in 107 of 208 patients (51.4%). Median number of PanINs per pancreatic resection margin was 1 (range, 1-11). A total of 72 patients had PanIN-1 (34.6%), 44 had PanIN-2 (21.1%), and 16 had PanIN-3 (7.2%) at their margin. Overall median survival was 17.9 (95% confidence interval, 14-21.9) months. Neither the presence nor absence of PanIN nor histological grade had any significant correlation with important clinicopathologic characteristics. There were no significant survival differences between patients with or without PanIN lesions at the resection margin or among patients with PanIN-3 (carcinoma in situ) versus lower PanIN grades. However, patients with R1 resection had a significantly worse outcome compared with patients without invasive cancer at a margin irrespective of the presence of PanIN (P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of PanINs at a resection margin does not affect survival in patients who undergo R0 resection for PDAC. These results have significant clinical implications for surgeons, because no additional resection seems to be indicated when intraoperative frozen sections reveal even high-grade PanIN lesions.

Heme oxygenase-1 germ line GTn promoter polymorphism is an independent prognosticator of tumor recurrence and survival in pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) correlates with aggressive tumor behavior and chemotherapy resistance in pancreatic cancer (PC). We evaluated the prognostic value of the basal transcription controlling germ line GTn repeat polymorphism (GTn) in the promoter region of the HO-1 gene in PC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We determined the GTn in 100 controls and 150 PC patients. DNA was extracted from blood leukocytes and GTn determined by PCR, electrophoresis, and sequencing. Clinicopathological parameters, disease-free, and overall survival (DFS, OS) were correlated with GTn.

RESULTS

Three genotypes were defined based on short (S) <25 and long (L) ≥25 GTn repeat alleles. In PC patients, a steadily increasing risk was evident between LL, SL, and SS genotype patients for larger tumor size, presence of lymph node metastasis, poor tumor differentiation and higher recurrence rate (P < 0.001 each). The SS genotype displayed the most aggressive tumor biology. The LL genotype had the best and the SS genotype the worst DFS and OS (P < 0.001 each). The GTn genotype was the strongest prognostic factor for recurrence and survival (P < 0.001 each).

CONCLUSION

The GTn repeat polymorphism is a strong prognostic marker for recurrence and survival in PC patients.

CT diagnosis of recurrence after pancreatic cancer: Is there a pattern?

AIM: To investigate predilection sites of recurrence of pancreatic cancer by computed tomography (CT) in follow-up after surgery.

METHODS: Seventy seven patients with recurrence after pancreatic cancer surgery were retrospectively identified. The operative technique, R-status, T-stage and development of tumor markers were evaluated. Two radiologists analyzed CT scans with consensus readings. Location of local recurrence, lymph node recurrence and organ metastases were noted. Surgery and progression of findings on follow-up CT were considered as reference standard.

RESULTS: The mean follow-up interval was 3.9 ± 1.8 mo, with a mean relapse-free interval of 12.9 ± 10.4 mo. The predominant site of recurrence was local (65%), followed by lymph node (17%), liver metastasis (11%) and peritoneal carcinosis (7%). Local recurrence emerged at the superior mesenteric artery (n = 28), the hepatic artery (n = 8), in an area defined by the surrounding vessels: celiac trunk, portal vein, inferior vena cava (n = 22), and in a space limited by the mesenteric artery, portal vein and inferior vena cava (n = 17). Lymph node recurrence occurred in the mesenteric root and left lateral to the aorta. Recurrence was confirmed by surgery (n = 22) and follow-up CT (n = 55). Tumor markers [carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)] increased in accordance with signs of recurrence in most cases (86% CA19-9; 79.2% CEA).

CONCLUSION: Specific changes of local and lymph node recurrence can be found in the course of the cardinal peripancreatic vessels. The superior mesenteric artery is the leading structure for recurrence.

Peripancreatic fat invasion is an independent predictor of poor outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), identification of peripancreatic fat tumor invasion promotes a tumor to stage T3. We sought to understand better the impact of histological peripancreatic fat invasion on prognosis and site of recurrence in a cohort of patients with PDAC.

METHODS

We analyzed the patient demographics, outcome, and recurrence data that had been prospectively collected in 189 consecutive PDAC undergoing potentially curative pancreaticoduodenectomy between 1996 and 2009. Pathological features were reassessed for all patients. Survival outcome was compared using Kaplan-Meier/Cox proportional hazards analysis. The primary site of recurrence was defined as either locoregional or distant metastases.

RESULTS

The median survival of this PDAC cohort was 18.9 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 15.7-22.2). Histological peripancreatic fat invasion was evident in 51 (27%) patients and was associated with lymph node metastases (p = 0.004) and larger tumor size (p = 0.015). The presence of peripancreatic fat invasion was associated with reduced overall survival following resection (12.4 months [95% CI 9.9-15.0]) when compared to those patients with no evidence of fat invasion (22.6 months [95% CI 18.5-26.7]; p < 0.0001). By multivariate survival analysis, independent predictors of overall survival included tumor grade (p = 0.002), lymph node involvement (p = 0.025), resection margin status (p = 0.003), venous invasion (p = 0.045), and peripancreatic fat invasion (p = 0.007). Invasion into the pancreatic fat was significantly associated with the primary site of recurrence being locoregional failure (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Peripancreatic fat invasion was identified as being an independent predictor of poor outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy for PDAC. Additionally, the presence of peripancreatic fat invasion was associated with locoregional disease as the primary site of recurrence. This may have implications for the staging of PDAC and potentially require incorporation into future staging systems to improve outcome stratification.

Treatment of pancreatic cancer: what can we really predict today?

Managing pancreatic cancer remains a big challenge due to its worse course and prognosis. However, therapeutic options and multimodal strategies are increasing nowadays, including new agents, new regimens and chemoradiation. Recently, the FOLFIRTNOX regimen has been reported to be more active than gemcitabine in selected metastatic patients. In this setting, it will be of utmost interest to guide our therapeutic choice not only on clinical and pathological findings, but also on specific biomarkers that will predict tumor behavior and patient outcome (prognostic markers), and benefit from specific agents or regimens (predictive markers). In the near future, we will have to build both our therapeutic interventions and our clinical research based on an accurate patients' clinical selection and on biomolecular markers. In this review, we aimed to highlight and discuss some of the recent results reported on biomarkers in pancreatic cancer that may predict, i.e., preferential metastatic diffusion after surgery, like CXCR4, or predict gemcitabine efficacy in an adjuvant setting as well as in advanced disease, like hENT1. An important effort for translational research in pancreatic cancer research is thus required to validate such markers, while some important questions concerning tissue availability and processing, methodology of analysis, and design of future prospective trials, need to be addressed.

Current opinion on lymphadenectomy in pancreatic cancer surgery

BACKGROUND

Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas exhibits aggressive behavior in growth, inducing an extremely poor prognosis with an overall median 5-year survival rate of only 1%-4%. Curative resection is the only potential therapeutic opportunity.

DATA SOURCES

A PubMed search of relevant articles published up to 2009 was performed to identify information about the value of lymphadenectomy and its extent in curative resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS

Despite recent advances in chemotherapy, radiotherapy or even immunotherapy, surgery still remains the major factor that affects the outcome. The initial promising performance in Japan gave conflicting results in Western countries for the extended and more radical pancreatectomy; it has failed to prove beneficial. Four prospective, randomized trials on extended versus standard lymphadenectomy during pancreatic cancer surgery have shown no improvement in long-term survival by the extended resection. The exact lymph node status, including malignant spread and the total number retrieved as well as the lymph node ratio, is the most important prognostic factor. Positive lymph nodes after pancreatectomy are present in 70%. Paraaortic lymph node spread indicates poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Undoubtedly, a standard lymphadenectomy including >15 lymph nodes must be no longer preferred in patients with the usual head location. The extended lymphadenectomy does not have any place, unless in randomized trials. In cases with body or tail location, the radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy gives promising results. Nevertheless, accurate localization and detailed examination of the resected specimen are required for better staging.