The relationship of the orientation of the transverse acetabular ligament and acetabular labrum to the suggested safe zones of cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

There is a need to develop and validate a method for establishing cup orientation that is patient specific and independent of the anterior pelvic plane. It is our hypothesis that the transverse acetabular ligament and acetabular labrum can be used to do this. The objective of this study is to define the orientation of the plane formed by the transverse acetabular ligament and acetabular labrum and to examine whether these local landmarks lie within the limits of acceptance for cup positioning.

METHODS

Twenty-five consecutive patients, who were being investigated for labral tears with a MRI arthrogram of the hip, were enrolled in this prospective study. The orientation of the transverse acetabular ligament-labrum plane was determined by manually selecting points on the transverse acetabular ligament and labrum. The best-fit plane through these points was determined and its operative orientation expressed with respect to a constructed pelvic coordinate system.

RESULTS

The operative anteversion of the transverse acetabular ligament-labrum plane ranged from 5.3-36.1 inverted exclamation mark (mean 23.0 inverted exclamation mark + or - 7.4 inverted exclamation mark standard deviation). The inclination ranged from 38.4-50.3 inverted exclamation mark (mean 45.6 inverted exclamation mark + or - 3.2 inverted exclamation mark standard deviation).

CONCLUSIONS

The transverse acetabular ligament and acetabular labrum offer a possible solution to the many difficulties involved in cup placement during total hip arthroplasty. This paper highlights the variation in the orientation of these local acetabular landmarks and questions the logic of a set target for cup positioning.

Impingement as a mechanism of dissociation of a metasul metal-on-metal liner

This case report is of a patient with disassociation of the acetabular cup liner caused by impingement. The cup inclination (39 degrees) and anteversion (24 degrees) were good as measured by computer navigation. Impingement occurred because the head-neck ratio was 2.0, and the hip length and offset were short by one head length. Successful revision without intraoperative impingement was accomplished with one size head larger (32 mm; head-neck ratio, 2.3) and one size longer to correct hip length and offset.

Evaluation of component positioning in primary total hip arthroplasty using an imageless navigation device compared with traditional methods

Acetabular orientation affects the success of total hip arthroplasty. Computer-assisted navigation systems may reduce positional errors. Total hip arthroplasty results were analyzed using an imageless navigation system. We hypothesized that reliability and accuracy would improve. One hundred forty-nine total hip arthroplasties were performed using minimally invasive surgical techniques in 3 cohorts: manual (n = 53), initial navigation cases (n = 49), navigation second series (n = 47). Manual patients' cup orientation variation from desired range was -19 degrees to +18 degrees anteversion (SD, 9.1 degrees ), -11 degrees to +25 degrees abduction (SD, 6.7 degrees ). Navigation variation from desired was -18 degrees to +15 degrees (SD, 7.3 degrees ) in group 1 and -15 degrees to +9 degrees (SD, 5.9 degrees ) in group 2 in anteversion and -15 degrees to +13 degrees (SD, 6.1 degrees ) in group 1 and -15 degrees to +11 degrees (SD, 4.7 degrees ) in group 2 in abduction. Results were statistically significant. There were significant differences for operating room time and estimated blood loss, but not incision size or body mass index. Navigation provided controlled, reproducible acetabular alignment; but a learning curve existed in terms of accuracy, estimated blood loss, and operating room time.

Imaging and navigation measurement of acetabular component position in THA

There are six different definitions of acetabular position based on observed inclination and anteversion made in either the (1) anterior pelvic plane or (2) coronal planes and based on whether each of the observations made in one of these two planes is (1) anatomic, (2) operative, or (3) radiographic. Anteroposterior pelvic tilt is the angle between the anterior pelvic plane and the coronal plane of the body. The coronal plane is a functional plane and the anterior pelvic plane is an anatomic pelvic plane. A cup may be in the "safe zone" by one definition but may be out of the "safe zone" by another definition. We reviewed published studies, analyzed the difference in varying definitions, evaluated the influence of the anterior pelvic tilt, and provided methods to convert from one definition to another. We recommend all inclination and anteversion measurements be converted to the radiographic inclination and anteversion based on the coronal plane, which is equivalent to the inclination and anteversion on the anteroposterior pelvic radiograph.

Computer-assisted versus manual alignment in THA: a probabilistic approach to range of motion

Dislocation remains a major complication after THA, and range of motion before impingement is important in joint stability. Variability in implant alignment affects resultant range of motion. We used a probabilistic modeling approach to assess the effects of implant alignment variability based on manual and computer-assisted surgical (CAS) techniques on resultant range of motion after THA. We implemented a contact detection algorithm within a probabilistic analysis framework. The normally distributed alignment variables (mean +/- 1 standard deviation) were cup abduction (manual = 45 degrees +/- 7.6 degrees , CAS = 45 degrees +/- 5.7 degrees ), cup anteversion (manual = 20 degrees +/- 9.6 degrees , CAS = 20 degrees +/- 4.5 degrees ), and stem anteversion (manual and CAS = 10 degrees +/- 1.5 degrees ). The outcomes of the probabilistic analysis were range of motion distributions with 1% and 99% bounds. The upper bounds of motion for manual and CAS alignment were similar because bony impingement was the limiting factor. The lower bounds of range of motion were substantially different depending on the type of surgical alignment; manual alignment produced a smaller range of motion in 3% to 5% of cases. CAS implant alignment produced range of motion values above minimum acceptable levels in all cases simulated.

Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty

Combined cup and stem anteversion in THA based on femoral anteversion has been suggested as a method to compensate for abnormal femoral anteversion. We investigated the combined anteversion technique using computer navigation. In 47 THAs, the surgeon first estimated the femoral broach anteversion and validated the position by computer navigation. The broach was then measured with navigation. The navigation screen was blocked while the surgeon estimated the anteversion of the broach. This provided two estimates of stem anteversion. The navigated stem anteversion was validated by postoperative CT scans. All cups were implanted using navigation alone. We determined precision (the reproducibility) and bias (how close the average test number is to the true value) of the stem position. Comparing the surgeon estimate to navigation anteversion, the precision of the surgeon was 16.8 degrees and bias was 0.2 degrees ; comparing the navigation of the stem to postoperative CT anteversion, the precision was 4.8 degrees and bias was 0.2 degrees , meaning navigation is accurate. Combined anteversion by postoperative CT scan was 37.6 degrees +/- 7 degrees (standard deviation) (range, 19 degrees -50 degrees ). The combined anteversion with computer navigation was within the safe zone of 25 degrees to 50 degrees for 45 of 47 (96%) hips. Femoral stem anteversion had a wide variability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Optimal orientation of implanted components in total hip arthroplasty with polyethylene on metal articulation

BACKGROUND

In many studies related to the total hip arthroplasty, it has been found that incorrect alignment of the total hip component is one of the major factors influencing mechanical failures. Although various recommendations for cup orientation have been presented, there were few studies that seek to determine a proper orientation of the implants based on the human motion data. The objective of this study is to determine an optimum orientation of the hip implant considering various daily activities.

METHODS

Firstly, the cup orientations free of impingement were calculated for a given set of implant geometric parameters and the required range of motion for daily activities measured in 10 subjects. Next, the optimum values for the cup orientation and stem anteversion avoiding impingement and minimizing cup wear were determined for the proposed motion criteria.

FINDINGS

Different cup orientation was obtained as optimum for each combination of the neck angles (40 degrees and 50 degrees) and oscillation angles (120 degrees and 135 degrees). The corresponding optimum stem anteversion was also different when different neck angle was used.

INTERPRETATION

As the margin for the impingement-free orientation of the cup was small, the optimum cup orientation and stem anteversion should be adopted specific for each combination of the neck angle and oscillation angle.

The combined anteversion technique for acetabular component anteversion

The combined anteversion technique for acetabular component placement of total hip arthroplasty is beneficial because of the surgeons' limited ability to control the anteversion of a cementless femoral stem. Our data show that the cementless stem anteversion can be 15 degrees different than anticipated. By determining femoral stem anteversion before positioning cup anteversion, the cup anteversion can be adjusted for the stem anteversion. The combined anteversion technique should provide a mean near 35 degrees with a safe zone of 25 degrees to 50 degrees.

An in vivo model for intraoperative assessment of impingement and dislocation in total hip arthroplasty

We have developed an intraoperative model to quantify total hip arthroplasty impingement and dislocation mechanics using fluoroscopy and shape-matching techniques. Two patient groups were investigated: group 1 consisted of 12 hips using 28- or 32-mm femoral heads and an anterolateral surgical approach, and group 2 consisted of 17 hips using 22- or 26-mm femoral heads and a posterolateral surgical approach. During intraoperative hip stability testing consisting of extension and external rotation motions, group 1 was more unstable, and prosthetic impingement was the major reason for dislocation. With flexion and internal rotation motions, group 2 was more unstable, and superior-lateral impingement or soft tissue traction was the major reason for dislocation. Intraoperative quantitative assessment of hip mechanics provides a safe and clinically relevant method to characterize potential complications and evolve techniques to prevent them.

Results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing dysplasia component in severe acetabular insufficiency

The dysplasia cup, which was devised as an adjunct to the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing system, has a hydroxyapatite-coated porous surface and two supplementary neutralisation screws to provide stable primary fixation, permit early weight-bearing, and allow incorporation of morcellised autograft without the need for structural bone grafting.

A total of 110 consecutive dysplasia resurfacing arthroplasties in 103 patients (55 men and 48 women) performed between 1997 and 2000 was reviewed with a minimum follow-up of six years. The mean age at operation was 47.2 years (21 to 62) and 104 hips (94%) were Crowe grade II or III.

During the mean follow-up of 7.8 years (6 to 9.6), three hips (2.7%) were converted to a total hip replacement at a mean of 3.9 years (2 months to 8.1 years), giving a cumulative survival of 95.2% at nine years (95% confidence interval 89 to 100). The revisions were due to a fracture of the femoral neck, a collapse of the femoral head and a deep infection. There was no aseptic loosening or osteolysis of the acetabular component associated with either of the revisions performed for failure of the femoral component. No patient is awaiting a revision.

The median Oxford hip score in 98 patients with surviving hips at the final review was 13 and the 10th and the 90th percentiles were 12 and 23, respectively.

THA using an anatomic stem in patients with femoral head osteonecrosis

Treating young patients with femoral head osteonecrosis (ON) remains challenging. Anatomic stems were introduced in the 1980s and 1990s to improve the proximal canal fit in an attempt to enhance long-term implant survival, an important aspect of treating young patients. We began using one design in 1993 and asked three questions to confirm whether the design criteria improved outcomes in patients with ON: (1) What is the long term survivorship of these implants?; (2) What is the amount and rate of wear?; and (3) What is the incidence of osteolysis? We retrospectively reviewed 56 patients (69 hips) who underwent THA for femoral head ON with a cementless anatomic stem proximally coated with hydroxyapatite. Four patients (four hips) were lost to followup and 16 patients (19 hips) died. In the remaining 36 patients (46 hips) the minimum followup was 10 years (mean, 11.2 years; range, 10-13 years). The mean age at operation was 48.6 years. The average Harris hip score at last followup was 87 points. Worst-case survivorship was 58.1% at 13 years and best-case was 93.3%. The average linear wear of the polyethylene liner was 2.02 mm and the average annual wear was 0.18 mm per year. Thirty-seven hips (80%) had femoral osteolysis and 14 (30%) had acetabular osteolysis. One patient who had extensive femoral osteolysis and stem loosening was revised at 11.2 years postoperatively. The high rates of polyethylene wear and osteolysis are of concern.

Bony impingement affects range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: A subject-specific approach

Hip range of motion after total hip arthroplasty has been shown to be dependent on prosthetic design and component placement. We hypothesized that bony anatomy would significantly affect range of motion. Computer models of a current generation hip arthroplasty design were virtually implanted in a model of pelvis and femur in various orientations ranging from 35 degrees to 55 degrees cup abduction, 0 degrees to 30 degrees cup anteversion, and 0 degrees to 30 degrees femoral anteversion. Four head sizes ranging from 22.2 to 32 mm and two neck sizes ranging from 10-mm and 12-mm diameter were tested. Range of motion was recorded as maximum flexion-extension, abduction-adduction, and axial rotation of the femur before any contact between prosthetic components or bone was detected. Bony impingement preceded component impingement in about 44% of all conditions tested, ranging from 66% in adduction to 22% in extension. Range of motion increased as head size increased. However, increasing head size also increased the propensity for bony impingement, which tended to reduce the beneficial effect of increased head size on range of motion. Reducing neck diameter had a greater effect on prosthetic impingement (mean, 3.5 degrees increase in range of motion) compared to bone impingement (mean, 1.9 degrees ). This model allowed for a clinically relevant assessment of range of motion after total hip arthroplasty and may also be used with patient-specific geometry [such as that obtained from preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans] for more accurate preoperative planning.

Resolving inconsistencies in defining the target orientation for the acetabular cup angles in total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Dislocation following total hip arthroplasty is a major complication and malorientation of the acetabular cup is one of the primary factors affecting dislocation. Different conventions used to describe the cup orientation produce significant variations in the recommendations for correct positioning, which in turn make it difficult for clinicians to properly interpret and apply previously reported studies.

METHODS

We examined nine articles presenting recommendations for the range of target orientations of the acetabular cup to minimize the risk of dislocation (referred to as the 'safe zone'). Those studies included five ways to define the cup orientation and two methods to define the reference frame. We converted those recommendations to a single representation based on the radiographic angles expressed in the pelvic frame reference.

FINDINGS

After conversion, the mean recommended anteversion angle was shifted downward by 5 degrees (P<0.01). Also, the target orientation recommendations became more consistent, especially for the anteversion angles where the standard errors of the upper and lower limits were reduced by 61% (P=0.02) and 23% (P=0.04), respectively.

INTERPRETATION

The choice of reference frame and the definition for acetabular cup orientation angles can have a significant effect on the target orientation for the acetabular cup. Recommendations for the target orientation should always explicitly state which reference frame and angle definition is being used. The averaged recommendation of the studies assessed here is 41 degrees inclination and 16 degrees anteversion in radiographic angles or 39 degrees inclination and 21 degrees anteversion in operative angles, both expressed in the pelvic reference frame.

Isolated fracture of the ceramic head after third-generation alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

While most reports of component fracture following alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty have involved the acetabular liner, few have involved fracture of the alumina femoral head. In the present multicenter study, we investigated ceramic head fractures in a cohort of patients who underwent third-generation alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 312 patients (367 hips) who underwent alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty without cement at four participating centers with the use of a 28-mm BIOLOX forte femoral head and a BIOLOX forte liner from July 2001 to October 2003. Three hundred and five patients (359 hips) were evaluated at a mean of forty-five months postoperatively. Clinical follow-up with use of the Harris hip score and radiographic evaluation were performed at six weeks; at three, six, and twelve months; and every six months thereafter. Retrieved ceramic implants were examined by means of visual inspection.

RESULTS

Five hips (1.4%) in five patients were revised because of a ceramic head fracture during the follow-up period. The ceramic head fractures occurred during normal daily activities at a mean of 22.6 months postoperatively. A short neck had been used in all five hips in which a fracture occurred, compared with 121 (34.2%) of the 354 hips in which a fracture did not occur (p = 0.009). The fracture involved a circular crack along the circumference of the thinnest portion of the head component at the proximal edge of the bore. The fracture also involved multiple vertical cracks extending radially along the longitudinal axis from the circumference of the circular crack line to the lower edge of the head component.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, the rate of ceramic head fracture associated with one design of a short-neck modular alumina femoral head was 1.4% (five of 359). The extent to which these findings are generalizable to other designs that utilize this type of femoral head is unknown.

The influence of acetabular component position on wear in total hip arthroplasty

Our experience has implicated cup inclination as an important factor in wear, whereas others have suggested that the hip center of rotation (COR) must be closely reestablished to reduce wear. We conducted a retrospective study to determine the relative importance of these 2 factors. One hundred thirty-nine total hip arthroplasties were studied after a mean follow-up of 9.2 years (range, 6-3 years). Forty-nine of 139 operated hips had a contralateral normal hip, which allowed the most accurate measurement of the influence of change in the COR. Wear was related to the inclination of the cup but not to a change in the COR. Secondarily, wear was less with a ceramic-polyethylene polyarticular surface than with metal-polyethylene. The importance of this data is related to cup implantation techniques. The hip COR can be moved superiorly and/or medially to permit cup inclination below 45 degrees with correct cup coverage.

Precision and bias of imageless computer navigation and surgeon estimates for acetabular component position

Computer navigation has the potential to permit accurate placement of components. We first hypothesized acetabular inclination and anteversion using navigation would be within 5 degrees of postoperative computed tomography scans, then secondly, computer precision would be better than that of surgeons. In the first phase, we obtained postoperative CT scans in 30 hips to ascertain the computer navigation values for inclination and anteversion of the cup. In the second phase, in 99 patients with 101 hips, we determined the surgeon's precision by comparing surgeons' blind estimates for trial cup position with computer navigation values. The navigation precision for inclination was 4.4 degrees with a bias of 0.03 degrees and for anteversion was 4.1 degrees with a bias of 0.73 degrees. The experienced surgeons' precision was 11.5 degrees for inclination and 12.3 degrees for anteversion, whereas the less experienced surgeons' precision was 13.1 degrees for inclination and 13.9 degrees for anteversion. The data supported the first hypothesis as computer navigation had a bias for inclination and anteversion of less than 1 degrees with precision less than 5 degrees. The precision of computer navigation was better than that of surgeons. This imageless computer navigation system allows more accurate acetabular component placement.

Containment versus impingement: finding a compromise for cup placement in total hip arthroplasty

Recommendations for cup containment and impingement may provide conflicting directions for component orientation in total hip arthroplasty. For optimal containment, the cup is positioned with respect to the acetabular bone, resulting in coincidence of the rim of the cup and the acetabulum. This results in good coverage and symmetric load transfer, leading to good long-term stability, but occasionally necessitates more abduction of the cup than that recommended by the safe zone. On the other hand, placement of the cup for an optimal range of motion would lead to only partial containment, with a higher risk of component loosening and revision. The most effective compromise is to use a prosthesis that has a large safe zone, realised by a high head-to-neck ratio, and orienting the cup such that a good containment is achieved and the safe zone is respected. Computer navigation or smart aiming devices may help to find the best relative orientation.

Factors affecting hip range of motion in surface replacement arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Surface replacement arthroplasty aims to re-create normal hip biomechanics; however the pathoanathomy of the hip, prosthetic component design, surgical technique and other factors may have a significant impact on the range of motion restoration attained following surface replacement arthroplasty. However, there is paucity of information on the effect of such factors.

METHODS

A computerized three-dimensional hip model was created from preoperative computerized tomography images of a patient who was scheduled for a surface replacement arthroplasty. The effects of the femoral component size, translation and orientation on the range of motion were analysed as was the effect of increasing the seating depth and modification of the version of the acetabular component.

FINDINGS

Increasing the femoral component size led to global improvement in range of motion while translation increased range of motion in one direction but reduced it in the opposite direction. Change in the femoral component orientation had minimal effects on range of motion in comparison to the effect of changes in the version of the acetabular component. Increasing the seating depth of the acetabulum only caused reduced range of motion in internal rotation in 90 degrees flexion.

INTERPRETATION

To restore hip range of motion, surgeons performing surface replacement arthroplasty should aim to reproduce the natural femoral head-neck offset. Although increasing the femoral component size may achieve this, more acetabular bone will be resected. Knowing the specific zones of impingement of each arc of movement, selective translation of the femoral component or femoral neck osteoplasty can restore femoral neck offset in more critical areas without affecting acetabular bone stock. Over deepening of the acetabulum or leaving rim osteophytes should also be avoided to prevent impingement.

Computed tomography-based navigation to determine the socket location in total hip arthroplasty of an osteoarthritis hip with a large leg length discrepancy due to severe acetabular dysplasia

For osteoarthritis hips due to severe acetabular dysplasia such as Crowe type 3 or 4, placement of the socket is a difficult procedure in total hip arthroplasty. Because the acetabular bone stock is poor, suitable location for the socket is very limited with respect to achieving good coverage with the host bone. A 51-year-old woman who had an osteoarthritis hip with a large leg length discrepancy due to severe acetabular dysplasia required total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of the total hip arthroplasty was to improve the hip disorder as well as to reduce the leg length discrepancy to achieve good gait function. We present technical solutions to aid the surgeons in placing the acetabular socket at the proper location by using computed tomography-based navigation system.

Anatomic hip range of motion after implantation during total hip arthroplasty as measured by a navigation system

Simulation of prosthetic impingement is important for preventing complications after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although the anatomical hip range of motion (ROM) in patients after THA is an essential parameter for these simulations, previous simulation studies substituted various clinical hip ROMs for the anatomical hip ROM. Using a navigation system, anatomical hip ROM was accurately assessed after implantation during primary THA in 30 patients. We found that the hip could be passively moved to 113 degrees of flexion, 34 degrees of extension, 46 degrees of abduction, 75 degrees of internal rotation, and 36 degrees of external rotation. Almost all reference hip ROMs used in previous simulations were smaller than these values. Therefore, wider hip ROM values should be used as parameters for such simulations.

Range of motion measurement of an artificial hip joint using CT images

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most effective treatments for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Dislocation of the femoral head from the acetabular socket is a major problem of THA. To prevent dislocation, it is important to know the range of motion (ROM) after THA. Although various studies on the ROM were carried out, there exist only a few reports on ROM evaluation in individual patients. This is because in clinical cases, bone-to-bone and bone-to-component contacts must be considered besides the impingement of components. In this study, a new method for evaluating ROM of internal/external rotation, which takes into account all combinations of contacts between the bones and components, was proposed. A computer simulation demonstrated that the RMS error of the proposed method was approximately 3 degrees . The method was applied to 33 THAs under various conditions of flexion and adduction angles. The method was able to detect any type of impingement. The evaluated ROM was in good agreement with that measured during the THA operation (correlation coefficient = 0.91).

Mid-term results of cementless total hip replacement using a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing with and without computer navigation

We have developed a CT-based navigation system using infrared light-emitting diode markers and an optical camera. We used this system to perform cementless total hip replacement using a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing couple in 53 patients (60 hips) between 1998 and 2001. We reviewed 52 patients (59 hips) at a mean of six years (5 to 8) postoperatively. The mid-term results of total hip replacement using navigation were compared with those of 91 patients (111 hips) who underwent this procedure using the same implants, during the same period, without navigation. There were no significant differences in age, gender, diagnosis, height, weight, body mass index, or pre-operative clinical score between the two groups. The operation time was significantly longer where navigation was used, but there was no significant difference in blood loss or navigation-related complications. With navigation, the acetabular components were placed within the safe zone defined by Lewinnek, while without, 31 of the 111 components were placed outside this zone. There was no significant difference in the Merle d'Aubigne and Postel hip score at the final follow-up. However, hips treated without navigation had a higher rate of dislocation. Revision was performed in two cases undertaken without navigation, one for aseptic acetabular loosening and one for fracture of a ceramic liner, both of which showed evidence of neck impingement on the liner. A further five cases undertaken without navigation showed erosion of the posterior aspect of the neck of the femoral component on the lateral radiographs. These seven impingement-related mechanical problems correlated with malorientation of the acetabular component. There were no such mechanical problems in the navigated group. We conclude that CT-based navigation increased the precision of orientation of the acetabular component and control of limb length in total hip replacement, without navigation-related complications. It also reduced the rate of dislocation and mechanical problems related to impingement.

Comparison of fluoroscopic and imageless registration in surgical navigation of the acetabular component

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the repeatability and reproducibility of acetabular component positioning using imageless and fluoroscopic-referenced navigation methods.

METHODS

A single cadaveric pelvis had a modular acetabular component securely fixed. Cup position was evaluated using imageless and fluoroscopic registration techniques. These were compared to measurements of a coordinate measuring machine (CMM) and a validated CT scan protocol.

RESULTS

The CMM-determined anatomical acetabular inclination measurement was 46.02 degrees (SD = 1.07), while the CMM-determined anatomical anteversion (pubic symphysis) was 15.79 degrees (SD = 0.41). Computed tomography revealed inclination of 42.2 degrees (SD = 0.65); anteversion with pubic tubercle referencing of 12.1 degrees (SD = 0.14); and anteversion with pubic symphysis referencing of 14.3 degrees (SD = 0.89). Evaluation of repeatability (one surgeon; n = 8) with the imageless system (pubic tubercle) revealed inclination of 41.8 degrees (SD = 0.46) and anteversion of 11.2 degrees (SD = 0.8). For the fluoroscopic system (pubic symphysis), inclination was 42.8 degrees (SD = 1.6) and anteversion was 17.6 degrees (SD = 3.1). Evaluation of reproducibility (three surgeons; n = 24) with the imageless system revealed inclination of 41.8 degrees (SD = 0.82) and anteversion of 15.2 degrees (SD = 1.06). For the fluoroscopic system, inclination was 48.5 degrees (SD = 0.9) and anteversion was 17.8 degrees (SD = 2.5). Imageless referencing of cup inclination and anteversion were found to be process capable using the Six Sigma Cp and Cpk capability indices. Fluoroscopic referencing was process capable for cup inclination but not for cup anteversion (Cp - 1.1; Cpk - 1.0). An F-test revealed significantly greater variance with fluoroscopic referenced anteversion (p < 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Imageless referencing was process capable for computer navigation of cup placement in the ex-vivo setting. Fluoroscopic referencing for pelvic landmarks is problematic as locating points from radiographic images is difficult, especially for cup anteversion.

Fiabilité limitée du plan pelvien antérieur pour l’implantation assistée par informatique de la cupule d’une prothèse totale de hanche

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The anterior pelvic plane, also called the Lewinnek plane, is commonly used as the reference plane to guide imageless computer assisted surgery for total hip arthroplasty (THA) because this plane is considered to be globally vertical in the standing position. To our knowledge, no study has evaluated this hypothesis or the potential variations in orientation as a function of gender, position of the subject, or THA insertion. The purpose of this work was to examine these different hypotheses in a radio-clinical study.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The orientation of the anterior pelvic plane was measured in relation to the vertical plane on plain lateral x-rays of the pelvis in the standing position. X-rays were studied for 106 patients: 1) 82 patients with a THA (40 with at least one dislocation, 42 with a stable hip selected randomly, 19 with a standing lateral x-ray before and after arthroplasty) and 24 control subjects for whom lateral images were obtained in the supine and standing positions to assess potential position-related changes in orientation.

RESULTS

The orientation of the anterior pelvic plane was not affected by gender or age. The anterior pelvic plane formed an angle greater than 5 degrees with the vertical plane in 38% of patients and more than 10 degrees in 13%. The orientation of the anterior pelvic plane was not significantly different between the study groups (control versus THA) nor between the THA groups (stable versus dislocated). The supine position modified significantly the orientation of the anterior pelvic plane which changed on average from 1.20 degrees to -2.25 degrees ; the change was greater than 7 degrees in twelve subjects. Implantation of a THA did not modify signi-ficantly the orientation of the anterior pelvic plane in the standing position for the 19 subjects [the variations were small (-1 degrees to 7 degrees on average, range -21 degrees to 8 degrees ) but greater than 5 degrees for 7 of 19 subjects].

DISCUSSION

Most teams use the anterior pelvic plane to guide computer-assisted navigation, considering that this plane is vertical in the standing position. Our findings show however that this is not true for 38% of subjects with a margin of error of 10 degrees , i.e. about half of the anatomic anteversion of the acetabulum. Moving to the standing position would produce a significant variation in the orientation of the anterior plane of the pelvis. This is a source of error which has not been integrated into most imageless navigation systems. Similarly variations in the position of the pelvis from the standing to sitting and supine positions which can produce impingement or dislocation have not been taken into consideration.

CONCLUSION

Variations in the orientation of the anterior pelvic plane in relation to the vertical would suggest that this plane is not a reliable reference. To our knowledge, there is no reliable reference which can be easily identified during the operation which would take into account variations in the position of the pelvis. We thus believe it would be preferable to attempt to operate without a reference plane, relying on a more kinematic approach to guide computer-assisted implantation of the THA cup.

Difference between 2 measurement methods of version angles of the acetabular component

We evaluated the relationship and the difference between measurements of version angles (VAs) of the acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty taken using 2 different methods. One VA was measured on an anteroposterior radiograph of the hip joint (VAP) and the other on a cross-table lateral radiograph (VCL) in 97 hips after surgery (clinical data) and 6 sawbone pelvic models (model data). There was a positive correlation between VAP and VCL for both data. Mean and standard deviation of the differences (VCL - VAP) between the 2 measurements were 5 degrees +/- 4.2 degrees in clinical data and -0.01 degrees +/- 0.32 degrees in model data. These differences on clinical data should be taken into consideration when comparing VAs in the literature using different measuring methods.

Impingement with total hip replacement

Impingement is a cause of poor outcomes of prosthetic hip arthroplasty; it can lead to instability, accelerated wear, and unexplained pain. Impingement is influenced by prosthetic design, component position, biomechanical factors, and patient variables. Evidence linking impingement to dislocation and accelerated wear comes from implant retrieval studies. Operative principles that maximize an impingement-free range of motion include correct combined acetabular and femoral anteversion and an optimal head-neck ratio. Operative techniques for preventing impingement include medialization of the cup to avoid component impingement and restoration of hip offset and length to avoid osseous impingement.

Poor accuracy of freehand cup positioning during total hip arthroplasty

Several studies have demonstrated a correlation between the acetabular cup position and the risk of dislocation, wear and range of motion after total hip arthroplasty. The present study was designed to evaluate the accuracy of the surgeon's estimated position of the cup after freehand placement in total hip replacement. Peroperative estimated abduction and anteversion of 200 acetabular components (placed by three orthopaedic surgeons and nine residents) were compared with measured outcomes (according to Pradhan) on postoperative radiographs. Cups were placed in 49.7 degrees (SD 6.7) of abduction and 16.0 degrees (SD 8.1) of anteversion. Estimation of placement was 46.3 degrees (SD 4.3) of abduction and 14.6 degrees (SD 5.9) of anteversion. Of more interest is the fact that for the orthopaedic surgeons the mean inaccuracy of estimation was 4.1 degrees (SD 3.9) for abduction and 5.2 degrees (SD 4.5) for anteversion and for their residents this was respectively, 6.3 degrees (SD 4.6) and 5.7 degrees (SD 5.0). Significant differences were found between orthopaedic surgeons and residents for inaccuracy of estimation for abduction, not for anteversion. Body mass index, sex, (un)cemented fixation and surgical approach (anterolateral or posterolateral) were not significant factors. Based upon the inaccuracy of estimation, the group's chance on future cup placement within Lewinnek's safe zone (5-25 degrees anteversion and 30-50 degrees abduction) is 82.7 and 85.2% for anteversion and abduction separately. When both parameters are combined, the chance of accurate placement is only 70.5%. The chance of placement of the acetabular component within 5 degrees of an intended position, for both abduction and anteversion is 21.5% this percentage decreases to just 2.9% when the tolerated error is 1 degrees . There is a tendency to underestimate both abduction and anteversion. Orthopaedic surgeons are superior to their residents in estimating abduction of the acetabular component. The results of this study indicate that freehand placement of the acetabular component is not a reliable method.

A computer model of the position of the combined component in the prevention of impingement in total hip replacement

Dislocation remains a major concern after total hip replacement, and is often attributed to malposition of the components. The optimum position for placement of the components remains uncertain. We have attempted to identify a relatively safe zone in which movement of the hip will occur without impingement, even if one component is positioned incorrectly. A three-dimensional computer model was designed to simulate impingement and used to examine 125 combinations of positioning of the components in order to allow maximum movement without impingement. Increase in acetabular and/or femoral anteversion allowed greater internal rotation before impingement occurred, but decreases the amount of external rotation. A decrease in abduction of the acetabular components increased internal rotation while decreasing external rotation. Although some correction for malposition was allowable on the opposite side of the joint, extreme degrees could not be corrected because of bony impingement.

We introduce the concept of combined component position, in which anteversion and abduction of the acetabular component, along with femoral anteversion, are all defined as critical elements for stability.

Ceramic liner fracture after cementless alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty

Advances in technology have reduced the risk of fracture of ceramic total hip arthroplasty implants, but concerns remain about fracture of both components. We retrospectively reviewed 133 patients (157 hips) who had cementless alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasties with a sandwich-type acetabular component. Six patients (seven hips) died and five patients (six hips) were interviewed by telephone (95% followup). The 122 patients (144 hips) examined had a minimum followup of 36 months (average, 45 months; range, 36-68 months). All acetabular cups and femoral stems were radiographically stable at the last followup. Five hips in five patients (3.5%) were revised because of ceramic liner fractures. Ceramic liner fractures occurred at a mean of 35 months (range, 24-48 months) postoperatively. Acetabular cups in the fracture group (n = 5) were more anteverted than those in the nonfracture group (n = 139). In three patients the fracture apparently occurred during squatting, resulting in hyperflexion and wide hip abduction. Early ceramic liner fracture was associated with impingement associated with excessive anteversion of the acetabular cup in Korean patients who habitually squat.

Positionnement acétabulaire assisté par ordinateur dans les prothèses totales de hanche

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

Actetabular component malpositioning during total hip arthroplasty (THA) increases the risk of dislocation, reduces the range of motion, and can be the cause of early wear and loosening. There have been numerous reports on the optimal orientation of the acebaular component in THA. Lewinnek et al recommended an abduction angle of 40+/-10 degrees and an anteversion of 15+/-10 degrees for cup alignment in THA. In order to prevent malpostioned hip implants and improve the reproducibility of implant alignment in THA, numerous computer-assisted orthopedic systems have been described, using computed tomography (CT)-base or imageless navigation. Among the imageless systems available, one is based on Bone Morphing technology initially described by Stindel for computer-assisted knee arthroplasty and adapted for THA. The purpose of this study was to compare computer-assisted acetabular component insertion versus free hand placement.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A controlled randomized matched prospective study was performed in two groups of 30 patients. The study was approved by the French Ethics Committee. In the first group, cup positioning was assisted by an imageless computer-assisted orthopedics system based on Bone Morphing(R) (CAOS+ group). In the control group, cup placement was free hand (CAOS- group). The same cementless cup was used in both groups. The same surgeon performed all procedures using an anterolateral approach. Cup anteversion and abduction angles were measured on 3D CT scan reconstructions obtained postoperatively for each patient by an independent observer using a special cup evaluation software.

RESULTS

There were 16 males and 14 females in each group, mean age was 62 years (range 24-80) years, and mean body mass index was 25 in each group. Mean additional time of the CAOS procedure was 12 minutes (range 8-20). Intraoperative subjective agreement of the surgeon with the computer guidance system demonstrated a high correlation in 23 cases, a weak correlation in six cases and poor correlation in one case. There were no statistical differences between the CAOS+ and the CAOS- group regarding means of the abduction and anteversion angles, but a significant range of variance, the lowest variations being observed in the CAOS+ group.

DISCUSSION

This study has shown the accuracy of cup positioning using a CT-free navigation system in a prospective randomized controlled protocol.

Experimental validation of noninvasive referencing in navigated procedures on long bones

Navigation procedures in orthopedic surgery require fixation of reference markers to the anatomic region of interest. Inadequate fixation might lead to micromotion or loosening of the reference marker, consequently causing registration failures or errors in navigation. Osseous rigid fixation is usually achieved by minimally invasive Schanz screws or pins. The goal of this study was to evaluate a non invasive external fixation device, a headband so far used in cranial navigation, as an alternative invasive fixation technique to reference markers in the femur. A common navigation system with an adapted trauma software application was used to track the positions of the soft tissue-attached headband relative to an invasive reference marker on the femur during manipulations of the thigh. Relative translative and rotational movements of the headband were measured during defined movements of the hip and knee and manipulations of the headband itself. The results revealed high translative and rotational movements, up to 6 mm and 3 degrees , respectively, due to minor manipulations of the affected lower extremity. Noninvasive soft tissue fixation with a headband does not allow rigid fixation for accurate navigated registration or operative procedures at the femur. Necessary intraoperative movements or manipulations would cause substantial registration failures. Invasive fixation techniques with screws or pins are still the method of choice.

Alteration of the hip joint centre during acetabular reaming

Change of the hip joint centre location during preparation of the acetabular cavity for the acetabular component can affect the outcome of total hip arthroplasty. Deviations from the preoperative geometry can compromise an otherwise successful operation with regard to hip dislocations, leg length inequality and range of motion of the hip joint. Eighteen acetabula from pelvic specimens were measured before and after acetabular reaming to determine the change of hip centre location. Two different acetabular reamers were applied to the acetabular cavity: a chamfered reamer intended for minimal invasive hip surgery (MIS) and a conventional hemispherical reamer. An optical 3D scanning system created 3D models of the cavities prior to and after the reaming procedure. The two 3D models were merged into a single 3D model and displacements in all three dimensions were calculated The results showed no significant difference between MIS and conventional reaming with regard to transition vector length (p=0.9). The mean length of the transition vector was 3.6 mm (SD. 2.4 mm). Our findings suggest that the alteration of the hip centre location is not influenced by the changes made to the MIS reamers in comparison with conventional reamers. In comparison with previous studies the drift of the hip centre caused by the acetabular reaming is reduced due to new reaming techniques and prosthesis designs.

Präzision in der orthopädischen Computernavigation

Navigation has become increasingly integrated into orthopaedic surgery, especially in the area of endoprosthetic procedures. Simplification of the instrumentation along with the use of imageless systems has increased the ease of use for the orthopaedic surgeon. Principle navigation systems enable an accuracy of corrections and alignments within intervals of 1 mm or 1 degrees . Consequently, potential intra- and interobserver failures during the registration procedure typically range within a few millimetres or degrees. Analysis of the actual algorithms used for the registration process of the lower extremity mechanical axis and the articular surfaces reveal valid and reproducible results. With the help of navigation, it is possible to achieve a higher degree of precision in total hip and knee implant placement, including a distinct reduction in variance as compared to conventional techniques. Similarly, application of navigation during a high tibial osteotomy or at the osteotomy of the distal radius also enables a more precise correction of the axis of the affected extremity, in addition to improved reproducibility. Despite these promising early results, large prospective clinical studies comparing conventional techniques versus computer assisted navigation are thus far only available for total knee arthroplasty. Whether navigated prosthesis placement can truly extend the longevity of an implant will require continued observation in the years to come. In addition, further prospective studies are required to determine the benefit of navigation in other orthopaedic procedures.

Orientation of the acetabular component

We compared the orientation of the acetabular component obtained by a conventional manual technique with that using five different navigation systems.

Three surgeons carried out five implantations of an acetabular component with each navigation system, as well as manually, using an anatomical model. The orientation of the acetabular component, including inclination and anteversion, and its position was determined using a co-ordinate measuring machine.

The variation of the orientation of the acetabular component was higher in the conventional group compared with the navigated group. One experienced surgeon took significantly less time for the procedure. However, his placement of the component was no better than that of the less experienced surgeons. Significantly better inclination and anteversion (p < 0.001 for both) were obtained using navigation. These parameters were not significantly different between the surgeons when using the conventional technique (p = 0.966).

The use of computer navigation helps a surgeon to orientate the acetabular component with less variation regarding inclination and anteversion.

Misinterpretation of cup anteversion in total hip arthroplasty using planar radiography

INTRODUCTION

Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs are routinely used to monitor cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Analysis of planar radiographs leads to a certain degree of measurement error for the cup anteversion (AV). With the current study, we wanted to clarify whether planar radiography can be used for accurate evaluation of the THA position.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The postoperative orientation of pelvic implants in 42 patients was analyzed according to five documented mathematical algorithms using planar radiographs. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) pelvis scans were available for all patients. A CT-based navigation system was used to determine AV.

RESULTS

The comparison showed that all five formulas presented substantial variations for the AV angle. Of these, Widmer's algorithm presented the smallest difference compared to the CT. Misinterpretation of postoperative planar radiographs is a common problem in THA.

CONCLUSION

Planar radiographs are too imprecise for exact evaluation of the correct cup AV after THA. CT-based analysis may be necessary if exact values are required.

Positionnement de la cupule d’une prothèse totale de hanche par navigation sans image basée sur la cinématique articulaire

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

Most navigation systems for computer-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) require prior computed tomography (CT) or acquisition of multiple bone landmarks on the pelvis. In order to avoid these problems, we developed a computer-assisted navigation system without CT based on a kinematic approach to the hip joint. The principle is to orient the cup in relation to the cone describing the hip joint range of motion. The purpose of this work was to analyze preliminary results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighteen primary THA were implanted with the system (16 women, two men, mean age 68 +/- 7.8 years, age range 54-83 years, 18 degenerative hip disease). Two optoelectronic captors were fixed percutaneously on the pelvis and the distal femur. The acetabulum was prepared first followed by the femur using reamers and broaches of increasing size. The last broach placed in the femur was equipped with a large head adapted to the newly prepared acetabulum. The range of hip motion was recorded to determine the maximal range of motion cone. The acetabular cup was thus positioned in order the prosthesis range of motion included entirely the maximal range of motion of the hip joint.

RESULTS

One patient fell three weeks after implantation causing posterior dislocation; there was no recurrence. The Postel-Merle-d'Aubligné score improved from 8 +/- 2.9 (range 3-12) preoperatively to 17 +/- 0.8 (range 16-18) at last follow-up. None of the patients complained about the captor insertion and there were no cases of hematoma or fracture. Operative time was 35-40 minutes longer for the first four cases and was progressively reduced 15-20 minutes for the last four cases. Mean leg length discrepancy was 5.6 +/- 7.5 mm (range 0-25) before implantation and 0.6 +/- 3 mm (range -5 to 10 mm) at last follow-up. CT-scan measurements revealed a mean anteversion of the femoral implant of 18.2 +/- 8.5 degrees (range 0-31). Anatomic anteversion of the cup (measured from the pelvis landmark and thus independently of the position of the pelvis) was 24.7 +/- 8.8 degrees (range 12-40). The sum of the femoral and anatomic acetabular anteversions was 43 +/- 13.1 degrees (range 22-71). Anteversions were 16 degrees for the cup and 16 degrees for the stem for the one case of dislocation.

CONCLUSION

This method can be used in routine without lengthening operative time significantly. It safely controls leg length and helps position the cup. This study demonstrated that there is no ideal position for the cup which can be used for all patients. Because of the wide range of inclination and anteversion figures, half of the cases were outside the safety zone recommended by Lewinnek.

Self-calibrating 3D-ultrasound-based bone registration for minimally invasive orthopedic surgery

Intraoperative freehand three-dimensional (3-D) ultrasound (3D-US) has been proposed as a noninvasive method for registering bones to a preoperative computed tomography image or computer-generated bone model during computer-aided orthopedic surgery (CAOS). In this technique, an US probe is tracked by a 3-D position sensor and acts as a percutaneous device for localizing the bone surface. However, variations in the acoustic properties of soft tissue, such as the average speed of sound, can introduce significant errors in the bone depth estimated from US images, which limits registration accuracy. We describe a new self-calibrating approach to US-based bone registration that addresses this problem, and demonstrate its application within a standard registration scheme. Using realistic US image data acquired from 6 femurs and 3 pelves of intact human cadavers, and accurate Gold Standard registration transformations calculated using bone-implanted fiducial markers, we show that self-calibrating registration is significantly more accurate than a standard method, yielding an average root mean squared target registration error of 1.6 mm. We conclude that self-calibrating registration results in significant improvements in registration accuracy for CAOS applications over conventional approaches where calibration parameters of the 3D-US system remain fixed to values determined using a preoperative phantom-based calibration.

The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements

Reduction of the range of motion (ROM) until prosthetic impingement of a total hip replacement may lead to frequent impingement, subluxation and dislocation especially for patients with good hip movement. The ROM until prosthetic impingement can be calculated using the technical ROM (theta) and the cup and neck positions by a previously created mathematical formula. A larger (theta) with proper cup and neck positions results in a larger ROM. However there was only one paper written in English, which revealed the optimum theoretical combination of cup and neck anteversions. ROM of more than 110 degrees flexion, 30 degrees internal-rotation at 90 degrees flexion, 30 degrees extension and 40 degrees external-rotation were defined as the criteria for essential ROM for ADL. The safe-zones for combined cup anteversion (betaanat) and neck anteversion (b) were defined as the areas that fulfill all the criteria of ROM without prosthetic impingement. The safe-zones were created for 35 degrees , 45 degrees and 55 degrees cup abductions (alpha) and for 120 degrees and 135 degrees (theta). The safe-zones for combined (betaanat) and (b) were much larger for a 135 degrees (theta) than a 120 degrees (theta). Their safe-zones showed that (b) should be reduced if (betaanat) is increased and choosing a lower (alpha) requires that the sum of (betaanat) and (b) should be higher and vice versa. A (theta) of more than 135 degrees is recommended as it further increases the size of the safe-zone and provides a larger ROM, and the optimum values of combined cup and neck anteversions can be estimated by the formula: (alpha) + (betaanat) + 0.77(b) = 84.3.

Two-incision total hip replacement: Intra-operative fluoroscopy versus imageless navigation for cup placement

The purpose of this study was to describe the surgical technique and to investigate results of a modified two-incision total hip replacement using either intraoperative fluoroscopy or imageless navigation. Twenty-nine patients (30 hips) with a minimum follow-up of one year were enrolled in this study. The patients were evaluated at 3, 6, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 1-year. The functional recovery as represented by the Harris hip score and WOMAC scale were better in the fluoroscopy group of patients at the early postoperative stage (3 wks). Thereafter, both groups showed rapid recovery with no difference in scores. Injury to the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve was the most commonly seen complication and it occurred in 6 hips (fluoroscopy 2; imageless 4). The symptoms were transient and resolved in 6 months in all 6 cases. This study demonstrated that the role of intraoperative fluoroscopy could safely be replaced by an imageless navigation system for the MIS-2 THA.

Pfannenposition und Orientierung im Vergleich

BACKGROUND

Aim of this in-vitro study was to compare the hip cup placement for total hip replacement when using different navigation systems compared with the traditional, non-navigated technique.

METHODS

Five different navigation systems were used: the CT-less systems Navitrack, Orthopilot and Surgetics Station, as well as the CT-based Navitrack and VectorVision. Three different surgeons carried out five cup implantations using all navigation systems and the manual approach on a surgery dummy. Cup orientation (inclination and anteversion) and the cup position (achieved cup center) were determined with a coordinate measuring machine.

RESULTS

In the manual group the variability of the cup orientation was higher in comparison and hardly influenced by the surgeon. Navigation was identified as a significant factor for smaller deviations from planned inclination and anteversion angles (p<0,001 for both). Cup position was not affected by surgeon in the manual group (p=0,966). Compared with manual technique, the cup misplacement vector was significantly smaller in the CT-Navitrack group (p<0,001) but higher in the Navitrack (CT-less) and VectorVision group (p<0,001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of computer navigation will help the surgeon to orientate the acetabular component more accurately but not necessarily with regard to cup positioning.

The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Biomechanical analysis and clinical experience reveal that offset total hip stems increase soft tissue tension and reduce the risk for dislocation in total hip arthroplasty. Most of these stems have a smaller neck-shaft-angle to increase the offset. This study investigates if changing the neck-shaft-angle has an impact on how cup and stem should be positioned with regard to range of motion.

METHODS

A mathematical model of a total hip arthroplasty was developed to analyze range of motion until impingement between cup and neck. Range of motion was determined for each combination of neck-shaft-angles and additional parameters like cup inclination, cup anteversion, stem antetorsion, head/neck ratio and design of the cup opening.

RESULTS

A maximized range of motion is achieved for neck-shaft-angles between 125 degrees and 131 degrees . Reducing the neck-shaft-angle by one degree requires reducing the cup anteversion by about 2 degrees and increasing the cup inclination by 0.45 degrees . Stems with neck-shaft-angles more than 135 degrees are not recommended when the head/neck ratio is 2.3 or less.

INTERPRETATION

Stems with a reduced neck-shaft-angle for an increased offset should be coupled with cups that are inclined slightly higher and less anteverted as compared to a standard stem. Precise recommendations for optimal component positioning can only be given for a specific prosthesis system regarding all parameters.

New technology in cemented total hip arthroplasty

The long-term results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) are predicated by excellent surgical techniques. New technology offers the hope of improving outcomes by providing to surgeons tools that make surgical procedures predictable. Techniques that improve the bone-cement-prosthesis composite should enhance long-term fixation. Less invasive surgical techniques that allow rapid recovery from THA have been recently described. Image-guided surgery may enable surgeons to accurately reconstruct the arthritic hip and improve outcomes.