Cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cancer: a combined analysis

Combined nephrectomy and major hepatectomy: indications, outcomes, and recommendations

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous nephrectomy with major hepatectomy (NMH) is uncommon. We reviewed our experience with NMH.

STUDY DESIGN

Records of patients who underwent NMH at Emory Hospital between January 1995 and May 2008 were examined. Patients undergoing resection of three or more liver segments at the same setting as a total nephrectomy were included. Indications and outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty patients underwent NMH. Mean (+/- SD) age was 59.9+/-12.8 years, 6 (30%) were women, and 15 (75%) presented with comorbidities. Most kidney neoplasms were renal cell carcinomas of the right kidney (n=16, 80%) with a mean diameter of 10.0+/-6.1 cm. Eight patients (40%) also underwent thrombectomy for inferior vena cava tumor thrombus. The most common indications for hepatectomy were direct liver invasion in eight patients (40%) and distant hepatic metastases in nine (45%); liver tumors were 4.2+/-3.3 cm (mean +/- SD) in diameter. Mean (+/- SD) operative time was 8.3+/-2.6 hours. Liver resections included 15 (75%) right hepatectomies and 5 (25%) left hepatectomies. In all cases, tumor negative hepatic margins were achieved. Median operative blood loss was 1,700 mL (range 200 to 8,000 mL). Ten patients (50%) suffered complications in the postoperative period; three of these suffered major complications, resulting in one perioperative death (5%). Mean hospital stay was 12+/-8.8 days. Overall survival was 25 months (range 0 to 34 months).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large series of nephrectomy with simultaneous major hepatectomy, morbidity and mortality were acceptable. In specialized centers NMH may be considered in properly selected patients for combined resection for synchronous neoplasms of the kidney and liver.

Is age a prognostic factor for treatment outcome in renal cell cancer-A comprehensive review

Life expectancy gradually increases in the Western part of the world. Older patients may present with small, localized tumours and/or advanced or metastatic disease and still, potentially, have a considerable life expectancy. The consequence of the increased life span is that in older patients all potential treatments have to be discussed. A critical review of the literature regarding the treatment of different stages of renal cell cancer (RCC) in the elderly patient group was conducted. Elderly people with small renal masses are up to 3.5 times more likely to have a benign lesion. The oncological outcome from nephron sparing surgery (NSS), whether by means of laparoscopy or by means of open surgery, seems not to be different between young and old patients. No relationship between local recurrence and metastatic progression rates and patient age has been demonstrated. The outcome from systemic treatments in advanced/metastatic disease has been studied, no differences were observed between age groups, although toxicity profiles might differ between the younger and older patient groups.

Renal cell carcinoma

Considerable progress has been made in the treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma, with innovative surgical and systemic strategies revolutionising the management of this disease. In localised disease, partial nephrectomy for small tumours and radical nephrectomy for large tumours continue to be the gold-standard treatments, with emphasis on approaches that have reduced invasiveness and preserve renal function. Additionally, cytoreductive nephrectomy is often indicated before the start of systemic treatment in patients with metastatic disease as part of integrated management strategy. The effectiveness of immunotherapy, although previously widely used for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma, is still controversial, and is mainly reserved for patients with good prognostic factors. Development of treatments that have specific targets in relevant biological pathways has been the main advance in treatment. Targeted drugs, including inhibitors of the vascular endothelial growth factor and mammalian target of rapamycin pathways, have shown robust effectiveness and offer new therapeutic options for the patients with metastatic disease.

Neoadjuvant sunitinib for surgically complex advanced renal cell cancer of doubtful resectability: initial experience with downsizing to reconsider cytoreductive surgery

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate neoadjuvant sunitinib in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) to downsize surgically complex tumours and reconsider cytoreductive surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of ten consecutive mRCC patients treated with sunitinib in an expanded access program who presented with surgically complex primary tumours or bulky locoregional metastases. Surgery-limiting tumour sites (SLTSs) were defined as primary or retroperitoneal lesions with direct invasion of adjacent organs or encasement of vital structures on imaging. Patients received sunitinib 50 mg/day for 4 weeks on and 2 weeks off to be followed by cytoreductive surgery after downsizing and individual reassessment. Response was measured according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST).

RESULTS

Six out of ten SLTSs revealed a reduction of tumour size with a median of 14% according to RECIST. None of the ten SLTSs had a partial response (PR), whilst at distant metastatic sites one complete remission and two PRs occurred. Downsizing of SLTSs appeared most prominent in the first 2-4 months, which resulted in reconsidering cytoreductive nephrectomy in three patients. These three tumours invaded the liver on imaging and were reduced by 11, 18 and 20%.

CONCLUSIONS

In this patient group with mRCC and surgically complex primary tumours or locoregional metastases, downsizing of SLTSs by neoadjuvant sunitinib was limited. Cytoreductive surgery was reconsidered in three patients. Given the overall reduction in tumour burden by sunitinib alone, further investigation to define the role of cytoreductive surgery is warranted.

Response of the primary tumor to neoadjuvant sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

We assessed the activity of neoadjuvant sunitinib on primary renal tumors in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma as well as the feasibility and safety of subsequent surgical resection.

METHODS

A total of 19 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma deemed unsuitable for initial nephrectomy due to locally advanced disease or extensive metastatic burden were treated with 50 mg sunitinib daily for 4 weeks on followed by 2 weeks off. Tumor response was assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors every 2 cycles and the rate of conversion to resectable status was estimated.

RESULTS

Median patient age was 64 years and initial median radiographic renal tumor size was 10.5 cm. Clinical stage was N+ (10) and M+ (15). No patients experienced a complete response. Partial responses of the primary tumor were noted in 3 patients (16%), 7 (37%) had stable disease and 9 (47%) had disease progression in the primary tumor. Overall tumor response included 2 patients (11%) with partial response, 7 (37%) with stable disease and 10 (53%) with disease progression. At a median followup of 6 months (range 1 to 15) 4 patients (21%) had undergone nephrectomy and 5 died of disease progression. No unexpected surgical morbidity was encountered. Viable tumor was present in all 4 specimens. Sunitinib was associated with grade 3-4 toxicity in 7 patients (37%) and treatment was discontinued in 1 due to toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma with the primary tumor in place is feasible and can lead to a reduction in tumor burden that can facilitate subsequent surgical resection.

Pre-surgical targeted molecular therapy in renal cell carcinoma

Pre-surgical systemic therapy with targeted molecular agents is an attractive option as an approach to the treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma. This treatment strategy offers a rational approach for selecting patients with metastatic disease who are most likely to benefit from cytoreductive nephrectomy, but also allows access to treated tumour tissue to study the molecular mechanisms of response and resistance. In patients with locally advanced disease, this strategy offers the potential for improved resectability and timely delivery of systemic therapy to treat subclinical metastatic disease. Preliminary evidence indicates that the use of targeted therapies before nephrectomy is safe. Reliable therapy-specific prognostic biomarkers are needed for the optimal integration of aggressive surgical intervention and systemic therapy to maximize the oncological benefits for the patient.

Cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cytoreductive nephrectomy has an established role in management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma when performed in properly selected patients prior to administration of systemic cytokine therapy. Within the past several years, novel molecular targeted agents have not only revolutionized management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma but also created controversy regarding the necessity, patient selection for and timing of cytoreductive nephrectomy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Benefits of targeted molecular therapeutics have largely been observed in the context of prior cytoreductive nephrectomy, and limited available evidence supports cytoreductive nephrectomy in appropriately selected patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who are candidates for targeted systemic therapy. Presurgical systemic therapy with targeted molecular agents is an attractive paradigm, which not only offers a rational approach to select patients who are most likely to benefit from cytoreductive nephrectomy but also allows access to treated tumor tissue to study molecular mechanisms of response and resistance. Surgical approaches increasingly utilized in patients with localized kidney cancer, such as nephron-sparing and minimally invasive techniques are similarly relevant and should be utilized, when appropriate, in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

SUMMARY

Cytoreductive nephrectomy should be considered to provide a survival benefit for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and should be used in patients who are candidates for systemic therapy before or after surgery.

Cytoreductive partial nephrectomy does not undermine cancer control in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a population-based study

OBJECTIVES

We examined the population-based rates of cancer-specific survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (MRCC) treated with either partial (PN) or radical cytoreductive nephrectomy (RN).

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with MRCC and treated with either PN or RN were identified within nine SEER cancer registries. Matched and unmatched Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, as well as multivariable Cox regression models compared the effect of RN (n = 1997, 97.8%) vs. PN (n = 46, 2.2%) on cancer-specific survival (CSS). Covariates consisted of age, gender, community type (rural vs urban), race, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry, tumor size and year of diagnosis.

RESULTS

In multivariable unmatched Cox regression analyses, no statistically significantly difference was found in CSS between the two groups (hazard ratio [HR] 1.40, P = .16). Similarly, no difference in CSS was found in the matched analyses (HR 1.35, log rank P = .34).

CONCLUSION

Cytoreductive PN does not appear to undermine survival in patients with MRCC.

Interferon-alpha in combination with either imatinib (Gleevec) or gefitinib (Iressa) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a phase II trial

Treatments for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (MRCC) are limited. RCCs frequently overexpress epithelial growth factor receptor and express c-Kit and platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta. Combination of interferon with tyrosine kinase inhibitors of epithelial growth factor receptor [gefitinib (Iressa)] or c-Kit and platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta [imatinib (Gleevec)] was evaluated for efficacy and safety. Patients with MRCC received 12-week cycles of interferon [3 million units (MU) subcutaneously thrice in week 1 and 6 MU thrice weekly thereafter] and either gefitinib (500 mg daily) or imatinib (600 mg daily). The gefitinib/imatinib dose was reduced as needed owing to toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective tumor response. Secondary endpoints were time to tumor progression, overall survival, and safety. Seventeen patients were enrolled. Most had clear cell [36% (6/17)] or papillary [36% (6/17)] tumors. Most (n=14) were treated on the gefitinib arm, including two patients who crossed over from the imatinib arm after experiencing disease progression. Objective tumor responses were evaluable in 14 patients (82%). Of these 14, partial responses occurred in three (21%), stable disease in seven (50%), and progressive disease in four (29%). The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were skin rash, flu-like symptoms, and fatigue (both treatment arms); diarrhea (gefitinib arm only); and thrombocytopenia and leukopenia (imatinib arm only). Median time to tumor progression (range) for patients on the gefitinib arm only was 4.27 (1.13-15.97) months and median overall survival (range) was 11.42+ (1.13-29.07+) months. Combination of gefitinib with interferon safely delays progression of refractory MRCC. Further studies in this setting are warranted.

Advanced-stage renal cell carcinoma treated by radical nephrectomy and adjacent organ or structure resection

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of radical nephrectomy (RN) with adjacent organ and structure resection on survival, as invasion of adjacent organs in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is rare.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After institutional review board approval, we reviewed our database and statistically analysed of patients with pathological stage T3 or T4 RCC who had RN and resection of a contiguous organ or structure.

RESULTS

We identified 38 patients of 2464 (1.5%) who had RN with adjacent organ or structure resection. The median (interquartile range) size of the mass was 11 (8-14) cm, and the follow-up 13 (5-33) months. Most patients (68%) were pT4 stage and had conventional clear cell carcinoma (95%). Fourteen patients (37%) had positive surgical margins. The liver (10) was the most commonly resected adjacent organ or structure. Only one patient remains alive with no evidence of disease at 5 years, while three are currently alive with disease. Overall, 34 of 38 patients (90%) ultimately died from disease at a median (range) of 11.7 (5.4-29.2) months after surgical resection. The surgical margin status was the only statistically significant factor for recurrence and death (P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis for patients with advanced RCC and adjacent organ or structure involvement is extremely poor and similar to that of patients with metastatic disease. These patients should be thoroughly counselled about the impact of surgical management and considered for entry into neoadjuvant or adjuvant clinical trials with new targeted systemic agents.

Renal adenocarcinoma presenting as a groin swelling: a case report

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is known to have myriad presentations due to the extremely vascular nature of the organ. RCC are known to metastasize extensively to various organs of the body. We report a case of a 70-years-old male who presented with multiple inguinal lymph node enlargements which on excision biopsy showed metastatic adenocarcinomatous deposit. Search for the primary revealed a RCC arising from the left kidney. Inguinal lymph nodal metastasis, an uncommon site of distant metastasis in renal neoplasm, as a fi rst clinical sign leading to the diagnosis is not yet reported in literature.

Renal cell cancer stage migration: analysis of the National Cancer Data Base

BACKGROUND

Evidence exists to suggest a pattern of increasing early diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The aim of the study was to analyze patterns of disease presentation and outcome of RCC by AJCC stage using data from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) over a 12-year period.

METHODS

The NCDB was queried for adults diagnosed between 1993 and 2004 presenting with ICD-O-2 of 3 renal cell tumors arising in the kidney. Cases were classified by demographics, 2002 AJCC stage (6th edition), and histology. The Cochran-Armitage Test for Trend was used to determine statistical significance of trends over time. Cox regression multivariate analysis was used to evaluate the impact of stage and histology on relative survival. SPSS 14.0 was used for analyses.

RESULTS

Between 1993 and 2004 a total of 205,963 patients from the NCDB fit our case definition of RCC. Comparisons between 1993 and 2004 data show an increase in stage I disease and decrease in stage II, III, and IV disease (P < or = .001). The size of stage I tumors also decreased from a mean of 4.1 cm in 1993 to 3.6 cm in 2003. In multivariate analysis, stage, but not histology, predicted relative survival. A 3.3% increase in survival was found for patients diagnosed in 1998 compared with patients diagnosed in 1993.

CONCLUSIONS

A greater proportion of newly diagnosed patients with RCC currently present with stage I disease compared with earlier years. Stage predicts relative survival for patients with kidney cancer. More recently diagnosed patients have improved relative survival.

No improvement in renal cell carcinoma survival: a population-based study in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND

The increased finding of kidney 'incidentalomas' and more frequent surgery in patients with renal cell cancer (RCC) metastases may have improved survival from the disease. However, recent data on survival of unselected population-based series of patients with RCC are sparse.

METHODS

We collected the follow-up data for all the patients registered with RCC in the population-based cancer registry held by the Comprehensive Cancer Centre East, the Netherlands.

RESULTS

Patients (1504) diagnosed with RCC between 1989 and 2002 were included. Eighty-three percent of all tumours were histologically confirmed; 17% of all diagnoses were based on clinical examination only. The latter group was older, had a worse stage distribution, often did not receive any kind of therapy and showed a 5-year relative survival of 8%. Five-year relative survival for patients with a histologically confirmed RCC was 60% and did not improve over the last 15 years. A low resection rate in patients with metastasis was observed, most pronounced in elderly, without a tendency of increase in more recent years.

CONCLUSION

The relative survival of RCC did not improve over the years. The resection rate in patients with metastasised disease did not increase over time, despite current knowledge concerning its benefit on tumour complications, time to progression and response to immunotherapy.

Sunitinib for treatment of advanced renal cell cancer: primary tumor response

PURPOSE

Nephrectomy before immunotherapy in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (RCC) will improve patient outcome. In addition, the primary tumor is known to be refractory to cytokines. Sunitinib is now approved for treatment of advanced RCC, but its effect on the primary tumor has yet to be reported.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

All patients treated with sunitinib for advanced RCC without prior nephrectomy were reviewed and sequential computed tomography scans were evaluated for response in the primary tumor as well as metastases according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Volumes of primary tumors and central necrotic areas were measured with the perimeter method.

RESULTS

Computed tomography scans were available for evaluation of response in 17 of 22 patients with a primary tumor in situ (1 patient with two primaries). According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, 4 patients had a partial response, 12 had stable disease, and 1 had progressive disease. The one-dimensional longest diameter of the primary tumor correlated with the volumetric measurements both at baseline and at the time of evaluation of response. Excluding the patient with progressive disease, the median volume reduction was 31% associated with a median increase in the volume of necrosis of 39%. Three patients underwent nephrectomy and tumors showed extensive necrotic areas next to small fields of vital tumor cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Sunitinib can induce a significant reduction in volume of primary renal cell tumors. Further trials need to address the role of nephrectomy in advanced RCC patients on sunitinib treatment.

Current status of debulking nephrectomy in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) has an established role against metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in properly selected patients and offers a survival advantage when performed prior to cytokine therapy. With the emergence of new, effective targeted molecular therapies for mRCC, well-designed prospective trials are needed to clarify the biologic effects of CN to determine when and for whom CN should be performed in the context of targeted systemic therapy. Consequently, a thorough characterization of the systemic effects afforded by CN is imperative for developing individualized treatment strategies that effectively address the underlying biology of mRCC while maximizing patient quality of life during therapy. Until then, debulking surgery, which provides a survival benefit for select patients with mRCC, should continue to be used in patients before or after targeted systemic therapy.

Phase II trial of B7-1 (CD-86) transduced, cultured autologous tumor cell vaccine plus subcutaneous interleukin-2 for treatment of stage IV renal cell carcinoma

We report a single center phase II trial of sequential vaccination followed with vaccine plus interleukin-2 (IL-2). Vaccination consisted of autologous cells cultured from primary tumor or resected metastasis, transduced to express B7.1 surface molecule and then irradiated. The vaccine would hypothetically costimulate tumor-reactive T cells before IL-2 exposure. Treatment plan was 3 subcutaneous vaccine injections at 4-week intervals and subcutaneous IL-2 treatment for 6 weeks starting at week 7. Sixty-six patients enrolled, of whom 39 received at least 1 vaccine; most observed toxicity was attributable to IL-2 not vaccine; best responses were 3% pathologic complete response, 5% partial response, 64% stable disease, and 28% disease progression. Median survival was 21.8 months (95% confidence interval 17.8 to 29.6). Significant postvaccination increases in IFN-gamma responses to autologous tumor were observed in 2/26 cases. Eighty-one percent of posttreatment subdermal delayed-type hypersensitivity tests (using nontransduced, irradiated autologous tumor cells) had biopsies demonstrating injection site lymphocytic infiltration. Post hoc comparison of the median survival of subjects whose biopsies had lymphocytic infiltration appears longer than in the 19% noninfiltrated (28.4 vs. 17.8 mo, P=0.045, two-sided log-rank test). The single arm design precludes conclusive comparison of objective response rates (not different here) or median survival (longer here) versus those of historical series using similar IL-2 schedules alone. Better outcomes could be logically associated to vaccine response (detectable lymphocytic infiltrates) or to random events that a single arm study design cannot address. This vaccine approach may merit further clinical development.

Renal cell carcinoma: new developments in molecular biology and potential for targeted therapies

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) affects 38,000 individuals in the U.S. yearly. Seventy-five percent of cases are clear-cell carcinomas, and a majority is driven by dysfunction of the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) gene. VHL loss of function and other non-VHL pathways leading to RCC share aberrant activation of the hypoxic response, such as upregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and consequent neoangiogenesis. Metastatic RCC has been notoriously resistant to therapy. For decades, its treatment has been based on nephrectomy and limited use of toxic and often inefficient immunotherapy with interleukin-2 or interferon-alpha. However, new biologic agents are beginning to break the resistance barrier. Small-molecule multikinase inhibitors that target VEGF receptors (sunitinib and sorafenib) have a favorable toxicity profile and can prolong time to progression and preserve quality of life when used in newly diagnosed or previously treated patients. The anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab enhances the response rate and prolongs disease control when added to interferon-alpha. Temsirolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, prolongs the survival duration of patients with poor-risk disease. Despite three new drugs being approved for RCC in the past 2 years, responses are mostly partial and of limited duration. Multiple new drugs and drug combinations are undergoing clinical trials and will likely impact the treatment of RCC in future years. Compounds found to be active in the metastatic setting are now being tried in earlier stage disease in an attempt to improve curability. However, no method has yet been validated to predict patient response to these newer treatments.

Changing concepts in the surgery of renal cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Herein, current developments in open and minimally invasive renal surgery are presented.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This also includes considerations on the appropriate indication for the two surgical procedures in small renal tumours, locally advanced disease (>pT2), complicated renal tumours as well as cytoreductive surgical situations. In small renal tumours, similar survival rates have been described for laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy. However, even experienced high volume laparoscopic centres report a high learning curve, increased complications and initial technical problems to achieve parenchymal haemostasis and renal ischaemia during nephron-sparing surgery. Surgical management of large (>T2) or complicated tumours is feasible, but long-term oncological outcome is not yet available.

CONCLUSION

Promising new developments such as natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) might add to our surgical armamentarium for minimally invasive surgery.

Surgical management of large renal tumors

In addition to an increased occurrence of small, localized, incidentally discovered renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), there has been an upward trend in the incidence of advanced renal tumors per unit of population and in disease mortality worldwide. As radical nephrectomy remains the standard of care in treating localized RCC, this manuscript focuses on surgical approaches. We defined 'large renal tumors' as those greater than 7 cm or those with venous involvement. We discuss operative strategies in both open and laparoscopic surgery as well as approaches to special circumstances, including patients with tumor thrombus and the indications for nephron-sparing surgery in patients with greater than T2 RCC. The literature pertaining to controversial areas such as preoperative renal artery embolization and the clinical utility of metastectomy and cytoreductive therapy are also reviewed. The theoretical basis and potential applications of neoadjuvant therapy for larger renal tumors is examined as well.

Renal cancer

In Europe, renal cancer (that is neoplasia of the kidney, renal pelvis or ureter (ICD-9 189 and ICD-10 C64-C66)) ranks as the seventh most common malignancy in men amongst whom there are 29,600 new cases each year (3.5% of all cancers). Tobacco, obesity and a diet poor in vegetables are all acknowledged risk factors, along with specific occupational and environmental factors. A familial history of renal carcinoma is also likely to increase the risk. Renal carcinoma may remain clinically occult for most of its course. The classic presentation of pain, haematuria, and flank mass occurs in only 9% of patients and is often indicative of advanced disease. Approximately 30% of patients with renal carcinoma present with metastatic disease, 25% with locally advanced renal carcinoma and 45% with localized disease. Metastases are typically found in the lung, soft tissue, bone, liver, cutaneous sites, and central nervous system. The most important staging technique is a computed tomography (CT) scan of the whole abdomen. Survival rates are more favourable for patients with tumours confined to the kidney. Five-year survival for patients with metastatic renal carcinoma is comprised between 0 and 20%. Radical nephrectomy is the standard intervention for renal cancer. Intrinsic resistance to chemotherapy has long been a hallmark of renal carcinoma. Limited options are available for the systemic therapy, and no chemotherapeutic regimen is accepted as a standard of care. Biologic agents represent the major effective therapies for widespread metastatic renal cancer. An antiangiogenic strategy, the neutralization of VEGF, can slow the growth rate of advanced cancer.

Outcome after cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma is predicted by fractional percentage of tumour volume removed

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the fractional percentage of tumour volume (FPTV) removed at cytoreductive nephrectomy predicts disease-specific survival (DSS), as metastatic renal cell carcinoma ((M+)RCC) is associated with poor overall survival with only a 10-20% patient survival at 2 years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Columbia Urologic Oncology Database was reviewed; 1016 patients had renal surgery from 1988 to 2005, 78 patients with (M+)RCC underwent nephrectomy. The FPTV removed was determined using pathological and imaging reports. The patients were stratified as having a > or <90% FPTV. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test was used to determine survival advantage between groups. A Cox proportional hazard model was used for FPTV in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Secondary analyses were conducted to determine if the size of the primary tumour or volume of metastases affected outcome and if the FPTV affected hospitalization time.

RESULTS

In all, 55 patients had their FPTV calculated exactly; 45 had a >90% FPTV. The median DSS times were 11.6 and 2.9 months for patients with >90% and <90% FPTV removed (P = 0.002). The hazard ratio for death was 0.24 for patients with a >90% FPTV in a univariate model (P = 0.016) and 0.29 in multivariate analysis (P = 0.02). Patients with a <90% FPTV spent a greater percentage of time hospitalized before death, 21.2% vs 6.5% (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

For patients with (M+)RCC, overall survival is limited, but can be extended by cytoreductive nephrectomy. The FPTV expected to be removed is a simple and available method to counsel patients regarding the benefits of surgical intervention.

Cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma with nonclear cell histology

PURPOSE

To our knowledge the benefit of cytoreductive surgery for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma with nonclear cell histology is unknown. In this retrospective study we report our experience with cytoreductive nephrectomy for nonclear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. We compared the outcomes with those in patients with clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1991 to 2006, 606 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma underwent cytoreductive nephrectomy and they formed the basis of this report. Of these patients 92 had nonclear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The remaining 514 patients had clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma and they formed a comparative group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between clinical variables and histology (clear cell vs nonclear cell) on disease specific survival.

RESULTS

Compared with patients with clear cell histology those with nonclear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma were younger (p = 0.0001), and more likely to have nodal metastases (p <0.0001) and sarcomatoid features (23% vs 13%, p = 0.026). On multivariate analysis median disease specific survival in patients with nonclear cell histology was significantly worse than that in patients with clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma (9.7 vs 20.3 months, p = 0.0003) even after adjusting for T stage, grade, performance status, age and sarcomatoid features. Sarcomatoid features were a predictor of poor outcome in cases of clear and nonclear cell histology, although even in the absence of sarcomatoid features nonclear cell histology was associated with worse disease specific survival (p = 0.017). Interestingly although there was a significantly higher incidence of positive nodes in patients with nonclear histology (p <0.0001), this phenotype was not associated with a worse disease specific survival, as it was in those with clear cell histology (p = 0.0001). In fact, patients with node negative disease with nonclear cell histology had the worst prognosis overall in the entire group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with nonclear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma were younger and had a higher incidence of nodal metastases, a higher incidence of sarcomatoid features and a worse prognosis than those with clear cell histology who underwent cytoreductive surgery.

Results of Inferior Vena Caval Interruption by Greenfield Filter, Ligation or Resection During Radical Nephrectomy and Tumor Thrombectomy

PURPOSE

Surgical resection for patients with renal cell carcinoma and venous tumor thrombus may require interruption of the inferior vena cava using a Greenfield filter, ligation or resection. We describe the indications, technique, complications and outcomes of vena caval interruption during nephrectomy with tumor thrombectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified 160 patients treated for level II-IV tumor thrombus at our institution between 1970 and 2004. Operative reports were reviewed to establish vena caval interruption. All patients who underwent interruption were assessed for postoperative disability according to the American Venous Forum International Consensus Committee.

RESULTS

Vena caval interruption was performed in 40 of 160 cases (25%), including 14 level II, 10 level III and 16 level IV thrombi. A total of 34 patients (85%) were symptomatic at presentation. A Greenfield filter was deployed before cavotomy closure in 4 of 160 patients (2.5%) for bland thrombus of the infrarenal vena cava. Vena caval ligation was used for bland thrombus that completely occluded the infrarenal vena cava in 23 of 160 patients (14.4%), while segmental vena caval resection was performed for tumor thrombus growing into the wall of the vena cava or for tumor thrombus that interfaced with bland thrombus in 13 of 160 (8.1%). Postoperatively no case was class 3 disability, 12 of 40 (30%) were class 2, 12 of 40 (30%) were class 1 and 16 of 40 (40%) showed no disability.

CONCLUSIONS

The need to interrupt the inferior vena cava is not infrequent in patients undergoing radical nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy, and it may be well tolerated postoperatively. Management should be based on the degree of venous occlusion and the presence of bland thrombus.