Effects of antipsychotics, antidepressants and mood stabilizers on risk for physical diseases in people with schizophrenia, depression and bipolar disorder

Diabetes and Schizophrenia

People with schizophrenia have 2- to 5-fold higher risk of type 2 diabetes than the general population. The traditional risk factors for type 2 diabetes, especially obesity, poor diet, and sedentary lifestyle, are common in people with schizophrenia already early in the course of illness. People with schizophrenia also often have low socioeconomic status and income, which affects their possibilities to make healthy lifestyle choices. Antipsychotic medications increase the risk of type 2 diabetes both directly by affecting insulin sensitivity and indirectly by causing weight gain. Lifestyle modification interventions for prevention of diabetes should be an integral part of treatment of patients with schizophrenia. In the treatment of type 2 diabetes in patients with schizophrenia, communication and collaboration between medical care and psychiatric treatment providers are essential.

Prevalence and clinical features associated with bipolar disorder polypharmacy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Uncertainty exists regarding the prevalence and clinical features associated with the practice of polypharmacy in bipolar disorder (BD), warranting a systematic review on the matter.

METHODS

Three authors independently searched major electronic databases from inception till September 2015. Articles were included that reported either qualitative or quantitative data about the prevalence and clinical features associated with polypharmacy in adult cases of BD.

RESULTS

The operative definitions of polypharmacy adopted across varying studies varied, with concomitant use of two or more psychotropic medications or use of four or more psychotropic medications at once being the most common and the most reliable, respectively. Regardless of type or current mood episode polarity of BD, prevalence rates up to 85% and 36% were found using the most permissive (two or more medications at once) and the most conservative (four or more) operative definitions for polypharmacy, respectively. Point prevalence prescription rates of one or more antidepressant or antipsychotic as part of a polypharmacy regimen occurred in up to 45% or 80% of the cases, respectively, according to the most permissive definition of polypharmacy. In contrast, lithium prescription rates ranged from 13% to 33% in BD patients receiving polypharmacy according to conservative and permissive definitions, possibly suggesting a reduced need for augmentation of combination strategies for those cases of BD with a favorable lifetime lithium response and/or long-lasting treatment as well as less likelihood of lithium response over the time most severe cases possibly exposed to a more complex polypharmacy overall.

LIMITATIONS

"Apples and oranges" bias; publication bias for most recently introduced compounds.

CONCLUSION

Polypharmacy is common among people with BD across varying type and mood episode phases of illness. Special population, including BD patients at high risk of familial load for suicidal behavior, solicit further research as well as the plausible "protective" role of lithium toward polypharmacy in BD. The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42014015084.

Relationship between prolactin, breast cancer risk, and antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia: a critical review

OBJECTIVE

A recent meta-analysis showed that breast cancer probably is more common in female patients with schizophrenia than in the general population (effect size = 1.25, P < 0.05). Increasing experimental and epidemiological data have alerted researchers to the influence of prolactin (PRL) in mammary carcinogenesis. We therefore investigated the possible relationship between antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia (HPRL) and breast cancer risk in female patients with schizophrenia.

METHOD

A literature search (1950 until January 2015), using the MEDLINE database, was conducted for English-language published clinical trials to identify and synthesize data of the current state of knowledge concerning breast cancer risk (factors) in women with schizophrenia and its (their) relationship between HPRL and antipsychotic medication.

RESULTS

Although an increasing body of evidence supports the involvement of PRL in breast carcinogenesis, results of human prospective studies are limited, equivocal, and correlative (with risk ratios ranging from 0.70 to 1.9 for premenopausal women and from 0.76 to 2.03 for postmenopausal women). Moreover, these studies equally do not take into account the local production of PRL in breast epithelium, although amplification or overexpression of the local autocrine/paracrine PRL loop may be a more important mechanism in tumorigenesis. Until now, there is also no conclusive evidence that antipsychotic medication can increase the risk of breast malignancy and mortality.

CONCLUSION

Other breast risk factors than PRL, such as nulliparity, obesity, diabetes mellitus, and unhealthy lifestyle behaviours (alcohol dependence, smoking, low physical activity), probably are of greater relevance in individual breast cancer cases within the population of female patients with schizophrenia.

Are leptin levels increased among people with schizophrenia versus controls? A systematic review and comparative meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Leptin may play a role in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and it remains unclear if levels are raised compared to controls. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing leptin levels among people with schizophrenia and controls.

METHOD

Two authors independently searched major electronic databases from inception until June 2015 for studies measuring blood leptin levels among people with schizophrenia and controls. Random effects meta-analysis calculating hedges g and 95% confidence intervals (CI) and meta-regression analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven articles representing 1674 individuals with schizophrenia (34.6 ± 6.8 years, 55% male (0-100%), BMI 25.2 ± 3.1) and 2033 controls (33.9 ± 7.0 years, 51% male (0-100%), BMI=24.1 ± 2.1) were included. Across all studies, leptin levels may be marginally higher in schizophrenia (g=0.164, 95% CI -0.014-0.341, p=0.07, Q=217, p<0.01), particularly when one outlier was removed (g=0.196, 95% CI 0.210-0.370, p=0.02) and when we included the smallest effect size from studies with multiple comparisons (g=0.318, 95% CI 0.125-0.510, p=0.001). Leptin levels were higher in multi-episode schizophrenia (g=0.245, 95% CI 0.058-0.433, p=0.01) and females (g=0.557 95% CI 0.16-0.954, p=0.006). Subgroup analyses revealed leptin levels may be higher in participants taking second-generation antipsychotics compared to controls. Multivariate meta-regression demonstrated a lower percentage of males (β=-0.0064, 95% CI -0.0129 to -0.0002, p=0.05), but not BMI, moderated the results.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that schizophrenia is associated with increased blood leptin levels compared to controls, which may not be entirely attributable to antipsychotic medication or BMI. Other illness related and lifestyle choices may play a pivotal role.

Metformin for treatment of antipsychotic-induced weight gain in a South Asian population with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder: A double blind, randomized, placebo controlled study

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotic-induced weight gain causes serious health problems. We investigated the efficacy and safety of metformin in treating antipsychotic-induced weight gain in South Asian patients.

METHODS

Sixty six adult patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder treated, with atypical antipsychotics, and who had increased by more than 10% their pre treatment body weight, were randomly assigned to receive metformin or placebo in a double-blind study. Patients received usual treatment and metformin 500 mg or placebo twice daily for 24 weeks. The primary outcome measure was change in body weight from baseline to week 24. Linear mixed models were used in the analysis.

RESULTS

Mean change in body weight in the metformin group was -1.56 kg (95% CI=-3.06 to -0.05) and 1.0 kg (95% CI=0.03-1.97) in the placebo group. Between-group difference was 2.56 kg. At 24 weeks the between-group difference showed significant time-by-treatment interaction (F=3.23, p=0.004). Between-group difference in BMI showed significant time-by-treatment interaction (F=3.41 p=0.03). There was no significant difference in waist-hip ratio or fasting blood sugar.

CONCLUSIONS

Metformin is effective in reducing weight in South Asian patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who had increased their body by more than 10% after treatment with atypical antipsychotics.

Drug-Induced Diabetes Mellitus: Evidence for Statins and Other Drugs Affecting Glucose Metabolism

Abnormalities of glucose metabolism and glucose tolerance, either because of a reduction in tissue sensitivity to insulin (e.g., in liver, skeletal muscle, and adipose tissues) and/or a reduction in pancreatic insulin secretion, are associated with a number of unwanted health outcomes. Even small increases in circulating glucose levels (often described as dysglycemia or prediabetes) may confer an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease and progression to overt type 2 diabetes. A number of drug therapies, many of them used long term in chronic disease management, have adverse effects on glucose metabolism, diabetes risk, and glycemic control among patients with preexisting diabetes. In this study, we review the evidence, underlying mechanisms, and the clinical significance of drug-related adverse effects on glucose metabolism.

Risk of metabolic syndrome and its components in people with schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components are highly predictive of cardiovascular diseases. The primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the prevalence of MetS and its components in people with schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder, comparing subjects with different disorders and taking into account demographic variables and psychotropic medication use. The secondary aim was to compare the MetS prevalence in persons with any of the selected disorders versus matched general population controls. The pooled MetS prevalence in people with severe mental illness was 32.6% (95% CI: 30.8%-34.4%; N = 198; n = 52,678). Relative risk meta-analyses established that there was no significant difference in MetS prevalence in studies directly comparing schizophrenia versus bipolar disorder, and in those directly comparing bipolar disorder versus major depressive disorder. Only two studies directly compared people with schizophrenia and major depressive disorder, precluding meta-analytic calculations. Older age and a higher body mass index were significant moderators in the final demographic regression model (z = -3.6, p = 0.0003, r(2)  = 0.19). People treated with all individual antipsychotic medications had a significantly (p<0.001) higher MetS risk compared to antipsychotic-naïve participants. MetS risk was significantly higher with clozapine and olanzapine (except vs. clozapine) than other antipsychotics, and significantly lower with aripiprazole than other antipsychotics (except vs. amisulpride). Compared with matched general population controls, people with severe mental illness had a significantly increased risk for MetS (RR = 1.58; 95% CI: 1.35-1.86; p<0.001) and all its components, except for hypertension (p = 0.07). These data suggest that the risk for MetS is similarly elevated in the diagnostic subgroups of severe mental illness. Routine screening and multidisciplinary management of medical and behavioral conditions is needed in these patients. Risks of individual antipsychotics should be considered when making treatment choices.

Antipsychotic medications and extreme weight gain in two health systems

OBJECTIVE

We conducted this study to investigate the rate of clinically important, extreme weight gain (EWG; ≥7% body weight gain) among all second generation antipsychotic (SGA) users in two large health care systems in the United States.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort study.

METHODS

We used electronic medical record databases of two health systems to identify adults aged 18-79 years who from 1 January 2004 to 31 December 2011 had initiated a SGA medication. All patients had to have a minimum of two weight measures in the medical record: (1) one or more weights in the 180-day pre-treatment (baseline) period; and (2) one or more weights in the first year after initiating SGA treatment.

RESULTS

We found that EWG occurred in 7.7-17.0% of SGA users. At one year, the average weight gain was nearly 10kg among SGA users who experienced EWG. Olanzapine was the SGA most commonly associated with EWG with a rate of 17.0 per 100 users [95% confidence interval (CI): 14.2-20.5], while ziprasidone was least commonly associated with EWG (7.7 per 100 users; 95% CI: 4.6-13.0).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that clinically-important weight gain was common after the initiation of SGA treatment, and the EWG phenotype was easily identifiable within electronic medical records. There was significant heterogeneity in the rate of EWG across SGA medications. Weight gains of this magnitude are likely to have adverse health consequences and there is a significant unmet opportunity for physicians to identify these events and mitigate the harms of SGA use.

Identification and management of tardive dyskinesia: A case series and literature review

Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a serious, disabling and potentially permanent, neurological hyperkinetic movement disorder that occurs after months or years of taking dopamine receptor-blocking agents. The pathophysiology of TD is complex, multifactorial and still not fully understood. Although there is no identified effective and standard treatment for TD, several agents have been tried for the management of this motor disturbance. The aim of this case series is to review the literature in regard to the identification, diagnosis and the treatment of TD with anticholinergics, anticholinergic medication withdrawal, cholinergic agents, botulinum toxin intramuscular injections, tetrabenazine, levetiracetam, propranolol and zolpidem, and to describe one case of TD that responded favorably to clonazepam and two cases of TD that responded favorably to Ginkgo biloba.