Hydroxyurea for patients with essential thrombocythemia and a high risk of thrombosis

Pharmacokinetics of hydroxyurea in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus type I

In a prospective, randomized, controlled, three-arm study, the pharmacokinetics of hydroxyurea administered as an antiviral agent in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) were evaluated. The three arms of the study consisted of azidothymidine (AZT) 250 mg twice daily, hydroxyurea 500 mg twice daily, or a combination of the two. Nine patients receiving hydroxyurea in monotherapy (n = 4) or in combination with AZT (n = 5) agreed to undergo multiple venipunctures for pharmacokinetic analysis. Sample collection was performed at steady-state conditions and serum concentration-time data for hydroxyurea were fitted using a one-compartment model. Mean (+/- standard deviation) peak concentration (Cmax) was 0.135 +/- 0.06 mmol/L and mean trough level (Cmin) was 0.0085 +/- 0.003 mmol/L. Mean concentration at steady state was 0.045 +/- 0.006 mmol/L. Apparent clearance (Cl/F) was 0.18 +/- 0.005 L/hr/kg, and half-life (t1/2) was 2.5 +/- 0.5 hours. Hydroxyurea given orally to patients infected with HIV-1 was well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, with a tmax of 0.85 to 0.96 hours after ingestion. Serum levels of hydroxyurea ranged from 0.01 to 0.13 mmol/L. These values are similar to the concentrations (between 0.01 and 0.1 mmol/L) demonstrated to inhibit HIV-1 in vitro. Our data show that hydroxyurea given at a dosage of 500 mg twice daily is sufficient to yield serum concentrations potentially useful for in vivo inhibition of HIV-1.

Thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications in chronic myeloproliferative disorders

Bleeding and thrombosis are major causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic myeloproliferative disorders. We retrospectively evaluated 101 consecutive patients affected by primary thrombocytosis (46 male, 55 female, aged 18-84 years; mean +/- SD 61 +/- 15) followed for a period ranging from 6 months up to 10 years (median 5 years) at our hematological unit. At the time of diagnosis 48 patients were asymptomatic; 26 had clinical evidence of atherothrombosis (cerebral ischemic attacks, ischemic heart disease, peripheral occlusive arterial disease), ten had venous thrombosis, four experienced major hemorrhages, 23 presented microvascular ischemic manifestations namely erythromelalgia, paresthesias, acrocyanosis and dizziness. At presentation 51.2% of the patients had elevated serum lactic dehydrogenase, 34.5% hyperuricemia, and 23.4% serum creatinine > 1.2 mg/dL. Color Doppler ultrasound provided evidence of vascular stenosis or medium-intimal hyperplasia of epiaortic vessels in 48.9% of patients studied, and similar alterations of lower limb arteries in 23.8% of cases. Therapy modality included an antiplatelet agent (picotamide 300 mg/bid); a cytoreductive agent (busulphan, hydroxyurea, pipobroman or melphalan) was used when platelet count was > 800000/microL. Symptoms due to microvascular ischemia promptly regressed after picotamide and cytoreductive therapy. During follow-up. nine patients suffered from atherothrombotic events (transient ischemic attacks, ischemic stroke, unstable angina pectoris) and five developed deep vein thrombosis or superficial thrombophlebitis. Five patients experienced major hemorrhages (two melena, two hematuria, one perioperative bleeding); the two gastrointestinal hemorrhages occurred in patients self-medicated with non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and the two episodes of hematuria occurred on oral anticoagulant therapy and aspirin respectively. No major bleeding occurred in patients on continuative therapy with picotamide, even in the presence of upper digestive tract disorders. Seven patients died: mortality resulted from one sudden coronary death, three solid neoplasia, one blast crisis, one anile, and one massive hemorrhage due to abdominal aortic prosthesis tearing. Our study suggests that a long-term antithrombotic prophylaxis with picotamide may be of benefit in patients affected by primary thrombocytosis; a controlled clinical trial is warranted to assess whether picotamide can ameliorate the natural history of the disease.

Ischemic stroke as first manifestation of essential thrombocythemia. Report of six cases

BACKGROUND

Ischemic stroke as a presenting sign of essential thrombocythemia has been infrequently reported. We describe six patients in whom cerebrovascular disease was the first manifestation of this myeloproliferative disease. A positive endogenous megakaryocyte and/or erythroid colony growth from blood was a diagnostic criterion of essential thrombocythemia in patients with platelets counts lower than 600 x 10(9)/L.

CASE DESCRIPTIONS

These six patients represented 0.54% of all patients with first stroke, 42.8% of all hematologic disorders associated with stroke, and 12.5% of all patients with essential thrombocythemia diagnosed from 1986 to 1992 at our institution. Eleven acute cerebrovascular accidents (6 transient ischemic attacks, 5 definitive cerebral infarcts) were registered. Mean time from ischemic stroke to diagnosis of essential thrombocythemia was 4.5 months (range, 1 to 12 months). The mean platelet count was 597 x 10(9)/L (range, 414 to 760 x 10(9)/L). Four patients had platelets counts lower than 600 x 10(9)/L. All patients had circulating erythroid progenitors, megakaryocytic progenitors, or both.

CONCLUSIONS

Ischemic stroke as a presenting manifestation of essential thrombocythemia is probably underrecognized. The diagnosis of thrombocythemia should not be excluded on the basis of platelet counts lower than 600 x 10(9)/L. The availability of in vitro culture of hematopoietic progenitors from peripheral blood makes it possible to diagnose early and atypical cases.