Identifying specific causes of kidney allograft loss

Donor age and renal P-glycoprotein expression associate with chronic histological damage in renal allografts

The contributions of donor kidney quality (partially determined by donor age), allograft rejection, and calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity on the progression of histologic damage of renal allografts are not completely defined. Moreover, the determinants of individual susceptibility to calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity are not known but may include variability in drug transport and metabolism. In a prospective cohort of 252 adult renal allograft recipients treated with a combination of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids, we studied 744 renal allograft biopsies obtained regularly from time of transplantation for 3 yr. We assessed determinants of histologic evolution, including tacrolimus exposure, renal P-glycoprotein (ABCB1) expression, and polymorphisms in the CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and ABCB1 genes. Within the first 3 yr after transplantation, we noted a progressive increase in interstitial fibrosis, tubular atrophy, glomerulosclerosis, and vascular intimal thickening. Older donor age, absence of P-glycoprotein expression at the apical membrane of tubular epithelial cells, and combined donor-recipient homozygosity for the C3435T variant in ABCB1 significantly associated with increased susceptibility to chronic allograft damage independent of graft quality at implantation. Changes in graft function over time reflected these associations with donor age and ABCB1 polymorphisms, but it was acute T cell-mediated and antibody-mediated rejection that determined early graft survival. In conclusion, the effects of older donor age reach beyond the quality of the allograft at implantation and continue to be important for histologic evolution in the posttransplantation period. In addition, ABCB1 genotype and expression of P-glycoprotein in renal tubular epithelial cells determine susceptibility to chronic tubulointerstitial damage of transplanted kidneys.

KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients

The 2009 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guideline on the monitoring, management, and treatment of kidney transplant recipients is intended to assist the practitioner caring for adults and children after kidney transplantation. The guideline development process followed an evidence-based approach, and management recommendations are based on systematic reviews of relevant treatment trials. Critical appraisal of the quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The guideline makes recommendations for immunosuppression, graft monitoring, as well as prevention and treatment of infection, cardiovascular disease, malignancy, and other complications that are common in kidney transplant recipients, including hematological and bone disorders. Limitations of the evidence, especially on the lack of definitive clinical outcome trials, are discussed and suggestions are provided for future research.

Post-transplant monitoring of renal allografts: are we there yet?

Transplantation has emerged as the therapy of choice for many patients with end organ failure. One of the major goals is to tailor immunosuppressive therapy to the individual needs of every patient to balance the risk for rejection and over-immunosuppression. This will require diagnostic tools that can detect harmful processes in the allograft early, and that can be measured repeatedly. This review will consider recent advances in our understanding of the molecular nature of these processes and how this information is being utilized to design novel diagnostic assays to non-invasively monitor allografts. Highlighted is the need for large-scale prospective multi-centre studies to validate assays that show early promise in single centre studies.

Can protocol biopsy better inform our choices in renal transplantation?

The use of protocol biopsies has provided insights into the pathogenesis of many renal allograft diseases. It is now widely accepted that acute and chronic immune injury, as well as other pathologies associated with eventual graft loss, may occur initially in the absence of graft dysfunction. Indeed, renal transplant biopsies performed at the time of graft dysfunction may disclose advanced stages of renal injury that may not be amenable to treatment. However, protocol biopsies have several limitations that include their morbidity, cost, and potential for sampling error. Furthermore, the prevalence of early subclinical rejection is decreasing in the modern era of immunosuppression, which argues against their use in patients of low immunological risk. Conversely, the transplantation community has, perhaps unadvisedly, embarked upon protocols of immunosuppressive drug minimization. The consequences of these practices may result in late inflammation in the graft that could prove deleterious to its function in the long term. It is hoped that in the future "systems biology" techniques (eg, genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics) may guide clinicians regarding the safety of drug minimization protocols, inform them as to when a renal transplant biopsy should be procured, and perhaps one day replace the renal transplant biopsy altogether. Until such time, however, the renal biopsy remains an indispensable tool in the management of renal transplant recipients.