Update on cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections and their management: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association

Re-evaluation of transvenous lead extraction with modified standard technique: a prospective study in 229 patients

As new-type powered sheaths are expensive and unavailable, the standard lead extraction techniques remain the mainstay in clinical applications in many countries. The purpose of this study was to re-evaluate the clinical application of the standard lead extraction techniques and equipment, and make some procedural modifications and innovations. In our center, between January 2006 and May 2012, 229 patients (median, 66 years) who underwent lead extraction due to infection and lead malfunction were registered and followed up prospectively with respect to clinical features, reasons for lead extraction, technical characteristics, and clinical prognosis. A total of 440 leads had to be extracted transvenously by using special tools from 229 patients (male, 72.1%). Vegetations ≥1 cm were detected in six patients. Locking Stylets were applied for 398 (90.5%) leads. Telescoping dilator polypropylene sheaths and counter traction technique were used for 202 (45.9%) leads due to lead adhesion, and the mean implant duration of the 202 leads was longer than the other 238 leads (48.9±22.6 vs. 26.6±17.8 months; P <0.01). In addition, modified isolation and snare techniques were used for 56 leads (12.7%). Minor and major procedure-related complications occurred in three (1.3%) and four (1.7%) cases respectively, including one death (0.4%). Severe lead residue occurred in one case. Complete procedural success rate was 96.1% (423/440), and clinical success rate was 98.9% (435/440). The median follow-up period was 18 (1-76) months. No infection- and procedure-related death occurred in our series. Our data demonstrated that high clinical success rate of transvenous lead extraction can be guaranteed by making full use of the standard lead extraction techniques and equipment with individualized modifications.

Cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections in left ventricular assist device recipients

BACKGROUND

Most patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have concomitant cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). However, clinical presentation and outcome of CIED infection in the setting of LVAD has not been previously described.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 247 patients who underwent LVAD implantation at Mayo Clinic campuses in Minnesota, Arizona, and Florida, from January 2005 to December 2011. Demographic and clinical data of patients who met criteria for CIED infection were extracted.

RESULTS

Of 247 patients with LVADs, 215 (87%) had CIED at the time of LVAD implantation and six (2.8%) subsequently developed CIED infections. Three patients developed CIED lead-related endocarditis and the other three had pocket infection. All three instances of CIED pocket infection were preceded by device generator exchange, whereas all three patients with CIED lead-related endocarditis had prior LVAD-related infections. Causative pathogens included Pseudomonas aeruginos (1), coagulase-negative staphylococci (2), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (1), a gram-positive bacillus (1), and culture negative (2). All patients underwent complete CIED removal along with antimicrobial therapy. The three patients with CIED lead-related endocarditis and prior LVAD infections received chronic suppressive antibiotic therapy, and one patient had LVAD exchange. All but one remained alive at the last follow-up with a median duration of 15 months (7-46 months) from the time of CIED infection.

CONCLUSION

Patients who are receiving LVAD therapy and develop CIED infection should be managed with complete CIED removal. Chronic suppressive antibiotic therapy is warranted in cases that have concomitant LVAD infection.

[Pacemaker dependant and/or repetitive ICD therapies. How to solve the dilemma of lead extraction?]

Bridging pacemaker-dependent patients or patients with repetitive ICD therapies after device and lead extraction is often challenging. Temporary pacing by means of an active fixation lead connected to an external reusable permanent pacemaker, or of a subxiphoidally implanted pacemaker with an epicardial lead is a safe option for bridging pacemaker-dependent patients after device and lead explantation. The wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD; LifeVest(®)) is a safe and effective tool for patients who need a continuous monitoring and ICD backup after device explantation.

Bridge to recovery or permanent system implantation: an eight-year single-center experience in transvenous semipermanent pacing

BACKGROUND

To compare the risks, implications, and outcomes of transvenous semipermanent pacing as a bridge to permanent system implantation or recovery.

METHODS

We investigated semipermanent transvenous pacing systems consisting of one (n = 57%) or two (n = 3%) bipolar active-fixation pacing leads and an attached epicutaneous pulse generator implanted from 2000 to 2009. The study population comprised 60 patients aged 72.9 ± 10.5 years (44 [73.3%] male). Forty-two (70%) were enrolled for complete system explantation for cardiac-implanted electronic devices associated infection. Eighteen (30%) required temporary pacing in the context of a variety of mostly severe cardiac and noncardiac conditions. The semipermanent pacing systems were removed after implantation of permanent systems or recovery of a noncompromising heart rhythm, respectively.

RESULTS

Transvenous semipermanent lead implantation was successful in 59 (98.3%) patients. Major and minor intraoperative complications occurred in one case (1.7%) each. The semipermanent systems were left in situ for a mean period of 14.6 ± 8.1 days). They served as a bridge to permanent system implantation in 68.3% (n = 41) and as a bridge to recovery of a noncompromising heart rhythm in 11.7% (n = 7). Four patients (8.3%) died with the semipermanent pacing system in situ, and seven (11.7%) were transferred to external hospitals with semipermanent pacing systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Transvenous semipermanent pacing with bipolar active-fixation leads and epicutaneous pulse generators provide an important option for prolonged temporary pacing as a bridge to permanent system implantation or recovery.

Current trends in the management of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections

Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections are an emerging clinical problem. A growing number of dedicated and high quality clinical studies are currently being generated. We here review the most recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with CIED infection including intracardiac lead endocarditis. We discuss the current etiology and risk factors, and appraise the major diagnostic issues, describing our center's therapeutic approach. We also address the management of CIED infection complications.

[Device related infections. How to identify and how to treat]

Because of the enormous increase in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implants, the number of device-related infections has also increased considerably. In fact, this increase has been out of proportion due to the higher patient age at implant, the increased co-morbidity of patients and the higher complexity of the implanted devices. Apart from few exceptions the infection of a pacemaker or ICD requires complete explantation of the whole system with adjunctive antibiotic therapy. The diagnosis of device infection, the indication and different options for therapy are thoroughly discussed in this article according to the current status of knowledge.

Clinical manifestations and management of left ventricular assist device-associated infections

BACKGROUND

Infection is a serious complication of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy. Published data regarding LVAD-associated infections (LVADIs) are limited by single-center experiences and use of nonstandardized definitions.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 247 patients who underwent continuous-flow LVAD implantation from January 2005 to December 2011 at Mayo Clinic campuses in Minnesota, Arizona, and Florida. LVADIs were defined using the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation criteria.

RESULTS

We identified 101 episodes of LVADI in 78 patients (32%) from this cohort. Mean age (± standard deviation [SD]) was 57±15 years. The majority (94%) underwent Heartmate II implantation, with 62% LVADs placed as destination therapy. The most common type of LVADIs were driveline infections (47%), followed by bloodstream infections (24% VAD related, and 22% non-VAD related). The most common causative pathogens included gram-positive cocci (45%), predominantly staphylococci, and nosocomial gram-negative bacilli (27%). Almost half (42%) of the patients were managed by chronic suppressive antimicrobial therapy. While 14% of the patients had intraoperative debridement, only 3 underwent complete LVAD removal. The average duration (±SD) of LVAD support was 1.5±1.0 years. At year 2 of follow-up, the cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality was estimated to be 43%.

CONCLUSION

Clinical manifestations of LVADI vary on the basis of the type of infection and the causative pathogen. Mortality remained high despite combined medical and surgical intervention and chronic suppressive antimicrobial therapy. Based on clinical experiences, a management algorithm for LVADI is proposed to assist in the decision-making process.

Transcutaneous lead implantation connected to an externalized pacemaker in patients with implantable cardiac defibrillator/pacemaker infection and pacemaker dependency

AIMS

Systemic cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection is a serious complication, especially in patients with pacemaker (PM) dependency. In those patients after infectious device removal temporary pacing is necessary, to obtain adequate haemodynamics. In this study, a new therapy option with temporary pacing by ipsilateral implantation of a new active-fixation right ventricular (RV)-lead was evaluated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between September 2009 and November 2011, infectious lead removal was performed in 17 patients with systemic CIED infection. Temporary pacing was achieved by simultaneous implantation of a new active-fixation RV-lead, which then was connected extracorporally to the old CIED device. Antibiotic therapy was initiated. When laboratory infection parameters were in normal range and blood culture samples showed negative results, new CIED was implanted on contralateral side and temporary RV-lead was removed. Mean patients' age was 71.3 ± 9.1 years. Mean C-reactive protein values were 79.3 mg/dL, and mean leucocytes counts were 12.6 × 10(3). After lead extraction, temporary pacing was necessary in all patients due to severe bradycardia. Mean duration of temporary pacing was 12.7 (6-24) days. No major procedure-related peri- or post-operative adverse events occurred. Mean time of hospitalization was 20.8 (10-48) days. Mean follow-up time was 21.1 months (12-36), showing survival rate of 100% and freedom from reinfection in all patients.

CONCLUSION

Ipsilateral implantation of a temporary active-fixation RV-lead connected to an externalized PM and pursued antibiotic therapy seems to be a good option for patients with CIED infection and PM dependency, showing no temporary pacing-related complications and no reinfection after mean follow-up time of 21.1 months.

Comparison of bacterial adherence to titanium versus polyurethane for cardiac implantable electronic devices

Implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) has dramatically increased over the past several years. Although several preventive measures have been implemented, there has been a disproportional increase in the number of CIED-related infections. To evaluate the adherence of bacteria to polyurethane and titanium, the 2 surfaces that coat the CIED, we proceeded with an in vitro study using the most common microorganisms responsible for CIED-related infections. Original, unused 1 × 1 centimeter titanium and polyurethane flat plates were incubated with coagulase-negative staphylococci, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Each experiment was repeated 5 times. After incubating the titanium and polyurethane plates for 3, 6, 12, or 24 hours, all 3 organisms displayed a higher grade of bacterial adherence to the polyurethane versus titanium surfaces (p = 0.01). In conclusion, to decrease the rate of bacterial adherence, especially during the immediate postimplantation period when the CIED is at high risk for bacterial adherence, colonization, and infection, it may be prudent to consider constructing CIED surfaces with a higher proportion of titanium over polyurethane. Animal studies are warranted to explore the relevance of these laboratory findings.

Follow-up of patients with new cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: is adherence to the experts' recommendations associated with improved outcomes?

BACKGROUND

A 2008 expert consensus statement recommended an in-person follow-up visit between 2 and 12 weeks after the placement of a new cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED).

OBJECTIVE

To assess outcomes associated with adherence to the experts' recommendations.

METHODS

By using data from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry's (NCDR) ICD Registry linked to Medicare claims, we studied the association between follow-up within 2-12 weeks after CIED placement between January 1, 2005, and September 30, 2008, and all-cause mortality and risk of readmission within 1 year.

RESULTS

Compared with patients who did not receive the recommended follow-up (n = 43,060), those who did (n = 30,256) were more likely to be older, white, to have received a cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator device, to have more advanced heart failure symptoms, and to have nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. In Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for patient demographic and clinical factors, mortality was lower (hazard ratio [HR] 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-0.98; P = .005) but cardiovascular readmission was higher (HR 1.04; 95% CI 1.01-1.08; P = .012) among patients who received initial follow-up within 2-12 weeks after CIED placement compared with those who did not. There was no association between CIED follow-up and readmission for heart failure (HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.96-1.05; P = .878) or device-related infection (HR 1.22; 95% CI 0.98-1.51; P = .075).

CONCLUSIONS

Follow-up within 2-12 weeks after CIED placement was independently associated with improved survival but increased cardiovascular readmission. Quality improvement initiatives designed to increase adherence to experts' recommendations may be warranted.

Implantable defibrillator lead extraction with optimized standard extraction techniques

Background

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads might not be extracted especially in developing countries because of the high cost and lack of specialized tools. We aimed to evaluate transvenous extraction of ICD leads using optimized standard techniques.

Methods

We prospectively analyzed clinical characteristics, optimized extraction techniques and the feasibility of extraction for 40 patients (33 males; mean age 47.9 ± 16.1 years) with 42 ICD leads.

Results

Complete procedural success rate was 95.2% (40/42), and the clinical success rate was 97.6% (41/42). One ICD lead required cardiothoracic surgery. Minor complications occurred in three cases (7.5%), and no major complications or death occurred. Locking stylets were used to extract most leads (34, 81.0%) and almost half of the leads (20, 47.6%) required mechanical dilatation to free fibrotic adhesions; these leads had been implanted for a longer period of time than the others (43.7 ± 18.2 vs. 18.4 ± 13.4 months, P < 0.05). Three-quarters of the leads (30, 71.4%) were extracted with locking stylets plus manual traction (12, 28.6%), or mechanical dilatation with counter-traction (18, 42.8%) by the superior vena cava approach and one-quarter of the leads (11, 26.2%) were removed by optimized snare techniques using the femoral vein approach. Median extraction time was 20 min (range 2–68 min) per lead. Linear regression analysis showed that the extraction time was significantly correlated with implant duration (r = 0.70, P < 0.001). Median follow-up was 14.5 months (range 1–58 months), no infection, or procedure-related death occurred in our series.

Conclusions

Our optimized procedure for transvenous extraction of ICD leads provides a practical and low-cost method for standard procedures.

Usefulness of intracardiac echocardiography for the diagnosis of cardiovascular implantable electronic device-related endocarditis

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to compare transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) for the diagnosis of cardiac device-related endocarditis (CDI).

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE) was established by using the modified Duke criteria based mainly on echocardiography and blood culture results. No previous studies have compared ICE with TEE for the diagnosis of IE.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 162 patients (age 72 ± 11 years; 125 male) who underwent transvenous lead extraction: 152 with CDI and 10 with lead malfunction (control group). Using the modified Duke criteria, we divided the patients with infection into 3 groups: 44 with a "definite" diagnosis of IE (group 1), 52 with a "possible" diagnosis of IE (group 2), and 56 with a "rejected" diagnosis of IE (group 3). TEE and ICE were performed before the procedure.

RESULTS

In group 1, ICE identified intracardiac masses (ICM) in all 44 patients; TEE identified ICM in 32 patients (73%). In group 2, 6 patients (11%) had ICE and TEE both positive for ICM, 8 patients (15%) had a negative TEE but a positive ICE, and 38 patients (73%) had ICE and TEE both negative. In group 3, 2 patients (3%) had ICM both at ICE and TEE, 1 patient (2%) had an ICM at ICE and a negative TEE, and 53 patients (95%) had no ICM at ICE and TEE. ICE and TEE were both negative in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

ICE represents a useful technique for the diagnosis of ICM, thus providing improved imaging of right-sided leads and increasing the diagnostic yield compared with TEE.

The role of intravenous catheters in cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections: identifying potential targets for prevention

Infections related to cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are increasing in prevalence and carry substantial morbidity and mortality. Complications involving peripheral intravenous catheters resulting in CIED infections have not yet been investigated and may pose an important risk factor. We report 5 cases of CIED infection related to documented complications of peripheral vascular devices.

Pacemaker lead infection and related bacteraemia caused by normal and small colony variant phenotypes of Bacillus licheniformis

Here, we report what we believe to be the first case of bacteraemia with small colony variants of Bacillus licheniformis related to a pacemaker lead infection by B. licheniformis displaying the normal phenotype. Arbitrarily primed PCR analysis showed a clonal strain. The infection was cured after the removal of the infected device.

Utility and safety of temporary pacing using active fixation leads and externalized re-usable permanent pacemakers after lead extraction

AIMS

After extraction of an infected cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) in a pacemaker-dependent patient, a temporary pacemaker wire may be required for long periods during antibiotic treatment. Loss of capture and under sensing are commonly observed over time with temporary pacemaker wires, and patient mobility is restricted. The use of an externalized permanent active-fixation pacemaker lead connected to a permanent pacemaker generator for temporary pacing may be beneficial because of improved lead stability, and greater patient mobility and comfort. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of a temporary permanent pacemaker (TPPM) system in patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction due to CIED infection.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Of 47 patients who underwent lead extraction due to CIED infection over a 2-year period at our centre, 23 were pacemaker dependent and underwent TPPM implantation. A permanent pacemaker lead was implanted in the right ventricle via the internal jugular vein and connected to a TPPM generator, which was secured externally at the base of the neck. The TPPM was used for a mean of 19.4 ± 11.9 days (median 18 days, range 3-45 days), without loss of capture or sensing failure in any patient. Twelve of 23 patients were discharged home or to a nursing facility with the TPPM until completion of antibiotic treatment and re-implantation of a new permanent pacemaker.

CONCLUSION

External TPPMs are safe and effective in patients requiring long-term pacing after infected CIED removal.

Long-term outcome of complete cardiovascular implantable electronic device removal with cardiopulmonary bypass

Definitive endovascular techniques have been developed for pacemaker lead extraction; however, a few patients require immediate secondary open heart surgery because of incomplete transvenous lead extraction. This study examined the safety, effectiveness, and long-term outcome of the removal of cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) via median sternotomy under cardiopulmonary bypass. The removal of CIED was performed in 6 patients (mean age 57 ± 16 years, 5 males and 1 female), from September 2000 to April 2011. The reasons for removal included eradication of an infection in 5 patients and elimination of pacemaker component allergy in 1. Positive culture results, including methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA, n = 2), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA, n = 1), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS, n = 1), and methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis (MRSE, n = 1) were observed in all 5 infected patients. Mitral annuloplasty (n = 1), mitral valvuloplasty (n = 1), tricuspid annuloplasty (n = 3). Implantation of myocardial pacing leads (n = 5) were performed concomitantly (n = 4), or secondarily (n = 1). All 6 patients were alive in good condition at 72 ± 55 months following CIED removal. New device infection occurred in 1 patient during long-term follow up. Complete surgical removal of pacing systems via median sternotomy with cardiopulmonary bypass is, therefore, considered to be safe and feasible with acceptable long term results.

Central vein stenosis

Central vein stenosis (CVS) is commonly seen in patients receiving hemodialysis through an arteriovenous access, threatening the usability of arteriovenous access for dialysis. Subclavian and internal jugular catheters are prime reasons for the development of CVS, especially in the setting of long-term use of multiple catheters. CVS related to cardiac rhythm devices also is seen frequently. Idiopathic CVS can be encountered, although it is less common. Clinical features ultimately become sufficiently prominent to prompt angiographic evaluation. CVS should be evaluated carefully because management must be individualized. The primary method for treatment of CVS is endovascular intervention, including angioplasty and stent placement, whereas surgical options should be pursued in only refractory cases due to the invasiveness of the intervention. Early referral of patients for chronic kidney disease care; timely discussion of kidney replacement modality choices, including nonhemodialysis options such as peritoneal dialysis and kidney transplantation; placement of arteriovenous access prior to the onset of dialysis; and avoidance of catheters and other central vein instrumentation will prevent the development of CVS in most patients with kidney disease.

Complications of cardiac implants: handling device infections

Managing patients with cardiac implantable electrophysiological devices (CIED) infections can be challenging. The first step should be prevention, which involves patient selection, timing of implantation, and the procedure itself. After implantation, a high degree of suspicion should be applied in order to correctly diagnose patients with infected implanted devices. It is necessary to recognize that patients can present with a wide variety of signs and symptoms. Once diagnosed, the next step is determining if it is a local pocket infection or system infection. In almost every patient, in addition to antibiotics, complete removal of ALL hardware is required. Transvenous lead extraction is now safe and effective, but should only be performed at experienced centres with a practiced extraction team, all possible needed equipment, and cardiothoracic surgical backup. After extraction, the indication for CIED therapy should be re-evaluated to determine re-implantation is warranted. Timing of re-implantation depends on a variety of factors such as type of infection or valvular involvement and should be made in concordance with an infectious disease specialist. This review is aimed at introducing the steps needed to manage patients with infected cardiac devices.

Sonication of explanted cardiac implants improves microbial detection in cardiac device infections

The sonication technique has been shown to be a promising tool for microbiological diagnosis of device-related infections. We evaluated the usefulness of the sonication method for pathogen detection in 80 explanted cardiac components collected from 40 patients, and the results were compared with those of conventional cultures. Forty subjects undergoing cardiac device removal were studied: 20 had cardiac device infection, and 20 subjects underwent elective generator replacement or revision in the absence of infection. Sonication of explanted devices was more sensitive than traditional culture for microbial detection (67% and 50%, respectively; P = 0.0005). The bacterial count detected in sonication fluid culture was significantly higher than that detected in traditional culture in both infected (P = 0.019) and uninfected (P = 0.029) devices. In the infected patients, sonication fluid culture yielded a significantly higher rate of pathogen detection in explanted electrodes than traditional culture (65% versus 45%; P = 0.02), while no differences were found in the generators. Ten strains were detected only through sonication fluid culture: 6 Staphylococcus epidermidis strains, 1 Staphylococcus hominis strain, 2 Corynebacterium striatum strains, and 1 Brevundimonas sp. Neither the type nor the duration of antimicrobial therapy before device removal had an effect on the diagnostic performance of sonication fluid culture (P = 0.75 and P = 0.56, respectively). In the patients without infection, sonication fluid culture was positive in 8 cases (40%), whereas conventional culture was positive in only 4 (20%). In summary, the sonication technique improves the microbiological diagnosis of explanted cardiac devices.

Diagnostic yield of FDG positron-emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with CEID infection: a pilot study

AIMS

Whole body imaging with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) has proven useful in various infectious diseases. The purpose of this pilot study was to assess the diagnostic yield of FDG PET/CT in patients with cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 21 patients with CIED infection were prospectively included. Diagnosis of CIED infection was made in accordance with current criteria. It was classified in three categories, i.e. superficial skin infection, pocket site infection, or cardiac device-related infective endocarditis (CDRIE). All patients underwent FDG PET/CT. Scans were interpreted blindly, i.e. without prior knowledge of diagnosis, by experienced nuclear medicine physicians. The accuracy of FDG PET/CT was assessed for each diagnostic category. Findings demonstrated superficial skin infection in 1 patient, pocket site infection in 15, and CDRIE in 13 (definite: 7; possible: 6). In patients with pocket site infection, the sensitivity and specificity of FDG PET/CT were 86.7% [59.5-98.3, 95% confidence interval (CI)] and 100% [42.1-100, 95% CI]. The only patient with superficial skin infection was accurately identified by FDG PET/CT. The sensitivity and specificity of FDG PET/CT in patients with CDRIE were 30.8% [9.1-61.4, 95% CI] and 62.5% [24.5-91.5, 95% CI]. Most false-negative results occurred in patients who had undergone previous antimicrobial treatment.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that FDG PET/CT is highly accurate for the diagnosis of skin and pocket CIED infection but low for infective endocarditis. This suggests that the reliability of FDG PET/CT findings in management decision making varies according to the type of CIED infection.

Sepsis syndrome, bloodstream infections, and device-related infections

The diagnosis of sepsis is challenging given the lack of appropriate diagnostic methods and the inaccuracy of diagnostic criteria. Early resuscitation, intravenous antibiotics, and source control are crucial in the management of septic patients. The treatment of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) often comprises 1 to 2 weeks of intravenous antibiotics plus catheter removal. Infections related to surgical devices are more difficult to manage because they require longer duration of therapy and possibly multiple surgical procedures. This review represents an update on the diagnosis and management of sepsis, catheter-related blood stream infections and some clinically important device-related infections.

Mycobacterium fortuitum causing infection of a biventricular pacemaker/implantable cardioverter defibrillator

Increased utilization of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) has seen a corresponding rise in related infections. Non-tuberculosis mycobacteria (NTM) are rarely the cause. Treatment involves susceptibilities, antimicrobials, and device removal. This study presents a patient who underwent a biventricular implantable cardioverter defibrillator upgrade with a multi-drug resistant Mycobacterium fortuitum located at the pocket site and a lead infection.