Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study

Intolerance reactions to knee arthroplasty in patients with nickel/cobalt allergy and disappearance of symptoms after revision surgery with titanium-based endoprostheses

Intolerance reactions to metal implants may present as dermatitis, impaired wound healing, effusions, pain or loosening. The clinical relevance of metal allergy in the differential diagnosis is often unclear and patients may even tolerate implants containing metals to which they are allergic. We present four patients with knee arthroplasty in whom after exclusion of infection or mechanical causes, a nickel/cobalt allergy led to replacement surgery with titanium-based prostheses. The subsequent alleviation of symptoms underlined the relevance and usefulness of allergological diagnostics in selected cases of complicated arthroplasty.

Primary extra-cranial meningioma following total hip replacement

A 61-year-old man presented with pain at the left hip and decreased mobility 10 years after total hip replacement. Imaging demonstrated a large destructive expansile mass adjacent to the prosthesis. Histological analysis confirmed the presence of an extra-cranial meningioma. Primary tumours after total hip replacement are rare and include soft tissue sarcomas, bone sarcomas and lymphomas. To our knowledge, no previous cases of primary extracranial meningioma have been identified. The imaging features, histology, pathogenesis and differential diagnosis are discussed.

2008 John Charnley award: metal ion levels after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized trial

Metal-on-metal bearing total hip arthroplasty is performed more commonly than in the past. There may be manufacturing differences such as clearance, roughness, metallurgy, and head size that affect performance. In a prospective, randomized trial, we compared 2-year postoperative ion levels for a 28-mm metal-on-polyethylene bearing with 28-mm and 36-mm metal-on-metal bearings. We measured serum, erythrocyte, and urine ion levels. We observed no difference in the ion levels for the 28-mm and 36-mm metal-on-metal bearings. The ion levels in these patients were lower than reported for most other metal-on-metal bearings. Although both erythrocyte and serum cobalt increased, erythrocyte chromium and erythrocyte titanium did not increase despite a four- to sixfold serum chromium and a three- to fourfold serum titanium increase. This may represent a threshold level for serum chromium and serum titanium below which erythrocytes are not affected.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Is patient selection important for hip resurfacing?

The optimal implant option for hip arthroplasty in the young, active patient remains controversial. There has been renewed interest for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing due to improved design and manufacturing of implants, better materials, enhanced implant fixation, theoretical advantages over conventional total hip arthroplasty, and recent Food and Drug Administration approval of two devices. Recent studies indicate satisfactory short- and midterm clinical results (1- to 10-year followup) with low complication rates, but there is a learning curve associated with this procedure, a more extensive surgical approach is necessary, and long-term results have yet to be determined. Proper patient selection may help avoid complications and improve patient outcomes. Patient selection criteria in the literature appear based predominantly on theoretical considerations without any consensus on stratifying patient risk. The most commonly reported complications encountered with hip resurfacing include femoral neck fracture, acetabular component loosening, metal hypersensitivity, dislocation, and nerve injury. At the time of clinical evaluation, patient age; gender; diagnosis; bone density, quality, and morphology; activity level; leg lengths; renal function; and metal hypersensitivity are important factors when considering a patient for hip resurfacing. Based on our review, we believe the best candidates for hip resurfacing are men under age 65 with osteoarthritis and relatively normal bony morphology.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V, prognostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The combined role of wear particles, macrophages and lymphocytes in the loosening of total joint prostheses

This review considers the causes of loosening of prosthetic joint replacement paying attention to the biological mechanisms rather than other effects that are physical, such as component fracture and other failure related to mechanical problems. Infection accounts for approximately 1.5 per cent of joint loosening and when it occurs it is a cause of serious concern to the surgeon. The loosening of prosthetic joints in the absence of infection is by far the most common reason for revision surgery and is known as aseptic loosening. While this may be multifactorial in terms of causation, and non-biological factors may contribute significantly in a particular individual, a significant part is undoubtedly played by the generation of wear debris, mainly from the bearing surfaces of the joint, and the cellular reaction to this in the implant bed. Phagocytic cells (macrophages and multinucleated giant cells) are the ones that remove foreign material from the tissues, and the ways in which these cells function in the interface between implant and bone are described. Mediators produced locally include numerous cytokines, enzymes and integrins. There is evidence for interactions between macrophages and locally recruited lymphocytes, which may or may not give rise to an immunologically mediated process.Sensitization of individuals having metal implants in place has been shown by positive skin tests or blood lymphocyte transformation tests and in these cases has been accompanied by loosening and failure of the replacement joint. The question remains as to whether this process is also present in a proportion of individuals with aseptic loosening in the absence of clearly defined clinical evidence of sensitization.Numerous studies performed by the author's group and, latterly, by others suggest that the cellular reactions detected in the tissues in cases of aseptic loosening are indeed those of contact sensitization. There is good evidence to show that a type IV cell-mediated immune reaction is taking place, with TH1 cell involvement and active antigen presentation. The extent to which sensitization is present in individual cases of aseptic loosening remains a subject for further work and this needs all the sophisticated molecular methods now available to modern biology to be applied in appropriate prospective clinical studies coupled with experimental models in vitro and in vivo. Immunological processes may play a more important part in joint loosening than previously considered.

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a review of periprosthetic biological reactions

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty has undergone a recent resurgence as an alternative treatment option for young and active patients with significant osteoarthritis. The claimed advantages of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty include lower wear rate, preservation of bone stock for subsequent revision procedures, restoration of anatomic hip mechanics, and enhanced stability due to the larger diameter of articulation. A disadvantage, however, is that the metal-on-metal resurfacing releases large amounts of very small wear particles and metal ions. The long-term biological consequences of the exposure to these Co-Cr particles and ions remain largely unknown. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the current literature on the adverse periprosthetic biological reactions associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Osteolysis with a cementless second generation metal-on-metal cup in total hip replacement

This study examined the long-term results of a metal-on-metal total hip replacement with a Metasul-lined cup. Twenty-nine total hip arthroplasties were performed in 27 young patients (mean age 49 years). Twenty-two patients (23 hips) were available for clinical and radiographic analysis after a mean duration of 99 months. Mean preoperative Harris hip score of 60 improved to 93 at most recent follow-up. One patient required revision of his cup for periacetabular osteolysis. Radiographic analysis showed osteolysis in another four hips. The high rate of osteolysis found in this series has not previously been reported with this type of implant. The length of follow-up in this series is greater than other reports in the literature and may explain this difference.

The effect of component size and orientation on the concentrations of metal ions after resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip

Increased concentrations of metal ions after metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip remain a concern. Although there has been no proven link to long-term health problems or early prosthetic failure, variables associated with high metal ion concentrations should be identified and, if possible, corrected. Our study provides data on metal ion levels from a series of 76 consecutive patients (76 hips) after resurfacing arthroplasty with the Articular Surface Replacement. Chromium and cobalt ion concentrations in the whole blood of patients with smaller (<or= 51 mm) femoral components were significantly higher than in those with the larger (>or= 53 mm) components (p < 0.01). Ion concentrations in the former group were significantly related to the inclination (p = 0.01) and anteversion (p = 0.01) of the acetabular component. The same relationships were not significant in the patients with larger femoral components (p = 0.61 and p = 0.49, respectively). Accurate positioning of the acetabular component intra-operatively is essential in order to reduce the concentration of metal ions in the blood after hip resurfacing arthroplasty with the Articular Surface Replacement implant.

Revision of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: the influence of malpositioning of the components

We have reviewed 42 patients who had revision of metal-on-metal resurfacing procedures, mostly because of problems with the acetabular component. The revisions were carried out a mean of 26.2 months (1 to 76) after the initial operation and most of the patients (30) were female. Malpositioning of the acetabular component resulted in 27 revisions, mostly because of excessive abduction (mean 69.9 degrees ; 56 degrees to 98 degrees ) or insufficient or excessive anteversion. Seven patients had more than one reason for revision. The mean increase in the diameter of the component was 1.8 mm (0 to 4) when exchange was needed. Malpositioning of the components was associated with metallosis and a high level of serum ions. The results of revision of the femoral component to a component with a modular head were excellent, but four patients had dislocation after revision and four required a further revision.

Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement

We examined the relationships between the serum levels of chromium and cobalt ions and the inclination angle of the acetabular component and the level of activity in 214 patients implanted with a metal-on-metal resurfacing hip replacement. Each patient had a single resurfacing and no other metal in their body. All serum measurements were performed at a minimum of one year after operation. The inclination of the acetabular component was considered to be steep if the abduction angle was greater than 55 degrees. There were significantly higher levels of metal ions in patients with steeply-inclined components (p = 0.002 for chromium, p = 0.003 for cobalt), but no correlation was found between the level of activity and the concentration of metal ions. A highly significant (p < 0.001) correlation with the arc of cover was found. Arcs of cover of less than 10 mm were correlated with a greater risk of high concentrations of serum metal ions. The arc of coverage was also related to the design of the component and to size as well as to the abduction angle of the acetabular component. Steeply-inclined acetabular components, with abduction angles greater than 55 degrees, combined with a small size of component are likely to give rise to higher serum levels of cobalt and chromium ions. This is probably due to a greater risk of edge-loading.

[Particle release in metal-on-metal bearings. A risk analysis]

Modern metal-on-metal bearings show very low wear rates but release particles and ions from the articulating surfaces into the joint and the whole organism. Especially during the run-in period an increased number of particles is produced. The released metal ions potentially trigger cytotoxic, cancerogenic and allergic reactions, which can impair the patient's health locally or systemically. Many surgeons fear a hypersensitivity reaction to the metal ions of the CoCr alloy in their patients. Today it is assumed that the incidence of these implant-related complications is very low but in some cases it will lead to early failure of the implant. Because the available alternative bearing combinations (ceramic-on-polyethylene and ceramic-on-ceramic) also bear the risk of severe complications, a final statement on the best and safest bearing choice for the patient cannot be made based on the currently existing data.

Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty

Although metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty (MOM THA) has been used for over 3 decades, substantial improvements in manufacturing and design have led to improved durability with modern implants. Reported advantages of the use of MOM THA include very low wear and subsequent osteolysis, increased range of motion to impingement secondary to the availability of larger diameter femoral heads, and the potential to monitor implant performance by serial assessment of metal ion levels. Clinical results of both first-generation and second-generation MOM THA have revealed good survivorship and a low incidence of osteolysis. Although the advantages of low wear and increased range of motion have made MOM THA an attractive bearing surface option, more widespread use of MOM bearing surfaces has been tempered with concern for increased metal ion levels and hypersensitivity reactions.

Bearings of the future for total hip arthroplasty

In the last decade or so, newer hip bearings such as ceramic-on-ceramic, metal-on-metal, and metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene were introduced into clinical practice in attempts to reduce the debris load released to the tissues after total hip arthroplasty. Present clinical evidence suggests that these newer bearings reduce both abrasive wear and the incidence of osteolysis at up to 10 years clinical follow-up. As further efforts to reduce abrasive wear may meet decreasing returns, we suggest that other bearing issues remain unresolved. These include mechanical failure, impingement or joint laxity, bearing noise, and stress shielding of supporting structures. We present a brief review of the current status of bearing technology and summarize potential areas for further research.

Metal sensitivity as a cause of groin pain in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing

We describe 4 patients pooled from our patient populations who presented with groin pain at different periods postoperatively after implantation of a metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Each patient underwent exploratory surgery after radiographic imaging, hematologic testing, and microbiological assessment of joint aspirations failed to explain their symptoms. Samples of periprosthetic tissues revealed extensive amounts of lymphocytic infiltrates that were suggestive of an immunologic reaction. The patients obtained complete resolution of symptoms subsequent to revision surgery. The incidence of implant failures resulting from metal sensitivity is unknown owing to the difficulty in making a confirmed diagnosis. The possibility that this is the source of groin pain should be considered when other reasons for symptoms of pain and/or joint effusion in hips with metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasties have been discounted.

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: advantages and disadvantages

Modern metal-on-metal resurfacing has recently gained popularity as an alternative to standard stemmed total hip arthroplasty. This study analyzed, from a literature review, the purported advantages and disadvantages of resurfacing with a comparison to standard hip arthroplasty. Advantages may include bone conservation on the femoral side with possible lower dislocation rates, more range-of-motion, more normal gait pattern, increased activity levels, increased ease of insertion with proximal femoral deformities or retained hardware, and straightforward revision. Possible disadvantages of resurfacing are increased difficulty to perform the procedure, increased acetabular bone stock loss, femoral neck fractures, and concerns about the effects of metal ions. Many of these issues will need further clarification by well-planned prospective studies and evaluation of longer-term outcomes.

Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings

We report 17 patients (20 hips) in whom metal-on-metal resurfacing had been performed and who presented with various symptoms and a soft-tissue mass which we termed a pseudotumour. Each patient underwent plain radiography and in some, CT, MRI and ultrasonography were also performed. In addition, histological examination of available samples was undertaken. All the patients were women and their presentation was variable. The most common symptom was discomfort in the region of the hip. Other symptoms included spontaneous dislocation, nerve palsy, a noticeable mass or a rash. The common histological features were extensive necrosis and lymphocytic infiltration. To date, 13 of the 20 hips have required revision to a conventional hip replacement. Two are awaiting revision. We estimate that approximately 1% of patients who have a metal-on-metal resurfacing develop a pseudotumour within five years. The cause is unknown and is probably multifactorial. There may be a toxic reaction to an excess of particulate metal wear debris or a hypersensitivity reaction to a normal amount of metal debris. We are concerned that with time the incidence of these pseudotumours may increase. Further investigation is required to define their cause.

Necrotic granulomatous pseudotumours in bilateral resurfacing hip arthoplasties: evidence for a type IV immune response

Clinical, radiological and histological findings were analysed in four patients who developed bilateral pseudotumours following metal-on-metal (MoM) resurfacing arthroplasties of both hips. Using a panel of monoclonal antibodies directed against HLA-DR, macrophages (CD14, CD68), dendritic cells (DC-SIGN, S100, CD11c), B cells (CD20), and T cells (CD3, CD4, CD8), the nature of the heavy inflammatory response seen in these cases was examined. Bilateral masses developed in periprosthetic soft tissues following the second MoM arthroplasty; these were characterised histologically by extensive coagulative necrosis, a heavy macrophage infiltrate and the presence of granulomas containing macrophages and giant cells; there was also a diffuse lymphocyte and variable plasma cell and eosinophil polymorph infiltrate. Immunohistochemistry showed strong expression of HLA-DR, CD14 and CD68 in both granulomatous and necrotic areas; lymphocytes were predominantly CD3+/CD4+ T cells. The clinical, morphological and immunophenotypic features of these necrotic granulomatous pseudotumours, which in all cases develop following a second resurfacing hip arthroplasty, is suggestive of a type IV immune response, possibly to MoM metal alloy components.

The imaging spectrum of peri-articular inflammatory masses following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing

INTRODUCTION

Resurfacing metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty is increasing in popularity, especially in younger patients. To date, studies indicate that the procedure is associated with a good outcome in the medium-term. Formation of a peri-articuar mass is a rarely reported complication. In this study we analyse the imaging findings in patients with resurfacing implants presenting to our institution with peri-articular masses identified on cross sectional imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients with documented peri-articular masses following resurfacing arthroplasty were included. The available imaging related to the masses was reviewed and the findings documented along with the patient's demographics.

RESULTS

There were 10 patients (13 joints). All patients were female. Patients presented with periprosthetic anterior or posterolateral solid and cystic masses. The anterior masses involved psoas muscle and were predominately solid. The posterolateral masses were predominately cystic. In the three cases with bilateral arthroplasties, masses were detected in both hips. Histology in six cases showed features compatible with a type IV hypersensitivity reaction.

CONCLUSIONS

The preponderance of females, the bilateral nature of the masses and the histological features suggest that peri-articular masses following resurfacing arthroplasty is due to the metal hypersensitivity.

[Orthopedic surgical implants and allergies. Joint statement by the Implant Allergy Working Group (AK 20) of the DGOOC (German Association of Orthopedics and Orthopedic Surgery), DKG (German Contact Dermatitis Research Group) and DGAKI (German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology)]

Materials used in osteosynthesis or artificial joint replacement are usually well tolerated. Complaints after such operations are mostly related to infection or mechanical problems but may also be caused by allergic reactions. The latter encompass skin changes, e.g., eczema, delayed wound/bone healing, recurrent effusion, pain, or implant loosening. In contrast to the high incidence of cutaneous metal contact allergy, allergies associated with implants are a rare condition. However, epidemiological data on the incidence of implant-related allergic reactions are still missing. Typical elicitors are nickel, chromium, cobalt, and constituents of bone cement (acrylates und additives such as gentamicin or benzoyl peroxide). After exclusion of the most common differential diagnoses, allergy diagnostic procedures are primarily based on patch tests including a metal and bone cement component series. Additional analysis of periimplant tissue is recommended. However, further studies are necessary to show the significance of the histologic findings and the role of the lymphocyte transformation test (LTT). Which combinations of factors will induce allergic sensitization to implants or trigger periimplant allergic reactions in the case of preexisting cutaneous metal allergy is still unknown. Titanium-based osteosynthesis materials are recommended for metal allergic patients. In elective hip replacements, a ceramic/polyethylene (PE) articulation should be used, and in knee replacements "alternative materials". If a regular, potentially applicable CoCr/PE articulation is preferred, the patient must be well informed and must give his/her written consent.

[Metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing. Development and current state]

Worldwide the employment of surface replacements using metal-on-metal components as an option, particularly for the young and active patient, has gained broad acceptance. Part of the attraction for hip resurfacing is its conservative nature as a prosthetic solution for hip arthritis. It is anatomical, replicating the normal hip and limb length, preserving proximal femoral bone, and is a truly minimally bone invasive approach with excellent outcome of joint function. The purpose of this article is to show the data of 1,000 Conserve(c) Plus hybrid metal-on-metal prostheses in a consecutive study of 1,140 patients with a follow-up of 5.6 years. The current Kaplan and Meier survival estimates of the prosthesis, using any conversion to total hip replacement as the end point, were 98.1% at 3 years [95% confidence interval (CI): 96.8-98.9%], 96.7% at 4 years (95% CI: 94.8-97.8%), and 95.2% at 5 years (95% CI: 93.0-96.8%). The mean postoperative Harris hip score was 93.3. The current state of metal-on-metal surface replacement is positive. The new generation of hip resurfacing has a lot of improvements. The purpose of this review of the procedure is to point out the definite improvements from earlier designs using polyethylene as well as to highlight the overall results and durability achieved by one surgeon's extensive experience and to assess the results from other series and centers. We also want to point out the areas where further investigation is needed.

[Metal-on-metal hip replacement using Metasul cups cemented into Muller reinforcement rings after a mean 5-year (3-8) follow-up: improvement of acetabular fixation by comparing with direct cementation to bone]

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

Early loosening, before a three-year follow-up, has been observed with cemented cups having a metal-on-metal insert in a polyethylene cup. The metal-on-metal bearing has been incriminated as the source of the problem because of its rigidity (particularly for small cups measuring less than 50 mm) and the creation of stress conditions unfavorable for a cemented fixation. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine whether this phenomenon is observed when the cement is fixed not directly into the bone, but via a Muller reinforcement ring.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From 1998 to 2004, 23 arthroplasties using a cemented Metasul cup in a reinforcement ring were implanted in 22 patients (16 women and six men) aged on average 44 years (range 24-56 years). The series included six primary total hip arthroplasties (three for dysplasia, two for protrusions, one for rheumatoid arthritis and one for arthritic degradation) and seventeen revisions (two septic). The Metasul cup (Zimmer-Centerpulse) combined a 28 mm modular head anchored in a femoral implant (two cemented, 21 pressfit) and a polyethylene cup with a Metasul insert (13 of 23 measuring<50mm). In all cases, the cup was fixed with low-viscosity cement in a Myller metal reinforcement ring fixed with screws (Zimmer-Centerpulse). All patients were reviewed clinically and radiographically at a mean 5-year follow-up (range 3-8 years). Acetabular and femoral fixation were analysed (search for lucency and implant migration).

RESULTS

Revision was not necessary in any patient for failure of the acetabular fixation. The mean Postel-Merle-d'Aubigné score improved from 12.9 points (range 7-17) to 17.5 points (range 16-18). The radiographic analysis did not reveal any sign of lucency between the cup and ring, nor any migration of the ring. There was no evidence of femoral osteolysis but one femoral revision was needed due to fracture of the lateral cortical identified six weeks after implantation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Cementing the metal-on-metal cup into a reinforcement ring can avoid the risk of loosening observed after direct cementing into bone. In our study, the large number of small cups (13/23) would have been expected to produce a high rate of acetabular lucent lines and/or a high rate of early revision, as reported by others, as early as 24 months. Our series was also different from others by the use of pressfit femoral implants in most patients, which should reduce the risk of cement debris in the bearing. Longer follow-up will be necessary to confirm the good results observed to date which suggest that direct cementing of the cup into the bone should be incriminated rather than the metal-on-metal bearing to explain the reported failure of cemented Metasul cups.

[Hip resurfacing: current state of knowledge]

SUMMARY

The tribologic quality of metal-on-metal bearings has enabled a second generation of hip resurfacing techniques. Compared with a conventional hip prosthesis, this type of arthroplasty has many advantages: sparing femoral (and acetabular) bone stock, preservation of hip joint biomechanics (femoral offset, leg length), better recovery for high-level sports activities, easier revision, less risk of dislocation, less risk of extension to the shaft in the event of osteolysis. Hip resurfacing can thus be considered as true "minimally invasive bone surgery". There are however specific complications of resurfacing, including femoral neck fracture and collapse of the femoral head. All of the conventional approaches can be used for hip resurfacing procedures, but a precise operative technique is mandatory. The key to success is a proper position of the femoral piece. Certain biomechanical rules for implantation are required in order to limit the cam effect, spare femoral bone, and maintain harmonious loading. Hip resurfacing can be indicated for young and/or active subjects for whom restoration of hip biomechanics offers a real advantage over conventional hip arthroplasty. The mid-term results have been encouraging, both clinically and radiographically.

The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years. An independent prospective review of the first 230 hips

We report an independent prospective review of the first 230 Birmingham hip resurfacings in 212 patients at a mean follow-up of five years (4 to 6). Two patients, one with a loose acetabular component and the other with suspected avascular necrosis of the femoral head, underwent revision. There were two deaths from unrelated causes and one patient was lost to follow-up. The survivorship with the worst-case scenario was 97.8% (95% confidence interval 95.8 to 99.5). The mean Harris hip score improved significantly (paired t-test, p < 0.05) from 62.54 (8 to 92) pre-operatively to 97.7 (61 to 100) at a mean of three years (2.1 to 4.3), then deteriorated slightly to a mean of 95.2 (47 to 100) at a mean of five years. The mean flexion improved from 91.5 degrees (25 degrees to 140 degrees) to 110.4 degrees (80 degrees to 145 degrees) at a mean of three years with no further improvement at five years (111.2 degrees; 70 degrees to 160 degrees). On radiological review at five years, one patient had a progressive lucent line around the acetabular component and six had progressive lucent lines around the femoral component. A total of 18 femoral components (8%) had migrated into varus and those with lucent lines present migrated a mean of 3.8 degrees (1.02 degrees to 6.54 degrees) more than the rest. Superolateral notching of the femoral neck and reactive sclerosis at the tip of the peg of the femoral component were associated with the presence of lucent lines (chi-squared test, p < 0.05), but not with migration of the femoral component, and are of unknown significance. Our results with the Birmingham hip resurfacing continue to be satisfactory at a mean follow-up of five years.

Alumina-on-alumina hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 30 years old

THA in patients younger than 30 years old presents challenges: the initial technical challenge relates to the initial disease that often causes deformities making reconstruction difficult, while the long-term challenge is wear and subsequent osteolysis and component loosening. Ceramic-on-ceramic prostheses may represent a valuable option to reduce wear. We retrospectively studied 101 patients (132 hips) with ceramic-on-ceramic prostheses implanted from 1977 to 2004. As a result of the long span of time, different implant designs and modes of fixation were used. The average age of the patients was 23.4+/-5 years (range, 13-30 years), and the main indication for THA was femoral head necrosis. The minimum followup was 1 year (mean, 6.9 years; range, 1-26.5 years). We documented 17 revisions (13%) for aseptic loosening. Twelve were for isolated acetabular loosening, two for isolated femoral loosening, and three for loosening of both components. Survivorship was 82.1% at 10 years and 72.4% at 15 years. Inferior survivorship was observed for THA performed after secondary arthritis related to slipped capital epiphysis or trauma. Limited osteolysis was observed in one hip. The main limiting factor in this series was the fixation of the acetabular component. However, improvements in the design and in the mode of fixation of this component should enhance long-term results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

THA using metal-on-metal articulation in active patients younger than 50 years

The main concern of patients with longer life expectancies and of patients who are younger and more active is the longevity of their total hip arthroplasty. We retrospectively reviewed 83 cementless total hip arthroplasties in 73 patients implanted with metal-on-metal articulation. All patients were younger than 50 years old (average age, 41 years) at the time of the index procedure, and 80% of the patients had an activity level graded 4 or 5 when measured with the system of Devane et al. A 28-mm Metasul articulation was used with three different cementless titanium acetabular components. At the most recent followup (average, 7.3 years), the average Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score improved from a preoperative 11.1 points to 17.4 points. We observed no radiographic evidence of component loosening. Ten acetabular components had lucency limited to one zone. The 10-year survivorship with the end point of revision (ie, exchange of at least one prosthetic or bearing component) was 100% (95% confidence interval, 90%-100%). Metasul bearings with cementless acetabular components remain promising in this high-risk younger patient population. However, additional followup strategies are recommended to determine any possible long-term deleterious effects associated with the dissemination of metallic ions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Release of chromium from orthopaedic arthroplasties

Many orthopaedic implants are composed of alloys containing chromium. Of particular relevance is the increasing number of Cobalt Chromium bearing arthroplasies being inserted into young patients with osteoarthritis. Such implants will release chromium ions. These patients will be exposed to the released chromium for over 50 years in some cases. The subsequent chromium ion metabolism and redistribution in fluid and tissue compartments is complex. In addition, the potential biological effects of chromium are also controversial, including DNA and chromosomal damage, reduction in CD8 lymphocyte levels and possible hypersensitivity reactions (ALVAL). The establishment of these issues and the measurement of chromium in biological fluids is the subject of this review.

How have alternative bearings (such as metal-on-metal, highly cross-linked polyethylene, and ceramic-on-ceramic) affected the prevention and treatment of osteolysis?

Osteolysis is a multifactorial process dependent on surgical technique, implant design, patient factors, and material composition. Alternative bearing surfaces, such as highly cross-linked polyethylene, ceramic-on-ceramic, and metal-on-metal articular surfaces, have been introduced in an attempt to reduce wear and osteolysis following total hip arthroplasty. Intermediate-term follow-up data available suggest that the prevalence and severity of osteolysis may be reduced with these materials compared with conventional metal-on-polyethylene bearing surface couples. However, long-term data are presently unavailable; the future performance of these bearings awaits clinical validation.

What are the guidelines for the surgical and nonsurgical treatment of periprosthetic osteolysis?

Periprosthetic osteolysis is most often diagnosed by plain radiographs. Because these radiographs routinely underestimate the extent of the lesion, three-dimensional imaging should be used early in the evaluation process to confirm the presenting extent of disease. If the osteolytic process is asymptomatic, scheduled regular follow-up should be instituted until the lesion can be confirmed to be stable or until the decision is made to proceed with surgery. Nonsurgical management with pharmacologic agents has not proved to be effective. If surgery is contemplated, a three-dimensional evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging or helical computed tomography can assist in preoperative planning. Surgical intervention requires complete débridement of the lesional membrane and removal of the wear-generator--with or without component removal and with or without bone grafting, depending on the individual circumstances. A standardized follow-up evaluation mechanism for all patients should be a part of total joint arthroplasty management.

How do alternative bearing surfaces influence wear behavior?

Metal, ceramic, and polyethylene liners represent contemporary bearing choices for total joint replacement. Each has limitations in terms of design, sensitivity to manufacturing, and surgical placement. With polyethylene, larger femoral heads represent a design restriction and a potential wear issue. One side benefit is that polyethylene does not click, squeak, or create stripe wear. The attraction of hard-on-hard bearings (metal-on-metal, ceramic-on-ceramic) is that their typically ultra-low wear alleviates concerns with large femoral head designs. However, hard-on-hard bearings produce stripe wear due to the effects of the rigid liner edge. Slight subluxation (microseparation) during swing phase of gait can result in stripe wear on the ball and liner rim. In addition, high levels of implant wear with vertically placed cups can be anticipated. Currently, only alumina-on-alumina bearings can claim virtually no biologic risk. Thus, the role of laboratory studies is to isolate relevant aspects of performance by cup design and to predict the risk-benefit ratios in patients requiring total hip replacement.

How prevalent are implant wear and osteolysis, and how has the scope of osteolysis changed since 2000?

Although the incidence of failures resulting from wear-related osteolysis and associated severe bone defects are expected to diminish with important advances in polyethylene manufacturing and processing, alternative bearing surfaces, implant design, and revision techniques, current failures still reflect concerns regarding earlier ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene sterilization and degradation. Clinical experience before the year 2000 included rates of wear and osteolysis from 10% to as high as 70% at 7- to 14-year follow-up. With recent advances, early clinical results are encouraging, demonstrating 50% to 81% decreases in radiographic wear rates. These improvements should eventually reduce the burden of future revision hip and knee surgery. However, the long-term in vivo durability of total hip arthroplasties using these alternative materials and bearing couples has not yet been well established, and considerably fewer clinical data are available for other types of joint arthroplasties, such as total knee arthroplasty.

How has the biologic reaction to wear particles changed with newer bearing surfaces?

Orthopaedic surgeons have new tools that address the problem of aseptic loosening and osteolysis, and these tools are now in widespread clinical use. Hard-on-hard bearing couples as well as metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearing couples have lower volumetric wear rates and represent promising solutions to reduce the prevalence of osteolysis and aseptic loosening in total joint arthroplasty. Volumetric wear rates alone, however, do not completely predict the osteolytic potential that is also a function of particle composition, size, morphology, and a number of other particle characteristics. Host factors, including differing innate reactivities to wear products and adaptive immune responses, remain important but incompletely defined. Although the toxicologic significance of local and systemic elevations in metal ions has not been definitively established, monitoring patients with metal-on-metal bearings with serum metal ion levels can be useful to determine the state of the bearing. Furthermore, optimization of these bearing systems to further diminish wear and corrosion would be highly desirable.

Resultados preliminares da artroplastia do quadril metal-metal de superfície: análise dos primeiros 40 casos com seguimento médio de 3 anos

Quarenta quadris (39 pacientes) foram submetidos à artroplastia total metal-metal de superficie "resurfacing" entre 2002 e 2005. Todos foram estudados e analisados clinicamente e radiograficamente. Foram utilizados critérios clínicos, no pré e pós-operatório, pela avaliação de D'Aubigné e Postel. Radiograficamente, as áreas de radiolucência ao redor do acetábulo foram classificadas de acordo com DeLee e Charnley e, no fêmur nas zonas descritas por Amstutz et al. A idade média foi de 54,40 anos. O seguimento mínimo foi de 14 meses e o máximo de 51(média de 37,36 meses). 94,44% dos resultados clínicos foram satisfatórios no pós-operatório. Ocorreram 2 casos de soltura asséptica. Não houve fratura do fêmur durante o seguimento. Os autores consideraram esta opção técnica e de implante satisfatória e, com bons resultados no seguimento médio de 3 anos.

Technical and histologic analysis of a retrieved carbon fiber-reinforced poly-ether-ether-ketone composite alumina-bearing liner 28 months after implantation

A new innovative low-wear bearing for use in total hip arthroplasty, a wear couple consisting of carbon fiber-reinforced poly-ether-ether-ketone (CF-PEEK), has been shown to be highly biocompatible and to have excellent tribological performance in the laboratory. We report the results of our technical and histologic analysis of a CF-PEEK composite acetabular cup component articulating against an alumina-head total hip arthroplasty prosthesis retrieved because of posttrauma infection from a patient in whom the components had been in place for 28 months. Histologic findings showed only a small amount of particles from the composite insert in the patient's periprosthetic tissue. Additional clinical study is necessary to estimate the relevant in vivo wear performance of CF-PEEK liners.