Efficacy of neoadjuvant Cisplatin in triple-negative breast cancer

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved survival compared with adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer only after complete pathologic response

INTRODUCTION

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer that is known to be chemosensitive. In patients with TNBC, we sought to compare survival outcomes between patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with and without complete pathologic response (pCR), and those receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review and identified 385 patients with stage I-III TNBC who were treated with neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy between 2000 and 2008. Patients were divided according to receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with pCR, neoadjuvant chemotherapy without pCR, and adjuvant chemotherapy. Data were compared using Fisher's exact test and analysis of variance (ANOVA). Kaplan-Meier curves were generated.

RESULTS

Of 385 patients, 151 (39%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 234 (61%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty-six (17%) of those patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy had pCR. After controlling for covariates associated with survival in unadjusted tests, patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with residual tumor had significantly worse survival compared with patients receiving adjuvant therapy [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.51, P = 0.007] and a trend towards worse survival compared with patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy with pCR (HR = 0.19, P = 0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Although previous clinical trials have not demonstrated a survival difference between patients receiving neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer, our study suggests an overall survival benefit in patients with pCR following neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with patients receiving adjuvant therapy. It is clear that a prospective study needs to be carried out to better elucidate the timing of chemotherapy in patients with TNBC.

Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly diverse group of cancers, and subtyping is necessary to better identify molecular-based therapies. In this study, we analyzed gene expression (GE) profiles from 21 breast cancer data sets and identified 587 TNBC cases. Cluster analysis identified 6 TNBC subtypes displaying unique GE and ontologies, including 2 basal-like (BL1 and BL2), an immunomodulatory (IM), a mesenchymal (M), a mesenchymal stem-like (MSL), and a luminal androgen receptor (LAR) subtype. Further, GE analysis allowed us to identify TNBC cell line models representative of these subtypes. Predicted "driver" signaling pathways were pharmacologically targeted in these cell line models as proof of concept that analysis of distinct GE signatures can inform therapy selection. BL1 and BL2 subtypes had higher expression of cell cycle and DNA damage response genes, and representative cell lines preferentially responded to cisplatin. M and MSL subtypes were enriched in GE for epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and growth factor pathways and cell models responded to NVP-BEZ235 (a PI3K/mTOR inhibitor) and dasatinib (an abl/src inhibitor). The LAR subtype includes patients with decreased relapse-free survival and was characterized by androgen receptor (AR) signaling. LAR cell lines were uniquely sensitive to bicalutamide (an AR antagonist). These data may be useful in biomarker selection, drug discovery, and clinical trial design that will enable alignment of TNBC patients to appropriate targeted therapies.

An aCGH classifier derived from BRCA1-mutated breast cancer and benefit of high-dose platinum-based chemotherapy in HER2-negative breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer cells deficient for BRCA1 are hypersensitive to agents inducing DNA double-strand breaks (DSB), such as bifunctional alkylators and platinum agents. Earlier, we had developed a comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) classifier based on BRCA1-mutated breast cancers. We hypothesised that this BRCA1-like(CGH) classifier could also detect loss of function of BRCA1 due to other causes besides mutations and, consequently, might predict sensitivity to DSB-inducing agents.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We evaluated this classifier in stage III breast cancer patients, who had been randomly assigned between adjuvant high-dose platinum-based (HD-PB) chemotherapy, a DSB-inducing regimen, and conventional anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Additionally, we assessed BRCA1 loss through mutation or promoter methylation and immunohistochemical basal-like status in the triple-negative subgroup (TN subgroup).

RESULTS

We observed greater benefit from HD-PB chemotherapy versus conventional chemotherapy among patients with BRCA1-like(CGH) tumours [41/230 = 18%, multivariate hazard ratio (HR) = 0.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04-0.43] compared with patients with non-BRCA1-like(CGH) tumours (189/230 = 82%, HR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.50-1.20), with a significant difference (test for interaction P = 0.006). Similar results were obtained for overall survival (P interaction = 0.04) and when analyses were restricted to the TN subgroup. Sixty-three percent (20/32) of assessable BRCA1-like(CGH) tumours harboured either a BRCA1 mutation (n = 8) or BRCA1 methylation (n = 12).

CONCLUSION

BRCA1 loss as assessed by CGH analysis can identify patients with substantially improved outcome after adjuvant DSB-inducing chemotherapy when compared with standard anthracycline-based chemotherapy in our series.

DNA interstrand crosslink repair and cancer

Interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) are highly toxic DNA lesions that prevent transcription and replication by inhibiting DNA strand separation. Agents that induce ICLs were one of the earliest, and are still the most widely used, forms of chemotherapeutic drug. Only recently, however, have we begun to understand how cells repair these lesions. Important insights have come from studies of individuals with Fanconi anaemia (FA), a rare genetic disorder that leads to ICL sensitivity. Understanding how the FA pathway links nucleases, helicases and other DNA-processing enzymes should lead to more targeted uses of ICL-inducing agents in cancer treatment and could provide novel insights into drug resistance.

Triple-negative breast cancer: an unmet medical need

Triple-negative breast cancer, characterized by tumors that do not express estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), or HER-2 genes, represents an important clinical challenge because these cancers do not respond to endocrine therapy or other available targeted agents. The metastatic potential in triple-negative breast cancer is similar to that of other breast cancer subtypes, but these tumors are associated with a shorter median time to relapse and death. One important goal is therefore the identification of prognostic factors and markers to reliably select high and low risk subsets of patients with triple-negative disease for different treatment approaches of subtypes with differential responsiveness to specific agents. However, a reliable prognostic marker has been elusive, and markers have been inconsistently useful. For example, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been studied, but there is still a lack of agreement on a standard assay or cutoff for EGFR expression levels with respect to prognosis. Similarly, because triple-negative status is sometimes used as a surrogate for basal-like breast cancer, specific basal markers have been explored. Indeed, trials designed to accrue patients with basal-like breast cancer using ER/PR and HER-2 negativity may provide only an approximation of the triple-negative population and are sometimes reanalyzed using more specific indicators like CK 5/6, EGFR status, and others, again marred by discordances. Chemotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment of triple-negative breast cancer, but important limitations still need to be overcome in the next few years if any significant clinical strides are to be made. Current treatment strategies for triple-negative disease include anthracyclines, taxanes, ixabepilone, platinum agents, and biologic agents. More recently, EGFR inhibition has been proposed as a therapeutic mechanism in triple-negative breast cancer, again with mixed results. Agents that target poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and androgen receptors have also been proposed in these patients or subsets of them, and ongoing trials should result in definitive guidance with respect to the value of these agents in triple-negative disease. Triple-negative breast cancer is clearly a distinct clinical subtype, from the perspective of both ER and HER-2 expression, but further subclassification is needed. At present, there is not a clear, proven effective single agent that targets a defining vulnerability in triple-negative breast cancer. This article will review the clinical problem of triple-negative disease, potential prognostic factors, demonstrated efficacy of currently available therapeutic options, and new potential therapies.

BRCA1, PARP, and 53BP1: conditional synthetic lethality and synthetic viability

BRCA1 plays a critical role in the regulation of homologous recombination (HR)-mediated DNA double-strand break repair. BRCA1-deficient cancers have evolved to tolerate loss of BRCA1 function. This renders them vulnerable to agents, such as PARP inhibitors, that are conditionally 'synthetic lethal' with their underlying repair defect. Recent studies demonstrate that BRCA1-deficient cells may acquire resistance to these agents by partially correcting their defect in HR-mediated repair, either through reversion mutations in BRCA1 or through 'synthetic viable' loss of 53BP1. These findings and their clinical implications will be reviewed in this article.

Other options in the treatment of advanced breast cancer

Many cytotoxic therapies are available for patients with metastatic breast cancer, but response rates are low and acquired or de novo resistance is virtually universal. Among the agents that are used in the treatment of pretreated metastatic breast cancer are vinorelbine, gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel, pemetrexed, platinum salts (eg, cisplatin, carboplatin), pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, etoposide, and irinotecan. Therapies that improve overall survival in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-resistant metastatic breast cancer are needed.

Triple-negative breast cancer: adjuvant therapeutic options

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), a subtype distinguished by negative immunohistochemical assays for expression of the estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER/PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2(HER2) represents 15% of all breast cancers. Patients with TNBC generally experience a more aggressive clinical course with increased risk of disease progression and poorer overall survival. Furthermore, this subtype accounts for a disproportionate number of disease-related mortality in part due to its aggressive natural history and our lack of effective targeted agents beyond conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy. In this paper, we will review the epidemiology, risk factors, prognosis, and the molecular and clinicopathologic features that distinguish TNBC from other subtypes of breast cancer. In addition, we will examine the available data for the use of cytotoxic chemotherapy in the treatment of TNBC in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting and explore the ongoing development of newer targeted agents.

[Cisplatin or carboplatin, that is the question]

Platine-based chemotherapy agents are major drugs in oncology and are currently used in most solid malignancies. Of these, cisplatin has been the most widely used over past years. Its efficacy and toxicity have been both well documented in the literature. Carboplatin has a rather different toxicity profile and seems to be better tolerated than cisplatin. This might potentially impact on quality of life. Carboplatin has been assessed for treatment of most malignancies in which cisplatin has demonstrated its efficacy. This paper aims at reviewing and comparing the current indications in terms of efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin and carboplatin. Although cisplatin has demonstrated its superiority over carboplatin for treatment of lung cancers and germ-cell tumors, the tolerance of carboplatin is better than that of cisplatin. This might be taken into account for patients treated with non-curative attempt. Further studies should compare both chemotherapy agents for quality of life. Of course, carboplatin remains widely used for patients who are contra-indicated for cisplatin.

Somatic mutations in cancer prognosis and prediction: lessons from TP53 and EGFR genes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We used two examples of genes, TP53 and EGFR, which are somatically altered by intragenic mutations in common cancer types to illustrate how somatic mutations have followed very different routes to clinical applications.

RECENT FINDINGS

TP53 somatic mutations are frequent in many cancers. Their prognostic and predictive values are currently assessed in several clinical trials and TP53 gene therapy is in use in China. Mutations in EGFR have been proved to be predictive of response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors, allowing for the licensing of gefitinib in lung adenocarcinomas carrying a mutated EGFR gene.

SUMMARY

With the accumulation of knowledge on the predictive and prognostic value of somatic mutations, and with recent advances in large-scale sequencing techniques and reduction in cost of sequencing, sequencing several genes in human tumors is on the verge of becoming routine clinical practice.

FZD7 has a critical role in cell proliferation in triple negative breast cancer

Breast cancer is genetically and clinically heterogeneous. Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer that is usually associated with poor outcome and lack of benefit from targeted therapy. We used microarray analysis to perform a pathway analysis of TNBC compared with non-triple negative breast cancer (non-TNBC). Overexpression of several Wnt pathway genes, such as frizzled homolog 7 (FZD7), low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 6 and transcription factor 7 (TCF7) was observed in TNBC, and we directed our focus to the Wnt pathway receptor, FZD7. To validate the function of FZD7, FZD7shRNA was used to knock down FZD7 expression. Notably, reduced cell proliferation and suppressed invasiveness and colony formation were observed in TNBC MDA-MB-231 and BT-20 cells. Study of the possible mechanism indicated that these effects occurred through silencing of the canonical Wnt signaling pathway, as evidenced by loss of nuclear accumulation of β-catenin and decreased transcriptional activity of TCF7. In vivo studies revealed that FZD7shRNA significantly suppressed tumor formation, through reduced cell proliferation, in mice bearing xenografts without FZD7 expression. Our findings suggest that FZD7-involved canonical Wnt signaling pathway is essential for tumorigenesis of TNBC, and thus, FZD7 shows promise as a biomarker and a potential therapeutic target for TNBC.

Multiple biomarker expression on circulating tumor cells in comparison to tumor tissues from primary and metastatic sites in patients with locally advanced/inflammatory, and stage IV breast cancer, using a novel detection technology

Patients with locally advanced/inflammatory breast cancer (LABC/IBC) face a high likelyhood of recurrence and prognosis for relapsed, or de novo stage IV metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains poor. Estrogen (ER) and HER2 receptor expression on primary or MBC allow targeted therapies, but an estimated 10-18% of tumors do not exhibit these biomarkers and survival in these cases is even poorer. Variations in discordance rates for the expression of ER and HER2 receptors have been observed between primary and metastatic tumors and such discordances may lead to suboptimal treatment. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are considered the seeds of residual disease and distant metastases and their characterization could help guide treatment selection. To explore this possibility, we used multiple biomarker assessment of CTCs in comparison to primary and metastatic tumor sites. Thirty-six patients with LABC/IBC, or stage IV MBC were evaluated. Blood samples were procured prior to initiating or changing therapy. CTCs were identified based on presence of cytokeratin and nucleus staining, and the absence of CD45. A multimarker assay was developed to simultaneously quantify expression of HER2, ER, and ERCC1, a DNA excision repair protein. Novel fiber-optic array scanning technology (FAST) was used for sensitive location of CTCs. CTCs were detected in 82% of MBC and 62% LABC/IBC cases. Multiplex marker expression was successfully carried out in samples from18 patients with MBC and in 8 patients with LABC/IBC that contained CTCs. In MBC, we detected actionable discordance rates of 40 and 23%, respectively for ER and HER2 where a biomarker was negative in the primary or metastatic tumor and positive in the CTCs. In LABC/IBC, actionable discordances were 60 and 20% for ER and HER2, respectively. Pilot trials evaluating the effectiveness of treatment selections based on actionable discordances between biomarker expression patterns on CTCs and primary or metastatic tumor sites may allow for a prospective assessment of CTC-based individualized targeted therapies.

Specific kinesin expression profiles associated with taxane resistance in basal-like breast cancer

Breast cancer is a genetically heterogenous disease with subtypes differing in prognosis and chemosensitivity. The basal-like breast cancer (BLBC) molecular subtype is associated with poorer outcomes, but is more responsive to taxane-based chemotherapy. Kinesins are intracellular transport proteins that interact with microtubules, which are also the mechanistic target for taxanes. We investigated the relationship between taxane resistance in BLBC and kinesins using both expression and functional studies. Kinesin (KIF) expression was evaluated in three settings in relation to taxane resistance: (i) the NCI-60 cancer cell lines, (ii) pre-treatment samples from four BLBC patient cohorts receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens with and without taxanes, and (iii) post-treatment samples from residual breast cancer following neoadjuvant taxane-containing chemotherapy. We used a novel functional approach to gene modification, validation-based insertional mutagenesis, to select kinesin-overexpressing clones of BLBC cells for evaluation of related mechanisms of taxane resistance. In the NCI-60 cell line dataset, overexpression of the kinesin KIFC3 is significantly correlated with resistance to both docetaxel (P < 0.001) and paclitaxel (P < 0.001), but not to platinum-based chemotherapy, including carboplatin (P = 0.49) and cisplatin (P = 0.10). Overexpression of KIFC3 and KIF5A in pre-chemotherapy samples similarly predicted resistance to paclitaxel in the MDACC cohorts (P = 0.01); no KIF predicted resistance to fluorouracil-epirubicin-cyclophosphamide or cisplatin in BLBC patient cohorts treated without taxanes. KIF12 is the most overexpressed KIF gene in post-chemotherapy taxane-resistant residual breast cancers (2.8-fold-change). Functional studies established that overexpression of KIFC3, KIF5A, and KIF12 were specific in mediating resistance to docetaxel and not vincristine or doxorubicin. Mutation of the ATP-binding domain of a kinesin abolished its ability to mediate docetaxel resistance. Overall, kinesin overexpression correlates with specific taxane resistance in BLBC cell lines and tissues. Our results suggest a novel approach for drug development to overcome taxane resistance in breast cancer through concurrent or sequential use of kinesin inhibitors.

Inherited mutations in breast cancer genes--risk and response

Germ-line mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 confer a high risk of developing breast cancer. They account, however, for only 40% of strongly familial breast cancer cases. Intensive genome-wide searches for other highly-penetrant BRCA genes that, individually account for a sizeable fraction of the remaining heritability has not identified any plausible candidates. The "missing heritability" is thought to be due to cumulative effects of susceptibility alleles associated with low to moderate penetrance, in accordance with a polygenic model of inheritance. In addition, a large number of individually very rare, highly penetrant variants could account for part of the gap. Meanwhile, an understanding of the function of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the DNA damage response pathway has lead to the identification of a number of breast cancer susceptibility genes including PALB2, CHEK2, ATM and BRIP1, all of which interact directly or indirectly with BRCA1 or BRCA2. Knowledge of how BRCA1 and BRCA2 maintain genomic integrity has also led the development of novel targeted therapies. Here we summarize the recent advances made in the understanding of the functions of these two genes, as well as the risks and responses associated with mutations in these and other breast cancer susceptibility genes.

Clinical management of hereditary breast cancer syndromes

Over the past 15 years there has been substantial improvement in the understanding of hereditary breast cancer. Germline genetic testing for mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, PTEN and TP53 allows for the identification of individuals at increased risk for breast, ovarian and other cancers. Advances in screening, prevention and treatment have led to improved clinical management which is best defined for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. The addition of screening techniques such as breast magnetic resonance imaging has been shown to lead to earlier detection. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy leads to a reduction in the risk of both ovarian cancer and breast cancer and also is associated with an improvement in overall survival. BRCA1/2 mutation status may be applicable to systemic therapy decisions. Preclinical and early clinical research suggests that specific classes of chemotherapy may be more effective in mutation carriers. Finally, PARP inhibitors represent a novel therapeutic strategy that exploits the weaknesses of BRCA1/2-associated malignancies.

Studying therapy response and resistance in mouse models for BRCA1-deficient breast cancer

Worldwide, more than one million women are diagnosed with breast cancer every year, making it the most common malignancy of females in the developed world. Germline mutations in the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 account for 4-6% of all breast cancer cases, and mutation carriers have a lifetime risk of 80% for developing breast cancer and 40% for developing ovarian cancer. Current treatment options are limited and often do not lead to cure. In the 17 years since the discovery of BRCA1, the generation of mouse models for BRCA1 deficiency has greatly aided our understanding of it's role in tumorigenesis. In contrast to human BRCA1 mutation carriers, mice carrying heterozygous mutations in Brca1 did not develop spontaneous tumors. This led to the generation of conditional mouse models in which tissue-specific Brca1 deletion induces formation of mammary tumors that closely resemble human BRCA1-mutated breast tumors. These models have proven useful for studying BRCA1-related tumor development, drug response and resistance. BRCA1-deficient cancer cells are defective in DNA repair mediated by homologous recombination (HR) and therefore highly sensitive to DNA-damaging agents such as platinum drugs and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. However, BRCA1-mutated tumors can develop resistance to these drugs; hence improved treatment strategies are critical. Existing mouse models have already proven useful for preclinical testing of (combinations of) therapeutic agents that may be beneficial for the treatment of patients with BRCA1-mutated tumors. In this review, we discuss the progress made towards modeling BRCA1-deficient breast cancer in mice and what we have learned from preclinical studies using these models.

The role of p63 in cancer, stem cells and cancer stem cells

The transcription factor p63 has important functions in tumorigenesis, epidermal differentiation and stem cell self-renewal. The TP63 gene encodes multiple protein isoforms that have different or even antagonistic roles in these processes. The balance of p63 isoforms, together with the presence or absence of the other p53 family members, p73 and p53, has a striking biological impact. There is increasing evidence that interactions between p53-family members, whether cooperative or antagonistic, are involved in various cell processes. This review summarizes the current understanding of the role of p63 in tumorigenesis, metastasis, cell migration and senescence. In particular, recent data indicate important roles in adult stem cell and cancer stem cell regulation and in the response of cancer cells to therapy.

Triple-negative breast cancer: epidemiology and management options

The triple receptor-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype is characterized by the lack of expression of both hormone receptors as well as lack of over-expression and/or lack of gene amplification of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Approximately 10-15% of breast carcinomas are known to be of the TNBC subtype, which constitutes approximately 80% of all 'basal-like tumours'. Risk factors for TNBC include young age at breast cancer diagnosis, young age at menarche, high parity, lack of breast feeding, high body mass index and African American ethnicity. The majority of BRCA1 tumours are TNBC. TNBC has a worse prognosis and tends to relapse early compared with other subtypes of breast cancer. Conversely, it displays increased chemosensitivity compared with other breast tumour subtypes. Several agents are currently being investigated as potential therapeutic agents for the treatment of women with TNBC including agents targeted against EGFR, anti-angiogenic agents, multityrosine kinase inhibitors and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. This review focuses on the epidemiology of TNBC, its pathological features, natural history and recurrence patterns as well as current and future management options.

The expression of ERCC1, RRM1, and BRCA1 in breast cancer according to the immunohistochemical phenotypes

We studied the expression of BRCA1, ERCC1, and RRM1 which play an important role in DNA repair systems in breast cancer. Immunohistochemical staining for EGFR, BRCA1, ERCC1, and RRM1 were performed by using a tissue microarray made from 230 breast cancer patients. Patients were classified into luminal A, luminal B, HER-2, and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) types according to ER, PR, and HER-2 expression. The expression of ERCC1, RRM1, and BRCA1 were correlated (P < 0.05). The expression level of ERCC1 was the lowest in TNBC type (P = 0.031), ERCC1 negativity was more prominent in TNBC and luminal B groups than luminal A and HER-2 groups (P = 0.013). Cases with EGFR overexpression showed high expression of RRM1 and BRCA1 (P = 0.046, and 0.004, respectively). In conclusion, the expression of ERCC1 is particularly lower in TNBCs than other types of breast cancers.

Efficacy of a leptin receptor antagonist peptide in a mouse model of triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancers, which represent 10-20% of all mammary tumours, are characterised by the aggressive phenotype, are often found in younger women and have been associated with poor prognosis. Obesity increases the risk for triple-negative breast cancer development. Because triple-negative breast cancer patients are unresponsive to current targeted therapies and other treatment options are only partially effective, new pharmacological modalities are urgently needed. Here we examined if the leptin (obesity hormone) receptor is a viable target for the treatment of this cancer subtype. In human triple-negative breast cancer tissues, the leptin receptor was expressed in 92% (64/69) and leptin in 86% (59/69) of cases. In a model triple-negative breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231, the leptin receptor antagonist peptide Allo-aca inhibited leptin-induced proliferation at 50 pM concentration. In an MDA-MB-231 orthotopic mouse xenograft model, Allo-aca administered subcutaneously significantly extended the average survival time from 15.4 days (untreated controls) to 24 and 28.1 days at 0.1 and 1mg/kg/day doses, respectively. In parallel, conventional treatment with 1mg/kg/day intraperitoneal cisplatin prolonged the average survival time to 18.6 days, while administration of 20mg/kg/day oral Tamoxifen (negative control) had no significant survival effects relative to controls. In normal CD-1 mice, Allo-aca produced no systemic toxicity up to the highest studied subcutaneous bolus dose of 50mg/kg, while, as expected, it induced a modest 6-10% body weight increase. Our results indicate that leptin receptor antagonists could become attractive options for triple-negative breast cancer treatment, especially in the obese patient population.

Current strategy for triple-negative breast cancer: appropriate combination of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) often grows rapidly and has poor outcomes, with a high recurrence rate and a short interval between recurrence and death. New molecular-targeted therapies are being developed, but cannot be used at present. Other strategies for the management of TNBC are needed. TNBC is characterized by an expanding growth pattern without extensive intraductal spread and is a good candidate for breast-conserving therapy (BCT) with sufficient margins. The local recurrence rate after BCT is not high as those of other subtypes of breast cancer. In contrast, the regional recurrence rate is higher in TNBC than in other subtypes. Sentinel node biopsy and axillary resection should therefore be performed with the upmost caution. Radiation therapy has been shown to be useful for the management of TNBC. Radiation therapy of the chest wall after mastectomy and the regional area as well as the breast after breast-conserving surgery should be considered. Chemotherapy is the only systemic treatment available for TNBC. In our hospital, a combination of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and 5-fluorouracil (FEC) followed by docetaxel (DTX) or DTX followed by FEC has been used to treat tumors more than 2 cm in diameter or node-positive breast cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with these regimens has produced pathological complete response (pCR) rates higher than 20% in patients with TNBC, regardless of the specific order of agents. Tumors tend to shrink towards their center and can be a good indication for BCT. After 3 years, a pCR is associated with good outcomes, whereas a non-pCR sometimes results in distant recurrence, even when residual tumor is minimal. Patients should be closely observed during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. If there is any evidence of tumor progression, the chemotherapeutic regimen should be modified or surgery performed, without losing the opportunity to administer potentially effective treatment. Several studies indicate that neoadjuvant chemotherapy with platinum-based regimens is effective for TNBC and is thus an important treatment option. We have used regimens combining epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) to treat tumors 1-2 cm in diameter without node metastasis, and 2 of 21 patients presented with distant metastases (disease-free interval, 2 and 5 years). We have not used systemic therapy to treat tumors 1 cm or less in diameter without node metastasis, and all 8 patients are alive without recurrence for more than 4 years. After distant recurrence in patients with TNBC, the same chemotherapeutic agents as those used for other subtypes of breast cancer are recommended, but the response is often disappointing, leading to poor outcomes. TNBC presents with different clinical features from other subtypes. The treatment strategy should be selected according to the characteristics of the specific subtype of breast cancer.

Minireview: Basal-like breast cancer: from molecular profiles to targeted therapies

The classification of breast cancer into molecular subtypes with distinctive gene expression signatures that predict treatment response and prognosis has ushered in a new era of personalized medicine for this remarkably heterogeneous and deadly disease. Basal-like breast cancer (BLBC) is a particularly aggressive molecular subtype defined by a robust cluster of genes expressed by epithelial cells in the basal or outer layer of the adult mammary gland. BLBC is a major clinical challenge because these tumors are prevalent in young woman, often relapsing rapidly. Additionally, most (but not all) basal-like tumors lack expression of steroid hormone receptors (estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, limiting targeted therapeutic options for these predominantly triple-negative breast cancers. This minireview will focus on new insights into the molecular etiology of these poor-prognosis tumors that underlie their intrinsic genomic instability, deregulated cell proliferation and apoptosis, and invasive tumor biology. We will also review ongoing efforts to translate these fundamental insights into improved therapies for women with BLBC.

Paradoxical relationship between chromosomal instability and survival outcome in cancer

Chromosomal instability (CIN) is associated with poor prognosis in human cancer. However, in certain animal tumor models elevated CIN negatively impacts upon organism fitness, and is poorly tolerated by cancer cells. To better understand this seemingly contradictory relationship between CIN and cancer cell biological fitness and its relationship with clinical outcome, we applied the CIN70 expression signature, which correlates with DNA-based measures of structural chromosomal complexity and numerical CIN in vivo, to gene expression profiles of 2,125 breast tumors from 13 published cohorts. Tumors with extreme CIN, defined as the highest quartile CIN70 score, were predominantly of the estrogen receptor negative (ER(-)), basal-like phenotype and displayed the highest chromosomal structural complexity and chromosomal numerical instability. We found that the extreme CIN/ER(-) tumors were associated with improved prognosis relative to tumors with intermediate CIN70 scores in the third quartile. We also observed this paradoxical relationship between CIN and prognosis in ovarian, gastric, and non-small cell lung cancer, with poorest outcome in tumors with intermediate, rather than extreme, CIN70 scores. These results suggest a nonmonotonic relationship between gene signature expression and HR for survival outcome, which may explain the difficulties encountered in the identification of prognostic expression signatures in ER(-) breast cancer. Furthermore, the data are consistent with the intolerance of excessive CIN in carcinomas and provide a plausible strategy to define distinct prognostic patient cohorts with ER(-) breast cancer. Inclusion of a surrogate measurement of CIN may improve cancer risk stratification and future therapeutic approaches.

Gene signatures of breast cancer progression and metastasis

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Patient outcome varies significantly, depending on prognostic features of patients and their tumors, including patient age, menopausal status, tumor size and histology, nodal status, and so on. Response to treatment also depends on a series of predictive factors, such as hormone receptor and HER2 status. Current treatment guidelines use these features to determine treatment. However, these guidelines are imperfect, and do not always predict response to treatment or survival. Evolving technologies are permitting increasingly large amounts of molecular data to be obtained from tumors, which may enable more personalized treatment decisions to be made. The challenge is to learn what information leads to improved prognostic accuracy and treatment outcome for individual patients.

Triple negative breast cancer: unmet medical needs

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive clinical phenotype characterized by lack of expression (or minimal expression) of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) as well as an absence of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) overexpression. It shows substantial overlap with basal-type and BRCA1-related breast cancers, both of which also have aggressive clinical courses. However, this overlap is not complete, and the expression of ER, PR, and HER2 has been noted in basal-like tumors. TNBC also includes the normal-like subtype, and not all patients with TNBC harbor BRCA1 mutations. Because of its expression profile, TNBC is not amenable to treatment with hormone therapy or the anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody trastuzumab, and systemic treatment options are currently limited to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Overall survival, whether in early-stage or advanced disease, is poor compared with that in patients who have other phenotypes. A number of targeted approaches to TNBC are undergoing clinical evaluation, including the use of agents with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitory properties such as iniparib (the United States Adopted Name for the investigational agent BSI-201), olaparib (AZD2281), and veliparib (ABT-888), antiangiogenic agents such as bevacizumab and sunitinib, and epidermal growth factor receptor blockers such as cetuximab and erlotinib. Encouraging results with some of these agents have been reported, thereby offering the promise for improved outcomes in patients with TNBC. The clinical characteristics of TNBC and clinical experience to date with novel targeted agents under development for this aggressive phenotype is reviewed.

BRCA1-mutated and basal-like breast cancers have similar aCGH profiles and a high incidence of protein truncating TP53 mutations

BACKGROUND

Basal-like breast cancers (BLBC) are aggressive breast cancers for which, so far, no targeted therapy is available because they typically lack expression of hormone receptors and HER2. Phenotypic features of BLBCs, such as clinical presentation and early age of onset, resemble those of breast tumors from BRCA1-mutation carriers. The genomic instability of BRCA1-mutated tumors can be effectively targeted with DNA-damaging agents and poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) inhibitors. Molecular similarities between BLBCs and BRCA1-mutated tumors may therefore provide predictive markers for therapeutic response of BLBCs.

METHODS

There are several known molecular features characteristic for BRCA1-mutated breast tumors: 1) increased numbers of genomic aberrations, 2) a distinct pattern of genomic aberrations, 3) a high frequency of TP53 mutations and 4) a high incidence of complex, protein-truncating TP53 mutations. We compared the frequency of TP53 mutations and the pattern and amount of genomic aberrations between BRCA1-mutated breast tumors, BLBCs and luminal breast tumors by TP53 gene sequencing and array-based comparative genomics hybridization (aCGH) analysis.

RESULTS

We found that the high incidence of protein truncating TP53 mutations and the pattern and amount of genomic aberrations specific for BRCA1-mutated breast tumors are also characteristic for BLBCs and different from luminal breast tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Complex, protein truncating TP53 mutations in BRCA1-mutated tumors may be a direct consequence of genomic instability caused by BRCA1 loss, therefore, the presence of these types of TP53 mutations in sporadic BLBCs might be a hallmark of BRCAness and a potential biomarker for sensitivity to PARP inhibition. Also, our data suggest that a small subset of genomic regions may be used to identify BRCA1-like BLBCs. BLBCs share molecular features that were previously found to be specific for BRCA1-mutated breast tumors. These features might be useful for the identification of tumors with increased sensitivity to (high-dose or dose-dense) alkylating agents and PARP inhibitors.

Poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors: science and current clinical development

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors are a promising new area in cancer therapeutics. This review summarizes the current understanding of their mechanism of action, their state of clinical development, and possible mechanisms of resistance.

RECENT FINDINGS

Poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors were predicted to cause lethality in cells with lesions in homologous recombination, as well as to be synergistic with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Recent clinical trial results have validated both of these hypotheses. In addition, studies have begun to examine possible mechanisms of resistance.

SUMMARY

Poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors were developed with the idea of synthetic lethality in mind, a concept from classical genetics that may be a general approach to finding new targets for cancer therapy. They show activity as monotherapy in cancers with defective homologous recombination, and they may potentiate the action of conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 mRNA expression in human breast cancer: a meta-analysis

Although poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP1) inhibition is a recent promising therapy in breast cancer, PARP1 expression in this disease is not known. Using DNA microarray and array-based comparative genomic hybridization (arrayCGH), we examined PARP1 mRNA expression and copy number alterations in 326 invasive breast cancer samples and normal breast (NB) samples. A meta-analysis was performed on a large public retrospective gene expression data set (n = 2,485) to analyze correlation between PARP1 mRNA expression and molecular subtypes and clinico-pathological parameters. PARP1 was overexpressed in 58% of cancers, and its expression was heterogeneous between tumors. ArrayCGH data revealed an association between mRNA overexpression and gain/amplification at the PARP1 locus (P < 1.0E-8). Meta-analysis showed that PARP1 expression was higher in basal breast cancers (P < 1.0E-72), but overexpression was also found in other subtypes. PARP1 expression correlated with high grade, medullary histological type, tumor size, and worse metastasis-free survival (MFS; HR = 1.12 [1.04-1.22], P = 0.004) and overall survival (OS; HR = 1.16 [1.04-1.29], P = 0.006). In multivariate analysis, PARP1 expression had an independent prognostic value for MFS, which was restricted to patients untreated with any adjuvant chemotherapy. These data demonstrate overexpression of PARP1 in a large number of breast cancers and support the development of PARP inhibitors in basal subtype, but also potentially in other breast cancer subtypes.

Triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer, so called because it lacks expression of the estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2, is often, but not always, a basal-like breast cancer. This review focuses on its origin, molecular and clinical characteristics, and treatment.

The genesis and evolution of high-grade serous ovarian cancer

Germline mutation in either BRCA1 or BRCA2 is associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer, particularly the most common invasive histotype - serous carcinoma. In addition, serous ovarian cancers have an unusually high frequency of other molecular events involving BRCA pathway dysfunction. Recent findings show a high frequency of TP53 mutation, chromosomal instability, distinct molecular subtypes and DNA copy number-driven changes in gene expression. These findings suggest a model in which homologous recombination repair deficiency initiates a cascade of molecular events that sculpt the evolution of high-grade serous ovarian cancer and dictate its response to therapy.

Novel treatment approaches for triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancers share an aggressive biology, marked by increased recurrence risk and poorer survival compared with hormone receptor-positive subtypes. Few therapeutic trials have specifically focused on triple-negative breast cancer, and the treatment of patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer has changed little in the past decade. Over this time, however, attention has shifted to treatment approaches based on molecular subtypes of breast cancer, and investigation into the mechanistic underpinnings of these distinct subtypes has exploded. Converging preclinical rationales combined with early provocative clinical efficacy has focused recent attention on strategies targeting DNA repair defects for the treatment of patients with triple-negative and BRCA mutation-associated breast cancers. These developments are very promising and suggest that major advances in the targeted treatment of patients with triple-negative breast cancer are in sight. This review provides an overview of the clinical features of triple-negative breast cancer and current treatment strategies in the adjuvant setting. Mechanisms of DNA repair and the DNA damage response are reviewed to provide background for understanding novel approaches targeting DNA repair defects in this disease with DNA-damaging chemotherapeutic agents and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. Ongoing studies, including those investigating the role of antiangiogenic therapies, are also reviewed.

Treatment options for patients with triple-negative breast cancer

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease composed of different subtypes, characterized by their different clinicopathological characteristics, prognoses and responses to treatment. In the past decade, significant advances have been made in the treatment of breast cancer sensitive to hormonal treatments, as well as in patients whose malignant cells overexpress or amplify HER2. In contrast, mainly due to the lack of molecular targets, little progress has been made in the treatment of patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Recent improved understanding of the natural history, pathophysiology, and molecular features of triple-negative breast cancers have provided new insights into management and therapeutic strategies for women affected with this entity. Ongoing and planned translational clinical trials are likely to optimize and improve treatment of women with this disease.

Somatic structural rearrangements in genetically engineered mouse mammary tumors

Background

Here we present the first paired-end sequencing of tumors from genetically engineered mouse models of cancer to determine how faithfully these models recapitulate the landscape of somatic rearrangements found in human tumors. These were models of Trp53-mutated breast cancer, Brca1- and Brca2-associated hereditary breast cancer, and E-cadherin (Cdh1) mutated lobular breast cancer.

Results

We show that although Brca1- and Brca2-deficient mouse mammary tumors have a defect in the homologous recombination pathway, there is no apparent difference in the type or frequency of somatic rearrangements found in these cancers when compared to other mouse mammary cancers, and tumors from all genetic backgrounds showed evidence of microhomology-mediated repair and non-homologous end-joining processes. Importantly, mouse mammary tumors were found to carry fewer structural rearrangements than human mammary cancers and expressed in-frame fusion genes. Like the fusion genes found in human mammary tumors, these were not recurrent. One mouse tumor was found to contain an internal deletion of exons of the Lrp1b gene, which led to a smaller in-frame transcript. We found internal in-frame deletions in the human ortholog of this gene in a significant number (4.2%) of human cancer cell lines.

Conclusions

Paired-end sequencing of mouse mammary tumors revealed that they display significant heterogeneity in their profiles of somatic rearrangement but, importantly, fewer rearrangements than cognate human mammary tumors, probably because these cancers have been induced by strong driver mutations engineered into the mouse genome. Both human and mouse mammary cancers carry expressed fusion genes and conserved homozygous deletions.

Indicators of homologous recombination deficiency in breast cancer and association with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Tumors with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), such as BRCA1-associated breast cancers, are not able to reliably repair DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and are therefore highly sensitive to both DSB-inducing chemotherapy and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. We have studied markers that may indicate the presence of HRD in HER2-negative breast cancers and related them to neoadjuvant chemotherapy response.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), BRCA1 promoter methylation, BRCA1 messenger RNA (mRNA) expression and EMSY amplification were assessed in 163 HER2-negative pretreatment biopsies from patients scheduled for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Features of BRCA1 dysfunction were frequent in triple-negative (TN) tumors: a BRCA1-like aCGH pattern, promoter methylation and reduced mRNA expression were observed in, respectively, 57%, 25% and 36% of the TN tumors. In ER+ tumors, a BRCA2-like aCGH pattern and the amplification of the BRCA2 inhibiting gene EMSY were frequently observed (43% and 13%, respectively) and this BRCA2-like profile was associated with a better response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Abnormalities associated with BRCA1 inactivation are present in about half of the TN breast cancers but were not predictive of chemotherapy response. In ER+/HER2- tumors, a BRCA2-like aCGH pattern was predictive of chemotherapy response. These findings should be confirmed in independent series.

Identification of the YES1 Kinase as a Therapeutic Target in Basal-Like Breast Cancers

Normal cellular behavior can be described as a complex, regulated network of interaction between genes and proteins. Targeted cancer therapies aim to neutralize specific proteins that are necessary for the cancer cell to remain viable in vivo. Ideally, the proteins targeted should be such that their downregulation has a major impact on the survival/fitness of the tumor cells and, at the same time, has a smaller effect on normal cells. It is difficult to use standard analysis methods on gene or protein expression levels to identify these targets because the level thresholds for tumorigenic behavior are different for different genes/proteins. We have developed a novel methodology to identify therapeutic targets by using a new paradigm called "gene centrality." The main idea is that, in addition to being overexpressed, good therapeutic targets should have a high degree of connectivity in the tumor network because one expects that suppression of its expression would affect many other genes. We propose a mathematical quantity called "centrality," which measures the degree of connectivity of genes in a network in which each edge is weighted by the expression level of the target gene. Using our method, we found that several SRC proto-oncogenes LYN, YES1, HCK, FYN, and LCK have high centrality in identifiable subsets of basal-like and HER2+ breast cancers. To experimentally validate the clinical value of this finding, we evaluated the effect of YES1 knockdown in basal-like breast cancer cell lines that overexpress this gene. We found that YES1 downregulation has a significant effect on the survival of these cell lines. Our results identify YES1 as a target for therapeutics in a subset of basal-like breast cancers.

The RING heterodimer BRCA1-BARD1 is a ubiquitin ligase inactivated by the platinum-based anticancer drugs

The breast cancer susceptibility protein 1 (BRCA1) participates in the maintenance of cells genomic integrity through DNA repair, cell cycle checkpoint, protein ubiquitination, and transcriptional regulation. The N-terminus of BRCA1 contains a RING domain that preferentially forms a heterodimeric complex with BARD1. The BRCA1-BARD1 RING complex has an E3 ubiquitin ligase activity that plays an essential role in response to DNA damage. Preclinical and clinical studies have recently revealed that structural changes to the heterodimer result in alterations to the BRCA1-mediated DNA repair pathways in cancer cells, and lead to hypersensitivity to several chemotherapeutic agents. It is of interest to approach the BRCA1 RING domain as a potentially molecular target for platinum-based drugs for cancer therapy. A previous study has shown that the anticancer drug cisplatin formed intramolecular and intermolecular BRCA1 adducts in which His117 was the primary platinum-binding site, and conferred conformational changes and induced thermostability. Here, we have studied the functional consequence of the in vitro platination of the BRCA1 RING domain by a number of platinum complexes. The BRCA1 ubiquitin ligase activity was inhibited by transplatin > cisplatin > oxaliplatin > carboplatin in that order. The consequences of the binding of the platinum complexes on the reactivity of the BRCA1 were also discussed. The data raised the possibility of selectively targeting the BRCA1 DNA repair for cancer therapy.

Triple-negative breast cancer: disease entity or title of convenience?

This Review outlines the understanding and management of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). TNBC shares morphological and genetic abnormalities with basal-like breast cancer (BLBC), a subgroup of breast cancer defined by gene-expression profiling. However, TNBC and BLBC tumors are heterogeneous and overlap is incomplete. Breast cancers found in BRCA1 mutation carriers are also frequently triple negative and basal like. TNBC and BLBC occur most frequently in young women, especially African Americans, and tend to exhibit aggressive, metastatic behavior. These tumors respond to conventional chemotherapy but relapse more frequently than hormone receptor-positive, luminal subtypes and have a worse prognosis. New systemic therapies are urgently needed as most patients with TNBC and/or BLBC relapse with distant metastases, and hormonal therapies and HER2-targeted agents are ineffective in this group of tumors. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, angiogenesis inhibitors, EGFR-targeted agents, and src kinase and mTOR inhibitors are among the therapeutic agents being actively investigated in clinical trials in patients with TNBC and/or BRCA1-associated tumors. Increased understanding of the genetic abnormalities involved in the pathogenesis of TNBC, BLBC and BRCA1-associated tumors is opening up new therapeutic possibilities for these hard-to-treat breast cancers.

Triple-negative, basal-like, and quintuple-negative breast cancers: better prediction model for survival

Background

Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) and basal-like breast cancers (BLBCs) are known as poor outcome subtypes with a lack of targeted therapy. Previous studies have shown conflicting results regarding the difference of prognostic significance between TNBCs and BLBCs. In this study, we aimed to characterize the prognostic features of TNBCs, in view of BLBCs and quintuple-negative breast cancers (QNBC/5NPs).

Methods

Using tissue microarray-based immunohistochemical analysis, we categorized 951 primary breast cancers into four or five subtypes according to the expression of ER, PR, HER2, and basal markers (CK5/6, EGFR).

Results

The results of this study showed that both TNBCs and BLBCs were associated with high histological and/or nuclear grades. When the TNBCs are divided into two subtypes by the presence of basal markers, the clinicopathologic characteristics of TNBCs were mainly maintained in the BLBCs. The 5-subgrouping was the better prediction model for both disease free and overall survival in breast cancers than the 4-subgrouping. After multivariate analysis of TNBCs, the BLBCs did not have a worse prognosis than the QNBC/5NPs. Interestingly, the patients with BLBCs showed significant adjuvant chemotherapy benefit. In addition, QNBC/5NPs comprised about 6~8% of breast cancers in publicly available breast cancer datasets

Conclusion

The QNBC/5NP subtype is a worse prognostic subgroup of TNBCs, especially in higher stage and this result may be related to adjuvant chemotherapy benefit of BLBCs, calling for caution in the identification of subgroups of patients for therapeutic classification.