851
|
Sreeraman Kumar R, Thapa R, Kim Y, Khushalani NI, Sondak VK, Reed DR. Higher than reported adolescent and young adult clinical trial enrollment during the "Golden Age" of melanoma clinical trials. Cancer Med 2018; 7:991-996. [PMID: 29478277 PMCID: PMC5911596 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2017] [Revised: 11/28/2017] [Accepted: 11/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Clinical trial enrollments in adolescents and young adults (AYA) with cancer have historically been lower than those in pediatric and older adult populations. We sought to examine therapeutic trial enrollment rates at our cancer center. We performed a retrospective evaluation of AYA patients treated before and after the first checkpoint inhibitor trial opened at our cancer center in 2007. We examined gender, stage at presentation and insurance status in terms of trial enrollment. We compared the trial participation rate of AYA patients with that of older adults. In this adult facility, 12.7% (1,831) of total patients were between age 15 and 39. Overall therapeutic clinical trial rate was 17.6% which increased to 19.8% since 2007. Both nodal disease or metastatic disease at presentation was associated with increasing odds of trial enrollment (OR = 5.36 and P < 0.001 for nodal disease and OR = 7.96 and P < 0.001 for metastatic disease). There was a nonstatistically significant trend toward improved 3-year overall survival in the AYA patients with advanced presentation that enrolled on clinical trials compared with those not enrolled on trials since 2007. AYA clinical trial enrollment at a comprehensive care center melanoma program was higher than reported in the literature overall for AYA patients. This 1,831 patient cohort may provide a foundation for more detailed investigation toward quantifying the effects of clinical trial enrollment in terms of age-specific benefits and toxicities for AYA patients with malignancies that have their peak incidence in older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ram Thapa
- Department of Biostatistics and BioinformaticsMoffitt Cancer CenterTampaFlorida33612
| | - Youngchul Kim
- Department of Biostatistics and BioinformaticsMoffitt Cancer CenterTampaFlorida33612
| | | | - Vernon K. Sondak
- Department of Cutaneous OncologyMoffitt Cancer CenterTampaFlorida33612
| | - Damon R. Reed
- Adolescent and Young Adult ProgramMoffitt Cancer CenterTampaFlorida33612
- Sarcoma DepartmentMoffitt Cancer CenterTampa, Florida33612
- Chemical Biology and Molecular Medicine ProgramMoffitt Cancer CenterTampaFlorida33612
| |
Collapse
|
852
|
Maio M, Lewis K, Demidov L, Mandalà M, Bondarenko I, Ascierto PA, Herbert C, Mackiewicz A, Rutkowski P, Guminski A, Goodman GR, Simmons B, Ye C, Yan Y, Schadendorf D, Cinat G, Fein LE, Brown M, Guminski A, Haydon A, Khattak A, McNeil C, Parente P, Power J, Roberts-Thomson R, Sandhu S, Underhill C, Varma S, Berger T, Awada A, Blockx N, Buyse V, Mebis J, Franke FA, Jobim de Azevedo S, Silva Lazaretti N, Jamal R, Mihalcioiu C, Petrella T, Savage K, Song X, Wong R, Dabelic N, Plestina S, Vojnovic Z, Arenberger P, Kocak I, Krajsova I, Kubala E, Melichar B, Vantuchova Y, Putnik K, Dreno B, Dutriaux C, Grob JJ, Joly P, Lacour JP, Meyer N, Mortier L, Thomas L, Fluck M, Gambichler T, Hassel J, Hauschild A, Schadendorf D, Donnellan P, McCaffrey J, Power D, Ariad S, Bar-Sela G, Hendler D, Ron I, Schachter J, Ascierto P, Berruti A, Bianchi L, Chiarion Sileni V, Cognetti F, Danielli R, Di Giacomo AM, Gianni L, Goldhirsch A, Guida M, Maio M, Mandalà M, Marchetti P, Queirolo P, Santoro A, Kapiteijn E, Mackiewicz A, Rutkowski P, Ferreira P, Demidov L, Gafton G, Makarova Y, Andric Z, Babovic N, Jovanovic D, Kandolf Sekulovic L, Cohen G, et alMaio M, Lewis K, Demidov L, Mandalà M, Bondarenko I, Ascierto PA, Herbert C, Mackiewicz A, Rutkowski P, Guminski A, Goodman GR, Simmons B, Ye C, Yan Y, Schadendorf D, Cinat G, Fein LE, Brown M, Guminski A, Haydon A, Khattak A, McNeil C, Parente P, Power J, Roberts-Thomson R, Sandhu S, Underhill C, Varma S, Berger T, Awada A, Blockx N, Buyse V, Mebis J, Franke FA, Jobim de Azevedo S, Silva Lazaretti N, Jamal R, Mihalcioiu C, Petrella T, Savage K, Song X, Wong R, Dabelic N, Plestina S, Vojnovic Z, Arenberger P, Kocak I, Krajsova I, Kubala E, Melichar B, Vantuchova Y, Putnik K, Dreno B, Dutriaux C, Grob JJ, Joly P, Lacour JP, Meyer N, Mortier L, Thomas L, Fluck M, Gambichler T, Hassel J, Hauschild A, Schadendorf D, Donnellan P, McCaffrey J, Power D, Ariad S, Bar-Sela G, Hendler D, Ron I, Schachter J, Ascierto P, Berruti A, Bianchi L, Chiarion Sileni V, Cognetti F, Danielli R, Di Giacomo AM, Gianni L, Goldhirsch A, Guida M, Maio M, Mandalà M, Marchetti P, Queirolo P, Santoro A, Kapiteijn E, Mackiewicz A, Rutkowski P, Ferreira P, Demidov L, Gafton G, Makarova Y, Andric Z, Babovic N, Jovanovic D, Kandolf Sekulovic L, Cohen G, Dreosti L, Vorobiof D, Curiel Garcia MT, Diaz Beveridge R, Majem Tarruella M, Marquez Rodas I, Puliats Rodriguez JM, Rueda Dominguez A, Maroti M, Papworth K, Michielin O, Bondarenko I, Brown E, Corrie P, Harries M, Herbert C, Kumar S, Martin-Clavijo A, Middleton M, Patel P, Talbot T, Agarwala S, Chapman P, Conry R, Doolittle G, Gangadhar T, Hallmeyer S, Hamid O, Hernandez-Aya L, Johnson D, Kass F, Kolevska T, Lewis K, Lunin S, Salama A, Sikic B, Somer B, Spigel D, Whitman E. Adjuvant vemurafenib in resected, BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma (BRIM8): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19:510-520. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30106-2] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 152] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2017] [Revised: 01/05/2018] [Accepted: 01/08/2018] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
853
|
Wieder T, Eigentler T, Brenner E, Röcken M. Immune checkpoint blockade therapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2018; 142:1403-1414. [PMID: 29596939 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.02.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2017] [Revised: 02/09/2018] [Accepted: 02/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Immune checkpoints are accessory molecules that either promote or inhibit T-cell activation. Two inhibitory molecules, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), got high attention, as inhibition of CTLA-4 or PD-1 signaling provides the first immune therapy that significantly improves the survival of patients with metastatic solid cancers. Inhibition of CTLA-4 or PD-1 was first studied in and approved for patients with metastatic melanoma. Blocking immune checkpoints is also efficient in non-small-cell lung cancer, renal cell cancers, hypermutated gastrointestinal cancers, and others. Immune responses, whether directed against infections or against tumors, are divided into 2 phases: an initiation phase and an activation phase, where the immune system recognizes a danger signal and becomes activated by innate signals to fight the danger. This reaction is fundamental for the control of infections and cancer, but needs to be turned off once the danger is controlled, because persistence of this activation ultimately causes severe tissue damage. Therefore, each activation of the immune system is followed by a termination phase, where endogenous immune suppressor molecules arrest immune responses to prevent harmful damage. In the case of cancer immune therapies, therapeutic approaches classically enhanced the initiation and activation of immune responses to increase the emergence and the efficacy of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) against cancers. In sharp contrast, immune checkpoint blockade focuses on the termination of immune responses by inhibiting immune suppressor molecules. It thus prevents the termination of immune responses or even awakes those CTLs that became exhausted during an immune response. Therefore, blocking negatively regulating immune checkpoints restores the capacity of exhausted CTL to kill the cancer they infiltrate. In addition, they drive surviving cancer cells into a still poorly defined state of dormancy. As the therapy also awakes self-reactive CTL, one downside of the therapy is the induction of organ-specific autoimmune diseases. The second downside is the exorbitant drug price that withdraws patients in need from a therapy that was developed by academic research, which impairs further academic treatment development and financially charges the public health system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Wieder
- Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Eigentler
- Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Ellen Brenner
- Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Martin Röcken
- Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
854
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Prognosis of patients with advanced melanoma is dismal with a median overall survival of about 8 months and 5-year overall survival from a diagnosis of metastatic disease of roughly 10%. However, immune checkpoint inhibitors have brought indispensable benefits to melanoma patients. Here we will review the recent clinical efficacy and adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors for melanoma patients. RECENT FINDINGS The immune checkpoint inhibitors increase confirmed objective response and prolong progression-free and overall survival of the afflicted patients in association with maintaining their quality of life. Although diverse immune-related adverse events occur, most of them are manageable by appropriate immunomodulating agents. Clinical efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors continues even after discontinuation of drugs. Compared with conventional therapeutic options, the immune checkpoint inhibitors appear to prolong the survival of patients with advanced melanoma. Further clinical trials are warranted to determine whether their combinatory use with other treatment options may augment benefits or not.
Collapse
|
855
|
|
856
|
Mandalà M, Merelli B, Indriolo A, Tondini C. Late-occurring toxicity induced by an immune checkpoint blockade in adjuvant treatment of a stage III melanoma patient. Eur J Cancer 2018; 95:130-132. [PMID: 29559189 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2018] [Accepted: 02/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Mandalà
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.
| | - Barbara Merelli
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Amedeo Indriolo
- Unit of Gastroenterology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Carlo Tondini
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
857
|
Prieux-Klotz C, Dior M, Damotte D, Dreanic J, Brieau B, Brezault C, Abitbol V, Chaussade S, Coriat R. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Colitis: Diagnosis and Management. Target Oncol 2018; 12:301-308. [PMID: 28540478 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-017-0495-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors are monoclonal antibodies indicated for an increasing number of malignant diseases. These agents can cause specific side effects, which need to be anticipated while clear patterns of management need to be established. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated gastrointestinal side effects, including diarrhea and colitis, occur in up to 30% of patients. Severe colitis can lead to severe dehydration or intestinal perforation. Endoscopic lesions and histopathological features of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis are similar to an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) flare. Patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced diarrhea and colitis are treated with corticosteroids. Infliximab can be used in cases of corticosteroid failure. Rectosigmoïdoscopy or colonoscopy should be performed when severe immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis is suspected, but endoscopic investigations should not delay treatment. Specific patient education as well as co-operation between oncologists and gastroenterologists is essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Prieux-Klotz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cochin Teaching Hospital, 27, rue du faubourg Saint Jacques, 75014, Paris, France.
| | - Marie Dior
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cochin Teaching Hospital, 27, rue du faubourg Saint Jacques, 75014, Paris, France.,Sorbonne Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Diane Damotte
- Department of Pathology, Cochin Teaching Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Johann Dreanic
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cochin Teaching Hospital, 27, rue du faubourg Saint Jacques, 75014, Paris, France.,Sorbonne Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Bertrand Brieau
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cochin Teaching Hospital, 27, rue du faubourg Saint Jacques, 75014, Paris, France.,Sorbonne Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Catherine Brezault
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cochin Teaching Hospital, 27, rue du faubourg Saint Jacques, 75014, Paris, France.,Sorbonne Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Vered Abitbol
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cochin Teaching Hospital, 27, rue du faubourg Saint Jacques, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Stanislas Chaussade
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cochin Teaching Hospital, 27, rue du faubourg Saint Jacques, 75014, Paris, France.,Sorbonne Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Romain Coriat
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cochin Teaching Hospital, 27, rue du faubourg Saint Jacques, 75014, Paris, France.,Sorbonne Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
858
|
Gorry C, McCullagh L, O'Donnell H, Barrett S, Schmitz S, Barry M, Curtin K, Beausang E, Barry R, Coyne I. Neoadjuvant treatment for malignant and metastatic cutaneous melanoma. THE COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 2018. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Gorry
- National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics, St James's Hospital; St James's Hospital Dublin Ireland 8
| | - Laura McCullagh
- Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St James's Hospital; Pharmacology and Therapeutics; St James's Hospital Dublin Ireland Dublin 8
| | - Helen O'Donnell
- Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St James's Hospital; Pharmacology and Therapeutics; St James's Hospital Dublin Ireland Dublin 8
| | - Sarah Barrett
- Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St James's Hospital; Discipline of Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine; Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, James's St Dublin Ireland 8
| | - Susanne Schmitz
- Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St James's Hospital; Pharmacology and Therapeutics; St James's Hospital Dublin Ireland Dublin 8
- Luxembourg Institute of Health; Department of Population Health; 1A-B, rue Thomas Edison Strassen Luxembourg 1445
| | - Michael Barry
- Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St James's Hospital; Pharmacology and Therapeutics; St James's Hospital Dublin Ireland Dublin 8
| | - Kay Curtin
- Melanoma Support Ireland; Dublin Ireland
| | - Eamon Beausang
- St James's Hospital; Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery; Dublin Ireland 8
| | - Rupert Barry
- St James's Hospital; Dermatology; James Street Dublin Ireland 8
| | - Imelda Coyne
- Trinity College Dublin; School of Nursing & Midwifery; 24 D'Olier St Dublin Ireland 2
| |
Collapse
|
859
|
Stage at which riluzole treatment prolongs survival in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a retrospective analysis of data from a dose-ranging study. Lancet Neurol 2018. [PMID: 29525492 PMCID: PMC5899963 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(18)30054-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 179] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Riluzole is the only drug to prolong survival for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and, at a dose of 100 mg, was associated with a 35% reduction in mortality in a clinical trial. A key question is whether the survival benefit occurs at an early stage of disease, late stage, or is spread throughout the course of the disease. To address this question, we used the King's clinical staging system to do a retrospective analysis of data from the original dose-ranging clinical trial of riluzole. Methods In the original dose-ranging trial, patients were enrolled between December, 1992, and November, 1993, in Belgium, France, Germany, Spain, Canada, the USA, and the UK if they had probable or definite ALS as defined by the El Escorial criteria. The censor date for the riluzole survival data was set as the original study end date of Dec 31, 1994. For this analysis, King's clinical ALS stage was estimated from the electronic case record data of the modified Norris scale, UK Medical Research Council score for muscle strength, El Escorial category, vital capacity, and gastrostomy insertion data. The lowest allocated stage was 2 because the original trial only included patients with probable or definite ALS. We used a χ2 test to assess the independence of stage at trial enrolment and treatment group, Kaplan-Meier product limit distribution to test the transition from each stage to subsequent stages, and Cox regression to confirm an effect of treatment group on time in stage, controlling for covariates. We did sensitivity analyses by combining treatment groups, using alternative strategies to stage, stratifying by stage at trial enrolment, and using multistate outcome analysis of treatments (MOAT). Findings We analysed the case records of all 959 participants from the original dose-ranging trial, 237 assigned to 50 mg/day riluzole, 236 to 100 mg/day, 244 to 200 mg/day, and 242 to daily placebo. Clinical stage at enrolment did not significantly differ between treatment groups (p=0·22). Time in stage 4 was longer for patients receiving 100 mg/day riluzole than for those receiving placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0·55, 95% CI 0·36–0·83; log-rank p=0·037). Combining treatment groups and stratifying by stage at enrolment showed a similar result (HR 0·638, 95% CI 0·464–0·878; p=0·006), as did analysis with MOAT where the mean number of days spent in stage 4 was numerically higher for patients given riluzole at higher doses compared with patients receiving placebo. Time from stages 2 or 3 to subsequent stages or death did not differ between riluzole treatment groups and placebo (p=0·83 for stage 2 and 0·88 for stage 3). Interpretation We showed that riluzole prolongs survival in the last clinical stage of ALS; this finding needs to be confirmed in a prospective study, and treatment effects at stage 1 still need to be analysed. The ALS stage at which benefit occurs is important for counselling of patients before starting treatment. Staging should be used in future ALS clinical trials to assess the stage at which survival benefit occurs, and a similar approach could be used for other neurodegenerative diseases. Funding NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, The European Union Joint Programme on Neurodegeneration, and the King's Summer Undergraduate Studentship.
Collapse
|
860
|
Abstract
The immunotherapy is currently changing the landscape of oncology. Nowadays the standard of care in metastatic or unresectable melanoma patients include immunomodulating modalities such as anti-PD-1 drugs (nivolumab, pembrolizumab) and anti-CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab. The improvements of progression free survival and overall survival connected with those treatments were unprecedented and have been confirmed in stage III trials. The efficacy of immunotherapy in metastatic setting can be further upgraded in some groups of patients by combining both types of antibodies. Latest clinical data suggest that treatment with immunotherapy can be also favorable for patients in adjuvant setting. Other treatment approaches based on immunological response (e.g. oncolytic viruses or adoptive cell therapy) have been proven useful in specific clinical situations. The future of melanoma treatment is still evolving, new molecular targets are being invented and hopefully current endeavors will led to further improvement of patients’ survival. This review aims to summarize current state of immunotherapy in melanoma and identifying possible directions of development.
Collapse
|
861
|
Egger ME, Xiao D, Hao H, Kimbrough CW, Pan J, Rai SN, Cambon AC, Waigel SJ, Zacharias W, McMasters KM. Unique Genes in Tumor-Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes Associated with Nonsentinel Lymph Node Metastases in Melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:1296-1303. [PMID: 29497912 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6377-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current risk assessment tools to estimate the risk of nonsentinel lymph node metastases after completion lymphadenectomy for a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in cutaneous melanoma are based on clinical and pathologic factors. We identified a novel genetic signature that can predict non-SLN metastases in patients with cutaneous melanoma staged with a SLN biopsy. METHODS RNA was collected for tumor-positive SLNs in patients staged by SLN biopsy for cutaneous melanoma. All patients with a tumor-positive SLN biopsy underwent completion lymphadenectomy. A 1:10 case:control series of positive and negative non-SLN patients was analyzed by microarray and quantitative RT-PCR. Candidate differentially expressed genes were validated in a 1:3 case:control separate cohort of positive and negative non-SLN patients. RESULTS The 1:10 case:control discovery set consisted of 7 positive non-SLN cases matched to 70 negative non-SLN controls. The cases and controls were similar with regards to important clinicopathologic factors, such as gender, primary tumor site, age, ulceration, and thickness. Microarray and RT-PCR identified six potential differentially expressed genes for validation. In the 40-patient separate validation set, 10 positive non-SLN patients were matched to 30 negative non-SLN controls based on gender, ulceration, age, and thickness. Five of the six genes were differentially expressed. The five gene panel identified patients at low (7.1%) and high risk (66.7%) for non-SLN metastases. CONCLUSIONS A novel, non-SLN gene score based on differential expressed genes in a tumor-positive SLN can identify patients at high and low risk for non-SLN metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael E Egger
- Hiram C. Polk Jr., MD Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Deyi Xiao
- Hiram C. Polk Jr., MD Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Hongying Hao
- Hiram C. Polk Jr., MD Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Charles W Kimbrough
- Hiram C. Polk Jr., MD Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Jianmin Pan
- Biostatistics Shared Facility, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Shesh N Rai
- Biostatistics Shared Facility, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.,Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Alexander C Cambon
- Biostatistics Shared Facility, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Sabine J Waigel
- University of Louisville Genomics Facility, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Wolfgang Zacharias
- University of Louisville Genomics Facility, Louisville, KY, USA.,Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology and Toxicology, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Kelly M McMasters
- Hiram C. Polk Jr., MD Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
862
|
Ulmer A, Dietz K, Werner-Klein M, Häfner HM, Schulz C, Renner P, Weber F, Breuninger H, Röcken M, Garbe C, Fierlbeck G, Klein CA. The sentinel lymph node spread determines quantitatively melanoma seeding to non-sentinel lymph nodes and survival. Eur J Cancer 2018; 91:1-10. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2017] [Accepted: 12/03/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
863
|
Warner AB, Postow MA. The brim of uncertainty in adjuvant treatment of melanoma. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19:436-437. [PMID: 29477664 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30150-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2018] [Accepted: 01/29/2018] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Betof Warner
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael A Postow
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, 300 East 66th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
864
|
Lim KHJ, Spain L, Barker C, Georgiou A, Walls G, Gore M, Turajlic S, Board R, Larkin JM, Lorigan P. Contemporary outcomes from the use of regular imaging to detect relapse in high-risk cutaneous melanoma. ESMO Open 2018; 3:e000317. [PMID: 29531842 PMCID: PMC5844377 DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2017] [Revised: 01/16/2018] [Accepted: 01/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Agreement on the utility of imaging follow-up in patients with high-risk melanoma is lacking. A UK consensus statement recommends a surveillance schedule of CT or positron-emission tomography-CT and MRI brain (every 6 months for 3 years, then annually in years 4 and 5) as well as clinical examination for high-risk resected Stages II and III cutaneous melanoma. Our aim was to assess patterns of relapse and whether imaging surveillance could be of clinical benefit. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective study of patients enrolled between July 2013 and June 2015 from three UK tertiary cancer centres followed-up according to this protocol was undertaken. We evaluated time-to-recurrence (TTR), recurrence-free survival (RFS), method of detection and characteristics of recurrence, treatment received and overall survival (OS). RESULTS A total of 173 patients were included. Most (79%) had treated Stages IIIB and IIIC disease. With a median follow-up of 23.3 months, 82 patients (47%) had relapsed. Median TTR was 10.1 months and median RFS was 21.2 months. The majority of recurrences (66%) were asymptomatic and detected by scheduled surveillance scan. Fifty-six (68%) patients recurred with Stage IV disease, with a median OS of 25.3 months; 26 (31.7%) patients had a locoregional recurrence, median OS not reached (P=0.016). Patients who underwent surgery at recurrence for either Stage III (27%) or IV (18%) disease did not reach their median OS. The median OS for the 33 patients (40%) who received systemic therapy was 12.9 months. CONCLUSION Imaging appears to reliably detect subclinical disease and identify patients suitable for surgery, conferring favourable outcomes. The short median TTR provides rationale to intensify imaging schedule in the first year of surveillance. The poor OS of patients treated with systemic therapy probably reflects the relatively inferior treatment options during this time and requires further evaluation in the current era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kok Haw Jonathan Lim
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Lavinia Spain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Claire Barker
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, Lancashire, UK
| | - Alexandros Georgiou
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Gerard Walls
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Martin Gore
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Samra Turajlic
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Translational Cancer Therapeutics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Ruth Board
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, Lancashire, UK
| | - James M Larkin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Paul Lorigan
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
865
|
Patel PM, Ottensmeier CH, Mulatero C, Lorigan P, Plummer R, Pandha H, Elsheikh S, Hadjimichael E, Villasanti N, Adams SE, Cunnell M, Metheringham RL, Brentville VA, Machado L, Daniels I, Gijon M, Hannaman D, Durrant LG. Targeting gp100 and TRP-2 with a DNA vaccine: Incorporating T cell epitopes with a human IgG1 antibody induces potent T cell responses that are associated with favourable clinical outcome in a phase I/II trial. Oncoimmunology 2018; 7:e1433516. [PMID: 29872563 PMCID: PMC5980353 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2018.1433516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2017] [Revised: 01/22/2018] [Accepted: 01/22/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
A DNA vaccine, SCIB1, incorporating two CD8 and two CD4 epitopes from TRP-2/gp100 was evaluated in patients with metastatic melanoma. Each patient received SCIB1 via intramuscular injection with electroporation. The trial was designed to find the safest dose of SCIB1 which induced immune/clinical responses in patients with or without tumour. Fifteen patients with tumor received SCIB1 doses of 0.4-8 mg whilst 20 fully-resected patients received 2-8 mg doses. Twelve patients elected to continue immunization every 3 months for up to 39 months. SCIB1 induced dose-dependent T cell responses in 88% of patients with no serious adverse effects or dose limiting toxicities. The intensity of the T cell responses was significantly higher in patients receiving 4 mg doses without tumor when compared to those with tumor (p < 0.01). In contrast, patients with tumor showed a significantly higher response to the 8 mg dose than the 4 mg dose (p < 0.03) but there was no significant difference in the patients without tumor. One of 15 patients with measurable disease showed an objective tumor response and 7/15 showed stable disease. 5/20 fully-resected patients have experienced disease recurrence but all remained alive at the cut-off date with a median observation time of 37 months. A positive clinical outcome was associated with MHC-I and MHC-II expression on tumors prior to therapy (p = 0.027). We conclude that SCIB1 is well tolerated and stimulates potent T cell responses in melanoma patients. It deserves further evaluation as a single agent adjuvant therapy or in combination with checkpoint inhibitors in advanced disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Poulam M Patel
- Academic Department of Clinical Oncology, Division of Cancer & Stem Cells, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Christian H Ottensmeier
- Southampton Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre and Southampton University Hospitals, Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Paul Lorigan
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Ruth Plummer
- Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Medical School, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne and Wear, UK
| | - Hardev Pandha
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | - Somaia Elsheikh
- University of Nottingham, School of Medicine Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Naty Villasanti
- University of Nottingham, School of Medicine Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sally E Adams
- Scancell Limited, Academic Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Michelle Cunnell
- Academic Department of Clinical Oncology, Division of Cancer & Stem Cells, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Rachael L Metheringham
- Scancell Limited, Academic Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Victoria A Brentville
- Scancell Limited, Academic Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Lee Machado
- Scancell Limited, Academic Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Ian Daniels
- Scancell Limited, Academic Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Mohamed Gijon
- Scancell Limited, Academic Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Lindy G Durrant
- Academic Department of Clinical Oncology, Division of Cancer & Stem Cells, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,Scancell Limited, Academic Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
866
|
Cooper JS. Radiation Therapy Followed by Ipilimumab Is Appropriate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 98:13. [PMID: 28586951 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.12.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2016] [Accepted: 12/19/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jay S Cooper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York
| |
Collapse
|
867
|
Gartrell RD, Marks DK, Hart TD, Li G, Davari DR, Wu A, Blake Z, Lu Y, Askin KN, Monod A, Esancy CL, Stack EC, Jia DT, Armenta PM, Fu Y, Izaki D, Taback B, Rabadan R, Kaufman HL, Drake CG, Horst BA, Saenger YM. Quantitative Analysis of Immune Infiltrates in Primary Melanoma. Cancer Immunol Res 2018; 6:481-493. [PMID: 29467127 DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-17-0360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2017] [Revised: 11/06/2017] [Accepted: 02/15/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Novel methods to analyze the tumor microenvironment (TME) are urgently needed to stratify melanoma patients for adjuvant immunotherapy. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) analysis, by conventional pathologic methods, is predictive but is insufficiently precise for clinical application. Quantitative multiplex immunofluorescence (qmIF) allows for evaluation of the TME using multiparameter phenotyping, tissue segmentation, and quantitative spatial analysis (qSA). Given that CD3+CD8+ cytotoxic lymphocytes (CTLs) promote antitumor immunity, whereas CD68+ macrophages impair immunity, we hypothesized that quantification and spatial analysis of macrophages and CTLs would correlate with clinical outcome. We applied qmIF to 104 primary stage II to III melanoma tumors and found that CTLs were closer in proximity to activated (CD68+HLA-DR+) macrophages than nonactivated (CD68+HLA-DR-) macrophages (P < 0.0001). CTLs were further in proximity from proliferating SOX10+ melanoma cells than nonproliferating ones (P < 0.0001). In 64 patients with known cause of death, we found that high CTL and low macrophage density in the stroma (P = 0.0038 and P = 0.0006, respectively) correlated with disease-specific survival (DSS), but the correlation was less significant for CTL and macrophage density in the tumor (P = 0.0147 and P = 0.0426, respectively). DSS correlation was strongest for stromal HLA-DR+ CTLs (P = 0.0005). CTL distance to HLA-DR- macrophages associated with poor DSS (P = 0.0016), whereas distance to Ki67- tumor cells associated inversely with DSS (P = 0.0006). A low CTL/macrophage ratio in the stroma conferred a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.719 for death from melanoma and correlated with shortened overall survival (OS) in the complete 104 patient cohort by Cox analysis (P = 0.009) and merits further development as a biomarker for clinical application. Cancer Immunol Res; 6(4); 481-93. ©2018 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robyn D Gartrell
- Departments of Pediatrics, Pediatric Hematology/Oncology and Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center/New York Presbyterian, New York, New York
| | - Douglas K Marks
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center/New York Presbyterian, New York, New York
| | - Thomas D Hart
- Columbia University, Columbia College, New York, New York
| | - Gen Li
- Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | | | - Alan Wu
- Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Zoë Blake
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center/New York Presbyterian, New York, New York
| | - Yan Lu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center/New York Presbyterian, New York, New York
| | | | - Anthea Monod
- Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Camden L Esancy
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center/New York Presbyterian, New York, New York
| | | | - Dan Tong Jia
- Columbia University, College of Physician and Surgeons, New York, New York
| | - Paul M Armenta
- Columbia University, College of Physician and Surgeons, New York, New York
| | - Yichun Fu
- Columbia University, College of Physician and Surgeons, New York, New York
| | - Daisuke Izaki
- Columbia University, Columbia College, New York, New York
| | - Bret Taback
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center/New York Presbyterian, New York, New York
| | - Raul Rabadan
- Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Howard L Kaufman
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New York, New York
| | - Charles G Drake
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center/New York Presbyterian, New York, New York
| | - Basil A Horst
- Department of Dermatopathology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Yvonne M Saenger
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center/New York Presbyterian, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
868
|
Bello DM, Ariyan CE. Adjuvant Therapy in the Treatment of Melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:1807-1813. [PMID: 29468608 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6376-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle M Bello
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Charlotte E Ariyan
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
869
|
Padda A, Schiopu E, Sovich J, Ma V, Alva A, Fecher L. Ipilimumab induced digital vasculitis. J Immunother Cancer 2018; 6:12. [PMID: 29433584 PMCID: PMC5809839 DOI: 10.1186/s40425-018-0321-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2017] [Accepted: 01/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune check point inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as a new therapeutic paradigm for a variety of malignancies including metastatic melanoma. As the use of ICIs expand, immune-mediated adverse events are becoming a common occurrence. CASE PRESENTATION We describe the first reported patient with small vessel vasculitis, manifested by digital ischemia, following treatment with high dose Ipilimumab for resected stage IIIB/C melanoma. This patient received high dose steroids, five-day intravenous (IV) Epoprostenol protocol, botulinum toxin injections, and Rituximab 375 mg/m2 weekly for four cycles. With this treatment regimen, the digital ischemia did not progress proximally, but she did require multiple distal digit amputations about six months after the onset of her symptoms. CONCLUSIONS Prompt identification and management of immune related adverse events (IRAEs) are critical to optimal patient management. This patient's vasculitis did not reverse, but was likely halted and stabilized with multiple immunosuppressive medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amrita Padda
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Floor 3, Reception A, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, SPC 5342, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
| | - Elena Schiopu
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Floor 3, Reception A, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, SPC 5342, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
| | - Justin Sovich
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA
| | - Vincent Ma
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA
| | - Ajjai Alva
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA
| | - Leslie Fecher
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA
| |
Collapse
|
870
|
[Current aspects in the prognosis of advanced melanoma]. Hautarzt 2018; 69:249-259. [PMID: 29396638 DOI: 10.1007/s00105-018-4124-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
The therapy of metastatic melanoma has changed rapidly in recent years. Immune checkpoint blockade and targeted therapy have replaced less effective chemotherapies. New clinical studies also point towards a substantial benefit of these drugs for the adjuvant treatment of high-risk patients. Thus, the prognosis of advanced melanoma has improved. Nevertheless, it remains a life-threatening condition due to frequent relapses and progression of the disease. This article aims at providing an overview of current treatment strategies for metastasized melanoma and their impact on prognosis of the disease. In addition, changes in the recently published American Joint Committee of Cancer (AJCC) classification identifying groups at risk will be highlighted.
Collapse
|
871
|
Zager JS, Gastman BR, Leachman S, Gonzalez RC, Fleming MD, Ferris LK, Ho J, Miller AR, Cook RW, Covington KR, Meldi-Plasseraud K, Middlebrook B, Kaminester LH, Greisinger A, Estrada SI, Pariser DM, Cranmer LD, Messina JL, Vetto JT, Wayne JD, Delman KA, Lawson DH, Gerami P. Performance of a prognostic 31-gene expression profile in an independent cohort of 523 cutaneous melanoma patients. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:130. [PMID: 29402264 PMCID: PMC5800282 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4016-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2017] [Accepted: 01/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The heterogeneous behavior of patients with melanoma makes prognostication challenging. To address this, a gene expression profile (GEP) test to predict metastatic risk was previously developed. This study evaluates the GEP's prognostic accuracy in an independent cohort of cutaneous melanoma patients. METHODS This multi-center study analyzed primary melanoma tumors from 523 patients, using the GEP to classify patients as Class 1 (low risk) and Class 2 (high risk). Molecular classification was correlated to clinical outcome and assessed along with AJCC v7 staging criteria. Primary endpoints were recurrence-free (RFS) and distant metastasis-free (DMFS) survival. RESULTS The 5-year RFS rates for Class 1 and Class 2 were 88% and 52%, respectively, and DMFS rates were 93% versus 60%, respectively (P < 0.001). The GEP was a significant predictor of RFS and DMFS in univariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.4 and 6.6, respectively, P < 0.001 for each), along with Breslow thickness, ulceration, mitotic rate, and sentinel lymph node (SLN) status (P < 0.001 for each). GEP, tumor thickness and SLN status were significant predictors of RFS and DMFS in a multivariate model that also included ulceration and mitotic rate (RFS HR = 2.1, 1.2, and 2.5, respectively, P < 0.001 for each; and DMFS HR = 2.7, 1.3 and 3.0, respectively, P < 0.01 for each). CONCLUSIONS The GEP test is an objective predictor of metastatic risk and provides additional independent prognostic information to traditional staging to help estimate an individual's risk for recurrence. The assay identified 70% of stage I and II patients who ultimately developed distant metastasis. Its role in consideration of patients for adjuvant therapy should be examined prospectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan S Zager
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 10920 N. McKinley Drive room 4123, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Brian R Gastman
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Sancy Leachman
- Department of Dermatology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, 3303 S.W. Bond Avenue, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Rene C Gonzalez
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12801 E. 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Martin D Fleming
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 910 Madison, Suite 303, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA
| | - Laura K Ferris
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 3601 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Jonhan Ho
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 3708 Fifth Avenue, Suite 500.94, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Alexander R Miller
- START Center for Cancer Care, 4383 Medical Drive, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Robert W Cook
- Castle Biosciences, Inc., 820 S. Friendswood Drive, Suite 201, Friendswood, TX, 77546, USA
| | - Kyle R Covington
- Castle Biosciences, Inc., 820 S. Friendswood Drive, Suite 201, Friendswood, TX, 77546, USA
| | | | - Brooke Middlebrook
- Castle Biosciences, Inc., 820 S. Friendswood Drive, Suite 201, Friendswood, TX, 77546, USA
| | - Lewis H Kaminester
- Dermatology North Palm Beach, 840 U.S. Highway Number One, North Palm Beach, FL, 33408, USA
| | - Anthony Greisinger
- Research & Development, Kelsey Research Foundation, 5615 Kirby Drive, Suite 660, Houston, TX, 77005, USA
| | - Sarah I Estrada
- Affiliated Dermatology, 20401 North 73rd Street, Suite 230, Scottsdale, AZ, 85255, USA
| | - David M Pariser
- Pariser Dermatology Specialists, Virginia Clinical Research, Inc., 6160 Kempsville Circle, Suite 200A, Norfolk, VA, 23502, USA.,Eastern Virginia Medical School, P.O. Box 1980, Norfolk, VA, 23501-1980, USA
| | - Lee D Cranmer
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, 825 Eastlake Avenue E, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
| | - Jane L Messina
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 10920 N. McKinley Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - John T Vetto
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, 3303 S.W. Bond Avenue, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Jeffrey D Wayne
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 251 East Huron Street, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.,Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 North St. Clair Street, Suite 1600, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.,Skin Cancer Institute, Northwestern University, Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, 420 East Superior Street, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Keith A Delman
- Department of Surgery, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, 1364 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - David H Lawson
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, 550 Peachtree Street NE, Atlanta, GA, 30308, USA
| | - Pedram Gerami
- Skin Cancer Institute, Northwestern University, Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, 420 East Superior Street, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. .,Departments of Dermatology and Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 North St. Clair Street, Arkes 1600, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
872
|
Ng YYR, Tan GHC, Quek RHH, Farid MBHR, Soo KC, Teo MCC. Clinical patterns and management of primary mucosal melanoma: a single centre experience. ANZ J Surg 2018; 88:1145-1150. [PMID: 29388353 DOI: 10.1111/ans.14373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2017] [Revised: 11/19/2017] [Accepted: 12/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary mucosal melanomas (MM) are rare neoplasms arising from melanocytes in mucosal membranes. Delayed diagnosis and aggressive disease biology contribute to a poorer prognosis. The clinical patterns of MMs treated in a large tertiary centre, and the differences between MMs in the head and neck versus other anatomical sites are described. METHODS A retrospective review of 43 patients diagnosed with MM in the head and neck, urogenital, esophageal and anorectal sites from 1993 to 2015 was conducted. RESULTS Distribution of head and neck, urogenital and gastrointestinal MM were 42, 30 and 28% respectively. Disease extent was local in 44%, regional in 40% and distal in 12% at diagnosis. Head and neck MMs were more likely to be diagnosed at an earlier stage as compared to other sites (P = 0.04). Surgery was performed with curative intent in 72%, while 2% had palliative surgery for symptom control. Of the remaining patients who did not undergo surgery, four had palliative chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Median disease-free survival was 13 months (1-179 months). There was a significantly longer time to locoregional recurrence in head and neck MM (16 months) compared to other sites (11 months) (P = 0.03). The 2-year overall survival was also significantly higher in head and neck MM (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION MM of the head and neck is diagnosed at an earlier stage and associated with a longer time to locoregional recurrence. Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment and may offer long-term survival benefit in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne Y R Ng
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Grace H C Tan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Richard H H Quek
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Khee Chee Soo
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Melissa C C Teo
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
873
|
Khandekar MJ, Jain R. Smooth sailing for immunotherapy for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: the PACIFIC study. Transl Cancer Res 2018; 7:S16-S20. [PMID: 30175050 DOI: 10.21037/tcr.2017.12.17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Melin J Khandekar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rakesh Jain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Steele Laboratories for Tumor Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
874
|
Neurological Adverse Events Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Diagnosis and Management. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2018; 18:3. [PMID: 29392441 DOI: 10.1007/s11910-018-0810-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Immune checkpoint inhibitors represent a major step forward in the field of oncologic immunotherapy these last years and have significantly increased survival of cancer patients in an ever-growing number of indications. These agents block specific immune checkpoint molecules (programmed cell death protein 1 and its ligand as well as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4) that normally downregulate the immune response. These new agents show a specific range of adverse effects induced by abnormal immunologic activation. RECENT FINDINGS Many different neurologic adverse events have been described, including encephalitis, myelopathy, aseptic meningitis, meningoradiculitis, Guillain-Barré-like syndrome, peripheral neuropathy (including mononeuropathy, mononeuritis multiplex, and polyneuropathy) as well as myasthenic syndrome. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown promising results in cancer but can possibly induce autoimmune disorders. Although rare, neurological adverse events require prompt recognition and treatment to avoid substantial morbidity.
Collapse
|
875
|
Amaria RN, Prieto PA, Tetzlaff MT, Reuben A, Andrews MC, Ross MI, Glitza IC, Cormier J, Hwu WJ, Tawbi HA, Patel SP, Lee JE, Gershenwald JE, Spencer CN, Gopalakrishnan V, Bassett R, Simpson L, Mouton R, Hudgens CW, Zhao L, Zhu H, Cooper ZA, Wani K, Lazar A, Hwu P, Diab A, Wong MK, McQuade JL, Royal R, Lucci A, Burton EM, Reddy S, Sharma P, Allison J, Futreal PA, Woodman SE, Davies MA, Wargo JA. Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib versus standard of care in patients with high-risk, surgically resectable melanoma: a single-centre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19:181-193. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30015-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 218] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2017] [Revised: 09/18/2017] [Accepted: 09/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
876
|
Gasser O, Sharples KJ, Barrow C, Williams GM, Bauer E, Wood CE, Mester B, Dzhelali M, Caygill G, Jones J, Hayman CM, Hinder VA, Macapagal J, McCusker M, Weinkove R, Painter GF, Brimble MA, Findlay MP, Dunbar PR, Hermans IF. A phase I vaccination study with dendritic cells loaded with NY-ESO-1 and α-galactosylceramide: induction of polyfunctional T cells in high-risk melanoma patients. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2018; 67:285-298. [PMID: 29094183 PMCID: PMC11028320 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-017-2085-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2017] [Accepted: 10/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Vaccines that elicit targeted tumor antigen-specific T-cell responses have the potential to be used as adjuvant therapy in patients with high risk of relapse. However, the responses induced by vaccines in cancer patients have generally been disappointing. To improve vaccine function, we investigated the possibility of exploiting the immunostimulatory capacity of type 1 Natural killer T (NKT) cells, a cell type enriched in lymphoid tissues that can trigger improved antigen-presenting function in dendritic cells (DCs). In this phase I dose escalation study, we treated eight patients with high-risk surgically resected stage II-IV melanoma with intravenous autologous monocyte-derived DCs loaded with the NKT cell agonist α-GalCer and peptides derived from the cancer testis antigen NY-ESO-1. Two synthetic long peptides spanning defined immunogenic regions of the NY-ESO-1 sequence were used. This therapy proved to be safe and immunologically effective, inducing increases in circulating NY-ESO-1-specific T cells that could be detected directly ex vivo in seven out of eight patients. These responses were achieved using as few as 5 × 105 peptide-loaded cells per dose. Analysis after in vitro restimulation showed increases in polyfunctional CD4+ and CD8+ T cells that were capable of manufacturing two or more cytokines simultaneously. Evidence of NKT cell proliferation and/or NKT cell-associated cytokine secretion was seen in most patients. In light of these strong responses, the concept of including NKT cell agonists in vaccine design requires further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Gasser
- Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, PO Box 7060, Wellington, 6242, New Zealand
| | - Katrina J Sharples
- Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand
- Cancer Trials New Zealand, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
| | - Catherine Barrow
- Capital and Coast District Health Board, Private Bag 7902, Wellington, 6242, New Zealand
| | - Geoffrey M Williams
- Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
| | - Evelyn Bauer
- Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, PO Box 7060, Wellington, 6242, New Zealand
| | - Catherine E Wood
- Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, PO Box 7060, Wellington, 6242, New Zealand
- Capital and Coast District Health Board, Private Bag 7902, Wellington, 6242, New Zealand
| | - Brigitta Mester
- Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, PO Box 7060, Wellington, 6242, New Zealand
| | - Marina Dzhelali
- Capital and Coast District Health Board, Private Bag 7902, Wellington, 6242, New Zealand
| | | | - Jeremy Jones
- GlycoSyn, PO Box 31 310, Lower Hutt, 5040, New Zealand
| | - Colin M Hayman
- The Ferrier Research Institute, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 33436, Lower Hutt, 5046, New Zealand
| | - Victoria A Hinder
- Cancer Trials New Zealand, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
| | - Jerome Macapagal
- Cancer Trials New Zealand, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
| | - Monica McCusker
- Cancer Trials New Zealand, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
| | - Robert Weinkove
- Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, PO Box 7060, Wellington, 6242, New Zealand
- Capital and Coast District Health Board, Private Bag 7902, Wellington, 6242, New Zealand
| | - Gavin F Painter
- The Ferrier Research Institute, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 33436, Lower Hutt, 5046, New Zealand
| | - Margaret A Brimble
- Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
| | - Michael P Findlay
- Cancer Trials New Zealand, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
| | - P Rod Dunbar
- Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, PO Box 92019, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Ian F Hermans
- Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, PO Box 7060, Wellington, 6242, New Zealand.
- Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.
- School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, 6140, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
877
|
Abdel-Rahman O. Evaluation of the eighth American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for malignant melanoma of the skin. Future Oncol 2018; 14:471-481. [PMID: 29322826 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2017-0500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To validate the changes among the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) eighth staging system for cutaneous melanoma. METHODOLOGY Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database (2004-2014) was queried. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were evaluated according to both AJCC seventh and eighth systems. RESULTS Overall survival was assessed according to the two editions and p-values for overall trend were significant (p < 0.001) for all scenarios. Notably for pathologically staged patients, the mean survival for stage IIC was lower than that for stage IIIA and IIIB. Likewise, among clinically staged patients the mean survival for stage IIC was lower than that for stage III (these findings were identical among both editions). CONCLUSION AJCC eighth system holds comparable performance to AJCC seventh system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Abdel-Rahman
- Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Lofty Elsayed Street, Cairo, 11566, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
878
|
Lee RJ, Gremel G, Marshall A, Myers KA, Fisher N, Dunn JA, Dhomen N, Corrie PG, Middleton MR, Lorigan P, Marais R. Circulating tumor DNA predicts survival in patients with resected high-risk stage II/III melanoma. Ann Oncol 2018; 29:490-496. [PMID: 29112704 PMCID: PMC5834029 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 136] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with high-risk stage II/III resected melanoma commonly develop distant metastases. At present, we cannot differentiate between patients who will recur or those who are cured by surgery. We investigated if circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can predict relapse and survival in patients with resected melanoma. Patients and methods We carried out droplet digital polymerase chain reaction to detect BRAF and NRAS mutations in plasma taken after surgery from 161 stage II/III high-risk melanoma patients enrolled in the AVAST-M adjuvant trial. Results Mutant BRAF or NRAS ctDNA was detected (≥1 copy of mutant ctDNA) in 15/132 (11%) BRAF mutant patient samples and 4/29 (14%) NRAS mutant patient samples. Patients with detectable ctDNA had a decreased disease-free interval [DFI; hazard ratio (HR) 3.12; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.79-5.47; P < 0.0001] and distant metastasis-free interval (DMFI; HR 3.22; 95% CI 1.80-5.79; P < 0.0001) versus those with undetectable ctDNA. Detectable ctDNA remained a significant predictor after adjustment for performance status and disease stage (DFI: HR 3.26, 95% CI 1.83-5.83, P < 0.0001; DMFI: HR 3.45, 95% CI 1.88-6.34, P < 0.0001). Five-year overall survival rate for patients with detectable ctDNA was 33% (95% CI 14%-55%) versus 65% (95% CI 56%-72%) for those with undetectable ctDNA. Overall survival was significantly worse for patients with detectable ctDNA (HR 2.63; 95% CI 1.40-4.96); P = 0.003) and remained significant after adjustment for performance status (HR 2.50, 95% CI 1.32-4.74, P = 0.005). Conclusion ctDNA predicts for relapse and survival in high-risk resected melanoma and could aid selection of patients for adjuvant therapy. Clinical trial number ISRCTN 81261306.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R J Lee
- Molecular Oncology Group, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - G Gremel
- Molecular Oncology Group, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - A Marshall
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - K A Myers
- Oxford Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - N Fisher
- Oxford Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - J A Dunn
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - N Dhomen
- Molecular Oncology Group, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - P G Corrie
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - M R Middleton
- Oxford Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - P Lorigan
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Department of Medical Oncology, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - R Marais
- Molecular Oncology Group, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
879
|
Abdel-Rahman O. Surrogate end points for overall survival in trials of PD-(L)1 inhibitors for urinary cancers: a systematic review. Immunotherapy 2018; 10:139-148. [DOI: 10.2217/imt-2017-0115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: Numerous trials for PD-(L)1 inhibitors in the management of advanced urinary cancers (urothelial carcinoma and renal cell carcinoma) were published recently. It is not known exactly what should be the optimal surrogate end point for overall survival (OS) in this context. Materials & methods: PubMed database and ASCO meeting library were searched till August 2017. Eligible studies included prospective clinical studies evaluating PD-(L)1 inhibitors for the management of advanced urothelial carcinoma or renal cell carcinoma. The review author extracted relevant data on the characteristics of participants and the outcomes of the different studies. In order to conduct a proper correlation analysis, normality testing using Shapiro-Wilk test was first used. Based on the result of the normality testing, either Pearson's product–moment correlation or Spearman's rank correlation was used. Results: Thirteen trials (nine urothelial carcinoma and four renal cell carcinoma trials) with 2792 participants were included. The correlation of overall response rate with median OS was very weak to weak (for urothelial carcinoma: r = -0.120, n = 9, p = 0.758; for renal cell carcinoma: r = -0.397, n = 6, p = 0.436). Likewise, the correlation of progression-free survival with median OS was very weak to weak (for urothelial carcinoma: r = -0.024, n = 8, p = 0.955; for renal cell carcinoma: r = 0.394, n = 6, p = 0.440). On the other hand, 1-year survival rate may be a better surrogate end point for median OS (for urothelial carcinoma: r = 0.806, n = 8, p = 0.016; for renal cell carcinoma: r = 0.941, n = 6, p = 0.005). Conclusion: RECIST-defined overall response rate and progression-free survival are not reliable surrogate end points for median OS in trials of PD-(L)1 inhibitor therapy for urinary cancers. The use of other surrogate end points (e.g., 1-year survival) in early phase studies may be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Abdel-Rahman
- Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Lotfy Elsayed street, Cairo, 11331, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
880
|
Winer A, Bodor JN, Borghaei H. Identifying and managing the adverse effects of immune checkpoint blockade. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10:S480-S489. [PMID: 29593893 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.01.111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Immunotherapy has revolutionized the field of oncology. By inhibiting the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein (CTLA-4) and programmed death-1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint pathways, multiple studies have demonstrated greatly improved survival in locally advanced and metastatic cancers including melanoma, renal, lung, gastric, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Trials in other malignancies are ongoing, and undoubtedly the number of drugs in this space will grow beyond the six currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration. However, by altering the immune response to fight cancer, a new class of side effects has emerged known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). These adverse events are due to overactivation of the immune system in almost any organ of the body, and can occur at any point along a patient's treatment course. irAEs such as endocrinopathies (thyroiditis), colitis, and pneumonitis may occur more commonly. However, other organs such as the liver, heart, or brain may also be affected by immune overactivation and any of these side effects may become life threatening. This review presents an approach to promptly recognize and manage these toxicities, to hopefully minimize morbidity and mortality from irAEs.
Collapse
|
881
|
Ascierto PA, Eggermont AMM. Neoadjuvant therapy in melanoma: the next step? Lancet Oncol 2018; 19:151-153. [PMID: 29361473 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30016-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2017] [Accepted: 10/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo A Ascierto
- Unit of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapy, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione "G Pascale", 80131 Napoli, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
882
|
Lim SY, Lee JH, Diefenbach RJ, Kefford RF, Rizos H. Liquid biomarkers in melanoma: detection and discovery. Mol Cancer 2018; 17:8. [PMID: 29343260 PMCID: PMC5772714 DOI: 10.1186/s12943-018-0757-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2017] [Accepted: 01/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
A vast array of tumor-derived genetic, proteomic and cellular components are constantly released into the circulation of cancer patients. These molecules including circulating tumor DNA and RNA, proteins, tumor and immune cells are emerging as convenient and accurate liquid biomarkers of cancer. Circulating cancer biomarkers provide invaluable information on cancer detection and diagnosis, prognosticate patient outcomes, and predict treatment response. In this era of effective molecular targeted treatments and immunotherapies, there is now an urgent need to implement use of these circulating biomarkers in the clinic to facilitate personalized therapy. In this review, we present recent findings in circulating melanoma biomarkers, examine the challenges and promise of evolving technologies used for liquid biomarker discovery, and discuss future directions and perspectives in melanoma biomarker research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Su Yin Lim
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jenny H Lee
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Russell J Diefenbach
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard F Kefford
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Helen Rizos
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia. .,Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia. .,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, 2 Technology Place, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
883
|
Abstract
The incidence of melanoma continues to rise worldwide. Prior to 2010, there had been no progress in the treatment of advanced melanoma in living memory. Since then, immunotherapy has become a standard of care in the treatment of advanced melanoma. Nivolumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody against PD-1, which is a negative regulatory checkpoint in the T cells. The clinical benefit of nivolumab as a single agent is well established, with response rates of ≥40%, durable responses and a favorable tolerability profile. The combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab has also become a standard of care and the role of nivolumab in the adjuvant setting for high-risk patients has been recently confirmed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Gomes
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Paul Lorigan
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
884
|
Ye JC, Formenti SC. Integration of radiation and immunotherapy in breast cancer - Treatment implications. Breast 2018; 38:66-74. [PMID: 29253718 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2017] [Revised: 11/15/2017] [Accepted: 12/04/2017] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) has been successfully used in the treatment of breast cancer (BC) for over a century. While historically thought to be immunosuppressive, new data have shown that RT can work together with the immune system to eliminate cancer. It can cause immunogenic cell death and facilitate tumor neoantigen presentation and cross-priming of tumor-specific T-lymphocytes, turning irradiated tumor into an in-situ vaccine. Unfortunately, due to various immune escape mechanism put in place by the tumor, RT alone rarely results in a systemic response of metastatic disease sites (known as the abscopal effect). Immunotherapy, a series of agents designed to stimulate the immune system in order to generate tumor-specific immune response, is showing promise in treatment of various cancers, including BC, and can be an ideal complement to RT in stimulating a systemic immune response to reject the tumor cells. This review discusses the mechanisms in which RT can trigger an immune response for tumor rejection, and provide emerging preclinical and clinical data of combination immunoradiotherapy, and its potential in treating BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason C Ye
- USC Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
885
|
Barroso-Sousa R, Ott PA, Hodi FS, Kaiser UB, Tolaney SM, Min L. Endocrine dysfunction induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: Practical recommendations for diagnosis and clinical management. Cancer 2018; 124:1111-1121. [PMID: 29313945 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2017] [Revised: 11/21/2017] [Accepted: 11/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer therapy. However, because ICIs block coinhibitory molecules on T cells and other immune cells, unleashing them to mediate tumor cell killing, they also can disrupt the maintenance of immunological tolerance to self-antigens. Compared with chemotherapy, ICIs have a different toxicity profile, especially the occurrence of autoimmune-like manifestations against multiple organ systems, including endocrine glands, commonly referred to as immune-related adverse events. The aim of this review was to provide practical recommendations regarding the proper assessment and clinical management related to the new onset of endocrinopathies after the use of ICIs in patients with cancer. Cancer 2018;124:1111-21. © 2018 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Patrick A Ott
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - F Stephen Hodi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ursula B Kaiser
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Hypertension, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sara M Tolaney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Le Min
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Hypertension, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
886
|
Yang A, Baxi S, Korenstein D. ClinicalTrials.gov for Facilitating Rapid Understanding of Potential Harms of New Drugs: The Case of Checkpoint Inhibitors. J Oncol Pract 2018; 14:72-76. [PMID: 29298113 DOI: 10.1200/jop.2017.025114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Annie Yang
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Shrujal Baxi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
887
|
Melanoma: Immunotherapy in Advanced Melanoma and in the Adjuvant Setting. Oncoimmunology 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-62431-0_34] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|
888
|
Ye Z, Qian Q, Jin H, Qian Q. Cancer vaccine: learning lessons from immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Cancer 2018; 9:263-268. [PMID: 29344272 PMCID: PMC5771333 DOI: 10.7150/jca.20059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2017] [Accepted: 08/28/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer vaccines have been exclusively studied all through the past decades, and have made exceptional achievements in cancer treatment. Few cancer vaccines have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), for instance, Provenge, which was approved for the treatment of prostate carcinoma in 2012. Moreover, more recently, T-VEC got approval for the treatment of melanoma. While, the overall therapeutic effects of cancer vaccines have been taken into consideration as below expectations, low antigenicity of targeting antigen and tumor heterogeneity are the two key limiting barriers encountered by the cancer vaccines. Nonetheless, recent developments in cancer immune-therapies together with associated technologies, for instance the unparalleled achievements bagged by immune checkpoint inhibitor based therapies and neo-antigen identification tools, envisage potential improvements in cancer vaccines in respect to the treatments of malignancies. This review brings forth measures for the purpose of refining therapeutic cancer vaccines by learning lessons from the success of PD-1 inhibitor based immune-therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- ZhenLong Ye
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center for Cell Therapy, 75 Qianyang Road, Shanghai 201805, China
| | - Qiming Qian
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center for Cell Therapy, 75 Qianyang Road, Shanghai 201805, China
| | - HuaJun Jin
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center for Cell Therapy, 75 Qianyang Road, Shanghai 201805, China
| | - QiJun Qian
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center for Cell Therapy, 75 Qianyang Road, Shanghai 201805, China
| |
Collapse
|
889
|
Dong ZY, Zhang C, Li YF, Su J, Xie Z, Liu SY, Yan LX, Chen ZH, Yang XN, Lin JT, Tu HY, Yang JJ, Zhou Q, Sun YL, Zhong WZ, Wu YL. Genetic and Immune Profiles of Solid Predominant Lung Adenocarcinoma Reveal Potential Immunotherapeutic Strategies. J Thorac Oncol 2018; 13:85-96. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.10.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2017] [Revised: 10/08/2017] [Accepted: 10/13/2017] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
|
890
|
Berrocal A, Arance A, Castellon VE, de la Cruz L, Espinosa E, Cao MG, Larriba JLG, Márquez-Rodas I, Soria A, Algarra SM. SEOM clinical guideline for the management of malignant melanoma (2017). Clin Transl Oncol 2018; 20:69-74. [PMID: 29116432 PMCID: PMC5785602 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-017-1768-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2017] [Accepted: 10/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
All melanoma suspected patients must be confirmed histologically and resected. Sentinel node biopsy must be done when tumor is over 1 mm or if less with high-risk factors. Adjuvant therapy with interferon could be offered for patients with high-risk melanoma and in selected cases radiotherapy can be added. Metastatic melanoma treatment is guided by mutational BRAF status. BRAF wild type patients must receive anti-PD1 containing therapy and BRAF mutated patients BRAF/MEK inhibitors or anti-PD1 containing therapy. Up to 10 years follow up is reasonable for melanoma patients with dermatologic examinations and physical exams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Berrocal
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Avda. Tres Cruces 2, 46014 Valencia, Spain
| | - A. Arance
- Hospital Clinic I Provincial de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - L. de la Cruz
- Complejo Hospitalario Regional Virgen Macaren, Seville, Spain
| | - E. Espinosa
- Hospital Universitario la Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - M. G. Cao
- Hospital Universitario Quirón Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - A. Soria
- Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
891
|
Ferguson PM, Long GV, Scolyer RA, Thompson JF. Impact of genomics on the surgical management of melanoma. Br J Surg 2018; 105:e31-e47. [PMID: 29341162 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2017] [Revised: 09/28/2017] [Accepted: 10/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although surgery for early-stage melanoma offers the best chance of cure, recent advances in molecular medicine have revolutionized the management of late-stage melanoma, leading to significant improvements in clinical outcomes. Research into the genomic drivers of disease and cancer immunology has not only ushered in a new era of targeted and immune-based therapies for patients with metastatic melanoma, but has also provided new tools for monitoring disease recurrence and selecting therapeutic strategies. These advances present new opportunities and challenges to the surgeon treating patients with melanoma. METHODS The literature was reviewed to evaluate diagnostic and therapeutic advances in the management of cutaneous melanoma, and to highlight the impact of these advances on surgical decision-making. RESULTS Genomic testing is not required in the surgical management of primary melanoma, although it can provide useful information in some situations. Circulating nucleic acids from melanoma cells can be detected in peripheral blood to predict disease recurrence before it manifests clinically, but validation is required before routine clinical application. BRAF mutation testing is the standard of care for all patients with advanced disease to guide therapy, including the planning of surgery in adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings. CONCLUSION Surgery remains central for managing primary melanoma, and is an important element of integrated multidisciplinary care in advanced disease, particularly for patients with resectable metastases. The field will undergo further change as clinical trials address the relationships between surgery, radiotherapy and systemic therapy for patients with high-risk, early-stage and advanced melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P M Ferguson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - G V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - R A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - J F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
892
|
Iglesias P. Cancer immunotherapy-induced endocrinopathies: Clinical behavior and therapeutic approach. Eur J Intern Med 2018; 47:6-13. [PMID: 28826822 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2017.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2017] [Revised: 08/11/2017] [Accepted: 08/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Cancer immunotherapy has proven to be effective in a wide variety of tumors. The use of immune checkpoint blocking monoclonal antibodies has become a standard treatment regimen in some of them as advanced melanoma. However, given the mechanism of action, its use may be associated with immune-related adverse events that may complicate the clinical course and prognosis of patients. Among these are autoimmune endocrine adverse effects, such as hypophysitis, hypo and hyperthyroidism, and adrenal insufficiency. This review focuses on the most relevant and new aspects related to the incidence, clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment of these adverse effects associated with different types of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Iglesias
- Department of Endocrinology, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Ctra. de Colmenar, Km 9.100, 28034 Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
893
|
Determining the False-Negative Rate Using Fluorescence Image–Assisted Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Cutaneous Melanoma. Ann Plast Surg 2018; 80:54-58. [DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000001211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
894
|
Diem S, Hasan Ali O, Ackermann CJ, Bomze D, Koelzer VH, Jochum W, Speiser DE, Mertz KD, Flatz L. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in lymph node metastases of stage III melanoma correspond to response and survival in nine patients treated with ipilimumab at the time of stage IV disease. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2018; 67:39-45. [PMID: 28894934 PMCID: PMC11028172 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-017-2061-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2017] [Accepted: 09/03/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Prognosis of metastatic melanoma improved with the development of checkpoint inhibitors. The role of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in lymph node metastases of stage III melanoma remains unclear. We retrospectively characterized TILs in primary melanomas and matched lymph node metastases (stage III melanoma) of patients treated with the checkpoint inhibitor ipilimumab. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes were characterized for CD3, CD4, and CD8 expressions by immunohistochemistry. 4/9 patients (44%) responded to treatment with ipilimumab (1 complete and 2 partial remissions, 1 stable disease). All responders exhibited CD4 and CD8 T-cell infiltration in their lymph node metastases, whereas all non-responders did not show an infiltration of the lymph node metastasis with TILs. The correlation between the presence and absence of TILs in responders vs. non-responders was statistically significant (p = 0.008). Median distant metastases free survival, i.e., progression from stage III to stage IV melanoma, was similar in responders and non-responders (22.1 vs. 19.3 months; p = 0.462). Median progression free and overall survival show a trend in favor of the patients having TIL rich lymph node metastases (6.8 vs. 3.3 months, p = 0.09; and all alive at last follow-up vs. 8.2 months, respectively, p = 0.08). Our data suggest a correlation between the T-cell infiltration of the lymph node metastases in stage III melanoma and the response to ipilimumab once these patients progress to stage IV disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Diem
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Hospital Grabs, Grabs, Switzerland
| | - Omar Hasan Ali
- Department of Dermatology/Allergology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, Rorschacherstrasse 95, 9007, St. Gallen, Switzerland
- Institute of Immunobiology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Christoph J Ackermann
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - David Bomze
- Institute of Immunobiology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Viktor H Koelzer
- Institute of Pathology, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland
- Translational Research Unit (TRU), Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Wolfram Jochum
- Institute of Pathology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Daniel E Speiser
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital Center (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Epalinges, Switzerland
| | - Kirsten D Mertz
- Institute of Pathology, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland
| | - Lukas Flatz
- Department of Dermatology/Allergology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, Rorschacherstrasse 95, 9007, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
- Institute of Immunobiology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
895
|
Glitza Oliva IC, Alqusairi R. Immunotherapy for Melanoma. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2018; 995:43-63. [PMID: 30539505 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-02505-2_2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
While melanoma is less common than some other skin cancers, it is responsible for nearly 10,000 deaths in the USA each year alone. For many decades, very limited treatment options were available for patients with metastatic melanoma. However, recent breakthroughs have brought new hopes for patients and providers.While targeted therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors represents an important cornerstone in the treatment of metastatic melanoma, this chapter carefully reviews the past and current therapy options available, with a significant focus on immunotherapy-based approaches. In addition, we provide an overview of the results of recent advances in the adjuvant setting for patients with resected stage III and stage IV melanoma, as well as in patients with melanoma brain metastases. Finally, we provide a quick overview over the current research efforts in the field of immuno-oncology and melanoma.
Collapse
|
896
|
Suciu S, Eggermont AMM, Lorigan P, Kirkwood JM, Markovic SN, Garbe C, Cameron D, Kotapati S, Chen TT, Wheatley K, Ives N, de Schaetzen G, Efendi A, Buyse M. Relapse-Free Survival as a Surrogate for Overall Survival in the Evaluation of Stage II-III Melanoma Adjuvant Therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 2018; 110:4091329. [PMID: 28922786 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djx133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2016] [Accepted: 05/26/2017] [Indexed: 02/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Background We assessed whether relapse-free survival (RFS; time until recurrence/death) is a valid surrogate for overall survival (OS) among resected stage II-III melanoma patients through a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Methods Individual patient data (IPD) on RFS and OS were collected from 5826 patients enrolled in 11 randomized adjuvant trials comparing interferon (IFN) to observation. In addition, IPD from two studies comparing IFN and vaccination in 989 patients were included. A two-level modeling approach was used for assessing Spearman's patient-level correlation (rho) of RFS and OS and the trial-level coefficient of determination (R²) of the treatment effects on RFS and on OS. The results were validated externally in 13 adjuvant studies without available IPD. We then tested the results on the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 18071 double-blind trial comparing ipilimumab 10 mg/kg with placebo, which showed a statistically significant impact of the checkpoint inhibitor on RFS and OS. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results With a median follow-up of seven years, 12 of 13 trials showed a consistency between the IFN vs No IFN differences regarding RFS (hazard ratio [HR]RFS = 0.88) and OS (HROS = 0.91), but the small trial, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 2696, was an outlier (HRRFS = 0.72 vs HROS = 1.11). Therefore, even if rho was high, R² was low and could not reliably be estimated. Based on the 12 trials, rho remained high (0.89), and the hazard ratios for RFS and OS were strongly correlated (R² = 0.91). The surrogate threshold effect for RFS was estimated to be 0.77. For the EORTC 18071 trial, the hazard ratio for RFS was 0.75, predicting an effect of ipilimumab on OS. This was subsequently confirmed (HROS = 0.72, 95.1% confidence interval = 0.58 to 0.88, P = .001). Conclusions In high-risk stage II-III melanoma, RFS appeared to be a valid surrogate end point for OS for adjuvant randomized studies assessing interferon or a checkpoint inhibitor. In future similar adjuvant studies, a hazard ratio for RFS of 0.77 or less would predict a treatment impact on OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Suciu
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, Villejuif, France; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA; Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN; University of Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany; University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia; IDDI, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Alexander M M Eggermont
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, Villejuif, France; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA; Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN; University of Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany; University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia; IDDI, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Paul Lorigan
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, Villejuif, France; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA; Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN; University of Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany; University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia; IDDI, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - John M Kirkwood
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, Villejuif, France; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA; Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN; University of Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany; University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia; IDDI, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Svetomir N Markovic
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, Villejuif, France; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA; Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN; University of Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany; University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia; IDDI, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Claus Garbe
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, Villejuif, France; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA; Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN; University of Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany; University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia; IDDI, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - David Cameron
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, Villejuif, France; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA; Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN; University of Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany; University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia; IDDI, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Srividya Kotapati
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, Villejuif, France; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA; Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN; University of Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany; University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia; IDDI, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Tai-Tsang Chen
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, Villejuif, France; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA; Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN; University of Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany; University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia; IDDI, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Keith Wheatley
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, Villejuif, France; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA; Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN; University of Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany; University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia; IDDI, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Natalie Ives
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, Villejuif, France; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA; Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN; University of Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany; University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia; IDDI, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Gaetan de Schaetzen
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, Villejuif, France; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA; Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN; University of Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany; University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia; IDDI, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Achmad Efendi
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, Villejuif, France; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA; Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN; University of Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany; University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia; IDDI, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Marc Buyse
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, Villejuif, France; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA; Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN; University of Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany; University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia; IDDI, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
897
|
Vignot S, André T, Caux C, Bouleuc C, Evrard S, Gonçalves A, Lacroix M, Magné N, Massard C, Mazeron JJ, Orbach D, Rodrigues M, Thariat J, Wislez M, L'Allemain G, Bay JO. [Hot topics in 2017 in oncology and hematology. A selection by the editorial board of Bulletin du Cancer]. Bull Cancer 2017; 105:6-14. [PMID: 29269176 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2017.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2017] [Accepted: 10/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Actuality was dense in 2017 for oncology and hematology. The editorial board of the Bulletin du Cancer proposes a selection of key data distinguishing four trends: precision medicine, immunotherapy, focus on early stages and global management of metastatic disease. A summary of results which have been published or presented in congresses is proposed and the impact on daily practices is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stéphane Vignot
- Institut de cancérologie Jean-Godinot, département d'oncologie médicale, 1, rue du Général-Koenig, 51100 Reims, France.
| | - Thierry André
- Hôpital Saint-Antoine, oncologie médicale, 184, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Antoine, 75012 Paris, France
| | - Christophe Caux
- Université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, centre Léon-Bérard, 28, promenade-Léa-et-Napoléon-Bullukian, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - Carole Bouleuc
- Institut Curie, département interdisciplinaire de soins de support, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Serge Evrard
- Institut Bergonié, groupe digestif, 229, cours de l'Argonne, 33076 Bordeaux, France
| | - Anthony Gonçalves
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, département oncologie médicale, 232, boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009 Marseille, France
| | - Magali Lacroix
- Gustave-Roussy, département de pathologie, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France
| | - Nicolas Magné
- Institut de cancérologie Lucien-Neuwirth, département de radiothérapie, 108 bis, avenue Albert-Raimond, 42271 Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Christophe Massard
- Gustave-Roussy, département oncologie médicale, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France
| | - Jean-Jacques Mazeron
- Groupe hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, service de radiothérapie, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Daniel Orbach
- Institut Curie, centre oncologie soins, innovation recherche en oncologie de l'enfant, l'adolescent et du jeune adulte (SIREDO), MD, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Manuel Rodrigues
- Institut Curie, département oncologie médicale, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Juliette Thariat
- Centre François-Baclesse, département de radiothérapie, 3, avenue du Général-Harris, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Marie Wislez
- Hôpital Tenon, pneumologie, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
| | - Gilles L'Allemain
- Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis, CNRS, Inserm, UNS, institut de biologie Valrose, 06108 Nice cedex 2, France
| | - Jacques-Olivier Bay
- CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, service de thérapie cellulaire et d'hématologie clinique adulte, 1, place Lucie-Aubrac, 63003 Clermont-Ferrand cedex 1, France
| |
Collapse
|
898
|
De-novo and acquired resistance to immune checkpoint targeting. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18:e731-e741. [PMID: 29208439 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30607-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 533] [Impact Index Per Article: 66.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2017] [Revised: 07/21/2017] [Accepted: 07/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Use of immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the programmed cell death protein-1/programmed cell death-ligand 1 and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein-4 axes has yielded impressive results in some clinical trials. However, only a subset of patients initially respond to these inhibitors, and increasing clinical evidence indicates that a substantial proportion of initial responders ultimately relapse with lethal, drug-resistant disease months or years later. Studies that have used massively parallel sequencing have shed light on the rich functional landscape of mutations that endow tumour cells with the ability to evade T-cell-mediated immunosurveillance. Cancer genomes bear signatures of clonal evolution and selection, particularly implicating acquired defects in interferon receptor signalling and antigen presentation. In this Review, we discuss the biological processes that operate in the formation of so-called immunoresistant niches, and describe the latest progress in the development of combination strategies to reinstate immunosurveillance in immune-refractory tumours.
Collapse
|
899
|
Patel RJ, Liu MA, Amaraneni A, Sindhu SK. Rare side effect of adjuvant ipilimumab after surgical resection of melanoma: Guillain-Barré syndrome. BMJ Case Rep 2017; 2017:bcr-2017-221318. [PMID: 29237657 PMCID: PMC5728207 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2017-221318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Guillain-Barré syndrome is a life-threatening neurological disorder that presents with rapid ascending paralysis and areflexia. Guillain-Barré syndrome is traditionally associated with infections from a gastrointestinal or respiratory tract source. We report the case of a 71-year-old man with melanoma who was treated with ipilimumab as adjuvant immunotherapy and subsequently developed Guillain-Barré syndrome. The diagnosis was made clinically through physical exam findings. He was successfully treated with a combination of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy and corticosteroids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohini J Patel
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, The University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Michael A Liu
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, The University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Akshay Amaraneni
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, The University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Simran K Sindhu
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, The University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
900
|
Sykes EK, McDonald CE, Ghazanfar S, Mactier S, Thompson JF, Scolyer RA, Yang JY, Mann GJ, Christopherson RI. A 14-Protein Signature for Rapid Identification of Poor Prognosis Stage III Metastatic Melanoma. Proteomics Clin Appl 2017; 12:e1700094. [PMID: 29227041 DOI: 10.1002/prca.201700094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2017] [Revised: 09/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To validate differences in protein levels between good and poor prognosis American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage III melanoma patients and compile a protein panel to stratify patient risk. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Protein extracts from melanoma metastases within lymph nodes in patients with stage III disease with good (n = 16, >4 years survival) and poor survival (n = 14, <2 years survival) were analyzed by selected reaction monitoring (SRM). Diagonal Linear Discriminant Analysis (DLDA) was performed to generate a protein biomarker panel. RESULTS SRM analysis identified ten proteins that were differentially abundant between good and poor prognosis stage III melanoma patients. The ten differential proteins were combined with 22 proteins identified in our previous work. A panel of 14 proteins was selected by DLDA that was able to accurately classify patients into prognostic groups based on levels of these proteins. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE The ten differential proteins identified by SRM have biological significance in cancer progression. The final signature of 14 proteins identified by SRM could be used to identify AJCC stage III melanoma patients likely to have poor outcomes who may benefit from adjuvant systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin K Sykes
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Shila Ghazanfar
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Swetlana Mactier
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,University of Sydney at Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Jean Y Yang
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Graham J Mann
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.,University of Sydney at Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|