Effect of Anlotinib as a Third-Line or Further Treatment on Overall Survival of Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The ALTER 0303 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial

Effectiveness and Safety of Anlotinib Combined with PD-1 Blockades in Patients with Previously Immunotherapy Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Exploratory Study

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and tolerability of anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades in patients with previously immunotherapy treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

A total of 67 patients with previously immunotherapy treated advanced NSCLC who received anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades in clinical practice were screened retrospectively. All the PD-1 blockades used in this study were approved in China and consisted of sintilimab, camrelizumab, tislelizumab and pembrolizumab. Effectiveness and safety of anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades were assessed, and all patients were followed up regularly. Clinical significance between response status to previous immune-related treatment regimens and therapeutic outcomes of anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades was further explored.

Results

The best overall response among the 67 patients suggested that a partial response was observed in 16 patients, stable disease was noted in 41 patients and progressive disease was found in 10 patients, which yielded an objective response rate of 23.9% (95% CI: 14.3-35.9%) and a disease control rate of 85.1% (95% CI: 74.3-92.6%). Prognostic outcomes indicated that the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.1 months (95% CI: 2.37-9.83) and the median overall survival (OS) was 16.5 months (95% CI: 10.73-22.27). Exploratory analysis highlighted that patients who were intolerant to previous immune-related regimens (17 patients) might have a superior prognosis (median OS: 22.3 months vs 12.5 months, P=0.024). Additionally, adverse reactions with any grades during anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades administration were observed in 62 patients (92.5%), of which 31 patients (46.3%) had ≥grade 3 adverse reactions. Most common adverse reactions were fatigue, hypertension, diarrhea and hepatotoxicity.

Conclusion

Anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades demonstrated promising effectiveness and tolerable safety in patients with previously immunotherapy treated advanced NSCLC. Those who were intolerant to previous immune-related regimens might benefit significantly from treatment with anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades. This conclusion should be confirmed in future studies.

Mechanisms of angiogenesis in tumour

Angiogenesis is essential for tumour growth and metastasis. Antiangiogenic factor-targeting drugs have been approved as first line agents in a variety of oncology treatments. Clinical drugs frequently target the VEGF signalling pathway during sprouting angiogenesis. Accumulating evidence suggests that tumours can evade antiangiogenic therapy through other angiogenesis mechanisms in addition to the vascular sprouting mechanism involving endothelial cells. These mechanisms include (1) sprouting angiogenesis, (2) vasculogenic mimicry, (3) vessel intussusception, (4) vascular co-option, (5) cancer stem cell-derived angiogenesis, and (6) bone marrow-derived angiogenesis. Other non-sprouting angiogenic mechanisms are not entirely dependent on the VEGF signalling pathway. In clinical practice, the conversion of vascular mechanisms is closely related to the enhancement of tumour drug resistance, which often leads to clinical treatment failure. This article summarizes recent studies on six processes of tumour angiogenesis and provides suggestions for developing more effective techniques to improve the efficacy of antiangiogenic treatment.

Anlotinib Inhibits Cisplatin Resistance in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Cells by Inhibiting MCL-1 Expression via MET/STAT3/Akt Pathway

Background

Anlotinib is an effective targeted therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and has been found to mediate chemoresistance in many cancers. However, the underlying molecular mechanism of anlotinib mediates cisplatin (DDP) resistance in NSCLC remains unclear.

Methods

Cell viability was assessed by the cell counting kit 8 assay. Cell proliferation, migration, and invasion were determined using the colony formation assay and transwell assay. The mRNA expression levels of mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) and myeloid cell leukemia-1 (MCL-1) were measured by quantitative real-time PCR. Protein expression levels of MET, MCL-1, and STAT3/Akt pathway-related markers were examined using western blot analysis.

Results

Our data showed that anlotinib inhibited the DDP resistance of NSCLC cells by regulating cell proliferation and metastasis. Moreover, MET and MCL-1 expression could be decreased by anlotinib treatment. Silencing of MET suppressed the activity of the STAT3/Akt pathway and MCL-1 expression. Furthermore, MET overexpression reversed the inhibitory effect of anlotinib on the DDP resistance of NSCLC cells, and this effect could be eliminated by MCL-1 knockdown or ACT001 (an inhibitor for STAT3/Akt pathway).

Conclusion

Our results confirmed that anlotinib inhibited DDP resistance in NSCLC cells, which might decrease MCL-1 expression via mediating the MET/STAT3/Akt pathway.

QALY-type preference and willingness-to-pay among end-of-life patients with cancer treatments: a pilot study using discrete choice experiment

PURPOSE

Quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) is a dominant measurement of health gain in economic evaluations for pricing drugs. However, end-of-life (EoL) patients' preference for QALY gains in life expectancy (LE) and quality of life (QoL) during different disease stages remains unknown and is seldom involved in decision-making. This study aims to measure preferences and willingness-to-pay (WTP) towards different types of QALY gain among EoL cancer patients.

METHODS

We attributed QALY gain to four types, gain in LE and QoL, respectively, and during both progression-free survival (PFS) and post-progression survival (PPS). A discrete choice experiment including five attributes (the four QALY attributes and one cost attribute) with three levels each was developed and conducted with 85 Chinese advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients in 2022. All levels were set with QALY gain/cost synthesised from research on anti-lung cancer drugs recently listed by Chinese National Healthcare Security Administration. Each respondent answered six choice tasks in a face-to-face interview. The data were analysed using mixed logit models.

RESULTS

Patients valued LE-related QALY gain in PFS most, with a relative importance of 81.8% and a WTP of $43,160 [95% CI 26,751 ~ 59,569] per QALY gain. Respondents consistently preferred LE-related to QoL-related QALY gain regardless of disease stage. Patients with higher income or lower education levels tended to pay more for QoL-related QALY gain.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest a prioritised resource allocation to EoL-prolonging health technologies. Given the small sample size and large individual heterogeneity, a full-scale study is needed to provide more robust results.

Anlotinib suppressed tumor cell proliferation and migration in hypopharyngeal carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to study the in-vitro effects of multitarget inhibitor anlotinib on hypopharyngeal cancer cell proliferation and cell migration, and the underlying mechanism, which will provide new drug choices for hypopharyngeal cancer treatment.

METHODS

The Hypopharyngeal cancer Fadu cells were treated with anlotinib at a concentration of 0, 5, and 10 μmoL/L, respectively. Cell counting kit-8 and the colony-forming assay were used to detect the inhibition of cell proliferation. Wound-healing assay and transwell assay were used to detect the migration and invasion ability of cells. Flow cytometry was used to detect the effects of anlotinib on cell cycle and apoptosis. RT-qPCR and Western blot were used to measure gene expression levels.

RESULTS

CCK-8 and colony-forming assay showed that anlotinib could significantly inhibit cell proliferative activity. Wound-healing assay and transwell assay showed that anlotinib could inhibit cell migration and scratch. These results showed that anlotinib has obvious antitumor activity. Flow cell cycle experiment showed that anlotinib could promote Fadu cell apoptosis and block the G2/M phase for inhibiting cell proliferation. In addition, anlotinib decreased the expression of HIF-1α.

CONCLUSIONS

Anlotinib has an excellent suppressing effect on the proliferation, migration, and invasion of hypopharyngeal cancer Fadu cells in-vitro. Moreover, it can play an anti-tumor role through blocking cell cycle G2/M and promoting apoptosis, which may be related to the decrease of HIF-1a expression. Our study would provide a potential treatment method for patients with hypopharyngeal cancer.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

SOD2 confers anlotinib resistance via regulation of mitochondrial damage in OSCC

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies had revealed that anlotinib had outstanding anti-tumor efficacy on oral squamous cell carcinoma. However, the underlying mechanism is still unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Anlotinib resistant OSCC cells were established and analyzed by RNA-sequencing. The correlations between SOD2 expression and anlotinib resistance were investigated in OSCC cells and PDX models. Functional assays were performed to verify the SOD2 expression and anlotinib resistance in OSCC cells.

RESULTS

Anlotinib resistant genes were enriched in the biological processes of mitochondrion organization and the gene pathway of reactive oxygen species. SOD2 expression level was positively correlated with the resistance of anlotinib in OSCC cells and PDX models. Higher SOD2 expression of OSCC cells was more resistant to anlotinib. Anlotinib induced ROS generation, apoptosis and mitochondrial damage in OSCC cells, which can be enhanced by SOD2 knockdown and decreased by SOD2 overexpression. Mitochondrial damage was identified as swelling and cristae disappearance morphology under TEM, decreased mitochondrial membrane potential and lower MFN2 expression.

CONCLUSIONS

SOD2 may be capable of protecting mitochondria by downregulating ROS generation, which contributes to the resistance of anlotinib in OSCC cells. SOD2 can be utilized as a potential therapeutic target to improve the anti-cancer efficacy of anlotinib in OSCC.

Clinical outcomes and medical resource utilization of toripalimab combination therapy versus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the real-world clinical efficacy and safety, economic burdens and medical resource utilization (MRU) of toripalimab treatment patterns compared with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy (BCP) for patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC in China.

METHODS

Progression-free survival (PFS), adverse drug reactions (ADR) and the costs of drugs, laboratory testing, imageology examinations (including CT, B ultrasound, MRI), medical service, nursing, treatment, genetic test and medical disposable material were compared between two groups. A retrospective observational study was conducted with electronic medical records from Fudan University Huashan hospital. Data was obtained from established electronic medical records (EMRs) and patient surveys. Survival time from the study enrollment to disease progression or death plus from 1st progression disease (PD) in the maintenance phase to 2nd PD (PFS II), adverse events (AE), direct medical costs, MRU and AE-related costs were collected and compared between toripalimab group and BCP group. A total of 246 patients were enrolled.

RESULTS

Toripalimab combination therapy has significantly prolonged PFS comparing with BCP (13.8 months vs. 6.2 months, p < .001). A statistically significant improvement in PFS was observed favoring all toripalimab regimen subgroups compared with the bevacizumab group. Patients in toripalimab group occupied more overall resource consumption, more direct medical costs ($47,056.9 vs. $29,951.0, p < .0001) and AE-related costs ($4,500.2 vs. $784.4, p < .0001) than BCP group. Although patients in the toripalimab group used more drugs to prevent AEs ($4,500.2 vs. $784.4, p < .0001), they still experienced more AEs than patients in BCP group (51.4% vs. 41.4%).

CONCLUSION

Toripalimab combination therapy could significantly prolonged PFS for patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC compared with BCP, but at the expense of more MRU, costs and AEs.

[Chinese Expert Consensus on Second-line Treatment for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with Negative Driver Gene Mutations]

For advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with negative driver gene mutations, chemotherapy has always been the standard treatment option, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) provide other treatment option for these patients. At present, the first-line treatment can choose chemotherapy, anti-angiogenic drugs or immunotherapy. Although the initial treatment can achieve a certain clinical curative effect, disease progression or treatment failure is eventually unavoidable. The second-line and subsequent treatments have poor efficacy and more effective drugs are needed clinically. An expert panel of respiratory medicine, pathology and medical oncology organized by Expert Committee on Non-small Cell Lung Cancer of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology conducted an in-depth discussion on evidences of clinical studies for second-line treatment of NSCLC patients with negative driver gene mutations, aiming to provide guidances for Chinese clinicians in choosing second-line treatment for NSCLC patients with negative driver gene mutations.
.

Case report: Successful treatment of advanced pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma with BUBIB-ALK rearrangement and KRAS G12C mutation by sintilimab combined with anlotinib

Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is a rare and aggressive subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that is characterized by poor differentiation and invasiveness. According to the World Health Organization, PSC exhibits sarcoma or sarcomatoid differentiation and typically presents with an insidious onset, lacking specific symptoms and signs. It is associated with high malignancy, early metastasis, short survival time, and a poor prognosis. Treatment for PSC follows a similar approach to NSCLC; however, it presents significant challenges due to its high resistance to chemotherapy. Previous research has demonstrated the coexistence of two or more target mutations in PSC, and the presence of multiple mutations is correlated with higher mortality rates compared to single mutations. This is supported by our case study of a male patient with advanced BUBIB-ALK rearrangement and KRAS G12C missense mutation. There is currently no standard treatment protocol available for patients with this condition. The patient showed rapid progression after 1 month of alectinib treatment and was intolerant to paclitaxel + cisplatin chemotherapy. Following this, successful disease control was achieved with a combination therapy of sintilimab and anlotinib. The patient achieved a progression-free survival (PFS) of over 20 months, and long-term follow-up is still ongoing for the patient. Based on our clinical experience, the combination of anlotinib and programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors may be a promising strategy for PSC patients, particularly those with multi-target mutations who do not respond to ALK-TKI and are resistant to chemotherapy.

A phase Ib/II study of cadonilimab (PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody) plus anlotinib as first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Cadonilimab is a bispecific antibody that simultaneously targets programmed cell death receptor-1 and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of cadonilimab plus anlotinib for the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without sensitizing EGFR/ALK/ROS1 mutations.

METHODS

Patients received cadonilimab 15 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg every three weeks (Q3W) plus anlotinib at doses of 10 or 12 mg once daily for two weeks on a one-week-off schedule. The primary endpoints included safety and objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Sixty-nine treatment-naïve patients received cadonilimab 15 mg/kg Q3W combination (n = 49) and 10 mg/kg Q3W combination (n = 20). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 48 (98.0%) and 19 (95.0%) patients, with grade ≥3 TRAEs occurring in 29 (59.2%) and five (25.0%) patients, respectively. TRAEs leading to cadonilimab discontinuation occurred in eight (16.3%) and one (5.0%) patients in the cadonilimab 15 mg/kg Q3W and 10 mg/kg Q3W dosing groups. The confirmed ORRs were 51.0% (25/49) and 60.0% (12/20) accordingly.

CONCLUSIONS

Cadonilimab 10 mg/kg Q3W plus anlotinib showed manageable safety and promising efficacy as a first-line chemo-free treatment for advanced NSCLC.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT04646330.

Positive response to trastuzumab deruxtecan in a patient with HER2-mutant NSCLC after multiple lines therapy, including T-DM1: a case report

Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) mutations are uncommon in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the lack of established, effective, targeted drugs has resulted in a persistently poor prognosis. Herein, we report the case of a non-smoking, 58-year-old man diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma (cT3N0M1c, stage IVB) harboring a HER2 mutation (Y772_A775dupYVMA) and PD-L1 (-). The patient's Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) score was assessed as 1. He commenced first-line treatment with chemotherapy, followed by immuno-chemotherapy, and with disease progression, he received HER2-targeted therapy and chemotherapy with an anti-angiogenic agent. However, HER2-targeted therapy, including pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitors (afatinib, pyrotinib, and pozitinib) and antibody-drug conjugate (T-DM1), produced only stable disease (SD) as the best response. After the previously described treatment, primary tumor recurrence and multiple brain metastases were observed. Despite the patient's compromised overall physical condition with a PS score of 3-4, he was administered T-DXd in addition to whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Remarkably, both intracranial metastases and primary lesions were significantly reduced, he achieved a partial response (PR), and his PS score increased from 3-4 to 1. He was then treated with T-DXd for almost 9 months until the disease again progressed, and he did not discontinue the drug despite the occurrence of myelosuppression during this period. This is a critical case as it exerted an effective response to T-DXd despite multiple lines therapy, including T-DM1. Simultaneously, despite the occurrence of myelosuppression in the patient during T-DXd, it was controlled after aggressive treatment.

TQB2450 in patients with advanced malignant tumors: results from a phase I dose-escalation and expansion study

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy has demonstrated impressive clinical benefits in multiple tumor types. TQB2450, a novel monoclonal antibody targeting programmed cell death ligand 1, has shown safety and efficacy in preclinical studies.

Objectives

This first-in-human study aimed to evaluate the safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), immunogenicity, and preliminary antitumor activity of TQB2450 in patients with advanced malignant tumors.

Design and methods

In this phase I study, eligible patients with advanced malignant tumors received intravenous TQB2450 once every 3 weeks. This study consisted of a 3 + 3 dose-escalation phase (1-30 mg/kg) and a specific dose-expansion phase (1200 mg). The primary endpoints were maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and safety. The secondary endpoints were PK, immunogenicity, and investigator-assessed response rate.

Results

Between April 2018 and February 2020, 40 patients were enrolled (22 in the dose-escalation phase and 18 in the dose-expansion phase). No DLT was reported and the MTD was not reached. Grade ⩾3 or worse treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 11 (27.50%) patients, with the most frequent being aspartate aminotransferase increased (5.00%), leukopenia (5.00%), and anemia (5.00%). Treatment-related serious AEs were reported in six patients, the most common of which was decompensated liver function (5.00%). No treatment-related death was reported. The maximum serum concentration of TQB2450 increased in a dose-proportional manner. Treatment-induced anti-drug antibodies were detected in 31.58% (12/38) of patients. The investigator assessed the objective response rate as 5.00% and the disease control rate was 52.50%, including 2 partial responses and 19 stable diseases. The median progression-free survival was 2.69 (95% confidence interval, 2.07-6.14) months.

Conclusion

TQB2450 has a manageable safety profile with favorable PK and immunogenicity and has shown early evidence of clinical activity in advanced malignant tumors.

ClinicalTrialsgov identifier

NCT03460457.

Recent advances of anti-angiogenic inhibitors targeting VEGF/VEGFR axis

Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF), Vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR) and their downstream signaling pathways are promising targets in anti-angiogenic therapy. They constitute a crucial system to regulate physiological and pathological angiogenesis. In the last 20 years, many anti-angiogenic drugs have been developed based on VEGF/VEGFR system to treat diverse cancers and retinopathies, and new drugs with improved properties continue to emerge at a fast rate. They consist of different molecular structures and characteristics, which enable them to inhibit the interaction of VEGF/VEGFR, to inhibit the activity of VEGFR tyrosine kinase (TK), or to inhibit VEGFR downstream signaling. In this paper, we reviewed the development of marketed anti-angiogenic drugs involved in the VEGF/VEGFR axis, as well as some important drug candidates in clinical trials. We discuss their mode of action, their clinical benefits, and the current challenges that will need to be addressed by the next-generation of anti-angiogenic drugs. We focus on the molecular structures and characteristics of each drug, including those approved only in China.

Anlotinib alone or in combination with bevacizumab in the treatment of recurrent high-grade glioma: a prospective single-arm, open-label phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Anlotinib is a multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), and c-Kit. This phase II study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of anlotinib, either alone or in combination with bevacizumab (Bev) for recurrent high-grade glioma (rHGG) (NCT04822805, 30/03/2021).

METHODS

Eligible patients had a histological diagnosis of rHGG with first or subsequent recurrences. All patients received oral anlotinib 12 mg or 10 mg on days 1-14 (repeated every 21 days). In cases where brain magnetic resonance imaging examination revealed an increase in peritumoral edema without worsening of symptoms, patients received a temporary treatment of intravenous bevacizumab 10 mg/kg to alleviate edema. The primary endpoint was the median progression-free survival (mPFS), and the secondary endpoints included median overall survival (mOS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients with rHGG were included in the efficacy and safety assessments. Eighteen patients received anlotinib alone, and seven patients received anlotinib in combination with Bev. For all patients, the mPFS and mOS were 5.0 months and 13.6 months, respectively. The ORR was 32%, and the DCR was 96%. It is noteworthy that the survival and response data of recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) exhibit similarities to those of rHGG. For rGBM patients, there were no significant differences in mPFS, mOS, ORR, or DCR between the anlotinib alone and anlotinib + Bev groups. However, the incidence of treatment-related adverse events of any grade was higher in the anlotinib + Bev group compared to the anlotinib alone group (100% vs. 78%, p = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

Both anlotinib alone and its combination with Bev demonstrated good efficacy and safety in the treatment of rHGG.

A Pilot Study of Anlotinib as a Combination Treatment in Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

AIMS

To investigate the short-term objective response and treatment toxicity of anlotinib as a combination treatment in patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (RM-NPC).

METHODS

Patients with RM-NPC who received anlotinib as a combination treatment between March 2021 and July 2022 were retrospectively analyzed.The efficacy and safety of anlotinib as a combination treatment were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 17 patients with RM-NPC were included in this study. Of these patients, 2 (11.8%) had local recurrence, 4 (23.5%) had cervical lymph node recurrence, and 11 (64.9%) had distant failure. The most common metastatic site was the liver (47.1%), followed by the lung (23.5%) and bone (23.5%). Anlotinib was given as first-line treatment in 3 patients (17.6%), second lines treatment in 7 patients (41.2%), and third to six-lines treatment in 7 patients (41.2%). All patients received anlotinib combined with chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy. One patient achieved a complete response (5.9%), 7 patients had a partial response (41.2%), 5 patients had stable disease (29.4%), and 4 patients had progressive disease (23.5%). The overall disease control rate and the overall response rate were 76.5% and 47.1%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 8.1 months, and the median overall survival was not reached. The incidence of grade 3 adverse events was 30%. No unexpected side effects or treatment-related death were observed.

CONCLUSION

Anlotinib, as a combination treatment, has a promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with RM-NPC. Our results add to the growing evidence that supports the benefits of combining antiangiogenic drugs in RM-NPC. Randomized controlled clinical trials investigating the evaluation of anlotinib are warranted.

Aurora-A inhibitor synergistically enhances the inhibitory effect of anlotinib on hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly malignant tumor with a global prevalence. In addition to the existing clinical guidelines, the effectiveness of anlotinib and Aurora-A inhibitors in treating HCC has also been demonstrated. However, Anlotinib, as an anti-angiogenesis therapy, has shown significant benefits in clinical trials but is limited by its single-agent treatment and the development of drug resistance. Aurora-A inhibitors are currently being tested in clinical trials but have limited efficacy. Combination therapy may offer clear advantages over monotherapy in this context.

METHODS

In this study, we used HCC cell lines to investigate whether the combination of the two drugs could enhance their individual strengths and mitigate their weaknesses, thereby providing greater clinical benefits both in vitro and in vivo.

RESULTS

Our findings confirmed that the Aurora-A inhibitor alisertib and anlotinib exhibited a time-dose-dependent inhibitory effect on HCC cells. In vitro cytological experiments demonstrated that the combination of the two drugs synergistically inhibited cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis, while promoting cell apoptosis. Furthermore, we identified the underlying molecular mechanism by which the combination of the Aurora-A inhibitor alisertib and anlotinib inhibited HCC through the inhibition of the NF-ĸB signaling pathway.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, we have demonstrated the effectiveness of combining anlotinib with an Aurora-A inhibitor, which expands the potential applications of anlotinib in the clinical treatment of HCC in the future.

Primary Pulmonary Lymphoepithelioma-like Carcinoma: A Case Report Utilizing Camrelizumab and Anlotinib for Prolonged Survival

BACKGROUND

Primary Pulmonary Lymphoepithelioma-like Carcinoma (PPLELC) is a rare form of cancer for which no standard treatment has been established to date. Patients with advanced-stage PPLELC generally have a poor prognosis with overall survival of 22.7 months.

CASE PRESENTATION

Here, we report a case of advanced primary pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma. Initially, the patient underwent a first-line (GP) and a second-line (DP) of chemotherapy, which provided temporary relief but resulted in varying degrees of myelosuppression. When the disease progressed again, we administered a third-line treatment consisting of camrelizumab combined with anlotinib.

RESULT

This resulted in a progression-free survival of over 26 months without significant toxic side effects.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that combining camrelizumab and anlotinib could lead to a long progressionfree survival in patients with advanced PPLELC.

Receptor tyrosine kinase gene expression profiling of orbital rhabdomyosarcoma unveils MET as a potential biomarker and therapeutic target

Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) serve as molecular targets for the development of novel personalized therapies in many malignancies. In the present study, expression pattern of receptor tyrosine kinases and its clinical significance in orbital RMS has been explored. Eighteen patients with histopathologically confirmed orbital RMS formed part of this study. Comprehensive q-PCR gene expression profiles of 19 RTKs were generated in the cases and controls. The patients were followed up for 59.53 ± 20.93 years. Clustering and statistical analysis tools were applied to identify the significant combination of RTKs associated with orbital rhabdomyosarcoma patients. mRNA overexpression of RTKs which included MET, AXL, EGFR was seen in 60-80% of cases; EGFR3, IGFR2, FGFR1, RET, PDGFR1, VEGFR2, PDGFR2 in 30-60% of cases; and EGFR4, FGFR3,VEGFR3 and ROS,IGFR1, EGFR1, FGFR2, VEGFR1 in 10-30% of cases. Immunoexpression of MET was seen in 89% of cases. A significant association was seen between MET mRNA and its protein expression. In all the cases MET gene expression was associated with worst overall survival (P = 0.03).There was a significant correlation of MET mRNA expression with RET, ROS, AXL, FGFR1, FGFR3, PDGFR1, IGFR1, VEGFR2, and EGFR3 genes. Association between MET gene and collective expression of RTKs was further evaluated by semi-supervised gene cluster analysis and Principal component analysis, which showed well-separated tumor clusters. MET gene overexpression could be a useful biomarker for identifying high risk orbital rhabdomyosarcoma patients. Well-separated tumor clusters confirmed the association between MET gene and collective expression of RTK genes. Therefore, the therapeutic potential of multi-kinase inhibitors targeting MET and the 9 other significant RTKs needs to be explored.

Silencing TRIM29 Sensitizes Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Cells to Anlotinib by Promoting Apoptosis via Binding RAD50

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have proposed that the transcriptional regulatory factor tripartite motif containing 29 (TRIM29) is involved in carcinogenesis via binding with nucleic acid. TRIM29 is confirmed to be highly expressed when the cancer cells acquire therapy-resistant properties. We noticed that TRIM29 levels were significantly increased in anlotinib-resistant NCIH1975 (NCI-H1975/AR) cells via mining data information from gene expression omnibus (GEO) gene microarray (GSE142031; log2 fold change > 1, p < 0.05).

OBJECTIVE

Our study aimed to investigate the function of TRIM29 on the resistance to anlotinib in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells, including NCI-H1975 and A549 cells.

METHODS

Real-time RT-PCR and western blot were used to detect TRIM29 expression in anlotinib- resistant NSCLC (NSCLC/AR) cells. Apoptosis were determined through flow cytometry, acridine orange/ethidium bromide staining as well as western blot. ELISA was used to measure the content of C-X3-C motif chemokine ligand 1. Co-Immunoprecipitation assay was performed to verify the interaction between TRIM29 and RAD50 double-strand break repair protein (RAD50).

RESULTS

TRIM29 expression was shown to be elevated in the cytoplasm and nucleus of NSCLC/ AR cells compared to normal NSCLC cells. Next, we demonstrated that TRIM29 knockdown facilitated apoptosis and enhanced the sensitivity to anlotinib in NSCLC/AR cells. Based on the refined results citing from the database BioGRID, it was proved that TRIM29 interacted with RAD50. Herein, RAD50 overexpression diminished the pro-apoptotic effect induced by silencing TRIM29 in anlotinib-resistant A549 (A549/AR) cells.

CONCLUSION

Finally, we concluded that the increased sensitivity to anlotinib in NSCLC/AR cells was achieved by knocking down TRIM29, besides, the positive effects of TRIM29 knockdown were attributed to the promotion of apoptosis via binding to RAD50 in NSCLC/AR cell nucleus. Therefore, TRIM29 might become a potential target for overcoming anlotinib resistance in NSCLC treatment.

Impact of Anti-angiogenic Drugs on Severity of COVID-19 in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction: The 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has reshaped oncology practice, but the impact of anti-angiogenic drugs on the severity of COVID-19 in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. Patients and Methods: We carried out a retrospective study involving 166 consecutive patients with NSCLC who were positive for COVID-19, aiming to determine the effects of anti-angiogenic drugs on disease severity, as defined by severe/critical symptoms, intensive care unit (ICU) admission/intubation, and mortality outcomes. Risk factors were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Results: Of the participants, 73 had been administered anti-angiogenic drugs (termed the anti-angiogenic therapy (AT) group), while 93 had not (non-AT group). Comparative analyses showed no significant disparity in the rates of severe/critical symptoms (21.9% vs 35.5%, P = 0.057), ICU admission/intubation (6.8% vs 7.5%, P = 0.867), or death (11.0% vs 9.7%, P = 0.787) between these two groups. However, elevated risk factors for worse outcomes included age ≥ 60 (odds ratio (OR): 2.52, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07-5.92), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or higher (OR: 21.29, 95% CI: 4.98-91.01), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR: 7.25, 95% CI: 1.65-31.81), hypertension (OR: 2.98, 95% CI: 1.20-7.39), and use of immunoglobulin (OR: 5.26, 95% CI: 1.06-26.25). Conclusion: Our data suggests that the use of anti-angiogenic drugs may not exacerbate COVID-19 severity in NSCLC patients, indicating their potential safe application even during the pandemic period.

Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib in EGFR-Positive Patients with Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Compared with Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Study

There are no standard third-line or beyond treatments for patients with driver mutation-positive advanced lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Anlotinib was approved as a third-line multitarget drug in China in 2018. Limited data are available regarding the efficacy and safety of anlotinib compared with chemotherapy. To investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib compared with traditional chemotherapy in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive advanced LUAD. We conducted a retrospective study of 83 EGFR mutation-positive patients with advanced LUAD between 2011 and 2022. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the primary endpoints, whereas the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were the secondary endpoints. Anlotinib-related adverse events (AEs) were recorded to evaluate the safety of anlotinib. 39 patients with LUAD received anlotinib and 44 patients with LUAD received chemotherapy were enrolled in the study. Patients treated with anlotinib exhibited longer PFS (11.2 vs 4.5 months, P < .01) and OS (18.8 vs 15.8 months, P < .05) than patients treated with chemotherapy. There were no significant differences in ORR (7.9% vs 20.5%, P = .129) or DCR (100% vs 93.2%, P = .120) between the two groups. Anlotinib-related AEs grading 3-4 level were observed in 2 (5.1%) patients, no anlotinib-related death was recorded. Cox regression analyses of PFS and OS showed that brain metastases and age < 30 years at diagnosis had negative effects on clinical outcomes. Anlotinib is effective and safe in patients with EGFR-positive advanced LUAD. Patients without brain metastases had better clinical outcomes.

Advances in Predictive Biomarkers for Anti-Angiogenic Therapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

This study aimed to explore advances in biomarkers related to anti-angiogenic therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), thereby enhancing treatment selection, advancing personalized and precision medicine to improve treatment outcomes and patient survival rates. This article reviews key discoveries in predictive biomarkers for anti-angiogenic therapy in NSCLC in recent years, such as (1) liquid biopsy predictive biomarkers: studies have identified activated circulating endothelial cells (aCECs) via liquid biopsy as potential predictive biomarkers for the efficacy of anti-angiogenic therapy; (2) imaging biomarkers: advanced imaging technologies, such as dynamic contrast-enhanced integrated magnetic resonance positron emission tomography (MR-PET), are used to assess tumor angiogenesis in patients with NSCLC and evaluate the clinical efficacy of anti-angiogenic drugs; (3) genetic predictive biomarkers: research has explored polymorphisms of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1 (VEGFR-1) and vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), as well as how plasma levels of VEGF-A can predict the outcomes and prognosis of patients with non-squamous NSCLC undergoing chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab. Despite progress in identifying biomarkers related to anti-angiogenic therapy, several challenges remain, including limitations in clinical trials, heterogeneity in NSCLC, and technical hurdles. Future research will require extensive clinical validation and in-depth mechanistic studies to fully exploit the potential of these biomarkers for personalized treatment.

Immunotherapy Guided by Immunohistochemistry PD-L1 Testing for Patients with NSCLC: A Microsimulation Model-Based Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

BACKGROUND

On the basis of immunohistochemistry PD-L1 testing results, patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are treated differently. Theoretically, patients with high PD-L1 expression (50% or 1%) should receive PD-1 monotherapy for fewer adverse reactions and cost savings from avoiding chemotherapy; however, there is controversy surrounding the cut-off criteria (1% or 50%) for immunohistochemistry testing and threshold for PD-1 monotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to predict the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different immunotherapy strategies for patients with NSCLC in China from the healthcare system perspective.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A microsimulation model was developed to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three treatment strategies: PD-L1 testing (1%) (PD-1 monotherapy for those with PD-L1 expression at 1% threshold, and combination with chemotherapy for others with immunohistochemistry testing), PD-L1 testing (50%) (PD-1 monotherapy for those with PD-L1 expression at 50% threshold, and combination with chemotherapy for others with immunohistochemistry testing), and No PD-L1 testing (PD-1 combined with chemotherapy without immunohistochemistry testing). The model assumed 1000 patients per strategy, with each patient entering a unique clinical path prior to receiving treatment on the basis of PD-L1 test results. Clinical inputs were derived from clinical trials. Cost and utility parameters were obtained from the database and literature. One-way probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) and six scenario analyses were used to test the model's robustness.

RESULTS

The study revealed a hierarchy of survival benefits across three strategies, with No PD-L1 testing demonstrating the most survival advantage, followed by PD-L1 testing (50%), and finally, PD-L1 testing (1%). The comparative analysis demonstrated that No PD-L1 testing significantly enhanced overall survival (OS) (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.93), progression-free survival (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.75-0.90), and progression-free2 survival (PFS2) (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83-0.99) when juxtaposed against PD-L1 testing (1%). However, these improvements were not as pronounced when compared with PD-L1 testing (50%), particularly in relation to PFS, PFS2, and OS. The cost-effectiveness analysis further unveiled incremental cost-utility ratios (ICUR), with No PD-L1 testing versus PD-L1 testing (50%) at $34,003 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and No PD-L1 testing versus PD-L1 testing (1%) at $34,804 per QALY. In parallel, the ICUR for PD-L1 testing (50%) versus PD-L1 testing (1%) stood at $35,713 per QALY. Remarkably, the PSA result under a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $10,144 per QALY, with a 100% probability, demonstrated PD-L1 testing (1%) as the most cost-effective option.

CONCLUSIONS

The survival benefits of PD-1 monotherapy for high expression with PD-L1 immunohistochemistry testing are inferior to those of PD-1 combined with chemotherapy without testing, but it is found to be more cost-effective at the WTP thresholds in China and holds great potential in increasing affordability and reducing the economic burden.

Sotorasib versus Docetaxel for treatment of US and Chinese patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with KRAS p.G12C-mutated: A cost-effectiveness analysis to inform drug pricing

BACKGROUND

The cost-effectiveness of sotorasib and its reasonable price in the United States (US) and China remain unknown. Our objective was to estimate the price at which sotorasib could be economical as second-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients with Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog p.G12C-mutation in 2 countries.

METHODS

We conducted an economic evaluation from the perspective of US and Chinese payers. To analyze US patients, we built a partitioned survival model. However, since we lacked Asian-specific overall survival data, we created a state transition model for the Chinese patients. We obtained patients' baseline characteristics and clinical data from CodeBreaK200, while utilities and costs were gathered from public databases and published literature. We calculated costs (US dollar), life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. We conducted price simulation to guide pricing strategies. Additionally, we assessed the reliability of our results through sensitivity analyses, scenario analyses, and subgroup analyses.

RESULTS

The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of sotorasib compared to docetaxel were $1501,852 per quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) in the US and $469,106/QALY in China, respectively, which meant sotorasib was unlikely to be economical at the currently available price of $20,878 (240 × 120 mg) in both countries. Price simulation results revealed that sotorasib would be preferred at a price lower than $1400 at the willingness-to-pay threshold of $37,376 in China and a price lower than $2220 at the willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000 in the US. Sensitivity, scenario, and subgroup analyses showed that these conclusions were generally robust, the model was most sensitive to the utilities of progression-free survival and post-progression survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Sotorasib could potentially be a cost-effective therapy in the US and China following price reductions. Our evidence-based pricing strategy can assist decision-makers and clinicians in making optimal decisions. However, further analysis of budget impact and affordability is needed.

Comparison of efficacy and safety between PD-1 inhibitors and PD-L1 inhibitors plus platinum-etoposide as first-line treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a multicenter, real-world analysis

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy in combination with platinum-etoposide (EP) chemotherapy has been approved as a first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, real-world (RW) data regarding the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in ES-SCLC are lacking. We aimed to assess the differences between programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors, both in conjunction with EP chemotherapy, as first-line treatment for ES SCLC.

METHODS

We conducted a real-world, multicenter, retrospective cohort, controlled study to compare the prognosis, efficacy, and safety of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in ES-SCLC patients when used along with chemotherapy. Each patient received up to six cycles of etoposide, carboplatin, or cisplatin combined with ICI drugs, including PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors. The primary endpoints were investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were the investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST, version 1.1).

RESULTS

Between January 2017 and December 2021, 194 patients with ES-SCLC from three clinical centers in a PLA general hospital were included in our study, including 93 patients in the PD-1 group and 101 patients in the PD-L1 group. At the time of data cutoff, progression-free survival in the PD-1 group (median PFS, 6.8 months; 95% CI, 5.3-8.1) was similar to that in the PD-L1 group (median PFS, 6.4 months; 95% CI, 5.5-7.5); the stratified hazard ratio for PFS was 1.12 (95% CI, 0.83-1.53; P = 0.452). The median OS was similar in the PD-1 and PD-L1 groups (15.8 m vs. 17.7 m, P = 0.566); the hazard ratio was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.62-1.30, P = 0.566). The two groups had comparable investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rates (ORR) (76.3% vs. 76.2%). Adverse effect (AE)-related discontinuation occurred in 4 (4.3%) patients in the PD-1 group and 2 (2.0%) patients in the PD-L1 group. Deaths due to AEs of any cause occurred in 2 (2.2%) patients in the PD-1 inhibitor group and 1 (1.0%) patient in the PD-L1 inhibitor group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our research revealed that there were no significant differences in efficacy or prognosis between PD-1 inhibitor + EP chemotherapy and PD-L1 inhibitor + EP chemotherapy. The two groups seemed to have comparable safety profiles, but the number of discontinuation or death events was too small to draw a firm conclusion.

Research Progress on Mechanism and Management of Adverse Drug Reactions of Anlotinib

Anti-angiogenesis therapy plays a vital role in the treatment of tumors, with anlotinib as its representative targeted drug. Anlotinib is a novel oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with inhibitory effects on tumor growth tumor angiogenesis. In Phase III clinical trials, anlotinib demonstrated better overall survival and progression-free survival than placebo in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and was approved for the first time as a third-line treatment for refractory advanced NSCLC. Going far beyond that, anlotinib has shown encouraging results in a variety of malignancies, including medullary thyroid carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, gastric cancer and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Nevertheless, anlotinib has been subject to some controversy in terms of adverse events due to its widespread use. In this review, the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic characteristics, adverse reactions in clinical use and management of anlotinib were summarized.

Stevens-Johnson syndrome induced by toripalimab in a previously EGFR-TKI-treated advanced lung adenocarcinoma patient harboring EGFR mutations 19 del/T790M/C797S in trans and cis: a case report

Background: The treatment paradigm for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is rapidly changing. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibodies have increasingly been incorporated into routine care for nearly all patients with NSCLC. Toripalimab was recently approved as the first-line treatment for advanced non-squamous NSCLC in combination with chemotherapy. Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) is a rare but potentially fatal complication of TKI and anti-PD-1 therapy. We reported a case of SJS after sequential use of EGFR-TKIs and toripalimab in an NSCLC patient with EGFR mutations 19 del/T790M/C797S in trans and cis. Case presentation: A 58-year-old man with stage IV NSCLC received gefitinib because next-generation sequencing (NGS) revealed an EGFR 19del, followed by osimertinib and pemetrexed with the emergence of EGFR T790M. Four EGFR mutations 19 del/T790M/C797S in trans and cis were detected after osimertinib resistance. The combination of toripalimab and docetaxel was administered as a third-line treatment. The patient developed SJS at 21 days, and toripalimab was discontinued. After treatment with methylprednisolone and prednisolone, the skin toxicity of the patient gradually decreased and eventually disappeared. The patient received osimertinib and anlotinib after recovery, and SJS has not recurred. The ongoing treatment is still effective and results in stable disease. Conclusion: We reported the first case of SJS induced by toripalimab in a patient with lung adenocarcinoma harboring multiple EGFR mutations. The TKI treatment after SJS was well tolerated and effective.

Anlotinib as a third-line or further treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a single-arm, phase 2 clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Treatment options beyond the first-line setting for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RM-NPC) are limited. The role of the multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor anlotinib in RM-NPC is unclear.

METHODS

In this prospective, single-arm, phase 2 trial, patients with histologically confirmed RM-NPC and failure of at least two lines of prior systemic treatments were eligible. Anlotinib was given at 12 mg once daily on days 1-14 every 3 weeks until disease progression or intolerable toxicities. The primary end point was disease control rate, defined as the percentage of patients achieving complete response, partial response, or stable disease by RECIST criteria.

RESULTS

From April 2019 to March 2021, 39 patients were enrolled and received a median of 4 cycles (range, 0.5-20) of anlotinib treatment. Partial response and stable disease were observed in 8 and 20 patients, respectively. The disease control rate was 71.8%, and objective response rate was 20.5%. With a median follow-up of 17.2 months, the median progression-free survival was 5.7 months. The 12-month overall survival was 58.3%, and the median overall survival was not reached. The most frequent grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were hand-foot syndrome (23.7%), oral mucositis (21.0%), hypertension (7.9%), and triglyceride elevation (7.9%). Hemorrhage, all grade 1 or 2, occurred in 34.2% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Anlotinib monotherapy exhibited promising anti-tumor activities and disease control for heavily pretreated RM-NPC patients with a tolerable toxicity profile.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03906058.

Pembrolizumab combined with anlotinib improves therapeutic efficacy in pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma with TMB-H and PD-L1 expression: a case report and literature review

Background

Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is a unique subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a high degree of malignancy and poor therapeutic effects. With the widespread use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in recent years, few studies have reported that immunotherapy is effective against PSC. As a multi-target anti-vascular targeting agent, anlotinib showed a better anti-tumor effect in various cancer species. The paper reported the therapeutic and side effects of pembrolizumab combined with anlotinib in a patient with advanced PSC.

Case presentation

This is a 73 year old female patient who underwent thoracoscopy right upper lobectomy and was diagnosed as locally advanced PSC. However, the patient experienced tumor recurrence and metastasis 7 weeks after surgery and was unable to tolerate chemoradiotherapy. Moreover, she detected TP53 mutation and found that tumor mutation burden (TMB) and PD-L1 were high expression. Therefore, the patient received pembrolizumab combined with anlotinib treatment. After 15 cycles of treatment, the tumor significantly shrank with no tumor activity. The evaluation of tumor efficacy is partial response (PR). During the treatment period, she experienced one-degree thyroid-stimulating hormone elevation and two-degree hand-foot syndrome. Pembrolizumab and anlotinib was continued for two years as a maintenance treatment. The patient had a good quality of life and no disease progression was observed. Currently, the patient is still alive without tumor progression and has overall survival exceeding 45 months and toxic side effects were tolerable.

Conclusions

Combining ICIs and anti-angiogenic targeted therapy has brought new hope in treating advanced PSC. Additionally, TMB and PD-L1 expression could be potential predictive biomarkers of the efficacy in advanced PSC with immunotherapy.

Anlotinib combined with pembrolizumab as first-line treatment for advanced pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma: a case report and literature review

Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is an uncommon variant of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), known for its unfavorable prognosis. Previous studies have elucidated that PSC generally exhibits a significant expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), an elevated tumor mutation burden, and marked vascular invasion. These factors imply the possible effectiveness of treatments like immunotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy. The subject of this case was a 65-year-old male diagnosed with advanced PSC, characterized by high PD-L1 expression and devoid of known driver gene mutations. Owing to the restrictions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic, the patient initially underwent home-based treatment with anlotinib, which led to symptomatic improvement after a single treatment cycle. Subsequent hospitalization allowed for the administration of anlotinib plus Pembrolizumab, resulting in a partial response. Radiotherapy was necessitated due to local disease progression. But after 15 cycles of treatment with Pembrolizumab, hyperprogression was observed. The patient's overall survival spanned 14 months, with no evident adverse reactions to the medications. Genomic analysis revealed potential associations between treatment efficacy and mutations in the TP53, NF1, and MET genes. This case underscores the effectiveness and safety of a first-line treatment regimen combining pan-target anti-angiogenic therapy (anlotinib) with anti-tumor immunotherapy.

Eribulin combined with antiangiogenic agents in women with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: a retrospective multicenter study

Background

The relative lack of specifically targeted agents for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) makes the need for new agents or combination therapies to maximize clinical benefit while reducing toxicity critical.

Objectives

To retrospectively analyze the efficacy and safety of eribulin combined with antiangiogenic drugs in the treatment of Chinese women with HER2-negative MBC.

Methods

A total of 85 consecutive MBC patients with HER2-negative who were treated with eribulin + antiangiogenic agents between October 2020 and April 2023 in four institutions were retrospectively included in this study. Patients received eribulin 1.4 mg/m2 (day 1 and 8) plus bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg (day 1, 64 patients) or anlotinib 10 mg daily (day 1-14, 16 patients) or apatinib 250 mg daily (5 patients) on a 21-day cycle until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS), according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid tumors (RECIST) 1.1. Secondary end-points included toxicities, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and overall survival (OS). Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.

Results

The study included 85 HER2-negative MBC patients, with 41 patients (48.2%) in the first to second line group and 44 patients (51.8%) in the greater than or equal to third line group. The median age was 54.0 years. Thirty patients in the first to second line group and 14 patients in the greater than or equal to third line group had triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The ORR and DCR were 34.1% (29/85) and 75.3% (64/85). The median PFS (mPFS) of total population was 6.0 months (95% CI: 4.3-7.7), and median OS (mOS) was immature. The mPFS was 7.7 and 4.3 months in the first to second and greater than or equal to third line treatment (p = 0.003), respectively. TNBC patients in first to second line therapy showed a significantly longer PFS (6.5 months versus 2.0 months, p = 0.021) compared to greater than or equal to third line. The incidences of cardiovascular toxicity were 29.4% in grades 1-2 and no grades 3-4. Hematologic toxicity (leukopenia and neutropenia) was the most common grade ⩾3 AEs, and AEs were more common in patients in greater than or equal to third line.

Conclusion

The results suggest that eribulin combined with antiangiogenic therapy has a meaningful clinical activity and an acceptable safety profile in HER2-negative MBC.

A Retrospective Study of Anlotinib Combined with Anti-PD-1 Inhibitors in the 2nd or Later-Line Treatment of Advanced Solid Tumors

Objective

To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with anti-PD-1 inhibitors in the 2nd or later-line treatment of advanced solid tumors.

Patients and Methods

A total of 63 patients with advanced solid tumors who had failed or could not endure the adverse reactions after receiving first-line or more systematic treatment in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from March 2019 to April 2023 were treated with anlotinib Hydrochloride capsule combined with anti-PD-1 inhibitors. The efficacy and adverse reactions were evaluated according to RECIST1.1 and NCICTC4.0 standards.

Results

The percentage of overall response rate of 63 patients during the combination administration indicated that complete response was 1.6% (n=1), partial response was 23.8% (n=15), stable disease was 39.7% (n=25) and progressive disease was 34.9% (n=22), yielding objective response rate (ORR) of 25.4% and disease control rate (DCR) of 65.1%. Furthermore, the median PFS of 63 patients with advanced solid tumors was 7 months and the median OS was not reached, and the median follow-up time is 4.5 months. In subgroup analysis, there was no significant difference in PFS between first-line, second-line, third-line and above (p=0.631); there was no significant difference in PFS between PD-1 positive patients and PD-1 negative patients (p=0.094); there was no significant difference in PFS between patients who had previously used anti-PD-1 inhibitors and patients who had not used before (p=0.204). The most common adverse reactions were hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, and fatigue, with an incidence of 28.4% (18/63), 25.6% (14/63), and 25.6% (14/63), respectively. Most of the adverse reactions were grade 1-2, and there were no grade 4 adverse reactions.

Conclusion

Anlotinib combined with anti-PD-1 inhibitors demonstrated promising efficacy and tolerable safety for patients with advanced solid tumors in the 2nd or later-line treatment.

Safety and Efficacy of Anlotinib Hydrochloride Plus Temozolomide in Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma

PURPOSE

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly vascularized tumor with few treatment options after disease recurrence. Here, we report the efficacy and safety of anlotinib hydrochloride plus temozolomide in patients with recurrent GBM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with first definite postsurgical progression of histologically confirmed GBM preceded by standard radiotherapy and temozolomide chemotherapy were eligible for inclusion. All patients received temozolomide (150-200 mg/m2, orally, every day (QD) d1-5/4 wk) and anlotinib (10 mg, orally, QD, d1-14/3 wk) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate by the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were enrolled between May 2020 and July 2021, with a median age of 55 (range 27-68) years old. According to the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria, tumor response occurred in 17 patients, of which 9 patients had a complete response, and the objective response rate was 81.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 62.6-99.3]. The disease control rate was 95.2% (95% CI, 76.2-99.9), with three additional patients achieving a stable disease without tumor progression. The median PFS was 7.3 months (95% CI, 4.9-9.7), and the 6-month PFS rate was 61.9% (95% CI, 39.3-84.6). The median overall survival was 16.9 months (95% CI, 7.8-26.0). The most common adverse events were leukocytopenia (66.7%), thrombocytopenia (38.1%), and hypertriglyceridemia (38.1%). Five patients had nine grade 3 adverse events, with a 23.8% incidence rate. Two patients discontinued therapy due to ischemic stroke (grade 3) and wound dehiscence (grade 1), respectively. No grade 4 or treatment-related deaths occurred in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Anlotinib combined with temozolomide is efficacious and tolerated in patients with recurrent GBM.

Anlotinib as a maintenance treatment for advanced soft tissue sarcoma after first-line chemotherapy (ALTER-S006): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial

Background

No standard maintenance treatment has been obtained to prolong the response duration of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) after first-line chemotherapy. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib as a maintenance treatment after chemotherapy in STS.

Methods

In this multicentre, open-label, single-arm phase 2 trial, patients with advanced STS who achieved partial response or stable disease after first-line anthracycline-based chemotherapy were enrolled between April 2019 and January 2022. All patients received anlotinib as a maintenance treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) of anlotinib maintenance treatment. Other endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03890068.

Findings

At the data cut-off date (August 8, 2022), 49 patients were enrolled, including 17 with liposarcoma (35%) and 15 with leiomyosarcoma (31%). After a median follow-up of 17.1 months (IQR 9.0-27.2), the median PFS from the beginning of maintenance treatment was 9.1 months (95% CI 5.7-12.5), and the median OS was not reached, and the 1-year OS rate for anlotinib maintenance treatment was 98.0%. The best ORR and DCR were 16% (8/49, 95% CI 7-30) and 94% (46/49, 95% CI 83-99), respectively. Most of the treatment-related adverse events were grade 1-2. Of the grade 3-4 adverse events, the most common were hypertension (10%) and hand-foot syndrome reaction (6%).

Interpretation

Postchemotherapy maintenance treatment with anlotinib exhibits promising efficacy and tolerable toxicity in patients with advanced STS.

Funding

Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd., the National Key Research and Development Program of China, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Retrospective review of safety and efficacy of anlotinib in advanced osteosarcoma with metastases after failure of standard multimodal therapy

AIM

To study the safety and efficacy of anlotinib, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in the treatment of advanced osteosarcoma (OSS) with metastases.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied patients with advanced OSS and metastases who received anlotinib treatment in our hospital from June 2018 to April 2020. All patients had received standard multimodal therapies, before taking anlotinib. Therapeutic doses of anlotinib were 12 mg for adults and 10 mg for children and adolescents once a day for 2 consecutive weeks, followed by a week of withdrawal. This 3-week cycle of treatment was continued until the tumor progressed rapidly or the patients failed to tolerate the side effects. Adverse drug reactions were recorded, and therapeutic efficacy was evaluated based on progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

The median PFS was 9.8 ± .9 months, and the 6- and 10-month PFS rates were 73% and 33%, respectively. The median OS was 11.4 ± .6 months. No patients achieved complete response. After 6 months of treatment, the DCR and ORR were 80% and 13%, respectively. No drug-related deaths or Grade 4 adverse events occurred in the patients. Five patients (33%) had Grade 3 adverse events. The most common drug-related adverse events were hand-food syndrome, fatigue, high blood pressure, anorexia, and pneumothorax.

CONCLUSIONS

Anlotinib had a modest therapeutic effect in patients with advanced OSS after the failure of standard treatment. The adverse events were mostly tolerable or relieved after treatment.

Current status and future of anti-angiogenic drugs in lung cancer

Lung cancer, as a malignant tumor with both high incidence and mortality in China, is one of the major causes of death in our population and one of the major public health problems in China. Effective treatment of lung cancer is a major public health task for all human beings. Angiogenesis plays an important role in the development of tumor, not only as a basic condition for tumor growth, but also as a significant factor to promote tumor metastasis. Therefore, anti-angiogenesis has become a vital means to inhibit tumor development, and anti-angiogenic drugs can rebalance pro- and anti-angiogenic factors to inhibit tumor cells. This article reviews the mechanism of blood vessel formation in tumor tissues and the mechanism of action of different anti-angiogenic drugs, the combination therapy of anti-angiogenic drugs and other anti-tumor drugs, and the mechanism of anti-angiogenic drug resistance.

PEG2000-PLA-based nanoscale polymeric micelles reduce paclitaxel-related toxicity in beagle dogs

Nanoplatform-based drug delivery plays an important role in clinical practice. Polymeric micellar (Pm) nanocarriers have been demonstrated to reduce the toxicity of paclitaxel in rats and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, the underlying toxicological profile needs to be further illustrated. Here, we used beagles as study subjects and sought to further observe the toxicological profile of polymeric micellar paclitaxel (Pm-Pac) via acute toxicity tests and short-term and long-term toxicity tests. The results from the acute toxicity test indicated that the lethal dose of Pm-Pac in beagles was 20-30 mg/kg, and the acute toxicity-targeted organs were the digestive system and immuno-haematopoietic system. The short-term toxicity test suggested that paclitaxel-induced toxicity (peripheral neuropathy toxicity, haemopoietic toxicity, heart system toxicity, and so on) in beagles can be reduced when paclitaxel is delivered via the Pm delivery system. The long-term toxicity test suggested that Pm-Pac can reduce haemopoietic toxicity in beagles. Collectively, this study provides novel insight into the toxicological profile of Pm-Pac in healthy beagles and provides a potential basis for promising clinical combination strategies in the future.

Sintilimab plus anlotinib as second- or third-line therapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor mutations: A prospective, single-arm, phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and uncommon EGFR alterations typically have worse treatment outcomes than patients with classically EGFR-mutated NSCLC. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of PD-1 blockade with sintilimab plus anti-angiogenic treatment with anlotinib in patients with NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR mutations.

METHODS

Patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR mutations after two previous treatments, including a platinum-based chemotherapy regimen and a targeted treatment (or chemotherapy only for patients harboring EGFR ex20ins), received sintilimab combined with anlotinib. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

At data cutoff (September 27, 2022), median follow-up was 22.3 months (range, 1.2-37.6). Among 21 enrolled patients, 12 had EGFR ex20ins and nine had other uncommon EGFR mutations such as L861Q, G719A, and G709X. Overall, eight patients (38.1%) achieved an objective response, and 18 (85.7%) achieved disease control. Median (95% CI) progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.0 (5.4-8.6) months, and median overall survival (OS) was 20.0 (15.6-24.4) months. The 12-month PFS rate (95% CI) was 22.2% (7.4-42.0), and the 12-month OS rate was 66.7% (42.5-82.5). Patients harboring EGFR ex20ins had similar ORR and PFS to those with other mutations. Six patients (28.6%) experienced grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs); hand-foot syndrome was the most common grade 3 TRAE (2 patients; 9.5%). No grade ≥4 TRAEs were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of sintilimab and anlotinib demonstrated durable efficacy and was generally well tolerated in patients with NSCLC and uncommon EGFR mutations who had received prior standard-of-care treatments. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04790409).

c-Kit Receptors as a Therapeutic Target in Cancer: Current Insights

c-Kit is a type III receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) that has an essential role in various biological functions including gametogenesis, melanogenesis, hematopoiesis, cell survival, and apoptosis. c-KIT aberrations, either overexpression or loss-of-function mutations, have been implicated in the pathogenesis and development of many cancers, including gastrointestinal stromal tumors, mastocytosis, acute myeloid leukemia, breast, thyroid, and colorectal cancer, making c-KIT an attractive molecular target for the treatment of cancers. Therefore, a lot of effort has been put into investigating the utility of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the management of c-KIT mutated tumors. This review of the literature illustrates the role of c-KIT mutations in many cancers, aiming to provide insights into the role of TKIs as a therapeutic option for cancer patients with c-KIT aberrations. In conclusion, c-KIT is implicated in different types of cancer, and it could be a successful molecular target; however, proper detection of the underlying mutation type is required before starting the appropriate personalized therapy.

Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib-Containing Regimens in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Study

Purpose

Anlotinib is widely used in the clinical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), alone or in combination with other anticancer drugs. The aim of this study was to investigate the real-world efficacy and safety of anlotinib-containing regimens.

Patients and Methods

Confirmed advanced NSCLC patients who had received anlotinib alone or in combination were enrolled. An overall analysis of the efficacy and safety of anlotinib was performed in all patients, and then subgroup analysis was used to further compare the efficacy between anlotinib monotherapy and combination therapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were ADR, ORR, and DCR.

Results

A total of 240 patients were included. The overall median PFS was 8.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.1-9.9 months). Anlotinib treatment regimens (monotherapy or combination therapy) and whether they received previous antiangiogenesis were associated with PFS. Anlotinib plus immunotherapy achieved longer PFS than anlotinib monotherapy (median PFS: 10.5 vs 6.5 months, p=0.007). Stratification analysis showed the PFS of anlotinib plus immunotherapy was significantly longer in male, adenocarcinoma, <=65 years old, patients stage IV, EGFR wild type, with extrathoracic metastasis, performance status scores ≥2, the first-line treatment, patients with a history of hypertension and no previous antiangiogenesis than anlotinib monotherapy. The median PFS of anlotinib plus chemotherapy, targeted therapy was slightly longer than anlotinib alone (respectively, 10.5 vs 6.5 months, p=0.095; 9.5 vs 6.5 months, p=0.177). Adverse reactions were mostly mild and acceptable, with hypertension being the most common.

Conclusion

Anlotinib is effective and tolerable in advanced NSCLC patients. Immunotherapy combination with anlotinib significantly improved PFS. The efficacy of anlotinib may be impaired by previous antiangiogenic therapy, which can be investigated in further studies.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus anlotinib vs. concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: An interim analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Despite the use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and concurrent chemotherapy (CCRT), the treatment of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) is not satisfactory. EGFR and VEGFR are highly expressed in 60-80% of patients with LA-NPC and this is associated with a poor prognosis, which suggests the potential effectiveness of an inhibitor targeting tumor angiogenesis for treating LA-NPC. The present study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of CCRT combined with anlotinib in patients with LA-NPC. The study involved patients with LA-NPC (stage III-IVA) from four institutions in Guangxi, China. Patients were randomized to receive CCRT + anlotinib (n=36) or CCRT alone (n=37). Acute toxicity and short-term efficacy were evaluated. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were leucopenia [10 (27.7%) vs. 8 (21.6%)], neutropenia [6 (16.7%) vs. 5 (13.5%)] and mucositis [13 (36.1%) vs. 11 (29.7%)] in the CCRT + anlotinib vs. CCRT cohort but there were no significant differences between the two cohorts (P=0.54, P=0.70 and P=0.56, respectively). Two patients (5.6%) displayed grade 1/2 hemorrhage in the CCRT + anlotinib cohort. No patient displayed grade 3/4 hemorrhages or adverse event-associated deaths in any cohort. Complete response rates in the CCRT + anlotinib arm at 1 week and 3 and 6 months post-radiotherapy were 60.0, 91.4, and 97.1%, respectively, compared with 40.5, 81.1 and 91.9% in the CCRT arm but there was no significant difference (P=0.10, P=0.35 and P=0.65, respectively). This interim analysis of the ongoing trial showed that administration of CCRT + anlotinib has acceptable toxicity profiles, good compliance and promising results in patients with LA-NPC. A larger study cohort and a longer follow-up period are needed to confirm therapeutic effectiveness and late toxicity.

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib-based chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic anaplastic thyroid carcinoma

PURPOSE

Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) is one of the most lethal malignancies with no effective treatment. In this study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of anlotinib-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy for ATC.

METHODS

Locally advanced or metastatic (LA/M) ATC patients who never received antitumor treatment of any sort were eligible for this study. The patients received 2-6 cycles anlotinib12mg on days 1-14 per 21 days. Chemotherapy regimens consisted of paclitaxel, capecitabine, or paclitaxel plus carboplatin/capecitabine. The end points including Objective Response Rate (ORR), Disease Control Rate (DCR), Progression-Free Survival (PFS), and Disease Specification Survival (DCS) were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 25 patients were enrolled. 1 patient achieved a Complete Response (CR) and 14 patients achieved Partial Response (PR). The best ORR was 60.0%, and the DCR was 88.0%. The median PFS was 25.1 weeks, and the median DCS was 96.0 weeks. Approximately 56% (14 patients) had at least one Adverse Event (AE) of any grade. Most AEs were well tolerated. The most common AEs was palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (28.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Anlotinib-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy is a safe and effective intervention for the treatment of LA/M ATC patients.

Autophagic blockade potentiates anlotinib-mediated ferroptosis in anaplastic thyroid cancer

Anlotinib-mediated angiogenic remodeling was delineated in various tumors. Meanwhile, we previously showed that anlotinib inhibited tumor angiogenesis in anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC). However, the potential role of anlotinib on cell lethality in ATC remains an enigma. Herein, we found that anlotinib inhibited the viability, proliferation, and migration of KHM-5M, C643, and 8505C cells in a dose-dependently manner. Under anlotinib treatment, PANoptosis (pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis) markers were not changed; however, ferroptosis targets (transferrin, HO-1, FTH1, FTL, and GPX4) were significantly downregulated. ROS levels also increased in a concentration-dependent manner after anlotinib treatment in KHM-5M, C643, and 8505C cells. In addition, protective autophagy was activated in response to anlotinib, and autophagic blockade potentiated anlotinib-mediated ferroptosis and antitumor effects in vitro and in vivo. Our new discovery identified autophagy-ferroptosis signaling pathway which provides mechanistic insight into anlotinib-mediated cell death, and synergistic combination therapy may help develop new ATC treatment strategies.

International expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer complicated by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Background

Lung cancer combined by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (LC-COPD) is a common comorbidity and their interaction with each other poses significant clinical challenges. However, there is a lack of well-established consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of LC-COPD.

Methods

A panel of experts, comprising specialists in oncology, respiratory medicine, radiology, interventional medicine, and thoracic surgery, was convened. The panel was presented with a comprehensive review of the current evidence pertaining to LC-COPD. After thorough discussions, the panel reached a consensus on 17 recommendations with over 70% agreement in voting to enhance the management of LC-COPD and optimize the care of these patients.

Results

The 17 statements focused on pathogenic mechanisms (n=2), general strategies (n=4), and clinical application in COPD (n=2) and lung cancer (n=9) were developed and modified. These statements provide guidance on early screening and treatment selection of LC-COPD, the interplay of lung cancer and COPD on treatment, and considerations during treatment. This consensus also emphasizes patient-centered and personalized treatment in the management of LC-COPD.

Conclusions

The consensus highlights the need for concurrent treatment for both lung cancer and COPD in LC-COPD patients, while being mindful of the mutual influence of the two conditions on treatment and monitoring for adverse reactions.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of anlotinib as a third-line or further treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China

Background

The health expenditure on treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is enormous, especially in third-line or further therapy. Cost-effectiveness analysis for the treatment of advanced NSCLC is particularly important. Anlotinib has been approved by the China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) for the third-line or further treatment of advanced NSCLC. The price of anlotinib in China fell in 2022. Thus, this study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of anlotinib in the third-line or further treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC based on the newest price from the Chinese health-care system perspective.

Methods

A Markov model was developed to compare the lifetime costs and effectiveness of anlotinib and a placebo in the third-line or further treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC based on outcome data from the ALTER 0303 phase-3 randomized clinical trial, which included 437 patients with advanced NSCLC and investigated the efficacy of anlotinib. The lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the model uncertainty.

Results

Anlotinib provided an additional 0.1161 QALYs compared to the placebo. The corresponding incremental cost was ¥22,729. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of anlotinib compared to the placebo was ¥195,768 per QALY. From the perspective of the Chinese health-care system, anlotinib was found to be cost-effective compared to the placebo in the third-line or further treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of ¥242,928 per QALY. Moreover, 1-way sensitivity analysis found that the results were sensitive to the utility of progressive disease (PD). The lower this parameter was, the higher the probability of ICER for anlotinib not being cost-effective. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curves showed that the base-case analysis results were relatively stable.

Conclusions

Considering the clinical efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of anlotinib, it may be a valuable third-line or further treatment for advanced NSCLC in China.

Anlotinib affects systemic lipid metabolism and induces lipid accumulation in human lung cancer cells

BACKGROUND

Anlotinib has demonstrated encouraging clinical outcomes in the treatment of lung cancer, soft tissue sarcoma and thyroid carcinoma. Several clinical studies have shown a relationship between anlotinib treatment and the occurrence of hyperlipidemia. The fundamental mechanisms, however, are still largely unclear. Here, the effect of anlotinib on lipid metabolism in an animal model and human cancer cells was evaluated and the role of lipid metabolism in the antitumor efficacy of anlotinib was investigated.

METHODS

The C57BL/6 J mouse model as well as A549 and H460 human lung cancer cell lines were used to examine the impact of anlotinib on lipid metabolism both in vivo and in vitro. Levels of triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and total cholesterol in serum or cell samples were determined using assay kits. The expression levels of crucial genes and proteins involved in lipid metabolism were measured by quantitative RT-PCR and Western blotting. Furthermore, exogenous LDL and knockdown of low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) were used in H460 cells to investigate the relevance of lipid metabolism in the anticancer efficacy of anlotinib.

RESULTS

Anlotinib caused hyperlipidemia in C57BL/6 J mice, possibly by downregulating hepatic LDLR-mediated uptake of LDL cholesterol. AMP-activated protein kinase and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition may also be involved. Additionally, anlotinib enhanced sterol response element binding protein 1/2 nuclear accumulation as well as upregulated LDLR expression in A549 and H460 cells, which may be attributable to intracellular lipid accumulation. Knockdown of LDLR reduced intracellular cholesterol content, but interestingly, anlotinib significantly improved intracellular cholesterol accumulation in LDLR-knockdown cells. Both exogenous LDL and LDLR knockdown decreased the sensitivity of cells to anlotinib.

CONCLUSIONS

Anlotinib modulates host lipid metabolism through multiple pathways. Anlotinib also exerts a significant impact on lipid metabolism in cancer cells by regulating key transcription factors and metabolic enzymes. In addition, these findings suggest lipid metabolism is implicated in anlotinib sensitivity.

A MRI-based radiomics model for predicting the response to anlotinb combined with temozolomide in recurrent malignant glioma patients

OBJECTIVE

Anlotinib is a multitarget anti-angiogenic drug that combined with temozolomide (TMZ) can effectively prolongs the overall survival (OS) of recurrent malignant glioma(rMG),but some patients do not respond to anlotinib combined with TMZ. These patients were associated with a worse prognosis and lack effective identification methods. Therefore, it is necessary to differentiate patients who may have good response to anlotinb in combination with TMZ from those who are not, in order to provide personalized targeted therapies.

METHODS

Fifty three rMG patients (42 in training cohort and 11 in testing cohort) receiving anlotinib combined with TMZ were enrolled. A total of 3668 radiomics features were extracted from the recurrent MRI images. Radiomics features are reduced and filtered by hypothesis testing and Least Absolute Shrinkage And Selection (LASSO) regression. Eight machine learning models construct the radiomics model, and then screen out the optimal model. The performance of the model was assessed by its discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness with validation.

RESULTS

Fifty three patients with rMG were enrolled in our study. Thirty four patients displayed effective treatment response, showed a higher survival benefits than non-response group, the median progression-free survival(PFS) was 8.53 months versus 5.33 months (p = 0.06) and the median OS was 19.9 months and 7.33 months (p = 0.029), respectively. Three radiomics features were incorporated into the model construction as final variables after LASSO regression analysis. In testing cohort, Logistic Regression (LR) model has the best performance with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.93 compared with other models, which can effectively predict the response of rMG patients to anlotinib in combination with TMZ. The calibration curve confirmed the agreement between the observed actual and prediction probability. Within the reasonable threshold probability range (0.38-0.88), the radiomics model shows good clinical utility.

CONCLUSIONS

The above-described radiomics model performed well, which can serve as a clinical tool for individualized prediction of the response to anlotinb combined with TMZ in rMG patients.

Efficacy and safety of fluzoparib combined with anlotinib in extensive stage small cell lung cancer after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy: a multi-center, single-arm prospective phase II clinical study (STAMP study)

BACKGROUND

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive and lethal malignancy that accounts for 10-15% of lung cancers, and it is generally divided into limited and extensive stage. The standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) is still platinum-based chemotherapy and as maintenance therapy scheme. Although most parts of patients experience a significant tumor response to first-line therapy, the disease recurs invariably. Anlotinib hydrochloride, a novel oral multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has significant inhibitory activity against angiogenesis-related kinases, such as VEGFR, FGFR, PDGFR, and c-Kit kinase associated with tumor cell proliferation. Fluzoparib is a type of inhibitor of poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP, including PARPl, PARP2 and PARP3). Previous studies have shown that Fluzoparib has a strong inhibitory effect on PARP1 activity at the molecular and cellular levels.

METHODS

This is a multi-center, prospective, single-arm phase II clinical study. A total of 50 ES-SCLC patients who experienced disease progression after first-line standard platinum-based chemotherapy with/without immune checkpoint inhibitors scheme, or within 6 months after the completion of treatment will be recruited. Those who had prior treatment with any PARP inhibitor or antiangiogenic agent includes anlotinib, bevacizumab, sorafenib, and thalidomide are excluded. Eligible patients will receive oral anlotinib 8 mg once daily and oral fluzoparib 150 mg twice daily until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR).

DISCUSSION

The addition of fluzoparib to anlotinib is expected to increase the clinical benefit in ES-SCLC patients after platinum-based chemotherapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study protocol was prospectively registered on June 17, 2021.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov Identifier: NCT04933175 .

Anlotinib plus icotinib as a potential treatment option for EGFR-mutated advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer with concurrent mutations: final analysis of the prospective phase 2, multicenter ALTER-L004 study

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and concurrent mutations have a poor prognosis. This study aimed to examine anlotinib plus icotinib as a first-line treatment option for advanced NSCLC carrying EGFR mutation with or without concurrent mutations.

METHODS

This phase 2, single-arm, multicenter trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03736837) was performed at five hospitals in China from December 2018 to November 2020. Non-squamous NSCLC cases with EGFR-sensitizing mutations were treated with anlotinib and icotinib. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity.

RESULTS

Sixty participants were enrolled, including 31 (52%) and 29 (48%) with concurrent mutations and pathogenic concurrent mutations, respectively. The median follow-up was 26.9 (range, 15.0-38.9) months. ORR and DCR were 68.5% and 98.2%, respectively. Median PFS was 15.1 (95%CI: 12.6-17.6) months which met the primary endpoint, median DoR was 13.5 (95%CI: 10.0-17.1) months, and median OS was 30.0 (95%CI: 25.5-34.5) months. Median PFS and OS in patients with pathogenic concurrent mutations were 15.6 (95%CI: 12.5-18.7) months and not reached (95%CI: 17.46 months to not reached), respectively. All patients experienced TRAEs, including 26 (43%) and 1 (1.7%) who had grade ≥ 3 and serious treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).

CONCLUSIONS

Anlotinib combined with icotinib was effective and well-tolerated as a first-line treatment option for EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC with or without concurrent mutations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03736837.

Safety and efficacy of anlotinib hydrochloride capsules in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicenter, real-world study

Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of anlotinib hydrochloride capsules in stage III-IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: NSCLC patients received anlotinib monotherapy or combination therapy. The primary end point was adverse reactions during anlotinib treatment and the secondary end point was progression-free survival. Results: During anlotinib treatement, 41.85% (167/399) of patients experienced adverse reactions, and the monotherapy group had a lower incidence than the combination group (36.89 vs 49.68%; p = 0.012). The median progression-free survival of patients in the monotherapy group was significantly lower than that in the combination group (5 vs 6 months; p = 0.0119). Conclusion: Compared with anlotinib monotherapy, combination therapy resulted in longer PFS and a higher incidence of adverse reactions in patients with NSCLC.