Axillary lymph node dissection for intraductal breast carcinoma--is it indicated?

Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast is a heterogeneous group of lesions with diverse malignant potential. It is the most rapidly growing subgroup in the breast cancer family; it is projected that more than 39,000 new cases will be diagnosed in the United States during 1999. Most new cases are nonpalpable and are discovered mammographically. Treatment is controversial and ranges from excision only, to excision with radiation therapy, to mastectomy. Genetic changes routinely precede morphologic evidence of malignant transformation. Medicine must learn how to recognize these genetic changes, exploit them, and in the future, prevent them.

Scintimammographic findings of in situ ductal breast carcinoma in a double-phase study with Tc-99m(V) DMSA and Tc-99m MIBI value of Tc-99m(V) DMSA

The authors present a case of in situ ductal carcinoma of the breast (DCIS) with no associated mass in a 46-year-old woman examined with Tc-99m MIBI and Tc-99m(V) DMSA scans, which were acquired in separate sessions 10 minutes and 60 minutes after injection. Histologic analysis revealed a small (<1 cm) infiltrating ductal carcinoma located within the DCIS. Mammography showed a cluster of microcalcifications on a very dense parenchymal background. Tc-99m(V) DMSA was characterized as positive for DCIS, especially in the delayed image. Tc-99m MIBI failed to identify the lesions previously noted. In conclusion, Tc-99m(V) DMSA scintimammography seems to have an advantage and could improve the detection of nonpalpable in situ breast carcinomas.

Sentinel lymph node mapping in early-stage breast cancer: technical issues and results with vital blue dye mapping and radioguided surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Axillary lymph node status is the most important prognostic factor in patients with operable breast cancer. Recent studies have demonstrated the possibility of identifying the sentinel lymph node (sN) as a reliable predictor of axillary lymph node status in both cutaneous melanoma and breast cancer. Sentinel lymph node identification proved feasible by either peritumoral dye injection (Patent Blue-V) or radiodetection, with identification rates of 65-97% and 92-98%, respectively. However, some important issues need further definition, namely (a) optimization of the technique for intraoperative detection of the sN, (b) predictive value of the sN with regard to axillary lymph node status, and (c) reliability of intraoperative histology of the sN. We reviewed our experience in sN detection in patients with stage I-II breast cancer to assess the feasibility and accuracy of lymphatic mapping, by vital blue dye or radioguided surgery, and sN histology as a predictor of axillary lymph node status.

METHODS

Two groups of patients (55 and 48) were recruited between May 1996 and May 1997 and between October 1997 and February 1998; the patients of the first series underwent vital blue dye lymphatic mapping only, whereas those of the second series had a combined approach with both vital blue dye mapping and radioguided detection of the sN.

RESULTS

In the first set of patients, the sN was identified in 36/55 patients (65.4%); sN histology predicted axillary lymph node status with a 77% sensitivity (10/13), a 100% specificity (23/23), an 88.5% negative predictive value (23/26), and an overall 91.5% accuracy (33/36). The sN was the quasi-elective site of lymph node metastases because in clinically N0 patients nodal involvement was 20-fold more likely at histology in sN than in non-sN (30% and 1.5%, respectively). In the second set of patients, 49 lymphadenectomies were performed because 1 patient had bilateral breast cancer; the sN was identified in 45/49 lymphadenectomies (92%). The sN was intraoperatively negative at frozen-section examination in 33 cases, and final histology confirmed the absence of metastases in 31/33 cases (94%), whereas in 2 cases (6%) micrometastases only were detected. Final histology of the sN predicted axillary lymph node status with an 87.5% sensitivity (14/16), a 100% specificity (29/29), a 93.5% negative predictive value (29/31), and an overall 95.5% accuracy (43/45).

CONCLUSIONS

Sentinel lymphadenectomy can be better accomplished when both mapping techniques (vital blue dye and radioguided surgery) are used. In this group of patients, agreement of intraoperative histology of the sN with the final diagnosis was 94%, and sN histology accurately predicted axillary lymph node status in 43/45 lymphadenectomy specimens (95.5%) in which an sN was identified.

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast: evolving perspectives

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is an early, localized stage of carcinoma in the process of multistep breast carcinogenesis. The incidence of DCIS is increasing, mainly due to screening mammography, which results in diagnosing the disease in an increasing proportion of asymptomatic patients. Consequently, clinicians are being confronted with growing numbers of women who present with DCIS of the breast; thus, the concepts of managing such patients are assuming greater importance. The most common presentation is calcifications on mammography. DCIS is a biologically and morphologically heterogeneous disease. If left untreated, a significant proportion of these tumours will evolve into invasive cancer. However, when appropriately treated, the prognosis of DCIS is excellent. Optimal management of DCIS remains controversial. The goal in the treatment of patients with DCIS is to control local disease and prevent subsequent development of invasive cancer. For several decades, total mastectomy was the treatment of choice for DCIS and it should still be considered the standard of care, to which more conservative forms of treatment must be compared. Mastectomy is associated with a risk for chest wall recurrence of approximately 1%. Axillary lymph node dissection is not routinely recommended in the management of DCIS. However, mastectomy probably represents overtreatment in a substantial number of patients, especially those with small, mammographically detected lesions. Local excision alone has been suggested in carefully selected patients, whilst the rest of the patients undergoing breast-conservation surgery should be treated with breast irradiation. There is evidence that breast-conservation therapy is an effective option in the management of selected patients with DCIS. The use of radiotherapy after lumpectomy significantly decreases the rate of recurrence. Nuclear grade, presence of comedo necrosis, and margin involvement are the most commonly used predictors of the likelihood of recurrence. There is no role for adjuvant chemotherapy in the management of this disease. The role of tamoxifen in the treatment of DCIS is not clearly defined; tamoxifen should be given only in patients enrolled in clinical trials. Following breast-conservation therapy, about 50% of the tumours recur as invasive cancer. Most patients with recurrent disease can be treated effectively, usually by salvage mastectomy, but also in selected cases by breast-conservation therapy.

Long term follow-up of women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery: the effect of age

BACKGROUND

Although in recent years there has been a dramatic increase in both the incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and breast-conserving therapy for patients who have this disease, the optimal treatment for these patients remains controversial. Most data regarding outcomes have come from small, retrospective studies, with little data published from prospective, randomized studies. This study investigates the effects of age, postoperative breast irradiation, and other factors on local relapse free survival after breast-conserving surgery for women with DCIS in a large, single-institution series.

METHODS

A review was performed of all patients with DCIS who underwent breast-conserving surgery at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center from 1978 through 1990. Of the 171 cases identified, data on follow-up and radiation therapy were available for 157. All available pathology slides (132 of 157) were rereviewed to determine histologic subtype, nuclear grade, presence of necrosis, and microscopic tumor size. Sixty-five patients (41%) received postoperative radiation therapy; selection criteria evolved over the time period. The median follow-up was 74 months.

RESULTS

Factors that were significantly (P< or =0.05) associated with a lower recurrence rate were older age, noncomedo subtype, lower nuclear grade, negative margins, and postoperative radiation therapy. The 6-year actuarial recurrence rate was 9.6% for patients who received postoperative radiation therapy and 20.7% for patients who had excision only (P = 0.05). Comparison of patients of ages > or =70, 40-69, and <40 years revealed a significantly lower risk of recurrence with increasing age. Actuarial 6-year local relapse rates were 10.8%, 14.0%, and 47.2%, respectively (P = 0.047). A benefit from radiation therapy was suggested for each age group. There was no statistically significant correlation between age group and any histologic factor examined. In multivariate analysis, only margin status was statistically significant (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to margin status, pathologic factors, and the use of radiation therapy, age is another factor that should be considered in assessing the risk of local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery for patients with DCIS.

Management of ductal carcinoma in situ

The dramatic increase in the incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast has made it imperative for all clinicians to develop a better understanding of this disease. Although this preinvasive form of breast cancer is not life-threatening, treatment options may include mastectomy, breast-conserving surgery, radiotherapy, or tamoxifen. Current treatment modalities may be overly aggressive because many cases of DCIS may not recur or progress to invasive cancer. Until we are better able to identify those patients at low risk for progression, it is unlikely that current treatment will change. The adequate understanding of risk assessment is fundamental to the treatment planning for DCIS, and physicians are encouraged to include patients in the decision-making process.

Initial experience in a community hospital with sentinel lymph node mapping and biopsy for evaluation of axillary lymph node status in palpable invasive breast cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To determine the sentinel node detection rate and the accuracy with which the sentinel node histology reflects that of the axilla in a series of patients with palpable invasive breast cancer.

METHODS

Forty-four patients with clinically node-negative palpable invasive T1 or T2 breast tumors underwent sentinel node biopsy using isosulfan blue dye, followed immediately by either local excision of the primary lesion with standard axillary lymph node dissection or modified radical mastectomy. All surgeries were performed at Northwest Hospital, Seattle, Washington, between January 1996 and October 1997.

RESULTS

The sentinel node was successfully identified in 73% of the patients (32/44). The frequency of sentinel node detection was greater for tumors in the outer quadrants than the inner quadrants (z-test, P < 0.001). Of the 32 patients in whom a sentinel node was identified, 10 (31%) had histologically positive sentinel nodes: 5 (16%) by frozen section, 2 additional patients (6%) after permanent hematoxalin-eosin (H&E) stained sections, and the remaining 3 (9%) after immunohistochemical stains for cytokeratins when the FS and permanent H&E-stained sections were benign. Twenty patients had benign axilla. The sentinel node was falsely negative in 2 patients, yielding an accuracy of 93.8%, sensitivity of 83.3%, and negative predictive value of 91%.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphatic mapping is technically feasible for patients with small (T1 or T2) palpable invasive breast tumors. The sentinel node can be reliably identified in the majority of these patients, and its histology reflects that of the axilla with a high degree of accuracy. Immunohistochemical stains and permanent H&E-stained sections of the sentinel node increased the test's ability to correctly identify axillary metastases. Improving this sensitivity remains a primary goal, however, if benign sentinel node histology is to be used as a criterion to preclude axillary dissection.

Implementation of new surgical technology: outcome measures for lymphatic mapping of breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Recent advances in technology and the subsequent development of minimally invasive surgical techniques have heralded a new era in the surgical treatment of breast cancer. The dilemma of how to train surgeons in new technologies requires teaching, certification, and outcomes reporting in a non-threatening and non-economically damaging manner. This study examines 700 cases of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for breast cancer and documents surgeon-specific and institution-specific learning curves.

METHODS

Seven hundred cases of lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy were examined. All procedures were performed using a combination of vital blue dye and radiolabeled sulfur colloid. Learning curves were generated for each surgeon as a plot of failure rate versus number of cases.

RESULTS

Examination of the learning curves in this study demonstrates similar characteristics. Following a high initial failure rate, there is a rapid decrease after the first twenty cases. The learning curve, representing the mean of the five surgeons' experience, indicates that 23 cases and 53 cases are required to achieve success rates of 90% and 95%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The initial reports regarding lymphatic mapping combined with this experience of 700 cases confirm the presence of a significant learning curve. Although this procedure may have an inherent failure rate, it is important to identify those factors that are under the control of the surgeon and, therefore, subject to improvement. We believe that these data provide surgeons performing lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy with a new paradigm for assessing their skill and adequacy of training.

The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy are new techniques that accurately provide crucial staging information while inflicting far less morbidity than complete axillary dissection. As these techniques continue to gain acceptance, issues such as adequacy of training, certification, and outcomes measures become increasingly important. The purpose of this paper is to report the initial lymphatic mapping experience at the H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute and to provide a detailed description of the technical aspects of lymphatic mapping.

STUDY DESIGN

From April 1994 to April 1998, 700 patients with newly diagnosed breast cancers underwent an IRB-approved prospective trial of lymphatic mapping using a combination of Lymphazurin (USSC, Norwalk, CT) blue dye and filtered technetium 99m-labeled sulfur-colloid. Failure of the procedure was defined as the inability to detect an SLN by either radiocolloid uptake within a lymph node by the gamma probe or the inability to visualize blue staining of a lymph node. Learning curves were then generated as the failure rate versus serial number of patients for each of the 5 surgeons involved in this study.

RESULTS

The SLN was identified in 665 of 700 patients (95.0%). A total of 1,348 SLNs were successfully removed, of which 238 (17.7%) were positive for metastatic disease in 176 of 665 patients (26.5%). In patients who underwent a complete axillary dissection after SLN biopsy, SLNs were identified in 173 of 186 patients (93.0%). Of the 173 patients, 53 patients (30.6%) had positive SLNs and 120 patients (69.4%) had negative SLNs. In the 120 patients with negative SLNs, one patient was found to have disease on complete dissection, for a false-negative rate of 0.83% (95% CI: 0.02%, 4.6%). A learning curve representing the mean of the 5 surgeons' experience indicates that on average 23 patients are required by an individual surgeon to achieve a 90% +/- 4.5% success rate and 53 patients are required to achieve a 95% +/- 2.3% success rate (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These data validate lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy as indispensable tools in the surgical treatment of breast cancer. With adequate multidisciplinary training, these techniques can be readily implemented at institutions treating breast cancer.

Prognostic factors in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: results of a retrospective study of 575 cases. The Association for Research in Oncologic Gynecology

OBJECTIVE

Conservative treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast exposes patients to the risk of infiltrating recurrence which can lead to metastasis. The primary purposes of this retrospective study were to evaluate diagnostic and therapeutic methods over a 10-year period and to validate prognostic factors. This information should greatly improve patient selection for conservative treatment or mastectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

A multi-institutional data base including 575 patients treated between 1983 and 1993 was established by combining data from 16 French institutions. Survival at 5 and 7 years was studied as a function of various prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Recurrence-free survival at 7 years was 0.96 after modified radical mastectomy and 0.83 after breast-conserving treatment and radiotherapy (P=0.003). Metastasis-free survival at 7 years was 0.99 after modified radical mastectomy and 0.94 after breast-conserving treatment and radiotherapy (not significant). No factor was predictive of local recurrence after mastectomy. Clinical stage was the only factor significantly correlated with metastasis after mastectomy. Recurrence-free survival after breast-conserving treatment with radiotherapy was significantly lower for patients with comedo carcinoma, multifocal lesions, or unclear resection margins, regardless of whether the histological type was comedo or non-comedo carcinoma. Metastasis-free survival was significantly lower for patients with multifocal lesions and for patients with unclear margins after excision of comedo carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast-conserving treatment with radiotherapy is a valid alternative to mastectomy. Patients must be selected carefully on the basis of morphological criteria. Swift gains in therapeutic outcome can be obtained by stressing quality control at each stage of diagnosis and treatment.

Lymphatic mapping in breast cancer

The most accurate predictor of survival in breast cancer is the presence or absence of lymph node metastases. Lymphatic mapping with sentinel node biopsy is a new technique that provides more accurate nodal staging compared with routine histology for women with breast cancer, but without the morbidity of a complete lymph node dissection. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a more conservative approach to the axilla that requires close collaboration from the surgical team, nuclear medicine, and pathology. National trials are investigating the clinical relevance of the upstaging that occurs with a more intense examination of the SLN. As is the case with breast preservation as a viable alternative to mastectomy for the definitive treatment of the primary node, selective lymphadenectomy has the ability to decrease morbidity without compromising patient care.

Hypothesis and practice: are there several types of treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast?

Currently, we approach DCIS based on its morphology rather than its etiology. However, morphologically normal-appearing tissue surrounding areas of DCIS may reveal losses of heterozygosity similar to the primary tumor (Lakhani et al. 1995; Stratton et al. 1995; Radford et al. 1995; Fujii et al. 1996). In all likelihood, genetic changes precede morphologic evidence of malignant transformation. We in medicine must learn how to recognize these genetic changes, exploit them, and, in the future, prevent them. DCIS is a lesion in which the complete malignant phenotype of unlimited growth, angiogenesis, genomic elasticity, invasion, and metastasis has not been fully expressed. With sufficient time, most noninvasive lesions will learn how to invade and metastasize. We must learn how to prevent this.

Axillary clearance in operable breast cancer: still a necessity?

Complete axillary dissection, as part of radical mastectomy, was the standard of care for the first three-quarters of this century. Long-term follow-up of these patients showed substantial cure rates for positive-node patients before systemic therapy was available, indicating a therapeutic value to nodal dissection. There was also good control of the axilla; axillary recurrence after removal of positive nodes was quite low. Even today, in patients with positive nodes, complete axillary clearance as part of a modified radical mastectomy or a breast conservation approach with lumpectomy leads to control of the axilla and complete axillary staging, allowing medical oncologists to tailor their systemic treatment to the total number of nodes involved. Today, due to a combination of factors including patient awareness and the ability of mammography to detect smaller lesions, many women present with small cancers that carry a much lower risk of axillary involvement. Whereas a complete dissection is indicated for patients with clinically involved nodes, a level I-II dissection is the standard in most centers for patients with clinically negative nodes. In those patients with very small (T1a, T1b) cancers, the role of sentinel lymphadenectomy is being explored; it may spare these patients the morbidity of complete axillary dissection.

Sentinel lymphadenectomy: a safe answer to less axillary surgery?

Lymphatic mapping techniques have the potential of changing the standard of surgical care of breast cancer patients. This paper reports a prospective study documenting the safety and efficacy of sentinel lymph node biopsy in 167 breast cancer patients and reviews the world literature on the procedure.

METHODS

One hundred sixty-seven patients with newly diagnosed breast cancers underwent a prospective trial of intra-operative lymphatic mapping using a combination of vital blue dye and filtered technetium-labeled sulfur colloid. A sentinel lymph node (SLN) was defined as a blue node and/or "hot" node with a 10/1 ex-vivo gamma-probe ratio of SLN to non-SLN. All SLN were bi-valved, step-sectioned, and examined with routine H&E stains and immunohistochemical stains for cytokeratin. Cytokeratin-positive SLN were defined as any SLN with a defined cluster of positive staining cells which could be confirmed histologically on H&E sections. Finally, a review of the worldwide data was undertaken using a uniform analytical method to compare the rates of sensitivity, diagnostic accuracy, and false negatives of SLN mapping.

RESULTS

In 167 patients, 337 SLN were harvested, for an average of 2.01 SLN/patient. Fifty-two (31.1%) of the patients had metastasis in the SLN. In the 115 patients with negative SLN, 1 was found to have tumor in higher axillary nodes, for a false negative rate of 0.88%. Fifty-nine (37.8%) of the patients were diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration, 89 (53.3%) by excisional biopsy, and 19 (11.4%) by core biopsy. Positive SLN were identified in 1/17 (5.9%) patients with DCIS. Metastasis was found in 33/115 (28.7%) of the patients with infiltrating ductal tumors and in 11/19 (57.9%) of the patients with infiltrating lobular tumors. Positive SLN were identified in 7/16 (43.7%) of the patients with mixed cellularity tumors. Metastasis in the SLN was detected in 7/55 (12.7%) of the 59 patients with T1a-T1b tumors and in 21/58 (36.2%) of the patients with T1c tumors. Positive SLN were found in 17/30 (56.7%) of the patients with T2 tumors and in 6/7 (85.7%) of the patients with T3 tumors. A literature review of 731 patients (including this study) demonstrates a sensitivity rate of 95% and a diagnostic accuracy rate of 98%. The overall false negative rate is 3.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that SLN biopsy is a highly sensitive and accurate method of predicting axillary nodal status. It is a reproducible technique that is easily learned. The future addition of more sensitive methods such as PCR evaluation of nodal involvement may reduce the need for widespread use of adjuvant chemotherapy with its high cost and attendant morbidity and mortality. We believe that this technique will eventually become the standard of care in the treatment of breast cancer, particularly for T1 and T2 lesions and perhaps also for high-grade DCIS tumors.

Sentinel lymph node mapping opens a new perspective in the surgical management of early-stage breast cancer: a combined approach with vital blue dye lymphatic mapping and radioguided surgery

Recent studies have demonstrated the possibility of identifying the sentinel lymph node (sN) as a reliable predictor of axillary lymph node status in both cutaneous melanoma and breast cancer. However, some important issues need further definition: (1) optimization of the technique for intraoperative detection of the sN; (2) predictive value of the sN as regards axillary lymph node status, and (3) reliability of intraoperative histology of the sN. We report our experience in sN mapping in patients with Stage I-II breast cancer, with the aim of assessing: (1) the feasibility of lymphatic mapping with a combined approach (vital blue dye lymphatic mapping and radioguided surgery); (2) the agreement of the intraoperative histologic examination of the sN, by means of hematoxylin and eosin staining with final histology, and (3) the accuracy of sN histology as a predictor of axillary lymph node status.

Clinicopathologic analysis of microscopically invasive breast carcinoma

Breast biopsy or mastectomy cases having diagnoses of carcinoma in situ with "microinvasion," "minimal invasion," "focal invasion," or "suggestive of invasion" were reviewed and all histologically identified foci of invasive disease from each case were measured using an ocular micrometer. Cases in which any single focus of invasion was greater than 5 mm or the added size of separate invasive foci exceeded 10 mm were excluded, resulting in a study group of 75 patients. Invasive neoplasm was present in the initial biopsy in 69 of 75 cases (92%); however, residual invasive neoplasm was found in the subsequent lumpectomy/mastectomy from 14 of these (20%). In 59% of cases, two or more histologically separate foci of invasion were identified. Invasive foci consisted of isolated cells or cell clusters, each less than 1 mm (microfocal invasion), in 33% of cases. In 12 cases, the sum of individual invasive foci was 5 to 10 mm. Axillary lymph nodes (LN) from 5 of 69 patients (7%) contained metastatic carcinoma (four cases, one LN positive; one case, two LN positive). The cumulative sizes of all invasive foci in the LN-positive group were microfocal invasion (one case), 0.6 mm (one case), 1.1 mm, 2.5 mm, and 5.8 mm. The difference in frequency of axillary node metastasis between tumors with microfocal and measurable invasion (4.3% v 8.6%) was not statistically significant. Follow-up data were available on 55 cases (mean interval, 66.1 months). One (node-negative) patient had duct carcinoma in situ recurrence in the same breast 4 years after initial treatment. Another (with unknown node status) developed an axillary lymph node metastasis 13 months after initial treatment (96% disease-free survival). We conclude that microscopic stromal invasion in breast carcinoma, at least in the setting of significant in situ component, is often initiated from multiple foci. Patients with microscopically invasive breast carcinoma have a small but significant risk of axillary metastases, although a highly favorable survival.

Mammary ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion

BACKGROUND

The natural history of patients with intraductal carcinoma (DCIS) and microinvasion is poorly defined, and the clinical management of these patients, with particular reference to management of the axilla, has been controversial. Previous studies of this lesion have used varied and/or arbitrary criteria for the evaluation of microinvasion.

METHODS

Thirty-eight DCIS lesions with microinvasion (n=29) or probable microinvasion (n=9), diagnosed during the period 1980-1996, were retrospectively analyzed after cases not treated with mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection were excluded. Microinvasion was defined as a single focus of invasive carcinoma < or = 2 mm or up to 3 foci of invasion, each < or =1 mm in greatest dimension.

RESULTS

The patients were all females with a mean age of 56.4 years. DCIS was of comedo (n=31) or papillary (n=7) subtype. Microinvasion was often associated with an altered, desmoplastic stroma (55%) or a lymphocytic infiltrate (39%). The foci of microinvasion ranged from 0.25 to 1.75 mm (mean, 0.6 mm), with an aggregate mean size of 1.1 mm (range, 0.25-2.25 mm). Foci of microinvasion, ranging from 1 to 3 (mean, 1.7), were adjacent to DCIS in 95.3% of cases. The extent of DCIS did not correlate with the number of foci of microinvasion. Axillary lymph node dissections yielded a mean of 19.3 lymph nodes (range, 7-38), and all lymph nodes were negative for metastasis. None of 33 patients, followed for a mean of 7.5 years (range, 1.0-14.4 years), developed local recurrence or metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

The cases of microinvasive carcinoma examined in this study, as defined above, were not associated with axillary lymph node metastases and appeared to be associated with an excellent prognosis. Further study is indicated to determine the appropriate management and long term prognosis of patients with this lesion.

Axillary node dissection in ductal carcinoma in situ

Intraductal carcinoma of the breast has become a well-defined entity that has been more frequently diagnosed since the introduction of mammography. For many years, the usual treatment has been mastectomy, often with axillary lymph node dissection. Concurrent with documentation that breast conservation treatment has been effective for many invasive breast cancers, such treatment has been introduced for noninvasive breast cancers (ductal carcinoma in situ and lobular cancer in situ). However, there is no basis for axillary dissection because tumor cells are contained by the basement membrane and should not metastasize. In this study, 107 axillary dissections were carried out, with an average of 20 nodes identified, and a single metastasis was identified.

A Multidisciplinary Approach to Locoregional Management of the Axilla for Primary Operable Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND: Lymph node metastasis is the single most important factor in assessing breast cancer prognosis and planning systemic therapy. However, lymph node dissection portends significant morbidity, with little or no therapeutic benefit if the nodes prove to be negative for cancer. METHODS: The authors review indications for avoiding axillary dissection, and they analyze the results from lower-level axillary lymphadenectomy together with the morbidity from full axillary dissection. RESULTS: Limited level I dissection depends on surgical technique and limits prognostic information. Three approaches have evolved to identify the sentinel node in breast cancer: perilesional breast injection of radiocolloid alone, blue dye alone, or a combination of radiocolloid and blue dye. These techniques provide high diagnostic accuracy, few false-negative results, and less morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of axillary status is critical to current breast cancer management and cannot be foregone in the preponderance of patients with advanced breast cancer. Results from lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy are highly encouraging.

The Role of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Breast Cancer Management

Although it is generally accepted that axillary dissection provides no survival advantage in patients with breast cancer, it is commonly regarded as a reliable method of assessing nodal status and treating regional disease. However, it is time to consider eliminating routine axillary dissection in patients who are clinically node-negative. A sentinel lymph node biopsy may assess axillary nodal status while obviating a full axillary dissection. At present, axillary dissection remains the standard approach for the surgical management of all patients with invasive carcinoma of the breast, regardless of tumor size or patient age, though it is unnecessary for patients with small intraductal carcinomas.

Assessment of surgical operations for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

The choice of surgical procedure for the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains clinically based. A meta-analysis was used to synthesize the results of 24 published clinical studies. Partial breast tissue excision appears to be as efficacious as mastectomy for the treatment of DCIS of the breast.

Ten-year results of treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast with conservative surgery and radiotherapy

The optimal treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast has not yet been established. The effectiveness of adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy after conservative surgery is debated. Few data are available in Italy on the combined treatment. A collaborative multi-institutional study on this issue in 10 radiation oncology departments of the north-east of Italy was conducted. One hundred and thirty nine women with DCIS of the breast were treated between 1980 and 1990. Age ranged between 28 and 88 years (median 50 years). Surgical procedures were: quadrantectomy in 108, lumpectomy in 22 and wide excision in 9 cases. The axilla was surgically staged in 97 cases: all the patients were node-negative. Radiation therapy was delivered with 60Co units (78%) or 6 MV linear accelerators (22%) for a median total dose to the entire breast of 50 Gy (mean 49.48 Gy; range 45-60 Gy). The tumour bed was boosted in 109 cases (78%) at a dose of 4-30 Gy (median 10 Gy) for a minimum tumour dose of 58 Gy. Median follow-up was 81 months. Thirteen local recurrences were recorded, 7 intraductal and 6 invasive. All recurrent patients had a salvage mastectomy and are alive and free of disease. Actuarial overall, cause-specific and recurrence-free survival at 10 years are of 93%, 100% and 86%, respectively. The results of this retrospective multicentric study substantiate the favourable data reported in the literature and confirm the efficacy of the breast-conserving treatment of DCIS employing conservative surgery and adjuvant radiation therapy.

Axillary lymphadenectomy: a diagnostic and therapeutic procedure

Axillary dissection for primary operable cancer follows the basic tenants of surgical oncology and achieves the stated goals. Local control is excellent with failure rates in the 0-2% range. Long-term and disease-free survival is improved with axillary dissection. It is often stated that axillary dissection is not required for the smallest of lesions, but the 15% risk of axillary disease with the T1A lesion would suggest otherwise. Axillary sampling would not achieve the stated goals because of the high probability of retained, potentially resectable disease in the node positive group. Axillary recurrence is associated with an unacceptably high morbidity and mortality. Although the survival is similar in the three treatment groups of NSABP B-04, the inordinately high systemic failure rate with axillary recurrence would suggest that more aggressive local control could prevent many of these failures. After all, long-term survival free of disease is reported in many series even in patients with multiple involved nodes. Axillary dissection also generates the most accurate prognostic variable upon which further therapeutic interventions are predicated. At present there is no other diagnostic or therapeutic approach that achieves all of these goals. In summary the value of the axillary dissection is to provide accurate prognostic information as well as excellent local control and to improve the survival rate in the node positive group. It is hoped that in the future a diagnostic test such as PET scanning or sentinel node mapping may predict those patients with a clear axilla and therefore not require an axillary dissection. Finally, there has yet to be a primary operable carcinoma that benefits from preservation of potentially fully resectable disease.

Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast--current management

The management options in the treatment of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast are reviewed. Results of treatment by mastectomy, wide local excision, and local surgery followed by radiotherapy are analysed. Factors which incline the surgeon towards recommending mastectomy and the conditions which should be fulfilled for breast conservation are discussed.

Ductal carcinoma in situ. Part 2: Treatment

Several dilemmas exist when treating a patient with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): the high rate of inter-observer variation for pathologists who must diagnose these tumours; the potential for over- and under-treatment; and the uncertainty about the best way to inform a patient who must often make a decision between breast conservation and mastectomy. Mastectomy is nearly 100% curative, is expedient, but may represent over-treatment for many women, particularly those with asymptomatic mammographically detected lesions. Axillary dissection is not recommended as a routine except for patients with lesions over 5 cm in whom the risk of micro-invasion and lymph node involvement increases. Conservative surgery (CS) alone is associated with a local recurrence rate of approximately 20%, and half of these recurrences (10% overall) are invasive, with a potential long-term cure rate of at least 90%. The addition of radiation to CS reduces the risk of local recurrence to approximately 10%, half of these recurrences (5%) are invasive for a potential long-term cure rate of 95%. Several randomized trials comparing CS with or without radiation therapy (RT) are in progress. The factors that increase the rate of local recurrence after CS alone for DCIS include close or involved margins, and the presence of necrosis or high-grade tumours. Patients with these features should have radiation therapy if breast conservation is preferred. Patients with low-grade tumours (without necrosis) up to 15 mm, with clear margins of at least 10 mm, who agree to be closely observed may be good candidates for CS alone. A critical review of the literature is presented.

Diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastases in patients with breast cancer

The diagnosis of axillary (AX) metastases remains a challenge in the management of breast cancer and is a subject of controversy. Clinical node staging clearly is limited in the assessment of AX lymph nodes. AX mammography, ultrasonography, and computed tomography (CT) do not provide histologic information. Although nuclear magnetic resonance imaging may have considerable value in the diagnosis of AX metastases, it does not detect micrometastases. The use of biologic markers in the assessment of AX metastases remains a subject of investigation. On the other hand, biopsy of selected AX nodes or tissue with examination of histology or cytology generally would not identify a significant percentage of patients with AX node involvement. Sentinel lymph node biopsy, however, might be potentially useful for assessing AX metastases, although it remains investigational. In order to simplify diagnosis and reduce morbidity and mortality, alternatives to AX dissection must be sought and imaging and staging modalities refined. We present a review of the literature pertaining to the diagnosis of AX metastases in patients with breast cancer and a discussion of some current areas of controversy.

Breast-conserving treatment: controversies and consensus

Although breast-conserving therapy (BCT) is an accepted alternative for the treatment of breast cancer, numerous controversies surround the selection criteria and the treatment details. A review of the literature revealed that patient selection is of critical importance. However, there is disagreement over the relative importance of some of the criteria for patient selection. A wide excision is preferable to a less complete excision (tumorectomy) or a more radical excision (quadrantectomy). Accurate assessment of surgical margins is important. The risk of local recurrence may be diminished if a re-excision is performed to obtain tumor-free margins. However, the suitability and practicality of the techniques used to assess the resection margins have been questioned. Radiotherapy is an integral part of BCT. Surgery alone remains an investigational approach. Axillary dissection remains a reliable method of assessing nodal status and treating regional disease.

Predicting axillary lymph node metastases in breast carcinoma patients

Routine axillary dissection is primarily used as a means of assessing prognosis to establish appropriate treatment plans for patients with primary breast carcinoma. However, axillary dissection offers no therapeutic benefit to node negative patients and patients may incur unnecessary morbidity, including mild to severe impairment of arm motion and lymphedema, as a result. This paper outlines a method of evaluating the probability of harbouring lymph node metastases at the time of initial surgery by assessment of tumour based parameters, in order to provide an objective basis for further selection of patients for treatment or investigation. The novel aspect of this study is the use of Maximum Entropy Estimation (MEE) to construct probabilistic models of the relationship between the risk factors and the outcome. Two hundred and seventeen patients with invasive breast carcinoma were studied. Surgical treatment included axillary clearance in all cases, so that the pathologic status of the nodes was known. Tumour size was found to be significantly correlated (P < 0.001) to the axillary lymph node status in the multivariate anlaysis with age (P = 0.089) and vascular invasion (P = 0.08) marginally correlated. Using the multivariate model constructed, 38 patients were predicted to have risk of nodal metastases lower than 20%, of these only 4 (10%) patients had lymph node metastases. A comparison with the Multivariate Logistic Regression (MLR) was carried out. It was found that the predictive quality of the MEE model was better than that of the MLR model. In view of the small sample size, further verification of this model is required in assessing its practical application to a larger population.

Intraoperative assessment of axillary lymph node metastases in operable breast cancer

The diagnostic value of intraoperative histologic examination of frozen sections of axillary lymph nodes was investigated in 243 patients with operable breast cancer. One to six hard or enlarged axillary nodes were sampled from the axillary pad which was derived from a partial axillary dissection (including level 1 and 2 nodes). Half of these nodes were histologically examined using frozen sections during surgery. After a total axillary dissection, both the axillary nodes in the partial axillary dissection and the nodes dissected at level 3 were histologically examined on permanent section. A mean of four nodes were sampled (range: 1 to 6). Axillary dissection yielded a mean of 22 nodes (range: 6 to 60). Axillary sampling detected the presence of metastases in 65 of 84 (77%) patients with positive axillary lymph nodes. In the patients in whom the axillary involvement was not identified by axillary sampling, however, the extent of axillary involvement was limited to levels 1 and 2. Therefore, a partial axillary dissection may be justified for patients in whom axillary involvement is not found on frozen section of nodes from axillary sampling, whereas a total axillary dissection should be performed for patients in whom axillary involvement is found by these procedures.

Controversies in the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ

In summary, certain subgroups of DCIS appear not to require radiation. Corroboration of these results from retrospective reviews and prospective trials is necessary to confirm the safety and efficacy of individualized treatment strategies. Even though the current standard of treatment is (1) lumpectomy with radiation therapy, (2) mastectomy, or (3) mastectomy with reconstruction, it is possible in the future to say that patients with low-grade DCIS (the exact criteria to be defined) may be eligible for breast conservation without radiation, and all patients with high-grade DCIS or perhaps low-grade DCIS with necrosis would be treated best by lumpectomy plus radiation. It is possible that a small subgroup of patients may be best treated by mastectomy, or perhaps, as the results of B-24 become available, by radiation therapy plus tamoxifen. The use of tumor markers such as c-erbB-2, cathepsin D, and NM 23 may help us to better define these subgroups, but much study is necessary before a definite treatment strategy is reached.

Treatment trends for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

BACKGROUND

As a result of clinical trial publications, breast conservation treatment has been increasingly used for invasive breast cancer. The patterns of care for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were analyzed for the years 1985, 1986, 1988, 1990, and 1991 to determine whether the same treatment principles had been applied to patients with non-invasive disease.

METHODS

Data submitted on 20,556 patients with DCIS during the 5 study years were analyzed with regard to basic demographics and treatment trends.

RESULTS

Breast-conserving surgery for DCIS increased from 20.9% in 1985 to 35.4% in 1991. Modified radical mastectomy remained constant at 42%. Axillary node surgery increased from 52% in 1985 to 58.5% in 1991. The use of radiation therapy for patients with partial mastectomy and no lymph node dissection ranges from 24.2% in 1990 to 37.7% in 1985, with 31.1% receiving radiation therapy in 1991. Patients undergoing lymph node dissection with partial mastectomy were more than twice as likely to receive postoperative radiation therapy than were patients without lymph node dissection.

CONCLUSIONS

Modified radical mastectomy remains the most common surgical procedure, despite the eligibility of many women for breast conservation treatment. As of 1991 the majority of women were still undergoing axillary lymph node surgery despite a node positivity rate of approximately 1%. Radiation therapy is significantly underused in patients with partial mastectomy, especially when no nodes were removed. Clinical trial results and professional education for DCIS treatment should change these trends.

Management of ductal carcinoma in situ

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is an early, localized stage of breast carcinoma that has an excellent prognosis when it is properly treated. The significant increase in the frequency of diagnosis of DCIS in recent years is the result of both better recognition of DCIS among pathologists and widespread use of screening mammography. Multicentricity, bilaterality and histologic subtype are important considerations in the management of this disease. The clinical presentation of DCIS is the presence of either a palpable mass or a mammographic abnormality, most frequently in the form of an area of microcalcifications. For several decades, total mastectomy was considered the appropriate treatment for DCIS, and it should still be considered the standard to which more conservative forms of treatment must be compared. Breast conservation surgery has been used with increasing frequency in the treatment of DCIS but the adequacy of this approach remains subject to controversy. Segmental mastectomy alone may be applied with caution in carefully selected patients, while the rest of the patients undergoing breast conservation surgery should be treated with breast irradiation. Axillary node dissection is generally considered unnecessary in the treatment of DCIS. There is no role for adjuvant chemotherapy in the management of this disease. The role of tamoxifen in the treatment of DCIS is not clearly defined and it should be given only to patients enrolled in clinical trials. Ongoing research should clarify the controversies surrounding DCIS and enable us to define the optimal management for this disease.