Combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy in advanced inoperable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The final report of a randomized trial

Re-irradiation with concomitant chemotherapy of unresectable recurrent head and neck cancer: a potentially curable disease

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to review the outcome following concomitant chemoradiation therapy in previously irradiated patients with locally or regionally recurrent or persistent head and neck cancer considered unresectable for cure.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We identified 45 patients treated between 1986 and 1993 with unresectable locally or regionally recurrent disease who were treated on one of four concomitant chemoradiotherapy phase I/II studies at the University of Chicago. All patients received hydroxyurea (HU), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and concomitant radiation therapy on an alternate week schedule (FHX). Cisplatin was added to FHX in three of the studies.

RESULTS

The overall survival, progression-free survival, and local/regional control at 5 years was 14.6%, 13.5% and 20%, respectively, in a cohort of patients whose disease is almost universally fatal. Fatal treatment related complications were observed in 5 (11%) of patients. Two of these complications were related to radiation therapy. Stepwise Cox regression analysis revealed that dose and protocol were significantly correlated with survival, progression-free survival and local/regional control. A direct correlation was observed with radiation dose and an inverse correlation was observed with the initial FHX dose escalation study. The 2-year survival was 35% in patients receiving over 58 Gy compared to 8% for those receiving less than 58 Gy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that aggressive re-irradiation with concomitant chemotherapy of recurrent head and neck cancer results in the cure of some patients with acceptable toxicity if tumoricidal doses are applied. These results are in contrast to historical series of chemotherapy alone which results in limited palliation of brief duration and almost no chance of cure. Thus, re-irradiation with concomitant chemotherapy should be further investigated as an alternative to chemotherapy alone in multi-center or cooperative group randomized trials.

Enhanced acute toxicity in oropharynx carcinoma treated with radiotherapy and concomitant cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C

The aim of this study was to establish the feasibility of giving concomitant radiotherapy and 3 cycles of chemotherapy with cisplatin (CDDP), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin C (MMC) in locally advanced inoperable oropharyngeal cancer. From March 1990 to September 1993, 27 male patients (mean age 55 years) were included in this study. 3 patients (11%) were T2N0, 19 (70%) T3 (T3N0: n = 9, T3N1: n = 1, T3N2: n = 5, T3N3: n = 4), and 5 (19%) T4 (T4N0: n = 1, T4N1: n = 1, T4N2: n = 2, T4N3: n = 1). All patients received conventional radiotherapy delivering 70 Gy in 35 fractions and 52 days, and three cycles of chemotherapy starting on day 1, 21 and 42 with CDDP 20 mg/m2 and 5-FU 400 mg/m2 day 1 to day 4, and MMC 10 mg/m2 day 1. With a mean follow-up of 34 months (17-59), 10 patients (37%) were alive and free of disease. Among the 17 other patients, 8 died of cancer. Crude locoregional control rate was 78%, and probability of local control at 1 and 2 years was 85 and 80%, respectively. One- and 2-year survival rates were 48 and 31%, respectively, for both overall and disease-free survival. Grade 3 or 4 mucositis occurred in 22 patients (81%); enteral feeding was necessary for 63%; mean weight loss was 5.7 kg. Grade > 2 thrombocytopenia occurred in 11 patients (41%), grade > 2 neutropenia in 8 patients (29%), grade > 2 anaemia in 4 patients (15%). Febrile neutropenia or aplasia occurred in 5 patients (19%). 2 patients (7%) died during treatment of haematological or infectious complications related to the treatment. Another patient died 1 month after treatment with grade 4 thrombocytopenia and septicaemia. In conclusion, a high complete response rate has been achieved with this concomitant chemo- and radiotherapy, but with severe digestive and haematological toxicity. Addition of MMC to 5-FU and CDDP might have been responsible for this increased toxicity. This therapeutic combination is therefore not routinely feasible.

Chemotherapy of squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck: the future is now

In 1996, there is an established role for chemotherapy in head and neck cancer. Patients with recurrent disease will be offered combination chemotherapy. In this setting, investigations of new drugs or combinations and the pursuit of concomitant chemo-reirradiation are of interest. In patients with locoregionally advanced disease, induction chemotherapy can be used with the goal of larynx preservation. In addition, a role for chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal cancer appears to be emerging with increased survival as therapeutic goal. The combination of cisplatin and 5-FU does not need to be tested further, however, a more definitive evaluation of a biochemically modulated PF regimen might be of interest. Furthermore, induction chemotherapy represents an ideal investigational tool in which to further evaluate the activity of several new drugs in head and neck cancer patients. Finally, concomitant chemoradiotherapy has resulted in increased survival in several randomized clinical studies. Given the poor outcome of standard radiotherapy in patients with unresectable disease, we favor the administration of concomitant chemoradiotherapy in this group of patients as a standard therapy. In our opinion, the use of radiation therapy alone in this group of patients should be restricted to patients with poor performance status or other high medical risks that render the administration of chemotherapy unadvisable. Finally, given the high incidence of second malignancies and general medical complications in cured head and neck cancer patients, studies of chemoprevention and good preventive medical care by a medical oncologist should be made available to all patients.

Head and neck cancer

This synthesis of the literature on radiotherapy for head and neck cancer is based on 424 scientific articles, including 3 meta-analyses, 38 randomized studies, 45 prospective studies, and 246 retrospective studies. These studies involve 79174 patients. The literature review shows that radiotherapy, either alone or in combination with surgery, plays an essential role in treating head and neck cancers. When tumors are localized, many tumor patients can be cured by radiotherapy alone and thereby maintain full organ function (1, 2). Current technical advancements in radiotherapy offer the potential for better local tumor control with lower morbidity (3). This, however, will require more sophisticated dose planning resources. To further improve treatment results for advanced tumors, other fractionation schedules, mainly hyperfractionation, should be introduced (5). This mainly increases the demands on staff resources for radiotherapy. The combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy should be subjected to further controlled studies involving a sufficiently large number of patients (4, 5). Interstitial treatment (in the hands of experienced radiotherapists) yields good results for selected cancers. The method should be more generally accessible in Sweden. Intraoperative radiotherapy should be targeted for further study and development.

Split hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy and concomitant cisplatin for locally advanced head and neck carcinomas: a preliminary report

PURPOSE

The feasibility and activity of an intensive chemoradiotherapeutic scheme for patients with locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancers were tested in a single institution Phase II pilot study.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between January 1990 and February 1992, 40 patients were entered into this trial. The treatment protocol consisted of split hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy (SHART), 1.6 Gy per fraction given twice per day to a total dose of 64-67.2 Gy for a total of 6 weeks with a 2-week gap, and cisplatin (20 mg/sqm/Days 1 to 5, in continuous perfusion) concomitantly.

RESULTS

All of the 40 patients are evaluable for response and survival. Toxicity was significant, but tolerable. A complete tumor response to this treatment was achieved by 37 patients (92.5%). With a minimal follow-up of 22 months (median 30 months) there have been 16 local relapses and 19 patients have died, 2 without tumor. The projected 2- and 3-year overall survival rates are 64% (confidence interval (CI) 95%, 49-79%) and 47%, respectively. The 2-year local control probability has been 56% (CI 95%, 39-73%).

CONCLUSION

This treatment obtains a high rate of complete responses with increased acute toxicity but tolerable late effects. Preliminary results are encouraging for laryngeal neoplasms. A longer follow-up is needed to evaluate the impact of this treatment on patient survival.

Alternating chemo-radiotherapy in bladder cancer: a conservative approach

PURPOSE

The aim of this Phase II study was to determine a bladder-sparing treatment in patients with invasive bladder cancer, allowing a better quality of life. Objectives were to test toxicity and disease-free and overall survival of patients given an alternated chemo-radiotherapy definitive treatment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Seventy-six patients with bladder cancer Stage T1G3 through T4 N0 M0 were entered in the same chemotherapy regimen (Cisplatin 20 mg/mq and 5-Fluorouracil 200 mg/mq daily for 5 days) alternated with different radiotherapy scheduling, the first 18 patients received two cycles of 20 Gy/10 fractions/12 days each; the second group of 58 patients received two cycles of 25 Gy/10 fractions/12 days each (the last 21 patients received Methotrexate 40 mg/mq instead of 5-Fluorouracil).

RESULTS

A clinical complete response was observed in 57 patients (81%), partial response in 7 patients (10%), and a nonresponse in 6 patients (9%). At a median follow-up of 45 months, 33 patients (47%) were alive and free of tumor. The 6-year overall survival and progression-free survival was 42% and 40%, respectively. Systemic side effects were mild, while a moderate or severe local toxicity was observed in 14 patients and 13 patients (about 20%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our conservative combination treatment allowed bladder-sparing in a high rate of patients and resulted in a survival comparable to that reported after radical cystectomy.

Head and neck cancer: present status and future prospects of adjuvant chemotherapy

For more than 15 years, active clinical research and continuing efforts in the field of CT in head and neck cancer have produced a modest but definite progress and achievements in this disease. We are a long way away from producing more definitive and acceptable results and higher cure rates in this disease. The achievements of systemic CT in patients with head and neck cancers are summarized in this review. Continuing efforts and investigation are needed to study the efficacy of systemic CT in patients with resectable head and neck cancer. We are continuing to investigate the best timing and sequence of CT as part of CMT and then the efficacy of such treatment in patients with resectable cancer. Efforts are underway to improve on the results in patients with NPC and patients with unresectable disease with the use of chemotherapy as part of CMT. Efforts are also underway to consolidate and improve on the results obtained with systemic CT to preserve laryngeal function. We strongly believe that with continuation of these serious efforts further achievement and impact can be obtained with systemic CT as part of other modalities in these patients.

Cisplatin as a radiation sensitizer in the treatment of advanced head and neck cancers. Results of a phase II study

BACKGROUND

Surgery and radiotherapy mainstays in the management of advanced head and neck cancer, although historically, only 20-30% of patients survive. Therefore, in an attempt to improve locoregional control and survival, a multimodal protocol using cisplatin as a radiosensitizer was implemented.

METHODS

Between 1984 and 1990, 68 patients with advanced head and neck cancer (Stages III and IV) were treated with a regimen consisting of an induction phase of 4500 cGy and two cycles of cisplatin followed by an eradicative phase of either radical surgery (Group A, 27 patients) or radical radiotherapy (Group B, 41 patients). The maintenance phase chemotherapy consisted of adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin after completion of locoregional treatment. Of the 68 patients, 19 had Stage III disease, and 49 had Stage IV; 21 had no regional lymph node metastases (N0), and 47 had regional lymph node metastases (N+).

RESULTS

The induction phase yielded a 26% (18 patients) complete response (CR) rate and a 57% (39 patients) partial response (PR) rate (response > 50%), yielding an overall response rate of 83%. Eleven patients (16%) had stable disease (ST) (i.e., < 50% response). The 2-year survival rates by initial treatment response for patients who had a CR, a PR, and stable disease were 53%, 56%, and 36%, respectively; for Groups A and B, 63% and 45%, respectively; for Stages III and IV, 68% and 43%, respectively; and for N0 and N+, 69% and 43%, respectively. In Group A, 14 of 27 patients (52%) had no viable tumor in the surgical specimen (i.e. had pathologic complete tumor clearance [CTC]); this subgroup had a 5-year survival rate of 58%. Ten patients (37%) who had gross total resection of tumor with negative margins but had tumor present in the specimen had a 5-year survival of 22%. In Group B, the 5-year survival rate was 43% for 27 patients who achieved CR after completion of radical radiotherapy (total tumor dose, 6480-7020 cGy). The 5-year survival rate of the 14 patients who had a PR and stable disease after radical radiotherapy and 3 patients whose resection was incomplete was 0%. The overall 2- and 5-year survival rates for all patients were 53% and 32%, respectively. Of 21 patients in whom treatment failed, most (90%) had a locoregional recurrence: 13 local recurrences (62%), 5 regional (24%), and 1 locoregional (5%). Two patients (10%) experienced failure at distant sites (the lung). Major treatment-related morbidity developed in two patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although induction chemotherapy-radiotherapy produces a high clinical response rate, this does not translate into improved survival compared with historical controls. A subgroup that showed complete tumor clearance (CTC or pathologic complete response) at surgery had an apparent improved survival and merits further study. Patient selection did not appear to be a factor for the CTC group, because the majority of patients in this group had partial responses to induction therapy, nodal disease and advanced tumor stage, and tumor presence in unfavorable sites.

Chemotherapy in head and neck cancer

Chemotherapy has been used for many years as a palliative approach to advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Regimens employed have slowly evolved during this time, and the combination of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil is still standard chemotherapy for such a tumour. However, clinical approaches to advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck are changing dramatically as physicians become increasingly familiar with multidisciplinary treatments. Integrating chemotherapy and radiotherapy, neo-adjuvant or adjuvant treatments and organ preservation are stimulating fields of investigation involving chemotherapy which definitely warrant further investigation.

Evidence-based recommendations against neoadjuvant chemotherapy for routine management of patients with squamous cell head and neck cancer

The objective of this study was to determine appropriate recommendations for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC). Published reports of randomized trials of neoadjuvant versus standard therapy in patients with stage III and stage IV HNC were identified by literature search. The overall trial results were analyzed using three pooling techniques: vote count, weighted median survival, and meta-analysis of published survival data. Excluded from analysis were articles on intra-arterial therapy, studies without a standard treatment control arm, studies that included adjuvant therapy, and abstracts. Twelve studies were evaluable for vote count, 11 for weighted median survival analysis, and 10 for quantitative meta-analysis. By vote count there was no observed survival difference in 7 trials, a trend favoring control in 3, a statistically significant difference favoring control in 1, and a trend favoring neoadjuvant therapy in 1. The weighted median survival was 20.9 months for control versus 20.0 months for neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with consistent trends for resectable and nonresectable disease and for chemotherapy combinations versus single agents. The common odds ratios for deaths at 12, 24, and 36 months were 1.12, 1.27, and 1.11, respectively, all in favor of control treatment. Data generated using rigorous methodological standards indicate that neoadjuvant chemotherapy should not be offered to patients with locally advanced HNC if improved survival is the outcome of interest. It is premature to recommend neoadjuvant chemotherapy to preserve organ function, although patients should be aware of this option and the limitations of the current data.

Evolving role of surgery after induction chemotherapy and primary site radiation in head and neck cancer

Chemotherapy, as preliminary treatment before surgery and/or radiation for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, is no longer novel. In prospective trials to date, however, multiple agent induction chemotherapy has yet to demonstrate the initial presumptive promise of improved rates of cure. As an alternate goal, there has emerged a renewed attentiveness toward limiting treatment morbidity, several strategies for which may be considered. Extirpative, often radical, surgery on the primary site of disease usually represents the most significant threat to life quality. Various ways of limiting surgical morbidity will be considered by way of introduction. The trends of head and neck cancer treatment over the decades, leading into the era of induction chemotherapy and refined radiation techniques, will be described. At the combined Dana-Farber/New England Deaconess Head and Neck Oncology Clinic, an experience with over 300 patients receiving induction chemotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer has been analyzed with an emphasis on the postulate of lessening the extent of surgery in appropriately selected patients. In a comparison between trials initiated in 1980 and 1987, improved complete response rates from 26 to 57% were documented. Survival rates were identical, but the use of planned primary site ablative surgery was decreased from 47 to 14%. While some increase in local failure has been noted in patients treated by primary site radiation alone, surgical salvage appeared to be more effective. The implication of these trends for patterns of failure and surgical salvage and data concerning the need for neck dissection in this group of patients will be briefly summarized. Other trials addressing organ-preservation strategies will also be referenced and the dichotomy between survival-based studies and morbidity-limiting studies illustrated. Independent trends in radiation technique as a potential substitute for traditional surgical practice will be reviewed.

Treatment of advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck with alternating chemotherapy and radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

For patients with advanced, unresectable squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck, radiotherapy is the standard treatment but has poor results. We therefore designed a randomized trial to determine whether alternating chemotherapy with radiotherapy would improve the survival of such patients.

METHODS

Patients in the trial had biopsy-confirmed unresectable, previously untreated Stage III or IV, squamous-cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, pharynx, or larynx. They were randomly assigned to chemotherapy consisting of four cycles of intravenous cisplatin (20 mg per square meter of body-surface area per day for five consecutive days) and fluorouracil (200 mg per square meter per day for five consecutive days) alternating with radiotherapy in three two-week courses (20 Gy per course; 2 Gy per day, five days per week), or to radiotherapy alone (up to 70 Gy; 2 Gy per day, five days per week).

RESULTS

The 80 patients given chemotherapy alternating with radiotherapy and the 77 given radiotherapy alone were comparable in terms of age, sex, performance status, disease stage, and site of the primary tumor. Complete responses were obtained in 42 percent of the patients in the combined-therapy group and 22 percent of those in the radiotherapy group (P = 0.037). The median survival was 16.5 months in the combined-therapy group and 11.7 months in the radiotherapy group (P less than 0.05); the 3-year survival was 41 percent and 23 percent, respectively. Severe mucositis occurred in 19 percent of the patients in the combined-therapy group and 18 percent of those in the radiotherapy group.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with advanced unresectable squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck, chemotherapy alternating with radiotherapy increases the median survival and doubles the probability of survival for three years as compared with radiotherapy alone. However, since local disease cannot be controlled in over half the patients who receive the combined treatment and since almost two thirds die within three years, further improvements in management are necessary.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin and continuous infusions of bleomycin and 5-fluorouracil for advanced head and neck cancer. The need for a new stratification for stage IV (M0) disease

A Phase II study of cisplatin (100 mg/m2 on day 1) and bleomycin (15 mg intravenous push day 1) followed by 5 days of continuous intravenous infusions of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (650 mg/m2/d) and bleomycin (16 mg/m2/d) repeated at 21-day intervals was performed in 54 previously untreated patients with nonmetastatic (M0), locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The aim of this study was to increase the complete response rate to chemotherapy and to identify prognostic factors that may influence local control and disease-free survival. From April 1986 until August 1988, 5 patients with Stage III and 49 with Stage IV (International Union Against Cancer-American Joint Committee on Cancer 1986 [UICC-AJCC]) disease received this regimen. Thirty (61%) patients with Stage IV disease had bulky nodal disease (9 N2c and 21 N3) and 29 (53%) had T4 primary lesions. The response rate was 59% (95% confidence interval, 47% to 71%) and the complete response rate to chemotherapy was 13% (95% confidence interval, 0% to 26%). The response rate was greatly influenced by tumoral volume and performance status (PS). The complete response rate to chemotherapy was 40% for patients with Stage III disease (2 of 5 patients) versus 10% for patients with Stage IV disease (5 of 49 patients; P = 0.02). The response rate for patients with Stage III disease was 100% (5 of 5 patients) versus 55% for patients with Stage IV disease (27 of 49 patients; P = 0.14). For patients with Stage IV bulky nodal disease (N2c-N3), the response rate was 43% (13 of 30 patients) and the complete response rate to chemotherapy was 3% (1 of 30 patients) versus 68% (13 of 19 patients; P = 0.13) and 21% (4 of 19 patients; P = 0.07), respectively, for patients with Stage IV less than N2b disease. The local control rate after definitive therapy was 100% for patients with Stage III disease, 70% (17 of 24 patients) for patients with Stage IV less than N2b disease, and 17% (5 of 30 patients) for patients with bulky nodal disease (P = 0.0005). As of February 1991, with a median follow-up time of 38 months (range, 30 to 53 months), 4 of 5 patients with Stage III disease and 7 of 19 patients with Stage IV less than N2b disease were alive with no evidence of disease (37%) versus 0 of 30 patients with bulky nodal disease (P = 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)