Earlier diagnosis of second primary melanoma confirms the benefits of patient education and routine postoperative follow-up

Follow-up in patients with localised primary cutaneous melanoma

Follow-up services for patients with localised cutaneous melanoma are widely discussed but there is no international consensus. Our aim was to discuss frequency and duration of follow-up, type of health professional involved, optimum intensity of routine investigation, and patients' satisfaction with follow-up. Searches of the published work were directed at publications between January, 1985, and February, 2004 on recurrences, subsequent primary melanoma, routine tests, and patients' satisfaction. In a selection of 72 articles, 2142 (6.6%) recurrences were reported, 62% of which were detected by the patients themselves. 2.6% of patients developed a subsequent primary melanoma. Most investigators do not support high-intensity routine follow-up investigations. Of the various follow-up investigations requested by physicians, only medical history and physical examination seem to be cost effective. Lymph-node sonography seems to be a promising method for detection, although survival benefit remains to be proven. Patients were found to be anxious about follow-up visits, although other research showed that provision of information to patients was much appreciated. Published work on the follow-up of patients with cutaneous melanoma has mainly been retrospective and descriptive. Recommendations can be given with only a low grade of evidence. For meaningful guidelines to be developed, prospective, high-quality methodological research is needed.

Family physician visits and early recognition of melanoma

BACKGROUND

Malignant melanoma is a deadly skin cancer with a rapidly-increasing incidence, mortality and public health burden. Thin melanomas are easily treated with good prognosis, while the thicker lesions have relatively poor survival. To broaden strategies for early recognition of melanoma, we investigated the relationship between primary care service and melanoma thickness at diagnosis.

METHODS

All 714 patients diagnosed with a primary malignant melanoma between January 1995 and December 1999 in Nova Scotia were included in the present study and linked to provincial physician billing databases to reveal the patients' use of family physician services prior to the diagnosis of melanoma. We examined the importance of physician use of services for tumour thickness using logistic regression while adjusting for potential confounders. Tumour thickness was dichotomized to thin and thick using 0.75 mm as a cutoff.

RESULTS

Patients who regularly visited their family physician (2 to 5 times during a two-year interval prior to diagnosis) were 66% (95% CI, 31-84) less likely to be diagnosed with thick melanoma as compared to patients who consulted their family physician less or not at all. Progression to thick tumours could have been reduced by 11.70% (95% CI, -1.33-25.77) if all patients had consulted their family physician at least once a year.

DISCUSSION

Increased awareness of the need for regular medical check-ups could reduce the public health burden of melanoma.

Impact of Melanoma Diagnosis on Sun-Awareness and Protection: Efficacy of Education Campaigns in a High-Risk Population

BACKGROUND

Malignant melanoma is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Sun-awareness campaigns increase public knowledge but may not translate into behavioral changes in practice, which is particularly alarming when reported for individuals in high-risk groups. In particular, patients diagnosed with melanoma are at increased risk of developing subsequent primary melanomas compared with the general population.

OBJECTIVES

The study was undertaken (1) to assess whether patients with known risk factors for developing melanoma had been exposed to preventative campaign messages prior to their diagnosis, (2) to quantify whether the diagnosis of melanoma changed sun-related attitudes and behavior, and (3) to assess the adequacy of sun-related advice given to patients with melanoma, as well as their compliance with the advice.

METHODS

Using an anonymous questionnaire, 217 patients previously diagnosed with melanoma were interviewed on the source and frequency of received sun-related advice, as well as on their knowledge, attitudes, and behavior toward sun protection before and after the diagnosis.

RESULTS

The number of patients who reported receiving sun-related advice after being diagnosed with melanoma increased by 36% (52% pre-vs. 88% postDiagnosis), with advice being given more frequently and more often by a physician (19% pre- vs. 49% postdiagnosis). Furthermore, sun-related attitudes and behavioral practices were positively altered. Yet, patients with known risk factors were not preferentially targeted for advice before their diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis of melanoma leads to increased sun-awareness and protection. While dermatologists should continue their efforts to promote and reinforce sun-awareness in patients with melanoma, additional emphasis on preventative targeting of high-risk individuals would be of marked benefit in decreasing the overall incidence of melanoma. Non-dermatologists, such as family physicians, can be key players in this preventative campaign, and can be educated to recognize and educate patients at risk, as well as direct them to be followed under dermatology care.

Views of UK melanoma patients on routine follow-up care

Although the need for melanoma follow-up is universally accepted, there is still much debate on the duration and frequency of appointments. The UK guidelines were revised in June 2002 to streamline melanoma follow-up. Following the change in protocol, some of our patients expressed concern at the shorter duration of follow-up. We therefore polled all our active melanoma patients to obtain their views on the outpatient clinics. In particular we asked whether they would be happy to have routine follow-up in a primary care setting. In conjunction with the department of psychology, a short questionnaire was devised assessing patient satisfaction and concerns about follow-up. This was sent to all active melanoma patients in our trust. Out of 304 eligible patients currently attending outpatients, 231 (76%) completed replies were received. Ninety-eight percent of respondents found the clinics to be useful. Twenty two and a half percent felt it was difficult to attend the clinic and this was mainly due to logistical problems, i.e. hospital car parking. The majority were reassured by the clinic visits and felt it was a chance to ask questions and check for new disease. Of the 12% of respondents who had a recurrence, 52% indicated that they had detected it themselves. Sixty percent of patients would be happy to consider routine follow-up with their GP, provided they were suitably experienced and trained. A survey of 50 local GP's found that 70% would be unhappy to monitor their patients. Patients want and benefit from follow-up. However, they are an increasing burden on outpatient clinics, given the increasing incidence of melanoma. GP follow-up may be appropriate for a small subgroup of patients. This combined with shared care and practice based clinical nurse specialists may be the way forward in melanoma follow-up.

Evaluation of extensive initial staging procedure in intermediate/high-risk melanoma patients

INTRODUCTION

Early diagnosis and treatment of metastases have been shown to improve overall survival of melanoma patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of extensive initial staging, including positron emission tomography (PET) scan on the management of melanoma patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-three patients with intermediate/poor prognosis primary melanoma benefited from complementary excision and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLB) after clinical and paraclinical staging (computed tomography, nuclear magnetic resonance and whole body fluorodeoxyglucose PET scan).

RESULTS

No systemic metastases were demonstrated, while the SLB procedure emphasized the presence of regional lymph node metastases in 10 patients as suggested by the PET scan in four patients (sensitivity of the PET scan 40%). These 10 patients with early diagnosed lymph node involvement benefited from early surgery and were included in adjuvant treatment protocols. A secondary primary cancer was fortuitously diagnosed and treated early in two patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The development of new adjuvant therapies and therapeutic procedures (specific and non-specific immunotherapy, gamma-knife radiosurgery, etc.) now raises the relevance of extensive staging in intermediate/poor prognosis melanoma patients. We confirm in our series that PET scan is not useful to detect micrometastasis and cannot replace SLB in initial regional staging. However, we show in our study that 12 of 43 patients were treated early or were included early in treatment protocols thanks to the extensive staging procedure. Nevertheless, it seems important to evaluate through larger prospective trials the real impact of these early diagnoses and new treatments on overall survival before defining new diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines.

High constant incidence rates of second cutaneous melanomas

The incidence of most epithelial cancers rises with a power of age. However, second breast cancers have a high constant incidence independent of age. The skin is one of the few other sites allowing examination of age incidence curves of second neoplasms of the same organ. We considered the risk of second primary cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) in a population-based series of 3,439 first CMM registered and followed-up between 1974 and 2003 in the Swiss Cantons of Vaud and Neuchâtel (about 786,000 inhabitants). A total of 43 cases of second CMM were observed vs. 9.3 expected, corresponding to a standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of 4.6. The SIR was 8.5 under age 50, 5.7 at age 50-59 and 3.5 at age 60 or over. At 20 years, the cumulative risk of second CMM was 5%. Age-specific incidence rates of second primary CMM did not vary across age groups 30-39 through 80+, ranging between 1 and 2.5 per 1,000 person-years. Thus, the risk of CMM is substantially increased in subjects diagnosed with a CMM, and the relative risk is greater at younger age and declines with advancing age. The high constant incidence curve of second CMM is compatible with the occurrence of a single mutational event in a population of susceptible individuals.

Geographic and Patient Variation in Receipt of Surveillance Procedures After Local Excision of Cutaneous Melanoma11Tables 4, 6, and appendix can be found at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/products/journals/suppmat/jid/jid22238/jid22238sm.htm

Little is known about variation in surveillance practices following the diagnosis of invasive melanoma. The objective of this study was to characterize geographic, patient, and tumor variation in the use of follow-up surveillance testing in patients with local or regional stage melanoma. A cohort of Medicare beneficiaries > or =65 y diagnosed with invasive melanoma during 1992 to 1996 living in a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry area was studied. Outpatient and inpatient Medicare claims 3 mo following diagnosis were examined for up to 2 y for surveillance procedures of interest. Use of chest X-ray, chest computed tomography scan, abdominal and/or pelvic computed tomography scan, abdominal ultrasound, head computed tomography scan, head magnetic resonance imaging, laboratory testing, and skin examinations were compared between patient groups and geographic regions. A total of 3389 patients were identified for the analysis. Surveillance testing was relatively common, ranging from 13% for abdominal ultrasound to 80% for laboratory testing. Follow-up skin examinations were performed in 70% to 90% of patients. The use of most surveillance procedures was associated (p<0.01) with younger age, male gender, regional stage tumors, and geographical area, with up to 2-fold differences observed. In contrast, there was much less variability in the receipt of skin examinations. Further studies are needed to determine the etiology and impact of such disparities, and the influence of surveillance procedures on morbidity and mortality.

Body site of cutaneous malignant melanoma--a study on patients with hereditary and multiple sporadic tumours

Individuals with an increased risk of developing cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) include members of kindreds with hereditary cutaneous malignant melanoma (HCMM) and patients who have already been treated for a CMM. Some of these patients develop multiple primary cutaneous malignant melanomas (MCMMs). Ultraviolet radiation is the main instigator of CMM. There are indications that patients in these high-risk groups react differently to sunlight than patients who develop a single sporadic CMM. The objectives of this study were to analyse tumour site in patients with HCMM and sporadic MCMM. Data on 2517 patients with 2608 CMMs from a population-based regional cancer registry were used. The new computer program EssDoll was used for the analyses of primary tumour sites. This software is able to analyse any chosen body area(s) with reference to the number of tumours arising there. When the site of the first and second tumours in patients with sporadic MCMM were analysed in a skin 'field division', there was a significant concordance with respect to site (P < 0.0001). In patients with MCMM, the second primary tumour was significantly thinner than the first (P = 0.001). Primary tumour sites in patients with HCMM were compared with those in patients with a single sporadic CMM. In HCMM we found significantly fewer tumours in the head and neck area and more on the trunk. These differences remained significant in two different body area models, even when stratified for age (P < 0.05). In conclusion, a site-concordance was noted for sporadic MCMM. This may be the result of a 'field effect'. Our results indicate that intermittent ultraviolet exposure may be of relatively greater importance than chronic exposure in HCMM.

Close monitoring and lifetime follow-up is optimal for patients with a history of melanoma

Malignant melanoma, a potentially lethal form of skin cancer, is becoming more common each year in the United States and worldwide. The cure rate, however, is also increasing due to better education, earlier detection, and more effective treatment. Thus, there are more melanoma survivors who are at risk for recurrence of melanoma and also a second primary. Because there are few prospective screening and surveillance results in the medical literature, recommendations for follow-up of melanoma survivors have been based on the natural history of the disease, physical examinations, laboratory tests, and radiologic evaluations.

Biomarkers in melanoma: staging, prognosis and detection of early metastases

Currently, melanoma remains a surgical disease since early detection and excision of thin melanomas offers the best chance of a cure. Despite intensive clinical investigation, no effective systemic therapies exist for metastatic melanoma. Sentinel lymph node biopsy has greatly aided the staging and prognostic evaluation of primary cutaneous melanoma, however, approximately a third of patients diagnosed with metastatic melanomas present without prior regional lymph node involvement. Additional prognostic biomarkers exist which help determine the risk of advanced melanoma but the accuracy for each current marker is less than 100%. A greater understanding of the biology of melanomas and the development of new methods to identify patients with early (subclinical) metastatic disease may allow for selective and more effective therapy for patients at-risk for advanced disease. In this paper, current and novel potentially more accurate biomarkers for the staging and prognostic evaluation of melanoma patients, and for the detection of subclinical metastases are reviewed.

Current concepts in the management of patients with melanoma

Melanoma is a significant health problem. Despite public education and free cancer screenings, the incidence and mortality of melanoma continues to rise; however, many currently diagnosed melanomas are thin lesions, suggesting that education and awareness is having an impact. In addition, there are still subsets of patients who need increased surveillance in order to increase their survival. Although large congenital nevi may be precursors of melanoma, small and medium congenital nevi have an insignificant risk for melanoma development. Large congenital nevi, which are axial in location, appear to be more likely to develop melanoma and are associated with melanocytosis and melanoma of the CNS, both of which portend a poor prognosis. Recently, the recommended margins of excision have become more conservative so that many of the surgical defects can be closed primarily. Lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node biopsy have replaced elective node dissections, thus decreasing the morbidity associated with the surgical management of melanoma. Although controversy still exists as to whether or not sentinel lymph node biopsy alters a patient's prognosis, it has been shown to be a powerful prognostic indicator. Although most melanomas are managed by routine surgical excision, other modalities are sometimes employed. For example, cryosurgery or radiation therapy may be indicated in the frail, elderly individual with a large facial lentigo maligna. Mohs surgery is the treatment of choice for head and neck melanomas and those located in areas where maximum preservation of tissue is required and for desmoplastic and acral lentiginous melanomas. Much more work remains in the area of adjuvant therapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. Dacarbazine remains the drug of choice in disseminated melanoma, but remissions are usually short lived. Interleukin and biochemotherapy has yielded good results but the percentage benefiting is small. Although high dose interferon increases disease-free and overall survival in some patients, it remains a controversial drug which is not easily tolerated. In the new staging system for melanoma, ulceration is second only to Breslow's thickness. In transit (satellite) lesions have also been included in this new system. The new system also recognizes that patients with only microscopic metastatic nodal disease fare better than patients with clinically enlarged metastatic nodes and that it is the number of nodes involved with metastases, not their size, that determines the patient's prognosis. Except for lesions <1mm thick, the Clark's level of invasion has been de-emphasized.