Antifibrinolytic drugs for acute traumatic injury

International normalized ratio as a predictor of mortality in trauma patients in India

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhage is the second leading cause of death in trauma patients preceded only by traumatic brain injury. But hemorrhagic shock is the most common cause of preventable death within 6 hours of admission. Traumatic coagulopathy is a hypocoagulable state that occurs in the most severely injured. International normalized ratio (INR) and its relationship with trauma mortality have not been studied specifically. This study aimed to establish a predictive value of INR for trauma-related mortality.

METHODS

A total of 99 trauma patients aged 18-70 years were included in the study. Their INR was determined and patient progression was followed up till death/discharge. According to previous retrospective studies, the cutoff value for INR in our study was kept at 1.5.

RESULTS

The total mortality rate of the patients was 16.16% (16/99). The mean INR was 1.45 with a SD of 1.35. INR was deranged in a total of 14 patients (14.14%). Of these patients, 11 died (78.57%) and 3 survived. INR was deranged in 11 (68.75%) of the 16 patients who died, but 5 deaths (31.25%) had normal INR values. The sensitivity of INR was 69% (95%CI 41%-88%) and the specificity 96% (95%CI 90%-99%). The diagnostic accuracy of INR was 92% (95%CI 85%-96%). Positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 79% (95%CI 49%-95%) and 94% (95%CI 87%-98%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that INR is a good predictor of mortality in trauma patients.

Neurotrauma

Neurotrauma continues to be a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Prevention of primary neurologic injury is a critical public health concern. Early and thorough assessment of the patient with neurotrauma with high index of suspicion of traumatic spinal cord injuries and traumatic vascular injuries requires a multidisciplinary approach involving prehospital providers, emergency physicians, neurosurgeons, and neurointensivists. Critical care management of the patient with neurotrauma is focused on the prevention of secondary injuries. Much research is still needed for potential neuroprotection therapies.

Evidence-based prehospital management of severe traumatic brain injury: a comparative analysis of current clinical practice guidelines

OBJECTIVE

This study appraised the completeness and level of evidence behind prehospital recommendations in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for management of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Differences and similarities in key recommendations for prehospital emergency care were assessed between current CPGs.

METHODS

A systematic search identified current evidence-based CPGs for the management of severe TBI. The identified CPGs were screened for prehospital recommendations. Finally, an evaluation of the completeness and level of evidence for each of the identified recommendations was carried out. A review of the literature identified additional evidence. Designs of the retrieved publications were considered and classified according to the GRADE levels of evidence.

RESULTS

This study identified 12 current CPGs for the management of patients after traumatic brain injury. Of these, twenty-one prehospital recommendations were selected. Only a few CPGs made recommendations on temperature management and ventilation patterns. Statements on prehospital transport and advanced airway management were common to all of the guidelines. Statements on initial treatment demonstrated the greatest variability. The literature review identified several relevant publications not included in the CPGs even after we controlled for the indicated time-intervals of their literature search. In addition, evidence from more recent trials published outside the search-interval of the clinical practice guidelines was found.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of current guidelines on traumatic brain injury will not always facilitate decisions about best or most appropriate practice for prehospital practitioners. The amount of recommended prehospital interventions varied considerably, and there was large content variation in prehospital recommendations in these guidelines. Not all evidence was taken into account and not all CPGs were up-to-date.

Trauma and aggressive homeostasis management

Homeostasis refers to the capacity of the human body to maintain a stable constant state by means of continuous dynamic equilibrium adjustments controlled by a medley of interconnected regulatory mechanisms. Patients who sustain tissue injury, such as trauma or surgery, undergo a well-understood reproducible metabolic and neuroendocrine stress response. This review discusses 3 issues that concern homeostasis in the acute care of trauma patients directly related to the stress response: hyperglycemia, lactic acidosis, and hypothermia. There is significant reason to question the "conventional wisdom" relating to current approaches to restoring homeostasis in critically ill and trauma patients.

Traumatic brain injury: A case-based review

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injuries are common and costly to hospital systems. Most of the guidelines on management of traumatic brain injuries are taken from the Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines. This is a review of the current literature discussing the evolving practice of traumatic brain injury.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search using multiple databases was performed for articles published through September 2012 with concentration on meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and randomized controlled trials.

RESULTS

The focus of care should be to minimize secondary brain injury by surgically decompressing certain hematomas, maintain systolic blood pressure above 90 mmHg, oxygen saturations above 93%, euthermia, intracranial pressures below 20 mmHg, and cerebral perfusion pressure between 60-80 mmHg.

CONCLUSION

Much is still unknown about the management of traumatic brain injury. The current practice guidelines have not yet been sufficiently validated, however equipoise is a major issue when conducting randomized control trials among patients with traumatic brain injury.

[Treatment alternatives in massive hemorrhage]

Massive hemorrhage is the main cause of mortality and morbidity in trauma patients, and is one of the most important causes in any patient following major surgery. Conventional treatment consists of volume replacement, including the transfusion of blood products, so that tissue perfusion and oxygenation may be maintained. Associated hypothermia, acidosis and coagulopathy is a lethal triad. This review focuses on the latest therapeutic management of massive hemorrhage. The authors advocate the use of crystalloids as per protocol (controlled volumes) in order to achieve a systolic blood pressure of 85mmHg. The administration of the three blood products (red cells, plasma, and platelets) should be on a 1:1:1 basis. Where possible, this in turn should be guided by thromboelastography performed at point of care near the patient. Coagulopathy can occur early and late. With the exception of tranexamic acid, the cost-benefit relationships of the hemostatic agents, such as fibrinogen, prothrombin complex, and recombinant F VII, are subject to discussion.