51
|
Yarali H, Polat M, Mumusoglu S, Yarali I, Bozdag G. Preparation of endometrium for frozen embryo replacement cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet 2016; 33:1287-1304. [PMID: 27549760 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-016-0787-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2016] [Accepted: 07/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the best protocol to prepare endometrium for frozen embryo replacement (FER) cycles. METHODS This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. Following PubMed and OvidSP search, a total of 1166 studies published after 1990 were identified following removal of duplicates. Following exclusion of studies not matching our inclusion criteria, a total of 33 studies were analyzed. Primary outcome measure was live birth. The following protocols, including true natural cycle (tNC), modified natural cycle (mNC), artificial cycle (AC) with or without suppression, and mild ovarian stimulation (OS) with gonadotropin (Gn) or aromatase inhibitor (AI), were compared. RESULTS No statistically significant difference for both clinical pregnancy and live birth was noted between tNC and mNC groups. When tNC and AC without suppression groups are compared, there was a statistically significant difference in clinical pregnancy rate in favor of tNC, whereas it failed to reach statistical significance for live birth. When tNC and AC with suppression groups are compared, there was a statistically significant difference in live birth rate favoring the latter. Similar pregnancy outcome was noted among mNC versus AC with or without suppression groups. Similarly, no difference in clinical pregnancy and live birth was noted when ACs with or without suppression groups are compared. CONCLUSIONS There is no consistent superiority of any endometrial preparation for FER. However, mNC has several advantages (being patient-friendly; yielding at least equivalent or better pregnancy rates when compared with tNC and AC with or without suppression; may not require LPS). Mild OS with Gn or AI may be promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hakan Yarali
- Department of Obstetric and Gynecology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, 06100, Ankara, Turkey. .,Anatolia IVF and Women Health Centre, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Mehtap Polat
- Anatolia IVF and Women Health Centre, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sezcan Mumusoglu
- Department of Obstetric and Gynecology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, 06100, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Irem Yarali
- Anatolia IVF and Women Health Centre, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gurkan Bozdag
- Department of Obstetric and Gynecology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, 06100, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Arefi S, Hoseini A, Farifteh F, Zeraati H. Modified natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer in patients with repeated implantation failure: An observational study. Int J Reprod Biomed 2016. [DOI: 10.29252/ijrm.14.7.5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
|
53
|
van de Vijver A, Drakopoulos P, Van Landuyt L, Vaiarelli A, Blockeel C, Santos-Ribeiro S, Tournaye H, Polyzos NP. Vitamin D deficiency and pregnancy rates following frozen–thawed embryo transfer: a prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod 2016; 31:1749-54. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2016] [Accepted: 04/18/2016] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
|
54
|
Madero S, Rodriguez A, Vassena R, Vernaeve V. Endometrial preparation: effect of estrogen dose and administration route on reproductive outcomes in oocyte donation cycles with fresh embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2016; 31:1755-64. [PMID: 27141040 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2016] [Accepted: 04/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Is there a difference in live birth rates following endometrial preparation with either a constant or increasing estrogen dose in fresh embryo transfer from oocyte donation cycles? SUMMARY ANSWER There is no difference in live birth rates between a constant dose versus an increasing dose of estrogen after fresh embryo transfer in oocyte donation cycles with oral or transdermal supplementation. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Endometrial preparation (EP) with estrogen and progesterone, and embryo-endometrial synchronicity are determinant for adequate embryo implantation. Estrogen is crucial and different exogenous administration patterns could imply variations on EP. Moreover, estrogen undergoes metabolization by the intestines and liver when administered orally, an effect that is bypassed by transdermal administration. Information on the effect of replacement patterns and route of administration of E on reproductive outcomes of women undergoing fresh embryo transfer from oocyte donation cycles is scarce. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Retrospective cohort study including 8362 embryo transfers following ICSI, corresponding to 8254 patients, between October 2010 and March 2015. A total of 5593 (66.9%) patients received an increasing E dose (ID) (oral: 2 mg/day day(d)1-7, 4 mg days d8-12, 6 mg d13-embryo transfer; transdermal: 75 µg/3 days on d1-6, 150 µg/3 days d7-embryo transfer) while 2769 (33.1%) received a constant dose (CD) of estrogen (oral: 6 mg/day 1-embryo transfer; transdermal: 150 µg/3 days d1-embryo transfer). Embryos were generated by ICSI with fresh or vitrified donor oocytes fertilized with either fresh or frozen sperm from either the couple partner or donor. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Cohort allocation was not related to patient characteristics; instead it reflected an internal policy change in E administration. Effect of estrogen dose (ID versus CD) on biochemical, clinical, ongoing and live birth rates, stratified by administration route, was analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis adjusted by donor and recipient demographic and cycle characteristics. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE No difference in live birth rate was found between CD and ID for oral (33.0 versus 32.5%, P = 0.81) and transdermal (35.3 versus 33.5%, P = 0.33) supplementation. Biochemical pregnancy rate was higher in CD than ID (53.7 versus 47.5%, P < 0.001) when patients received oral supplementation. Adjusted analysis confirmed that oral administration had a greater impact on biochemical pregnancy rates than transdermal (odds ratio (OR) 1.28; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-1.48, P = 0.001 versus OR 1.13; 95% CI 1.00-1.30, P = 0.055). Sub-analysis of transfers between day 12 and 15 of estrogen supplementation showed no difference between CD and ID in pregnancy outcomes. Demographic variables and cycle characteristics were comparable between both groups. Moreover, the use of the oocyte donation model reduces confounding factors related to oocyte age, embryo aneuploidy, and embryo quality. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The greatest limitation of this study is its retrospective nature. On the other hand, this study was performed using donated oocytes; although this is unlikely to affect the results, we cannot exclude the possibility that a high quality female gamete responds differently to endometrial state in comparison to a patient's own oocytes. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS In fresh embryo transfer from oocyte donation cycles, changes in the protocol of E replacement do not seem to have an impact on clinical outcomes and performance; for this reason estrogen replacement protocols can be adjusted to the patient's characteristics and preferences as well as to the most cost effective strategy. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Madero
- Clínica EUGIN, 08029 Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - R Vassena
- Clínica EUGIN, 08029 Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
55
|
van de Vijver A, Polyzos N, Van Landuyt L, Mackens S, Stoop D, Camus M, De Vos M, Tournaye H, Blockeel C. What is the optimal duration of progesterone administration before transferring a vitrified-warmed cleavage stage embryo? A randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2016; 31:1097-1104. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/30/2023] Open
|
56
|
Blockeel C, Drakopoulos P, Santos-Ribeiro S, Polyzos NP, Tournaye H. A fresh look at the freeze-all protocol: a SWOT analysis. Hum Reprod 2016; 31:491-7. [PMID: 26724793 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2015] [Accepted: 12/16/2015] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The 'freeze-all' strategy with the segmentation of IVF treatment, namely with the use of a GnRH antagonist protocol, GnRH agonist triggering, the elective cryopreservation of all embryos by vitrification and a frozen-thawed embryo transfer in a subsequent cycle, has become more popular. However, the approach still encounters drawbacks. In this opinion paper, a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats) analysis sheds light on the different aspects of this strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christophe Blockeel
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Jette, Belgium
| | | | | | - Nikolaos P Polyzos
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Jette, Belgium
| | - Herman Tournaye
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Jette, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Drakopoulos P, Blockeel C, Stoop D, Camus M, de Vos M, Tournaye H, Polyzos NP. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos? Hum Reprod 2016; 31:370-6. [PMID: 26724797 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 121] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2015] [Accepted: 11/25/2015] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What is the impact of ovarian response on cumulative live birth rates (LBR) following utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos in women undergoing their first ovarian stimulation cycle, planned to undergo single embryo transfer (SET). SUMMARY ANSWER Cumulative LBR significantly increases with the number of oocytes retrieved. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Several studies have addressed the issue of the optimal number of oocytes retrieved following controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for IVF/ICSI and demonstrated that ovarian response is independently related to LBR following IVF/ICSI. The vast majority of studies pertained only to the outcome of the fresh IVF cycle and did not evaluate the cumulative LBR following the transfer of all fresh and frozen-thawed embryos after a single ovarian stimulation, which is the most meaningful outcome for the infertile patient. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This study is a large cohort analysis of retrospective data from January 2009 to December 2013 in a tertiary medical centre, at the Centre for Reproductive Medicine at the University Hospital of Brussels. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS This study included 1099 eligible consecutive women 18-40 years old undergoing their first IVF cycle and planned to undergo SET in their fresh cycle. All patients were treated with a conventional starting gonadotrophin dose of 150-225 IU recombinant FSH (rFSH) in a fixed GnRH antagonist protocol. Vitrification was used as cryopreservation method. To evaluate the impact of oocyte yield on fresh LBR and on cumulative LBR after utilization of all cryopreserved embryos, patients were categorized into four groups according to the number of oocytes retrieved: 1-3 (Group A), 4-9 (Group B), 10-15 (Group C) or >15 oocytes (Group D). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Regarding LBR in the fresh IVF/ICSI cycles, unadjusted results did not show any significant difference when comparing either high (>15 oocytes) versus normal (10-15 oocytes) (P = 0.65), or normal (10-15) versus suboptimal (4-9 oocytes) responders (P = 0.2). LBR in the fresh cycles were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in high, normal and suboptimal responders when compared with the low ovarian responder group (1-3 oocytes). Moderate-severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome occurred in 11 out of 1099 patients (1%). The cumulative LBR significantly increased with the number of oocytes retrieved (χ(2) test for trend P < 0.001). High responders (>15 oocytes) demonstrated a significantly higher LBR not only versus poor (0-3 oocytes) (P < 0.001) and suboptimal (4-9) responders (P < 0.001), but also versus women with normal (10-15) ovarian response (P = 0.014). Finally, although suboptimal responders had a better outcome compared with poor ovarian responders (P = 0.002), this group had a significantly lower cumulative LBR compared with normal ovarian responders (P = 0.02). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the ovarian response category remained an independent predictive factor (P < 0.001) for cumulative LBR. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION This is a cohort analysis based on retrospective data collection. Despite our robust methodological approach, the presence of biases related to retrospective design cannot be excluded. High responders may inherently have had a better prognosis. In addition, we cannot provide any guidance for patients undergoing either multiple embryo transfers or treated with higher gonadotrophin doses. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Women undergoing COS for their first IVF/ICSI cycle and SET should be informed that, although the number of oocytes retrieved does not affect LBR in the fresh cycle, the higher the oocyte yield, the higher the probability to achieve a live birth after utilization of all cryopreserved embryos. Large cohort studies are needed in order to confirm our results of cumulative LBR in different ovarian stimulation settings with higher stimulation doses. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS No external funding was used for this study. No conflicts of interest are declared.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panagiotis Drakopoulos
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christophe Blockeel
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dominic Stoop
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Michel Camus
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Michel de Vos
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Herman Tournaye
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nikolaos P Polyzos
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Palomba S, Santagni S, La Sala GB. Progesterone administration for luteal phase deficiency in human reproduction: an old or new issue? J Ovarian Res 2015; 8:77. [PMID: 26585269 PMCID: PMC4653859 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-015-0205-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2015] [Accepted: 11/11/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Luteal phase deficiency (LPD) is described as a condition of insufficient progesterone exposure to maintain a regular secretory endometrium and allow for normal embryo implantation and growth. Recently, scientific focus is turning to understand the physiology of implantation, in particular the several molecular markers of endometrial competence, through the recent transcriptomic approaches and microarray technology. In spite of the wide availability of clinical and instrumental methods for assessing endometrial competence, reproducible and reliable diagnostic tests for LPD are currently lacking, so no type-IA evidence has been proposed by the main scientific societies for assessing endometrial competence in infertile couples. Nevertheless, LPD is a very common condition that may occur during a series of clinical conditions, and during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and hyperstimulation (COH) programs. In many cases, the correct approach to treat LPD is the identification and correction of any underlying condition while, in case of no underlying dysfunction, the treatment becomes empiric. To date, no direct data is available regarding the efficacy of luteal phase support for improving fertility in spontaneous cycles or in non-gonadotropin induced ovulatory cycles. On the contrary, in gonadotropin in vitro fertilization (IVF) and non-IVF cycles, LPD is always present and progesterone exerts a significant positive effect on reproductive outcomes. The scientific debate still remains open regarding progesterone administration protocols, specially on routes of administration, dose and timing and the potential association with other drugs, and further research is still needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Palomba
- Centre of Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova - IRCCS, Viale Risorgimento 80, 42123, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
| | - Susanna Santagni
- Centre of Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova - IRCCS, Viale Risorgimento 80, 42123, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
| | - Giovanni Battista La Sala
- Centre of Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova - IRCCS, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Università 4, 41100 Viale Risorgimento 80, 42123, Modena, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Gingold JA, Lee JA, Rodriguez-Purata J, Whitehouse MC, Sandler B, Grunfeld L, Mukherjee T, Copperman AB. Endometrial pattern, but not endometrial thickness, affects implantation rates in euploid embryo transfers. Fertil Steril 2015; 104:620-8.e5. [PMID: 26079695 PMCID: PMC4561002 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.05.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2015] [Revised: 05/29/2015] [Accepted: 05/29/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the relationship of endometrial thickness (EnT) and endometrial pattern (EnP) to euploid embryo transfer (ET) outcomes. DESIGN Retrospective cohort. SETTING Private academic clinic. PATIENT(S) Patients (n = 277; age 36.1 ± 4.0 years) whose embryos (n = 476) underwent aneuploidy screening with fresh (n = 176) or frozen (n = 180) ET from July 2010 to March 2014. INTERVENTION(S) The EnT and EnP were measured on trigger day and at ET. Patients were stratified by age and cycle type (fresh or frozen). Cycle data were combined at trigger day, but separated at ET day. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Outcome measures were implantation rate, pregnancy rate, and clinical pregnancy rate. Analysis was conducted using χ(2) analysis and Fisher's exact test. RESULT(S) A total of 234 gestational sacs, 251 pregnancies, and 202 clinical pregnancies resulted from 356 cycles. The EnT (9.6 ± 1.8 mm; range: 5-15 mm) at trigger day (n = 241 cycles), as a continuous or categorical variable (≤8 vs. >8 mm), was not associated with implantation rate, pregnancy rate, or clinical pregnancy rate. The EnT at day of fresh ET (9.7 ± 2.2 mm; range: 4.4-17.9 mm) (n = 176 cycles) or frozen ET (9.1 ± 2.1 mm; range: 4.2-17.7 mm) (n = 180 cycles) was not associated with implantation rate, pregnancy rate, or clinical pregnancy rate. Type 3 EnP at trigger day was associated with increased serum progesterone at trigger and a decreased implantation rate, compared with type 2 EnP. The EnP at fresh or frozen ET was not associated with implantation rate, pregnancy rate, or clinical pregnancy rate. CONCLUSION(S) Within the study population, EnT was not significantly associated with clinical outcomes of euploid ETs. A type 3 EnP at trigger day suggests a prematurely closed window of implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian A Gingold
- Reproductive Medicine Associates of New York, New York, New York; Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
| | - Joseph A Lee
- Reproductive Medicine Associates of New York, New York, New York
| | | | | | - Benjamin Sandler
- Reproductive Medicine Associates of New York, New York, New York; Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Lawrence Grunfeld
- Reproductive Medicine Associates of New York, New York, New York; Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Tanmoy Mukherjee
- Reproductive Medicine Associates of New York, New York, New York; Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Alan B Copperman
- Reproductive Medicine Associates of New York, New York, New York; Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Farquhar C, Rishworth JR, Brown J, Nelen WLDM, Marjoribanks J. Assisted reproductive technology: an overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015:CD010537. [PMID: 26174592 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010537.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As many as one in six couples will encounter problems with fertility, defined as failure to achieve a clinical pregnancy after regular intercourse for 12 months. Increasingly, couples are turning to assisted reproductive technology (ART) for help with conceiving and ultimately giving birth to a healthy live baby of their own. Fertility treatments are complex, and each ART cycle consists of several steps. If one of the steps is incorrectly applied, the stakes are high as conception may not occur. With this in mind, it is important that each step of the ART cycle is supported by good evidence from well-designed studies. OBJECTIVES To summarise the evidence from Cochrane systematic reviews on procedures and treatment options available to couples with subfertility undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART). METHODS Published Cochrane systematic reviews of couples undergoing ART (in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection) were eligible for inclusion in the overview. We also identified Cochrane reviews in preparation, for future inclusion.The outcomes of the overview were live birth (primary outcome), clinical pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, miscarriage and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (secondary outcomes). Studies of intrauterine insemination and ovulation induction were excluded.Selection of systematic reviews, data extraction and quality assessment were undertaken in duplicate. Review quality was assessed by using the AMSTAR tool. Reviews were organised by their relevance to specific stages in the ART cycle. Their findings were summarised in the text and data for each outcome were reported in 'Additional tables'. MAIN RESULTS Fifty-nine systematic reviews published in The Cochrane Library up to July 2015 were included. All were high quality. Thirty-two reviews identified interventions that were effective (n = 19) or promising (n = 13), 14 reviews identified interventions that were either ineffective (n = 2) or possibly ineffective (n = 12), and 13 reviews were unable to draw conclusions due to lack of evidence.An additional 11 protocols and five titles were identified for future inclusion in this overview. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This overview provides the most up to date evidence on ART cycles from systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials. Fertility treatments are costly and the stakes are high. Using the best available evidence to optimise outcomes is best practice. The evidence from this overview could be used to develop clinical practice guidelines and protocols for use in daily clinical practice, in order to improve live birth rates and reduce rates of multiple pregnancy, cycle cancellation and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cindy Farquhar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, FMHS Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand, 1003
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
61
|
Outcome Analysis of Day-3 Frozen Embryo Transfer v/s Fresh Embryo Transfer in Infertility: A Prospective Therapeutic Study in Indian Scenario. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2015; 66:345-51. [PMID: 27486280 DOI: 10.1007/s13224-015-0700-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2015] [Accepted: 03/31/2015] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Advanced fertilization techniques like frozen embryo transfer (FET) and assisted reproductive technology have become popular and commonly used methods to treat patients suffering from infertility. Incidences of infertility are on a rise due to increased representation of females in the work place, delay in marriages, stress, and ignorance. METHODS We performed this prospective therapeutic study to compare FET and fresh embryo transfer in the treatment of infertility in terms of conception rate, patient acceptance, complications, and patient's compliance. A prospective screening therapeutic study on 108 patients, from September 2013 to September 2014 in Karnataka, India, randomized the patients into 2 groups (n = 54), Group-I treated with day-3 FET while Group-II was treated with fresh embryo transfer, after performing ICSI. RESULTS In 108 patients, 45 % patients were within 35 years of age, 35 % were in the age group 35-39. Significantly, 22 (40.75 %) patients treated with FET conceived (P = 0.022), whereas 16 (29.63 %) patients treated with fresh embryo transfer conceived (P = 0.59). DISCUSSION There is limited published literature from the subcontinent, comparing techniques like FET and embryo transfers in the treatment of infertility. Awareness and economic reforms must be formulated in India to facilitate individuals facing infertility problems to conceive. CONCLUSION FET has better and significant conception rates compared to fresh embryo transfers. FET shares an advantage of providing good quality embryos for future and subsequent implantations in cases of failure. Patient counseling and motivation play a pivotal role in the success of therapeutic procedure.
Collapse
|
62
|
Refaat B, Dalton E, Ledger WL. Ectopic pregnancy secondary to in vitro fertilisation-embryo transfer: pathogenic mechanisms and management strategies. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2015; 13:30. [PMID: 25884617 PMCID: PMC4403912 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-015-0025-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2015] [Accepted: 04/03/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ectopic pregnancy (EP) is the leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality during the first trimester and the incidence increases dramatically with in vitro fertilisation and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). The co-existence of an EP with a viable intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) is known as heterotopic pregnancy (HP) affecting about 1% of patients during assisted conception. EP/HP can cause significant morbidity and occasional mortality and represent diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, particularly during fertility treatment. Many risk factors related to IVF-ET techniques and the cause of infertility have been documented. The combination of transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) and serum human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) is the most reliable diagnostic tool, with early diagnosis of EP/HP permitting conservative management. This review describes the risk factors, diagnostic modalities and treatment approaches of EP/HP during IVF-ET and also their impact on subsequent fertility treatment. METHODS The scientific literature was searched for studies investigating EP/HP during IVF-ET. Publications in English and within the past 6 years were mostly selected. RESULTS A history of tubal infertility, pelvic inflammatory disease and specific aspects of embryo transfer technique are the most significant risk factors for later EP. Early measurement of serum hCG and performance of TVS by an expert operator as early as gestational week 5 can identify cases of possible EP. These women should be closely monitored with repeated ultrasound and hCG measurement until a diagnosis is reached. Treatment must be customised to the clinical condition and future fertility requirements of the patient. In cases of HP, the viable IUP can be preserved in the majority of cases but requires early detection of HP. No apparent negative impact of the different treatment approaches for EP/HP on subsequent IVF-ET, except for risk of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS EP/HP are tragic events in a couple's reproductive life, and the earlier the diagnosis the better the prognosis. Due to the increase incidence following IVF-ET, there is a compelling need to develop a diagnostic biomarker/algorithm that can predict pregnancy outcome with high sensitivity and specificity before IVF-ET to prevent and/or properly manage those who are at higher risk of EP/HP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bassem Refaat
- Laboratory Medicine Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Al-Abdiyah Campus, PO Box 7607, Makkah, KSA.
| | - Elizabeth Dalton
- School of Women's & Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2031, Australia.
| | - William L Ledger
- School of Women's & Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2031, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Farquhar C, Rishworth JR, Brown J, Nelen WLDM, Marjoribanks J. Assisted reproductive technology: an overview of Cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014:CD010537. [PMID: 25532533 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010537.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As many as one in six couples will encounter problems with fertility, defined as failure to achieve a clinical pregnancy after regular intercourse for 12 months. Increasingly, couples are turning to assisted reproductive technology (ART) for help with conceiving and ultimately giving birth to a healthy live baby of their own. Fertility treatments are complex, and each ART cycle consists of several steps. If one of the steps is incorrectly applied, the stakes are high as conception may not occur. With this in mind, it is important that each step of the ART cycle is supported by good evidence from well-designed studies. OBJECTIVES To summarise the evidence from Cochrane systematic reviews on procedures and treatment options available to couples with subfertility undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART). METHODS Published Cochrane systematic reviews of couples undergoing ART (in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection) were eligible for inclusion in the overview. We also identified Cochrane reviews in preparation, for future inclusion.The outcomes of the overview were live birth (primary outcome), clinical pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, miscarriage and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (secondary outcomes). Studies of intrauterine insemination and ovulation induction were excluded.Selection of systematic reviews, data extraction and quality assessment were undertaken in duplicate. Review quality was assessed by using the AMSTAR tool. Reviews were organised by their relevance to specific stages in the ART cycle. Their findings were summarised in the text and data for each outcome were reported in 'Additional tables'. MAIN RESULTS Fifty-eight systematic reviews published in The Cochrane Library were included. All were high quality. Thirty-two reviews identified interventions that were effective (n = 19) or promising (n = 13), 14 reviews identified interventions that were either ineffective (n = 3) or possibly ineffective (n=11), and 12 reviews were unable to draw conclusions due to lack of evidence.An additional 11 protocols and one title were identified for future inclusion in this overview. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This overview provides the most up to date evidence on ART cycles from systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials. Fertility treatments are costly and the stakes are high. Using the best available evidence to optimise outcomes is best practice. The evidence from this overview could be used to develop clinical practice guidelines and protocols for use in daily clinical practice, in order to improve live birth rates and reduce rates of multiple pregnancy, cycle cancellation and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cindy Farquhar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland ,Auckland, NewZealand
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
64
|
van de Vijver A, Polyzos N, Van Landuyt L, De Vos M, Camus M, Stoop D, Tournaye H, Blockeel C. Cryopreserved embryo transfer in an artificial cycle: is GnRH agonist down-regulation necessary? Reprod Biomed Online 2014; 29:588-94. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2014] [Revised: 08/11/2014] [Accepted: 08/12/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
65
|
Brady PC, Kaser DJ, Ginsburg ES, Ashby RK, Missmer SA, Correia KF, Racowsky C. Serum progesterone concentration on day of embryo transfer in donor oocyte cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 2014; 31:569-75. [PMID: 24619510 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-014-0199-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2013] [Accepted: 02/24/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the association between serum progesterone (P) levels on the day of embryo transfer (ET) and pregnancy rates in fresh donor IVF/ICSI cycles. METHODS Fresh donor cycles with day 3 ET from 10/2007 to 8/2012 were included (n = 229). Most cycles (93 %) were programmed with a gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist; oral, vaginal or transdermal estradiol was used for endometrial priming, and intramuscular P was used for luteal support (50-100 mg/day). Recipient P levels were measured at ET, and P dose was increased by 50-100 % if <20 ng/mL per clinic practice. The main outcome measure was rate of live birth (> = 24 weeks gestational age). Generalized estimating equations were used to account for multiple cycles from the same recipient, adjusted a priori for recipient and donor age. RESULTS Mean recipient serum P at ET was 25.5 ± 10.1 ng/mL. Recipients with P < 20 ng/mL at ET, despite P dose increases after ET, were less likely to achieve clinical pregnancy (RR = 0.75, 95 % CI = 0.60-0.94, p = 0.01) and live birth (RR = 0.77, 95 % CI = 0.60-0.98, p = 0.04), as compared to those with P ≥ 20 ng/mL. P dose increases were more often required in overweight and obese recipients. CONCLUSIONS Serum P levels on the day of ET in fresh donor IVF/ICSI cycles were positively correlated with clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. An increase in P dose after ET was insufficient to rescue pregnancy rates. Overweight and obese recipients may require higher initial doses of P supplementation. Future research is needed to define optimal serum P at ET and the interventions to achieve this target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula C Brady
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Division of Reproductive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
66
|
Manno M, Tomei F. Can we prevent premature luteinization in IVF cycles? Med Hypotheses 2014; 82:122-3. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2013.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2013] [Accepted: 11/04/2013] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
67
|
Farquhar C, Rishworth JR, Brown J, Nelen WLDM, Marjoribanks J. Assisted reproductive technology: an overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013:CD010537. [PMID: 23970457 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010537.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As many as one in six couples will encounter problems with fertility, defined as failure to achieve a clinical pregnancy after regular intercourse for 12 months. Increasingly, couples are turning to assisted reproductive technology (ART) for help with conceiving and ultimately giving birth to a healthy live baby of their own. Fertility treatments are complex, and each ART cycle consists of several steps. If one of the steps is incorrectly applied, the stakes are high as conception may not occur. With this in mind, it is important that each step of the ART cycle is supported by good evidence from well-designed studies. OBJECTIVES To summarise the evidence from Cochrane systematic reviews on procedures and treatment options available to couples with subfertility undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART). METHODS Published Cochrane systematic reviews of couples undergoing ART (in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection) were eligible for inclusion in the overview. We also identified Cochrane reviews in preparation, for future inclusion.The outcomes of the overview were live birth (primary outcome), clinical pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, miscarriage and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (secondary outcomes). Studies of intrauterine insemination and ovulation induction were excluded.Selection of systematic reviews, data extraction and quality assessment were undertaken in duplicate. Review quality was assessed by using the AMSTAR tool. Reviews were organised by their relevance to specific stages in the ART cycle. Their findings were summarised in the text and data for each outcome were reported in 'Additional tables'. MAIN RESULTS Fifty-four systematic reviews published in The Cochrane Library were included. All were high quality. Thirty reviews identified interventions that were effective (n = 18) or promising (n = 12), 13 reviews identified interventions that were either ineffective (n = 3) or possibly ineffective (n=10), and 11 reviews were unable to draw conclusions due to lack of evidence.An additional 15 protocols and two titles were identified for future inclusion in this overview. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This overview provides the most up to date evidence on ART cycles from systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials. Fertility treatments are costly and the stakes are high. Using the best available evidence to optimise outcomes is best practice. The evidence from this overview could be used to develop clinical practice guidelines and protocols for use in daily clinical practice, in order to improve live birth rates and reduce rates of multiple pregnancy, cycle cancellation and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cindy Farquhar
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, FMHS Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand, 1003
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
68
|
[Frozen embryo transfer protocol: does spontaneous cycle give good results?]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012; 41:648-52. [PMID: 22342107 DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2011.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2010] [Accepted: 07/21/2011] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Frozen embryos' transfer optimize the pregnancy rates per retrieval. In France, 60% of transfer cycles occur in stimulated cycles. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of frozen embryo transfers in spontaneous, substituted and stimulated cycle. PATIENTS AND METHODS This retrospective study includes patients who are 18-43 years old and had a frozen embryo transfer between 1st January 2008 and 31st December 2008. Three transfer protocols have been used: the spontaneous cycle (group 1), substituted cycle (group 2), and stimulated cycle (group 3). The characteristics of couples, embryonic parameters and data transfer cycles, and their outcomes were evaluated. RESULT(S) Among the 333 patients, 132 were included in the first group, 24 in the second group and 177 in the third group. After checking the homogeneity of the three groups, we found pregnancy rates (respectively 20.49 vs 13.04% and 11.32%, P=0.0348), and deliveries (respectively 13.93 vs 8,7 and 6.29%, P=0.0314), significantly higher in spontaneous cycles. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION Currently there is no consensus on the best technique for endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer. Our results support transfers in spontaneous cycle for normo-ovulating patients. Natural cycles can achieve good pregnancy rates while minimizing the costs and side effects.
Collapse
|
69
|
Hormonal induction of endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril 2011; 96:530-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.07.1097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 126] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2011] [Accepted: 07/11/2011] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
70
|
Jeon HC, Choi M, Paik SH, Na SJ, Lee JH, Cho S. A Case of Assisted Reproductive Therapy-induced Erythema Nodosum. Ann Dermatol 2011; 23:362-4. [PMID: 21909209 PMCID: PMC3162268 DOI: 10.5021/ad.2011.23.3.362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2010] [Revised: 07/15/2010] [Accepted: 07/15/2010] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Erythema nodosum is a common variant of panniculitis. It is characterized by tender erythematous nodule and plaque on the anterior aspect of the leg. The etiology is not fully understood. It may be associated with a variety of disorders, including infection, medication, autoimmune disorders, pregnancy, and malignancy. A 33-year-old Korean woman presented with 1 week history of painful erythematous plaques on both knees. She was 7 weeks pregnant with assisted reproductive therapy, and had been maintained on daily intramuscular progesterone injection for 4 weeks. Histological examination of the lesions revealed septal panniculitis without vasculitis. Two days after discontinuing progesterone injection, the symptoms and lesions started to resolve. Herein we present a case of erythema nodosum caused by progesterone injection for endometrial preparation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hye Chan Jeon
- Department of Dermatology, Seoul National University Boramae Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
71
|
Lutealphase nach IVF. GYNAKOLOGISCHE ENDOKRINOLOGIE 2010. [DOI: 10.1007/s10304-009-0343-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|