Gap junctional intercellular communication capacity by gap-FRAP technique: A comparative study

The effect of 3-hydroxybutyrate methyl ester on learning and memory in mice

Learning and memory requires energy-demanding cellular processes and can be enhanced when the brain is supplemented with metabolic substrates. In this study, we found that neuroglial cell metabolic activity was significantly elevated when cultured in the presence of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) degradation product 3-hydroxybutyrate (3-HB) and derivatives. We demonstrated that the receptor for 3-HB, namely, protein upregulated in macrophages by IFN-gamma (PUMA-G), was expressed in brain and upregulated in mice treated with 3-hydroxybutyrate methyl ester (3-HBME). We also affirmed increased expression of connexin 36 protein and phosphorylated ERK2 (extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2) in brain tissues following 3-HBME treatment, although these differences were not statistically significant. Mice treated with 3-HBME performed significantly (p<0.05) better in the Morris water maze than either the negative controls (no treatment) or positive controls (acetyl-l-carnitine treatment). Moreover, we found that 3-HBME enhanced gap junctional intercellular communication between neurons. Thus, 3-HB and derivatives enhance learning and memory, possibly through a signaling pathway requiring PUMA-G that increases protein synthesis and gap junctional intercellular communication.

Advantages and limitations of commonly used methods to assay the molecular permeability of gap junctional intercellular communication

The role of gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC) in regulation of normal growth and differentiation is becoming increasingly recognized as a major cellular function. GJIC consists of intercellular exchange of low molecular weight molecules, and is the only means for direct contact between cytoplasms of adjacent animal cells. Disturbances of GJIC have been associated with many pathological conditions, such as carcinogenesis or hereditary illness. Reliable and accurate methods for the determination of GJIC are therefore important in cell biology studies. There are several methods used successfully in numerous laboratories to measure GJIC both in vitro and in vivo. This review comments on techniques currently used to study cell-to-cell communication, either by measuring dye transfer, as in methods like microinjection, scrape loading, gap-fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (gap-FRAP), the preloading assay, and local activation of a molecular fluorescent probe (LAMP), or by measuring electrical conductance and metabolic cooperation. As we will discuss in this review, these techniques are not equivalent but instead provide complementary information. We will focus on their main advantages and limitations. Although biological applications guide the choice of techniques we describe, we also review points that must be taken into consideration before using a methodology, such as the number of cells to analyze.