Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer

Proximal and distal rectal cancers differ in curative resectability and local recurrence

AIM: To evaluate patients with proximal rectal cancer (PRC) (> 6 cm up to 12 cm) and distal rectal cancer (DRC) (0 to 6 cm from the anal verge).

METHODS: Two hundred and eighteen patients (120 male, 98 female, median age 58 years, range 19-88 years) comprised 100 with PRC and 118 with DRC. The proportion of T1, T2 vs T3, T4 stage cancers was similar in both groups (PRC: T1+T2 = 29%; T3+T4 = 71% and DRC: T1+T2 = -31%; T3+T4 = 69%). All patients had cancer confined to the rectum - those with synchronous distant metastasis were excluded. Surgical resection was with curative intent with or without pre-operative chemoradiation (c-RT). Follow-up was for a median of 35 mo (range: 12 to 126 mo). End points were: 30 d mortality, complications of operation, microscopic tumour- free margins, resection with a tumour-free circumferential margin (CRM) of 1 to 2 mm and > 2 mm, local recurrence, survival and the permanent stoma rate.

RESULTS: Overall 30-d mortality was 6% (12): PRC 7 % and DRC 4%. Postoperative complications occurred in 14% with PRC compared with 21.5% with DRC, urinary retention was the complication most frequently reported (PRC 2% vs DRC 9%, P = 0.04). Twelve percent with PRC compared with 37% with DRC were subjected to preoperative c-RT (P = 0.03). A tumour-free CRM of 1 to 2 mm and > 2 mm was reported in 93% and 82% with PRC and 88% and 75% with DRC respectively (PRC vs DRC, P > 0.05). However, local recurrence was 5% for PRC vs 11% for DRC (P < 0.001). Three and five years survival was 65.6% and 60.2% for PRC vs 67% and 64.3% for DRC respectively. No patient with PRC and 23 (20%) with DRC received an abdomino-perineal resection.

CONCLUSION: PRC and DRC differ in the rate of abdomino-perineal resection, post-operative urinary retention and local recurrence. Survival in both groups was similar.

Laparoscopic extended lateral pelvic node dissection following total mesorectal excision for advanced rectal cancer: initial clinical experience

AIM

To evaluate the technical feasibility, safety, and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic extended lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLD) following total mesorectal excision (TME) in patients with advanced low rectal cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

A review of a prospectively collected database at Kyungpook National University Hospital from May 2003 to September 2009 revealed a series of 16 consecutive laparoscopic TME with LPLD patients with preoperative diagnosis of lateral node metastasis. Data regarding patient demographics, operating time, perioperative blood loss, surgical morbidity, lateral lymph node status, functional outcome, and mid-term oncologic result were analyzed.

RESULTS

In all 16 patients, the procedures were completed without conversion to open surgery. During the study period, robot-assisted laparoscopic LPLD was performed in two patients. Mean operative time was 321.9 min (range 220-510 min). The mean number of lateral lymph nodes harvested was 9.1 (range 3-19), and a total of nine patients (56.2%) had lymph node metastases. Postoperative mortality and morbidity were 0 and 31.2%, respectively. Recovery after the procedure was rapid, and mean hospital stay was 9.9 days (range 7-14 days). With median follow-up of 38 months, among nine patients who were lateral pelvic node positive, one patient experienced pelvic side-wall local recurrence (11.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic TME with LPLD is safe and feasible, with the advantage of a minimally invasive approach. Prospective controlled study comparing laparoscopy and conventional open surgery with long-term follow-up evaluation is needed to confirm the authors' initial experience.

Laparoscopic radical correction combined with extensive lymphadenectomy and pelvic autonomic nerve preservation for mid-to-low rectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

The purposes of this study were to confirm the definite metastasis and micrometastasis rate of upward and lateral lymph nodes of mid-to-low rectal cancer at stage II and stage III, and to evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic radical correction combined with extensive lymphadenectomy and pelvic autonomic nerve preservation (PANP).

METHODS

The study was performed in 68 patients who were diagnosed with mid-to-low rectal cancer at stage II or stage III and received laparoscopic radical correction combined with extensive lymphadenectomy and PANP from June 2006 to June 2008 in the General Surgery Department of Southwest Hospital. All lymph nodes resected in the surgeries were examined by hematoxylin and eosin (H & E) stain and immunohistochemistry with an antibody against cytokeratin 20 (CK20) to confirm the conditions of metastasis and micrometastasis. We compared the postoperative complications with those of traditional surgeries.

RESULTS

In 1571 lymph nodes, 16 lymph nodes were found to have definite metastasis in 6 patients (8.8%) and in 41 lymph nodes we found micrometastasis in 12 patients (17.6%). The total metastasis rate of upward and lateral lymph nodes was 19.1%. Compared with traditional surgeries, the new surgery had less blood loss and short convalescence and postoperative complications were not increased.

CONCLUSION

The total metastasis rate of upward and lateral lymph nodes is 19.1%. The laparoscopic radical correction combined with extensive lymphadenectomy and PANP is feasible and safe.

Medium-term results of neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy using irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy using irinotecan, 5-FU, and leucovorin (LV) for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer, which was a powerful ploychemotherapy in those days in Japan.

METHODS

Between 2001 and 2004, 26 patients with T3 or T4 and N0-2 non-metastatic resectable rectal cancer were selectively enrolled in this study. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisted of two cycles of irinotecan (80 mg/m²), 5-FU (500 mg/m²), and LV (250 mg/m²) on days 1, 8, and 15 for 4 weeks. Surgical resection was performed in all the patients 2-4 weeks after the completion of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Overall down-staging was observed in 15 patients. T level and N level down-staging were observed in 12 and 13 patients, respectively. A pathological complete response was observed in one patients. The median follow-up period was 75 months (range, 8-97 months). Recurrences occurred in 5 patients including pelvic relapses in 3 and distant metastases in 2. The 5-year relapse-free and overall survival rates were 74% and 84%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy comprised of a combination of multi-drugs as irinotecan, 5-FU, and LV may be beneficial to the prognoses of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Colonoscopic ultrasound is associated with a learning phenomenon despite previous rigid probe experience

Colonoscopic ultrasound (CUS) enables total colonoscopic examination combined with staging of tumor. Rigid probe transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) is reliable in assessing rectal cancer. Both the modalities are associated with an initial learning curve. We evaluated the predictability CUS in preoperative staging of rectal cancer during the learning curve, despite experience with TRUS. Forty-four patients with non-obstructing rectal cancer were assessed by colonoscopy and colonic ultrasound using a 7.5 MHz rotating transducer. Accuracy of ultrasound staging was compared with pathological staging. Tumor staging and nodal staging at pathology and ultrasound were named pT, pN and uT, uN, respectively. The pathological staging was pT1 in two (4.5%), pT2 in 16 (36%), pT3 in 21 (48%) and pT4 in five (11.5%) rectal cancer specimens. CUS understaged the tumor in 11 cases and overstaged it in 10 cases. Overall, the positive predictive value was 61%, negative predictive value 73%, sensitivity 61%, and specificity 73%. Lymph nodes were not visualized in 14. The overall un-weighted kappa of CUS staging of RC was 0.18 (poor). The predictive value in tumor staging of CUS is suboptimal in the learning phase, despite previous experience with TRUS.

Short-term intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis in combination with preoperative oral antibiotics on surgical site infection and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in elective colon cancer surgery: results of a prospective randomized trial

PURPOSE

We performed a prospective randomized study to assess the effectiveness of short-term intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis in combination with preoperative oral antibiotics on a surgical site and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection in elective colon cancer surgery.

METHODS

The patients were administered preoperative oral antibiotics, kanamycin and erythromycin, after mechanical cleansing, which began within 24 h of elective surgery for colon cancer. The patients were randomly assigned to receive the intravenous administration of cefmetazol or cefotiam on the day of surgery (group 1) or for 3 days (group 2). A total of 275 patients (136 for group 1 and 139 for group 2) were eligible for the study.

RESULTS

The incidence of a surgical site infection was 5.1% in group 1 and 6.5% in group 2 (P = 0.80). The incidence of MRSA infection was 2.2% in group 1 and 2.9% in group 2 (P > 0.99). A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score and the duration of surgery were independent significant factors affecting the surgical site infection and MRSA infection.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that short-term intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis in combination with preoperative oral antibiotics may be successfully applied to colon cancer surgery that is generally performed in Japan.

Feasibility of a lateral region sentinel node biopsy of lower rectal cancer guided by indocyanine green using a near-infrared camera system

BACKGROUND

A lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLD) for lower rectal cancer may be beneficial for a limited number of patients. If sentinel node (SN) navigation surgery could be applied to lower rectal cancer, then unnecessary LPLDs could be avoided. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of lateral region SN biopsy by means of indocyanine green (ICG) visualized with a near-infrared camera system (Photodynamic Eye, PDE).

METHODS

This study investigated the existence of a lateral region SN in 25 patients with lower rectal cancer. ICG was injected around the tumor, and the lateral pelvic region was observed with PDE.

RESULTS

With PDE, the lymph nodes and lymph vessels that received ICG appeared as shining fluorescent spots and streams in the fluorescence image. This allowed the detection of not only tumor-negative SNs but also tumor-positive SNs as shining spots. The lateral SNs were detected in 6 of 6 T1 and T2 diseases and 17 of 19 T3 diseases. The lateral SNs were successfully identified in 23 (92%) of the 25 patients. The mean number of lateral SNs per patients was 2.1. Of the 23 patients, 6 patients underwent LPLD. Of the 3 patients who had a tumor-negative SN, all dissected lateral non-SNs were negative in all 3 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

We could detect the lateral SNs, not only in T1 and T2 disease, but also in T3 disease. Although this is only a preliminary study, the detection of lateral SNs in lower rectal cancer by means of the ICG fluorescence imaging system is considered to be a promising technique that may be used for determining the indications for performing LPLD.

Extended lymphadenectomy versus conventional surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Lateral pelvic lymph-node metastases occur in 10-25% of patients with rectal cancer, and are associated with higher local recurrence and reduced survival rates. A meta-analysis was undertaken to assess the value of extended lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy in the operative management of rectal cancer.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, Ovid, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar for studies published between 1965 and 2009 that compared extended lymphadenectomy (EL) with standard rectal resection. 20 studies, which included 5502 patients from one randomised, three prospective non-randomised, and 14 retrospective case-control studies published between 1984 and 2009, met our search criteria and were assessed. 2577 patients underwent EL and 2925 underwent non-EL for rectal cancer. Random and fixed-effects meta-analytical models were used where indicated, and between-study heterogeneity was assessed. End-points evaluated included peri-operative outcomes, 5-year survival and recurrence rates.

FINDINGS

Operating time was significantly longer in the EL group by 76.7 min (95% CI 18.77-134.68; p=0.0096). Intra-operative blood loss was greater in the EL group by 536.5 mL (95% CI 353.7-719.2; p<0.0001). Peri-operative mortality (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.34-1.93; p=0.63) and morbidity (OR 1.45, 95% CI 0.89-2.35; p=0.13) were similar between the two groups. Data from individual studies showed that male sexual dysfunction and urinary dysfunction (three studies: OR 3.70, 95% CI 1.66-8.23; p=0.0012) were more prevalent in the EL group. There were no significant differences in 5-year survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.09, 95% CI 0.78-1.50; p=0.62), 5-year disease-free survival (HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.75-2.03, p=0.41), and local (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.61-1.13; p=0.23) or distant recurrence (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.72-1.21; p=0.60).

INTERPRETATION

Extended lymphadenectomy does not seem to confer a significant overall cancer-specific advantage, but does seem to be associated with increased urinary and sexual dysfunction.

Risk factors of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

To clarify the risk factors of lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) metastasis of rectal cancer, we examined associations between LPLN status and clinicopathological factors including LPLN status diagnosed by computed tomography (CT).

METHODS

We reviewed a total of 210 patients with advanced rectal cancer, of which the lower margin was located at or below the peritoneal reflection, who underwent preoperative CT with 5-mm-thick sections and lateral pelvic lymph node dissection at the National Cancer Center Hospital between February 1998 and March 2006.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients (22.4%) had LPLN metastasis. Multivariate analysis showed that LPLN status diagnosed by CT, pathological regional lymph node status, tumor location, and tumor differentiation were significant risk factors for LPLN metastasis. Among 45 patients with well-differentiated adenocarcinoma who were LPLN-negative and in whom CT had found no regional lymph node metastasis, none had LPLN metastasis. On the other hand, among 13 patients with moderate or less differentiated lower rectal adenocarcinoma who were LPLN-positive and in whom CT had revealed regional lymph node metastasis, 12 (92.3%) had LPLN metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

LPLN status diagnosed by CT, pathological regional LN status, tumor location, and tumor differentiation are significant risk factors for LPLN metastasis. Using these factors, patients can be classified as having a low or high risk of LPLN metastasis.

Clinical evidences of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer

Laparoscopic surgery has widely spread in the treatment of colorectal cancer. In Japan, a nation-wide survey has shown that a rate of advanced colorectal cancer has increased gradually and reached 65% of the total cases for colorectal cancer in 2007. For colon cancer, many randomized controlled trials regarding short-term outcome demonstrate that laparoscopic surgery is feasible, safe and has many benefits including reduction in a peri-operative mortality. In terms of long-term outcome, four randomized controlled trials insist that there are no differences in both laparoscopic and open surgeries. However, there are still more important issues including long-term oncological outcome for advanced colon cancer, cost effectiveness and the impact on quality of life of patients. Meanwhile, for rectal cancer, a controversy persists with regard to the appropriateness of laparoscopic surgery because of concerns over the safety of the procedure and a necessity of lateral lymph node dissection for lower rectal cancer. At present, laparoscopic surgery is acceptable for Stage I colon cancer, whereas there are controversies for Stage II/III colon cancer and each staged rectal cancer because of inadequate clinical evidences. Whether laparoscopic surgery further spreads to be applied for colorectal cancer or not, it would be confirmed by Japanese large-scale phase III trial (JCOG0404) estimating oncological outcome for Stage II/III colon cancer and a Phase II trial estimating the feasibility for Stage 0/I rectal cancer in near future.

Outcomes of surgery alone for lower rectal cancer with and without pelvic sidewall dissection

PURPOSE

The goal of this retrospective multicenter study was to investigate the efficacy of pelvic sidewall dissection for lower rectal cancer.

METHODS

Data from 1,272 consecutive patients who underwent total mesorectal excision for lower rectal cancer in 12 institutions from 1991 through 1998 were reviewed. The rates of local recurrence and survival in patients with pelvic sidewall dissection were compared with those without pelvic sidewall dissection. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis and local recurrence, and the Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Of the 1,272 patients, 784 underwent pelvic sidewall dissection. Among them, 117 patients (14.9 percent) had lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis. Risk factors for lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis included female gender, tumor not well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, and perirectal lymph node metastasis. Lateral pelvic and perirectal lymph node metastases were independent risk factors for local recurrence. The Cox proportional hazard model showed age, grade of histology, invasion depth of the tumor, perirectal lymph node metastasis, and lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis to be independent prognostic factors. No significant differences between patients with and those without pelvic sidewall dissection were seen regarding rates of local recurrence (10.5 percent vs. 7.4 percent) or five-year overall survival (75.8 percent vs. 79.5 percent). Although the proportion of patients with advanced stages of disease was greater in patients who had pelvic sidewall dissection, no differences between the two groups were seen in local recurrence even when tumor category was taken into account. However, lack of pelvic sidewall dissection was a predictor of poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Although pelvic sidewall dissection does not appear to confer overall benefits regarding local recurrence or survival, the effectiveness of pelvic sidewall dissection in specific patient groups remains uncertain. A randomized controlled study is necessary to clarify this issue.

Infralevator lymphatic drainage of low-rectal cancers: preliminary results

BACKGROUND

Some low-rectal cancers may spread into or recur in the inguinal lymph nodes despite optimal resection of the primary tumor. Hence, we hypothesized that lymphatic drainage of low-rectal malignancies may be inhomogeneous and that an extramesorectal route may be involved in at least some cases. The idea of our preliminary study was to analyze the potential lymphatic drainages in low-rectal cancer patients.

METHODS

The first stage of the experiment included two consecutive low-rectal adenocarcinoma patients (free from inguinal lymph node metastases), in whom the lymphatics of the primary tumor were traced with Patentbalu dye. During the second stage the records of 206 consecutive low-rectal cancer patients were analyzed for presence of inguinal lymph node metastases.

RESULTS

An evaluation of specimens from two rectal cancer patients revealed extramesorectal lymphatic drainage of the primary tumor besides the mesorectal route. An analysis of 206 patients revealed six cases of inguinal node metastases. Median age of patients was 55 years. They were all diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma, T3 or T4 tumors with G2 or G3 grade.

CONCLUSION

The demonstration of an alternative route of lymphatic drainage suggests that more radical surgical procedures are necessary for successful treatment of low-rectal cancers.

Local recurrence after abdomino-perineal resection

OBJECTIVE

Local recurrence of rectal cancer is a major cause of morbidity and mortality following curative resection. The published rates vary after abdomino-perineal resection (APR) from 5% to 47%. The aim of this study was to evaluate local recurrence following curative APR for low rectal cancer in our unit.

METHOD

The medical notes of patients treated between 1st January 1996 and 31st December 2000 were retrieved. Local recurrence was defined as the presence of tumour within the pelvis confirmed by clinical findings, pathological specimen or radiological reports. A curative resection was defined as excision of tumour in the absence of macroscopic metastatic disease and whose resection margins were greater than 1 mm circumferentially and 10 mm distally. Outcomes and survival were compared using Fisher's exact test and Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Two hundred consecutive cases with a diagnosis of rectal cancer were identified of which 139 underwent a curative resection (69.5%). Of these 40 patients (28%) underwent APR with curative intent. Two patients (5%) developed local recurrence at 18 and 24 months respectively. The overall local recurrence rate for all curative rectal cancer surgery, in the same period was 2.6%. Eleven patients have died in the follow-up period of which nine were cancer-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

The local recurrence rates achieved with APR were not significantly different from those achieved with restorative operations. Tumours at the ano-rectal junction should not be dissected off the pelvic floor, but radically excised en bloc with the surrounding levator ani, as a cylinder, as originally described by Miles.

[Not Available]

F. Leblanc, C. Laurent E. Rullier Lymph node dissection is a standard part of surgical resection of rectal cancer which helps to avoid local recurrence and allows for accurate staging of the disease. Three types of lymph node dissection have been considered. Mesorectal lymphadenectomy should remove the mesorectum systematically and should extend at least 5cm distal to the tumor. Inferior mesenteric lymphadenectomy should extend at least to the origin of the left colic artery. Lateral lymphadenectomy removing iliac and obturator nodes results in complications and has not been shown to improve survival; it is not routinely recommended. Omission of lymph node dissection is only proposed for the smallest T1 tumors with favorable histology.

[Not Available]

F. Leblanc, C. Laurent E. Rullier Lymph node dissection is a standard part of surgical resection of rectal cancer which helps to avoid local recurrence and allows for accurate staging of the disease. Three types of lymph node dissection have been considered. Mesorectal lymphadenectomy should remove the mesorectum systematically and should extend at least 5cm distal to the tumor. Inferior mesenteric lymphadenectomy should extend at least to the origin of the left colic artery. Lateral lymphadenectomy removing iliac and obturator nodes results in complications and has not been shown to improve survival; it is not routinely recommended. Omission of lymph node dissection is only proposed for the smallest T1 tumors with favorable histology.

Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of rectal well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

To clarify the oncological outcome of rectal well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (W/D NETs), we examined the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of patients with this neoplasm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 23 patients who underwent surgical treatment with lymph node dissection for rectal W/D NETs between 1973 and 2007 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Median tumor size measured preoperatively was 13 mm (range, 4-25 mm), and the median number of dissected lymph nodes was 16 (range, 1-46). The incidence of lymph node metastasis was 61% (14 of 23 cases). The smallest W/D NETs with lymph node metastasis was 10 mm in diameter. All the patients without lymph node metastasis survived without recurrence. Among 11 patients who had only regional lymph node metastasis, only one developed liver metastasis and died 13 months after initial surgery. Among three patients with lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis, two survived more than 5 years, although two had liver metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Because the incidence of lymph node metastasis is very high in patients with rectal W/D NETs greater than 10 mm in diameter, radical surgery is required. In this series, the outcome of rectal W/D NETs patients with lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis was better than expected.

Outcome of patients with clinical stage II or III rectal cancer treated without adjuvant radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

To clarify the indications for preoperative adjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer, the outcome of patients who underwent curative surgery without adjuvant radiotherapy was investigated.

METHODS

A total of 817 consecutive patients who underwent curative surgery for clinical stage II or III rectal cancer without preoperative adjuvant radiotherapy between 1988 and 2002 were reviewed.

RESULTS

The actuarial 5-year local recurrence rate in the examined patients was 6.2%. Univariate analysis showed that sex, pathological T classification (pT), clinical N classification (cN), pathological N classification (pN), tumor site, distance from the anal verge, type of surgery, pathological stage, a positive radical margin, lymphatic invasion, and venous invasion were significantly correlated with local recurrence. Multivariate analysis of preoperative factors identified cN, distance from the anal verge, and sex as statistically significant risk factors for local recurrence. In patients with rectal cancer located less than 5 cm from the anal verge and with positive cN, the local recurrence rate was more than 10%.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with rectal cancer located less than 5 cm from the anal verge and with clinically positive lymph nodes should be given preoperative adjuvant radiotherapy.

Phase II trial to evaluate laparoscopic surgery for Stage 0/I rectal carcinoma

Recently reported randomized controlled trials demonstrated that laparoscopic surgery (LS) was comparable or superior to open surgery with regard to the long-term outcome for colon and rectosigmoidal carcinoma; however, controversy persists with regard to the appropriateness of LS for patients with rectal carcinoma. To examine the technical and oncological feasibility of LS for rectal carcinoma, a phase II trial was started in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of Stage 0/I rectal carcinoma, under the direction of the Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery. Surgeons in 39 specialized institutions will recruit 350 patients. The primary end-point in the first stage is the anastomotic leakage rate by double-stapling technique and that in the second stage is overall survival. Secondary end-points are relapse-free survival, short-term clinical outcome, adverse events, the rate of histologically curative operation, the proportion of completion of LS and the conversion rate.

Does laparoscopic surgery offer adequate clearance in rectal cancer?--A discussion

Currently in the UK, the national institute of clinical excellence (NICE), only advocates laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer as part of commissioned clinical trials. Laparoscopic teaching, training and techniques have evolved greatly and offer many benefits to patients, whilst remaining technically demanding to surgeons still on the slope of the learning curve. Can such minimally invasive techniques be used with the same results as open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer? Are laparoscopic colorectal surgeons able to achieve the same clearance of tumours and so avoid recurrence at the same rate compared to conventional techniques? The discussion to follow, aims to shed some light on such questions and briefly review some of the literature. If laparoscopic anterior resections and abdominoperineal resections achieve the same results as open procedures, then should these techniques be more widely taught and practised? Surely the peri-operative cost of these laparoscopic procedures does not over shadow the potential outcome from much less traumatic surgery?

Prognostic value of lateral lymph node metastasis for advanced low rectal cancer

AIM

To evaluate the risk factors for lateral lymph node metastasis in patients with advanced low rectal cancer, in order to make the effective selection of patients who could benefit from lateral lymph node dissection, as well as the relationship of lateral lymph node metastasis with local recurrence and survival of patients with advanced low rectal cancer.

METHODS

A total of 96 consecutive patients who underwent curative surgery with lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy for advanced lower rectal cancer were retrospectively analyzed. The relation of lateral lymph node metastasis with clinicopathologic characteristics, local recurrence and survival of patients was identified.

RESULTS

Lateral lymph node metastasis was observed in 14.6% (14/96) of patients with advanced low rectal cancer. Lateral lymph node metastasis was detected in 10 (25.0%) of 40 patients with tumor diameter >or= 5 cm and in 4 (7.1%) of 56 patients with tumor diameter < 5 cm. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (c2 = 5.973, P = 0.015). Lateral lymph node metastasis was more frequent in patients with 4/4 diameter of tumor infiltration (7 of 10 cases, 70.0%), compared with patients with 3/4, 2/4 and 1/4 diameter of tumor infiltration (3 of 25 cases, 12.0%; 3 of 45 cases, 6.7%; 1 of 16 cases, 6.3%) (c2 = 27.944, P = 0.0001). The lateral lymph node metastasis rate was 30.0% (9 of 30 cases), 9.1% (4 of 44 cases) and 4.5% (1 of 22 cases) for poorly, moderately and well-differentiated carcinoma, respectively. The difference between the three groups was statistically significant (c2 = 8.569, P = 0.014). Local recurrence was 18.8% (18 of 96 cases), 64.3% (9 of 14 cases), and 11.0% (9 of 82 cases) in patients with advanced low rectal cancer, in those with and without lateral lymph node metastasis, respectively. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (c2 = 22.308, P = 0.0001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed significant improvements in median survival (80.9 +/- 2.1 m, 95% CI: 76.7-85.1 m vs 38 +/- 6.7 m, 95% CI: 24.8-51.2 m) of patients without lateral lymph node metastasis compared with those with lateral lymph node metastasis (log-rank, P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Tumor diameter, infiltration and differentiation are significant risk factors for lateral lymph node metastasis. Lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy should be performed following surgery for patients with tumor diameter >or= 5 cm. Lateral lymph node metastasis is an important predictor for local recurrence and survival in patients with advanced low rectal cancer.

The incidence of lateral pelvic side-wall nodal involvement in low rectal cancer may be similar in Japan and the West

BACKGROUND

There is an East-West divide with regard to the frequency, significance and management of lateral pelvic side-wall nodes associated with low rectal cancer. In Japan, removal of nodes is considered essential in curative treatment of selected patients. In the West, involved nodes are generally considered as metastatic disease. There may be international differences in rectal cancer behaviour.

METHODS

A review of relevant studies was undertaken using PubMed, Cochrane Library and personal archives of references; further cross-referencing was conducted. Historical developments, relevant anatomy and reports on lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy (LPLD) were identified. Outcomes following LPLD were assessed.

RESULTS

The low rectum has lateral lymphatic drainage. Enhanced pelvic imaging techniques suggest that some patients with low rectal cancer have lateral pelvic lymph node involvement. However, there is no universal agreement on the definition of either the rectum or low rectal cancer. Selective use of LPLD has led to good outcomes in Japan. An alternative strategy might be neoadjuvant therapy for involved lateral nodes.

CONCLUSION

Pelvic imaging and correlation with pathological findings are crucial in the assessment of lateral pelvic side-wall nodes. East and West should combine their experience of preoperative staging, surgical treatment and pathological assessment of low rectal cancer.

The TME trial after a median follow-up of 6 years: increased local control but no survival benefit in irradiated patients with resectable rectal carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of preoperative short-term radiotherapy in patients with mobile rectal cancer undergoing total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Local recurrence is a major problem in rectal cancer treatment. Preoperative short-term radiotherapy has shown to improve local control and survival in combination with conventional surgery. The TME trial investigated the value of this regimen in combination with total mesorectal excision. Long-term results are reported after a median follow-up of 6 years.

METHODS

One thousand eight hundred and sixty-one patients with resectable rectal cancer were randomized between TME preceded by 5 x 5 Gy or TME alone. No chemotherapy was allowed. There was no age limit. Surgery, radiotherapy, and pathologic examination were standardized. Primary endpoint was local control.

RESULTS

Median follow-up of surviving patients was 6.1 year. Five-year local recurrence risk of patients undergoing a macroscopically complete local resection was 5.6% in case of preoperative radiotherapy compared with 10.9% in patients undergoing TME alone (P < 0.001). Overall survival at 5 years was 64.2% and 63.5%, respectively (P = 0.902). Subgroup analyses showed significant effect of radiotherapy in reducing local recurrence risk for patients with nodal involvement, for patients with lesions between 5 and 10 cm from the anal verge, and for patients with uninvolved circumferential resection margins.

CONCLUSIONS

With increasing follow-up, there is a persisting overall effect of preoperative short-term radiotherapy on local control in patients with clinically resectable rectal cancer. However, there is no effect on overall survival. Since survival is mainly determined by distant metastases, efforts should be directed towards preventing systemic disease.

Prognostic value of lateral lymph node metastasis for advanced low rectal cancer

AIM: To evaluate the risk factors for lateral lymph node metastasis in patients with advanced low rectal cancer, in order to make the effective selection of patients who could benefit from lateral lymph node dissection, as well as the relationship of lateral lymph node metastasis with local recurrence and survival of patients with advanced low rectal cancer.

METHODS: A total of 96 consecutive patients who underwent curative surgery with lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy for advanced lower rectal cancer were retrospectively analyzed. The relation of lateral lymph node metastasis with clinicopathologic characteristics, local recurrence and survival of patients was identified.

RESULTS: Lateral lymph node metastasis was observed in 14.6% (14/96) of patients with advanced low rectal cancer. Lateral lymph node metastasis was detected in 10 (25.0%) of 40 patients with tumor diameter ≥ 5 cm and in 4 (7.1%) of 56 patients with tumor diameter < 5 cm. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (χ² = 5.973, P = 0.015). Lateral lymph node metastasis was more frequent in patients with 4/4 diameter of tumor infiltration (7 of 10 cases, 70.0%), compared with patients with 3/4, 2/4 and 1/4 diameter of tumor infiltration (3 of 25 cases, 12.0%; 3 of 45 cases, 6.7%; 1 of 16 cases, 6.3%) (χ² = 27.944, P = 0.0001). The lateral lymph node metastasis rate was 30.0% (9 of 30 cases), 9.1% (4 of 44 cases) and 4.5% (1 of 22 cases) for poorly, moderately and well-differentiated carcinoma, respectively. The difference between the three groups was statistically significant (χ² = 8.569, P = 0.014). Local recurrence was 18.8% (18 of 96 cases), 64.3% (9 of 14 cases), and 11.0% (9 of 82 cases) in patients with advanced low rectal cancer, in those with and without lateral lymph node metastasis, respectively. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (χ² = 22.308, P = 0.0001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed significant improvements in median survival (80.9 ± 2.1 m, 95% CI: 76.7-85.1 m vs 38 ± 6.7 m, 95% CI: 24.8-51.2 m) of patients without lateral lymph node metastasis compared with those with lateral lymph node metastasis (log-rank, P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION: Tumor diameter, infiltration and differentiation are significant risk factors for lateral lymph node metastasis. Lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy should be performed following surgery for patients with tumor diameter ≥ 5 cm. Lateral lymph node metastasis is an important predictor for local recurrence and survival in patients with advanced low rectal cancer.

Lateral lymph node metastasis is a major cause of locoregional recurrence in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and curative resection

BACKGROUND

In rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and curative resection, we evaluated the effect of clinical parameters on lateral pelvic recurrence and made an attempt to identify a risk factor for lateral pelvic recurrence.

METHODS

The study involved 366 patients who underwent preoperative CRT and curative resection between October 2001 and December 2005. Clinical parameters such as gender, age, tumor size, histologic type, cT and cN classification, ypT and ypN classification, circumferential resection margin, tumor regression grade, chemotherapeutic regimen, and lateral lymph node size were analyzed to identify risk factors associated with lateral pelvic recurrence.

RESULTS

Of the 366 patients, 29 patients (7.9%) had locoregional recurrence: 6 (20.7%) with central pelvic recurrence and 24 (82.7%) had lateral pelvic recurrence, of which 1 had simultaneous central and lateral pelvic recurrence. Multivariate analysis showed that ypN classification and lateral lymph node size were significantly associated with lateral pelvic recurrence (P < .001). Of 250 ypN0 patients, lateral pelvic recurrence developed in 1.4%, 2.9%, and 50% of patients with lateral lymph node sizes of < 5, 5-9.9, and > or = 10 mm, respectively (P < .001). Of 116 ypN+ patients, lateral pelvic recurrence developed in 4.3%, 35.7%, and 87.5% of patients with lateral lymph node sizes of < 5, 5-9.9, and > or = 10 mm, respectively (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, lateral pelvic recurrence was a major cause of locoregional recurrence, and ypN+ and lateral lymph node size were risk factors for lateral pelvic recurrence.