Phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study of zibotentan (ZD4054) in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer metastatic to bone

Bone-targeting agents in prostate cancer

Bone metastases are present in the vast majority of men with advanced prostate cancer, representing the main cause for morbidity and mortality. Recurrent or metastatic disease is managed initially with androgen deprivation but the majority of the patients eventually will progress to castration-resistant prostate cancer, with patients developing bone metastases in most of the cases. Survival and growth of the metastatic prostate cancer cells is dependent on a complex microenvironment (onco-niche) that includes the osteoblasts, the osteoclasts, the endothelium, and the stroma. This review summarizes agents that target the pathways involved in this complex interaction between prostate cancer and bone microenvironment and aim to transform lethal metastatic prostate cancer into a chronic disease.

Current state of endothelin receptor antagonism in hypertension and pulmonary hypertension

Endothelin 1 (ET-1), a potent vasoconstrictive substance, was discovered in 1988 by Yanagisawa and colleagues, and since then, a quarter of a century has passed. Understanding the biology of ET-1 has rapidly developed by characterizing the components of its receptors and processing enzymes. Numerous studies have revealed not only physiological but also various pathophysiological roles of the ET system. At first, ET-1 was the attractive and promising target for the treatment of hypertension owing to its potent vasoconstrictive nature and a variety of ET receptor antagonists (ERAs) were studied. However, the clinical application to treat hypertension was disappointing because of the side effects, including liver toxicity and fluid retention. On the other hand, ERAs have been established as orphan drugs for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension and improved the prognosis of patients. Furthermore, multipotency of the ET system in the pathogenesis of multiple diseases has led to the development of translational research not only in the field of hypertension but in a variety of fields. Furthermore, a range of studies are ongoing to apply ERAs to clinical situations. In this article, we review the pathophysiological roles of the ET system in hypertension and pulmonary hypertension and the potential of ET receptor antagonism for the treatment of these diseases.

Managing bone metastases and reducing skeletal related events in prostate cancer

Advanced-stage prostate cancer is associated with skeletal complications related to metastatic disease and its treatment. On the one hand, metastatic disease to bone is commonly associated with skeletal-related events (SREs); on the other hand, treatment with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) leads to loss in bone mineral density (BMD) and increased risk of fracture. Despite osteoblastic appearance on radiography, bone metastases from prostate cancer are associated with increased osteoblast and osteoclast activity providing the rationale for treatment with osteoclast-targeted agents. The bisphosphonate zoledronic acid and the monoclonal antibody denosumab reduce the incidence of SREs in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). A number of agents prevent loss of BMD associated with ADT, but only denosumab is approved to reduce fractures in patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer. Another recently approved agent-radium-223-improves survival and delays SREs in mCRPC. The inhibitors of androgen receptor signalling, abiraterone and enzalutamide, improve survival in mCRPC and delay SREs, although the latter is likely related to control of disease rather than a direct effect on bone. Finally, the tyrosine kinase inhibitor cabozantinib shows promising activity in bone metastases from mCRPC. This Review addresses the skeletal morbidity associated with prostate cancer and the therapeutic options that exist to treat it.

Estimating scenarios for survival time in men starting systemic therapies for castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review of randomised trials

BACKGROUND

We sought to estimate worst-case, typical and best-case scenarios for survival in men starting systemic therapies for castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

METHODS

We sought randomised phase 3 trials of systemic therapies for CRPC and recorded the following percentiles (represented scenario) from Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS) curves: 90th (worst-case), 75th (lower-typical), 50th (median), 25th (upper-typical) and 10th (best-case). We determined the accuracy of using simple multiples of the median OS to estimate the other selected percentiles from each curve: 0.25 for 90th, 0.5 for 75th, 2 for 25th and 3 for 10th. Estimates were deemed accurate if within 0.75-1.33 times the actual value.

FINDINGS

We reviewed 23 trials (13,909 men) with 48 treatment groups including 28 of chemotherapy, and three of novel hormonal agents. In trials of first-line docetaxel, the mean (interquartile range) for median OS was 19 months (17-20), and for each scenario was: worst-case 7 months (6-8); lower-typical 12 months (11-13); upper-typical 29 months (27-31); and best-case 40 months (34-44). For trials of novel hormonal agents after chemotherapy the mean values were: median OS 17 months, worst-case 5 months, lower-typical 9 months, upper-typical 24 months and best-case not reported. Simple multiples of the median gave accurate estimates of the worst-case scenario in 72% of OS curves, lower-typical in 89%, upper-typical in 84% and best-case in 84%.

INTERPRETATION

Simple multiples of the median OS from randomised trials provided accurate estimates of worst-case, typical and best-case scenarios for survival time in men starting systemic therapies for CRPC.

Recent advances in bone-targeted therapies of metastatic prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is one of the most common malignancies affecting men worldwide, with bone being the most common site of metastasis in patients that progress beyond organ confinement. Bone metastases are virtually incurable and result in significant disease morbidity and mortality. Bone provides a unique microenvironment whose local interactions with tumor cells offer novel targets for therapeutic interventions. Several attractive molecules or pathways have been identified as new potential therapeutic targets for bone metastases caused by metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. In this review, we present the recent advances in molecular targeted therapies for prostate cancer bone metastasis focusing on therapies that target the bone cells and the bone microenvironment. The therapies covered in this review include agents that inhibit bone resorption, agents that stimulate bone formation, and agents that target the bone matrix. Suggestions to devise more effective molecular targeted therapies are proposed. Hopefully, with better understanding of the biology of the disease and the development of more robust targeted therapies, the survival and quality of life of the affected individuals could be significantly improved.

Validation of histological diagnostic methods for detecting endothelin B receptor expression

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has an extremely poor prognosis. Recently, it was reported that the endothelin B receptor (ETBR) of tumor endothelial cells prevents antitumor immunity. However, the immuno-histochemistry (IHC) conditions required to detect ETBR expression remain unclear. The aim of the present study was to confirm the appropriate conditions for IHC for ETBR using ETBR cDNA and transfectant cells and to assess ETBR expression in PDAC patients. An ETBR-expressing cell was established as an objective positive control and the detectability of ETBR expression was evaluated using several types of anti-ETBR antibodies. ETBR mRNA expression was then studied. Finally, ETBR expression was examined in human PDAC tissue using IHC. As a result, four different anti-ETBR antibodies recognized the cell surface ETBR appropriately. A non-specific reaction was shown in the detection of ETBR in normal human tissues. ETBR mRNA expression was weakly detected only in the adrenal gland. No biologically significant correlation was observed in the ETBR-IHC of human PDAC sections. In conclusion, it is necessary to perform IHC using an appropriate control to assess the tissue expression of ETBR.

Molecular alterations and emerging targets in castration resistant prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in Western Europe, of which approximately 10-20% presents with advanced or metastatic disease. Initial response with androgen deprivation therapy is almost universal, but progression to castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), an incurable disease, occurs in approximately 2-3 years. In recent years, the novel taxane cabazitaxel, the hormonal agents abiraterone and enzalutamide, the immunotherapeutic agent sipuleucel-T and the radiopharmaceutical radium-223 have been shown to prolong survival in large randomised trials, thus widely increasing the therapeutic armamentarium against the disease. Despite these advances, the median survival in the first-line setting of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is still up to 25 months and in the post-docetaxel setting is about 15-18 months. There is an urgent need for the development of biomarkers of treatment response, and for a deeper understanding of tumour heterogeneity and the molecular biology underlying the disease. In this review, we attempt to provide insight into the novel molecular targets showing promise in clinical trials.

Predictors of congestive heart failure after treatment with an endothelin receptor antagonist

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The Avosentan on Time to Doubling of Serum Creatinine, End Stage Renal Disease or Death (ASCEND) trial tested the renoprotective effect of the endothelin receptor antagonist avosentan in patients with diabetes and nephropathy, but the study was terminated due to an excess of congestive heart failure (CHF) events in the avosentan arms, likely due to fluid retention. The aim of this study was to identify risk markers of CHF after treatment with avosentan.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

In a post hoc analysis of the ASCEND trial (N=1392 participants), we assessed which baseline characteristics predicted CHF risk during avosentan treatment. Furthermore, postrandomization changes between baseline and the first available measurement of body weight and hemoglobin were examined as potential clinical indicators of fluid retention for their relationship with CHF development.

RESULTS

Relative to placebo, avosentan increased CHF risk (hazard ratio, 2.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.68 to 4.54). The avosentan-related CHF risk was higher with lower baseline cholesterol levels (P interaction=0.003) and concomitant statin use (P interaction=0.06), whereas it was lower with a lower estimated GFR (P interaction=0.04). Patients allocated to avosentan had a median body weight increase of 0.6 kg (interquartile range, 0.0 to 2.0 kg) and a median hemoglobin decrease of 1.4 g/dl (interquartile range, -2.1 to -0.7 g/dl) at the first postrandomization measurement. The body weight increase induced by avosentan was associated with CHF development (P interaction=0.04), whereas hemoglobin decrease was not (P interaction=0.64). The increase in body weight was particularly pronounced in patients with a cardiovascular disease history and in patients using statins.

CONCLUSIONS

In avosentan-treated patients, body weight increase, but not hemoglobin decrease, was associated with CHF development, indicating that close body weight monitoring could provide an early signal of CHF development in future trials with endothelin receptor antagonists.

Long-term survival and biomarker correlates of tasquinimod efficacy in a multicenter randomized study of men with minimally symptomatic metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Tasquinimod (Active Biotech) is an oral immunomodulatory, anti-angiogenic, and anti-metastatic agent that delayed metastatic disease progression in a randomized placebo-controlled phase II trial in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Here, we report long-term survival with biomarker correlates from this trial.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Two hundred and one (134 tasquinimod and 67 placebo) men with mCRPC were evaluated. Forty-one men randomized to placebo crossed over to tasquinimod. Survival data were collected with a median follow-up time of 37 months. Exploratory biomarker studies at baseline and over time were collected to evaluate potential mechanism-based correlates with tasquinimod efficacy including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

With 111 mortality events, median OS was 33.4 months for tasquinimod versus 30.4 months for placebo overall, and 34.2 versus 27.1 months in men with bone metastases (n = 136), respectively. Multivariable analysis demonstrated an adjusted HR of 0.52 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.35-0.78; P = 0.001] for PFS and 0.64 (95% CI, 0.42-0.97; P = 0.034) for OS, favoring tasquinimod. Time-to-symptomatic progression was improved with tasquinimod (P = 0.039, HR = 0.42). Toxicities tended to be mild in nature and improved over time. Biomarker analyses suggested a favorable impact on bone alkaline phosphatase and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) over time and a transient induction of inflammatory biomarkers, VEGF-A, and thrombospondin-1 levels with tasquinimod. Baseline levels of thrombospondin-1 less than the median were predictive of treatment benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

The survival observed in this trial of men with minimally symptomatic mCRPC suggests that the prolongation in PFS with tasquinimod may lead to a survival advantage in this setting, particularly among men with skeletal metastases, and has a favorable risk:benefit ratio.

Novel therapeutic approaches for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is a leading cause of cancer death in men in developed countries. Once the tumor has achieved a castration-refractory metastatic stage, treatment options are limited with the average survival of patients ranging from two to three years only. Recently, new drugs for treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) have been approved, and others are in an advanced stage of clinical testing. In this review we provide an overview of the new therapeutic agents that arrived in the clinical praxis or are tested in clinical studies and their mode of action including hormone synthesis inhibitors, new androgen receptor blockers, bone targeting and antiangiogenic agents, endothelin receptor antagonists, growth factor inhibitors, novel radiotherapeutics and taxanes, and immunotherapeutic approaches. Results and limitations from clinical studies as well as future needs for improvement of CRPC treatments are critically discussed.

Endothelin 1 in cancer: biological implications and therapeutic opportunities

Activation of autocrine and paracrine signalling by endothelin 1 (ET1) binding to its receptors elicits pleiotropic effects on tumour cells and on the host microenvironment. This activation modulates cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, chemoresistance and neovascularization, thus providing a strong rationale for targeting ET1 receptors in cancer. In this Review, we discuss the advances in our understanding of the diverse biological roles of ET1 in cancer and describe the latest preclinical and clinical progress that has been made using small-molecule antagonists of ET1 receptors that inhibit ET1-driven signalling.

Recent advances revolutionize treatment of metastatic prostate cancer

In 2004, the chemotherapy agent docetaxel was approved for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. Although it has taken almost a decade, significant new advances have been made in this area, including the clinical development of modern hormonal therapies, such as abiraterone and enzalutamide, and immunotherapies, such as sipuleucel-T, all of which have improved survival in metastatic prostate cancer. These agents have not only provided new therapeutic options for patients with advanced disease, they have also spurred research in both androgen receptor-targeting therapy and immunotherapy. Future trials will focus on the optimal sequence of these and other emerging therapies, with the aim of using these treatments earlier in the disease course (including the adjuvant setting) to enhance clinical benefit and potentially increase the cure rate for prostate cancer.

Docetaxel and atrasentan versus docetaxel and placebo for men with advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer (SWOG S0421): a randomised phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

The endothelin pathway has a role in bone metastases, which are characteristic of advanced prostate cancer. Atrasentan, an endothelin receptor antagonist, has shown activity in prostate cancer. We therefore assessed its effect on survival in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer with bone metastases.

METHODS

In a double-blind phase 3 trial, men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, stratified for progression type (prostate-specific antigen or radiological), baseline pain, extraskeletal metastases, and bisphosphonate use, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to docetaxel (75 mg/m(2) every 21 days, intravenously) with atrasentan (10 mg/day, orally) or placebo for up to 12 cycles and treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients who did not progress on treatment were permitted to continue atrasentan or placebo for up to 52 weeks. Coprimary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00134056.

FINDINGS

498 patients were randomly assigned to the atrasentan group and 496 to the placebo group. The trial was halted early for futility in April, 2011, after a planned interim analysis. Median PFS was 9·2 months (95% CI 8·5-9·9) in the atrasentan group and 9·1 months (8·4-10·2) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 1·02, 0·89-1·16; p=0·81). Median overall survival was 17·8 months (16·4-19·8) in the atrasentan group versus 17·6 months (16·4-20·1) in the placebo group (1·04, 0·90-1·19; p=0·64). 278 (57%) of 492 patients in the atrasentan group had grade 3 and greater toxicity compared with 294 (60%) of 486 in the placebo group (p=0·22). Three deaths in the atrasentan group and seven in the placebo group were judged to be possibly or probably due to protocol treatment.

INTERPRETATION

Atrasentan, when added to docetaxel, does not improve overall survival or PFS in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases; therefore, single-agent docetaxel should remain as one of the standard treatments.

FUNDED

National Cancer Institute, Sanofi-Aventis, and Abbott Laboratories.

Cell mates: paracrine and stromal targets for prostate cancer therapy

After many years of limited treatment options for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), multiple systemic therapies are now available, providing patients with significant improvements in survival, symptom control and bone health. Most of the recent advances in this area have been based on better understanding of mCRPC biology, particularly with respect to the key role of androgen receptor signalling. However, most therapies are targeted towards the malignant epithelial cell component of the cancer and it should not be forgotten that cancer cells exist in close and symbiotic relationships with other components of the tumour. Paracrine and stromal signals are often critical to the growth of the cancer and represent new potential therapeutic targets that are separate from the malignant epithelial cells. The stroma produces numerous growth factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor family members, platelet-derived growth factors and fibroblast growth factors, which are all critical for tumour growth. Targeting prostate-cancer-associated fibroblasts in order to destroy the physical and functional scaffold of a cancer is also a logical approach. The interaction between prostate cancer and the immune system remains an active topic of basic and clinical research, with cytokines, chemokines and growth factors being potential targets for therapy. The biology of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and of circulating tumour cells might also provide insight into new therapeutic targets.

Bone targeted therapies in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is the most common male cancer. About 90% of metastatic patients will develop bone metastases. Bone disease is responsible of pain, deterioration of quality of life and serious bone complications. Proliferation of prostate cancer cells in the bone marrow induces osteoclast activation and osteolysis. Targeting the bone microenvironment reduces morbidity. Relevant preclinical and clinical studies of bone-targeted therapies in castration-resistant prostate cancer were identified in PubMed and clinical trial databases. Different drugs are available or in development that target bone resorption (bisphosphonates, RANK ligand inhibitors), bone formation (endothelin 1 inhibitors), cancer cell migration (SRC-family kinase inhibitors, vascular endothelial growth factor-MET inhibitors), and survival (radiopharmaceuticals). In phase III trials, zoledronic acid, denosumab, and radium-223 were shown to significantly delay skeletal-related events. Radium-223 was also shown to improve overall survival. Biomarkers of bone resorption (urinary N-telopeptide) and bone making (alkaline phosphatase) have an independent prognostic impact. Targeting the bone microenvironment is an important component of castration-resistant prostate cancer management to reduce bone complications and improve overall survival. Biomarkers of bone turnover have an independent prognostic impact.

Emerging therapies in metastatic castration-sensitive and castration-resistant prostate cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Therapeutic options for men with metastatic prostate cancer are expanding. Here we discuss the scientific progress in this disease that led to approval of several agents in the last decade and highlight ongoing clinical investigation.

RECENT FINDINGS

In androgen-sensitive disease, trials are evaluating the role of intermittent androgen-deprivation therapy, early chemotherapy, and novel targeted and hormonal therapies. For chemotherapy-naive, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), abiraterone is effective. Trials with additional agents targeting androgen receptor (AR) signaling, such as TAK-700 and enzalutamide, are ongoing. Other agents in development target the endothelin pathway, angiogenesis, AR chaperones, and immune mechanisms. Docetaxel with prednisone remains the standard first-line chemotherapeutic regimen as trials incorporating novel agents with docetaxel have been negative. Postdocetaxel, enzalutamide improves survival. Early results with cabozantinib are encouraging, and phase III studies are ongoing. Denosumab and radium-223 reduce the risk of skeletal-related events (SREs), but only radium-223 improves survival.

SUMMARY

Progress in understanding the disease biology and mechanisms of castration resistance led to significant therapeutic advancements, particularly in the setting of mCRPC in which several phase III trials, each incorporating agents with different mechanisms of action, have improved survival. As a result, new options exist, and the standard of care has changed significantly. Further advances are anticipated.

Antimitotic agents for the treatment of patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

Metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is the second deadliest cancer in men. The group of taxanes, which target microtubules of mitotic cells, is currently the only chemotherapy which has proven to increase overall survival in mCRPC patients. Other mitotic inhibitors are being explored for their clinical potential in mCRPC treatment.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we summarize recent developments in the application of mitotic inhibitors for mCRPC from a clinical perspective. The four main groups of mitotic inhibitors currently being tested in clinical trials are microtubule-inhibitors, polo-like kinase 1 inhibitors, aurora kinase inhibitors and kinesin-spindle protein inhibitors. Compounds of these groups of inhibitors that are in clinical development for mCRPC are discussed. For this extensive overview, relevant literature was searched in PubMed and retrieved from clinicaltrials.gov and presentations at ASCO/AACR meetings.

EXPERT OPINION

In general, mitotic inhibitors are clinically well tolerated but exert limited antitumor activity compared to preclinical study results. However, efficacy of mitotic inhibitors is improving, either by personalizing treatment, by introducing more active compounds, by decreasing resistance of cancer cells against mitotic inhibitors or by using mitotic inhibitors in combination therapies.

Evolving landscape and novel treatments in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer

Treatment options for castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) have advanced in recent years and significantly improved the outlook for patients with this aggressive and lethal disease. Further understanding of the biology of CRPC has led to several new targeted therapies and continues to emphasize the importance of androgen receptor (AR) directed therapy. The treatment landscape is rapidly changing and further biologically rationale, biomarker-based ongoing clinical trials are needed. We review the recent results of major clinical trials in CRPC. New and investigational agents now in clinical evaluation are reviewed including inhibitors of angiogenesis, microtubules, chaperones, AR and intracellular kinases, as well as immunotherapy, radiopharmaceuticals and bone-targeted agents. The recent improvement in prognosis for CRPC brings continued optimism for further improvements. Thoughtful planning of clinical trials and further understanding of the mechanisms of resistance to therapies will allow for continued progress in patient care.

Phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled study of docetaxel in combination with zibotentan in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

PURPOSE As part of the ENTHUSE (Endothelin A Use) program, the efficacy and safety of zibotentan (ZD4054), an oral specific endothelin A receptor antagonist, has been investigated in combination with docetaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study, patients received intravenous docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 of 21-day cycles plus oral zibotentan 10 mg or placebo once daily. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included time to pain and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression, pain and PSA response, progression-free survival, health-related quality of life, and safety. Results A total of 1,052 patients received study treatment (docetaxel-zibotentan, n = 524; docetaxel-placebo, n = 528). At the time of data cutoff, there had been 277 and 280 deaths, respectively. There was no difference in OS for patients receiving docetaxel-zibotentan compared with those receiving docetaxel-placebo (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.18; P = .963). No significant differences were observed on secondary end points, including time to pain progression (median 9.3 v 10.0 months, respectively) or pain response (odds ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.16; P = .283). The median time to death was 20.0 and 19.2 months for the zibotentan and placebo groups, respectively. The most commonly reported adverse events in zibotentan-treated patients were peripheral edema (52.7%), diarrhea (35.4%), alopecia (33.9%), and nausea (33.3%). CONCLUSION Docetaxel plus zibotentan 10 mg/d did not result in a significant improvement in OS compared with docetaxel plus placebo in patients with metastatic CRPC.

Immunotherapy and endothelin receptor antagonists for treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer

Recently, novel therapies of prostate cancer, such as immunotherapy, endothelin receptor antagonists, novel androgen receptor antagonist and novel taxanes, and others have been introduced into clinical practice. This study was performed to summarize these results of immunotherapy and endothelin receptor antagonists in the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and derive a more precise estimation of their effect on future treatment. The PubMed database, references of published trials, and review articles were searched. Two reviewers independently extracted data of these trials. We used hazard ratios (HRs) to assess the effects on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), or time to disease progression (TTP), and relative risk (RR) for the different types of toxicity. In addition, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) give a sense of the precision of the estimate. Nine randomized controlled trials were ultimately identified. The pooled HR showed that immunotherapy could prolong OS significantly in patients with CRPC compared to placebo (HR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.58-0.83, p < 0.001). Endothelin receptor antagonists also had modest benefits (HR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.82-1.00, p = 0.046). Nevertheless, there were no significant benefits from both therapies on PFS or TTP. In addition, immunotherapy led to more fatigue, pyrexia, chills, and endothelin receptor antagonists led to more peripheral edema, anemia, and dyspnea. Our article suggested that the very acceptable toxicity and improving OS in patients with CRPC made immunotherapy an attractive option for such patients. However, future studies with thoughtful clinical trial designs are warranted.

Treatment options in castration-resistant prostate cancer: current therapies and emerging docetaxel-based regimens

BACKGROUND

Docetaxel-based chemotherapy remains the standard of care for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and it is the only globally approved first-line therapy. Although docetaxel offers improved survival for this patient population, it is also associated with toxicity and resistance in many patients, representing a need for more efficacious therapies. Preclinical advances have led to improved understanding of the molecular biology of prostate cancer, and targeted therapies that exploit the signaling pathways and molecular targets that underscore the disease are being clinically investigated in combination with docetaxel.

DESIGN

This article briefly highlights recent data from phase III trials in mCRPC that have led to agent approval. This article also reviews phase II and III trials in which docetaxel-based regimens have been investigated in mCRPC.

RESULTS

Recently approved agents, including sipuleucel-T, cabazitaxel, abiraterone acetate, and enzalutamide, have diversified the mCRPC treatment landscape. Phase III trials evaluating docetaxel in combination with targeted therapies, including potent oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, dasatinib, in the READY trial and clusterin inhibitor, custirsen, in the SYNERGY trial, are currently ongoing.

CONCLUSIONS

In combination with docetaxel, targeted agents dasatinib and custirsen will likely expand the existing treatment paradigm for mCRPC if results from phase III trials are positive.

Long-term use of dasatinib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after receiving the combination of dasatinib and docetaxel

Dasatinib is a potent oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor which targets several kinases, including the SRC family kinases. SRC family kinases have been implicated in androgen therapy resistance that often develops in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), which drives the need for non-androgen targeting therapies. This article describes the preclinical rationale for the use of combination dasatinib and docetaxel therapy in mCRPC, and highlights the results of a phase I–II trial in which 46 patients with mCRPC, treated with a regimen of dasatinib and docetaxel, demonstrated improvements in bone scans, high rates of soft tissue responses, and modulation of markers of bone turnover. This brief report discusses in detail follow-up data on two patients who remain alive after >2.5 years on dasatinib single-agent therapy after discontinuing docetaxel treatment.

Validation and clinical utility of prostate cancer biomarkers

To improve future drug development and patient management for patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), surrogate biomarkers that are linked to relevant outcomes are urgently needed. A biomarker must be measurable, reproducible, linked to relevant clinical outcomes, and demonstrate clinical utility. This area is rapidly evolving, with recent trials in patients with CRPC incorporating the detection of circulating tumour cells (CTCs), imaging, and patient-reported outcome biomarkers. We discuss the framework for the development of biomarkers for CRPC, including different categories and contexts of use. We also highlight the requirements of analytical validation, the sequence of trials needed for clinical validation and regulatory approval, and the future outlook for imaging and CTC biomarkers.

Phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled study of once-daily oral zibotentan (ZD4054) in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Standard treatment options are limited for the management of non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). This study, part of the ENTHUSE (EndoTHelin A USE) phase III programme, evaluated the efficacy and safety of the oral specific endothelin (ET)A receptor antagonist zibotentan vs placebo in patients with non-metastatic CRPC (non-mCRPC).

METHODS

This was a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, phase III study. Patients (n=1421) with non-mCRPC and biochemical progression (determined by rising serum PSA levels) were randomized to receive zibotentan 10 mg or placebo once daily. Based on the lack of efficacy signal in another ENTHUSE phase III study, an interim analysis was performed to determine whether the study was likely to achieve the co-primary objectives of improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Criteria for continuation of this study were not met. A total of 79 deaths and 293 progression events were recorded at final data cutoff. Zibotentan-treated patients did not significantly differ from placebo-treated patients for OS (hazard ratio (HR): 1.13; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73-1.76, P=0.589) or PFS (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.71-1.12, P=0.330). The most commonly reported adverse events in zibotentan-treated patients were peripheral oedema (37.7%), headache (26.2%) and nasal congestion (24.9%); each occurred with >15% higher incidence than in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial was terminated early because of failure at interim analysis of the efficacy data to meet the defined criteria for continuation. Owing to the absence of demonstrable survival benefits in the ENTHUSE clinical studies, zibotentan is no longer under investigation as a potential treatment for prostate cancer.

Clinical trials with endothelin receptor antagonists: what went wrong and where can we improve?

In the early 1990s, within three years of cloning of endothelin receptors, orally active endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) were tested in humans and the first clinical trial of ERA therapy in humans was published in 1995. ERAs were subsequently tested in clinical trials involving heart failure, pulmonary arterial hypertension, resistant arterial hypertension, stroke/subarachnoid hemorrhage and various forms of cancer. The results of most of these trials - except those for pulmonary arterial hypertension and scleroderma-related digital ulcers - were either negative or neutral. Problems with study design, patient selection, drug toxicity, and drug dosing have been used to explain or excuse failures. Currently, a number of pharmaceutical companies who had developed ERAs as drug candidates have discontinued clinical trials or further drug development. Given the problems with using ERAs in clinical medicine, at the Twelfth International Conference on Endothelin in Cambridge, UK, a panel discussion was held by clinicians actively involved in clinical development of ERA therapy in renal disease, systemic and pulmonary arterial hypertension, heart failure, and cancer. This article provides summaries from the panel discussion as well as personal perspectives of the panelists on how to proceed with further clinical testing of ERAs and guidance for researchers and decision makers in clinical drug development on where future research efforts might best be focused.