Psychological distress associated with cancer screening: A systematic review

Psychological impact of different primary treatments for prostate cancer: A critical analysis

Limited attention has been given to the psychological impact of primary treatments in patients with prostate cancer. Aim of our analysis was to critically analyse the current evidence on the psychological impact of different primary treatments (surgery, radiotherapy and active surveillance), in patients with prostate cancer, using validated questionnaires. We searched in the MEDLINE and Cochrane library database from the literature of the past 15 years (primary fields: prostate neoplasm, AND radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy or active surveillance AND psychological distress or anxiety or depression; secondary fields: urinary, sexual, bowel modifications, non-randomised and randomised trials). Overall eighteen original and review articles were included and critically evaluated. Either radical prostatectomy or active surveillance and radiotherapy are well-tolerated in terms of definite anxiety and depression during the post-treatment follow-up. A mutual influence between functional and psychological modifications induced by treatments has been demonstrated. Urinary symptoms related to incontinence more than sexual and bowel dysfunction are able to induce psychological distress worsening. In conclusion, patients and their clinicians might wish to know how functional and psychological aspects may differently be influenced by treatment choice.

Psychosocial consequences of skin cancer screening

Screening for melanoma may save lives, but may also cause patient distress. One key reason that preventative visual skin examinations for skin cancer are not currently recommended is the inadequate available evidence to assess potential harm to psychosocial wellbeing. We investigated potential psychological harms and benefits of skin examinations by conducting telephone surveys in 2015 of 187 screened participants; all were ≥35 years old. Participants had their skin examined by practitioners who had completed INFORMED, a validated web-based training for detection of skin cancers, particularly melanoma. Participants underwent the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Psychological Consequences of Screening (PCQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale, and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). Analyses were conducted in 2017. Of the entire study sample, 40% were thoroughly screened as determined by patient-reported level of undress and skin areas examined. Participants who were thoroughly screened: did not differ on negative psychosocial measures; scored higher on measures of positive psychosocial wellbeing (PCQ); and were more motivated to conduct monthly self-examinations and seek annual clinician skin examinations, compared to other participants (p < 0.05). Importantly, thoroughly screened patients were more likely to report skin prevention practices (skin self-examinations to identify a concerning lesion, practitioner provided skin exam), recommend skin examinations to peers, and feel satisfied with their skin cancer education than less thoroughly screened individuals (p < 0.01). Our results suggest that visual screening for skin cancer does not worsen patient psychosocial wellbeing and may be associated with improved skin cancer-related practices and attitudes.