Beta-blockade prevents recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding in well-compensated patients with alcoholic cirrhosis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Does elective sclerotherapy improve the efficacy of long-term propranolol for prevention of recurrent bleeding in patients with severe cirrhosis? A prospective multicenter, randomized trial

We conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial to compare the efficacy of sclerotherapy plus propranolol with that of propranolol alone in the prevention of recurrent gastroesophageal bleeding in severely cirrhotic patients. For 2 yr (1987 to 1988) 131 patients (96% of whom were alcoholic) with Child-Pugh class B or C cirrhosis (56% were class B and 44% were class C) were randomly assigned to one of our two treatment groups after cessation of variceal bleeding, without hemostatic sclerosis, and were observed for at least 2 yr. Treatment observance was good in 89% of cases; alcohol withdrawal was observed in 62% of cases. Sclerotherapy was performed weekly with 1% polidocanol, and variceal obliteration was obtained in 83% of cases, in a mean number of four sessions. The cumulative percentages (expressed as mean +/- S.D.) of recurrent bleeding at 2 yr were 42% +/- 6% for propranolol plus sclerotherapy and 59% +/- 6% for propranolol alone (a nonsignificant difference). Twenty-eight patients from the propranolol group but only 12 patients from the propranolol-plus-sclerotherapy group had recurrent bleeding from esophageal variceal rupture (p less than 0.01). The total number of blood units per patient with recurrent bleeding was slightly but not significantly more important in the propranolol group (8 +/- 7) than in the propranolol-plus-sclerotherapy group (5 +/- 5; p = 0.09).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Echo-Doppler evaluation of acute flow changes in portal hypertensive patients: flow velocity as a reliable parameter

In order to evaluate the behavior of the portal vein cross-sectional area during changes in portal flow, two groups of subjects were analyzed in two blinded cross-over studies using echo-Doppler flowmetry. The first group (I) consisted of 21 patients with cirrhosis and 16 controls. They received a standardized meal which is known to increase portal flow. The second group (II) consisted of 31 patients with cirrhosis who received a dose of propranolol which is known to decrease portal flow. In Group I, 30 min after the meal, the portal vein blood velocity increased by 35 +/- 6% (p less than 0.01) in cirrhotic patients and by 55 +/- 5% (p less than 0.01), in normal subjects. The portal vein cross-sectional area increased significantly in normal subjects (22 +/- 2%, p less than 0.01) but not in cirrhotic patients (4 +/- 2%, n.s.). In Group II, 2 h after propranolol, there was a significant decrease in portal blood velocity (-14 +/- 2%), whereas the portal vein cross-sectional area did not show any significant changes. These data demonstrate that, in portal hypersensitive patients, the portal area measured by echo-Doppler flowmetry can be assumed to be constant and hence its calculation to estimate changes in portal blood flow can be omitted. Therefore, the use of blood velocity alone is suggested to monitor acute changes in flow in portal hypertension using Doppler flowmetry. The elimination of the portal vein cross-sectional area measurement simplifies the quantitative calculation of portal hemodynamics and increases the reliability of the technique by avoiding a source of error.

Lymphocyte beta 2-adrenoceptors and plasma catecholamines in patients with cirrhosis

The hemodynamic response to propranolol in patients with cirrhosis is heterogeneous. In some patients, there is an expected decrease in portal pressure, whereas in others, portal pressure fails to decrease despite adequate beta-blockade. It has been suggested that this lack of response could be related to down-regulation of beta 2-adrenoceptors, promoted by the increased adrenergic activity frequently found in decompensated cirrhosis. The present study investigated this hypothesis by measuring the density and affinity of lymphocyte beta 2-adrenoceptors (L-beta 2-AR), an established index of beta 2-adrenoceptors in target organs, and the plasma levels of norepinephrine and epinephrine in a group of 32 patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. The portal pressure response to propranolol administration (0.1 mg/kg + 2 mg/h) was also investigated (n = 27). Patients with cirrhosis had increased norepinephrine levels (605 +/- 360 vs. 224 +/- 110 pg/mL in controls; P less than 0.001), but plasma epinephrine level was not increased (136 +/- 72 vs. 111 +/- 22 pg/mL in controls; NS). There were no differences between cirrhotic patients and controls in the density of L-beta 2-AR (1398 +/- 489 vs. 1278 +/- 356 receptors/cell; NS). Portal pressure decreased greater than 10% in 12 patients (responders) and less than 10% in the remaining 15 (nonresponders). Contrary to previous suggestions, there were no significant differences between responders and nonresponders in relation to the density of L-beta 2-AR (1362 +/- 527 vs. 1487 +/- 419 receptors/cell; NS), to the affinity of these receptors (0.15 +/- 0.27 vs. 0.13 +/- 0.12 nmol/L; NS), to the plasma levels of norepinephrine (661 +/- 508 vs. 621 +/- 256 pg/mL; NS), and to plasma epinephrine concentration (141 +/- 90 vs. 140 +/- 75 pg/mL; NS). These results show that the response of portal pressure to propranolol administration is neither related to the density and affinity of L-beta 2-AR nor to the plasma levels of norepinephrine and epinephrine. Thus, the determination of these parameters cannot substitute measurements of portal pressure to identify those patients with an adequate portal pressure response to propranolol treatment.

Postprandial changes in portal haemodynamics in patients with cirrhosis

Previous studies have shown that portal venous pressure increases in patients with cirrhosis after a protein meal. Since this increase may be mediated by an increase in hepatic blood flow or postsinusoidal hepatic vascular resistance, the present study was designed to examine the precise relation between the postprandial changes in these three variables in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Estimated hepatic blood flow (EHBF; indocyanine green clearance), portosystemic gradient (PSG; wedged free hepatic venous pressure), and postsinusoidal hepatic vascular resistance (PSR = PSG/EHBF) were measured simultaneously before and at 10 minute intervals after a high protein meal, containing 80 g protein, 40 g carbohydrate and 12 g fat (600 kcal) in nine patients (seven alcoholic, two non-alcoholic) with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. After the meal, the portosystemic gradient increased by 33% from mean (SEM) 15.6 (0.9) mm Hg to 20.7 (1.3) mm Hg, (p less than 0.01; Wilcoxon signed ranks test) within 30 minutes. Coincident with this increase in portosystemic gradient, estimated hepatic blood flow increased by 69.2% from 20.1 (1.7) ml/min/kg to 33.9 (2.5) ml/min/kg (p = 0.01), peak values occurring at 25 minutes, at which time the postsinusoidal hepatic vascular resistance had decreased by 31% from 1.10 (0.1) 10(-2) mm Hg/ml/min to 0.8 (0.5) 10(-2) mm Hg/ml/min (p = 0.01). These results suggest that the postprandial increase in portal venous pressure in patients with cirrhosis is mediated by an increase in hepatic blood flow and modified by a simultaneous decrease in postsinusoidal resistance.

Long term management of oesophageal varices

Effective control of variceal rebleeding (secondary prophylaxis) or prevention of the initial bleeding (primary prophylaxis) are the main objectives of the treatment of portal hypertension. Endoscopic sclerotherapy is the treatment of choice for secondary prophylaxis, since it significantly decreases rebleeding and, to some extent, mortality. A combination of propranolol and sclerotherapy may be of benefit by decreasing postsclerotherapy rebleeding. Endoscopic variceal band ligation and transjugular intrahepatic shunt are emerging as useful alternative techniques. Devascularisation and preferably selective shunts should be reserved for use as salvage of sclerotherapy failures. Liver transplantation, if feasible, could become the ultimate therapy by controlling variceal bleeding and improving hepatic function. Pharmacotherapy, while not very successful for secondary prophylaxis, has shown promise for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. Nonselective beta-blockers significantly decrease the rebleeding rates but are associated with only marginal survival benefits. beta-Blockers alone cannot decrease the hepatic venous pressure gradient adequately (to less than 12mm Hg). Combination with nitrates and other drugs may prove beneficial and requires clinical evaluation. Endoscopic sclerotherapy and surgery have little role in primary prevention of variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis but need evaluation in noncirrhotic patients.

[Therapy of bleeding esophageal varices in West Germany--results of a survey]

An inquiry concerning bleeding of esophageal varices included 1076 surgical and medical departments in the Federal Republic of Germany (West). Prevailing forms of treatment are acute sclerotherapy or esophageal balloon tamponade followed by long-term sclerotherapy. In case of medically uncontrollable bleeding oesophagogastric devascularization procedures are preferred to portacaval shunt. Beta-blockers are applied in medical departments for the prophylaxis of recurrence. Only after several rebleedings, despite of sclerotherapy, approx. half of the departments consider an elective shunt. The distal splenorenal shunt described by Warren and portacaval anastomosis clearly prevail over all other shunts.

Propranolol in prevention of recurrent bleeding from severe portal hypertensive gastropathy in cirrhosis

The two main causes of gastrointestinal bleeding in cirrhosis are oesophageal varices and portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG). Rebleeding from varices can be prevented by beta-blockers, but it is not clear whether these drugs effectively reduce rebleeding from PHG. 54 cirrhotic patients with acute or chronic bleeding from severe PHG took part in a randomised, controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of propranolol in prevention of rebleeding from PHG. 26 patients were randomised to receive propranolol daily at a dose that reduced the resting heart rate by 25% or to 55 bpm (20-160 mg twice daily), throughout mean follow-up of 21 (SD 11) months. 28 untreated controls were followed-up, with the same examinations, for 18 (13) months. The actuarial percentages of patients free of rebleeding from PHG were significantly higher in the propranolol-treated patients than in the untreated controls at 12 months (65% vs 38%; p less than 0.05) and at 30 months of follow-up (52% vs 7%; p less than 0.05). Propranolol-treated patients had fewer episodes of acute bleeding than controls (0.010 [0.004] vs 0.120 [0.040] per patient per month). Multivariate analysis showed that absence of propranolol treatment was the only predictive variable for rebleeding. Actuarial survival was slightly higher in the propranolol group than in the controls, but the difference was not significant. Thus, long-term propranolol treatment significantly reduces the frequency of rebleeding from severe PHG, and may improve the prognosis of cirrhotic patients with this disorder.

Double-blind investigation of the effects of propranolol and placebo on the pressure of esophageal varices in patients with portal hypertension

This study was aimed at investigating the effects of propranolol on esophageal variceal pressure in patients with portal hypertension. Variceal pressure was measured at endoscopy using a miniature pressure-sensitive gauge in 20 patients with portal hypertension. Measurements were obtained under baseline conditions and 20 min after double-blind administration of propranolol (0.15 mg/kg; n = 10) or an identical amount of placebo (normal saline, 0.3 ml/kg; n = 10). Under baseline conditions, variceal pressure was similar in propranolol and placebo groups (14.1 +/- 5 mm Hg vs. 14.9 +/- 6.6 mm Hg, respectively; not significant). Placebo had no significant effect on variceal pressure (baseline = 14.9 +/- 6.6 mm Hg; placebo = 15.5 +/- 6.6 mm Hg; not significant), and values after placebo administration were closely correlated with baseline values (r = 0.98; y = 1.1 + 0.97 x; p less than 0.0001). In contrast, propranolol caused a significant decrease in the pressure of esophageal varices (from 14.1 +/- 5 mm Hg to 11.3 +/- 4.4 mm Hg; p less than 0.0002). No significant changes in the size of esophageal varices were observed after propranolol or placebo administration. This study shows (a) the endoscopic pressure-gauge technique has a low variability and may be used to assess acute drug-induced changes in variceal pressure; and (b) propranolol causes significant decreases in variceal pressure in patients with portal hypertension and esophageal varices.

Bleeding esophagogastric varices. Ways to treat active episodes and prevent recurrence

Bleeding from esophagogastric varices carries a high mortality rate. Active variceal bleeding can usually be temporarily controlled medically with a combination of intravenous vasopressin and nitroglycerin, with balloon tamponade, or with endoscopic sclerotherapy. Because of the high likelihood of recurrence, long-term treatment, such as repeated sclerotherapy, propranolol therapy, or shunt surgery, is necessary. The proper selection of such measures requires consideration of the site of variceal bleeding, local availability of specialized techniques, and patient factors. Only liver transplantation reverses the liver damage and offers hope of improved long-term survival. As success at identifying high-risk patients by endoscopic features improves, propranolol or other pharmacologic prophylaxis may become an acceptable treatment.

Propranolol in the prevention of the first hemorrhage from esophagogastric varices: A multicenter, randomized clinical trial. The Boston-New Haven-Barcelona Portal Hypertension Study Group

To assess the effectiveness of propranolol in the prevention of initial variceal hemorrhage, a double-blind, randomized trial was carried out in three centers. Patients with cirrhosis (78% alcoholic), hepatic venous pressure gradients greater than 12 mm Hg and endoscopically proven esophageal varices were randomly assigned to propranolol (51 patients) or placebo (51 patients). Of the 102 patients, 58% were Child's class A, 34% were Child's class B and 8% were Child's class C. Daily dosage was determined by the administration of progressively increasing doses of propranolol with the hepatic vein catheter in place to achieve a 25% decrease in hepatic venous pressure gradient, a decrease in hepatic venous pressure gradient to less than 12 mm Hg or a decrease in resting heart rate to less than 55 beats/min. During a mean follow-up period of 16.3 mo, 11 patients in the placebo group (22%) bled from esophageal varices compared with 2 in the propranolol group (4%) during a mean period of 17.1 mo (p less than 0.01). Three additional patients (6%) in the placebo group bled from portal hypertensive gastropathy compared with none in the propranolol group. Propranolol appeared effective in preventing bleeding from large varices. Eleven deaths (22%) occurred in the placebo group compared with eight deaths (16%) in the propranolol group (NS). The mean dose of propranolol was 132 mg/day, and the median dose was 80 mg/day. Using a compliance index (pill count, clinic attendance, alcohol and propranolol levels and alcohol history), 81% of the propranolol patients and 77% of the placebo patients were considered compliant. Complications severe enough to require cessation of therapy occurred in eight patients (16%) in the propranolol group and four in the placebo group (8%) (NS). We conclude that propranolol effectively prevents the first variceal hemorrhage in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis and large esophageal varices but does not improve survival.

Effects of beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists on cerebral blood flow of cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension

The current study evaluated the effect of two beta adrenergic-blocking agents, propranolol (PRP) and atenolol (ATN), versus placebo on cerebral blood flow (CBF) of three homogeneous groups of cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension. CBF was measured by the noninvasive 133-Xenon inhalation method at rest and 1 hour after a single oral dose of PRP (40 mg), or ATN (100 mg), or placebo. Blood pressure and heart rate (HR) were measured at the beginning of each examination, and end-tidal pCO2(PeCO2) was monitored. The HR decreased significantly in both the PRP and ATN groups (P less than .01), whereas no changes were recorded for both PeCO2 and mean arterial blood pressure (MABP). The comparisons of the CBF differences among groups (ANOVA with the significance levels adjusted by the Bonferroni's correction) showed a significant increase in CBF after ATN as compared with both placebo (P less than .02) and PRP (P less than .01), whereas no significant differences were seen after PRP as compared with placebo. Our results confirm that PRP does not significantly affect CBF, whereas ATN induces an increase in CBF, although the underlying mechanism is difficult to explain.

Meta-analysis of value of propranolol in prevention of variceal haemorrhage

A meta-analysis of all controlled clinical trials of beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs, principally propranolol, in the prevention of primary or secondary variceal bleeding has shown that beta-blockade significantly reduced the occurrence of variceal bleeding, deaths from variceal bleeding, and overall mortality. There was some heterogeneity between trials in the effect of beta blockade on secondary prevention. When only fully reported, randomised, placebo-controlled studies were included the heterogeneity disappeared, and the reductions in bleeding episodes and mortality became more striking. Separate analyses of primary and secondary prevention studies also showed clear reductions in occurrence of variceal bleeding and deaths. These results seem to indicate the value of beta-adrenoreceptor blocking drugs for the primary prevention of haemorrhage from large oesophageal varices. However, there is still a need for large multicentre trials of beta-blockade for primary prevention of variceal bleeding in patients without large varices and of comparisons between beta-blocker therapy with other treatments in secondary prevention.

A hepatologist's view of variceal bleeding

Patients with cirrhosis and esophagogastric varices have a 25% to 33% risk of initial variceal bleeding, a risk of up to 70% for recurrent variceal bleeding, and an associated mortality of up to 50%. Based on a review of prospective randomized trials, control of acute variceal bleeding should involve vasopressin plus nitroglycerin as indicated for minor bleeding episodes, sclerotherapy for more severe bleeding episodes, and staple transection of the esophagus for patients who do not respond to these initial measures. Emergency portasystemic shunt surgery cannot be recommended at this time. For prevention of recurrent variceal hemorrhage, the data support the use of nonselective beta-adrenergic blockers (propranolol or nadolol) for patients with good liver function (Child's class A and B) and the use of chronic sclerotherapy to obliterate esophageal varices for patients with decompensated cirrhosis (Child's class C). Surgical procedures should be reserved for failures of medical management. The use of beta-adrenergic blockers offers the most promise for prevention of initial variceal bleeding.

Long-term pharmacologic therapy of portal hypertension

Beta-blockers modify splanchnic hemodynamics in cirrhotic patients. Nonselective beta-blockers are more effective than selective beta-blockers. Azygos blood flow, as a measure of collateral circulation, including that through varices, is always reduced, but the effects on portal pressure, whether measured directly or by the wedged hepatic venous pressure, are variable. The initial reported correlation between a 25% reduction of resting pulse rate and similar percentage reduction in the wedged free hepatic venous gradient has not been reproduced in subsequent studies. Therefore, to study the effect of changes in hemodynamic indices and the likelihood of variceal bleeding, direct measurements of such indices need to be made in clinical trials. At present, only one primary-prevention trial of propranolol suggests that a hemodynamic index can be used to identify patients given propranolol who will not bleed. Some clinical factors may be important in identifying nonresponders in trials of secondary prevention, but these are not universally recognized. The results of secondary-prevention studies are very heterogeneous, and it is difficult to understand why this is so. However, comparative studies versus sclerotherapy suggest that reductions in rebleeding and mortality are similar. Pharmacologic treatment, including beta-blockade, is ideal for primary prevention of variceal bleeding. The initial results from randomized studies are more homogeneous regarding the benefit of beta-blockers than in the secondary-prevention studies, although there is still doubt about the response in cirrhotics with ascites. No fatal complications due to propranolol administration have been reported in cirrhotic patients, and the complications are reversible. The future of pharmacologic therapy for portal hypertension lies in combination therapy. The addition of vasodilators to beta-blockers appears to potentiate their effect on portal pressure reduction. The results of clinical trials are awaited with great interest.

A controlled trial of oral propranolol compared with injection sclerotherapy for the long-term management of variceal bleeding

This trial was carried out to assess the value of propranolol for the prevention of recurrent variceal bleeding in patients with well-compensated cirrhosis. We also compared propranolol therapy to long-term injection sclerotherapy. One hundred and eight patients, in whom the original variceal hemorrhage stopped spontaneously (before diagnostic endoscopy) and without sclerotherapy or surgical intervention, were included. All were Pugh grade A or B; 55% had alcoholic cirrhosis. Patients were chosen randomly to receive oral propranolol (in a dosage to reduce resting pulse rate by 25%) or to undergo long-term injection sclerotherapy. In both groups, episodes of repeat bleeding that did not stop spontaneously were managed with sclerotherapy. Patients considered to have failed propranolol therapy were treated with long-term sclerotherapy. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 64 mo. In the propranolol group, 28 (54%) of the 52 patients had repeat bleeding from varices with a total of 57 episodes; 14 received long-term sclerotherapy. In the sclerotherapy group, 25 (45%) of the 56 patients had repeat bleeding, with a total of 40 episodes (p less than 0.20). On an intention-to-treat basis, the risk of bleeding expressed per patient-month of follow-up was similar for the two groups, at 0.05 and 0.037, respectively. Survival as assessed by cumulative life analysis was also similar, with 55% and 66% alive at 3 yr (p less than 0.40). Stepwise regression analysis of possible factors predicting further bleeding in patients taking propranolol selected only two variables--the pretreatment pulse rate and the extent of pulse-rate reduction in response to propranolol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Enhancement of portal pressure reduction by the association of isosorbide-5-mononitrate to propranolol administration in patients with cirrhosis

This study investigated whether oral doses of isosorbide-5-mononitrate, a preferential venous dilator that decreases portal pressure, could enhance the effects of propranolol on portal hypertension. Taking part in the study were 28 patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Twenty patients (group 1) had hemodynamic measurements in baseline conditions after beta-blockade by intravenous administration of propranolol and after receiving oral doses of isosorbide-5-mononitrate. The remaining eight patients (group 2) were given oral isosorbide-5-mononitrate while receiving chronic propranolol therapy. In group 1, propranolol significantly reduced portal pressure (estimated as the gradient between wedged and free hepatic venous pressures) from 21.5 +/- 3.9 to 18.6 +/- 4.2 mm Hg (-13.7%, p less than 0.001), azygos blood flow (-38%, p less than 0.001), hepatic blood flow (-12.8%, p less than 0.05), cardiac output (-24.5%, p less than 0.001) and heart rate (-18.4%, p less than 0.001) without significant changes in mean arterial pressure. Addition of oral isosorbide-5-mononitrate caused a further and marked fall in portal pressure (to 15.7 +/- 3.1 mm Hg, p less than 0.001), without additional changes in azygos blood flow but with significant additional reductions in hepatic blood flow (-15.5%, p less than 0.05), cardiac output (-11.5%, p less than 0.001) and mean arterial pressure (-22%, p less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)