The 104-week efficacy and safety of telbivudine-based optimization strategy in chronic hepatitis B patients: a randomized, controlled study

Baseline quantitative hepatitis B core antibody titre alone strongly predicts HBeAg seroconversion across chronic hepatitis B patients treated with peginterferon or nucleos(t)ide analogues

OBJECTIVE

The investigation regarding the clinical significance of quantitative hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) during chronic hepatitis B (CHB) treatment is limited. The aim of this study was to determine the performance of anti-HBc as a predictor for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion in HBeAg-positive CHB patients treated with peginterferon (Peg-IFN) or nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs), respectively.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study consisting of 231 and 560 patients enrolled in two phase IV, multicentre, randomised, controlled trials treated with Peg-IFN or NUC-based therapy for up to 2 years, respectively. Quantitative anti-HBc evaluation was conducted for all the available samples in the two trials by using a newly developed double-sandwich anti-HBc immunoassay.

RESULTS

At the end of trials, 99 (42.9%) and 137 (24.5%) patients achieved HBeAg seroconversion in the Peg-IFN and NUC cohorts, respectively. We defined 4.4 log10 IU/mL, with a maximum sum of sensitivity and specificity, as the optimal cut-off value of baseline anti-HBc level to predict HBeAg seroconversion for both Peg-IFN and NUC. Patients with baseline anti-HBc ≥4.4 log10 IU/mL and baseline HBV DNA <9 log10 copies/mL had 65.8% (50/76) and 37.1% (52/140) rates of HBeAg seroconversion in the Peg-IFN and NUC cohorts, respectively. In pooled analysis, other than treatment strategy, the baseline anti-HBc level was the best independent predictor for HBeAg seroconversion (OR 2.178; 95% CI 1.577 to 3.009; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline anti-HBc titre is a useful predictor of Peg-IFN and NUC therapy efficacy in HBeAg-positive CHB patients, which could be used for optimising the antiviral therapy of CHB.

Comparison of efficacy and renal safety of telbivudine and entecavir in treatment-naive elderly patients with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Data comparing the clinical outcomes of telbivudine (LdT) and entecavir (ETV) in elderly patients with chronic hepatitis B are limited.

GOALS

The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and renal safety of LdT and ETV in treatment-naive elderly (≥ 60 years) patients with chronic hepatitis B.

METHODS

A total of 33 patients treated with LdT were consecutively enrolled in the study. Each patient was matched on the basis of age, sex, and baseline hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels with three to four randomly selected controls treated with ETV.

RESULTS

Clinical characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Higher cumulative HBeAg-seroconversion rates were observed in the LdT group than in the ETV group after 2 years (50 vs. 20%) and 3 years (50 vs. 26.67%) of treatment (all P<0.0001). Virological response rate at week 24 was significantly lower in the LdT group than it was in the ETV group (54.55 vs. 70.87%, P<0.0001), but no significant difference was noted in long-term cumulative rates of undetectable HBV DNA levels between the two groups (P=0.562). Virological breakthrough occurred in six (18.18%) LdT patients, with no such cases reported in the ETV group (P<0.0001). Antiviral resistance was strongly associated with LdT use and the absence of undetectable HBV DNA at weeks 12 and 24 (P<0.0001). During the study, significant improvement was observed in the estimated glomerular filtration rate and model for end-stage liver disease score in LdT versus ETV group.

CONCLUSION

LdT has a lower clinical efficacy for viral suppression and a higher risk of antiviral resistance than does ETV. However, LdT resulted in higher HBeAg-seroconversion rates and better renoprotective effects than did ETV.

Asian-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatitis B: a 2015 update

Worldwide, some 240 million people have chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV), with the highest rates of infection in Africa and Asia. Our understanding of the natural history of HBV infection and the potential for therapy of the resultant disease is continuously improving. New data have become available since the previous APASL guidelines for management of HBV infection were published in 2012. The objective of this manuscript is to update the recommendations for the optimal management of chronic HBV infection. The 2015 guidelines were developed by a panel of Asian experts chosen by the APASL. The clinical practice guidelines are based on evidence from existing publications or, if evidence was unavailable, on the experts' personal experience and opinion after deliberations. Manuscripts and abstracts of important meetings published through January 2015 have been evaluated. This guideline covers the full spectrum of care of patients infected with hepatitis B, including new terminology, natural history, screening, vaccination, counseling, diagnosis, assessment of the stage of liver disease, the indications, timing, choice and duration of single or combination of antiviral drugs, screening for HCC, management in special situations like childhood, pregnancy, coinfections, renal impairment and pre- and post-liver transplant, and policy guidelines. However, areas of uncertainty still exist, and clinicians, patients, and public health authorities must therefore continue to make choices on the basis of the evolving evidence. The final clinical practice guidelines and recommendations are presented here, along with the relevant background information.

Composition and Interactions of Hepatitis B Virus Quasispecies Defined the Virological Response During Telbivudine Therapy

Reverse transcriptase (RT) mutations contribute to hepatitis B virus resistance during antiviral therapy with nucleos(t)ide analogs. However, the composition of the RT quasispecies and their interactions during antiviral treatment have not yet been thoroughly defined. In this report, 10 patients from each of 3 different virological response groups, i.e., complete virological response, partial virological response and virological breakthrough, were selected from a multicenter trial of Telbivudine treatment. Variations in the drug resistance-related critical RT regions in 107 serial serum samples from the 30 patients were examined by ultra-deep sequencing. A total of 496,577 sequence reads were obtained, with an average sequencing coverage of 4,641X per sample. The phylogenies of the quasispecies revealed the independent origins of two critical quasispecies, i.e., the rtA181T and rtM204I mutants. Data analyses and theoretical modeling showed a cooperative-competitive interplay among the quasispecies. In particular, rtM204I mutants compete against other quasispecies, which eventually leads to virological breakthrough. However, in the absence of rtM204I mutants, synergistic growth of the drug-resistant rtA181T mutants with the wild-type quasispecies could drive the composition of the viral population into a state of partial virological response. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the frequency of drug-resistant mutations in the early phase of treatment is important for predicting the virological response to antiviral therapy.

Evaluation of the dynamic pattern of viral evolution in patients with virological breakthrough during treatment with nucleoside/nucleotide analogs by ultra‑deep pyrosequencing

Virological breakthrough is a clinical manifestation in patients infected with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), who undergo treatment with nucleoside/nucleotide analogs (NUCs). The current understanding of the underlying mechanism of virological breakthrough is limited. Ultra‑deep pyrosequencing (UDPS) is a novel and powerful tool used to investigate minor viral variants and viral evolution. The present study used UDPS to investigate the viral evolution pattern during virological breakthrough in patients with CHB treated with NUCs. A total of 12 patients who experienced virological breakthrough were recruited in the present study. During the treatment with lamivudine, adefovir was added as a rescue therapy when virological breakthrough emerged, and the therapy was continued until week 96. Serum samples from each patient were collected at different time points for UDPS analysis. Treatment with lamivudine resulted in an increased rate of the viral mutations, rtM204V/I, rtL180M and rtL80I. Virological breakthrough was accompanied by significant rtM204I/V substitutions in eight of the patients. A total of three types of rt204 mutation, associated with virological breakthrough, were observed, including YIDD variant‑dominated, YVDD variant‑dominated and YMDD wild‑type‑dominated virological breakthrough. YVDD variants reverted to the wild‑type following the adefovir add‑on rescue therapy, although the YIDD variants remained dominant following the combination therapy. The mechanism underlying virological breakthrough was revealed to be complex and associated with the rapid replication of mutated variants. UDPS analysis, therefore, provided a useful tool to investigate the dynamic evolution pattern of hepatitis B virus.

Efficacy and resistance to telbivudine treatment in chronic hepatitis B patients with favorable predictors: a multicenter study in Taiwan

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

A subgroup analysis of a GLOBE study identified subgroups of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with excellent outcomes to telbivudine (LdT) treatment. The aim of this study was to validate this concept using a real-world clinical population.

METHODS

This prospective, retrospective, and multicenter study examined both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative CHB patients treated with LdT for 2 years.

RESULTS

A total of 116 CHB patients were recruited. Of the 64 HBeAg-positive patients, 35 had favorable baseline characteristics [hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA ≤ 9 log(10) copies/mL and alanine aminotransferase ≥ 2× the upper limit of normal (ULN)], but only 40% (14/35) achieved polymerase chain reaction (PCR) negativity at week 24. Among the 14 patients with favorable baseline characteristics and on-treatment response, the rates of virologic, biochemical, and serologic response and genotypic resistance were 78.6% (11/14), 64.3% (9/14), 50% (7/14), and 7.1% (1/14), respectively, at week 104 of therapy. Of the 52 HBeAg-negative patients, 34 met the criteria of a baseline serum HBV-DNA level less than 7 log(10) copies/mL, and 29 (85.3%) achieved PCR negativity at week 24. Among the 29 patients with favorable baseline characteristics and on-treatment response, the rates of virologic and biochemical response and genotypic resistance were 96.6% (28/29), 72.4% (21/29), and 6.9% (2/29), respectively. In addition, the PCR negativity at week 24 was the only factor associated with the virologic response and genotypic resistance to LdT treatment.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy and resistance to LdT treatment in CHB patients with favorable predictors were comparable between a real-world clinical population and the GLOBE study. In addition, PCR negativity at week 24 could predict virologic response and genotypic resistance to LdT treatment.

Antiviral therapies and prospects for a cure of chronic hepatitis B

Current therapies of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remain limited to either pegylated interferon-α (Peg-IFN-α), or one of the five approved nucleoside analog (NA) treatments. Although viral suppression can be achieved in the majority of patients with high-barrier-to-resistance new-generation NAs (i.e., entecavir and tenofovir), HBsAg loss is achieved in only 10% of patients with both classes of drugs after a follow-up of 5 years. Attempts to improve the response by administering two different NAs or a combination of NA and Peg-IFN-α have been unsuccessful. Therefore, there is a renewed interest to investigate a number of steps in the hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication cycle and specific virus-host cell interactions as potential targets for new antivirals. Novel targets and compounds could readily be evaluated using both relevant in vitro and newly developed in vivo models of HBV infection. The addition of one or several new drugs to current regimens should offer the prospect of markedly improving the response to therapy, thus reducing the burden of drug resistance, as well as the incidence of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Randomized, three-arm study to optimize lamivudine efficacy in hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Data about the efficacy of de novo combination therapies, or optimization strategy by adding the other drug based on the virological response at week 24 of low genetic barrier antiviral agents is still limited. This study aimed to compare the efficacy at week 104 of lamivudine monotherapy (MONO), lamivudine plus adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) combination therapy (COMBO), and lamivudine optimization strategy (OPTIMIZE).

METHODS

Adult patients without antiviral therapy within 6 months before screening with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-DNA ≥ 10(5) copies/mL, alanine aminotransferase 1.3-10 times upper limit of normal and compensated hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) were randomized into three groups with 1:1:1 ratio. Patients in OPTIMIZE group started with lamivudine 100 mg q.d., and ADV 10 mg q.d. was added to suboptimal responders (HBV-DNA > 1000 copies/mL at week 24) from week 30 to week 104, whereas patients with early virological response (HBV-DNA ≤ 1000 copies/mL at week 24) continued MONO until week 104. For all the patients receiving MONO, ADV would be added if virological breakthrough was confirmed.

RESULTS

At week 104, more patients in COMBO and OPTIMIZE groups achieved HBV-DNA < 300 copies/mL (53.3% [64/120] and 48.3% [58/120]), with less lamivudine resistance (0.8% and 6.7%) compared with MONO group (HBV-DNA < 300 copies/mL 34.8% [41/118], lamivudine resistance 58.5%). Patients under MONO with early virological response showed superior efficacy at week 104 (HBV-DNA < 300 copies/mL 73.1% [38/52], HBeAg seroconversion 40.4% [21/52]). All regimens were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy of lamivudine plus ADV exhibited effective viral suppression and relatively low resistance in HBeAg-positive CHB patients. In lamivudine-treated patients with suboptimal virological response at week 24, promptly adding on ADV is necessary to prevent resistance development.

Impact of nucleos(t)ide analogue combination therapy on the estimated glomerular filtration rate in patients with chronic hepatitis B

Monotherapy with telbivudine or adefovir can affect estimated the glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). However, only a few studies have assessed changes in eGFR in patients who have chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and are receiving nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) combination therapy. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of long-term NA combination therapy on eGFR in Chinese CHB patients. This retrospective study included 195 CHB patients. Patient subgroups included those treated with lamivudine plus adefovir (n = 73), telbivudine plus adefovir (n = 51), and entecavir plus adefovir (n = 35); untreated patients (n = 36) served as a control group. After an average follow-up duration of 24 months with combination therapy, analysis of changes in eGFR from baseline values, calculated by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formulas, showed decrease by 11.08 and 18.34 mL/min (P < .001), respectively, in the lamivudine plus adefovir group; decrease by 3.73 and 10.04 mL/min (P = .012), respectively, in the entecavir plus adefovir group; and increase by 0.91 and 2.12 mL/min (P = .46), respectively, in the telbivudine plus adefovir group. The eGFR in the telbivudine plus adefovir group was similar to that for the untreated group. The eGFR decreases due to adefovir therapy could be rescued by adding telbivudine, and the eGFR increase due to telbivudine could be compromised by adding adefovir. Adefovir in combination with lamivudine or entecavir therapy was significantly associated with decreased eGFR, but telbivudine could rescue the eGFR decrease that results from adefovir treatment.

Antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B in China

The vaccination program against hepatitis B virus (HBV) has greatly reduced the incidence of HBV infection. However, almost one-fourth of the HBV infected patients worldwide are still located in China. The healthcare burden from chronic HBV infection is a big challenge for the Chinese government and clinicians. Antiviral therapy plays a central role in controlling chronic HBV infection and preventing the disease progression. However, due to the specific economic and medical system issues, the first-line antiviral agents recommended by the AASLD and EASL have not been widely used for Chinese patients. In this review, we will discuss some key issues in the area of antiviral treatment for chronic hepatitis B in China.

Antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis B

Since the licensing of lamivudine in 1999, the treatment of chronic hepatitis B has been revolutionized by the introduction of oral nucleoside and nucleotide analogues (NAs), which act as inhibitors of the HBV polymerase. The effectiveness of the first of these substances was limited by incomplete response and resistance development in many patients, but today, highly potent substances are available that make a reliable and durable suppression of HBV replication, a reduction of necroinflammatory activity in the liver, and even a reversion of liver fibrosis achievable for almost all patients. Beyond that, NA treatment can prevent the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in many patients. HBeAg seroconversion appears in approximately 50% of all HBeAg-positive patients during NA treatment. However, the ideal treatment endpoint, the serologic loss of HBsAg, remains a rare event almost exclusively achievable for HBeAg-positive patients. After cessation of the treatment, HBV replication tends to relapse in most patients, which is why the duration of NA treatment is indefinite. Future treatment strategies should aim at tailoring individual NA treatment regimens to increase HBs loss rates and optimize treatment duration.

Liquid oral suspension adefovir dipivoxil (GS-02-526): an update on treatments for hepatitis B infection

Though the global epidemiology of hepatitis B virus infection has declined due to effective immunization, chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remains a serious public health problem and there is still a need for more treatment options that are efficient, safe and simple for different kinds of CHB patients. Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) liquid suspension (GS-02-526), as a new form of oral ADV, not only has competent antiviral efficacy, but is also more convenient for patients with swallowing difficulties or patients with impaired renal function requiring dosage adjustment. The clinical data evaluating the safety, tolerability and antiviral activity of liquid suspension of ADV as well as its tablet are summarized in this article. The availability of liquid oral suspension of ADV would allow more patients to receive timely and reasonable antiviral treatments.

Chronic hepatitis B virus infection: epidemiology, prevention, and treatment in China

Chronic hepatitis B is a major health problem in China. The universal vaccination program since 1992 has changed the epidemiology of hepatitis B virus infection in China from highly to moderately endemic. The most prevalent hepatitis B virus strains in China are genotypes B and C, whereas those in western provinces are genotypes D and C/D hybrid. Chronic hepatitis B poses a heavy burden to the society in China. Different treatment strategies have been explored to improve patient outcomes in a cost-effective manner. However, antiviral drugs with a low genetic barrier to resistance are still extensively used because of the generally low income and limited resources in China. Individualized antiviral therapy is closely associated with translational medicine, which utilizes information from studies on genomics, immune biomarkers, and fibrosis. The results of these studies are crucial in further improving treatment outcomes.