Sustained inhibition of tumor growth and prolonged survival following sequential administration of doxorubicin and zoledronic acid in a breast cancer model

Bisphosphonates and pathologic complete response to taxane- and anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Several studies have suggested that bisphosphonates have an antitumor effect. In the current study, the authors sought to evaluate whether the use of bisphosphonates increased the rate of pathological complete response (pCR) in patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

The authors identified 1449 patients with breast cancer who were receiving taxane- and anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 1995 and 2007 at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Patients who received bisphosphonates for osteopenia or osteoporosis while receiving chemotherapy were also identified. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients achieving a pCR. Groups were compared using the chi-square test. A multivariable logistic regression model was fit to examine the relation between the use of bisphosphonates and pCR. An exploratory survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method was performed; groups were compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Of the 1449 patients included, 39 (2.7%) received bisphosphonates. Those receiving bisphosphonates were older (P < .001) and less likely to be obese (P = .04). The pCR rate was 25.4% in the bisphosphonate group and 16% in the nonbisphosphonate group (P = .11). In the multivariable model, patients treated with bisphosphonates tended to have higher rates of pCR (odds ratio, 2.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-5.24); however, the difference was not found to be statistically significant. With a median follow-up of 55 months (range, 3 months-145 months), no differences in disease recurrence or survival were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of bisphosphonates at the time of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not found to be associated with a statistically significant increase in the rates of pCR. The observed estimates suggest a positive effect; however, the small percentage of patients receiving bisphosphonates likely affected the power to detect a statistically significant difference.

Zoledronic acid use in cancer patients: more than just supportive care?

Bone is the most common site for metastasis from solid tumors, and the majority of patients will develop bone metastases during the natural course of their disease. Bisphosphonates are an effective treatment for preventing skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases and may preserve functional independence and quality of life. Although several bisphosphonates have been investigated in patients with solid tumors, only zoledronic acid (ZOL) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for preventing skeletal-related events in patients across a broad range of solid tumors. In addition, bisphosphonates, notably ZOL, prevent cancer treatment-induced bone loss in breast and prostate cancer patients who are receiving endocrine therapy. It also has been demonstrated that ZOL directly and indirectly inhibits cancer cell growth in vitro and growth and tumorigenesis in animal model systems. These properties may produce clinically meaningful benefits. In recent clinical studies in patients with cancer, ZOL improved overall and prolonged disease-free survival. Ongoing clinical trials in patients with solid tumors will provide further insight into the potential of ZOL to prevent distant metastases and improve survival.

Bisphosphonates' antitumor activity: an unravelled side of a multifaceted drug class

Bisphosphonates, especially nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (N-BPs), are widely used to preserve and improve bone health in patients with cancer because they inhibit osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. In addition to their effects on bone, preclinical evidence strongly suggests that N-BPs exert anticancer activity without the involvement of osteoclasts by interacting with macrophages, endothelial cells and tumor cells, and by stimulating the cytotoxicity of γδ T cells, a subset of human T cells. This review examines the current insights and fronts of ongoing preclinical research on N-BPs' antitumor activity.

Anti-tumour activity of bisphosphonates in preclinical models of breast cancer

There is increasing evidence of anti-tumour effects of bisphosphonates from pre-clinical studies, supporting a role for these drugs beyond their traditional use in treatment of cancer-induced bone disease. A range of model systems have been used to investigate the effects of different bisphosphonates on tumour growth, both in bone and at peripheral sites. Most of these studies conclude that bisphosphonates cause a reduction in tumour burden, but that early intervention and the use of high and/or repeated dosing is required. Successful eradication of cancer may only be achievable by targeting the tumour cells directly whilst also modifying the tumour microenvironment. In line with this, bisphosphonates are demonstrated to be particularly effective at reducing breast tumour growth when used in combination with agents that directly target cancer cells. Recent studies have shown that the effects of bisphosphonates on breast tumours are not limited to bone, and that prolonged anti-tumour effects may be achieved following their inclusion in combination therapy. This has opened the field to a new strand of bisphosphonate research, focussed on elucidating their effects on cells and components of the local, regional and distal tumour microenvironment. This review highlights the recent developments in relation to proposed anti-tumour effects of bisphosphonates reported from in vitro and in vivo models, and summarises the data from key breast cancer studies. Evidence for effects on different processes and cell types involved in cancer development and progression is discussed, and the main outstanding issues identified.

Anticancer properties of zoledronic acid

Zoledronic acid effectively reduces/delays skeletal-related events in patients with metastatic disease or skeletal-related cancers. Emerging data suggest that zoledronic acid may also exhibit anticancer properties. Zoledronic acid ± anticancer therapies in animal models inhibits soft-tissue tumor growth, decreases tumor cell proliferation, increases apoptosis, inhibits angiogenesis, alters tumor-associated macrophage function, and enhances immune surveillance. Data from in vitro and pilot studies suggest that zoledronic acid inhibits tumor cell dissemination in bone marrow, and early clinical data show that it may improve disease-related outcomes. Ongoing studies will further elucidate the role of zoledronic acid in cancer patients.

Zoledronic acid impairs myeloid differentiation to tumour-associated macrophages in mesothelioma

Background:

Suppressive immune cells present in tumour microenvironments are known to augment tumour growth and hamper efficacy of antitumour therapies. The amino-bisphosphonate Zoledronic acid (ZA) is considered as an antitumour agent, as recent studies showed that ZA prolongs disease-free survival in cancer patients. The exact mechanism is a topic of debate; it has been suggested that ZA targets tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs).

Methods:

We investigate the role of ZA on the myeloid differentiation to TAMs in murine mesothelioma in vivo and in vitro. Mice were intraperitoneally inoculated with a lethal dose of mesothelioma tumour cells and treated with ZA to determine the effects on myeloid differentiation and survival.

Results:

We show that ZA impaired myeloid differentiation. Inhibition of myeloid differentiation led to a reduction in TAMs, but the number of immature myeloid cells with myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) characteristics was increased. In addition, ZA affects the phenotype of macrophages leading to reduced level of TAM-associated cytokines in the tumour microenvironment. No improvement of survival was observed.

Conclusion:

We conclude that ZA leads to a reduction in macrophages and impairs polarisation towards an M2 phenotype, but this was associated with an increase in the number of immature myeloid cells, which might diminish the effects of ZA on survival.

[Antitumor properties of the bisphosphonate zoledronate and potential therapeutic implications in the clinic]

Zoledronate, just as other bisphosphonates, inhibit osteoclast mediated bone resorption. This is the reason why they are used in the treatment of bone metastasis, in order to block osteolysis. Zoledronate and some other bisphosphonates (clodronate, pamidronate, ibandronate, alendronate, risédronate, minodronate) also exhibit antitumor properties in vitro. They act directly on tumor cells by blocking tumor cell adhesion, invasion and proliferation, and by inducing tumor cell apoptosis. However, their high bone mineral affinity decreases their bioavailability to a significant extent and, thus, should weaken their in vivo antitumor potential. Despite of this, several studies (most of them being performed with zoledronate) show that bisphosphonates have an in vivo antitumor activity. This review focuses on zoledronate and on results obtained in several experimental models showing that this bisphosphonate interferes with the growth of tumors and metastases which are thriving in tissues others than the skeletal tissue. The significance of these findings is discussed in the light of several ongoing clinical trials which examine the benefits of using zoledronate and other bisphosphonates in the adjuvant treatment of cancers at an early stage of the disease.

Bisphosphonates and RANK ligand inhibitors for the treatment and prevention of metastatic bone disease

Bisphosphonates (BPs) are potent inhibitors of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, which is increased when cancer cells invade bone. BPs are an established treatment for cancer that has spread to bone, and effectively reduce pain and other skeletal-related events. New directions in metastatic bone disease (MBD) include personalised BP therapy, such as using bone markers to guide frequency of BP administration and bone targeting agents such as denosumab (AMG 162). Clinical trials strongly suggest that denosumab might play a defined role in the future management of MBD. In terms of potential anti-cancer activity, early data tentatively suggest that zoledronic acid might have a role to play in the prevention of metastatic disease, though whether this is a direct effect on cancer cells, or indirect via the bone marrow micro-environment, or both, is as yet undiscovered. The definitive answer as to the role of adjuvant BP in early cancer is being addressed, with over 20,000 patients with breast, prostate or lung cancer currently participating in adjuvant BP randomised trials. The results of these trials should be available in the next few years, and this will establish whether BPs given early in the course of cancer will be able to prevent the formation of metastases, bone or otherwise.

The effects of adding zoledronic acid to neoadjuvant chemotherapy on tumour response: exploratory evidence for direct anti-tumour activity in breast cancer

Background:

Pre-clinical studies have demonstrated synergistic anti-tumour effects of chemotherapy (CT) and zoledronic acid (ZOL). Within the AZURE trial, designed to determine whether the addition of ZOL to neoadjuvant therapy improves disease outcomes, a subgroup received neoadjuvant CT. We report a retrospective evaluation comparing pathological response in the primary tumour between treatment groups.

Methods:

In total, 205 patients received neoadjuvant CT±ZOL (CT+ZOL, n=102; CT, n=103). The primary end point was pathologically assessed residual invasive tumour size (RITS) at surgery. Secondary end points were pathological complete response (pCR) rate and axillary nodal involvement. Following review of surgical pathology reports (n=195), outcome differences between groups were assessed adjusting for potential response modifiers.

Results:

Baseline characteristics and CT treatments were similar. In multivariate analysis, allowing for biological and clinical factors known to influence tumour response, the adjusted mean RITS in CT and CT+ZOL groups were 27.4 and 15.5 mm, respectively, giving a difference in means of 12 mm (95% confidence interval: 3.5–20.4 mm; P=0.006). The pCR rate was 6.9% in the CT group and 11.7% in the CT+ZOL group (P=0.146). There was no difference in axillary nodal involvement (P=0.6315).

Conclusion:

These data suggest a possible direct anti-tumour effect of ZOL in combination with CT, warranting formal evaluation in prospective studies.