Complications of donor apheresis

Anticoagulation techniques in apheresis: from heparin to citrate and beyond

Anticoagulation is essential for maintaining the fluidity of extravascular blood on the apheresis circuit. Although both citrate and heparin are used as an anticoagulant during apheresis, citrate is preferred for the majority of exchange procedures because of its safety and effectiveness. Complications of citrate are primarily due to physiologic effects of hypocalcemia. Symptoms of hypocalcemia and other citrate-induced metabolic abnormalities affect neuromuscular and cardiac function and range in severity from mild dysesthesias (most common) to tetany, seizures, and cardiac arrhythmias. Oral or intravenous calcium supplementation is advised for decreased ionized calcium levels and/or symptomatic management of hypocalcemia. Heparin-based anticoagulation is limited to certain apheresis procedures (membrane-based plasma exchange, LDL apheresis, or photopheresis) or is used in combination with citrate to reduce citrate load. While effective, heparin anticoagulation is associated with an increased frequency of bleeding complications and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. J. Clin. Apheresis 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Adverse events and safety issues in blood donation--a comprehensive review

Although blood donation is generally safe, a variety of risks and complications exist, the most common being iron deficiency, vasovagal reactions and citrate-related events. In the last decades, extensive efforts have significantly improved recipient and product safety, but there is still great potential to optimise donor care. Many therapies in modern medicine depend on the prompt availability of blood products, therefore it is crucial to maintain a motivated and healthy donor pool in view of a limited number of healthy volunteers willing and able to give blood or blood components. We present a comprehensive review on adverse events addressing all types of blood donation including whole blood, plasma, platelet, peripheral blood stem cell, leucocyte and bone marrow donation. In addition, we outline strategies for the prevention and treatment of these events and give a blueprint for future research in this field.

Demographics of apheresis platelet donors in five blood centers in China

BACKGROUND

Blood component donations by apheresis has become more common in modern blood transfusion practices. However, apheresis donation still remains less common in China. This study describes the demographic profile and transfusion-transmissible infection (TTI) prevalence among donors making apheresis platelet (AP) donations compared to those making whole blood (WB) donations and the differences among five geographically diverse blood centers in China.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This is a descriptive study using data from all successful donations at the five blood centers in 2008 and 2009. Donor demographic and TTI screening reactive rates were collected for WB and AP donations and blood centers. Logistic regression was used to identify independent factors associated with AP donations.

RESULTS

From January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2009, there were 512,594 WB and 26,199 AP donations at five blood centers. AP donations accounted for 4.9% of all donations. AP donations have lower reactive rate than WB donations for hepatitis B virus surface antigen, hepatitis C virus antibodies, human immunodeficiency virus antibodies, and syphilis screening testing. Males, donors older than 25 years old, non-Han donors, and donors with below high school educational level were more likely to make AP donations. The characteristics of AP donations differed among the five Chinese blood centers.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis suggests that the characteristics of AP donations in China are different from WB donations and differ among the five Chinese blood centers. Some of the differences are likely due to different recruitment policies. Further studies should be conducted to understand what motivates Chinese blood donors to participate as AP donors.

Calcium supplementation attenuates citrate-related changes in bone metabolism: a placebo-controlled crossover study in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

Citrate is the anticoagulation of choice in apheresis procedures. Citrate anticoagulation results in a short-term increase in serological markers of bone turnover, with uncertain clinical significance.

AIM

To understand the effect of calcium supplementation on serological bone turnover markers during an acute citrate load as a mimic of citrate anticoagulation during apheresis procedures.

METHODS

A placebo-controlled, crossover study was conducted in 22 healthy volunteers. Volunteers received a standardized citrate load at a fixed dose of 1.5 mg/kg of body weight/min for 80 min for three times and a single placebo infusion as a control. Each intervention was separated by a wash-out interval of 2 to 3 weeks. During two citrate infusions, volunteers received an additional calcium supplementation, consisting of either oral administration of calcium carbonate or an i.v. bypass infusion of calcium gluconate. Serial blood samples were collected for the determination of ionized calcium (iCa), intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) and markers of bone remodeling, C-telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTX) and osteocalcin (OC).

RESULTS

The infusion of citrate without calcium supplementation resulted in an increase in the bone formation marker OC and the bone resorption marker CTX, in addition to the changes in iPTH and iCa. The administration of calcium by either oral administration or as an i.v. bypass infusion attenuated the observed changes in CTX, but showed no effects on the elevation of the bone formation marker OC. There was no difference in the attenuation of CTX between the two calcium formulations. However, the i.v. application of calcium gluconate had a superior effect in reducing the change of serum iPTH and iCa as compared to the oral administration of calcium carbonate.

CONCLUSIONS

Calcium supplementation is an effective method in damping the citrate-related transient increase of the serological bone resorption marker CTX. As a mimic for the citrate-based apheresis procedure, our data may enforce the prophylactic application of calcium supplementation to attenuate the short-term elevation of bone resorption related to an acute citrate load.

Transformation of human mesenchymal cells and skin fibroblasts into hematopoietic cells

Patients with prolonged myelosuppression require frequent platelet and occasional granulocyte transfusions. Multi-donor transfusions induce alloimmunization, thereby increasing morbidity and mortality. Therefore, an autologous or HLA-matched allogeneic source of platelets and granulocytes is needed. To determine whether nonhematopoietic cells can be reprogrammed into hematopoietic cells, human mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and skin fibroblasts were incubated with the demethylating agent 5-azacytidine (Aza) and the growth factors (GF) granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and stem cell factor. This treatment transformed MSCs to round, non-adherent cells expressing T-, B-, myeloid-, or stem/progenitor-cell markers. The transformed cells engrafted as hematopoietic cells in bone marrow of immunodeficient mice. DNA methylation and mRNA array analysis suggested that Aza and GF treatment demethylated and activated HOXB genes. Indeed, transfection of MSCs or skin fibroblasts with HOXB4, HOXB5, and HOXB2 genes transformed them into hematopoietic cells. Further studies are needed to determine whether transformed MSCs or skin fibroblasts are suitable for therapy.

[Serious adverse effects of blood collection]

The notification of serious adverse events occurring resulting from the collection of blood or blood components is a statutory requirement. The value of this set of surveillance procedures is the use of data collected. This article focuses on the organization of the French notification system, and the management of the main side effects known and reported.

Increased risk of citrate reactions in patients with multiple myeloma during peripheral blood stem cell leukapheresis

The citrate based anticoagulant ACD is commonly used in apheresis procedures. Due to its ability to decrease ionized calcium, citrate may cause unpleasant symptoms, such as paresthesias and muscle cramps, in patients undergoing therapeutic and donor apheresis. We noticed that patients with multiple myeloma (MM) undergoing autologous stem cell leukapheresis appeared to have more citrate reactions when compared to other patients undergoing the same procedure. A retrospective chart review was performed to evaluate 139 (of 151) consecutive patients with MM, amyloidosis, hematological and solid malignancies who had autologous peripheral blood stem cell collection between January 2007 and February 2008. Citrate reactions, ranging from mild (e.g., perioral tingling and parasthesias) to severe (e.g., nausea/vomiting and muscle cramps) were noted for 35 patients. Twenty-three of 63 patients with MM had documented citrate reactions, which was significantly higher than those with other hematological and solid malignancies (37% vs. 20%; P < 0.05, Relative Risk (RR) = 1.9). The severities of citrate reactions were the same in both groups; approximately 50% of patients in each group received i.v. calcium gluconate for treatment of hypocalcemia. No correlation between bisphosphonate therapy and citrate reactions were noted in our study group. Examination of available laboratory values related to calcium homeostasis, liver, and renal function failed to reveal a mechanism for the increase in citrate reactions observed. In summary, this single institution retrospective study indicates that patients with MM are more sensitive to citrate-induced hypocalcemia during leukapheresis when compared to patients with other hematological and solid malignancies. Strategies for decreasing citrate reactions (e.g., supplemental calcium and slowing return rates) should be considered for patient safety and comfort, especially in the MM population, on a prophylactic rather than reactive basis.

Apheresis affects bone and mineral metabolism

BACKGROUND

Apheresis is a procedure to selectively obtain blood components. For the collection process citrate is routinely used. It inhibits coagulation by binding to ionized calcium and leads to metabolic alkalosis.

OBJECTIVE

Whether regular apheresis affects bone and mineral metabolism is unknown. The intention of this study was to investigate 1) the acute effects of apheresis on acid-base balance, bone and mineral metabolism and 2) to compare bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and hip of donors to matched control subjects.

DESIGN

In this open, observational, single-center, cross-sectional study we enrolled 102 regular plasma and thrombocyte donors to pursue objective 1) and compared those to 102 matched controls (CTR) for objective 2).

RESULTS

Platelet donation led to significant decreases in serum ionized calcium (-17%) and phosphate (-18%), to marked increases in base excess (57%) and PTH levels (192%) during apheresis. Baseline biochemical comparisons between donors and CTR revealed significantly lower values for donors for serum calcium, albumin, and 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels. Mean Z-score at the lumbar spine adjusted for BMI, average physical activity and daily calcium intake was lower for donors (-0.28+/-0.11) when compared to CTR subjects (0.06+/-0.11, P<0.05). Total and neck femoral BMD was also lower in the donor group, however, this difference was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Exposure to citrate during the apheresis procedure acutely affects mineral and bone metabolism. Regular donations of blood components compromised BMD at the lumbar spine. If confirmed, strategies to prevent long-term effects on bone need to be formulated.

Postthaw clotting of peripheral blood stem cell products due to insufficient anticoagulant

The amount of acid citrate dextrose formula A (ACD-A), which is a commonly used anticoagulant in leukopheresis, has to ensure both the safety of the donor and guarantee the integrity of the peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) product until its transplant. Two recent consecutive cases of postthaw PBSC product clotting initiated a look-back investigation of the ACD-A percentage in leukopheresis products collected in our facility. The data indicated a significant difference between the average amount of ACD-A in prefreezing products collected during 2006 (11.4%) and in products collected during 2007 and 2008 (8.8% and 8.7%, respectively). These findings and the fact that the two clotted products had less than 7% ACD-A indicated that insufficient amount of anticoagulant might contribute to their clotting. This investigation prompted us to modify our collection and thawing procedures to prevent similar events in the future.

Adverse reactions in blood and apheresis donors: experience from two Italian transfusion centres

BACKGROUND

Blood and apheresis donations are widely considered to be safe with a low incidence of adverse reactions and injuries; however, data reported in the medical literature on the prevalence of adverse events in donors and studies on the predictive risk factors for donor reactions are limited and contradictory.

METHODS

From January 2002 to December 2006 we recorded every adverse reaction verified during 240,596 consecutive blood and apheresis donations (183,855 homologous whole blood donations, 6,669 autologous whole blood donations, 38,647 plasmapheresis, 2,641 plateletpheresis and 8,784 multicomponent donations) at the Italian Transfusion Centres of Verona and Ragusa,.

RESULTS

Using a special, pre-arranged form within the quality system, a total of 686 adverse reactions (related to 0.28% of all donations) were recorded. Vasovagal reactions, mostly of mild intensity, were the most commonly observed adverse reactions, with a frequency of 0.20% (487/ 240,596). The frequency of the vasovagal reactions varied according to the different types of donation, being 0.19% (346/183,855) for homologous whole blood donations, 0.24% (16/6,669) for autologous whole blood donations, 0.16% (63/38,647) for plasmapheresis, 0.68% (18/2,641) for plateletpheresis and 0.49 (43/8,784) for multicomponent donations. Citrate toxicity was reported in 0.38% (189/50,072) of apheresis donations. Severe adverse reactions were very rare, as they occurred in 0.004% of the donations (10/240,596).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the results of our 5-year survey document that apheresis and blood donation are safe procedures for the donor with a low incidence of adverse reactions; the adverse reactions that did occur were mostly mild and resolved rapidly.

Use of random versus apheresis platelet concentrates

The respective use of random (RPC) and apheresis (APC) platelet concentrates is highly heterogeneous among countries, ranging from 10 to 98% RPC in countries supposed to provide a similar transfusion service to patients. Moreover, when considering each country in the past 10 years, one can observe that some have changed their policy, switching from a majority of APC to RPC or vice versa. This presentation intends to analyse which factors may impact such decisions. For many years, the only available platelet component was a RPC obtained from whole blood donation by a two centrifugation steps process, the "platelet rich plasma" or PRP method. Since the beginning of the 1970s, APCs became available, with in fact many different techniques leading to many APCs that may not be equivalent. Since the end of the 1980s, a new method of RPC preparation was developed, using the buffy-coat (BC-PC), providing a blood component with highly preserved platelet functions as compared to RPCs prepared by the PRP technique. Finally, the use of each of these components either native, or leuco-reduced, or suspended in a storage solution, or processed with a pathogen inactivation technique adds new layers of complexity to compare them. Innumerable references can be found in the literature describing in vitro functional parameters of platelet concentrates. Although it is clear that BC-RPC retain much more their in vitro functions than PRP-RPC, indicating that no one should use the latter any more, it is much more difficult to distinguish differences between other PCs. Conversely, only a very few studies have been published related to a comparison of clinical efficacy of RPC versus APC, the endpoints being mainly CCI. Similarly to the in vitro studies, although RPC prepared with the PRP method show the lowest CCIs, no clear difference exists between "modern" RPC and APC. Another factor that may impact policy decision is the occurrence of adverse reactions in recipients. When considering only comparable data, for example leuco-reduced RPC versus leuco-reduced APC, there is now evidence that the latter is more associated with adverse reactions in recipients: data from hemovigilance in France show that, although no difference is noted for febrile non haemolytic transfusion reactions, nor for bacteria contamination, the incidence of allergic adverse reactions is about four times higher with APC as compared with RPC. Other aspects may impact the decision: the fact that using APC in place of RPC reduces the total donor exposure of patients was considered critical in some countries to reduce the risk of transmission of blood transmissible disease. Finally, the cost of the components, much higher for APC may be considered.

Hematomas in multicomponent apheresis: searching for related factors

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to identify donation variables that could be related to the development of hematoma during multicomponent apheresis collections (MACs).

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This is an observational retrospective study where 1375 donors donated 5177 MACs during a 2-year period with two different machines (Amicus Crescendo [AC], Baxter Healthcare Corp.; and Trima Accel [TA], Gambro BCT). Variable data were recorded prospectively. In the multiple logistic regression analysis, generalized estimating equations were used with an exchangeable correlation matrix to take into account the nonindependence of several measurements from the same donor.

RESULTS

During the study period, 170 procedures failed due to hematoma (3.3%). Several variables were related to hematoma development in the adjusted model: operator experience (less than 500 procedures supervised vs. more; odds ratio [OR], 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-2.31), previous apheresis donations (first time vs. more than 16 donations; OR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.52-5.45), vein canalized (basilic vs. intermediate antebrachial or cephalic; OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.04-1.94), diastolic blood pressure (units divided by 10 mmHg; OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66-0.94), and type of machine used (TA high return limit configuration [RLC] setting configuration vs. AC; OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.27-2.96; TA low RLC setting configuration vs. AC; OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.83-1.84).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that hematoma in MAC is not a random event. Appropriate machine configuration in the TA could reduce the hematoma rate to a level comparable with that of the AC. Operator training and donor blood pressure are also interesting variables for study because these could be modified to reduce the hematoma rate.