51
|
Zada A, Peek MCL, Ahmed M, Anninga B, Baker R, Kusakabe M, Sekino M, Klaase JM, Ten Haken B, Douek M. Meta-analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer using the magnetic technique. Br J Surg 2016; 103:1409-19. [PMID: 27611729 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2016] [Revised: 05/19/2016] [Accepted: 06/30/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The standard for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), the dual technique (radiolabelled tracer and blue dye), has several drawbacks. A novel magnetic technique without these drawbacks has been evaluated in a number of clinical trials. It uses a magnetic tracer and a handheld magnetometer to identify and excise sentinel lymph nodes. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to assess the performance and utility of the magnetic in comparison to the standard technique. METHODS MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane online literature databases were used to identify all original articles evaluating the magnetic technique for SLNB published up to April 2016. Studies were included if they were prospectively conducted clinical trials comparing the magnetic with the standard technique for SLNB in patients with breast cancer. RESULTS Seven studies were included. The magnetic technique was non-inferior to the standard technique (z = 3·87, P < 0·001), at a 2 per cent non-inferiority margin. The mean identification rates for the standard and magnetic techniques were 96·8 (range 94·2-99·0) and 97·1 (94·4-98·0) per cent respectively (risk difference (RD) 0·00, 95 per cent c.i. -0·01 to 0·01; P = 0·690). The total lymph node retrieval was significantly higher with the magnetic compared with the standard technique: 2113 (1·9 per patient) versus 2000 (1·8 per patient) (RD 0·05, 0·03 to 0·06; P = 0·003). False-negative rates were 10·9 (range 6-22) per cent for the standard technique and 8·4 (2-22) per cent for the magnetic technique (RD 0·03, 0·00 to 0·06; P = 0·551). The mean discordance rate was 3·9 (range 1·7-6·9) per cent. CONCLUSION The magnetic technique for SLNB is non-inferior to the standard technique, with a high identification rate but with a significantly higher lymph node retrieval rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Zada
- Division of Cancer Studies, King's College, London, UK.,Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M C L Peek
- Division of Cancer Studies, King's College, London, UK
| | - M Ahmed
- Division of Cancer Studies, King's College, London, UK
| | - B Anninga
- Division of Cancer Studies, King's College, London, UK
| | - R Baker
- School of Business, University of Salford, Salford, UK
| | - M Kusakabe
- Advanced Technology Research Laboratory Research Centre for Food Safety, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Tokyo, Japan
| | - M Sekino
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Systems, Graduate School of Engineering, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - J M Klaase
- Surgical Oncology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - B Ten Haken
- Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - M Douek
- Division of Cancer Studies, King's College, London, UK. .,Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Karakatsanis A, Christiansen PM, Fischer L, Hedin C, Pistioli L, Sund M, Rasmussen NR, Jørnsgård H, Tegnelius D, Eriksson S, Daskalakis K, Wärnberg F, Markopoulos CJ, Bergkvist L. The Nordic SentiMag trial: a comparison of super paramagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) nanoparticles versus Tc(99) and patent blue in the detection of sentinel node (SN) in patients with breast cancer and a meta-analysis of earlier studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016; 157:281-294. [PMID: 27117158 PMCID: PMC4875068 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3809-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2016] [Accepted: 04/19/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of SPIO as a tracer in sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in breast cancer with Tc and patent blue in a multicentre prospective study and perform a meta-analysis of all published studies. It also aims to follow skin discoloration after SPIO injection and describe when and how it resolves. Totally 206 patients with early breast cancer were recruited. Tc and patent blue were administered in standard fashion. Patients were injected with SPIO (Sienna+) preoperatively. SNB was performed and detection rates were recorded for both methods. Skin discoloration was followed and documented postoperatively. Data extraction and subsequent meta-analysis of all previous studies were also performed. SN detection rates were similar between standard technique succeeded and SPIO both per patient (97.1 vs. 97.6 %, p = 0.76) as well as per node (91.3 vs. 93.3 %, p = 0.34), something which was not affected by the presence of malignancy. Concordance rates were also consistently high (98.0 % per patient and 95.9 % per node). Discoloring was present in 35.5 % of patients postoperatively, almost exclusively in breast conservation. It fades slowly and is still detectable in 8.6 % of patients after 15 months. Meta-analysis depicted similar detection rates (p = 0.71) and concordance rates (p = 0.82) per patient. However, it seems that SPIO is characterized by higher nodal retrieval (p < 0.001). SPIO is an effective method for the detection of SN in patients with breast cancer. It is comparable to the standard technique and seems to simplify logistics. Potential skin discoloration is something of consideration in patients planned for breast conservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Karakatsanis
- Section for Endocrine and Breast Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Peer Michael Christiansen
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital/Randers Regional Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lone Fischer
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital/Randers Regional Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Christina Hedin
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgery, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Lida Pistioli
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgery, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Malin Sund
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå, Sweden
| | | | | | - Daniel Tegnelius
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgery, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Staffan Eriksson
- Department of Surgery, Västmanland County Hospital, Västerås, Sweden
| | - Kosmas Daskalakis
- Section for Endocrine and Breast Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Fredrik Wärnberg
- Section for Endocrine and Breast Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Leif Bergkvist
- Center for Clinical Research Uppsala University and Department of Surgery, Västmanland County Hospital, Västerås, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|