The use of supraclavicular free flap with vascularized lymph node transfer for treatment of lymphedema: A prospective study of 100 consecutive cases

Vascularized gastroepiploic lymph node transfer significantly improves breast cancer-related lymphedema

BACKGROUND

Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) is a surgical treatment for lymphedema. Multiple methods have been described and each has significant disadvantages.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed VLNT in patients with upper extremity lymphedema resulting from breast cancer surgery. We used lymph nodes of the greater curvature of the stomach (VLNTg). We describe outcomes of the patients suffering from postmastectomy lymphedema who received VLNTg for treatment of lymphedema. Harvest from the periphery of the left gastroepiploic vessel was conducted.

RESULTS

We retrospectively reviewed data of 24 female patients suffering from lymphedema following breast cancer treatment who underwent lymph node transplantation from 2012 to 2017. Axillary lymphadenectomy had been performed in all cases. In 18 patients, upper limb lymphedema was present for at least 1 year (mean = 5.6 years; range, 1-15 years). In 6 patients, it was present for only a few months (mean = 5 months; range, 3-8 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The greater curvature of the stomach nodes (VLNTg) is an excellent option for the treatment of upper extremity lymphedema because there is no risk of complications and the scar is easily concealed. Improvement from lymphedema can be expected in a majority of patients.

Complications after vascularized jejunal mesenteric lymph node transfer: A 3-year experience

BACKGROUND

Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) is a well-established method for the surgical management of refractory extremity lymphedema. Generally, donor lymph nodes are harvested from the axilla, groin, or supraclavicular area. However, these sites offer their own disadvantages and introduce risk for inducing lymphedema at the surgical donor site. In our experience, the jejunal mesentery can be an excellent source of lymph nodes without the risk of donor site lymphedema. Long term complications are unknown for this procedure; we report our experience, complication rates, and lessons learned.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed for all patients at our institution undergoing surgical treatment of lymphedema using jejunal mesenteric VLNT from February 2015 to February 2018. Demographic data, length of follow up, and surgical complications were reviewed.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients have undergone jejunal VLNT at our institution during the three-year study period, with a total of 30 transfers. Five patients had a concurrent omental lymph node transfer. Average length of follow up was 17.6 months (range 1.0-36.8 months). There was one flap loss in this time frame (3.3%). Four patients developed hernias post-operatively (13.8%), and three had nonoperative small bowel obstructions (10.3%). One patient had a postoperative wound infection at the abdominal incision (3.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Jejunal VLNT can be an effective option for surgical treatment of lymphedema, without the risk of postoperative donor site lymphedema. Patients and surgeons should be aware of the risks of hernia and small bowel obstruction with this method compared to other lymph node sources.

Management of High-Output Chyle Leak after Harvesting of Vascularized Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes

Vascularized lymph node transfer is a physiologic microsurgical technique used for the treatment of lymphedema. As vascularized lymph node transfer is becoming more common, it is essential that one is aware of all potential complications associated with vascularized lymph node transfer and know how to avoid and manage them when they do occur. The authors recently encountered a complication after supraclavicular vascularized lymph node transfer that has not been previously reported. A patient developed a recalcitrant high-output (>500 ml/day) chyle leak in the neck donor site after supraclavicular vascularized lymph node transfer harvest. In this article, the authors share their experience with massive chyle leak and review the management strategies of how to effectively avoid and treat this potentially dangerous complication. This review of a previously unreported complication of supraclavicular vascularized lymph node transfer is timely and important, as this procedure is increasingly being offered to patients, and surgeons performing these procedures should be familiar with effectively managing this potentially dangerous complication. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Therapeutic, V.

The Lymph Node Content of Supraclavicular Lymph Node Flap: A Histological Study on Fresh Human Specimens

Introduction: Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) has become the established treatment for secondary lymphedema. The proposed mechanisms of VLNT include lymphangiogenesis and absorptive action of transplanted lymphatic tissue. Therefore, in theory, the lymph node content of lymph node flap is crucial to clinical response. The supraclavicular lymph node flap (SCLNF) has been described as one of the flap options for VLNT. However, its lymph node content has not been fully studied. The aim of this study is to find out the lymph node content of SCLNF with histological examination. Methods: Patients who required radical neck dissection or modified radical neck dissection due to cervical lymph node metastasis from head and neck cancer were included in this study. The SCLNF harvesting was performed as the first part of neck dissection. After flap harvesting, neck dissection was continued. The fresh SCLNF specimens were then sent for histological study. Results: Twelve SCLNFs were studied. The mean age of patients was 67.5 (range, 54-84) years. There were 10 males and 2 females. Seven flaps were harvested from the left side of neck, while five flaps were harvested from the right side of neck. The mean width, height, and thickness of SCLNF were 5.9 ± 0.6, 4.0 ± 0.5, and 1.8 ± 0.2 cm, respectively. The mean number of lymph nodes per flap was 8 ± 4.7 (range, 3-15). Conclusion: The lymph node content of SCLNF was confirmed. Its lymph node content is comparable to other lymph node flaps used in VLNT.

Comparisons of Submental and Groin Vascularized Lymph Node Flaps Transfer for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema

Background:

The vascularized groin and submental lymph node (VGLN and VSLN) flaps are valuable options in the treatment of lymphedema. This study was to compare outcomes between VGLN and VSLN transfers for breast cancer–related lymphedema.

Methods:

Between January 2008 and December 2016, VGLN and VSLN transfers for upper limb lymphedema were compared including flap characteristics, flap elevation time, complications, and limb circumference changes.

Results:

All flaps survived. Similar vein (2.6 versus 3.2 mm; P = 0.3) and artery diameter (2.1 versus 2.8 mm; P = 0.3) and number of lymph nodes (3 versus 4; P = 0.4) were found between VGLN and VSLN groups, respectively. Circumferential reduction rate was higher in VSLN than VGLN (P = 0.04) group. Vascular complication rate with salvage rate was not statistically different between the 2 groups. Donor-site complication and total complication rates were statistically higher in VGLN than VSLN flaps (7.7% versus 0%, P = 0.004; 46.2% versus 23.3%, P = 0.002). At a mean 39.8 ± 22.4 months, the circumferential reduction rate was statistically higher in VSLN than in the VGLN group (55.5 ± 14.3% versus 48.4 ± 23.9%, P = 0.04). Both flaps were effectively decreased in the episodes of cellulitis.

Conclusions:

Both VGLN and VSLN flaps are valuable surgical options in treating breast cancer–related lymphedema. However, the VSLN flap for breast cancer–related lymphedema is better in providing more significant improvements in limb circumference, a faster flap harvest time, decreased complication rates, and minimal donor-site iatrogenic lymphedema.

[Soft tissue sarcomas: limb salvage using reconstructive plastic surgery techniques]

The treatment of choice for soft tissue sarcomas with local involvement is still the complete surgical removal into healthy tissue. The aim of surgery is to achieve tumor-free resection margins in the sense of a R0 resection. No other treatment option can equally replace this important oncological condition. The enormous development in the field of reconstructive plastic surgery and in particular the advances in flap techniques and microsurgery enable limb salvage and the functional reconstruction even in the case of extensive tumors.

The lateral intercostal artery perforator as an alternative donor vessel for free vascularized lymph node transplantation

Chronic lymphedema is caused by an impairment of the lymphatic system due to primary or secondary causes. Vascularized lymph node transplantation (VLNT) is currently the most promising and frequently used technique besides lymphaticovenous anastomosis. However, the vessel anatomy in the lateral thoracic region is sometimes quite variable. Based on our experiences with vascular anatomical inconstancy in the lateral thoracic region, we planned a lateral intercostal artery perforator flap for VLNT in a female patient with chronic stage II lymphedema of both legs after cervical cancer treatment. After surgery, the patient reported significant improvement in limb volume and the accompanying symptoms. The limb circumference was reduced by an average of 19.2% at 6 months postoperatively. Despite having a short pedicle and small vessel caliber, the lateral intercostal artery perforator flap can safely be used for VLNT in lymphedema patients with anatomical variants.

Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer for Lymphedema

Advances in our understanding of the lymphatic system and the pathogenesis of lymphedema have resulted in the development of effective surgical treatments. Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) involves the microvascular transplantation of functional lymph nodes into an extremity to restore physiological lymphatic function. It is most commonly performed by transferring combined deep inferior epigastric artery perforator and superficial inguinal lymph node flaps for postmastectomy breast reconstruction. For patients who do not require or are unable to undergo free abdominal breast reconstruction or have lymphedema affecting the lower extremity, several other VLNT options are available. These include flaps harvested from within the axillary, inguinal, or cervical lymph node basins, and lymph node flaps from within the abdominal cavity. This article reviews the lymph node flap options and techniques available for VLNT for lymphedema.

Combining Autologous Breast Reconstruction and Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer

Breast cancer patients are at risk for developing postmastectomy lymphedema syndrome of the ipsilateral upper extremity following treatment for breast cancer in the setting of an axillary dissection, postoperative radiation, and chemotherapy. For patients suffering from lymphedema who are also seeking breast reconstruction, combining an autologous abdominal free flap with a vascularized inguinal lymph node transfer provides patients the opportunity to have an aesthetic breast reconstruction as well as the potential to improve their lymphedema in a single operation. The present article aims to provide a description of the salient features of this approach including the preoperative preparation, the surgical technique, the postoperative management and complications, and a summary of the outcomes.

Vascularized lymph node transfer for treatment of extremity lymphedema: An overview of current controversies regarding donor sites, recipient sites and outcomes

As lymphatic microsurgery has become more common, vascularized lymph node transfer ascended to the forefront in many centers for the surgical management of advanced stages of lymphedema showing substantial clinical improvement. However, no consensus has been reached among experts regarding many details of the procedures, including patient selection criteria, type of treatment, donor, and recipient sites and postoperative evaluation of the outcome. Here, we will review these issues and provide the current results of this procedure.

Improvement of the efficacy of vascularized lymph node transfer for lower-extremity lymphedema via a prefabricated lympho-venous shunt through lymphaticovenular anastomosis between the efferent lymphatic vessel and small vein in the elevated vascularized lymph node

BACKGROUND

Following vascularized lymph node (VLN) transfer (VLNT), the VLN may be at a risk for sclerosis because of efferent lymphatic vessel obstruction. We developed a new technique to prevent VLN sclerosis via a prefabricated lympho-venous (LV) shunt. This study compared the treatment outcomes of single VLNT with prefabricated LV shunt, conventional multiple VLNTs, and conventional single VLNT.

METHODS

Overall, 47 limbs of 45 patients that underwent VLNT for lower-extremity lymphedema (LEL) in late clinical stage II/III were divided into 3 groups: conventional single VLNT group (control; 21 limbs where 4 had primary LEL), multiple VLNTs group (13 limbs where 3 had primary LEL), and prefabricated LV shunt group (13 limbs where 4 had primary LEL). In the prefabricated LV shunt group, lymphaticovenular anastomosis between the efferent lymphatic vessel and small vein in the elevated VLN were performed simultaneously with VLNT.

RESULTS

Although venous thrombosis at the anastomosis site was observed in 1 case, it was salvaged by re-anastomosis, and all VLNs survived. No other complications were observed. The LEL index significantly improved in the prefabricated LV shunt group compared with that in the control group (28.0 ± 1.7 vs 20.9 ± 1.5, P = 0.02). In the prefabricated LV shunt group, all VLNs survived functionally, and the average size of the transferred lymph nodes was significantly larger than that of the control group (5.7 ± 0.1 vs 4.3 ± 0.2 mm, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Prefabricated LV shunt may improve the efficacy of VLNT.

The surgical anatomy of the vascularized lateral thoracic artery lymph node flap-A cadaver study

BACKGROUND

One promising surgical treatment of lymphedema is the VLNT. Lymph nodes can be harvested from different locations; inguinal, axillary, and supraclavicular ones are used most often. The aim of our study was to assess the surgical anatomy of the lateral thoracic artery lymph node flap.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 16 lymph node flaps from nine cadavers were dissected. Flap markings were made between the anterior and posterior axillary line in dimensions of 10 × 5 cm. Axillary lymph nodes were analyzed using high-resolution ultrasound and morphologically via dissection. The cutaneous vascular territory of the lateral thoracic artery was highlighted via dye injections, the pedicle recorded by length, and diameter and its location in a specific coordinate system.

RESULTS

On average, 3.10 ± 1.6 lymph nodes were counted per flap via ultrasound. Macroscopic inspection showed on average 13.40 ± 3.13. Their mean dimensions were 3.76 ± 1.19 mm in width and 7.12 ± 0.98 mm in length by ultrasonography, and 3.83 ± 2.14 mm and 6.30 ± 4.43 mm via dissection. The external diameter of the lateral thoracic artery averaged 2.2 ± 0.40 mm with a mean pedicle length of 3.6 ± 0.82 cm. 87.5% of the specimens had a skin paddle.

CONCLUSIONS

The lateral thoracic artery-based lymph node flap proved to be a suitable alternative to other VLNT donor sites.

Abdominoplasty with Lymphatic Microsurgery for Patients with Secondary Lower Extremity Lymphedema

BACKGROUND

Patients with secondary lower extremity lymphedema often develop suprapubic lymphedema. The authors developed a novel surgical method of shaping the lower abdomen and debulking suprapubic lymphedema with simultaneous reconstruction of lymphatic flow in case of lower extremity lymphedema.

METHODS

A fleur-de-lis skin incision pattern was performed for horizontal and vertical abdominal skin and fat resection. A caudally based isosceles triangular flap was created on the central suprapubic region to reduce wound tension at the intersection of the horizontal and vertical incisions. After resection and debulking of the suprapubic region, a lymphaticovenular anastomosis between the efferent lymphatic vessel of the groin node and the superficial inferior epigastric vein was created or vascularized lymph node transfer to the groin region was performed to restore lymphatic flow. Lymphaticovenular anastomosis and lymph node transfer were also performed at the lower extremities to improve lower extremity lymphedema. Perioperative change in limb volume was evaluated using the lower extremity lymphedema index, and lymphatic function was evaluated by lymphoscintigraphy.

RESULTS

Simultaneous abdominoplasty and reconstructive lymphatic microsurgery were performed in 11 patients. The lower extremity lymphedema index improved perioperatively, with a significant difference (p < 0.01). In eight patients who underwent lymphoscintigraphy before and after surgery, the lymphatic function was found to have not deteriorated in any limb.

CONCLUSIONS

When simultaneous lymphatic microsurgical procedures and careful observation for complications were performed, abdominoplasty resulted in good outcomes in patients with lower extremity lymphedema and suprapubic lymphedema without worsening of lymphedema.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, V.

Lymphedema: From diagnosis to treatment

Lymphedema is a chronic and progressive disorder resulting from impaired lymphatic system function. In developed countries, upper extremity lymphedema is mainly the consequence of breast cancer surgery in which axillary lymph node dissection and radiation alter upper extremity lymphatic flow. Diagnosis of lymphedema is made clinically. Nevertheless, there are numerous diagnostic tools available for disease staging. Recently, a new technology namely magnetic resonance lymphangiography has emerged in the medical field to assist in both diagnosis and management. There are non-surgical and surgical treatment options available. Non-surgical methods are always the first-line treatment; however, surgical options can be explored in appropriate patients. Recent studies focus on the prevention of lymphedema using surgical techniques utilizing axillary reverse mapping to delineate arm lymphatics from axillary lymphatics. Finding the most suitable technique for each type of lymphedema with variable stages is one of the most complicated decisions for practitioners. More studies are needed to reveal the exact biology of lymphedema to ensure complete understanding of the disease and improve outcomes.

Implantable Doppler monitoring of buried free flaps during vascularized lymph node transfer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Reliable flap monitoring is crucial to the success of free tissue transfer, including vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT). However, no large-scale study has examined implantable Doppler monitoring in VLNT. We aimed to determine whether an implantable Doppler system can reliably monitor flap perfusion during VLNT and also to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of this system for detecting compromise in the monitored vessel.

METHODS

An analysis of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent buried VLNT with implantable Doppler monitoring between 2014 and 2015 was performed.

RESULTS

A consecutive series of 100 patients underwent VLNT with implantable Doppler monitoring. Five cases required return to the operating room for flap exploration due to a change in Doppler signal quality. All compromised flaps were salvaged. The sensitivity of the implantable Doppler system for flap monitoring was 100%, the specificity was 97.9%, the positive predictive value was 60%, and the negative predictive value was 100%. The false-positive rate was 2%.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest reported series of implantable Doppler monitoring of free flap perfusion during VLNT. Our experience suggests that this is a safe and effective technique for postoperative monitoring of VLNT.