Transoral robotic surgery: A multicenter study to assess feasibility, safety, and surgical margins

Oncological and Functional Outcomes of Transoral Robotic Surgery and Endoscopic Laryngopharyngeal Surgery for Hypopharyngeal Cancer: A Systematic Review

Objectives

Hypopharyngeal carcinoma (HPC) is a head and neck carcinoma with poor prognosis. Traditional laryngopharyngectomy offered promising oncological outcomes at the cost of functional outcomes. The recent advent in transoral robotic surgery (TORS), an organ-preserving surgery, has opened up new perspectives in the treatment for HPC. Here, we evaluate minimally invasive organ preservation surgery [TORS and endoscopic laryngopharyngeal surgery (ELPS)] for HPC in terms of feasibility and oncological and functional outcomes.

Methods

This is a systematic review. Six databases [CUHK Full-Text Journals, Embase 1910 to 2021, Ovid Emcare, Ovid MEDLINE (R), CINAHL, PubMed] were searched for articles and primary studies for TORS and ELPS for HPC. Screening was completed using predefined inclusion or exclusion criteria.

Results

A total of 8 studies on TORS and 3 studies on ELPS were eventually chosen after full-text review. For studies on TORS, 61.3% of patients (84 out of 137) still survived at the last follow-up with a mean follow-up time of 23.20 months (range: 12.8–37.21 months). Severe intraoperative and postoperative complications have not been reported. No cases of TORS required a conversion to open surgery. Swallowing function was optimal postoperatively with only 6 patients eventually required a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) for feeding. Disease-specific survival was taken as the parameter for the measurement of oncological outcomes. A total of 2 studies reported a disease-specific survival of 100% within their follow-up period of 1 and 1.5 years, respectively. Another 2 studies reported a 2-year DSS of 89 and 98%, respectively. A 5-year DSS of 100% in early stage and 74% in late stage were achieved in one study. Another study also reported a 5-year DSS of 91.7%. For studies of ELPS, a 5- and 3-year disease-specific survival of 100% were achieved in 2 studies. Patients who underwent ELPS had good postoperative swallowing function with no PEG placement. There were also no other fatal complications.

Conclusions

Both TORS and ELPS for HPC provide satisfactory long-term oncological and functional outcomes improving postoperative quality of life of patients.

Transoral robotic surgery adoption and safety in treatment of oropharyngeal cancers

BACKGROUND

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2009 for the treatment of oropharyngeal cancers (oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma [OPSCC]). This study investigated the adoption and safety of TORS.

METHODS

All patients who underwent TORS for OPSCC in the National Cancer Data Base from 2010 to 2016 were selected. Trends in the positive margin rate (PMR), 30-day unplanned readmission, and early postoperative mortality were evaluated. Outcomes after TORS, nonrobotic surgery (NRS), and nonsurgical treatment were compared with matched-pair survival analyses.

RESULTS

From 2010 to 2016, among 73,661 patients with OPSCC, 50,643 were treated nonsurgically, 18,024 were treated with NRS, and 4994 were treated with TORS. TORS utilization increased every year from 2010 (n = 363; 4.2%) to 2016 (n = 994; 8.3%). The TORS PMR for base of tongue malignancies decreased significantly over the study period (21.6% in 2010-2011 vs 15.8% in 2015-2016; P = .03). The TORS PMR at high-volume centers (≥10 cases per year; 11.2%) was almost half that of low-volume centers (<10 cases per year; 19.3%; P < .001). The rates of 30-day unplanned readmission (4.1%) and 30-day postoperative mortality (1.0%) after TORS were low and did not vary over time. High-volume TORS centers had significantly lower rates of 30-day postoperative mortality than low-volume centers (0.5% vs 1.5%; P = .006). In matched-pair analyses controlling for clinicopathologic cofactors, 30-, 60-, and 90-day posttreatment mortality did not vary among patients with OPSCC treated with TORS, NRS, or nonsurgical treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

TORS has become widely adopted and remains safe across the country with a very low risk of severe complications comparable to the risk with NRS. Although safety is excellent nationally, high-volume TORS centers have superior outcomes with lower rates of positive margins and early postoperative mortality.

Reconstruction following transoral robotic surgery for head and neck cancer: Systematic review

We performed a systematic review to characterize reconstructive modalities and postoperative surgical outcomes following TORS resection. A search of the PubMed, SCOPUS, and EMBASE databases was conducted to identify studies describing patients undergoing reconstruction of TORS defects. Twenty-six studies met inclusion criteria, consisting of 260 patients who underwent TORS resection followed by reconstruction. Twenty-one studies reported tumor classification information, with TORS performed for 44 (23.0%) T1, 86 (45.0%) T2, 33 (17.3%) T3, and 28 (14.7%) T4 tumors. Eighteen distinct reconstructive modalities were described in the studies identified, including nine unique free flap types. The most commonly performed reconstruction was the radial forearm free flap (RFFF), accounting for 121/260 (46.5%) of reconstructions performed. Reported surgical complications included 5 pharyngocutaneous fistulae, 13 hemorrhagic complications, 24 infectious complications, and 5 free flap failures. Our findings demonstrate favorable surgical outcomes but minimal quantitative functional data to compare reconstructive options following TORS.

Current Trends in Precision Medicine and Next-Generation Sequencing in Head and Neck Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

As the field of oncology enters the era of precision medicine and targeted therapies, we have come to realize that there may be no single "magic bullet" for patients with head and neck cancer. While immune check point inhibitors and some targeted therapeutics have shown great promise in improving oncologic outcomes, the current standard of care in most patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains a combination of surgery, radiation, and/or cytotoxic chemotherapy. Nevertheless, advances in precision medicine, next-generation sequencing (NGS), and targeted therapies have a potential future in the treatment of HNSCC. These roles include increased patient treatment stratification based on predictive biomarkers or targetable mutations and novel combinatorial regimens with existing HNSCC treatments. There remain challenges to precision medicine and NGS in HNSCC, including intertumor and intratumor heterogeneity, challenging targets, and need for further trials validating the utility of NGS and precision medicine. Additionally, there is a need for evidence-based practice guidelines to assist clinicians on how to appropriately incorporate NGS in care for HNSCC. In this review, we describe the current state of precision medicine and NGS in HNSCC and opportunities for future advances in this challenging but important field.

Phase II Randomized Trial of Transoral Surgery and Low-Dose Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Resectable p16+ Locally Advanced Oropharynx Cancer: An ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group Trial (E3311)

PURPOSE

Definitive or postoperative chemoradiation (CRT) is curative for human papillomavirus-associated (HPV+) oropharynx cancer (OPC) but induces significant toxicity. As a deintensification strategy, we studied primary transoral surgery (TOS) and reduced postoperative radiation therapy (RT) in intermediate-risk HPV+ OPC.

METHODS

E3311 is a phase II randomized trial of reduced- or standard-dose postoperative RT for resected stage III-IVa (American Joint Committee on Cancer-seventh edition) HPV+ OPC, determined by pathologic parameters. Primary goals were feasibility of prospective multi-institutional study of TOS for HPV+ OPC, and oncologic efficacy (2-year progression-free survival) of TOS and adjuvant therapy in intermediate-risk patients after resection. TOS plus 50 Gy was considered promising if the lower limit of the exact 90% binomial confidence intervals exceeded 85%. Quality of life and swallowing were measured by functional assessment of cancer therapy-head and neck and MD Anderson Dysphagia Index.

RESULTS

Credentialed surgeons performed TOS for 495 patients. Eligible and treated patients were assigned as follows: arm A (low risk, n = 38) enrolled 11%, intermediate risk arms B (50 Gy, n = 100) or C (60 Gy, n = 108) randomly allocated 58%, and arm D (high risk, n = 113) enrolled 31%. With a median 35.2-month follow-up for 359 evaluable (eligible and treated) patients, 2-year progression-free survival Kaplan-Meier estimate is 96.9% (90% CI, 91.9 to 100) for arm A (observation), 94.9% (90% CI, 91.3 to 98.6]) for arm B (50 Gy), 96.0% (90% CI, 92.8 to 99.3) for arm C (60 Gy), and 90.7% (90% CI, 86.2 to 95.4) for arm D (66 Gy plus weekly cisplatin). Treatment arm distribution and oncologic outcome for ineligible or step 2 untreated patients (n = 136) mirrored the 359 evaluable patients. Exploratory comparison of functional assessment of cancer therapy-head and neck total scores between arms B and C is presented.

CONCLUSION

Primary TOS and reduced postoperative RT result in outstanding oncologic outcome and favorable functional outcomes in intermediate-risk HPV+ OPC.

Quantifying Tumor and Vasculature Deformations during Laryngoscopy

Retractors and scopes used in head and neck surgery to provide adequate surgical exposure also deform critical structures in the region. Surgeons typically use preoperative imaging to plan and guide their tumor resections, however the large tissue deformation resulting from placement of retractors and scopes reduces the utility of preoperative imaging as a reliable roadmap. We quantify the extent of tumor and vasculature deformation in patients with tumors of the larynx and pharynx undergoing diagnostic laryngoscopy. A mean tumor displacement of 1.02 cm was observed between the patients' pre- and intra-operative states. Mean vasculature displacement at key bifurcation points was 0.99 cm. Registration to the hyoid bone can reduce tumor displacement to 0.67 cm and improve carotid stem angle deviations but increase overall vasculature displacement. The large deformation results suggest limitations in reliance on preoperative imaging and that using specific landmarks intraoperatively or having more intraoperative information could help to compensate for these deviations and ultimately improve surgical success.

Current Status of Transoral Surgery for Patients With Early-Stage Pharyngeal and Laryngeal Cancers in Japan

As the laryngopharynx is closely related to swallowing, speech, and phonation, it is necessary to consider not only disease control but also a minimally invasive approach for the treatment of laryngopharyngeal cancer. Transoral surgery has been reported to be a minimally invasive method for treating these diseases. Transoral videolaryngoscopic surgery (TOVS) and endoscopic laryngo-pharyngeal surgery (ELPS) have been developed in Japan and recently emerged as treatments for patients with early stage pharyngeal and laryngeal cancers. However, securing an appropriate field of view and a narrow operating space during TOVS or ELPS are critical issues to be resolved for these surgeries. The clinical significance and safety of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) using the da Vinci Surgical System have been widely reported to provide surgeons with increased visualization and magnification, resulting in precise surgical margins and rapid functional recovery. In this context, a multi-institutional clinical study was conducted to evaluate the treatment outcomes of TORS for the treatment of laryngopharyngeal cancer in Japan, and the da Vinci Surgical System for oral robot-assisted surgery for these diseases was approved by the Pharmaceutical Affairs Agency in August 2018. This review provides an overview of the therapeutic effects of TOVS, ELPS, and TORS, with a particular focus on these therapeutic results in Japan.

Transoral Robotic Surgery

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) became a valuable new head and neck surgery approach from the past decade since its approval. TORS was initially conceived for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC); now, the indications are gradually extrapolated into other subsites. There have been numerous studies comparing the outcomes following surgical and non-surgical treatment, especially for oropharyngeal cancers. TORS for laryngeal cancers is in its infancy, and only a few reports are describing it. Many report suggestive of better functional outcomes following TORS, but level 1 evidence is still lacking. With the further development of novel, flexible, miniaturized robots, it is highly likely to expand TORS indications further. This article provides an overview of TORS in head and neck cancers.

[Update Treatment HPV-16-positive Oropharyngeal Carcinoma]

BACKGROUND

Oropharynx carcinoma (OPSCC) is a genetically heterogeneous tumor group with high prognostic diversity due to its worldwide increase in incidence and the association with the human papillomavirus HPV 16, but also chronic tobacco/alcohol consumption.

OBJECTIVE

The review attempts to present the current view on therapy and prevention of OPSCC with respect to association with HPV 16.

MATERIAL & METHODS

The overview is based on the current relevant literature as well as current studies.

RESULTS & DISCUSSION

The OPSCC presents itself as a very complex, genetically heterogeneous group of head and neck tumors, which should therefore be considered in detail. The currently contradictory trial situation of retrospective studies versus prospective trials, the current TNM classification (8th edition) and the scarce prospective data arguing for non-inferiority of therapy de-intensification attempts currently admonish to encourage a more conservative treatment.

Days alive and out of hospital following transoral robotic surgery: Cohort study of 262 patients with head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Days alive and out of hospital (DAOH) is a validated outcome in clinical trials, since it reflects procedure-associated morbidity and mortality. Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has become a widely adopted procedure with increasing demand for knowledge and data on morbidity.

METHODS

Retrospective single-center assessment of a prospective TORS database comprising patients treated for malignancy between 2013 and 2018 using DAOH to describe procedure- and disease-related morbidity the first 12-postoperative months.

RESULTS

For 262 patients, median DAOH₃₆₅ was 357 days (IQR 351-360). Indications for TORS were (i) primary curative resection (61%), (ii) salvage resection (15%), and (iii) diagnostic work-up of cancer of unknown primary in the head and neck (24%). Median DAOH₃₆₅ was 359 days (IQR 351-361 days), 348 days (IQR 233-355), and 357 days (351-361), respectively. Pneumonia had the highest impact in DAOH₃₆₅ reduction.

CONCLUSION

Total median DAOH₃₆₅ after TORS was 357 days. The main cause leading to DAOH₃₆₅ reduction was pneumonia.

Supervised Autonomous Electrosurgery for Soft Tissue Resection

Surgical resection is the current clinical standard of care for treating squamous cell carcinoma. Maintaining an adequate tumor resection margin is the key to a good surgical outcome, but tumor edge delineation errors are inevitable with manual surgery due to difficulty in visualization and hand-eye coordination. Surgical automation is a growing field of robotics to relieve surgeon burdens and to achieve a consistent and potentially better surgical outcome. This paper reports a novel robotic supervised autonomous electrosurgery technique for soft tissue resection achieving millimeter accuracy. The tumor resection procedure is decomposed to the subtask level for a more direct understanding and automation. A 4-DOF suction system is developed, and integrated with a 6-DOF electrocautery robot to perform resection experiments. A novel near-infrared fluorescent marker is manually dispensed on cadaver samples to define a pseudotumor, and intraoperatively tracked using a dual-camera system. The autonomous dual-robot resection cooperation workflow is proposed and evaluated in this study. The integrated system achieves autonomous localization of the pseudotumor by tracking the near-infrared marker, and performs supervised autonomous resection in cadaver porcine tongues (N=3). The three pseudotumors were successfully removed from porcine samples. The evaluated average surface and depth resection errors are 1.19 and 1.83mm, respectively. This work is an essential step towards autonomous tumor resections.

Treatment De-intensification for HPV-associated Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Definitive Surgery Paradigm

Human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV+OPSCC) constitutes the majority of head and neck diagnoses within the United States. Patients with HPV+OPSCC have biologically and demographically distinct disease, leading to high cure rates after standard treatments. This long survivorship period coupled with the toxicity of standard treatments makes de-intensification strategies an urgent research question. Surgery has generally been avoided for HPV+OPSCC as historical surgical techniques were invasive and morbid. With the advent of minimally invasive transoral techniques, definitive surgical options are becoming more popular. Minimally invasive surgery offers unique opportunities in a de-intensification paradigm, including more detailed patient selection, radiation volume reduction, and radiation dose de-intensification. Nevertheless, careful patient selection must be exercised as surgical defects may lead to quality of life decrements beyond what is gained through de-intensification. Ongoing phase III efforts will help clarify the patient cohorts best suited for surgically oriented de-intensification.

Preemptive Utilization of Anterior Belly of the Digastric Muscle Flaps in Transoral Robotic Radical Tonsillectomy

Objective

To demonstrate the use of an anterior belly of the digastric muscle flap (ABDMF) during transoral robotic radical tonsillectomy (TORRT) with concomitant neck dissection with the intent of preventing the formation of postoperative pharyngocutaneous fistulas.

Study Design

Retrospective study.

Setting

Single academic tertiary care center.

Methods

In this study, all patients were included who underwent TORRT plus limited pharyngectomy with concomitant neck dissection and ABDMF for the treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma between September 2012 and September 2020. The rate of fistula formation was assessed in patients with preemptive utilization of ABDMF.

Results

A total of 43 patients underwent TORRT with neck dissection and ABDMF. No patients developed a fistula in the postoperative period or associated morbidity with the use of this flap.

Conclusion

Preemptive use of ABDMF in TORRT with concomitant neck dissection represents a reconstructive option that may help prevent the formation of pharyngocutaneous fistula by reinforcing the posteroinferior boundary of the parapharyngeal space.

Robotic surgery may improve overall survival for T1 and T2 tumors of the hypopharynx: An NCDB cohort study

BACKGROUND

Hypopharyngeal cancer is associated with poor survival. Robotic surgery is emerging as a treatment for hypopharyngeal tumors, but no rigorous data are available to assess its effect on survival.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to identify patients with T1 and T2 hypopharyngeal tumors undergoing robotic surgery, laser surgery, and primary radiation with or without chemotherapy from 2010 to 2016. All adult patients with available staging and no distant metastasis were included.

RESULTS

We compared 57 patients undergoing robotic surgery, 236 undergoing laser surgery, and 5,742 undergoing primary radiation. Compared to laser surgery, patients undergoing robotic surgery were significantly more likely to have negative margins, neck dissection, lower incomes, and care at an academic center. Rates of robotic surgery also significantly increased from 2010 to 2015. After multivariate regression, robotic surgery was associated with significantly improved overall survival compared to laser surgery and primary radiation.

CONCLUSION

Robotic surgery improves overall survival for T1 and T2 hypopharyngeal tumors compared to laser surgery and primary radiation in this NCDB cohort. This effect may be mediated by decreased positive margin rates relative to laser surgery. Rates of hypopharyngeal robotic surgery are expected to increase with wider adoption of robotic platforms and may improve overall survival rates for hypopharyngeal cancer.

Trans-oral robotic surgery for head and neck cancers using the Medrobotics Flex® system: the Adelaide cohort

Trans-oral robotic surgery for head and neck cancers can be performed using rigid, multi-port robots with linear access but the Medrobotics Flex^® system offers an alternative as it is endo-luminal, single-port, and uses flexible instruments. To assess the utility of the Medrobotics Flex^® system for head and neck cancer (HNC) resections. A retrospective review of all HNC resections done over a 2.5-year period (Jan 2017-July 2019) at the Memorial Hospital, using the Flex^® system. Data collected include patient demographics, tumour site, tumour stage, p16 status, smoking history, surgery performed, histologic margins, complications, overall survival, recurrence, and adjuvant treatments received. There were 49 head and neck cancer cases in total done using the Medrobotics Flex^® system. Median age 60 years, with M:F ratio 3.5:1. Outcomes: oropharyngeal cancers (82%), p16 positive (89%), overall survival (94%), local recurrence (6%), and adjuvant treatment (84%). Cancer procedures done included lateral oropharyngectomy (43%), tongue base mucosectomy (27%), tongue base resection (18%), and others (12%) which include a single case each of supraglottic laryngectomy, hypopharyngeal tumour resection, partial pharyngectomy, partial glossectomy, and vocal cord tumour resection. Clear margins were related to tumour T stage and achieved for T1 tonsil cancer (75%), T2 tonsil cancer (70%), T3 tonsil cancer (50%), T1 tongue base cancer (80%), and T2 tongue base cancer (66.7%). Median operating time with neck dissection was 2 h 40 min, whilst median length of hospital stay was 1 day (IQR 1-7 days). Complications included a single case each of secondary haemorrhage (managed conservatively), oro-cervical fistula, wound infection, tongue numbness, and a medical event. There was no primary haemorrhage and no mortality. The Medrobotics Flex^® system is a safe and reliable tool for head and neck cancer surgery.

Feeding Tube Placement Following Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors that may predict the need for feeding tubes in patients undergoing transoral robotic surgery (TORS) in the perioperative setting.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Academic tertiary center.

METHODS

A retrospective series of patients undergoing TORS for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) was identified between October 2016 and November 2019 at a single tertiary academic center. Patient data were gathered, such as frailty information, tumor characteristics, and treatment, including need for adjuvant therapy. Multiple logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with feeding tube placement following TORS.

RESULTS

A total of 138 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 60.2 years (range, 37-88 years) and 81.9% were male. Overall 82.9% of patients had human papilloma virus-associated tumors, while 28.3% were current or former smokers with a smoking history ≥10 pack-years. Eleven patients (8.0%) had a nasogastric or gastrostomy tube placed at some point during their treatment. Five patients (3.6%) had feeding tubes placed perioperatively (<4 weeks after TORS), of which 3 were nasogastric tubes. Six patients (4.3%) had feeding tubes placed in the periadjuvant treatment setting for multifactorial reasons; 5 of which were gastrostomy tubes. Only 1 patient (0.7%) was gastrostomy dependent 1 year after surgery. Multiple logistic regression did not demonstrate any significant predictive variables affecting perioperative feeding tube placement following TORS for OPSCC.

CONCLUSIONS

Feeding tubes are seldom required after TORS for early-stage OPSCC. With appropriate multidisciplinary planning and care, patients may reliably avoid the need for feeding tube placement following TORS for OPSCC.

Preoperative predictors of difficult oropharyngeal exposure for transoral robotic surgery: The Pharyngoscore

BACKGROUND

Insufficient exposure may require termination of procedure in transoral robotic surgery (TORS). The aim of study was to develop a "Pharyngoscore" to quantify the risk of difficult oropharyngeal exposure (DOE) before TORS.

METHODS

Three-hundred six patients undergoing any surgical procedure at one Academic Hospital were prospectively enrolled. Oropharynx was exposed with Feyh-Kastenbauer retractor. Exposure was evaluated by direct and endoscopic visualization of the four oropharyngeal subsites. Preoperative clinical/anthropometric parameters were studied in good oropharyngeal exposure and DOE groups. Logistic regression was performed to explore association between clinical/anthropometric parameters and DOE. Statistically significant parameters at multivariate analysis were incorporated into a nomogram.

RESULTS

Sixty-five (21.2%) subjects were characterized by DOE. Variables associated with DOE at univariate analysis were male (p = 0.031), modified Mallampati Class (MMC) ≥ III (p < 0.001), smaller interincisor gap (p < 0.001), and larger neck circumference (p = 0.006). MMC, interincisor gap, and neck circumference were significant at multivariate analysis and were presented with a nomogram for creating the Pharyngoscore.

CONCLUSIONS

The Pharyngoscore is a promising tool for calculating DOE probability before TORS.

Oncologic outcomes of transoral robotic surgery for HPV-negative oropharyngeal carcinomas

BACKGROUND

Patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) continue to experience disappointing outcomes following chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and appreciable morbidity following historical surgical approaches. We aimed to investigate the oncologic outcomes and perioperative morbidity of a transoral robotic surgery (TORS) approach to surgically resectable HPV-negative OPSCC.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis HPV-negative OPSCC patients who underwent TORS, neck dissection and pathology-guided adjuvant therapy (2005-2017).

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients (91.1% stage III/IV) were included. Three-year overall survival, locoregional control, and disease-free survival were 85.5%, 84.4%, and 73.6%, respectively (median follow-up 30.6 months, interquartile range 18.4-66.6). Eighteen (32.1%) patients underwent adjuvant radiotherapy and 20 (39.3%) underwent adjuvant CRT. Perioperative mortality occurred in one (1.8%) patient and hemorrhage occurred in two (3.6%) patients. Long-term gastrostomy and tracheostomy rates were 5.4% and 0.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The TORS approach for resectable HPV-negative OPSCC can achieve encouraging oncologic outcomes with infrequent morbidity.

Indications and Clinical Outcomes of Transoral Robotic Surgery and Free Flap Reconstruction

We reviewed the indications, peroperative feasibility, and postoperative clinical outcomes of our first 50 consecutive patients who underwent free flap reconstruction after TORS for complex pharyngeal defects at our institution. We analyzed indications according to previous radiotherapy, the size of the resection, and the transoral exposure of critical structures. We reviewed surgical data, postoperative complications, and functional outcomes comprising tracheostomy and alimentation management. Indications were upfront surgery (34%), a second primary surgery after radiotherapy (28%), or salvage surgery after chemoradiotherapy failure (38%). Localizations were the tongue base (44%), tonsillar fossa (28%), pharyngeal wall (22%), and soft palate (6%). T-classifications were T1 (6%), T2 (52%), T3 (20%), and T4 (22%). The mean length of the surgery was 574 min. Two patients were intraoperatively converted to a conventional approach at the beginning of the learning curve. In conclusion, TORS and free flap reconstruction in complex situations were associated with low rates of postoperative complications and satisfactory functional outcomes. They were, however, associated with a renewed learning curve.

Image-guided surgery in otolaryngology: A review of current applications and future directions in head and neck surgery

Image-guided surgery (IGS) has become a widely adopted technology in otolaryngology. Since its introduction nearly three decades ago, IGS technology has developed rapidly and improved real-time intraoperative visualization for a diverse array of clinical indications. As usability, accessibility, and clinical experiences with IGS increase, its potential applications as an adjunct in many surgical procedures continue to expand. Here, we describe the basic components of IGS and review both the current state and future directions of IGS in otolaryngology, with attention to current challenges to its application in surgery of the nonrigid upper aerodigestive tract.

Characterizing postoperative physiologic swallow function following transoral robotic surgery for early stage tonsil, base of tongue, and unknown primary human papillomavirus-associated squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Data objectively evaluating acute post-transoral robotic surgery (TORS) swallow function are limited. Our goal was to characterize and identify clinical variables that may impact swallow function components 3 weeks post-TORS.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study. Pre/postoperative use of the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP) and Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) was completed on 125 of 139 TORS patients (2016-2019) with human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) scores were retrospectively calculated. Uni/multivariate analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Dysfunctional pre-TORS DIGEST scores were predictive of post-TORS dysphagia (p = 0.015). Pre-TORS MBSImP deficits in pharyngeal stripping wave, swallow initiation, and clearing pharyngeal residue correlated with airway invasion post-TORS based on PAS scores (p = 0.012, 0.027, 0.048, respectively). Multivariate analysis of DIGEST safety scores declined with older age (p = 0.044). Odds ratios (ORs) for objective swallow function components after TORS were better for unknown primary and tonsil primaries compared to base of tongue (BOT) (OR 0.35-0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative impairments in specific MBSImP components, older patients, and BOT primaries may predict more extensive recovery in swallow function after TORS.

Oncologic and survival outcomes for resectable locally-advanced HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer treated with transoral robotic surgery

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether up-front trans-oral robotic surgery (TORS) for clinically-staged locally-advanced human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal cancer is associated with oncologic and survival outcomes comparable to early-stage (cT1/T2) tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of 628 patients with HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer who underwent up-front TORS from 2007 to 2017. Patients were stratified into two cohorts based on early-stage (cT1/2) versus locally-advanced (cT3/4) tumor at presentation.

RESULTS

We identified 589 patients who presented with early-stage tumors, and 39 patients with locally-advanced tumors. Of these, 73% of patients required adjuvant radiation, and 33% required adjuvant chemoradiation. There was no significant difference in the administration of adjuvant radiation or chemoradiation between the two cohorts. Patients in the locally-advanced disease cohort were significantly more likely to have Stage II/III disease by clinical and pathologic criteria by American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition criteria (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in 5-year overall survival (OS) or recurrence-free survival (RFS) based on Kaplan-Meier survival estimates between the two cohorts (p = 0.75, 0.6, respectively), with estimated OS of 91% at 5 years, and estimated RFS of 86% at 5 years across the study population.

CONCLUSIONS

Up-front TORS offers favorable survival outcomes for appropriately selected locally-advanced cases of HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer. Furthermore, up-front TORS is comparably effective in allowing avoidance of adjuvant therapy, particularly chemotherapy, in both cT1/T2 and locally-advanced HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer. In the absence of clear technical contraindication to surgery, cT3/T4 classification should not be considered an absolute contraindication to surgery.

Transoral robotic surgery versus nonrobotic resection of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) compared to nonrobotic surgery (NRS) on overall survival in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). We performed a retrospective study of patients with HPV+ and HPV- OPSCC undergoing TORS or NRS with neck dissection using the National Cancer Database from the years 2010-2016. Among patients with OPSCC in our cohort, 3167 (58.1%) patients underwent NRS and 2288 (41.9%) underwent TORS. TORS patients demonstrated better overall survival than NRS patients (HPV+ patients: aHR 0.74, p = 0.02; HPV- patients: aHR 0.58, p < 0.01). Subsite analysis showed TORS was correlated with improved survival in base of tongue (BoT) primaries for both HPV+ (aHR 0.46, p = 0.01) and HPV- (aHR 0.42, p = 0.01) OPSCC. Compared to NRS, TORS is associated with improved overall survival for HPV+ and HPV- OPSCC, as well as greater overall survival for BoT primaries.

Functional and oncological outcomes of salvage transoral robotic surgery: a comparative study

PURPOSE

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) as a first-line therapy has been well-documented but evidence is missing regarding salvage therapy. The aim of this study is to compare the oncological and functional outcomes of TORS as a primary and salvage therapy.

METHODS

This retrospective monocentric study included 74 patients operated by a single surgeon and sorted out into two groups: primary treatment (PT) or Salvage treatment (ST) in case of previous history of radiation therapy. Patients were further stratified by tumour location: larynx and pharynx (lST vs lPT and pST vs pPT).

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were included in PT group (64.9%) and 26 in ST group (35.1%). ST patients had more frequent cTis/T1 tumours (57.7% vs 29.2%, p = 0.0164) and no clinical lymph disease (3.8% vs 37.5%, p = 0.0016). Tracheostomy was more often performed in the ST group (57.7% vs 16.7%, p = 0.0003) and the lST subgroup (88.9% vs 9.1%, p < 0.0001). Gastric feeding tube placement was more frequent in the ST group (76.9% vs 33.3%, p = 0.0003), the pST subgroup (64.7% vs 15.4%, p = 0.0009) and the lST subgroup (100% vs 54.5%, p = 0.0297). We observed a trend for more postoperative complications in the ST group (69.2% vs 47.9%, p = 0.0783). The overall survival was lower in the ST group (p = 0.0004), and in the pST subgroup (p < 0.0001). The disease-free survival rate was lower in the ST group (p = 0.0001), the pST subgroup (p = 0.0002) and the lST subgroup (p = 0.0328).

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that survival and functional outcomes after salvage TORS are worse than in first line surgery.

Trans-oral robotic surgery: a safe and effective tool in head and neck surgery in an Australian rural setting

BACKGROUND

Trans-oral robotic surgery (TORS) facilitates surgical resection of tumours as an alternative to open surgery and has demonstrated favourable oncological results. Given the novelty of TORS and the paucity of evidence on TORS-specific complications in a rural setting, we report our experience with TORS at an Australian rural head and neck centre.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all robotic cases performed at a regional head and neck centre in Queensland was undertaken from 2014 to 2019. Patient demographics, pre-operative surgical risk, complications and outcomes such as margins and cancer recurrence were recorded. Complications were graded based on the Clavien-Dindo grading system. Descriptive statistics were used to present patient characteristics and statistical analyses were performed using Stata.

RESULTS

Forty-two TORS surgeries were performed. Twenty-one had histology confirming malignancy. There were no adverse intraoperative effects. Overall, seven patients (16.7%) had at least one complication. Four were recorded as a Clavien-Dindo 3b (post-operative bleed, wound infection and drain dislodgment). Of two cases with residual positive margins, one declined further surgery, and another received chemoradiotherapy. One patient recurred with distant metastatic disease, and another had locoregional nodal recurrence. The distribution of complications was significant across the pre-operative risk categories for both American Society of Anaesthesiologists and surgical risk score (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

TORS in a rural head and neck centre is a safe and viable treatment option for patients so long as this is undertaken with appropriate training, mentorship and teamwork.

Precision head and neck surgery: robotics and surgical vision technology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As the molecular basis of head and neck cancer becomes more clearly defined, precision medicine has gradually refined the multidisciplinary treatment paradigm for patients with oropharyngeal cancer. Although precision medicine is often thought to refer to new molecular diagnostics or unique medical therapy, the recent adoption of robotic surgery has ushered in the era of 'precision' head and neck surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Surgeons now routinely utilize a virtual reality environment to reduce the morbidity of head and neck surgical care and improve oncologic and functional outcomes. The development and subsequent FDA approval of the da Vinci SP system, a single-arm system with a flexible camera, has allowed for improved visualization and access to the deep oropharynx and larynx. Groups investigating anti-EGFR antibodies tagged with fluorescent dye as well as inherent autofluorescence differences between normal and cancerous mucosal tissues show promise for improving positive surgical margin rates.

SUMMARY

The evolution of robotics and visualization for oropharyngeal cancer represents a novel and innovative utilization of new technology to improve care. Further advancements in techniques, from refinement of the robotic platform itself, to novel real-time tumour imaging options will be critical to further advance precision care for these patients.

Patient Selection for Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: What the Surgeon Wants to Know

ABSTRACT

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is an excellent treatment strategy for well-selected patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Potential benefits of TORS are greatest among patients for whom surgical resection will reduce or eliminate the need for adjuvant therapy. Proper patient selection largely depends on imaging, which is used to determine tumor resectability, to inform expected morbidity and functional outcome, to assess the potential need for adjuvant therapy, to evaluate for vascular or other anatomic contraindications, and to gauge adequacy of transoral access to the tumor. This article provides the radiologist with a practical and accessible approach to interpreting preoperative imaging among patients with oropharyngeal cancer, emphasizing what the surgeon wants to know to inform the determination of whether the patient is a TORS candidate and why this information is important. By accurately reporting this information, the radiologist facilitates the multidisciplinary care team's selection of a treatment regimen optimized for the circumstances of the individual patient.

Determination of posterolateral oropharyngeal wall thickness and the potential implications for transoral surgical margins in tonsil cancer

BACKGROUND

Margins in transoral surgery for tonsil cancer can be limited by oropharyngeal wall thickness (OWT), but the normal range is not well established.

METHODS

In 240 noncancer subjects, OWT was measured bilaterally in the vicinity of the tonsils with MRI. Statistical analysis was performed to assess for interaction of age, sex, location, and obesity.

RESULTS

Mean(SD) OWT measured 3.4(0.6) mm posteriorly, 3.7(2.0) mm between the styloglossus and stylopharyngeus, and 5.3(0.8) mm laterally. OWT was greater in men, correlated with obesity, decreased posteriorly and laterally in the 60-80 versus 40-59 year age groups, and increased when styloglossus/stylopharyngeus were closer. OWT was <5 mm in 36.7%-97.9% of locations, with the largest percentage below this threshold located posteriorly.

CONCLUSIONS

OWT is frequently <5 mm, particularly in the posterior and intermuscular areas, suggesting that a smaller surgical margin may need to be accepted in transoral tonsil cancer surgery for anatomic reasons.

Current Advances in Robotics for Head and Neck Surgery-A Systematic Review

Background. In the past few years, surgical robots have recently entered the medical field, particularly in urology, gynecology, and general surgery. However, the clinical effectiveness and safety of robot-assisted surgery (RAS) in the field of head and neck surgery has not been clearly established. In this review, we evaluate to what extent RAS can potentially be applied in head and neck surgery, in which fields it is already daily routine and what advantages can be seen in comparison to conventional surgery. Data sources. For this purpose, we conducted a systematic review of trials published between 2000 and 2021, as well as currently ongoing trials registered in clinicaltrials.gov. The results were structured according to anatomical regions, for the topics "Costs," "current clinical trials," and "robotic research" we added separate sections for the sake of clarity. Results. Our findings show a lack of large-scale systematic randomized trials on the use of robots in head and neck surgery. Most studies include small case series or lack a control arm which enables a comparison with established standard procedures. Conclusion. The question of financial reimbursement is still not answered and the systems on the market still require some specific improvements for the use in head and neck surgery.

Machine Learning to Predict Treatment in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

This study seeks to (1) demonstrate how machine learning (ML) can be used for prediction modeling by predicting the treatment patients with T1-2, N0-N1 oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) receive and (2) assess the impact patient, socioeconomic, regional, and institutional factors have in the treatment of this population.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of adults diagnosed with T1-2, N0-N1 OPSCC from 2004 to 2013 was obtained using the National Cancer Database. The data was split into 80/20 distribution for training and testing, respectively. Various ML algorithms were explored for development. Area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, and recall were calculated for the final model.

RESULTS

Among the 19,111 patients in the study, the mean (standard deviation) age was 61.3 (10.8) years, 14,034 (73%) were male, and 17,292 (91%) were white. Surgery was the primary treatment in 9,533 (50%) cases and radiation in 9,578 (50%) cases. The model heavily utilized T-stage, primary site, N-stage, grade, and type of treatment facility to predict the primary treatment modality. The final model yielded an AUC of 78% (95% CI, 77-79%), accuracy of 71%, precision of 72%, and recall of 71%.

CONCLUSION

This study created a ML model utilizing clinical variables to predict primary treatment modality for T1-2, N0-N1 OPSCC. This study demonstrates how ML can be used for prediction modeling while also highlighting that tumor and facility realted variables impact the decision making process on a national level.

Advances in anatomical visualization on the head and neck through robotic surgery: A Brazilian perspective

Trans Oral Robotic Surgery (TORS) is an emerging technique that provides several benefits over existing treatment regimens for head and neck cancer, including smaller incisions, less bleeding, shorter term inpatient hospitalization, and reduced intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay. TORS allows a high resolution, magnified, three-dimensional wide view of the surgical field through an endoscope, avoiding large external cervical incisions and split-lip mandibulotomy, usually required in cancer surgeries of the oropharynx. The anatomy of the Oropharynx viewed from the perspective of the robotic surgeon is different from the anatomy taught in medical schools and residence/fellowship programs, which is more directly related to emergency procedures, open field surgery, and imaging exams. Developing an understanding of the anatomic relationships and landmarks from the "inside out" perspective is critical for any surgeon willing to perform surgical procedures through a transoral robotic approach. Here we address the major anatomic landmarks and structures in head and neck robotic surgeries and advantages and disadvantages of this approach. We emphasize the importance of imaging for successful outcomes, pointing out important anatomic landmarks considered as blind spots for surgeons in clinical and endoscopic evaluations. We also describe the Brazilian current scenario and future perspectives of Robotic Surgery in terms of training and access to this technique, including institutions that currently offer this service in the different regions of Brazil.

Preclinical experience with a novel single-port platform for transoral surgery

BACKGROUND

We investigated a novel minimally invasive surgical platform for use in the oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx for single-port transoral surgery used in concert with standard transoral laryngeal and pharyngeal instrumentation.

METHODS

The preclinical investigational device by Fortimedix Surgical B.V. (Netherlands) features two channels for manually controlled flexible articulating surgical instruments. A third central channel accepts both rigid and flexible endoscopes. The system is coupled to a standard laryngoscope for transoral access. In three cadaver models, we evaluated the surgical capabilities using wristed grasping instruments, microlaryngeal scissors, monopolar cautery, and a laser fiber sheath. Procedures were performed within the oropharynx, supraglottis, glottis, subglottis, and hypopharynx.

RESULTS

Within the oropharynx, we found adequate strength, range of motion, and dexterity to perform lateral oropharyngectomy and tongue base resection. Within the larynx, visualization was achieved with a variety of instruments including a flexible, 0° and 30° rigid endoscope. The glottis, supraglottis, pyriform sinuses, post-cricoid space, and esophageal inlet were readily accessible. Visualization and manipulation of grasping, laser, and monopolar cautery instruments were also possible within the subglottis. Instrument reach and accuracy facilitated completion of a delicate micro-flap on the true vocal fold. Other procedures included vocal fold resection, cricopharyngeal myotomy, and resection of subglottic mucosa.

CONCLUSIONS

From this initial proof of concept experience with this novel platform, we found a wide range of procedures within the oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx to be feasible. Further work is needed to evaluate its applicability to the clinical setting. The ability of this platform to be used with conventional instrumentation may provide an opportunity for complex transoral surgery to be performed in a facile manner at greatly reduced cost.

Treatment outcomes of transoral robotic and non-robotic surgeries to treat oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal, and supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma: A multi-center retrospective observational study in Japan

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this multicenter retrospective cohort study was to compare efficacy and subsequent postoperative treatment between transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and any non-robotic transoral surgery in Japanese patients with early oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), hypopharyngeal SCC (HPSCC), or supraglottic SCC (SGSCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical information and surgical outcomes were compared between patients with early-stage OPSCC, HPSCC, and SGSCC who underwent TORS (TORS cohort) and those who underwent non-robotic transoral surgery, including transoral videolaryngoscopic surgery (TOVS), endoscopic laryngopharyngeal surgery (ELPS), and transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) (non-robotic cohort). The data of the Head and Neck Cancer Registry of Japan (registry cohort) were used to validate the comparison. The main outcomes were the presence of positive margins under pathology and the requirement for postoperative therapy, including radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients in the TORS cohort, 236 patients in the non-robotic cohort, and 1,228 patients in the registry cohort were eligible for this study. Patients in the TORS cohort were more likely to have oropharyngeal tumor disease and T2/3 disease than those in the other cohorts (P<0.001 and P=0.052, respectively). The TORS cohort had significantly fewer patients with positive surgical margins than the non-robotic cohort (P=0.018), as well as fewer patients who underwent postoperative treatment, although the difference was not significant (P=0.069). In the subgroup analysis of patients with OPSCC, a total of 57 patients in the TORS cohort, 73 in the non-robotic cohort, and 171 in the registry cohort were eligible for the present study. Patients with OPSCC who underwent TORS were more likely to have lateral wall lesions than those in the other cohorts (P=0.003). The TORS cohort also had significantly fewer patients with positive surgical margins than the non-robotic cohort (P=0.026), and no patients in the TORS cohort underwent any postoperative treatment for OPSCC, although the difference was not significant (P=0.177).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that TORS leads to fewer positive surgical margins than non-robotic transoral surgeries. The clinical significance of TORS may be further validated through the results of all-case surveillance for patients who underwent TORS running in Japan in the future.

[Robot-assisted head and neck surgery]

Robot-assisted surgery (RAS) has already been approved for several clinical applications in head and neck surgery. In some Anglo-American regions, RAS is currently the common standard for treatment of oropharyngeal diseases. Systematic randomized studies comparing established surgical procedures with RAS in a large number of patients are unavailable so far. Experimental publications rather describe how to reach poorly accessible anatomical regions using RAS, or represent feasibility studies on the use of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) in established surgical operations. With general application of RAS in clinical practice, the question of financial reimbursement arises. Furthermore, the technical applications currently on the market still require some specific improvements for routine use in head and neck surgery.

The implementation of TORS for head and neck surgery in Thailand

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is a novel surgical treatment of head and neck cancers, mainly for limited tumor in oropharynx and supraglottis. Despite the major advantage of favorable postoperative functional outcomes, many obstacles exist during the implementation of TORS, especially in a country where financial resources are modest. We demonstrated our experience of initiating this sophisticated technology at the largest tertiary hospital in Thailand. A retrospective review study was conducted in patients with benign or malignant lesions during 2014-2020 at Siriraj Hospital. Different periods of operation time between initial and subsequent cases were compared to evaluate learning-curve improvement. A total of 36 patients underwent TORS, with median follow-up time of 18 months. The average time of room set-up, anesthesia, and positioning was 37 ± 14, 13 ± 7, and 15 ± 7 min, respectively. Whilst, the average robotic procedure time and total time in room were 44 ± 19 and 118 ± 31 min, consecutively. There was no significant difference in any time interval, except the set-up time between initial and subsequent cases. The worthwhile utilization of TORS could be administered cost-effectively despite the complicated and daunting implementation of TORS. Whilst, meticulous planning and sufficient training prior to the initiation of TORS can favorably shorten the learning curve of operative staffs in the TORS team.

How close are we to anterior robotic skull base surgery?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The application of robotic surgery to anterior skull base disease has yet to be defined despite the potential for improved tumour resection with less morbidity in this region. Complex anatomy and restricted access have limited the development of robotic anterior skull base surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

A limited number of transoral robotic surgical anterior skull base procedures have been undertaken; however, there are significant limitations to the utilization of this technology in the anterior skull base. In this article, the advantages, disadvantages and limitations of robotic anterior skull base surgery are discussed. Currently, the major limitation is the size of the robotic endoscope and of the available instrumentation. Technological advancements that provide promise for the future development of robotic anterior skull base surgery are in development, such as single-port robots, flexible instrument systems and miniaturization and growth of minimally invasive platforms.

SUMMARY

Although transnasal access to the skull base is not possible with the currently available robotic systems, promising technology does exist and is in development. Robotic anterior skull base surgery promises to provide greater access to skull base disease, improve oncologic results, reduce morbidity and to reduce the ergonomic burden on the surgeon.

Adverse event reporting in head and neck transoral robotic surgery: a MAUDE database study

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) using the da Vinci Surgical system was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2009. Currently, most available safety information on TORS procedures describes adverse events occurring in the context of clinical trials or series at high-volume academic centers. The goal of this study was to catalog reported adverse events associated with the da Vinci device in head and neck procedures by querying an FDA database. A search was performed on the MAUDE database inspecting for TORS safety incident reports generated from January 2009 through May 2020 using key words "da Vinci" and "Intuitive Surgical". A total of 3312 medical device records were produced. Of these 36 head and neck adverse events, reports were identified through manual screening of the data by the authors. Death was found to be the most common adverse event reported overall, manifesting in 44% of all reported incidents. The most frequent source of mortality was found to be hemorrhaging in the perioperative period rather than incidents of device malfunction or structural damage from surgery. This was found to be similar to the results of other published series for transoral ablative surgery. This study suggests that the small number of reported adverse events related to TORS with the da Vinci system seems to mirror what would be expected from the same procedures using other methods for transoral surgery.

Preoperative predictors of dysphagia after transoral surgery

BACKGROUND

Transoral surgery (TOS) has been used to remove pharyngeal and laryngeal cancers with the objective of improving functional without worsening survival. However, there is a risk of postoperative dysphagia, which can severely impair quality of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the preoperative predictive factors for postoperative dysphagia in patients undergoing TOS.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty patients who underwent TOS were evaluated in this study. The degree of dysphagia was evaluated using the Functional Outcome Swallowing Scale (FOSS) both preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Those whose FOSS stage was maintained postoperatively were classified into the FOSS-M group, while those with increased FOSS stage postopratively were classified into the FOSS-I group. The following parameters were assessed before surgery: age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), forced expiratory volume in 1 s, and history of head and neck radiotherapy. Videofluoroscopy (VF) was performed preoperatively to evaluate swallowing function using the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS).

RESULTS

The BMI of the FOSS-M group was significantly higher than that of the FOSS-I group. A history of radiotherapy was significantly more common in the FOSS-I group than in the FOSS-M group. Finally, preoperative PAS in the FOSS-M group was lower than that in the FOSS-I group.

CONCLUSION

This study suggested that patients with preoperative aspiration detected using VF might develop postoperative dysphagia severely. In addition, preoperative low BMI and a history of previous radiotherapy for head and neck cancer were associated with postoperative dysphagia. Objective examinations such as VF should be performed preoperatively.

Feasibility of Use of the 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging for Head and Neck Cancers in Indian Scenario: An Evaluative Study

INTRODUCTION

Inclusion of depth of invasion (DOI) and a separate classification for human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated Oropharyngeal Cancers (OPCs) are two of the many major changes in the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. After more than 2 years of implementation, the authors found the need to evaluate if the Indian clinicians found it feasible to apply the system in their practice and if the same has influenced their decision-making.

METHODS

The survey was done in the form of a questionnaire which was distributed personally and via the internet to 100 clinicians. Seventy-two clinicians responded to the questionnaire. The results were analyzed and frequency distribution was computed.

RESULTS

Eighty-three percent of the clinicians experienced that palpation of the tumour was not a reliable method to determine the DOI. The common issues stated by the clinicians were difficulty in assessing DOI in certain subsites of the oral cavity (most commonly retromolar trigone-83%), inability to determine DOI in patients with trismus, and inability to correlate pathological and clinical DOI. Thirteen percent of the clinicians did not rely on radiological tools for measuring the DOI. Seventy percent of the clinicians did not perform a P16 assay for patients with oropharyngeal cancers. Fifty percent of the clinicians preferred chemoradiotherapy for early HPV positive oropharyngeal cancers.

DISCUSSION

Based on the results of the survey, the authors recommend a need for more interpretative guidelines and methods for determining the DOI. The authors also emphasize the need for determining HPV status for all oropharyngeal carcinomas.

Transoral Robotic Surgery for Cancer of the Soft Palate Posterior Surface

The surgical treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) has undergone a considerable evolution, with, among others, transoral robotic surgery (TORS). However, TORS is rarely used for the surgery of soft palate. A 73-year-old man presented a human papilloma virus OSCC of the posterior soft palate. The tumor was resected using TORS. This report describes the surgical technique step by step of the tumor resection. The resection of early stage OSCC of the posterior surface of soft palate is possible through TORS. The procedure is noninvasive, rapid, and seems to be associated with excellent functional outcomes.

Oncologic Outcomes Following Transoral Robotic Surgery for Human Papillomavirus-Associated Oropharyngeal Carcinoma in Older Patients

Importance

While early epidemiologic studies ascribed increases in the incidence of human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancers to middle-aged patients, recent analyses have demonstrated an increasing median age of diagnosis. Treatment of patients older than 70 years is controversial as their inclusion in the practice-defining clinical trials has been limited and the survival benefit conferred by chemotherapy may be outweighed by treatment toxic effects.

Objective

To assess the oncologic outcomes of older adults with human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer who underwent upfront transoral robotic surgery and pathologic characteristics-guided adjuvant therapy in a large cohort of patients with close follow-up.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted in a tertiary care academic medical center between January 1, 2010, and December 30, 2017. Patients aged 70 years or older at time of diagnosis with biopsy-proven and surgically resectable p16-positive oropharyngeal cancers were included. Data analysis was conducted from March 1 to June 1, 2020.

Exposures

Transoral robotic surgery oropharyngeal resection and neck dissection with pathologic characteristic-guided adjuvant therapy.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Three-year estimates of disease-specific survival, overall survival, and disease-free survival, as well as rates of adjuvant therapy (radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy) and perioperative complications.

Results

Seventy-seven patients were included (median age, 73.0; interquartile range, 71.0-76.0; range, 70-89 years); of these, 58 were men (75.3%). Perioperative mortality was 1.3% and the rate of oropharyngeal hemorrhage was 2.6%. Twenty-seven patients (35.1%) underwent postoperative radiotherapy and 20 patients (26.0%) underwent postoperative chemoradiotherapy. The median length of follow-up was 39.6 (range, 0.1-96.2) months, and the 3-year estimates of survival were 92.4% (95% CI, 82.4%-96.9%) for disease-specific survival, 90.0% (95% CI, 79.4%-95.0%) for overall survival, and 84.3% (95% CI, 73.4%-91.0%) for disease-free survival.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this cohort study suggest that transoral robotic surgery and pathologic characteristic-guided adjuvant therapy can provide beneficial survival outcomes, infrequent perioperative mortality, and, for most carefully selected older adults, obviate the need for chemotherapy.

Integrated surgery and radiology: trans-oral robotic surgery guided by real-time radiologist-operated intraoral ultrasound

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and utility of intraoral ultrasound as a real-time guidance technique in trans-oral robotic surgery (TORS).

METHODS

We report our early experiences of radiologist-operated intraoral ultrasound during TORS, providing information on tumour margin and important adjacent structures. Resection specimens were sonographically imaged for margin assessment.

RESULTS

Four patients underwent ultrasound-guided TORS, with a close correlation between intraoperative and preoperative imaging in each case. The tumour was fully excised in three cases (one did not proceed due to difficult access). No ultrasound-related adverse events occurred, surgical margins were negative, and the treated patients are currently in a state of remission, with functional swallows.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative ultrasound can allow previously inaccessible disease to be robotically resected with confidence. Sonographic interrogation of the resected specimen correlated closely with histological margin analysis, and a novel technique of using saline to improve ultrasound conductance and therefore image quality is described.

De-intensification strategies in HPV-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma-a narrative review

Human papillomavirus-related (HPV+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is a relatively new clinical entity that is dramatically on the rise globally. HPV+ OPSCC is thought to be a separate clinical entity compared to HPV− OPSCC with a distinct tumor biology. Patients with HPV associated disease have been shown to have a substantially better prognosis and overall survival than those patients with the HPV negative (HPV−) counterpart. The standard of care for OPSCC is definitive radiation therapy (RT) and concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CRT), for lower and higher stage disease, respectively. However, traditional CRT is also associated with severe acute and late toxicities affecting patient quality of life, such as severe mucositis, dry mouth and dysphagia. Considering that HPV+ OPSCC is on the rise in a younger, healthier patient population and the good prognosis of HPV-related disease, there has been a focus on reducing treatment toxicities and optimizing quality of life while maintaining favorable oncologic outcomes. A variety of such de-escalation regimens are currently being explored in recently completed and ongoing clinical trials. Alterations to the standard chemotherapy, radiation and surgical regimens are being explored. This review will provide an overview of the rationale for and available results of the major de-intensification strategies in the treatment of locally advanced HPV+ OPSCC.

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Most head and neck cancers are derived from the mucosal epithelium in the oral cavity, pharynx and larynx and are known collectively as head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Oral cavity and larynx cancers are generally associated with tobacco consumption, alcohol abuse or both, whereas pharynx cancers are increasingly attributed to infection with human papillomavirus (HPV), primarily HPV-16. Thus, HNSCC can be separated into HPV-negative and HPV-positive HNSCC. Despite evidence of histological progression from cellular atypia through various degrees of dysplasia, ultimately leading to invasive HNSCC, most patients are diagnosed with late-stage HNSCC without a clinically evident antecedent pre-malignant lesion. Traditional staging of HNSCC using the tumour-node-metastasis system has been supplemented by the 2017 AJCC/UICC staging system, which incorporates additional information relevant to HPV-positive disease. Treatment is generally multimodal, consisting of surgery followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for oral cavity cancers and primary CRT for pharynx and larynx cancers. The EGFR monoclonal antibody cetuximab is generally used in combination with radiation in HPV-negative HNSCC where comorbidities prevent the use of cytotoxic chemotherapy. The FDA approved the immune checkpoint inhibitors pembrolizumab and nivolumab for treatment of recurrent or metastatic HNSCC and pembrolizumab as primary treatment for unresectable disease. Elucidation of the molecular genetic landscape of HNSCC over the past decade has revealed new opportunities for therapeutic intervention. Ongoing efforts aim to integrate our understanding of HNSCC biology and immunobiology to identify predictive biomarkers that will enable delivery of the most effective, least-toxic therapies.

Modern treatment outcomes for early T-stage oropharyngeal cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy at a tertiary care institution

Background

Transoral surgery (TOS), particularly transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has become the preferred modality in the United States for the treatment of early stage oropharyngeal cancer, largely due to assumptions of fewer toxicities and improved quality of life compared to primary radiotherapy (RT). However, these assumptions are based on retrospective analysis, a subset of which utilize primary RT groups not limited to T1-2 stage tumors for which transoral robotic surgery is FDA approved. Thus, there is potential for underestimating survival and overestimating toxicity, including treatment related mortality, in primary RT.

Methods

Consecutive cases of early T-stage (T1–T2) oropharyngeal cancer presenting to the London Health Sciences Centre between 2014 and 2018 treated with RT or chemoradiation (CRT) were reviewed. Patient demographics, treatment details, survival outcomes and toxicity were collected. Toxicities were retrospectively graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events criteria.

Results

A total of 198 patients were identified, of which 82% were male and 73% were HPV-positive. Sixty-eight percent of patients experienced a grade 2 toxicity, 48% a grade 3 and 4% a grade 4. The most frequent toxicities were dysphagia, neutropenia and ototoxicity. The rates of gastrostomy tube dependence at 1 and 2 years were 2.5% and 1% respectively. There were no grade 5 (fatal) toxicities. HPV-positive patients experienced improved 5-year overall survival (86% vs 64%, p = 0.0026).

Conclusions

Primary RT or CRT provides outstanding survival for early T-stage disease, with low rates of severe toxicity and feeding tube dependence. This study provides a reference for comparison for patients treated with primary transoral surgery.

Revisiting the Recommendation for Contralateral Tonsillectomy in HPV-Associated Tonsillar Carcinoma

Objective

Despite epidemiologic evidence that second primaries occur infrequently in HPV (human papillomavirus)–associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, recent recommendations advocate for elective contralateral palatine tonsillectomy. We aimed to study this discordance and define the necessary extent of up-front surgery in a large contemporary cohort with long-term follow-up treated with unilateral transoral robotic surgery. We hypothesized that second primaries are discovered exceedingly rarely during follow-up and that survival outcomes are not compromised with a unilateral surgical approach.

Study Design

Retrospective cohort analysis.

Setting

Tertiary care academic center between 2007 and 2017.

Methods

Records for patients with p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma of the tonsil and workup suggestive of unilateral disease who underwent ipsilateral transoral robotic surgery were analyzed for timing and distribution of locoregional recurrence, distant metastases, and second primary occurrence as well as survival characteristics.

Results

Among 295 included patients, 21 (7.1%) had a locoregional recurrence; 17 (5.8%) had a distant recurrence; and 3 (1.0%) had a second primary during a median follow-up of 48.0 months (interquartile range, 29.5-62.0). Only 1 (0.3%) had a second primary found in the contralateral tonsil. The 2- and 5-year estimates of overall survival were 95.5% (SE, 1.2%) and 90.1% (SE, 2.2%), respectively, while the 2- and 5-year estimates of disease-free survival were 90.0% (SE, 1.8%) and 84.7% (SE, 2.3%).

Conclusion

Second primary occurrence in the contralateral tonsil was infrequent, and survival outcomes were encouraging with unilateral surgery. This provides a rationale for not routinely performing elective contralateral tonsillectomy in patients whose workup suggests unilateral disease.

Intraoral midline mandibulotomy to improve access for transoral robotic surgery (TORS) base of tongue resection in a retrognathic and microstomic patient

A 74-year-old man was referred to a tertiary academic otolaryngology clinic for evaluation of a left-sided neck mass with unknown primary. Nuclear imaging modalities revealed a primary cancer located at the left tongue base. Further investigation revealed the tumour to be a p16 positive squamous cell cancer with metastatic spread to cervical lymph nodes of multiple levels. The patient was found on initial investigation to have microstomia and a retrognathic mandible, which are typically considered unsuitable for robotic surgery due to difficulties obtaining adequate exposure.The patient underwent bilateral neck dissection, followed by transoral robotic-assisted left base of tongue resection. A midline intraoral mandibulotomy was performed to improve robotic access. Following tumour resection, the mandible was repaired using open reduction with internal plate fixation. Postoperative occlusion was maintained, and the patient recovered well from mandibulotomy with none of the morbidity or cosmetic defects associated with a traditional lip-split approach.

Transcervical arterial ligation for prevention of postoperative hemorrhage in transoral oropharyngectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Transcervical arterial ligation has been studied as a useful procedure to prevent bleeding events after transoral robotic surgery (TORS).

METHODS

A systematic review of English-language literature on arterial ligation in TORS from 2005 to 2019 was conducted using Cochrane, PubMed, Web of Science (WoS), and ScienceDirect databases. Studies evaluating ligation and rates of postoperative hemorrhage were included. Meta-analysis of included studies was performed to assess impact of ligation on postoperative hemorrhage.

RESULTS

Five studies with 2008 patients were included. History of radiation (odds ratio [OR] = 2.26, P = .02) and advanced tumor stage (OR = 1.93, P = .02) were found to predispose patients to postoperative hemorrhage. Arterial ligation was protective against severe hemorrhage in the mixed primary surgical modality cohort (OR = 0.33, P = .03) and in the TORS-only subgroup (OR = 0.21, P = .02), but did not significantly impact overall odds of postoperative hemorrhage.

CONCLUSION

Transcervical arterial ligation offers protection against major/severe postoperative hemorrhage in patients undergoing TORS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.