Impact of pretransplant diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma on cadveric liver allocation in the era of MELD

Recent advances in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

In the last decade, new imaging techniques have become available, offering the possibility of investigating contrast perfusion of liver nodules in cirrhosis. It is now accepted that a non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be established based on the vascular pattern, obtained with pure blood pool contrast agents. The diagnostic pattern includes: hypervascularity in the arterial phase (15-35 s after contrast injection), consisting in a contrast signal in the nodule greater than in the surrounding parenchyma, followed by contrast wash out, which leads the nodule to show the same, or, more specifically, a lower contrast signal, than the surrounding parenchyma in the portal and late phases (>40 s after injection). Such a pattern can be obtained not only by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, but also by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, most simply with real-time low mechanical index harmonic imaging ultrasound equipment with second-generation ultrasound contrast agents. The risk of false-positive diagnosis of malignancy isnearly abolished when the functional vascular pattern is not the only feature, but is superimposed on a nodule visible also without contrast. One single contrast imaging technique may suffice to make a diagnosis of HCC if the nodule is >1 cm in diameter and has developed during a surveillance program. Other types of contrast agents, such as those taken up by the reticular-endothelial system cells, may offer additional diagnostic clues, but definitive evidence of their efficacy is still to be produced. In conclusion, contrast-enhanced imaging techniques now offer the possibility of a non-invasive diagnosis of HCC in a large number of cases, reducing the need of invasive investigations, such as ultrasound-guided biopsy or angiography.

An analysis of the UNOS liver transplant registry: high serum alpha-fetoprotein does not justify an increase in MELD points for suspected hepatocellular carcinoma

The current United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) criteria for liver transplantation gives priority to patients with elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP; > or = 500 ng/mL) in the absence of radiologic evidence of a hepatic mass. Reports have shown that an elevated serum AFP is a poor diagnostic indicator for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis. Our aim was to determine if an AFP level above 500 ng/mL, in the absence of a liver mass by imaging study, correlates with the presence of HCC. Using the UNOS database we identified all patients transplanted for HCC in the United States between February 2002 and October 2005 based on these criteria. The data collected included: patient demographics, clinical information, and pathological outcomes. The data was analyzed using a chi-squared t-test and confirmed by logistic regression modeling. A total of 22 patients received a cadaveric liver transplant, while 1 received a living donor transplant during the study period. HCC was confirmed posttransplantation in only 6 patients (26%). There was no difference in race, gender, etiology of liver disease, or AFP level between patients with and without HCC but a significant difference in age (59.8 yr for HCC patients vs. 51.3 yr for the non-HCC group; P = 0.01). In conclusion, the majority of the patients who received extra Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) points based on an elevated AFP did not have HCC. Older age was a significant predictor for the presence of HCC in patients with a serum AFP greater than 500 ng/mL. These results demonstrate the poor correlation of serum AFP with the presence of HCC in patients awaiting liver transplantation.

Applicability of the Milan Criteria for Determining Liver Transplantation as a First-Line Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

To determine whether or not the Milan criteria (MC) should be used to determine the applicability of liver transplantation (LT) as a first-line treatment for patients with cirrhosis with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are able to endure hepatectomy.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 82 patients with cirrhosis with HCC who were treated by hepatectomy without LT at our institution between 1990 and 2003.

RESULTS

Of these 82 patients, 48 met the MC. Proportional hazard regression analyses to determine the independent prognostic factors for postoperative cumulative patient and disease-free survival showed that meeting the MC is the strongest prognostic factor for both patient and disease-free survival. The cumulative patient and disease-free survival rates were 76.7% and 28.9%, respectively, at 5 years in patients who met the MC. The cumulative disease-free survival was markedly inferior to those in previously reported series of LT for HCC who met the MC, but the cumulative patient survival was comparable to those in the previously reported series. A comparison of cumulative postoperative survival between patients who met the MC and fulfilled all five factors listed below and patients who met the MC but did not fulfill any of the five factors demonstrated that the latter patients showed statistically significantly worse postoperative patient survival than the former. The five factors included: Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score < 10, indocyanine green retention rate at 15 minutes < 20%, absence of microscopic fibrous capsular invasion and microscopic intrahepatic metastases, and earlier grade (T1 or T2) of American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor classification.

CONCLUSIONS

The MC should not be used to determine the applicability of LT as a first-line treatment for patients with HCC considered able to endure hepatectomy. However, modifying MC with some clinicopathological factors could satisfy the appropriate criteria for applying LT as a first-line treatment for these patients.

Reduced priority MELD score for hepatocellular carcinoma does not adversely impact candidate survival awaiting liver transplantation

The liver organ allocation policy of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) is based on the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD). The policy provides additional priority for candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are awaiting deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). However, this priority was reduced on February 27, 2003 to a MELD of 20 for stage T1 and of 24 for stage T2 HCC. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of reduced priority on HCC candidate survival while on the waiting list. The UNOS database was reviewed for all HCC candidates listed after February 27, 2002, The HCC candidates were grouped into two time periods: MELD 1 (listed between February 27, 2002, and February 26, 2003) and MELD 2 (listed between February 27, 2003 and February 26, 2004). For the two time periods, the national DDLT incidence rates for HCC patients were 1.44 versus 1.53 DDLT per person-year (p = NS) and the waiting times were similar for the two periods (138.0 +/- 196.8 vs. 129.0 +/- 133.8 days; p = NS). Furthermore, the 3-, 6- and 12-month candidate, patient survival and dropout rates were also similar nationally. Regional differences in rates of DDLT for HCC were observed during both MELD periods. Consequently, the reduced MELD score for stage T1 and T2 HCC candidates awaiting DDLT has not had an impact nationally either on their survival on the waiting list or on their ability to obtain a liver transplant within a reasonable time frame. However, regional variations point to the need for reform in how organs are allocated for HCC at the regional level.

Impact of model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scoring system on pathological findings at and after liver transplantation

The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scoring system, a validated objective liver disease severity scale, was adopted in February 2002 to allocate cadaveric organs for liver transplantation (LT). To improve transplantability before succumbing to advanced disease, patients with low-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are given extra points in this system commensurate with their predicted mortality. Our aims were to determine 1) any change in the pathological findings at LT following the implementation of this system and 2) the impact of scoring advantage given to early-stage HCC. Clinicopathologic findings were compared before (pre-MELD, n = 87) and after (MELD, n = 58) the introduction of the MELD system. The findings in the pre-MELD vs. MELD groups were as follows: HCC, 27.5% vs. 48.3% (P = 0.001); portal vein thrombosis (PVT), 13.7% vs. 25.9% (P = 0.08); cholestasis, 16.1% vs. 32.7% (P = 0.026); inflammation grade of 2 or more, 43.7% vs. 48.3% (P = not significant); hepatitis C (HCV), 45.9% vs. 51.7% (P = not significant); HCV with lymphoid aggregates, 25% vs. 60% (P = 0.003); HCV with hyperplastic hilar nodes, 15.0% vs. 36.6% (P = 0.001); and post-LT HCC recurrence, 4.1% vs. 3.4% (P = not significant). Non-HCC-related findings were further compared in the 2 subgroups of pre-MELD (n = 57) and MELD (n = 31) after exclusion of HCC and fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) cases, and only cholestasis was significantly increased in the subgroup MELD. In conclusion, increased incidence of native liver cholestasis in the MELD era may be the histologic correlate of clinically severe liver disease. The scoring advantage given to low-stage HCC did result in a significantly increased incidence of HCC in the MELD group, but it did not adversely affect the post-LT recurrence rate.

Liver transplantation in the MELD era: a single-center experience

Model for Endstage Liver Disease (MELD) score has been used to allocate organs since February 2002. This policy allocates organs to candidates with regard to severity of their underlying liver disease except in the case of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of MELD on waiting times, dropout rates, and transplantation rates in all patients awaiting liver transplantation at our center. The records of all patients listed for liver transplantation between May 28, 1999, and February 27, 2004, at the Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, were reviewed. Candidates were grouped by two time periods as pre-MELD or post-MELD based on date of MELD implementation (February 27, 2002). The incidence of deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT), waiting time to DDLT, dropout rate from the waiting list because of clinical deterioration or death, and survival while waiting for or after DDLT were determined for each group. Three hundred fifty-one patients were listed for liver transplantation (195 pre-MELD, 156 post-MELD) during the study period. HCC patients had an improved rate of transplantation after MELD (pre-MELD, 1.39 persons per year; post-MELD, 3.48 persons per year). In all groups, with the exception of hepatitis C virus, the transplantation rates were the same for both categories. The hepatitis C virus group also had improved transplantation rates in the post-MELD period. HCC candidates under the new allocation policy have an increased incidence of DDLT in our institution. However, this has not disadvantaged patients with non-HCC diagnoses. Thus, the new MELD-based allocation policy has benefited all candidates by allowing more timely transplants.

Liver allocation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a European Center policy in the pre-MELD era

BACKGROUND

Policies to decrease dropout during waiting time for liver transplantation (LT) are under debate.

METHODS

We evaluated the allocation system from 1996 to 2003, when recipients had priority related to Child-Pugh score and donors >60 years were mainly offered to recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The outcomes of 656 patients with chronic liver disease (142 HCC and 514 non-HCC) listed for LT were prospectively evaluated, considering recipient and donor features.

RESULTS

Transplantation and dropout rates were similar between HCC and non-HCC patients: 64.1% vs. 70.6% and 26% vs. 22.6%. Multivariate analysis showed the probability of being transplanted within 3 months was related to Child-Pugh score >10 and to HCC, whereas the probability of being removed from the list within 3 months was only related to Child-Pugh score >10. HCC patients had a lower median waiting time (97 vs. 197 days, P<0.001), a higher rate of donors > 60 years (50.5% vs. 33.5%, P<0.005) and with steatosis (31.6% vs. 14.3%, P<0.01), but a lower Child-Pugh score (9.1+/-2.1 vs. 9.6+/-1.7, P<0.05) than non-HCC patients. The 5-year patient survival was comparable since registration on the list and since LT: 56.9% and 77% in the HCC group vs. 61.4% and 79% in the non-HCC patients. Donors > 60 years affected outcome after LT in the non-HCC group, but not in the HCC patients.

CONCLUSION

By allocating donors >60 years mainly to HCC patients, we controlled dropout without affecting their survival and the outcome of non-HCC patients.

Accuracy of ultrasonography, spiral CT, magnetic resonance, and alpha-fetoprotein in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review

BACKGROUND AND AIM

In patients with chronic liver disease, the accuracy of ultrasound scan (US), spiral computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has never been systematically assessed, and present systematic review was aimed at this issue.

METHODS

Pertinent cross-sectional studies having as a reference standard pathological examinations of the explanted liver or resected segment(s), biopsies of focal lesion(s), and/or a period of follow-up, were identified using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and CancerLit. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios (LR) were calculated using the random effect model. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve and predefined subgroup analyses were made when indicated.

RESULTS

The pooled estimates of the 14 US studies were 60% (95% CI 44-76) for sensitivity, 97% (95% CI 95-98) for specificity, 18 (95% CI 8-37) for LR+, and 0.5 (95% CI 0.4-0.6) for LR-; for the 10 CT studies sensitivity was 68% (95% CI 55-80), specificity 93% (95% CI 89-96), LR+ 6 (95% CI 3-12),and LR- 0.4 (95% CI 0.3-0.6); for the nine MRI studies sensitivity was 81% (95% CI 70-91), specificity 85% (95%CI 77-93), LR+ 3.9 (95%CI 2-7), and LR- 0.3 (95% CI 0.2-0.5). The sensitivity and specificity of AFP varied widely, and this could not be entirely attributed to the threshold effect of the different cutoff levels used.

CONCLUSIONS

US is highly specific but insufficiently sensitive to detect HCC in many cirrhotics or to support an effective surveillance program. The operative characteristics of CT are comparable, whereas MRI is more sensitive. High-quality prospective studies are needed to define the actual diagnostic role of AFP.

Comparison of liver biopsy and noninvasive methods for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Current management guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) do not require biopsy to prove the diagnosis. We evaluated our experience of patients with liver disease and hepatic lesions suspicious for HCC who underwent both fine-needle aspiration and core biopsy and correlated the results with those from commonly used noninvasive approaches.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of a series of patients undergoing biopsy because of a suspicion of HCC and compared sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of biopsy with existing noninvasive methods for diagnosing HCC.

RESULTS

HCC was diagnosed by biopsy in 74 (63%) of 118 cases, and an additional 10 were found to have HCC on follow-up. Patients with positive biopsy results had significantly higher serum alpha-fetoprotein levels (median, 57 vs 12; P = .014) than those with negative biopsies, although these 2 groups were otherwise similar with regard to tests of liver function, lesion size on imaging, and Child-Pugh class. No patient developed evidence of tumor spread along the needle track after biopsy. We compared the diagnosis of HCC by biopsy with noninvasive diagnostic criteria advocated by the European Association for the Study of the Liver and those used by the United Network for Organ Sharing. Compared with criteria of the European Association for the Study of the Liver and the United Network for Organ Sharing, biopsy had greater sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend a greater role for image-guided biopsy of lesions greater than 1 cm clinically suspicious for HCC to allow adequate treatment planning because the risks of biopsy appear small and the potential benefits significant. Obtaining material for both cytologic and histologic examination at biopsy maximizes the diagnostic yield.

Characterization of small nodules in cirrhosis by assessment of vascularity: the problem of hypovascular hepatocellular carcinoma

In a prospective study, we examined the impact of arterial hypervascularity, as established by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) recommendations, as a criterion for characterizing small (1-3 cm) nodules in cirrhosis. A total of 72 nodules (1-2 cm, n = 41; 2.1-3 cm, n = 31) detected by ultrasonography in 59 patients with cirrhosis were included in the study. When coincidental arterial hypervascularity was detected at contrast perfusional ultrasonography and helical computed tomography, the lesion was considered to be hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) according to EASL criteria. When one or both techniques showed negative results, ultrasound-guided biopsy was performed. In cases with negative results for malignancy or high-grade dysplasia, biopsy was repeated when an increase in size was detected at the 3-month follow-up examination. Coincidental hypervascularity was found in 44 of 72 nodules (61%; 44% of 1-2-cm nodules and 84% of 2-3-cm nodules). Fourteen nodules (19.4%) had negative results with both techniques (hypovascular nodules). Biopsy showed HCC in 5 hypovascular nodules and in 11 of 14 nodules with hypervascularity using only one technique. All nodules larger than 2 cm finally resulted to be HCC. Not satisfying the EASL imaging criteria for diagnosis were 38% of HCCs 1 to 2 cm (17% hypovascular) and 16% of those 2 to 3 cm (none hypovascular). In conclusion, the noninvasive EASL criteria for diagnosis of HCC are satisfied in only 61% of small nodules in cirrhosis; thus, biopsy frequently is required in this setting. Relying on imaging techniques in nodules of 1 to 2 cm would miss the diagnosis of HCC in up to 38% of cases. Any nodule larger than 2 cm should be regarded as highly suspicious for HCC.

Liver transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Liver transplantation continues to change as we further define appropriate criteria for allocation and utilization of this scarce resource. The following review highlights new trends and ideas in this evolving field.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although the model for end-stage renal disease (MELD) scoring system appears to fairly accurately predict mortality while waiting for transplant, the system may be less accurate in predicting outcomes following transplantation. MELD scores offer an additional advantage to patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), bringing them to transplant sooner with overall better survivals. However, despite its advantages, the MELD scoring system does not resolve the disparity in the allocation of organs between various organ procurement organizations. Several variables appear to affect patients with hepatitis C undergoing liver transplantation. Selection of appropriate donors appears to be important when transplanting patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection as increasing donor age is associated with poorer outcomes. However, the controversy over whether a living donor liver transplant (LDLT) results in poorer outcomes in HCV infected patients remains. Post-transplant medical treatment of HCV may result in both a sustained virologic response and improved histology. With improved overall survival in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplant (OLT), increasing attention has been focused on the medical complications following transplant. Identifying specific contributing factors in the development of renal dysfunction and devising strategies to prevent its occurrence are critical to further improvements in outcome following OLT.

SUMMARY

As the gap between patients and available organs remains, continued investigation into appropriate allocation and maximization of outcomes following liver transplant will continue.

Hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is expected to continue to increase over the next two decades. The risk factors for the development of HCC are unknown and there is a lack of standardization of the diagnostic criteria for HCC. Our aim is to review the latest information regarding the risk factors, surveillance and diagnosis of this tumor.

RECENT FINDINGS

Alcohol, tobacco, obesity, diabetes and viral etiology interact together to increase the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis, which may allow us to identify a high-risk group for HCC among patients with cirrhosis. Several studies showed that surveillance of cirrhotic patients is cost-effective and leads to an overall improvement in survival. This year a study from the United Network of Organ Sharing in the United States indicated that 30% of patients were understaged by imaging pre-transplant and 31% of patients with a diagnosis of stage 1 HCC (single lesion < 2 cm in diameter) did not have a tumor on the explant examination. Another study showed that washout of arterially enhancing lesions is very sensitive and specific for a diagnosis of HCC.

SUMMARY

Not all patients with cirrhosis have an equal risk for developing hepatocellular carcinoma. Therefore, further studies should stratify the risk of HCC so surveillance is tailored to those at the highest risk. Standardization of the diagnostic criteria of HCC is critically important for better patient care and future research. Washout of arterially enhancing lesions should be important criteria of HCC.

The progression of hepatitis B- and C-infections to chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma: presentation, diagnosis, screening, prevention, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Much information has been gained in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC during the last 15 years. Ever improving imaging technology has made nonhistologic diagnostic criteria possible, albeit controversial. Liver transplantation, resection, and RFA are considered curative options. Yet, HCC incidence is steadily rising because of limited progress on disease prevention. Accurate and cost-effective screening is necessary. Presently, only 10% to 15% of HCC patients present with a curative stage of disease. Because the field of HCC is rapidly changing, patients with HCC should be referred to liver centers with a full array of services, from surgical to oncologic. The prognosis for HCC patients will surely improve with a multi-disciplinary approach to care and further clinical research. Better screening and prevention of recurrence should eventually improve survival. It is hoped that antiviral treatment studies will lower the risk of HCC, and that these changes will occur soon enough to help the many patients at risk for or diagnosed with HCC over the next several years.

Improving the prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients with an arterially-enhancing liver mass

In the United States, cirrhotic patients with known or suspected hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are prioritized for liver transplantation. Noninvasive criteria for the diagnosis of HCC rely on arterial enhancement of a mass. The aim of this study was to determine whether clinical, laboratory, and / or radiologic data can improve the prediction of HCC in cirrhotic patients with an arterially-enhancing mass. Between May 2002 and June 2003, dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of consecutive patients with liver cirrhosis and a solid mass were reviewed by 2 radiologists blinded to the clinical diagnosis. Clinical, laboratory, and radiologic data were recorded for all patients. A total of 94 patients with cirrhosis and an arterially-enhancing liver mass were studied, 66 (70%) of whom had HCC. Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) >20 ng/mL (P = .029), tumor size >2 cm (P = .0018), and delayed hypointensity (P = .0001) were independent predictors of HCC. Delayed hypointensity of an arterially-enhancing mass had a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 96% for HCC. The presence of delayed hypointensity was the only independent predictor of HCC among patients with arterially-enhancing lesions <2 cm (odds ratio, 6.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-13), with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 95%. In conclusion, delayed hypointensity of an arterially-enhancing mass was the strongest independent predictor of HCC, regardless of the size of the lesion. If additional studies confirm our results, the noninvasive criteria utilized to make a diagnosis of HCC should be revised.

Preneoplastic lesions in human hepatocarcinogenesis

The early stages of hepatocarcinogenesis in human chronic liver diseases are characterized by the emergence of preneoplastic lesions of which some will eventually develop into hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Basic studies on the genetic and epigenetic alterations of these preneoplastic lesions may eventually lead to new therapeutic strategies. Clinicopathological studies are also important in order to determine optimal management of patients with a preneoplastic lesion. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of the current concepts of preneoplastic lesion in chronic liver diseases. The microscopical small-cell dysplastic focus is the smallest morphologically recognizable precursor lesion of HCC and therefore is a logical target of study to elucidate the earliest events in hepatocarcinogenesis. In contrast, large-cell dysplasia is not a precursor lesion, but appears to be of clinical value because of its good predictive value for development of HCC. Dysplastic nodules (DNs) are macroscopically recognizable precursor lesions of HCC and high-grade DNs (HGDNs) have a risk of malignant transformation. Detection of DNs and correct differentiation from small HCC (<2 cm) is sometimes difficult, especially when only imaging techniques are used. Additional clinicopathological studies on identification and optimal treatment of DNs are necessary. Molecular studies on HGDNs and small HCCs may yield much information on the genetic mechanisms involved in the transition from severe dysplasia to early malignancy. In contrast, currently available data indicate that (large) regenerative nodules do not represent a distinct step in hepatocarcinogenesis. Animal models will be helpful in the further unravelling of human HCC development, provided that studies are performed on models that are good representatives of human hepatocarcinogenesis. We propose three criteria by which good mimickers can be identified.

Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is responsible for a large proportion of cancer deaths worldwide. HCC is frequently diagnosed after the development of clinical deterioration at which time survival is measured in months. Long-term survival requires detection of small tumors, often present in asymptomatic individuals, which may be more amenable to invasive therapeutic options. Surveillance of high-risk individuals for HCC is commonly performed using the serum marker alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) often in combination with ultrasonography. Various other serologic markers are currently being tested to help improve surveillance accuracy. Diagnosis of HCC often requires more sophisticated imaging modalities such as CT scan and MRI, which have multiphasic contrast enhancement capabilities. Serum AFP used alone can be helpful if levels are markedly elevated, which occurs in fewer than half of cases at time of diagnosis. Confirmation by liver biopsy can be performed under circumstances when the diagnosis of HCC remains unclear.

Cost-effectiveness of hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in patients with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

HCV-related cirrhosis is a leading risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Surveillance might detect HCC at a treatable stage. We estimated the clinical and economic consequences of a common HCC surveillance strategy in patients with HCV-related cirrhosis in the context of alternative HCC treatment strategies.

METHODS

With a Markov model, we examined surveillance with serum alpha-fetoprotein and ultrasound every 6 months in patients with compensated HCV-related cirrhosis from age 45-70 years or death, and HCC treatment with resection, cadaveric liver transplantation (CLT), or living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

RESULTS

Compared to natural history in the base case, surveillance with resection, listing for CLT, or LDLT increased life expectancy by 0.49, 2.58, and 3.81 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), respectively, all at costs less than 51,000 US dollars/QALY gained. The consequences of surveillance were most sensitive to the outcomes and costs of HCC treatments but not surveillance test performance characteristics or cost. Prioritizing CLT for patients with HCC over those with decompensated cirrhosis resulted in greater overall life expectancy with minimal increase in cost.

CONCLUSIONS

Surveillance for HCC in patients with compensated HCV-related cirrhosis might gain QALYs at acceptable costs. The impact of surveillance depends most on the outcomes and costs of HCC treatments, rather than surveillance test characteristics. By increasing organ availability for timely definitive treatment, LDLT might achieve the greatest gain in life expectancy at acceptable costs. Prioritizing CLT for HCC might increase the population-wide benefits of CLT.

Living donor liver transplantation for adult patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: experience in Japan

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the outcome of living donor liver transplantation (LDLTx) in 316 adult patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

LDLTx has increasingly been performed worldwide, but the impact of the procedure on HCC has not been evaluated in a large series.

METHODS

Between October 1989 and December 2003, 1389 adults underwent LDLTx at 49 centers in Japan. In 316 (22.8%) who received LDLTx for HCC (70 females, 22%, median age 57 years; and 246 males, 88%, median age, 54 years), we analyzed pretransplant clinical status, imaging diagnosis, transplant procedure, pathologic study of explanted liver, and outcome. In 232 patients (73.4%), various surgical and nonsurgical therapies had been employed prior to LDLTx. The median follow-up period was 16 months (range, 2.5-72.0)

RESULTS

Currently, 236 (74.7%) of the patients are living. One- and 3-year patient survivals were 78.1% and 69.0%, respectively. Model end-stage liver disease score and preoperative serum alpha-fetoprotein level were independent risk factors for patient survival. Forty patients (12.7%) developed HCC recurrence. Alpha-fetoprotein level, tumor size, vascular invasion, and bilobar distribution were independent risk factors for HCC recurrence. Grade of histologic differentiation of HCC showed close correlation with tumor characteristics and recurrence. One- and 3-year recurrence-free survivals were 72.7% and 64.7%, respectively. When the Milan criteria were applied, patient survival and disease-free survival at 3 years were 78.7% and 79.1%, respectively, in patients who met the criteria, and 60.4% and 52.6%, respectively, in those who did not.

CONCLUSION

LDLTx can achieve acceptable survival in HCC patients, even when liver function is markedly impaired, or HCC is uncontrollable by conventional antitumor treatments.

Living donor liver transplantation for adult patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: experience in Japan

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the outcome of living donor liver transplantation (LDLTx) in 316 adult patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

LDLTx has increasingly been performed worldwide, but the impact of the procedure on HCC has not been evaluated in a large series.

METHODS

Between October 1989 and December 2003, 1389 adults underwent LDLTx at 49 centers in Japan. In 316 (22.8%) who received LDLTx for HCC (70 females, 22%, median age 57 years; and 246 males, 88%, median age, 54 years), we analyzed pretransplant clinical status, imaging diagnosis, transplant procedure, pathologic study of explanted liver, and outcome. In 232 patients (73.4%), various surgical and nonsurgical therapies had been employed prior to LDLTx. The median follow-up period was 16 months (range, 2.5-72.0)

RESULTS

Currently, 236 (74.7%) of the patients are living. One- and 3-year patient survivals were 78.1% and 69.0%, respectively. Model end-stage liver disease score and preoperative serum alpha-fetoprotein level were independent risk factors for patient survival. Forty patients (12.7%) developed HCC recurrence. Alpha-fetoprotein level, tumor size, vascular invasion, and bilobar distribution were independent risk factors for HCC recurrence. Grade of histologic differentiation of HCC showed close correlation with tumor characteristics and recurrence. One- and 3-year recurrence-free survivals were 72.7% and 64.7%, respectively. When the Milan criteria were applied, patient survival and disease-free survival at 3 years were 78.7% and 79.1%, respectively, in patients who met the criteria, and 60.4% and 52.6%, respectively, in those who did not.

CONCLUSION

LDLTx can achieve acceptable survival in HCC patients, even when liver function is markedly impaired, or HCC is uncontrollable by conventional antitumor treatments.