Association between textural and morphological tumor indices on baseline PET-CT and early metabolic response on interim PET-CT in bulky malignant lymphomas

Diagnostic and prognostic value of amyloid PET textural and shape features: comparison with classical semi-quantitative rating in 760 patients from the ADNI-2 database

We evaluated the performance of amyloid PET textural and shape features in discriminating normal and Alzheimer's disease (AD) subjects, and in predicting conversion to AD in subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or significant memory concern (SMC). Subjects from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative with available baseline ¹⁸F-florbetapir and T1-MRI scans were included. The cross-sectional cohort consisted of 181 controls and 148 AD subjects. The longitudinal cohort consisted of 431 SMC/MCI subjects, 85 of whom converted to AD during follow-up. PET images were normalized to MNI space and post-processed using in-house software. Relative retention indices (SUVr) were computed with respect to pontine, cerebellar, and composite reference regions. Several textural and shape features were extracted then combined using a support vector machine (SVM) to build a predictive model of AD conversion. Diagnostic and prognostic performance was evaluated using ROC analysis and survival analysis with the Cox proportional hazard model. The three SUVr and all the tested features effectively discriminated AD subjects in cross-sectional analysis (all p < 0.001). In longitudinal analysis, the variables with the highest prognostic value were composite SUVr (AUC 0.86; accuracy 81%), skewness (0.87; 83%), local minima (0.85; 79%), Geary's index (0.86; 81%), gradient norm maximal argument (0.83; 82%), and the SVM model (0.91; 86%). The adjusted hazard ratio for AD conversion was 5.5 for the SVM model, compared with 4.0, 2.6, and 3.8 for cerebellar, pontine and composite SUVr (all p < 0.001), indicating that appropriate amyloid textural and shape features predict conversion to AD with at least as good accuracy as classical SUVr.

A Postreconstruction Harmonization Method for Multicenter Radiomic Studies in PET

Several reports have shown that radiomic features are affected by acquisition and reconstruction parameters, thus hampering multicenter studies. We propose a method that, by removing the center effect while preserving patient-specific effects, standardizes features measured from PET images obtained using different imaging protocols. Methods: Pretreatment ¹⁸F-FDG PET images of patients with breast cancer were included. In one nuclear medicine department (department A), 63 patients were scanned on a time-of-flight PET/CT scanner, and 16 lesions were triple-negative (TN). In another nuclear medicine department (department B), 74 patients underwent PET/CT on a different brand of scanner and a different reconstruction protocol, and 15 lesions were TN. The images from department A were smoothed using a gaussian filter to mimic data from a third department (department A-S). The primary lesion was segmented to obtain a lesion volume of interest (VOI), and a spheric VOI was set in healthy liver tissue. Three SUVs and 6 textural features were computed in all VOIs. A harmonization method initially described for genomic data was used to estimate the department effect based on the observed feature values. Feature distributions in each department were compared before and after harmonization. Results: In healthy liver tissue, the distributions significantly differed for 4 of 9 features between departments A and B and for 6 of 9 between departments A and A-S (P < 0.05, Wilcoxon test). After harmonization, none of the 9 feature distributions significantly differed between 2 departments (P > 0.1). The same trend was observed in lesions, with a realignment of feature distributions between the departments after harmonization. Identification of TN lesions was largely enhanced after harmonization when the cutoffs were determined on data from one department and applied to data from the other department. Conclusion: The proposed harmonization method is efficient at removing the multicenter effect for textural features and SUVs. The method is easy to use, retains biologic variations not related to a center effect, and does not require any feature recalculation. Such harmonization allows for multicenter studies and for external validation of radiomic models or cutoffs and should facilitate the use of radiomic models in clinical practice.

Tumour functional sphericity from PET images: prognostic value in NSCLC and impact of delineation method

PURPOSE

Sphericity has been proposed as a parameter for characterizing PET tumour volumes, with complementary prognostic value with respect to SUV and volume in both head and neck cancer and lung cancer. The objective of the present study was to investigate its dependency on tumour delineation and the resulting impact on its prognostic value.

METHODS

Five segmentation methods were considered: two thresholds (40% and 50% of SUV_max), ant colony optimization, fuzzy locally adaptive Bayesian (FLAB), and gradient-aided region-based active contour. The accuracy of each method in extracting sphericity was evaluated using a dataset of 176 simulated, phantom and clinical PET images of tumours with associated ground truth. The prognostic value of sphericity and its complementary value with respect to volume for each segmentation method was evaluated in a cohort of 87 patients with stage II/III lung cancer.

RESULTS

Volume and associated sphericity values were dependent on the segmentation method. The correlation between segmentation accuracy and sphericity error was moderate (|ρ| from 0.24 to 0.57). The accuracy in measuring sphericity was not dependent on volume (|ρ| < 0.4). In the patients with lung cancer, sphericity had prognostic value, although lower than that of volume, except for that derived using FLAB for which when combined with volume showed a small improvement over volume alone (hazard ratio 2.67, compared with 2.5). Substantial differences in patient prognosis stratification were observed depending on the segmentation method used.

CONCLUSION

Tumour functional sphericity was found to be dependent on the segmentation method, although the accuracy in retrieving the true sphericity was not dependent on tumour volume. In addition, even accurate segmentation can lead to an inaccurate sphericity value, and vice versa. Sphericity had similar or lower prognostic value than volume alone in the patients with lung cancer, except when determined using the FLAB method for which there was a small improvement in stratification when the parameters were combined.