Treatment of osteosarcoma with ifosfamide: comparison of response in pediatric patients with recurrent disease versus patients previously untreated: a Pediatric Oncology Group study

Adjuvant therapy of osteosarcoma?A Phase II trial

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to estimate the time to treatment failure and survival rate of the three-drug combination of doxorubicin, cisplatin, and ifosfamide as primary and postoperative, adjunctive treatment for teenagers and adults with osteosarcoma (OS).

METHODS

Sixty-three eligible patients with nonmetastatic OS of the extremities were registered from 24 institutions from February, 1992 through December, 1996. Chemotherapy was comprised of doxorubicin at a dose of 75 mg/m2 and cisplatin at a dose of 120 mg/m2, alternating with doxorubicin at a dose of 50 mg/m2 and ifosfamide at a dose of 8 g/m2. Four cycles were given prior to surgical resection, and four cycles were given after surgery. Outcome measures included the time to treatment failure, overall survival, toxicity, and centralized assessment of tumor necrosis.

RESULTS

Thirty-one of 63 eligible patients died, for a 5-year overall survival rate of 58% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 46-71%). The median time to treatment failure was 19 months (95% CI, 12-41 months). A good pathologic response (> or = 90% necrosis) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was observed in 48% of patients who underwent surgery. There was no correlation noted between response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and patient outcome. Grade 4 hematologic toxicities were frequent (89%), although serious nonhematologic toxicities other than nausea and emesis were uncommon.

CONCLUSIONS

The regimen and schedule used in the current study did not improve outcomes compared with prior trials of doxorubicin and cisplatin alone. New, more effective drugs are needed for the treatment of patients with OS. The identification and utilization of molecular markers to predict outcome and response to therapy would facilitate clinical management, limiting exposure to toxic therapies for patients with favorable molecular profiles and identifying those patients who may fail with current approaches as candidates for clinical trials.

Human osteosarcoma xenografts and their sensitivity to chemotherapy

Despite the increased survival rates of osteosarcoma patients attributed to adjuvant chemotherapy, at least one third of the patients still die due to their disease. Further improvements in the management of osteosarcoma may rely on a more individualised treatment strategy, as well as on the introduction of new drugs. To aid in the preclinical evaluation of new candidate substances against osteosarcoma, we have established 11 human osteosarcoma xenograft lines and characterised them with regard to response to five different reference drugs. Doxorubicin, cisplatin methotrexate, ifosfamide and lomustine were effective in 3/11, 3/11, 1/10, 5/11 and 4/11 of the xenografts, respectively. Five xenografts were resistant to all compounds tested. We also assessed the mRNA expression levels of the xenografts for the O(6)-Methylguanine DNA Methyltransferase (MGMT), DNA topoisomerase II- (Topo II)-alpha, Gluthathione-S-transferase (GST)-pi, Multidrug-resistance related protein (MRP) 1 and Multidrug-resistance (MDR) 1 genes. There was an inverse correlation between the transcript levels of GST-pi and doxorubicin growth inhibition (r=-0.66; p<0.05), and between the transcript levels of MGMT and the effect of lomustine (r=-0.72; p<0.01), whereas the expression of MRP1 and cisplatin growth inhibition was positively correlated (r=0.82; p<0.005). This panel of xenografts should constitute a good tool for pharmacological and molecular studies in osteosarcoma.

Phase II study of ecteinascidin 743 in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent osteosarcoma

BACKGROUND

Recurrent osteosarcoma is a drug-resistant disease with a dismal prognosis. The objective of this Phase II study was to evaluate the activity of ecteinascidin 743 (ET-743) as a salvage therapy in these patients.

METHODS

Patients with recurrent osteosarcoma who had received standard chemotherapeutic agents were eligible. ET-743 was administered at a dose of 1500 microg/m(2) as a 24-hour infusion every 3 weeks. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed during the first cycle.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were enrolled, 23 of whom were assessable for response (median age of 18 years; range, 12-67 years). The median number of previous chemotherapeutic agents was five (range, three to eight previous agents). Sixty-one cycles were administered (median number of cycles per patient was 2; range, 1-9 cycles per patient). Three patients (12%) achieved minor responses (49% 36% and 25%, respectively). Fifteen patients (60%) developed a transient elevation of hepatic transaminases (Grade 3 or 4 [according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria]), which was not cumulative. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 12 patients (48%) and 6 patients (24%), respectively. The mean area under the curve (AUC) in 4 patients experiencing Grade 4 toxicity (76.4 +/- 29.3 ng x hr/mL) was significantly greater (P = 0.034) than that in those for whom the most severe toxicity was Grade 3 (39.5 +/- 17.2 ng x hr/mL [n = 12]) or Grade 1-2 (52.6 +/- 15.6 ng x hr/mL [n = 5]). There were no other significant correlations found between pharmacokinetic variables and patient characteristics, toxicity, or therapeutic response.

CONCLUSIONS

ET-743 was found to be well tolerated in heavily pretreated osteosarcoma patients but had limited antitumor activity as a single agent. The combination of ET-743 with cisplatin or doxorubicin should be considered.

Clinical and cellular pharmacology in relation to solid tumours of childhood

Our understanding of the clinical and cellular pharmacology of drugs commonly used in the treatment of childhood cancer have increased greatly over the past two decades. However, with the exception of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), our current knowledge of factors such as inter-patient pharmacokinetic variability and cellular determinants of chemosensitivity has not been utilized in the design of integrated clinical studies. Recent pre-clinical and clinical evaluation of the topoisomerase I inhibitors topotecan and irinotecan has highlighted the potential importance of pharmacological factors in their effectiveness as cytotoxics. In this review, the clinical and cellular pharmacology of vincristine, actinomycin D, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, cisplatin, carboplatin and etoposide will be discussed in relation to the major paediatric solid tumours. For each disease type, knowledge of the clinical and cellular pharmacology of a candidate drug will be related to pharmacodynamic responses such as response, toxicity and prognosis. For diseases such as Wilms' tumour, osteogenic sarcoma and Ewing's tumour, histological response to initial induction chemotherapy is of prognostic significance, and the depth of response is increasingly recognised as an important determinant of prognosis for high-risk neuroblastoma. For several of these tumour types, the dose-intensity of chemotherapy may be an important variable in determining prognosis. However the relationship between pharmacokinetic variability, cellular pharmacology and the major determinants of chemosensitivity to those drugs employed in first line therapy is unknown. The study of these relationships, by means of up front window studies in children who present with high-risk disease, may be as important as the introduction of new agents. Indeed, the optimisation of current therapies may be required to allow a fully informed selection of those children for whom novel therapies are truly needed. Funding and international collaboration at the clinical and scientific level would be required to achieve these aims.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for osteosarcoma of the extremities with metastases at presentation: recent experience at the Rizzoli Institute in 57 patients treated with cisplatin, doxorubicin, and a high dose of methotrexate and ifosfamide

BACKGROUND

Effective adjuvant or neoadjuvant regimens of chemotherapy have dramatically improved the prognosis of patients with high-grade osteosarcoma of the extremity, localized at diagnosis. Currently, little is known about patients with metastatic disease at presentation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From May 1995 to May 2000, 57 patients with osteosarcoma of the extremity, metastatic at presentation, were treated according to the following scheme: primary chemotherapy, restaging, simultaneous resection of primary tumor and metastatic lesions, and maintenance chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients achieved remission. At a follow-up ranging from 2 to 7 years, seven remained continuously free of disease, one died of chemotherapy-related toxicity and 27 patients relapsed. Twenty-one of the 22 patients who never achieved remission died as a result of the tumor, as well as 20 of the 27 who achieved remission but then relapsed. Of the remaining seven relapsing patients, six are alive with uncontrolled disease, while one is alive and free of disease 24 months after the last post-relapse treatment. Two-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 21% and 55%, respectively. These results are significantly poorer than those achieved in 128 contemporary patients with non-metastatic disease at presentation, treated with the same chemotherapy protocol (2-year EFS and OS of 75% and 94%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study confirm that the prognosis of patients with osteosarcoma of the extremity, metastatic at presentation, remains poor, despite the use of aggressive treatments.

Treatment of refractory osteosarcoma with fractionated cyclophosphamide and etoposide

PURPOSE

Standard multiagent chemotherapy for osteosarcoma may include platinum compounds, doxorubicin, and high-dose methotrexate. By identifying new chemotherapeutic strategies, the outcome of these patients can be improved and the toxicity of treatment regimens decreased.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The authors evaluated the activity of the combination of cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2 per day for 5 days) and etoposide (100 mg/m2 per day for 5 days) given with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to children with osteosarcoma unresponsive to conventional treatment.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients with refractory osteosarcoma were treated with this combination. Twelve patients had been previously treated with a multiagent regimen that included carboplatin, ifosfamide, methotrexate, and doxorubicin. Seven of 11 evaluable patients had a poor histologic response in their primary tumor at the time of definitive surgery (Huvos grade 1 or 2). Sites of relapse included lung, bone, and brain. A total of 47 courses were given. An overall response rate of 28.5% was achieved. A complete response was obtained in one patient (7.1%), a partial response was obtained in three patients (21.4%), and stable disease for 1 to 4 months was achieved in five patients (35.7%). Five patients (35.7%) had progressive disease. Grade 4 neutropenia was the primary form of toxicity observed; the median duration of absolute neurophil count less than 500/microL was 4 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of cyclophosphamide and etoposide resulted in a response rate of 28.5% in patients with refractory or relapsed osteosarcoma, and its incorporation into front-line therapies deserves further evaluation.

Phase II/III trial of etoposide and high-dose ifosfamide in newly diagnosed metastatic osteosarcoma: a pediatric oncology group trial

PURPOSE

The objectives of this trial were to estimate the response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival of patients who received therapy with etoposide and high-dose ifosfamide, and to define the toxicity of this combination when provided with standard chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic osteosarcoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients received infusions of 100 mg/m(2) per day of etoposide and 3.5 g/m(2) per day of ifosfamide for 5 days. Therapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was begun on day 6. This was repeated 3 weeks after therapy was begun. Response was determined at week 6 by both standard World Health Organization response criteria and by pathologic determination of tumor necrosis of the primary tumor.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients were registered; 39 were assessable for response and 41 for toxicity and survival. Twenty-eight (68%) of 41 had metastatic sites only in the lung; 12 (29%) had metastatic sites in other bones with or without lung involvement. Four patients (10%) experienced complete response, and 19 patients (49%) experienced partial response, for an overall response rate of 59% +/- 8%. The projected 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) for the 28 patients with metastases to lungs was 39% +/- 11%. The projected 2-year PFS for the 12 patients with metastases to other bones (with or without pulmonary metastases) was 58% +/- 17%. Two patients died as a result of therapy toxicity. Eighty-three percent of patients had grade 4 neutropenia, and 29% had grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Ten patients (24%) had sepsis. Fanconi's syndrome was observed in five patients.

CONCLUSION

The combination of etoposide and high-dose ifosfamide is effective induction chemotherapy for patients with metastatic osteosarcoma, despite significant associated myelosuppression sometimes complicated by infection and renal toxicity.

Interleukin-1 alpha increases the cytotoxic activity of etoposide against human osteosarcoma cells

The recurrence of pulmonary metastases resistant to salvage chemotherapy continues to be a major problem in osteosarcoma patients. Our goal is to identify novel combinations of biologic response modifiers plus chemotherapeutic agents that can be translated into clinical trials. Response rates of relapsed osteosarcoma patients to etoposide have been extremely low. The present investigation demonstrated that IL-1 alpha dramatically increased the sensitivity of MG-63, SAOS-2, and TE-85 osteosarcoma cells to etoposide when the two agents were used simultaneously. The cytostatic activity of 1 microM etoposide was increased from 35 to 70%, 30 to 65%, and 4 to 90%, respectively, by 5.0 U/ml IL-1 alpha. Analysis using the colony-forming assay to quantify cytotoxicity showed that the percentage of cell survival following exposure to etoposide decreased from 0.81 to 0.56, 0.55 to 0.2, and 0.4 to 0.05 when the combination treatment was used. Increased sensitivity was not seen when etoposide treatment preceded IL-1 alpha treatment. IL-1 alpha also increased the sensitivity of these cells to doxorubicin but not to cisplatin or topotecan. The mechanism of this enhanced activity is independent of p-glycoprotein, drug-uptake, or effects on topoisomerase II.

Presurgical window of carboplatin and surgery and multidrug chemotherapy for the treatment of newly diagnosed metastatic or unresectable osteosarcoma: Pediatric Oncology Group Trial

PURPOSE

Relapse remains a significant problem in patients with metastatic osteosarcoma. The response to carboplatin of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic or unresectable osteosarcoma was assessed in an upfront phase II window, which was followed-up by surgery and intensive multiagent chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-seven patients, ages 3 to 23 years with histologically confirmed diagnoses of osteosarcoma, were treated between January 1992 and November 1994 with carboplatin 1,000 mg/m2 per dose administered as a 48-hour continuous infusion. Two courses were administered in 3-week intervals, depending on marrow recovery. After radiographic reevaluation, patients underwent surgical removal of tumor (if feasible) and then 40 weeks of chemotherapy with high-dose methotrexate, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin.

RESULTS

One of the 37 evaluable patients demonstrated a partial response to carboplatin; there were no complete responses. Patients were additionally analyzed by the response of pulmonary metastases to therapy and the extent of tumor necrosis of the primary lesion. By these criteria, 8 of 37 (22%) of patients showed a response at one or more sites, whereas 20 of 37 (54%) had unequivocal disease progression. Severe myelosuppression was the major toxicity. The projected 3-year event-free and overall survival rates were 23.9% and 31.9%, respectively. Only 1 of 17 patients with unresectable disease or distant bone metastases remains alive, in contrast to 6 of 17 patients with the lung as their only metastatic site and two of three patients with resected regional bone metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous-infusion carboplatin demonstrated limited activity as an upfront agent in patients with metastatic osteosarcoma at diagnosis, even at doses that result in severe and prolonged myelosuppression. Patients with isolated pulmonary metastases or resectable bone metastases have a longer median survival time and greater chance of long-term survival than do patients with unresectable bone disease, for whom the prognosis remains dismal.

Developmental therapeutics in childhood cancer. A perspective from the Children's Oncology Group and the US Food and Drug Administration

Drug development in pediatric oncology has been reviewed, concentrating on overall development issues and COG studies of cytotoxic compounds. A variety of interesting molecules with more specific targeting are becoming available. The challenges that remain include the availability of such compounds for pediatric trial and their study in a timely fashion, and the subsequent incorporation of the new agents into more up-front regimens, with the ultimate shared goal of curing more children with less toxicity.

Current treatment of osteosarcoma

A comprehensive multidisciplinary approach has transformed osteosarcoma from a disease with a modest long-term survival to one in which at least two-thirds of patients will be cured. Surgery remains the vital modality for treating the primary tumor, whereas adjuvant chemotherapy plays an essential role in the control of subclinical metastatic disease. Complete surgical excision of the primary tumor remains an essential element of treatment. For many patients, a combination of advances in surgical technique, improved imaging modalities to accurately document tumor extent, and the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has made limb salvage procedures a safe alternative to amputation. In some patients for whom complete surgical excision is impossible, the addition of radiation therapy may allow local tumor control. The most effective chemotherapy agents currently in use include high-dose methotrexate, doxorubicin, cisplatin, and ifosfamide/etoposide. The optimal schedule of therapy is still being investigated, as is the role of dose intensification. Unfortunately, some groups of patients remain at high risk of eventual relapse. Those whose tumors show relatively low degrees of necrosis after administration of chemotherapy have poorer survival than patients with more chemotherapy-responsive tumors. Similarly, patients who present with overt metastatic disease (particularly bone metastases), as well as patients with tumors that recur after treatment, continue to have an unsatisfactory outcome. These groups, in particular, may benefit from future investigations into novel agents, such as biological response modifiers, antiangiogenesis factors, and growth receptor modulation.

Carboplatin/ifosfamide window therapy for osteosarcoma: results of the St Jude Children's Research Hospital OS-91 trial

PURPOSE

To determine the activity of carboplatin/ifosfamide in patients with previously untreated osteosarcoma and to estimate patient outcomes after a multiagent chemotherapy protocol that eliminated cisplatin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-nine patients with newly diagnosed, previously untreated osteosarcoma received three cycles of carboplatin (560 mg/m(2) x 1) and ifosfamide (2.65 g/m(2)/d x 3). Assessment of response was evaluated after two (week 6) and three (week 9) chemotherapy cycles. At week 9, histologic response was assessed. Adjuvant therapy comprised two additional carboplatin/ifosfamide cycles, doxorubicin, and high-dose methotrexate. Patients were stratified at enrollment: stratum A, resectable primary tumor without metastases; stratum B, unresectable primary tumor; and stratum C, metastatic disease at diagnosis. Week 6 response was compared with that of a historic group that received only ifosfamide during the initial window evaluation.

RESULTS

The clinical and radiographic response rate to three cycles of carboplatin/ifosfamide was 67.7% (95% confidence interval, 55.0% to 78.8%). Compared with the historic population who received only ifosfamide, the combination of carboplatin and ifosfamide reduced the progressive disease rate at week 6 (31.9% v 9%, P: = .003). For patients in stratum A, the 3-year event-free survival and survival were 72.3% +/- 6.7% and 76.4% +/- 6.4%, respectively. Patients who received carboplatin-based therapy had less long-term renal toxicity and ototoxicity.

CONCLUSION

This pilot trial suggests that carboplatin/ifosfamide combination chemotherapy has substantial antitumor activity. In the context of a multiagent chemotherapy protocol comprising high-dose methotrexate and doxorubicin, we found that the addition of carboplatin/ifosfamide resulted in patient outcomes comparable to trials using cisplatin-based therapy with less long-term toxicity.

High-dose methotrexate and HELP [Holoxan (ifosfamide), eldesine (vindesine), platinum]--doxorubicin in non-metastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity: a French multicentre pilot study. Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte contre le Cancer and Société Française d'Oncologie Pédiatrique

This study evaluates histological response, long-term outcome, and toxicity in an intensive chemotherapy program given before surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-two patients (39 males, 23 females: median age 14) with biopsy, chest computerised-tomography, technetium bone-scan and magnetic resonance imaging, were enrolled. Primary localisations were femur (44%) and tibia (26%). Induction chemotherapy involved seven courses of high-dose methotrexate and two courses of HELP (ifosfamide, eldesine (vindesine), cisplatin (platinum)-doxorubicin. After surgery, patients received six courses of high-dose methotrexate and two courses of HELP-doxorubicin.

RESULTS

Pre- and postoperative toxicities were similar. Fifty-nine patients underwent surgery; histological response was good in thirty-eight patients (64%) and poor in twenty-one (36%). Median follow-up is 57 months (range 30-80), with 77% overall survival and 59% progression-free survival. In a multivariate analysis, age under 10 years is the only prognostic factor that significantly correlates with outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

This regimen appears to increase histological necrosis, but associates with severe toxicity. Results for patients with less necrosis at surgery are encouraging. Future trials should determine the minimum effective doses to reduce toxicity. New drugs should be added.

Interferon-alpha enhances the sensitivity of human osteosarcoma cells to etoposide

The purpose of these studies was to determine whether interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) could enhance the sensitivity of human osteosarcoma cells to the cytotoxic actions of etoposide (VP-16). Cytostasis was determined using a [3H]thymidine incorporation assay, whereas cytotoxicity was quantified by a colony-formation assay. Low concentrations (0.1-5 U/ml) of IFN-alpha enhanced the cytostatic activity of VP-16 against MG-63, SAOS-2, and TE-85 osteosarcoma cells. The cytostatic activity of 1 microM VP-16 rose from 11% to 64%, 9% to 31%, and 10% to 71%, respectively, in the three cell lines when IFN-alpha was present. Survival fraction was also decreased when the osteosarcoma cells were treated with VP-16 + IFN-alpha as compared to either agent alone. The interaction between these two agents was determined to be synergistic rather than additive by interaction index analysis. Similar effects on cytostasis and cytotoxicity were observed when IFN-alpha was combined with Adriamycin but not cisplatin, actinomycin D, vinblastine, or amsacrine. VP-16 uptake was enhanced 12-fold in the presence of IFN-alpha, but this did not appear to translate into an increase in topoisomerase-II (topo-II)-DNA complex formation as quantified by the sodium dodecyl sulfate-KCl precipitation assay. We also could not detect alterations in topo-II expression, topo-II protein production, or cell cycle kinetics that have been shown to correlate with increased VP-16 cell sensitivity. Therefore, at this time the mechanism of enhanced cell sensitivity to the combination treatment remains unclear.

Ifosfamide/etoposide alternating with high-dose methotrexate: evaluation of a chemotherapy regimen for poor-risk osteosarcoma

Fifteen patients with relapsed osteosarcoma were treated with an intensive combination chemotherapy schedule. Ifosfamide 2.5 g m(-2) daily and etoposide 150 mg m(-2) daily coincidentally for 3 days and high-dose methotrexate 8 g m(-2) (with folinic acid rescue) on days 10-14 in a planned 21 -day cycle. Feasibility, toxicity and response to this alternative combination for the treatment of relapsed osteosarcoma was assessed. There were 98 evaluable cycles for toxicity and tolerability. The majority of cycles were well tolerated. Haematological toxicity of grade 3/4 (common toxicity criteria) was seen in all courses. Renal tubular loss of electrolytes, particularly magnesium, occurred in 71% of cycles. Thirteen per cent of cycles were repeated within 21 days and 61% within 28 days. In the thirteen patients evaluable for response, a partial response rate of 31% was seen after two cycles. However, patients with stable disease continued on therapy, and an overall consequent response rate of 62% was observed. Four patients were alive with no evidence of disease at 8-74 months. Three are alive with disease (at 8-19 months). There were six deaths, all disease related. This regimen exhibits an encouraging response rate in a group of children with poor prognosis disease, with a tolerable toxicity profile.

Activity of high-dose cyclophosphamide in the treatment of childhood malignant gliomas

Seventeen patients less than or equal to 20 years of age with newly diagnosed (n = 10) or recurrent (n = 7) malignant gliomas (anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma multiforme) were treated with cyclophosphamide in association with hematopoietic cytokines (GM-CSF or G-CSF). Cyclophosphamide was given at a dose of 2 g/m2 daily for 2 days at 4-week intervals. Toxicity consisted of grade IV neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 95% and 48% of cycles, respectively. There were no cyclophosphamide-related cardiac, pulmonary, or urothelial toxicities observed. Four of 10 patients with newly diagnosed disease demonstrated responses (three complete and one partial responses; one CR was only of 2 months duration). None of the seven patients with recurrent tumors demonstrated a response. We conclude that high-dose cyclophosphamide warrants further evaluation in children with newly diagnosed malignant glioma.

Postsurgical etoposide-ifosfamide regimen in poor-risk nonmetastatic osteogenic sarcoma

This prospective study was designed to test the activity of an ifosfamide-etoposide (VP-16) regimen on poor-risk, nonmetastatic, osteogenic sarcoma. A total of 13 patients with nonmetastatic osteogenic sarcoma with a poor histologic response to primary high-dose methotrexate-doxorubicin (Adriamycin)-cisplatinum chemotherapy received a total of six 5-day courses of ifosfamide (1,800 mg/m2) and etoposide (100 mg/m2) at three weekly intervals. The protocol was well tolerated, with only one case of transient renal failure. At present, eight patients (62%) have been in sustained complete remission with no evidence of recurrent disease for a mean follow-up of 3.4 years (range, 1.5-7.0 years). One patient is alive with lung metastases, and four have died of progressive disease. This prospective, albeit small, study confirms the efficacy of an ifosfamide-VP-16-based regimen in poor-risk, extremity, nonmetastatic osteogenic sarcoma. The demonstrated activity should spark large trials of ifosfamide-containing regimens in osteogenic sarcoma.

Osteosarcoma

Over the last several decades, significant advances have been made in our ability to understand and treat osteosarcoma. In this article we describe the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of patients with this disease. The surgical issues are discussed. We review the major clinical trials that have led to our current level of understanding. The current studies for the treatment of osteosarcoma are described.

Ifosfamide and etoposide in childhood osteosarcoma. A phase II study of the French Society of Paediatric Oncology

The aim of this phase II study was to determine the efficacy of high-dose ifosfamide with moderate dose etoposide in childhood osteosarcoma. From January 1992 to January 1995, 27 children (15 male, 12 female) with relapsed or refractory evaluable osteosarcoma were included in a phase II study of two courses of ifosfamide 3g/m2/day and etoposide 75 mg/m2/day for 4 days. Median age was 14 years (7-19 years). All but one had received high-dose methotrexate and doxorubicin as first-line treatment. 22 patients had previously received ifosfamide. This regimen was given as first-line in 1 patient, second-line in 23 and third-line in 3. Evaluable disease was lung metastases in 21 patients, local relapse in 5 and adenopathy in 1. There were six complete responses, seven partial responses, three minor responses, six stable disease and five progressive disease (including one mixed response). Response rate was 48% (95% confidence interval, 29-67%). Duration of response was not available (10 responding patients had other treatments). Response rate was equivalent in the subgroup of 22 patients who had previously received ifosfamide (4 CR, 6 PR). Among 3 patients who received the phase II regimen as third-line chemotherapy, there was 1 PR. All but 4 patients had a well tolerated grade 4 neutropenia. Transient mild confusion or seizures were each observed once. 5 patients are alive 15-31 months after the beginning of chemotherapy. This combination of drugs at this dosage has tolerable toxicity, is efficient and deserves evaluation in phase III studies.

Response of pediatric malignant solid tumors following ifosfamide or ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide: a single hospital experience

One hundred thirty-eight pediatric patients have received treatment for malignant solid tumors with ifosfamide with mesna, and 71 have received a combination with ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide (ICE). Responses were obtained in many types of pediatric tumors, yet comparison of responses was not possible because of inadequate numbers of tumors of differing histiotypes. Comparison of results between patients with all tumors treated with ifosfamide or ICE indicated that there was a higher response rate for patients treated with ICE, with an estimated odds ratio of 2.74 (95% C.I. 1.45-5.179). Excluding patients without prior chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the odds ratio for 2.801 (95% C.I. 1.45-5.4) suggests a similar result. There remain no guarantees that the more costly treatment with ICE, which requires cytokine support, will offer therapeutic benefits against resistant solid tumors.