Reference urodynamic values for stress incontinent women

[Stress incontinence and urogenital prolapse in women. What is decisive for successful surgical management?]

Surgery is indicated after failure of conservative treatment modalities in women with urinary stress incontinence and/or urogenital prolapse. As postoperative success rates and patients' satisfaction rates are highly dependent on patient selection and correct indication, the preoperative diagnostic work-up is essential to identify risk factors to predict postoperative continence rates, possible side effects, or complications. In these cases, patients have to be not only informed about failures prior to surgery but also offered alternative treatment options.

Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women

BACKGROUND

Urinary incontinence is a common and potentially debilitating problem. Open retropubic colposuspension is a surgical treatment which involves lifting the tissues near the bladder neck and proximal urethra in the area behind the anterior pubic bones to correct deficient urethral closure.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of open retropubic colposuspension for the treatment of urinary incontinence.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Register (searched 30 June 2008) and reference lists of relevant articles. We contacted investigators to locate extra studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials in women with symptoms or urodynamic diagnoses of stress or mixed urinary incontinence that included open retropubic colposuspension surgery in at least one trial group.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Studies were evaluated for methodological quality/susceptibility to bias and appropriateness for inclusion and data extracted by two of the reviewers. Trial data were analysed by intervention. Where appropriate, a summary statistic was calculated.

MAIN RESULTS

This review included 46 trials involving a total of 4738 women.Overall cure rates were 68.9% to 88.0% for open retropubic colposuspension. Two small studies suggest lower failure rates after open retropubic colposuspension compared with conservative treatment. Similarly, one trial suggests lower failure rates after open retropubic colposuspension compared to anticholinergic treatment. Evidence from six trials showed a lower failure rate for subjective cure after open retropubic colposuspension than after anterior colporrhaphy. Such benefit was maintained over time (RR of failure 0.51; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.76 before the first year, RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.57 at one to five years, RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.75 in periods beyond 5 years). In comparison with needle suspensions there was a lower failure rate after colposuspension in the first year after surgery (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.42 to 1.03), after the first year (RR 0.48; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.71), and beyond five years (RR 0.32; 95% CI 15 to 0.71). Evidence from twelve trials in comparison with suburethral slings found no significant difference in failure rates in all time periods assessed. Patient-reported failure rates in short, medium and long-term follow-up showed no significant difference between open and laparoscopic retropubic colposuspension, but with wide confidence intervals. In two trials failure was less common after Burch (RR 0.38 95% CI 0.18 to 0.76) than after the Marshall Marchetti Krantz procedure at one to five year follow-up. There were few data at any other follow-up time.In general, the evidence available does not show a higher morbidity or complication rate with open retropubic colposuspension, compared to the other open surgical techniques, although pelvic organ prolapse is more common than after anterior colporrhaphy and sling procedures.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence available indicates that open retropubic colposuspension is an effective treatment modality for stress urinary incontinence especially in the long term. Within the first year of treatment, the overall continence rate is approximately 85 to 90%. After five years, approximately 70% of patients can expect to be dry. Newer minimal access procedures like tension free vaginal tape look promising in comparison with open colposuspension but their long-term performance is not known and closer monitoring of its adverse event profile must be done. Laparoscopic colposuspension should allow speedier recovery but its relative safety and effectiveness is not known yet.

Normal preoperative urodynamic testing does not predict voiding dysfunction after Burch colposuspension versus pubovaginal sling

PURPOSE

Urodynamic studies have been proposed as a means of identifying patients at risk for voiding dysfunction after surgery for stress urinary incontinence. We determined if preoperative urodynamic findings predict postoperative voiding dysfunction after pubovaginal sling or Burch colposuspension.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were analyzed from preoperative, standardized urodynamic studies performed on participants in the Stress Incontinence Treatment Efficacy Trial, in which women with stress urinary incontinence were randomized to undergo pubovaginal sling surgery or Burch colposuspension. Voiding dysfunction was defined as use of any bladder catheter after 6 weeks, or reoperation for takedown of a pubovaginal sling or Burch colposuspension. Urodynamic study parameters examined were post-void residual urine, maximum flow during noninvasive flowmetry, maximum flow during pressure flow study, change in vesical pressure at maximum flow during pressure flow study, change in abdominal pressure at maximum flow during pressure flow study and change in detrusor pressure at maximum flow during pressure flow study. The study excluded women with a preoperative post-void residual urine volume of more than 150 ml or a maximum flow during noninvasive flowmetry of less than 12 ml per second unless advanced pelvic prolapse was also present.

RESULTS

Of the 655 women in whom data were analyzed voiding dysfunction developed in 57 including 8 in the Burch colposuspension and 49 in the pubovaginal sling groups. There were 9 patients who could not be categorized and, thus, were excluded from the remainder of the analysis (646). A total of 38 women used a catheter beyond week 6, 3 had a surgical takedown and 16 had both. All 19 women who had surgical takedown were in the pubovaginal sling group. The statistical analysis of urodynamic predictors is based on subsets of the entire cohort, including 579 women with preoperative uroflowmetry, 378 with change in vesical pressure, and 377 with change in abdominal and detrusor pressure values. No preoperative urodynamic study findings were associated with an increased risk of voiding dysfunction in any group. Mean maximum flow during noninvasive flowmetry values were similar among women with voiding dysfunction compared to those without voiding dysfunction in the entire group (23.4 vs 25.7 ml per second, p = 0.16), in the Burch colposuspension group (25.8 vs 25.7 ml per second, p = 0.98) and in the pubovaginal sling group (23.1 vs 25.7 ml per second, p = 0.17). Voiding pressures and degree of abdominal straining were not associated with postoperative voiding dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

In this carefully selected group preoperative urodynamic studies did not predict postoperative voiding dysfunction or the risk of surgical revision in the pubovaginal sling group. Our findings may be limited by the stringent exclusion criteria and studying a group believed to be at greater risk for voiding dysfunction could alter these findings. Additional analysis using subjective measures to define voiding dysfunction is warranted to further determine the ability of urodynamic studies to stratify the risk of postoperative voiding dysfunction, which appears to be limited in the current study.

Urodynamics in the management of female stress incontinence--which test and when?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews the literature from the last 12 months in the context of our existing knowledge base and reviews the contentious issue of the role of preoperative urodynamics for stress urinary incontinence, with particular reference to the choice of urodynamic investigations for diagnostic differentiation between intrinsic sphincter deficiency and urethral hypermobility, assessing symptom severity and predicting postoperative prognosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

While there are significant conflicting data regarding the role of urodynamics, particularly in the functional assessment of the urethra, it is clear that these diagnostic techniques can provide clinically useful data. It is in this context that recent guidelines advising on restricted use of invasive urodynamics preoperatively should be carefully reviewed.

SUMMARY

There is a pressing need for randomized controlled trials to be performed to fully assess the role of urodynamics in the preoperative assessment of stress urinary incontinence, especially at this time of rapid change in the surgical treatments available.

Urodynamic characterization of obese women with urinary incontinence undergoing a weight loss program: the Program to Reduce Incontinence by Diet and Exercise (PRIDE) trial

The purpose of this study was to describe urodynamic characteristics of overweight or obese women with urinary incontinence and explore the relationship between urodynamic parameters, body mass index (BMI), and abdominal circumference (AC). One hundred ten women underwent a standardized cough stress test and urodynamic study. Eighty-six percent of women had urodynamic stress incontinence and 15% detrusor overactivity. Intra-abdominal pressure (Pabd) at maximum cystometric capacity (MCC) increased 0.4 cm H(2)O per kg/m(2) unit of BMI (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.0,0.7, p = 0.04) and 0.4 cm H(2)O per 2 cm increase in AC (CI = 0.2, 0.7, p < 0.01). Intravesical pressure (Pves) at MCC increased 0.4 cm H(2)O per 2 cm increase in AC (CI = 0.0, 0.8, p = 0.05) but was not associated with BMI (p = 0.18). BMI and AC had a stronger association with Pabd than with Pves, suggesting a possible mechanism for the association between obesity and urinary incontinence.

Urodynamic measures do not predict stress continence outcomes after surgery for stress urinary incontinence in selected women

PURPOSE

We determined the prognostic value of preoperative urodynamic results in patients with stress urinary incontinence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a 9-center surgical trial, women with stress urinary incontinence were randomized to a Burch or pubovaginal sling procedure. Women were eligible for the study if they had predominant stress urinary incontinence symptoms, a positive cough stress test, a bladder capacity more than 200 ml and urethral hypermobility. Preoperative free uroflowmetry, filling cystometry and pressure flow studies were performed in all. Overall treatment success required a negative pad test, no urinary incontinence on a 3-day diary, a negative stress test, no self-reported stress urinary incontinence symptoms and no re-treatment for stress urinary incontinence. Stress specific success required all of the last 3 criteria. We examined urodynamic measures, and whether the presence of urodynamic stress incontinence, the presence of detrusor overactivity and Valsalva leak point pressure would predict surgical success.

RESULTS

Subjects with urodynamic stress incontinence had a 2-fold greater odds of overall success when compared with the No urodynamic stress incontinence group, but this trend did not quite reach statistical significance (OR 2.26; 95% C.I. 0.99, 5.17). Odds of stress specific success did not differ by urodynamic stress incontinence status. Subjects with detrusor overactivity did not have significantly worse success rates. Stratifying by treatment group, there was no difference in mean Valsalva leak point pressure values between surgical successes and failures.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a nearly statistically significant trend that women with urodynamic stress incontinence are twice as likely to have a successful overall outcome from surgical management of stress urinary incontinence as women without urodynamic stress incontinence. The level of Valsalva leak point pressure and the presence of detrusor overactivity do not predict the success outcomes after the Burch or autologous fascia sling procedures in women with pure or predominant stress urinary incontinence. The impact of urodynamic studies on surgical outcomes needs further investigation.