Outpatient versus inpatient IV antibiotic management for pediatric oncology patients with low risk febrile neutropenia: a randomised trial

Systematic review of reduced therapy regimens for children with low risk febrile neutropenia

PURPOSE

Reduced intensity therapy for children with low-risk febrile neutropenia may provide benefits to both patients and the health service. We have explored the safety of these regimens and the effect of timing of discharge.

METHODS

Multiple electronic databases, conference abstracts and reference lists were searched. Randomised controlled trials (RCT) and prospective observational cohorts examining the location of therapy and/or the route of administration of antibiotics in people younger than 18 years who developed low-risk febrile neutropenia following treatment for cancer were included. Meta-analysis using a random effects model was conducted. I (2) assessed statistical heterogeneity not due to chance.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42014005817).

RESULTS

Thirty-seven studies involving 3205 episodes of febrile neutropenia were included; 13 RCTs and 24 prospective observational cohorts. Four safety events (two deaths, two intensive care admissions) occurred. In the RCTs, the odds ratio for treatment failure (persistence, worsening or recurrence of fever/infecting organisms, antibiotic modification, new infections, re-admission, admission to critical care or death) with outpatient treatment was 0.98 (95% confidence interval (95%CI) 0.44-2.19, I (2) = 0 %) and with oral treatment was 1.05 (95%CI 0.74-1.48, I (2) = 0 %). The estimated risk of failure using outpatient therapy from all prospective data pooled was 11.2 % (95%CI 9.7-12.8 %, I (2) = 77.2 %) and using oral antibiotics was 10.5 % (95%CI 8.9-12.3 %, I (2) = 78.3 %). The risk of failure was higher when reduced intensity therapies were used immediately after assessment, with lower rates when these were introduced after 48 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

Reduced intensity therapy for specified groups is safe with low rates of treatment failure. Services should consider how these can be acceptably implemented.

Cellulitis: Home Or Inpatient in Children from the Emergency Department (CHOICE): protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Children needing intravenous antibiotics for cellulitis are usually admitted to hospital, whereas adults commonly receive intravenous treatment at home. This is a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of intravenous antibiotic treatment of cellulitis in children comparing administration of ceftriaxone at home with standard care of flucloxacillin in hospital. The study aims to compare (1) the rate of treatment failure at home versus hospital (2) the safety of treatment at home versus hospital; and (3) the effect of exposure to short course ceftriaxone versus flucloxacillin on nasal and gut micro-organism resistance patterns and the clinical implications.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

children aged 6 months to <18 years with uncomplicated moderate/severe cellulitis, requiring intravenous antibiotics.

EXCLUSIONS

complicated cellulitis (eg, orbital, foreign body) and immunosuppressed or toxic patients. The study is a single-centre, open-label, non-inferiority RCT. It is set in the emergency department (ED) at the Royal Children's Hospital (RCH) in Melbourne, Australia and the Hospital-in-the-Home (HITH) programme; a home-care programme, which provides outreach from RCH. Recruitment will occur in ED from January 2015 to December 2016. Participants will be randomised to either treatment in hospital, or transfer home under the HITH programme. The calculated sample size is 188 patients (94 per group) and data will be analysed by intention-to-treat.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

treatment failure defined as a change in treatment due to lack of clinical improvement according to the treating physician or adverse events, within 48 h

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

readmission to hospital, representation, adverse events, length of stay, microbiological results, development of resistance, cost-effectiveness, patient/parent satisfaction. This study has started recruitment.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the RCH Melbourne (34254C) and registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov registry (NCT02334124). We aim to disseminate the findings through international peer-reviewed journals and conferences.

CLINICAL TRIAL

Pre-results.

[Management of febrile neutropenias in adolescents and young adults: Differences of practice between adult and pediatric units]

INTRODUCTION

Adolescents and young adults (AYA, 15-25years old) with cancer are treated either in adult or pediatric units. Management of febrile neutropenia (FN) is different between these units. Monitoring rules and indications of hospitalization are often stricter in pediatrics. This study evaluates if these differences influence the occurrence of complications.

METHODS

The medical records of AYA patients treated in our institution in the Euro-E-W-I-N-G99 protocol between 01/09/2000 and 31/05/2013 were retrospectively analyzed. We studied febrile neutropenias occurring after VIDE courses, during the induction period.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were included (18 from adult units, 26 from pediatrics). Median age at inclusion was 19.6. After 260 courses of VIDE, we observed a median of 2 FN per adult and 3 per pediatric patient (P=0.2). Hospitalization occurred in median 1.5 time per adult and 3 per pediatric patient (P=0.008). Median cumulated length of stay was 4.5days for adults versus 16 days for pediatric patients (P=0.008). There was no significant difference for survival, number of documented infections, transfusions, dose modifications, chemotherapy delay, need for intensive care, infection after post-induction surgery.

CONCLUSION

AYA treated in adult services are less frequently hospitalized for FN with no difference in morbi-mortality. Homogeneous recommendations could be made for these patients, whatever the units they are treated in.