Inhibition of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase by bacteriophage T4 AsiA

Analysis of regions within the bacteriophage T4 AsiA protein involved in its binding to the sigma70 subunit of E. coli RNA polymerase and its role as a transcriptional inhibitor and co-activator

Bacteriophage T4 AsiA, a protein of 90 amino acid residues, binds to the sigma(70) subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and inhibits host or T4 early transcription or, together with the T4 MotA protein, activates T4 middle transcription. To investigate which regions within AsiA are involved in forming a complex with sigma(70) and in providing transcriptional functions we generated random mutations throughout AsiA and targeted mutations within the C-terminal region. We tested mutant proteins for their ability to complement the growth of T4 asiA am phage under non-suppressing conditions, to inhibit E. coli growth, to interact with sigma(70) region 4 in a two-hybrid assay, to bind to sigma(70) in a native protein gel, and to inhibit or activate transcription in vitro using a T4 middle promoter that is active with RNA polymerase alone, is inhibited by AsiA, and is activated by MotA/AsiA. We find that substitutions within the N-terminal half of AsiA, at amino acid residues V14, L18, and I40, rendered the protein defective for binding to sigma(70). These residues reside at the monomer-monomer interface in recent NMR structures of the AsiA dimer. In contrast, AsiA missing the C-terminal 44 amino acid residues interacted well with sigma(70) region 4 in the two-hybrid assay, and AsiA missing the C-terminal 17 amino acid residues (Delta74-90) bound to sigma(70) and was fully competent in standard in vitro transcription assays. However, the presence of the C-terminal region delayed formation of transcriptionally competent species when the AsiA/polymerase complex was pre-incubated with the promoter in the absence of MotA. Our results suggest that amino acid residues within the N-terminal half of AsiA are involved in forming or maintaining the AsiA/sigma(70) complex. The C-terminal region of AsiA, while not absolutely required for inhibition or co-activation, aids inhibition by slowing the formation of transcription complexes between a promoter and the AsiA/polymerase complex.

Identification and structure of the anti-sigma factor-binding domain of the disulphide-stress regulated sigma factor sigma(R) from Streptomyces coelicolor

The extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factor sigma(R) is a global regulator of redox homeostasis in the antibiotic-producing bacterium Streptomyces coelicolor, with a similar role in other actinomycetes such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Normally maintained in an inactive state by its bound anti-sigma factor RsrA, sigma(R) dissociates in response to intracellular disulphide-stress to direct core RNA polymerase to transcribe genes, such as trxBA and trxC that encode the enzymes of the thioredoxin disulphide reductase pathway, that re-establish redox homeostasis. Little is known about where RsrA binds on sigma(R) or how it suppresses sigma(R)-dependent transcriptional activity. Using a combination of proteolysis, surface-enhanced laser desorption ionisation mass spectrometry and pull-down assays we identify an N-terminal, approximately 10kDa domain (sigma(RN)) that encompasses region 2 of sigma(R) that represents the major RsrA binding site. We show that sigma(RN) inhibits transcription by an unrelated sigma factor and that this inhibition is relieved by RsrA binding, reaffirming that region 2 is involved in binding to core RNA polymerase but also demonstrating that the likely mechanism by which RsrA inhibits sigma(R) activity is by blocking this association. We also report the 2.4A resolution crystal structure of sigma(RN) that reveals extensive structural conservation with the equivalent region of sigma(70) from Escherichia coli as well as with the cyclin-box, a domain-fold found in the eukaryotic proteins TFIIB and cyclin A. sigma(RN) has a propensity to aggregate, due to steric complementarity of oppositely charged surfaces on the domain, but this is inhibited by RsrA, an observation that suggests a possible mode of action for RsrA which we compare to other well-studied sigma factor-anti-sigma factor systems.

Functional interaction of region 4 of the extracytoplasmic function sigma factor FecI with the cytoplasmic portion of the FecR transmembrane protein of the Escherichia coli ferric citrate transport system

Transcriptional regulation of the ferric citrate transport genes of Escherichia coli is initiated by the binding of ferric citrate to the outer membrane protein FecA. This binding elicits a signal that is transmitted by FecR across the cytoplasmic membrane into the cytoplasm, where the sigma factor FecI directs the RNA polymerase to the promoter upstream of the fecABCDE genes. An in vivo deletion analysis using a bacterial two-hybrid system assigned the interaction of the FecR and FecI proteins to the cytoplasmic portion of the FecR transmembrane protein and region 4 of FecI. Missense mutations randomly generated by PCR were localized to region 4 of FecI, and the mutants were impaired with regard to the interaction of FecR with FecI and fecB-lacZ transcription. The cloned region 4 of FecI interfered with fecB-lacZ transcription. Interaction of N-proximal regions of predicted FecR homologs with region 4 of predicted FecI homologs of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was demonstrated. The interaction was specific in that only cognate protein pairs interacted with each other; no interactions occurred between heterologous combinations of the P. aeruginosa proteins and between a P. aeruginosa FecI homolog and E. coli FecR. The results demonstrate that region 4 of FecI specifically binds FecR and that this binding is necessary for FecI to function as a sigma factor.

The bacteriophage T4 transcription activator MotA interacts with the far-C-terminal region of the sigma70 subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase

Transcription from bacteriophage T4 middle promoters uses Escherichia coli RNA polymerase together with the T4 transcriptional activator MotA and the T4 coactivator AsiA. AsiA binds tightly within the C-terminal portion of the sigma70 subunit of RNA polymerase, while MotA binds to the 9-bp MotA box motif, which is centered at -30, and also interacts with sigma70. We show here that the N-terminal half of MotA (MotA(NTD)), which is thought to include the activation domain, interacts with the C-terminal region of sigma70 in an E. coli two-hybrid assay. Replacement of the C-terminal 17 residues of sigma70 with comparable sigma38 residues abolishes the interaction with MotA(NTD) in this assay, as does the introduction of the amino acid substitution R608C. Furthermore, in vitro transcription experiments indicate that a polymerase reconstituted with a sigma70 that lacks C-terminal amino acids 604 to 613 or 608 to 613 is defective for MotA-dependent activation. We also show that a proteolyzed fragment of MotA that contains the C-terminal half (MotA(CTD)) binds DNA with a K(D(app)) that is similar to that of full-length MotA. Our results support a model for MotA-dependent activation in which protein-protein contact between DNA-bound MotA and the far-C-terminal region of sigma70 helps to substitute functionally for an interaction between sigma70 and a promoter -35 element.

A novel bacteriophage-encoded RNA polymerase binding protein inhibits transcription initiation and abolishes transcription termination by host RNA polymerase

Xp10 is a lytic bacteriophage of Xanthomonas oryzae, a Gram-negative bacterium that causes rice blight. We purified an Xp10 protein, p7, that binds to and inhibits X. oryzae RNA polymerase (RNAP). P7 is a novel 73 amino acid-long protein; it does not bind to and hence does not affect transcription by Escherichia coli RNAP. Analysis of E. coli/X. oryzae RNAP hybrids locates the p7 binding site to the largest X. oryzae RNAP subunit, beta'. Binding of p7 to X. oryzae RNAP holoenzyme prevents large conformational change that places the sigma subunit region 4 into the correct position for interaction with the -35 promoter element. As a result, open promoter complex formation on the -10/-35 class promoters is inhibited. Inhibition of promoter complex formation on the extended -10 class promoters is less efficient. The p7 protein also abolishes factor-independent transcription termination by X. oryzae RNAP by preventing the release of nascent RNA at terminators. Further physiological and mechanistic studies of this novel transcription factor should provide additional insights into its biological role and the processes of promoter recognition and transcription termination.

Autoregulation of a bacterial sigma factor explored by using segmental isotopic labeling and NMR

Bacterial sigma factors combine with the catalytic core RNA polymerase to direct the process of transcription initiation through sequence-specific interactions with the -10 and -35 elements of promoter DNA. In the absence of core RNA polymerase, the DNA-binding function of sigma is autoinhibited by its own N-terminal 90 amino acids (region 1.1), putatively by a direct interaction with conserved region 4.2, which binds the -35 promoter element. In the present work, this mechanism of autoinhibition was studied by using a combination of NMR spectroscopy and segmental isotopic labeling of a sigma70-like subunit from Thermotoga maritima. Our data argue strongly against a high-affinity interaction between these two domains. Instead we suggest that autoinhibition of DNA binding occurs through an indirect steric and/or electrostatic mechanism. More generally, the present work illustrates the power of segmental isotopic labeling for probing molecular interactions in large proteins by NMR.

Identification of two middle promoters upstream DNA ligase gene 30 of bacteriophage T4

Bacteriophage T4 DNA ligase gene 30 lies in the cluster of prereplicative genes located counterclockwise from map units 149 to 121. Based on the early transcription studies this gene has been considered as a typical early gene of bacteriophage T4. In agreement with this assignment, two strong T4 early promoters, P(E )30.8 (128.6) and P(E )30.7 (128.2), located about 3.1 and 2.7 kb upstream from gene 30 have been revealed by promoter mapping and sequence analysis. In addition, the existence of a putative early promoter just upstream of gene 30 was proposed from the sequence data. However, here we show that the putative early promoter just upstream of gene 30 is, in fact, a T4 middle promoter. Furthermore, we detected one more middle promoter located in the genomic region between early promoter P(E )30.7 (128.2) and DNA ligase gene 30 in the coding region of gene 30.3. Both new middle promoters have differences from the consensus MotA box, while their -10 regions match the sigma(70) consensus sequence very well. The 5' ends of MotA-dependent transcripts directed from these promoters, as well as the kinetics of 5' end accumulation in the cells, have been determined by primer extension analysis. The results of these analyses indicate that both MotA-dependent and MotA-independent promoters control the transcription of T4 DNA ligase gene 30 in vivo. Moreover, we show that the first transcripts for gene 30 are directed from its own middle promoter, P(M)30.

Novel nuclear-encoded proteins interacting with a plastid sigma factor, Sig1, in Arabidopsis thaliana

Sigma factor binding proteins are involved in modifying the promoter preferences of the RNA polymerase in bacteria. We found the nuclear encoded protein (SibI) that is transported into chloroplasts and interacts specifically with the region 4 of Sig1 in Arabidopsis. SibI and its homologue, T3K9.5 are novel proteins, which are not homologous to any protein of known function. The expression of sibI was tissue specific, light dependent, and developmentally timed. We suggest the transcriptional regulation by sigma factor binding proteins to function in the plastids of higher plant.

The MotA transcription factor from bacteriophage T4 contains a novel DNA-binding domain: the 'double wing' motif

MotA is a transcription factor from bacteriophage T4 that helps adapt the host Escherichia coli transcription apparatus to T4 middle promoters. We have determined the crystal structure of the C-terminal DNA-binding domain of MotA (MotCF) to 1.6 A resolution using multiwavelength, anomalous diffraction methods. The structure reveals a novel DNA-binding alpha/beta motif that contains an exposed beta-sheet surface that mediates interactions with the DNA. Independent biochemical experiments have shown that MotCF binds to one surface of a single turn of DNA through interactions in adjacent major and minor grooves. We present a model of the interaction in which beta-ribbons at opposite corners of the six-stranded beta-sheet penetrate the DNA grooves, and call the motif a 'double wing' to emphasize similarities to the 'winged-helix' motif. The model is consistent with data on how MotA functions at middle promoters, and provides an explanation for why MotA can form non-specific multimers on DNA.

Solution structure and stability of the anti-sigma factor AsiA: implications for novel functions

Anti-sigma factors regulate prokaryotic gene expression through interactions with specific sigma factors. The bacteriophage T4 anti-sigma factor AsiA is a molecular switch that both inhibits transcription from bacterial promoters and phage early promoters and promotes transcription at phage middle promoters through its interaction with the primary sigma factor of Escherichia coli, sigma(70). AsiA is an all-helical, symmetric dimer in solution. The solution structure of the AsiA dimer reveals a novel helical fold for the protomer. Furthermore, the AsiA protomer, surprisingly, contains a helix-turn-helix DNA binding motif, predicting a potential new role for AsiA. The AsiA dimer interface includes a substantial hydrophobic component, and results of hydrogen/deuterium exchange studies suggest that the dimer interface is the most stable region of the AsiA dimer. In addition, the residues that form the dimer interface are those that are involved in binding to sigma(70). The results promote a model whereby the AsiA dimer maintains the active hydrophobic surfaces and delivers them to sigma(70), where an AsiA protomer is displaced from the dimer via the interaction of sigma(70) with the same residues in AsiA that constitute the dimer interface.

A role for interaction of the RNA polymerase flap domain with the sigma subunit in promoter recognition

In bacteria, promoter recognition depends on the RNA polymerase sigma subunit, which combines with the catalytically proficient RNA polymerase core to form the holoenzyme. The major class of bacterial promoters is defined by two conserved elements (the -10 and -35 elements, which are 10 and 35 nucleotides upstream of the initiation point, respectively) that are contacted by sigma in the holoenzyme. We show that recognition of promoters of this class depends on the "flexible flap" domain of the RNA polymerase beta subunit. The flap interacts with conserved region 4 of sigma and triggers a conformational change that moves region 4 into the correct position for interaction with the -35 element. Because the flexible flap is evolutionarily conserved, this domain may facilitate promoter recognition by specificity factors in eukaryotes as well.

Flipping a genetic switch by subunit exchange

The bacteriophage T4 AsiA protein is a multifunctional protein that simultaneously acts as both a repressor and activator of gene expression during the phage life cycle. These dual roles with opposing transcriptional consequences are achieved by modification of the host RNA polymerase in which AsiA binds to conserved region 4 (SR4) of sigma(70), altering the pathway of promoter selection by the holoenzyme. The mechanism by which AsiA flips this genetic switch has now been revealed, in part, from the three-dimensional structure of AsiA and the elucidation of its interaction with SR4. The structure of AsiA is that of a novel homodimer in which each monomer is constructed as a seven-helix bundle arranged in four overlapping helix-loop-helix elements. Identification of the protein interfaces for both the AsiA homodimer and the AsiA-sigma(70) complex reveals that these interfaces are coincident. Thus, the AsiA interaction with sigma(70) necessitates that the AsiA homodimer dissociate to form an AsiA-SR4 heterodimer, exchanging one protein subunit for another to alter promoter choice by RNA polymerase.

Bacterial two-hybrid analysis of interactions between region 4 of the sigma(70) subunit of RNA polymerase and the transcriptional regulators Rsd from Escherichia coli and AlgQ from Pseudomonas aeruginosa

A number of transcriptional regulators mediate their effects through direct contact with the sigma(70) subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP). In particular, several regulators have been shown to contact a C-terminal portion of sigma(70) that harbors conserved region 4. This region of sigma contains a putative helix-turn-helix DNA-binding motif that contacts the -35 element of sigma(70)-dependent promoters directly. Here we report the use of a recently developed bacterial two-hybrid system to study the interaction between the putative anti-sigma factor Rsd and the sigma(70) subunit of E. coli RNAP. Using this system, we found that Rsd can interact with an 86-amino-acid C-terminal fragment of sigma(70) and also that amino acid substitution R596H, within region 4 of sigma(70), weakens this interaction. We demonstrated the specificity of this effect by showing that substitution R596H does not weaken the interaction between sigma and two other regulators shown previously to contact region 4 of sigma(70). We also demonstrated that AlgQ, a homolog of Rsd that positively regulates virulence gene expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, can contact the C-terminal region of the sigma(70) subunit of RNAP from this organism. We found that amino acid substitution R600H in sigma(70) from P. aeruginosa, corresponding to the R596H substitution in E. coli sigma(70), specifically weakens the interaction between AlgQ and sigma(70). Taken together, our findings suggest that Rsd and AlgQ contact similar surfaces of RNAP present in region 4 of sigma(70) and probably regulate gene expression through this contact.

Different roles for basic and aromatic amino acids in conserved region 2 of Escherichia coli sigma(70) in the nucleation and maintenance of the single-stranded DNA bubble in open RNA polymerase-promoter complexes

Amino acid residues in region 2 of final sigma(70) have been shown to play an important role in the strand separation step that is necessary for formation of the functional or open RNA polymerase-promoter complex. Here we present a comparison of the roles of basic and aromatic amino acids in the accomplishment of this process, using RNA polymerase bearing alanine substitutions for both types of amino acids in region 2. We determined the effects of the substitutions on the kinetics of open complex formation, as well as on the ability of the RNA polymerase to form complexes with single-stranded DNA, and with forked DNA duplexes carrying a single-stranded overhang consisting of bases in the -10 region. We concluded that two basic amino acids (Lys(414) and Lys(418)) are important for promoter binding and demonstrated distinct roles, at a subsequent step, for two aromatic amino acids (Tyr(430) and Trp(433)). It is likely that these four amino acids, which are close to each other in the structure of final sigma(70), together are involved in the nucleation of the strand separation process.

The Escherichia coli RNA polymerase.anti-sigma 70 AsiA complex utilizes alpha-carboxyl-terminal domain upstream promoter contacts to transcribe from a -10/-35 promoter

During infection of Escherichia coli, the phage T4 early protein AsiA inhibits open complex formation by the RNA polymerase holoenzyme Efinal sigma(70) at -10/-35 bacterial promoters through binding to region 4.2 of the final sigma(70) subunit. We used the -10/-35 lacUV5 promoter to study the properties of the Efinal sigma(70). AsiA complex in the presence of the glutamate anion. Under these experimental conditions, inhibition by AsiA was significantly decreased. KMnO(4) probing showed that the observed residual transcriptional activity was due to the slow transformation of the ternary complex Efinal sigma(70). AsiA.lacUV5 into an open complex. In agreement with this observation, affinity of the enzyme for the promoter was 10-fold lower in the ternary complex than in the binary complex Efinal sigma(70).lacUV5. A tau plot analysis of abortive transcription reactions showed that AsiA binding to Efinal sigma(70) resulted in a 120-fold decrease in the second-order on-rate constant of the reaction of Efinal sigma(70) with lacUV5 and a 55-fold decrease in the rate constant of the isomerization step leading to the open complex. This ternary complex still responded to activation by the cAMP.catabolite activator protein complex. We show that compensatory Efinal sigma(70)/promoter upstream contacts involving the C-terminal domains of alpha subunits in Efinal sigma(70) become essential for the binding of Efinal sigma(70). AsiA to the lacUV5 promoter.

Mechanisms of transcriptional repression

Transcriptional repressors are usually viewed as proteins that bind to promoters in a way that impedes subsequent binding of RNA polymerase. Although this repression mechanism is found at several promoters, there is a growing list of repressors that inhibit transcription initiation in other ways. For example, several repressors allow the simultaneous binding of RNA polymerase to the promoter, but interfere with subsequent events of the initiation process, eventually inhibiting transcription initiation. The recent increase in the number of repressors for which the repression mechanism has been characterized in detail has shown an amazing variety of strategies to repress transcription initiation. It is not surprising to find that the repression mechanism used is usually exquisitely adapted to the characteristics of the promoter and of the repressor involved.

Substitutions in bacteriophage T4 AsiA and Escherichia coli sigma(70) that suppress T4 motA activation mutations

Bacteriophage T4 middle-mode transcription requires two phage-encoded proteins, the MotA transcription factor and AsiA coactivator, along with Escherichia coli RNA polymerase holoenzyme containing the sigma(70) subunit. A motA positive control (pc) mutant, motA-pc1, was used to select for suppressor mutations that alter other proteins in the transcription complex. Separate genetic selections isolated two AsiA mutants (S22F and Q51E) and five sigma(70) mutants (Y571C, Y571H, D570N, L595P, and S604P). All seven suppressor mutants gave partial suppressor phenotypes in vivo as judged by plaque morphology and burst size measurements. The S22F mutant AsiA protein and glutathione S-transferase fusions of the five mutant sigma(70) proteins were purified. All of these mutant proteins allowed normal levels of in vitro transcription when tested with wild-type MotA protein, but they failed to suppress the mutant MotA-pc1 protein in the same assay. The sigma(70) substitutions affected the 4.2 region, which binds the -35 sequence of E. coli promoters. In the presence of E. coli RNA polymerase without T4 proteins, the L595P and S604P substitutions greatly decreased transcription from standard E. coli promoters. This defect could not be explained solely by a disruption in -35 recognition since similar results were obtained with extended -10 promoters. The generalized transcriptional defect of these two mutants correlated with a defect in binding to core RNA polymerase, as judged by immunoprecipitation analysis. The L595P mutant, which was the most defective for in vitro transcription, failed to support E. coli growth.

Mapping the molecular interface between the sigma(70) subunit of E. coli RNA polymerase and T4 AsiA

Bacteriophage T4 antisigma protein AsiA (10 kDa) orchestrates a switch from the host and early viral transcription to middle viral transcription by binding to the sigma(70) subunit of E. coli RNA polymerase. The molecular determinants of sigma(70)-AsiA complex formation are not known. Here, we used combinatorial peptide chemistry, protein-protein crosslinking, and mutational analysis to study the interaction between AsiA and its target, the 33 amino acid residues-long sigma(70) peptide containing conserved region 4.2. Many region 4.2 amino acid residues contact AsiA, which likely completely occludes the DNA-binding surface of region 4.2. Though none of region 4.2 amino acid residues is singularly responsible for the very tight interaction with AsiA, sigma(70) Lys593 and Arg596 which lie outside the putative DNA recognition element of region 4.2, contribute the most. In AsiA, the first 20 amino acid residues are both necessary and sufficient for interactions with sigma(70). Our results clarify details of sigma(70)-AsiA interaction and open the way for engineering AsiA derivatives with altered specificities.

The anti-sigma factor SpoIIAB forms a 2:1 complex with sigma(F), contacting multiple conserved regions of the sigma factor

The developmental regulatory protein sigma(F) of Bacillus subtilis, a member of the sigma(70)-family of bacterial RNA polymerase sigma factors, is negatively regulated by the anti-sigma factor SpoIIAB, which binds to sigma(F), sequestering it in an inactive complex. SpoIIAB binding to sigma(F) is strongly stimulated by ATP. Here, we use a combination of gel filtration chromatography, dynamic light-scattering, analytical ultracentrifugation, limited proteolysis with N-terminal sequencing and electrospray mass spectrometry, and deletion analysis to probe the SpoIIAB-sigma(F) complex. The studies were facilitated by investigating the homologs from Bacillus stearothermophilus as well as co-expression of the proteins in Escherichia coli, allowing purification of large quantities of the in vivo assembled complex. We determined the stoichiometry of the complex to be SpoIIAB(2):sigma(F)(1). Alone, sigma(F) is rapidly degraded by the protease trypsin. In the complex with SpoIIAB, however, sigma(F) is remarkably resistant to proteolysis. Analysis of the protease cleavage data indicates the anti-sigma binds sigma(F) through contacts with mutliple conserved regions of the sigma factor, supporting previous findings based on genetic data.

Aromatic amino acids in region 2.3 of Escherichia coli sigma 70 participate collectively in the formation of an RNA polymerase-promoter open complex

Formation of an initiation-competent RNA polymerase-promoter complex involves DNA melting over a region of about 12 base-pairs, which includes the start site of transcription, thus enabling the template strand to base-pair with the initiating nucleoside triphosphates. By studying the effects of alanine substitutions, we have investigated the role of the aromatic amino residues in the Escherichia coli sigma(70) conserved region 2.3 in promoter strand separation. The resulting mutants were assessed for their activity in vivo in the context of a sigma(70)/sigma(32) hybrid sigma factor that could be targeted to a specific hybrid promoter in the cell. All substitutions lead to an at least twofold reduction in expression of the hybrid promoter-driven reporter gene. The in vitro assay of single substitutions indicated cold sensitivity similar to that previously observed with analogous substitutions in Bacillus subtilis sigma(A). Kinetic assays showed that these substitutions slowed the rate of open complex formation at 37 degrees C as well. RNA polymerase reconstituted with a sigma(70) containing multiple alanine substitutions readily binds to promoter DNA, but then proceeds slowly beyond the first intermediate complex on the pathway to formation of the transcription-competent complex. These data demonstrate that together the aromatic residues in region 2.3 of E. coli sigma(70) ensure that DNA strand separation proceeds efficiently, even if no individual residue may be essential for accomplishment of the process.

The bacteriophage T4 anti-sigma factor AsiA is not necessary for the inhibition of early promoters in vivo

Bacteriophage T4 early promoters are utilized immediately after infection and are abruptly turned off 2-3 min later (at 30 degrees C) when the middle promoters are activated. The viral early protein AsiA has been suspected to bring about this transcriptional switch: not only does it activate transcription at middle promoters in vivo and in vitro but it also shows potent anti-sigma70 activity in vitro, suggesting that it is responsible for the shut-off of early transcription. We show here that after infection with a phage deleted for the asiA gene the inhibition of early transcription occurs to the same extent and with the same kinetics as in a wild-type infection. Thus, another AsiA-independent circuit efficiently turns off early transcription. The association of a mutation in asiA with a mutation in mod, rpbA, motA or motB has no effect on the inhibition of early promoters, showing that none of these phage-encoded transcriptional regulators is necessary for AsiA-independent shut-off. It is not known whether AsiA is able to inhibit early promoters in vivo, but host transcription is strongly inhibited in vivo upon induction of AsiA from a multicopy plasmid.

The response regulator RssB, a recognition factor for sigmaS proteolysis in Escherichia coli, can act like an anti-sigmaS factor

sigmaS (RpoS) is the master regulator of the general stress response in Escherichia coli. Several stresses increase cellular sigmaS levels by inhibiting proteolysis of sigmaS, which under non-stress conditions is a highly unstable protein. For this ClpXP-dependent degradation, the response regulator RssB acts as a recognition factor, with RssB affinity for sigmaS being modulated by phosphorylation. Here, we demonstrate that RssB can also act like an anti-sigma factor for sigmaS in vivo, i.e. RssB can inhibit the expression of sigmaS-dependent genes in the presence of high sigmaS levels. This becomes apparent when (i) the cellular RssB/sigmaS ratio is at least somewhat elevated and (ii) proteolysis is reduced (for example in stationary phase) or eliminated (for example in a clpP mutant). Two modes of inhibition of sigmaS by RssB can be distinguished. The 'catalytic' mode is observed in stationary phase cells with a substoichiometric RssB/sigmaS ratio, requires ClpP and therefore probably corresponds to sequestering of sigmaS to Clp protease (even though sigmaS is not degraded). The 'stoichiometric' mode occurs in clpP mutant cells upon overproduction of RssB to levels that are equal to those of sigmaS, and therefore probably involves binary complex formation between RssB and sigmaS. We also show that, under standard laboratory conditions, the cellular level of RssB is more than 20-fold lower than that of sigmaS and is not significantly controlled by stresses that upregulate sigmaS. We therefore propose that antisigma factor activity of RssB may play a role under not yet identified growth conditions (which may result in RssB induction), or that RssB is a former antisigma factor that during evolution was recruited to serve as a recognition factor for proteolysis.

Two new early bacteriophage T4 genes, repEA and repEB, that are important for DNA replication initiated from origin E

Two new, small, early bacteriophage T4 genes, repEA and repEB, located within the origin E (oriE) region of T4 DNA replication, affect functioning of this origin. An important and unusual property of the oriE region is that it is transcribed at early and late periods after infection, but in opposite directions (from complementary DNA strands). The early transcripts are mRNAs for RepEA and RepEB proteins, and they can serve as primers for leading-strand DNA synthesis. The late transcripts, which are genuine antisense RNAs for the early transcripts, direct synthesis of virion components. Because the T4 genome contains several origins, and because recombination can bypass a primase requirement for retrograde synthesis, neither defects in a single origin nor primase deficiencies are lethal in T4 (Mosig et al., FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 17:83-98, 1995). Therefore, repEA and repEB were expected and found to be important for T4 DNA replication only when activities of other origins were reduced. To investigate the in vivo roles of the two repE genes, we constructed nonsense mutations in each of them and combined them with the motA mutation sip1 that greatly reduces initiation from other origins. As expected, T4 DNA synthesis and progeny production were severely reduced in the double mutants as compared with the single motA mutant, but early transcription of oriE was reduced neither in the motA nor in the repE mutants. Moreover, residual DNA replication and growth of the double mutants were different at different temperatures, suggesting different functions for repEA and repEB. We surmise that the different structures and protein requirements for functioning of the different origins enhance the flexibility of T4 to adapt to varied growth conditions, and we expect that different origins in other organisms with multiorigin chromosomes might differ in structure and function for similar reasons.

Study of the interaction between bacteriophage T4 asiA and Escherichia coli sigma(70), using the yeast two-hybrid system: neutralization of asiA toxicity to E. coli cells by coexpression of a truncated sigma(70) fragment

The interaction of T4 phage-encoded anti-sigma factor, asiA, and Escherichia coli sigma(70) was studied by using the yeast two-hybrid system. Truncation of sigma(70) to identify the minimum region involved in the interaction showed that the fragment containing amino acid residues proximal to the C terminus (residues 547 to 603) was sufficient for complexing to asiA. Studies also indicated that some of the truncated C-terminal fragments (residues 493 to 613) had higher affinity for asiA as judged by the increased beta-galactosidase activity. It is proposed that the observed higher affinity may be due to the unmasking of the binding region of asiA on the sigma protein. Advantage was taken of the increased affinity of truncated sigma(70) fragments to asiA in designing a coexpression system wherein the toxicity of asiA expression in E. coli could be neutralized and the complex of truncated sigma(70) and asiA could be expressed in large quantities and purified.

Sigma competition: the contest between bacteriophage T4 middle and late transcription

In bacterial transcription, diverse sigma-family promoter recognition proteins compete for a common RNA polymerase core. Bacteriophage T4 infection ultimately reduces this competition to a duel between activated viral middle and enhanced late transcription, involving two sigma proteins, two phage-encoded activator proteins and two phage-specific co-activators. This competition has been analyzed in vitro, and the relative abundances in T4-infected Escherichia coli of the participating proteins have been measured. Activated late transcription holds an advantage over activated middle transcription, especially at higher ionic strength. This advantage is further compounded by ADP-ribosylation of the RNA polymerase alpha subunits, and by the phage-specific, RNA polymerase core-bound RpbA subunit. The largest contribution to the middle-late competition is made by gp55, the late sigma factor, but not enough of gp55 is produced during T4 infection to shut off middle transcription by direct competition with sigma(70). AsiA, the originally identified anti-sigma protein is not a major determinant of middle-late competition.

Inhibition of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase by bacteriophage T7 gene 2 protein

The 64 amino acid residue product of bacteriophage T7 gene 2 (gp2) binds the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and inhibits transcription. We localized the gp2 binding site to within 53 amino acid residues in the functionally dispensable region of the RNA polymerase beta' subunit. We investigated the effect of gp2 on transcription at a -10/-35 promoter and at an "extended -10" promoter. Our results indicate that binding of gp2 to the sigma70holoenzyme (Esigma70) prevents promoter recognition at -10/-35 promoters. Once open promoter complexes are formed, however, Esigma70transcription is resistant to gp2, since gp2 can no longer bind RNA polymerase. Surprisingly, transcription inhibition by gp2 is both sigma and promoter-specific. gp2 has little effect on Esigma70transcription from an extended -10 promoter, which does not depend on sigma70region 4 interactions with the -35 promoter box for its activity. gp55-dependent phage T4 late promoter transcription is also resistant to gp2. From these results, we conclude that the interaction of the sigma70region 4 with the -35 consensus promoter element is the primary target of gp2 inhibition.

Overproduction and characterization of the Bacillus subtilis anti-sigma factor FlgM

FlgM is an anti-sigma factor of the flagellar-specific sigma (sigma) subunit of RNA polymerase in Bacillus subtilis, and it is responsible of the coupling of late flagellar gene expression to the completion of the hook-basal body structure. We have overproduced the protein in soluble form and characterized it. FlgM forms dimers as shown by gel exclusion chromatography and native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and interacts in vitro with the cognate sigmaD factor. The FlgM.sigmaD complex is a stable heterodimer as demonstrated by gel exclusion chromatography, chemical cross-linking, native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and isoelectric focusing. sigmaD belongs to the group of sigma factors able to bind to the promoter sequence even in the absence of core RNA polymerase. The FlgM.sigmaD complex gave a shift in a DNA mobility shift assay with a probe containing a sigmaD-dependent promoter sequence. Limited proteolysis studies indicate the presence of two structural motifs, corresponding to the N- and C-terminal regions, respectively.

Anti-sigma factors

Anti-sigma factors modulate the expression of numerous regulons controlled by alternative sigma factors. Anti-sigma factors are themselves regulated by either secretion from the cell (i.e. FlgM export through the hook-basal body), sequestration by an anti-anti-sigma (i.e. phosphorylation regulated partner-switching modules), or interaction with extracytoplasmic proteins or small molecule effectors (i.e. transmembrane regulators of extracytoplasmic function sigma factors). Recent highlights include the genetic description of the opposed sigma/anti-sigma binding surfaces; the unexpected role of FlgM in holoenzyme destabilization and the finding that folding of FlgM is coupled to sigma28 binding; the first structure determination for an anti-sigma antagonist; and the detailed dissection of two complex partner-switching modules in Bacillus subtilis.

The flagellar anti-sigma factor FlgM actively dissociates Salmonella typhimurium sigma28 RNA polymerase holoenzyme

The anti-sigma factor FlgM of Salmonella typhimurium inhibits transcription of class 3 flagellar genes through a direct interaction with the flagellar-specific sigma factor, sigma28. FlgM is believed to prevent RNA polymerase (RNAP) holoenzyme formation by sequestering free sigma28. We have analyzed FlgM-mediated inhibition of sigma28 activity in vitro. FlgM is able to inhibit sigma28 activity even when sigma28 is first allowed to associate with core RNAP. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) was used to evaluate the interaction between FlgM and both sigma28 and sigma28 holoenzyme (Esigma28). The Kd of the sigma28-FlgM complex is approximately 2 x 10(-10) M; missense mutations in FlgM that cause a defect in sigma28 inhibition in vivo increase the Kd of this interaction by 4- to 10-fold. SPR measurements of Esigma28 dissociation in the presence of FlgM indicate that FlgM destabilizes Esigma28, presumably via an interaction with the sigma subunit. Our data provide the first direct evidence of an interaction between FlgM and Esigma28. We propose that this secondary activity of FlgM, which we term holoenzyme destabilization, enhances the sensitivity of the cell to changes in FlgM levels during flagellar biogenesis.