Aminoglycosides: single or multiple daily dosing? A meta-analysis on efficacy and safety

Pharmacodynamic characterization of nephrotoxicity associated with once-daily aminoglycoside

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To characterize nephrotoxicity associated with an individualized serum concentration target-specific, once-daily aminoglycoside (ODA) program.

DESIGN

Concurrent and retrospective study.

SETTING

University-affiliated trauma hospital.

PATIENTS

Two hundred patients treated with ODA and 100 treated with individualized traditional dosing (TDA).

INTERVENTIONS

Empiric dosing for both groups was based on patient-specific pharmacokinetics and severity of infection. Regimens were modified according to predetermined target maximum and minimum serum concentrations for both groups.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Nephrotoxicity occurred in 7.5% patients treated with ODA and 14.7% receiving TDA (p=0.05). Minimum serum concentrations, length of aminoglycoside therapy, and cumulative area under the curve (AUC) were all dependently related to nephrotoxicity, and concomitant vancomycin and other nephrotoxic drugs were independently related to the disorder. The cumulative AUC was greatest in patients receiving TDA (p=0.03), and the modeled probability of becoming toxic at any given cumulative AUC was significantly greater with TDA than with ODA (p<0.01). Clinical and microbiologic outcomes were similar between groups. Maximum concentration:minimum inhibitory concentration ratios were higher (p<0.01) and number of days to organism eradication was shorter in the ODA group (p=0.04).

CONCLUSION

The trend was toward decreased nephrotoxicity in patients treated with ODA compared with TDA, and at any given cumulative AUC, the risk of toxicity was lower for ODA.

Pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in 957 patients with varying renal function dosed once daily

AIMS

1. To determine the population pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in 957 patients with varying renal function dosed once daily. 2. To see if current starting doses for once daily aminoglycoside dosing are appropriate. 3. To test whether calculating creatinine clearance using an adjusted Cockcroft and Gault method (CLCr,adjusted ) was a better predictor of gentamicin clearance than the standard Cockcroft and Gault method (CLCr,unadjusted ).

METHODS

Nine hundred and fifty-seven patients were dose-individualized for gentamicin using SeBA-GEN, a Bayesian dosing method. This method returns estimates of the values of gentamicin CL and V d from which the 24 h AUC can be estimated. The goal of therapy was to attain an AUC of 70-100 mg l-1 h depending on the severity of the infection. The population was divided into four groups of differing renal function. Linear regression analysis was performed to determine the relationship between V d and various indices of weight, and gentamicin CL and either CLCr,adjusted or CLCr,unadjusted.

RESULTS

The mean V d (+/-s. d.) and CL (+/-s.d.) of gentamicin in our total population were 17.4 (+/-4.1) l and 4.0 (+/-1.8) l h-1, respectively. There was a decrease in V d with reducing renal function when comparing patients with normal renal function and patients with poor renal function. The lower of total body weight (TBW) and lean body weight (LBW), termed dosing weight (DWT), was a slightly better predictor of V d (r2=0.28) than either TBW (r2=0.21) or LBW (r2=0.21). CLCr,adjusted (r2=0.80) was a better predictor of gentamicin CL than CLCr, unadjusted (r2=0.57).

CONCLUSIONS

The mean population values of V d and CL of gentamicin dosed once daily are similar to those described by others in relation to multiple daily dosing. Given that previous methods have been based on population values of V d and CL from multiple daily dosing, the currently recommended starting doses for once daily aminoglycoside dosing would seem appropriate. The V d reduced with decreasing renal function, with a maximum of 23% difference between patients with normal and poor renal function. The Cockcroft and Gault method of calculating creatinine clearance does not appear to perform well at low values of serum creatinine concentration. An adjustment of the Cockcroft and Gault method is proposed to allow for this.

Once-daily aminoglycosides in the treatment of gram-positive endocarditis

OBJECTIVE

To examine the role of once-daily aminoglycosides (ODA) in the treatment of gram-positive endocarditis.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search was conducted from January 1984 to August 1998, and a Current Contents search was performed from September 1998 to December 1998, using endocarditis or aminoglycoside as key words. In addition, relevant articles were cross-referenced to screen for additional information.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data published in English regarding the use of aminoglycosides in endocarditis are cited. Emphasis was placed on animal and human studies, but in vitro studies and review articles are also included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Endocarditis and the pharmacology of aminoglycosides are briefly reviewed. ODA is an alternative to conventional dosing in the treatment of endocarditis. Extensive work in endocarditis has been done recently in animals and humans to add to our understanding. Limited clinical data exist to support the theoretical advantages of increased efficacy, reduced toxicity, and potential cost savings versus traditional synergistic aminoglycoside dosing. Optimal monitoring of ODA remains undefined.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine use of ODA for the treatment of endocarditis is not yet advocated. Promising supporting evidence and speculation of success of ODA in gram-positive endocarditis justify well-designed trials to further define its role in therapy.

Effectiveness and toxicity of gentamicin in an experimental model of pyelonephritis: effect of the time of administration

Temporal variations in the renal toxicity of aminoglycosides have been reported for experimental animals as well as for humans. In fact, maximal renal toxicity of aminoglycosides was observed when the drug was given during the rest period, while a lower toxicity was observed when the drug was injected during the activity period. The aim of the present study was to evaluate temporal variations in the effectiveness and renal toxicity of gentamicin in an experimental model of pyelonephritis in rats. The experiments were carried out with female Sprague-Dawley rats (185 to 250 g). They had free access to food and water throughout the study and were maintained on a 14-h light-10-h dark cycle. Animals were divided into four groups corresponding to the respective time of induction of pyelonephritis and treatment: 0700, 1300, 1900, and 0100 h. Pyelonephritis was induced by a direct inoculation of Escherichia coli (10(7) to 10(8) CFU) in the left kidney. Animals were treated for 3 and 7 days with a single daily dose of gentamicin (20 and 40 mg/kg of body weight, respectively) or saline (NaCl, 0.9%) at either 0700, 1300, 1900, or 0100 h. Animals treated at 0100 h for 3 days with gentamicin (20 mg/kg) showed a significantly lower number of bacteria in their kidneys than did all other groups (P < 0.01). After 7 days of treatment, the efficacy, evaluated by the log CFU per gram of tissue and by the percentage of sterilized kidneys, was also higher when gentamicin was administered at 0100 h. The beta-galactosidase and the N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase activities were significantly higher in urine of rats given gentamicin at 1300 h than in urine of rats treated at another time of day (P < 0.05). Gentamicin injected at 1300 h induced a significantly greater increase of [3H]thymidine incorporation into DNA of renal cortex (P < 0.01), a significantly greater inhibition of sphingomyelinase activity (P < 0.05), and significantly more histopathological lesions than the same dose injected at another time of the day. Creatinine and blood urea nitrogen levels in serum were significantly higher (P < 0.05) and the creatinine clearance was significantly lower (P < 0.05) when gentamicin was injected at 1300 h than when it was injected at another time of day. Our data suggest temporal variations in both the toxicity and the effectiveness of gentamicin, the drug being more effective and less toxic when injected during the activity period of the animals.

Once daily aminoglycoside therapy. Is it less toxic than multiple daily doses and how should it be monitored?

After 50 years of clinical experience with the aminoglycoside agents, there is continuing debate over the most appropriate administration regimen for these drugs. In recent years, once daily administration has been used increasingly, in the hope of both improving efficacy and reducing toxicity. At least 30 controlled clinical trials have compared once versus conventional multiple daily administration. Efficacy was assessed in some, but not all, studies using clinical and/or bacteriological cure. Toxicity was generally determined using rather nonsensitive end-points such as measurement of serum creatinine for nephrotoxicity and clinically detectable hearing loss for ototoxicity. The results of individual clinical trials and subsequent meta-analyses have been variable. However, 5 of 9 meta-analyses found clinical efficacy to be significantly better with once daily administration, and in 3 of the 9 there were significantly less nephrotoxicity with once daily administration. The results were not significant for ototoxicity in any of the meta-analyses. There is debate about how therapeutic drug monitoring should be performed, and whether it is still required with once daily administration. Previous experience with the aminoglycosides, especially in patients with impaired drug clearance caused by renal impairment, suggests that monitoring is still prudent. Results from the once daily administration trials appear to support this. Various methods of monitoring and dose adjustment have been proposed. The most common is to measure a 24-hour trough concentration and to adjust the dose to maintain the trough concentration below a value of 2, 1 or 0.5 mg/L. However, this method allows for greater total aminoglycoside exposure than has been permitted with conventional dosages, increasing the likelihood of toxicity in patients with impaired aminoglycoside clearance. Other methods measure drug concentrations at a time-point or points within the dose interval (when the concentration is still measurable), and adjust the dose according to concentration-time curve nomograms or to a target area under the concentration-time curve. This allows the use of higher doses in those with high drug clearance. Furthermore, in patients with impaired clearance, drug exposure is limited to the same extent as, or less than, that with conventional multiple daily administration. To date no controlled trials have compared methods of dose-individualisation. In summary, in addition to a slight overall improvement in efficacy, once daily administration has resulted in a small reduction in nephrotoxicity. In the studies using more sensitive measures of toxicity, the differences in toxicity were greater, strengthening the case for once daily administration. Therapeutic drug monitoring is probably required with once daily administration. Methods which use mid-dosage interval concentrations to gauge drug exposure would seem to be preferable over trough concentration measurement.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of outpatient intravenous antimicrobial therapy

Outpatient intravenous antimicrobial therapy has been widely accepted over the past decade. Knowledge of both the pharmacokinetics of antimicrobials and the pharmacodynamics predictive of antimicrobial efficacy enables one to design reasonable outpatient intravenous regimens for most agents. This article summarizes current knowledge of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of agents commonly used in outpatient intravenous treatment regimens.

A randomized comparison of the safety and efficacy of once-daily gentamicin or thrice-daily gentamicin in combination with ticarcillin-clavulanate

PURPOSE

The primary purpose of the clinical trial was to assess the safety and efficacy of once-a-day compared with three-times-a-day gentamicin in patients with serious infections who had protocol-determined peak serum aminoglycoside concentrations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 249 hospitalized patients with suspected or proven serious infections were randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio to gentamicin given three times a day with ticarcillin-clavulanate (TC), gentamicin once a day with TC, or ticarcillin-clavulanate (TC) alone. The gentamicin once-a-day dosage for patients with estimated creatinine clearance values of > or =80 mL/min was 5.1 mg/kg. With lower creatinine clearance estimates, the mg/kg dosage of gentamicin was decreased, and the dosage intervals (once daily or three times a day) were maintained. Evaluability required documentation of achievement of protocol-defined peak serum gentamicin levels.

RESULTS

Of the total 175 evaluable patients, there were no significant differences found between treatment regimens with respect to clinical or microbiologic efficacy. Bedside audiometry proved impractical due to the frequency of altered mental state in ill patients. Based on the traditional increase in serum creatinine values from baseline values, no differences in renal toxicity between the treatment groups was identified. When changes in renal function were reanalyzed based on maintaining, as opposed to worsening, of renal function, preservation of renal function was better in the gentamicin once-a-day patients as opposed to the gentamicin three-times-a-day patients, P <0.01.

CONCLUSIONS

Gentamicin once a day plus TC, gentamicin three times a day plus TC, and TC alone had similar effects in seriously ill hospitalized patients. The incidence of nephrotoxicity was similar in the three treatment groups. Using a nonvalidated post-hoc analysis, renal function was better preserved in gentamicin once-a-day + TC and TC-only patients as opposed to gentamicin three-times-a-day + TC.

Assessment of drug accumulation in the evaluation of pharmacokinetic data

The evaluation of drug accumulation is approached from a practical point of view. Estimates of accumulation indices as obtained from standard estimators-AUC, peak levels, and trough levels (RAUAUC Rmax and Rmin, respectively)-are compared and differences analyzed. The estimators are based on the concentration-time curve characteristics area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), maximum concentration, and trough level. Simulated data are used for the analysis, both noise-free and with random error added. The data are based on pharmacokinetic parameters derived from a clinical study. The numerical procedures can be reproduced by the interested reader with little effort. It is shown empirically that if Rmin, > RAUC then simple kinetic behavior cannot be safely assumed, but accumulation is a complex function of time. Rmax as obtained from the data and an estimate of this value based on time to peak concentration (tmax) and apparent elimination rate constant (lambda(z)) after a single dose and at steady state can then be compared in an attempt to exclude time-dependent kinetics. This new numerical procedure can provide valuable and even pivotal information regarding the accumulation kinetics of a compound under investigation. Recommendations on how to use the available concentration-time information to the best advantage are presented. It is concluded that the assessment of drug accumulation should not be confined to the calculation of just one estimate, because the three estimators RAUC, Rmax. and Rmin reflect different aspects of accumulation. Moreover, all information about accumulation should be carefully analyzed in the clinical context. This way the relevant accumulation can be identified for safe and efficacious drug treatment.

A randomized, prospective study comparing once-daily gentamicin versus thrice-daily gentamicin in the treatment of puerperal infection

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy, safety, and antibiotic-related charges for once-daily gentamicin with twice-daily clindamycin were compared with those of thrice-daily dosing of these antibiotics.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients with puerperal endometritis or with chorioamnionitis in labor assessed to be at risk for endometritis were randomized to receive gentamicin 4 mg/kg intravenously every 24 hours with clindamycin 1200 mg intravenously every 12 hours (experimental arm) or gentamicin 1.33 mg/kg intravenously and clindamycin 800 mg intravenously every 8 hours (conventional dosing interval arm). Primary outcomes included cure rates, mean length of treatment, antibiotic-related charges, and nephrotoxicity. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to control for confounding variables.

RESULTS

There were 135 and 137 patients randomized to the experimental and conventional interval arms, respectively. Cures were obtained in 94.1% and 87.6% of patients in the experimental and conventional arms, respectively (p = 0.06). The experimental arm had mean antibiotic charges of $250.79 versus $442.49 in the conventional arm (p < 0.0001). There was no permanent nephrotoxicity in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily gentamicin dosing with twice-daily clindamycin dosing is as efficacious and safe as the thrice-daily dosing of gentamicin and clindamycin for peripartum uterine infection. The experimental regimen results in substantial cost savings. The incidence of nephrotoxicity is low.