Risk factors leading to clinical failure in the treatment of intra-abdominal or skin/soft tissue infections

Critical issues in the clinical management of complicated intra-abdominal infections

Intra-abdominal infections differ from other infections through the broad variety in causes and severity of the infection, the aetiology of which is often polymicrobial, the microbiological results that are difficult to interpret and the essential role of surgical intervention. From a clinical viewpoint, two major types of intra-abdominal infections can be distinguished: uncomplicated and complicated. In uncomplicated intra-abdominal infection, the infectious process only involves a single organ and no anatomical disruption is present. Generally, patients with such infections can be managed with surgical resection alone and no antimicrobial therapy besides perioperative prophylaxis is necessary. In complicated intra-abdominal infections, the infectious process proceeds beyond the organ that is the source of the infection, and causes either localised peritonitis, also referred to as abdominal abscess, or diffuse peritonitis, depending on the ability of the host to contain the process within a part of the abdominal cavity. In particular, complicated intra-abdominal infections are an important cause of morbidity and are more frequently associated with a poor prognosis. However, an early clinical diagnosis, followed by adequate source control to stop ongoing contamination and restore anatomical structures and physiological function, as well as prompt initiation of appropriate empirical therapy, can limit the associated mortality. The biggest challenge with complicated intra-abdominal infections is early recognition of the problem. Antimicrobial management is generally standardised and many regimens, either with monotherapy or combination therapy, have proven their efficacy. Routine coverage against enterococci is not recommended, but can be useful in particular clinical conditions such as the presence of septic shock in patients previously receiving prolonged treatment with cephalosporins, immunosuppressed patients at risk for bacteraemia, the presence of prosthetic heart valves and recurrent intra-abdominal infection accompanied by severe sepsis. In patients with prolonged hospital stay and antibacterial therapy, the likelihood of involvement of antibacterial-resistant pathogens must be taken into account. Antimicrobial coverage of Candida spp. is recommended when there is evidence of candidal involvement or in patients with specific risk factors for invasive candidiasis such as immunodeficiency and prolonged antibacterial exposure. In general, antimicrobial therapy should be continued for 5-7 days. If sepsis is still present after 1 week, a diagnostic work up should be performed, and if necessary a surgical reintervention should be considered.

Candida as a risk factor for mortality in peritonitis*

OBJECTIVE

The clinical significance of Candida cultured from peritoneal fluid specimens remains a matter of debate. None of the studies that have addressed this issue have clearly distinguished between community-acquired peritonitis and nosocomial peritonitis. The current study tried to differentiate the pathogenic role of Candida in these two clinical settings and assess its importance on outcome.

DESIGN

A multiple-center, retrospective, case-control study was conducted in intensive care unit patients. The interaction between mortality rates and type of patients was assessed. In the case of a significant interaction, a separate analysis of mortality and morbidity was planned.

SETTING

Seventeen intensive care units in teaching and nonteaching hospitals.

PATIENTS

Cases were patients operated on for peritonitis with Candida cultured from the peritoneal fluid, whereas controls were operated patients free from yeast. Cases and controls were matched for type of infection, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, age, and time period of hospitalization.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The following characteristics were collected: demographic variables, underlying disease, severity score, site of infection, microbiological features, and anti-infective treatments. Survival was defined as the main outcome criterion and morbidity variables as secondary criteria. Odds ratios of mortality were calculated. Matching was achieved in 91 cases and 168 controls. Matching criteria, clinical characteristics, and mortality rate were not statistically different between cases and controls. A significant interaction was demonstrated between mortality rates and type of infection, leading to separate analysis of patients with community-acquired peritonitis and nosocomial peritonitis. The subgroup analysis demonstrated an increased mortality rate only in nosocomial peritonitis with fungal isolates (48% vs. 28% in controls, p<.01). Upper gastrointestinal tract site (odds ratio, 4.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-14.8) and isolation of Candida species (odds ratio, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-6.7, p<.001) were found to be independent risk factors of mortality in nosocomial peritonitis patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Isolation of Candida species appears to be an independent risk factor of mortality in nosocomial peritonitis but not in community-acquired peritonitis.

Safety and efficacy of tigecycline in treatment of skin and skin structure infections: results of a double-blind phase 3 comparison study with vancomycin-aztreonam

In a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, 546 patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections received tigecycline 100 mg/day (a 100-mg initial dose and then 50 mg intravenously twice daily) or the combination of vancomycin 2 g/day (1 g intravenously twice daily) and aztreonam 4 g/day (2 g intravenously twice daily) for up to 14 days. The primary end point was the clinical response in the clinical modified intent-to-treat (c-mITT) and clinically evaluable (CE) populations at the test-of-cure visit 12 to 92 days after the last dose. The microbiologic response at the test-of-cure visit was also assessed. Safety was assessed by physical examination, laboratory results, and adverse event reporting. Five hundred twenty patients were included in the c-mITT population (tigecycline group, n = 261; combination group, n = 259), and 436 were clinically evaluable (tigecycline group, n = 223; combination group, n = 213). The clinical responses in the tigecycline and the combination vancomycin and aztreonam groups were similar in the c-mITT population (84.3% versus 86.9%; difference, -2.6% [95% confidence interval, -9.0, 3.8]; P = 0.4755) and the CE population (89.7% versus 94.4%; difference, -4.7% [95% confidence interval, -10.2, 0.8]; P = 0.1015). Microbiologic eradication (documented or presumed) occurred in 84.8% of the patients receiving tigecycline and 93.2% of the patients receiving vancomycin and aztreonam (difference, -8.5 [95% confidence interval, -16.0, -1.0]; P = 0.0243). The numbers of patients reporting adverse events were similar in the two groups, with increased nausea and vomiting rates in the tigecycline group and an increased incidence of rash and increases in alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels in the combination vancomycin and aztreonam group. Tigecycline was shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections.

Treatment of intra-abdominal and skin and soft tissue infections: The role of the glycylcyclines

The need for new, effective agents to treat multidrug-resistant infections continues to grow as more and more bacteria develop resistance that may result in clinical therapeutic failure. This is particularly true for common surgical infections, such as complicated intra-abdominal infections, which frequently involve multiple pathogens, making therapy with a broad-spectrum antibiotic an important treatment intervention, and also for complicated skin infections, which often involve methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). With treatment options limited, it has become critical to identify antibiotics with novel mechanisms of activity. Several new drugs have emerged as possible therapeutic alternatives: linezolid, quinupristin-dalfopristin and most recently daptomycin have all been FDA-approved for the treatment of skin and skin structure infections. This review examines the potential role of a new class of investigational agents, the glycylcyclines, also recently FDA-approved and currently under review for European licensing, in the treatment of complicated skin infections and intra-abdominal infections. Tigecycline, the first of the glycylcyclines, has shown excellent activity in Phase III studies of these infections, achieving clinical success rates ranging from 70% to 91%. Furthermore, it has a good safety profile, suggesting it will be a clinical useful addition to current therapeutic options for the treatment of complicated skin infections and intra-abdominal infections.

An open-label, randomized study comparing efficacy and safety of intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam and ampicillin/sulbactam for infected diabetic foot ulcers

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue and bone infections of the lower limb continue to be a frequent and serious complication in patients with diabetes mellitus. The best choice of antimicrobial for the empiric treatment of moderate to severe diabetic foot infections has not been established clearly.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter trial comparing piperacillin/tazobactam (P/T) (4 g/0.5 g q8h) and ampicillin/sulbactam (A/S) (2 g/1 g q6h) as a parenteral treatment for 314 adult patients with moderate-to-severe infected diabetic foot ulcers. Patients with polymicrobial infections involving methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus also received vancomycin 1 g q12h.

RESULTS

Clinical efficacy rates (cure or improvement) were statistically equivalent overall (81% for P/T vs. 83.1% for A/S), and median duration of treatment was similar in the clinically evaluable populations (nine days for P/T, 10 days for A/S). Drug-related adverse events for both study drugs were comparable in frequency and type.

CONCLUSIONS

Although both study drugs provide safe and effective empiric treatment for moderate-to-severe infected diabetic foot ulcers, piperacillin/tazobactam has the advantage of covering Pseudomonas aeruginosa (bacteriologic success rate of 85.7%), the most commonly isolated gram-negative pathogen in this study.

Comparative study of the effects of ceftizoxime, piperacillin, and piperacillin-tazobactam concentrations on antibacterial activity and selection of antibiotic-resistant mutants of Enterobacter cloacae and Bacteroides fragilis in vitro and in vivo in mixed-infection abscesses

The effects of ceftizoxime (CZX), piperacillin (PIP), and PIP-tazobactam (PT) concentrations on the antibacterial activity and selection of resistant mutants of Bacteroides fragilis and Enterobacter cloacae were investigated in vitro in a mixed-culture anaerobic time-kill study and in vivo in a mixed-infection abscess model. Mixed cultures were incubated for 24 h with 0.125 to 512 micro g of CZX per ml or 0.125 to 2,048 micro g of PIP or PT per ml. Mice were treated every 2 h for 24 h with CZX at 6 to 1,536 mg/kg/day or with PIP or PT at 24 to 6,144 mg/kg/day starting 30 min before inoculation with different B. fragilis-E. cloacae combinations. There was a good correlation between the in vitro and in vivo activities of the antibiotics and their MICs obtained with high inocula (10(8) CFU/ml). The respective 50% effective doses (milligrams per kilogram per day) with B. fragilis and E. cloacae 22491 were 771 and 521 for CZX, 416 and 643 for PIP, and 85 and 554 for PT, and with the B. fragilis-E. cloacae 032349 combination, they were 81 and 21 for CZX and 77 and 766 for PT. Resistant mutants of E. cloacae 22491 were preferentially selected in vitro with 2 to 64 micro g of CZX per ml and in vivo with CZX at 12 to 384 mg/kg/day. There was no preferential selection of CZX-resistant B. fragilis or E. cloacae 032349. For CZX-resistant E. cloacae 22491, we found a 16- to 512-fold increase in the MIC of CZX and increased MICs of other expanded-spectrum cephalosporins, owing in part to the production of a stably derepressed cephalosporinase. In vitro and in vivo, PT did not select resistant mutants of E. cloacae and B. fragilis. Results demonstrate the adverse microbiological outcome of choosing an expanded-spectrum cephalosporin like CZX for empirical treatment of mixed infections involving a susceptible Enterobacter strain.

Effect of linezolid versus vancomycin on length of hospital stay in patients with complicated skin and soft tissue infections caused by known or suspected methicillin-resistant staphylococci: results from a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Complicated skin and soft tissue infections are common surgical indications usually requiring patients to be hospitalized, and are often caused by gram-positive bacteria, including methicillin-resistant staphylococci such as MRSA. Vancomycin has been the standard treatment for methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections in many countries, but its intravenous-only formulation for systemic infections often confines patients to the hospital for the treatment. Linezolid, a novel oxazolidinone antibiotic available in intravenous and 100% bioavailable oral forms, was shown in a randomized trial to be as efficacious as vancomycin for suspected or proven methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections. To determine if oral linezolid can reduce length of hospital stay (LOS) when compared to vancomycin, we compared the LOS for the 230 complicated skin and soft tissue infection patients enrolled in this trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients received up to four weeks of linezolid (intravenous followed by optional oral) or vancomycin (intravenous only), followed by up to four weeks of observation. Unadjusted LOS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival functions, whereas the log-logistic survival analysis model was used to estimate the multivariate-adjusted LOS controlling for patient demographics and selected baseline clinical variables. Analysis was done on the intent-to-treat (n = 230) sample as well as on two subsamples of the clinically evaluable (n = 144) and surgical site infection (n = 114) patients.

RESULTS

The unadjusted Kaplan-Meier median LOS was five days shorter for the linezolid group than the vancomycin group in the intent-to-treat sample (9 vs. 14 days, p = 0.052). It was eight days shorter (8 vs. 16 days, p = 0.0025) in the clinically evaluable sample, but the difference in the surgical site infection sample was not significant (10 vs. 14 days; p = 0.29). The linezolid group's unadjusted mean LOS was 1.7, 5.3 and 0.8 days shorter in the intentto-treat, clinically evaluable, and surgical site infection samples, respectively. After adjusting for age, gender, race, geographic region, bacteremia, type of inpatient location, and number of concurrent medical conditions using the log-logistic model, between-treatment differences in the multivariate-adjusted median LOS decreased to 3, 6, and 3 days, whereas the differences in mean LOS increased to 3.1, 6.5 and 2.5 days for the intent-to-treat, clinically evaluable, and surgical site infection samples (p < 0.01, < 0.01, and < 0.10), respectively. When the between-treatment differences in LOS were expressed as odds ratio of hospital discharges, multivariate-adjustment increased the odds ratios in favor of linezolid for all the three samples.

CONCLUSION

Results from this randomized trial show that linezolid can significantly reduce LOS for patients with complicated skin and soft tissue infections from suspected or confirmed methicillin-resistant staphylococci.

Occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of pathogens isolated from skin and soft tissue infections: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (United States and Canada, 2000)

A total of 1,404 bacterial isolates were recovered from skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) from hospitalized patients in 24 sites in the United States (US) and 5 Canadian medical centers as part of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. Isolates were collected between October and December, 2000. The rank order of pathogens was: Staphylococcus aureus (45.9%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10.8%), Enterococcus spp. (8.2%), Escherichia coli (7.0%), Enterobacter spp. (5.8%) and Klebsiella spp. (5.1%). The same order was observed in the US and Canada. Of note, almost 30% of S. aureus were oxacillin-resistant. Vancomycin resistance among enterococci was low (7.8%) representing a marked decrease from earlier SENTRY Program reports. Several antimicrobial agents remained very active against P. aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae isolates. In particular amikacin, cefepime, and the carbapenems (imipenem and meropenem) showed an excellent spectrum of activity (>95% susceptible). Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production was observed in both E. coli (7.1%) and Klebsiella spp. (11.3%). Cefepime remained highly active, even against ceftazidime-resistant isolates of Enterobacter spp. The results of this study have identified the most common causes of SSTIs in hospitalized patients in North America, and can be used to make informed decisions concerning standards of empiric treatment for SSTIs in this region.

Impact of antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacilli infections on outcome in hospitalized patients

OBJECTIVE

The impact of resistant (vs. nonresistant) Gram-negative infections on mortality remains unclear. We sought to define risk factors for and excess mortality from these infections.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Inpatient surgical wards at a university hospital.

PATIENTS

All patients in the general, transplant, and trauma surgery services diagnosed with Gram-negative rod (GNR) infection.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

All culture-proven GNR infections (n = 924) from December 1996 to September 2000 were studied. Characteristics and outcomes were compared between GNR infections with and without antibiotic resistance. Univariate and logistic regression analysis identified factors associated with antibiotic-resistant GNR (rGNR) infection and mortality. rGNR infection (n = 203) was associated with increased Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores (17.8 +/- 0.5), multiple comorbidities, pneumonia and catheter infection, coexistent infection with antibiotic-resistant Gram-positive cocci and fungi, and high mortality (27.1%). Only seven isolates were resistant in vitro to all available antibiotics. Logistic regression demonstrated that rGNR infection was an independent predictor of mortality (odds ratio, 2.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.35-3.67; p =.002). Analysis of rGNR infection with controls matched by organism, age, APACHE II score, and site of infection, however, revealed that antibiotic resistance was not associated with increased mortality (23.6% vs. 29.2%, p =.35). Furthermore, analysis of all Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections demonstrated no significant difference in mortality between resistant and sensitive strains (18.9% vs. 20.0%, p =.85).

CONCLUSION

rGNRs are associated with prolonged hospital stay and increased mortality. Infection with rGNRs independently predicts mortality; however, this may be more closely related to selection of certain bacterial species with a high frequency of resistance rather than actual resistance to antibiotic therapy. Therefore, altering infection-control practices to limit the dissemination of certain bacterial species may be more effective than attempts to control only antibiotic-resistant isolates.

Prophylactic treatment of gram-positive and gram-negative abdominal implant infections using locally delivered polyclonal antibodies

The increasing clinical incidence and host risk of biomaterial-centered infections, as well as the reduced effectiveness of clinically relevant antibiotics to treat such infections, provide compelling reasons to develop new approaches for treating implanted biomaterials in a surgical context. We describe the direct local delivery of polyclonal human antibodies to abdominal surgical implant sites to reduce infection severity and mortality in a lethal murine model of surgical implant-centered peritoneal infection. Surgical implant-centered peritonitis was produced in 180 female CF-1 mice by the direct inoculation of surgical-grade polypropylene mesh disks placed in the peritoneal cavity with lethal doses of either methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mice randomly received a resorbable antibody delivery vehicle at the implant site: either a blank carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) aqueous gel or the same CMC gel containing 10 mg of pooled polyclonal human immunoglobulin G locally on the implant after infection, either alone or in combination with systemic doses of cefazolin or vancomycin antibiotics. Human antibodies were rapidly released (first-order kinetics) from the gel carrier to both peritoneal fluids and serum in both infection scenarios. Inocula required for lethal infection were substantially reduced by surgery and the presence of the implant versus a closed lethal peritonitis model. Survival to 10 days with two different gram-negative P. aeruginosa strains was significantly enhanced (p < 0.01) by the direct application of CMC gel containing antibodies alone to the surgical implant site. Human-equivalent doses of systemic vancomycin provided a significantly improved benefit (p < 0.01) against lethal, implant-centered, gram-positive MRSA infection. However, locally delivered polyclonal human antibodies in combination with a range of systemic vancomycin doses against MRSA failed to improve host survival. Successful antibody therapy against gram-negative, implant-centered infections complements the clinically routine use of systemic antibiotics, providing a mechanism of protection independent of antibiotic resistance.

Monotherapy with a broad-spectrum beta-lactam is as effective as its combination with an aminoglycoside in treatment of severe generalized peritonitis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. The Severe Generalized Peritonitis Study Group

In a randomized trial conducted in 35 centers, we compared the clinical efficacy and safety of piperacillin plus tazobactam (TAZ) alone (monotherapy [MT]) versus those of TAZ combined with amikacin (AMK) (combined therapy [CT]) for the treatment of severe generalized peritonitis (SGP). Primary analysis consisted of blind assessment by an independent committee of the failure rate 30 days after the end of treatment in the modified intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis (mITT) population. Of the 241 patients with suspected SGP randomized into the study, 227 were eligible for ITT analysis, including 204 (99 in the MT group and 105 in the CT group) with confirmed SGP (mITT population). A total of 159 patients were eligible for per-protocol (PP) analysis. The clinical failure rates were equivalent in the mITT and PP populations (MT versus CT): 56 versus 52%, (odds ratio [OR] 0.87, 90% confidence interval [CI] = 0. 6 to 1.27) for mITT and 49 versus 49% (OR = 1.03, 90% CI = 0.67 to 1. 59) for PP analysis. Mortality rates (ITT population, 19%; PP population, 21%) and overall adverse event rates (ITT population, 55%; PP population, 54%) were also similar. Six patients (three in MT group and three in the CT group) developed acute renal failure. In conclusion, the addition of AMK to TAZ does not seem to be necessary for the treatment of SGP, even after adjustment for the simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) and type of SGP.

Antimicrobial resistance and clinical outcome of Bacteroides bacteremia: findings of a multicenter prospective observational trial

There is debate regarding the correlation between in vitro susceptibility testing and clinical response to therapy for Bacteroides bacteremia. We conducted a prospective multicenter observational study of 128 patients with bacteroides bacteremia. Outcome was correlated with results of in vitro susceptibility testing of Bacteroides isolates recovered from blood and/or nonblood sites, determined with use of 3 end points: mortality at 30 days, clinical response (cure vs. failure), and microbiological response (eradication vs. persistence). The mortality rate among patients who received inactive therapy (45%) was higher than among patients who received active therapy (16%; P=.04). Clinical failure (82%) and microbiological persistence (42%) were higher for patients who received inactive therapy than for patients who received active therapy (22% and 12%, respectively; P=.0002 and.06, respectively). In vitro activity of agents directed at Bacteroides species reliably predicts outcome: the specificity was 97%, and positive predictive value was 82%. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing may be indicated for patients whose blood specimens yield Bacteroides species.

Efficacy of locally delivered polyclonal immunoglobulin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa peritonitis in a murine model

Infectious peritonitis results from bacterial contamination of the abdominal cavity. Conventional antibiotic treatment is complicated both by the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and by increased patient populations intrinsically at risk for nosocomial infections. To complement antibiotic therapies, the efficacy of direct, locally applied pooled human immunoglobulin G (IgG) was assessed in a murine model (strains CF-1, CD-1, and CFW) of peritonitis caused by intraperitoneal inoculations of 10(6) or 10(7) CFU of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (strains IFO-3455, M-2, and MSRI-7072). Various doses of IgG (0.005 to 10 mg/mouse) administered intraperitoneally simultaneously with local bacterial challenge significantly increased survival in a dose-dependent manner. Local intraperitoneal application of 10 mg of IgG increased animal survival independent of either the P. aeruginosa or the murine strains used. A local dose of 10 mg of IgG administered up to 6 h prophylactically or at the time of bacterial challenge resulted in 100% survival. Therapeutic 10-mg IgG treatment given up to 12 h postinfection also significantly increased survival. Human IgG administered to the mouse peritoneal cavity was rapidly detected systemically in serum. Additionally, administered IgG in peritoneal lavage fluid samples actively opsonized and decreased the bacterial burden via phagocytosis at 2 and 4 h post-bacterial challenge. Tissue microbial quantification studies showed that 1.0 mg of locally applied IgG significantly reduced the bacterial burden in the liver, peritoneal cavity, and blood and correlated with reduced levels of interleukin-6 in serum.